Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Vallter
Hope for patch 7.1 this year!
12.12.2011 15:13:39
Subject: Hope for patch 7.1 this year!
Link on message: #1178453
Link on message: #1178453
Vallter: 7,1 test will be up soon, probably this week. Since it does not
contain big amount of neither server nor gameplay changes, we hope
that 7.1.2 will be more or less ready for release.
Still, I doubt that 7.1 will be updated before Christmas. My personal pessimistic estimations - first decade of January.
Still, I doubt that 7.1 will be updated before Christmas. My personal pessimistic estimations - first decade of January.
Vallter
Hope for patch 7.1 this year!
12.12.2011 15:13:39
Subject: Hope for patch 7.1 this year!
Link on message: #1178453
Link on message: #1178453
Vallter: 7,1 test will be up soon, probably this week. Since it does not
contain big amount of neither server nor gameplay changes, we hope
that 7.1.2 will be more or less ready for release.
Still, I doubt that 7.1 will be updated before Christmas. My personal pessimistic estimations - first decade of January.
Still, I doubt that 7.1 will be updated before Christmas. My personal pessimistic estimations - first decade of January.
Hypnotik
lol'd at this random battle
12.12.2011 06:08:11
Subject: lol'd at this random battle
Link on message: #1177606
Link on message: #1177606
Hypnotik: Here's the oddest one I've been in:
9 arty vs 8 arty.
9 arty vs 8 arty.
GeneralDirection
Wargaming is failing.
11.12.2011 12:30:55
Subject: 
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Wargaming is failing.
Link on message: #1175047
Dands, on Dec 11 2011 - 08:31, said: Okay so the rest of the world believe you UNDER PROMISE and you
OVER DELIVER.
Apparently not Wargaming. You mention all your awards, you mention WoShips, WoWarplanes and you can't even get WoTanks right.
I've seen a few jobs advertised. But one is missing. That is the job responsible for DELIVERING on your schedules. I've put and stupidly I must admit on reflection over $200 into this game. And you can't even make the game work.
The US heavy tree is absolute CRAP. You make promises to deliver "new" tanks before Xmas and now it's 2012! You talk about US tanks as 'support' tanks. WTF does that mean in anything other than a clan match? And even then, most clans will just use the monster tier 10s. Rock paper sissors my ass. You talk about "hull down" is the trick for US tanks survival. Tell me how to hull down in a city map? Tell me how many points on each map can you hull down and then tell me how many arty experts wouldn't fire into those positions out of expectation?
My god the KV-3 has more survivability then my T30 or T34. Oh but that's Russian. Forgot there is no bias.
So as you might guess I'm pissed off and feeling very much like just quitting thinking this game as a bad joke. It could be great but get your priorities right. How much time have you spend on developing bloody tank horns?? Stupid. How about you deliver the M203 and T110 and make them a head to head worthy tank in their tiers.
Support tanks DON'T WORK.
SMD
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Wargaming is failing.Link on message: #1175047
Dands, on Dec 11 2011 - 08:31, said: Okay so the rest of the world believe you UNDER PROMISE and you
OVER DELIVER.Apparently not Wargaming. You mention all your awards, you mention WoShips, WoWarplanes and you can't even get WoTanks right.
I've seen a few jobs advertised. But one is missing. That is the job responsible for DELIVERING on your schedules. I've put and stupidly I must admit on reflection over $200 into this game. And you can't even make the game work.
The US heavy tree is absolute CRAP. You make promises to deliver "new" tanks before Xmas and now it's 2012! You talk about US tanks as 'support' tanks. WTF does that mean in anything other than a clan match? And even then, most clans will just use the monster tier 10s. Rock paper sissors my ass. You talk about "hull down" is the trick for US tanks survival. Tell me how to hull down in a city map? Tell me how many points on each map can you hull down and then tell me how many arty experts wouldn't fire into those positions out of expectation?
My god the KV-3 has more survivability then my T30 or T34. Oh but that's Russian. Forgot there is no bias.
So as you might guess I'm pissed off and feeling very much like just quitting thinking this game as a bad joke. It could be great but get your priorities right. How much time have you spend on developing bloody tank horns?? Stupid. How about you deliver the M203 and T110 and make them a head to head worthy tank in their tiers.
Support tanks DON'T WORK.
SMD
GeneralDirection: This forum is intended for World of Tanks suggestions. Moving this
to Gameplay Discussion.
Tanitha
a premium AC doesn't look seem like one
11.12.2011 12:18:21
Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\a premium AC doesn't look seem like one
Link on message: #1175029
jeffrey951753, on Dec 11 2011 - 09:58, said: you know the 7 days premium account comes with the freeT-127
code?well,i was expecting double credits and experiences for all
the battles with this week but they seem like NORMAL.Why?
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\a premium AC doesn't look seem like oneLink on message: #1175029
jeffrey951753, on Dec 11 2011 - 09:58, said: you know the 7 days premium account comes with the freeT-127
code?well,i was expecting double credits and experiences for all
the battles with this week but they seem like NORMAL.Why?Tanitha: It makes a big difference in credits in the bigger tanks,
If for example you made 1500 exp, you would get 50% more exp with premium.
But if you made 60k credits and your ammo and repair bill was 50k, you would make 10k credits total.
With a 50% bonus, instead you would make 90k credits, 40k repairs and ammo, = 50k profit.
50k profit instead of the 10k profit means 500% increase on the credit profit.
Tan.
If for example you made 1500 exp, you would get 50% more exp with premium.
But if you made 60k credits and your ammo and repair bill was 50k, you would make 10k credits total.
With a 50% bonus, instead you would make 90k credits, 40k repairs and ammo, = 50k profit.
50k profit instead of the 10k profit means 500% increase on the credit profit.
Tan.
Tanitha
a premium AC doesn't look seem like one
11.12.2011 12:18:21
Subject: a premium AC doesn't look seem like one
Link on message: #1175029
jeffrey951753, on Dec 11 2011 - 09:58, said: you know the 7 days premium account comes with the freeT-127
code?well,i was expecting double credits and experiences for all
the battles with this week but they seem like NORMAL.Why?
Link on message: #1175029
jeffrey951753, on Dec 11 2011 - 09:58, said: you know the 7 days premium account comes with the freeT-127
code?well,i was expecting double credits and experiences for all
the battles with this week but they seem like NORMAL.Why?Tanitha:
It makes a big difference in credits in the bigger tanks,
If for example you made 1500 exp, you would get 50% more exp with premium.
But if you made 60k credits and your ammo and repair bill was 50k, you would make 10k credits total.
With a 50% bonus, instead you would make 90k credits, 50k repairs and ammo, = 40k profit.
40k profit instead of the 10k profit means 400% increase on the credit profit.
Tan.
It makes a big difference in credits in the bigger tanks,
If for example you made 1500 exp, you would get 50% more exp with premium.
But if you made 60k credits and your ammo and repair bill was 50k, you would make 10k credits total.
With a 50% bonus, instead you would make 90k credits, 50k repairs and ammo, = 40k profit.
40k profit instead of the 10k profit means 400% increase on the credit profit.
Tan.
GeneralDirection
All Star Feedback
11.12.2011 12:14:11
Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Suggestions\All Star Feedback
Link on message: #1175022
Lexx98, on Dec 11 2011 - 08:11, said: Original Gaea post with M4 All Star results has phrase like "we
involve a tie breackers", so i decide earlier there was not any
ties, and now they are.
Anyway, i want old rules, when all who get same MVP points get same place and same reward, so winners count may be more than prize places.
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Suggestions\All Star FeedbackLink on message: #1175022
Lexx98, on Dec 11 2011 - 08:11, said: Original Gaea post with M4 All Star results has phrase like "we
involve a tie breackers", so i decide earlier there was not any
ties, and now they are.Anyway, i want old rules, when all who get same MVP points get same place and same reward, so winners count may be more than prize places.
GeneralDirection: For January we will have All Star events twice a week, so the
reality is we need to have tie breakers. If we were to use the tie
system from MVP events, we could only hold one or two All Star
events a month.
That said, the tie breaker likely will not be experience. We're discussing alternatives and will make sure it's very clear in the rules of the event.
That said, the tie breaker likely will not be experience. We're discussing alternatives and will make sure it's very clear in the rules of the event.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
11.12.2011 12:09:18
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1175020
anontk421, on Dec 11 2011 - 11:06, said: Um, this kinda sucks to change the rules more than half way through
the weekend. I've played several games that would rank higher than
the ones I got +2 tier kills medal in even with +10 pts but I
didn't bother to print screen them because I didn't get 3 +2 tier
kills in them and now there is less than a day left.
I agree with earlier post, make the +2 tier kill medal worth more that +10 pts. Say +20 pts or even +30 pts, so that those who achieved the original entry requirements will be assured to rank higher than those that didn't. This still enables others to enter and fill out the winner placements in-case not many achieved 3 Orlik/Oskin/Halonen medals.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1175020
anontk421, on Dec 11 2011 - 11:06, said: Um, this kinda sucks to change the rules more than half way through
the weekend. I've played several games that would rank higher than
the ones I got +2 tier kills medal in even with +10 pts but I
didn't bother to print screen them because I didn't get 3 +2 tier
kills in them and now there is less than a day left.I agree with earlier post, make the +2 tier kill medal worth more that +10 pts. Say +20 pts or even +30 pts, so that those who achieved the original entry requirements will be assured to rank higher than those that didn't. This still enables others to enter and fill out the winner placements in-case not many achieved 3 Orlik/Oskin/Halonen medals.
GeneralDirection: Yep, we're bumping the points to 20 per Orlik/Oskin/Halonen medal.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
11.12.2011 12:03:16
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1175013
Cybergyn, on Dec 11 2011 - 07:22, said: I don't understand changing the rules in the middle of the event. I
worked hard all day to get 3 matchs with a win and a medal. I agree
with SaVaGee that it can be done, because I did it today. I know
you have given 10 points for the Oskin's or Halonen's, but it also
means that tier 9 TD's and Mediums can be used now once you get one
medal in one battle. Only needing one medal in one battle now
changes this event dramatically. It also means you will have many
more entries to go through. An event with these adjusted rules
could have been done next month or weekend.
SaVaGee, on Dec 11 2011 - 07:38, said: At least bump up the points for the 2+ tier kill medal to 20
points, so people dont get one medal in a light tank and use their
mini maus 38H735(f) for their other two games . The contest was all
about MVP but now its not. Im not trying to complain but it is a
lot different contest now.... makes me sad 
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1175013
Cybergyn, on Dec 11 2011 - 07:22, said: I don't understand changing the rules in the middle of the event. I
worked hard all day to get 3 matchs with a win and a medal. I agree
with SaVaGee that it can be done, because I did it today. I know
you have given 10 points for the Oskin's or Halonen's, but it also
means that tier 9 TD's and Mediums can be used now once you get one
medal in one battle. Only needing one medal in one battle now
changes this event dramatically. It also means you will have many
more entries to go through. An event with these adjusted rules
could have been done next month or weekend.GeneralDirection: A person that only submits a single battle with the required medal
is going to have a pretty difficult time winning against players
that earn the medal in all three submitted battles. Submitting
three medals means 40 more points than the person who decides to
use tier 9 TDs and mediums.
SaVaGee, on Dec 11 2011 - 07:38, said: At least bump up the points for the 2+ tier kill medal to 20
points, so people dont get one medal in a light tank and use their
mini maus 38H735(f) for their other two games . The contest was all
about MVP but now its not. Im not trying to complain but it is a
lot different contest now.... makes me sad GeneralDirection: Someone using the 38H735(f) will miss out on a potentially large
number of MVP points that they could gain by using another light
tank. Not only will they have no chance of getting Orlik's medal,
but they also have to rely on getting ~10 kills a battle (or more)
to offset missing out on Orlik's medal.
GeneralDirection
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
11.12.2011 11:50:37
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1174999
MemphisRex, on Dec 11 2011 - 09:59, said: So, is WG giving us the so called "most anticipated patch of all"
kind of 0.7.0 that they are promising from so long? I think you
guys said 'November', I guess it comes after December in WG's
calender.
And I thinkt you guys had something known as a project called 'World of WarPlanes', And afaik, you were gonna give us a Beta of WoWP as a Christmas/New Year gift. If a company can't provide a patch on due month(it's 30 days btw), how can they give a whole new game? I doubt it all. Battleships will remain a "DREAM PROJECT".
I know this post is gonna get Modded by GeneralDirection(The Best WG guys I've seen, cause he replies faster and precisely and in a cool manner) and I may get many negative reps. But truth is truth. I'll stand for it. Once more, If you are not Sure, then Please Don't declare even an approximate time, Keep your data Clandestine. Cause, People Expect it, And If Expectations are broken, Trust is broken, If trust is broken, players leave, if players leave, you lose everything you've built, especially when there are other new games coming in.
Trust me. Shit happens.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1174999
MemphisRex, on Dec 11 2011 - 09:59, said: So, is WG giving us the so called "most anticipated patch of all"
kind of 0.7.0 that they are promising from so long? I think you
guys said 'November', I guess it comes after December in WG's
calender.And I thinkt you guys had something known as a project called 'World of WarPlanes', And afaik, you were gonna give us a Beta of WoWP as a Christmas/New Year gift. If a company can't provide a patch on due month(it's 30 days btw), how can they give a whole new game? I doubt it all. Battleships will remain a "DREAM PROJECT".
I know this post is gonna get Modded by GeneralDirection(The Best WG guys I've seen, cause he replies faster and precisely and in a cool manner) and I may get many negative reps. But truth is truth. I'll stand for it. Once more, If you are not Sure, then Please Don't declare even an approximate time, Keep your data Clandestine. Cause, People Expect it, And If Expectations are broken, Trust is broken, If trust is broken, players leave, if players leave, you lose everything you've built, especially when there are other new games coming in.
Trust me. Shit happens.GeneralDirection: 1. It's the nature of game design and this isn't the first time a
patch for a game has been delayed. We wanted to release 7.0 in
November as badly as players wanted it, but we're not going to
release a patch half finished just to meet the date we hoped it
would be done by. I think you can agree that it's better to release
a finished patch a little later than originally planned than to
release one riddled with bugs.
2. World of Warplanes development is moving along fine, and is being developed by an entirely different team than World of Tanks.
3. World of Battleships is also being developed by an entirely different team than World of Tanks and World of Warplanes.
4. I would say the most anticipated patch of all will be the one that allows you to perform back flips in your tank. That'd be pretty awesome, IMO.
2. World of Warplanes development is moving along fine, and is being developed by an entirely different team than World of Tanks.
3. World of Battleships is also being developed by an entirely different team than World of Tanks and World of Warplanes.
4. I would say the most anticipated patch of all will be the one that allows you to perform back flips in your tank. That'd be pretty awesome, IMO.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
11.12.2011 08:19:29
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1174749
Twan, on Dec 11 2011 - 07:17, said: Hi, I just have a quick question with one of the rules I
noticed.
It says "Your entry will only be considered if you earned Halonen’s Medal in one of the battles submitted.", or the relevant medal for the light or medium tank category.
Does this mean that, for example, say I get one battle and destroy 3 vehicles 2 tiers above me in a TD and get Halonen's medal, and include this as my 1st of 3 battles in my entry for the TD category. The next battle, I don't get Halonen's medal, but do some damage and other things worth MVP points, and the same for the third battle.
It sounds like you only need Halonen's medal for ONE of the entries, is this true?
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1174749
Twan, on Dec 11 2011 - 07:17, said: Hi, I just have a quick question with one of the rules I
noticed.It says "Your entry will only be considered if you earned Halonen’s Medal in one of the battles submitted.", or the relevant medal for the light or medium tank category.
Does this mean that, for example, say I get one battle and destroy 3 vehicles 2 tiers above me in a TD and get Halonen's medal, and include this as my 1st of 3 battles in my entry for the TD category. The next battle, I don't get Halonen's medal, but do some damage and other things worth MVP points, and the same for the third battle.
It sounds like you only need Halonen's medal for ONE of the entries, is this true?
GeneralDirection: Yes, this is true.
GeneralDirection
Upcoming December Events
11.12.2011 07:34:45
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Upcoming December Events
Link on message: #1174695
Drakenred, on Dec 11 2011 - 01:51, said: that would be on the World of Warships forum
and can we please have the bloody first page back, im tired of poping my link to it only to have the twin tank hookers show up then have to clump arround the forums to find the links I want.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Upcoming December EventsLink on message: #1174695
Drakenred, on Dec 11 2011 - 01:51, said: that would be on the World of Warships forumand can we please have the bloody first page back, im tired of poping my link to it only to have the twin tank hookers show up then have to clump arround the forums to find the links I want.
GeneralDirection: Clearing your browser cache should fix that.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
11.12.2011 07:26:57
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1174690
Desdichado, on Dec 11 2011 - 06:13, said: Sigh. Please consider making the +2 kill medals worth like 15-20
points such that anyone that does manage the feat of getting 3
medals is more or less assured of placing.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1174690
Desdichado, on Dec 11 2011 - 06:13, said: Sigh. Please consider making the +2 kill medals worth like 15-20
points such that anyone that does manage the feat of getting 3
medals is more or less assured of placing.GeneralDirection: Good suggestion. We'll make the +2 kill medals 10 points each.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
11.12.2011 06:58:51
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1174646
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1174646
GeneralDirection: Doh! Fixing the news to include the email: events@worldoftanks.com.
We're also dropping this to one medal only, but you still must
submit three battles.
Again, you only need to earn the medal in ONE of your battles you're submitting.
Again, you only need to earn the medal in ONE of your battles you're submitting.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
10.12.2011 05:04:22
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1171282
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1171282
GeneralDirection: Three different tanks of the same type are allowed, so 3 lights, 3
mediums, etc.
GeneralDirection
You Ask, We Reply - Dec. 8, 2011
10.12.2011 04:02:22
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\You Ask - We Reply!\You Ask, We Reply - Dec. 8, 2011
Link on message: #1171089
wcd71, on Dec 10 2011 - 02:05, said: I'm Stupid lets get that out in the open! Now why am I having so
much trouble downloading a game. Running windows 7, computer system
4 5 yrs old. Downloaded game which took about 4 hrs. Then got the
Non 7z archive error. Researched that found 7zip downloaded that,
honestly don't know what to do with it! Messed around trying
different things nothing has worked! Please help?
World of Tanks News and Information\You Ask - We Reply!\You Ask, We Reply - Dec. 8, 2011Link on message: #1171089
wcd71, on Dec 10 2011 - 02:05, said: I'm Stupid lets get that out in the open! Now why am I having so
much trouble downloading a game. Running windows 7, computer system
4 5 yrs old. Downloaded game which took about 4 hrs. Then got the
Non 7z archive error. Researched that found 7zip downloaded that,
honestly don't know what to do with it! Messed around trying
different things nothing has worked! Please help?GeneralDirection: Hi wcd71,
Please open a support ticket. Our technical support team will be happy to assist you.
You can find the support website here: https://support.worldoftanks.com/
Please open a support ticket. Our technical support team will be happy to assist you.
You can find the support website here: https://support.worldoftanks.com/
GeneralDirection
Forums outage disclosure please
10.12.2011 02:58:12
Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Forums outage disclosure please
Link on message: #1170926
SumiXam, on Dec 09 2011 - 20:21, said: The wiki is still down though. ??? Can you elaborate on that?
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Forums outage disclosure pleaseLink on message: #1170926
SumiXam, on Dec 09 2011 - 20:21, said: The wiki is still down though. ??? Can you elaborate on that?GeneralDirection: The wiki downtime is unrelated from the forum downtime. Well, I
suppose they're for the same reasons: software updates. But the
wiki is not down due to the forum downtime.
GeneralDirection
Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All Star
10.12.2011 02:50:39
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All Star
Link on message: #1170907
Faltalis, on Dec 10 2011 - 01:32, said: Thank you for the initiative
Just a clarification does this mean people that tied for 1st place will all get 8000, and those who tied for 2nd place will get 6000, and those who tied for 3rd place will get 4000. As these were the amounts quoted in the contest.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All StarLink on message: #1170907
Faltalis, on Dec 10 2011 - 01:32, said: Thank you for the initiative Just a clarification does this mean people that tied for 1st place will all get 8000, and those who tied for 2nd place will get 6000, and those who tied for 3rd place will get 4000. As these were the amounts quoted in the contest.
GeneralDirection: Yes.
GeneralDirection
Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All Star
10.12.2011 02:21:13
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All Star
Link on message: #1170823
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All StarLink on message: #1170823
GeneralDirection: We're going to go ahead and reward all of the tanks that tied for
this particular event. But, we will be changing the rules on ties
for All Star events since they are going to be fairly frequent.
As a heads up, we probably won't be able to get the list of additional prize winners their gold until early next week.
As a heads up, we probably won't be able to get the list of additional prize winners their gold until early next week.
GeneralDirection
Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
10.12.2011 01:29:55
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP event
Link on message: #1170626
Alajhsm_Arabin, on Dec 10 2011 - 00:22, said: Can I participate submiting just one battle with the orlik's medal?
Or I need to submit 3 battles with it?
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Announcing the David vs Goliath MVP eventLink on message: #1170626
Alajhsm_Arabin, on Dec 10 2011 - 00:22, said: Can I participate submiting just one battle with the orlik's medal?
Or I need to submit 3 battles with it?GeneralDirection: All three battles submitted must reward the medal.
GeneralDirection
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
10.12.2011 01:18:53
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1170595
Cuth, on Dec 09 2011 - 23:43, said: Since they're also in MM as +2 tiers (or so I've heard) and take
way more experience to advance than tanks, doesn't it stand to
reason that they should also make more money than units their real
tier?
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1170595
Cuth, on Dec 09 2011 - 23:43, said: Since they're also in MM as +2 tiers (or so I've heard) and take
way more experience to advance than tanks, doesn't it stand to
reason that they should also make more money than units their real
tier?GeneralDirection: It's not that they shouldn't earn more credits than other tanks of
their tier--it's that they were earning a bit too much. Some of the
cases were more extreme than others, which is why you'll notice a
30% reduction for one and a 3% reduction for another.
GeneralDirection
December Challenge Cancelled
10.12.2011 01:03:48
Subject: Contests & Competitions\World of Tanks Tournaments\Challenges\December Challenge Cancelled
Link on message: #1170551
Contests & Competitions\World of Tanks Tournaments\Challenges\December Challenge CancelledLink on message: #1170551
GeneralDirection: We're going to be cancelling the December Challenges in order to
complete a fairly significant rewrite of the rules, while also
making them more comprehensive and clearly visible on the Challenge
forum.
That said, I would like to share the plan for Challenges as of January, 2012:
Registration will begin on the first Monday of the month and will end the following Friday.The first round will begin the second Monday of the month and the schedule will be based on the number of teams participating.We will not have maximum number of teams in place for a Challenge, except noting that there must be an even number of teams accepted. If we have to reject any teams so that the schedule will actually work, then this will be done based on the time the team was submitted for approval. All of the various team statuses (Forming, Pending Approval, etc.) will be clearly explained within the new rules.
Keep in mind that these are not all of the finalized rules--just topics we're comfortable with sharing. We're still discussing some of the rule changes and will be doing so into next week. I will be meeting with our E-Sports team at the Wargaming.net headquarters and hope to resolve a lot of the concerns with tournaments at that time.
That said, I would like to share the plan for Challenges as of January, 2012:
Registration will begin on the first Monday of the month and will end the following Friday.The first round will begin the second Monday of the month and the schedule will be based on the number of teams participating.We will not have maximum number of teams in place for a Challenge, except noting that there must be an even number of teams accepted. If we have to reject any teams so that the schedule will actually work, then this will be done based on the time the team was submitted for approval. All of the various team statuses (Forming, Pending Approval, etc.) will be clearly explained within the new rules.
Keep in mind that these are not all of the finalized rules--just topics we're comfortable with sharing. We're still discussing some of the rule changes and will be doing so into next week. I will be meeting with our E-Sports team at the Wargaming.net headquarters and hope to resolve a lot of the concerns with tournaments at that time.
Tanitha
13th Cavalry Regiment Embassy
10.12.2011 01:03:07
Subject: Off-Topic Discussion\Junkyard\13th Cavalry Regiment Embassy
Link on message: #1170550
Off-Topic Discussion\Junkyard\13th Cavalry Regiment EmbassyLink on message: #1170550
Tanitha: Closed as requested.
GeneralDirection
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
10.12.2011 00:39:59
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1170467
RedAlert2010, on Dec 09 2011 - 21:28, said: Can i ask, why has the ammo cost of all SPGs gone up?? and the
amount of income from the same arty has been reduced?
Just need a fair idea on why the arties were nerfed this way. Also what was the general idea behind it? Was it to reduce the amount of players using it or something else?
Stieger, on Dec 09 2011 - 21:49, said: Yep WOT did it again but not surprising how they nerf the german
tanks once again but somehow to manage to buff some of their
tanks!!
Rager_Beater, on Dec 09 2011 - 22:07, said: Us premium users who PAY to keep the game going, want balancing,
like fixing the Match Maker, and the LOS. but instead as the "big
update" we get things that arent needed right now, like probably
broken camo, Multicluster (as if we needed that RIGHT NOW) and
"fixes" disapointing. very disapointing.
cant you actually work on something that we need?
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1170467
RedAlert2010, on Dec 09 2011 - 21:28, said: Can i ask, why has the ammo cost of all SPGs gone up?? and the
amount of income from the same arty has been reduced?Just need a fair idea on why the arties were nerfed this way. Also what was the general idea behind it? Was it to reduce the amount of players using it or something else?
GeneralDirection: SPG credit income was too high compared to other tanks of their
tiers.
Stieger, on Dec 09 2011 - 21:49, said: Yep WOT did it again but not surprising how they nerf the german
tanks once again but somehow to manage to buff some of their
tanks!!GeneralDirection: This is not technically a nerf; damage over time remains the same.
Rager_Beater, on Dec 09 2011 - 22:07, said: Us premium users who PAY to keep the game going, want balancing,
like fixing the Match Maker, and the LOS. but instead as the "big
update" we get things that arent needed right now, like probably
broken camo, Multicluster (as if we needed that RIGHT NOW) and
"fixes" disapointing. very disapointing.cant you actually work on something that we need?
GeneralDirection: Multi-cluster technology is badly needed. It's a behind-the-scenes
change so it's not something you'll notice immediately. But yes,
it's something that is needed.
GeneralDirection
NA Tourny 5 Draws
10.12.2011 00:15:17
Subject: Contests & Competitions\World of Tanks Tournaments\Challenges\NA Tourny 5 Draws
Link on message: #1170391
Dukebarry, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:56, said: I should have a decision on this today. Sorry, this has never
happened (specifically all battles resulting in a draw in the
round), so it's taken a bit to discuss it and come to an amicable
resolution.
Today was yesterday,
Solution??
Contests & Competitions\World of Tanks Tournaments\Challenges\NA Tourny 5 DrawsLink on message: #1170391
Dukebarry, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:56, said: I should have a decision on this today. Sorry, this has never
happened (specifically all battles resulting in a draw in the
round), so it's taken a bit to discuss it and come to an amicable
resolution.Today was yesterday,
Solution??
GeneralDirection: It's not easy to post something when the forums are down for
maintenance.
The decision is:
Tournament is now over; there will be no first place or fourth place teams.
Barroom Brawlers and S.I.M.P. will both receive gold as if they placed second7thAD has placed third and will receive the proper gold valueThe first and fourth place gold prizes will carry over to the next Challenge and be distributed to places 1 through 4 evenly (so imagine if you will that each prize value will be increased by ~2,000 for January's tournament)
Moving forward, the rules will be set up so that a situation like this cannot happen.
The goal is to get teams their gold by Monday at the latest, but hopefully I can get the payment request sent to billing support in time for them to take care of it today.
The decision is:
Tournament is now over; there will be no first place or fourth place teams.
Barroom Brawlers and S.I.M.P. will both receive gold as if they placed second7thAD has placed third and will receive the proper gold valueThe first and fourth place gold prizes will carry over to the next Challenge and be distributed to places 1 through 4 evenly (so imagine if you will that each prize value will be increased by ~2,000 for January's tournament)
Moving forward, the rules will be set up so that a situation like this cannot happen.
The goal is to get teams their gold by Monday at the latest, but hopefully I can get the payment request sent to billing support in time for them to take care of it today.
GeneralDirection
Forums outage disclosure please
09.12.2011 21:01:44
Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Forums outage disclosure please
Link on message: #1169688
ITDUDE, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:53, said: Well, they called it "maintenance" after forums were already down
for few hours, so it definitely came without warning. It could be
just a "user error" and not an attack but I think still an official
explanation would be good. Also, they don't typically remove news
from the site. The news sections goes all the way back to 4/12 when
the game went live.
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Forums outage disclosure pleaseLink on message: #1169688
ITDUDE, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:53, said: Well, they called it "maintenance" after forums were already down
for few hours, so it definitely came without warning. It could be
just a "user error" and not an attack but I think still an official
explanation would be good. Also, they don't typically remove news
from the site. The news sections goes all the way back to 4/12 when
the game went live.GeneralDirection: Yeah, this was my fault and I just put the news back because you
have a good point -- it shouldn't be removed.
Regarding the downtime, we ran into issues with updating the forum software and wanted to make sure that didn't cause any additional problems with other services (game, support, clan wars, etc.). So we had to keep them down for a longer period of time than we would have liked to.
Regarding the downtime, we ran into issues with updating the forum software and wanted to make sure that didn't cause any additional problems with other services (game, support, clan wars, etc.). So we had to keep them down for a longer period of time than we would have liked to.
GeneralDirection
Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All Star
09.12.2011 20:57:33
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All Star
Link on message: #1169674
Lexx98, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:52, said: Changing rules about exp after event had ended - it's bad...
Read this: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1146829
So, who are the liar? Who changed this rule even after event was ended?
I wouldn't be surprised of feints like this in Russia (BR, Ukraine, etc...), but USA??? Where are your honor? Why you are so greedy?
About frequency, please read my posts:
http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1168348
http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1168764
Helped? Helped to who? Show me him by using your finger!
All who have next lower the 28 points result got nothing... Just like lower 25 points in Matilda.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Winners of the Matilda and M4 Sherman All StarLink on message: #1169674
Lexx98, on Dec 09 2011 - 19:52, said: Changing rules about exp after event had ended - it's bad...Read this: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1146829
So, who are the liar? Who changed this rule even after event was ended?
I wouldn't be surprised of feints like this in Russia (BR, Ukraine, etc...), but USA??? Where are your honor? Why you are so greedy?
About frequency, please read my posts:
http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1168348
http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1168764
Helped? Helped to who? Show me him by using your finger!
All who have next lower the 28 points result got nothing... Just like lower 25 points in Matilda.
GeneralDirection: The change was made primarily because it would not be fair for one
of the categories to have more prize winners than the other, which
was the case for this event.
GeneralDirection
You Ask, We Reply - Dec. 8, 2011
09.12.2011 20:55:19
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\You Ask - We Reply!\You Ask, We Reply - Dec. 8, 2011
Link on message: #1169665
World of Tanks News and Information\You Ask - We Reply!\You Ask, We Reply - Dec. 8, 2011Link on message: #1169665
GeneralDirection: The latest round of Q&A with the World of Tanks development
team.
Read more!
Read more!
Vallter
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 23:51:04
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169559
eat3reat3r, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: wait...i thought the pz4 hydrostatic was being put on regular
server 
i really wanted these new tanks (as
you can tell from my picture its a real bummer) 
grego34, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: i thought the "Historical mode" was going to be a game playing
option on this patch??
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1169559
eat3reat3r, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: wait...i thought the pz4 hydrostatic was being put on regular
server i really wanted these new tanks (as
you can tell from my picture its a real bummer) Vallter: It is, but Pz IV Hydro will be available for purchase via special
offers only
grego34, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: i thought the "Historical mode" was going to be a game playing
option on this patch??Vallter: Nope, it was not announced for 7.0
Vallter
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 23:51:04
Subject: Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169559
eat3reat3r, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: wait...i thought the pz4 hydrostatic was being put on regular
server 
i really wanted these new tanks (as
you can tell from my picture its a real bummer) 
grego34, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: i thought the "Historical mode" was going to be a game playing
option on this patch??
Link on message: #1169559
eat3reat3r, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: wait...i thought the pz4 hydrostatic was being put on regular
server i really wanted these new tanks (as
you can tell from my picture its a real bummer) Vallter: It is, but Pz IV Hydro will be available for purchase via special
offers only
grego34, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: i thought the "Historical mode" was going to be a game playing
option on this patch??Vallter: Nope, it was not announced for 7.0
Vallter
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 23:51:04
Subject: Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169559
eat3reat3r, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: wait...i thought the pz4 hydrostatic was being put on regular
server i really wanted these new tanks (as
you can tell from my picture its a real bummer)
grego34, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: i thought the "Historical mode" was going to be a game playing
option on this patch??
Link on message: #1169559
eat3reat3r, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: wait...i thought the pz4 hydrostatic was being put on regular
server i really wanted these new tanks (as
you can tell from my picture its a real bummer) Vallter: It is, but Pz IV Hydro will be available for purchase via special
offers only
grego34, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:46, said: i thought the "Historical mode" was going to be a game playing
option on this patch??Vallter: Nope, it was not announced for 7.0
Vallter
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 23:24:08
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169441
_AzzA_, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:22, said: What does "new armour system (16 groups+spaced armour)." mean? Any
explanation?
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1169441
_AzzA_, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:22, said: What does "new armour system (16 groups+spaced armour)." mean? Any
explanation?Vallter: They are now more historically accurate - more weakspots, but a bit
tougher in some places.
Vallter
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 23:24:08
Subject: Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169441
_AzzA_, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:22, said: What does "new armour system (16 groups+spaced armour)." mean? Any
explanation?
Link on message: #1169441
_AzzA_, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:22, said: What does "new armour system (16 groups+spaced armour)." mean? Any
explanation?Vallter:
They are now more historically accurate - more weakspots, but a bit tougher in some places.
They are now more historically accurate - more weakspots, but a bit tougher in some places.
Vallter
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 23:24:08
Subject: Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169441
_AzzA_, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:22, said: What does "new armour system (16 groups+spaced armour)." mean? Any
explanation?
Link on message: #1169441
_AzzA_, on Dec 08 2011 - 22:22, said: What does "new armour system (16 groups+spaced armour)." mean? Any
explanation?Vallter:
They are now more historically accurate - more weakspots, but a bit tougher in some places.
They are now more historically accurate - more weakspots, but a bit tougher in some places.
GeneralDirection
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 22:56:39
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169350
Akzam, on Dec 08 2011 - 21:52, said: Thanks. For us already works.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1169350
Akzam, on Dec 08 2011 - 21:52, said: Thanks. For us already works.GeneralDirection: I just received details on the download size for version 7.0's
update. It is 1.2gb and will be downloaded automatically by the
World of Tanks launcher when you start it.
GeneralDirection
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 22:48:59
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169324
Akzam, on Dec 08 2011 - 21:39, said: Updating will be the client or a patch? And nobody knows that. And
what size.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1169324
Akzam, on Dec 08 2011 - 21:39, said: Updating will be the client or a patch? And nobody knows that. And
what size.GeneralDirection: The update will be a patch downloaded by the World of Tanks
launcher. I'll try to get the information for you on the size of
the download, but it shouldn't be much larger than typical version
updates.
GeneralDirection
Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
08.12.2011 22:14:40
Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming Soon
Link on message: #1169194
amazingronaldo, on Dec 08 2011 - 20:37, said: Good ol' Wargaming ... put up a release about something that people
have been asking about for months and then take your sites down for
maintenance. Smoooooooth .... real smooooooth.
World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Version 7.0 Update Coming SoonLink on message: #1169194
amazingronaldo, on Dec 08 2011 - 20:37, said: Good ol' Wargaming ... put up a release about something that people
have been asking about for months and then take your sites down for
maintenance. Smoooooooth .... real smooooooth.GeneralDirection: I agree, darn that unexpected but required maintenance.
The news has been added to a spoiler tag in the original post. You can click the spoiler to read the news while we work on getting the website back up.
The news has been added to a spoiler tag in the original post. You can click the spoiler to read the news while we work on getting the website back up.
GeneralDirection
NA Tourny 5 Draws
08.12.2011 20:40:17
Subject: Contests & Competitions\World of Tanks Tournaments\Challenges\NA Tourny 5 Draws
Link on message: #1168914
Contests & Competitions\World of Tanks Tournaments\Challenges\NA Tourny 5 DrawsLink on message: #1168914
GeneralDirection: I should have a decision on this today. Sorry, this has never
happened (specifically all battles resulting in a draw in the
round), so it's taken a bit to discuss it and come to an amicable
resolution.
Vallter
Players Questions and Developers Answers
08.12.2011 16:49:12
Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Players Questions and Developers Answers
Link on message: #1168261
Chewie, on Dec 05 2011 - 16:20, said: From what I've experienced (and I tried this last night), you can
only filter by vehicles you already own. Thus, I was unable to plan
ahead for future tanks, until I found out the wonderful folks at
www.wotdb.info placed this information under "Modules".
Appletree, on Dec 05 2011 - 16:48, said: This does not work because compatibility check only works for
vehicles player owns.
Only vehicles in garage appears in vehicle selection menu for compatible equipment list.
I'd like to have complete and definitive table of applicable equipment class for each classed equipment and every vehicles combinations in WOT game, including premium tanks and vehicles that I do not have currently.
charfreak, on Dec 06 2011 - 00:43, said: 65 alpha and ~1105 dpm(ver0.6.7) with the same penetration value
ass the soviet 107mm(300 alpha ~2100 dpm) is 'overperforming'?!
yes, the laser accuracy and almost no shell travel time or aim time are nice but most of that was nerfed hard for 0.7.0, as it stands in 0.7.0 the dpm of the credit bought round is ~865, which, for those of you watching at home, is 200 dpm LESS than the stock loltraktor 37mm...
why did it not occur to the devs to address this and increase the damage of the credit bought round??
as it stands in 0.6.7, the konisch (unless trolling with premium rounds) is a unique alternative to the 105 derp when grinding to the top turret to use the 75 l70 and 88 l56 and is better than the 75 l48 simply because 65dmg is better than 0. With 0.7.0 the gun will not ever be used again, as it is entirely pointless with standard rounds and simply 'as good as other guns premium rounds' with the premium rounds.
good to hear that it will be rebalanced when redesignated as a heavy tho
Onyx, on Dec 06 2011 - 00:53, said: Seeing how this answer has one ambiguity, is this per team or per
game? It feels like a per team, but just asking for clarity.
Reklaw, on Dec 06 2011 - 02:15, said: Obviously this is something up for balancing that the developers
won't know exactly, so I'm not asking for stats, but a lot of us
are wondering what the developers want to make the gun found on the
M103 and T110 into, as far as how it delivers its damage goes.
lucky1, on Dec 06 2011 - 06:52, said: Hey will player ever be able to ... Within friends list and as long
as they have been friends for a while... Be able to buy free exp
from each other at 25 exp per gold so I want 25000 xp I need to buy
then exchange 1000 gold to him in return that way wg gets it's
money and we get fun! And u could even put a cap on so like only
3000 worth of gold exp can be exchanged to that friend once a month
then it wouldn't be as easy to exploit... Just a though! 
SpectreHD, on Dec 07 2011 - 08:03, said: Probably the reason for my question in regards to the M36 and M10.
The M18 would probably be no different.
Otto_matic_Reiffel, on Dec 08 2011 - 03:01, said: With the hitbox changes in 7.0, are we likely to see a reduction in
the number of zero damage hits that should have done damage?
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Players Questions and Developers AnswersLink on message: #1168261
Chewie, on Dec 05 2011 - 16:20, said: From what I've experienced (and I tried this last night), you can
only filter by vehicles you already own. Thus, I was unable to plan
ahead for future tanks, until I found out the wonderful folks at
www.wotdb.info placed this information under "Modules".Vallter: We will rework it with other interface changes
Appletree, on Dec 05 2011 - 16:48, said: This does not work because compatibility check only works for
vehicles player owns.Only vehicles in garage appears in vehicle selection menu for compatible equipment list.
I'd like to have complete and definitive table of applicable equipment class for each classed equipment and every vehicles combinations in WOT game, including premium tanks and vehicles that I do not have currently.
Vallter: You can find it on one of our fan-sites: www.wotdb.info
charfreak, on Dec 06 2011 - 00:43, said: 65 alpha and ~1105 dpm(ver0.6.7) with the same penetration value
ass the soviet 107mm(300 alpha ~2100 dpm) is 'overperforming'?!yes, the laser accuracy and almost no shell travel time or aim time are nice but most of that was nerfed hard for 0.7.0, as it stands in 0.7.0 the dpm of the credit bought round is ~865, which, for those of you watching at home, is 200 dpm LESS than the stock loltraktor 37mm...
why did it not occur to the devs to address this and increase the damage of the credit bought round??
as it stands in 0.6.7, the konisch (unless trolling with premium rounds) is a unique alternative to the 105 derp when grinding to the top turret to use the 75 l70 and 88 l56 and is better than the 75 l48 simply because 65dmg is better than 0. With 0.7.0 the gun will not ever be used again, as it is entirely pointless with standard rounds and simply 'as good as other guns premium rounds' with the premium rounds.
good to hear that it will be rebalanced when redesignated as a heavy tho
Vallter: For now we think that nerfing konish is enough. If the statistics
will show that VK 3601 (H) performance decreased more than
necessary, we will perform changes.
Onyx, on Dec 06 2011 - 00:53, said: Seeing how this answer has one ambiguity, is this per team or per
game? It feels like a per team, but just asking for clarity.Vallter: Per team
Reklaw, on Dec 06 2011 - 02:15, said: Obviously this is something up for balancing that the developers
won't know exactly, so I'm not asking for stats, but a lot of us
are wondering what the developers want to make the gun found on the
M103 and T110 into, as far as how it delivers its damage goes.Vallter: The question regarding these vehicles was answered before in this
thread.
lucky1, on Dec 06 2011 - 06:52, said: Hey will player ever be able to ... Within friends list and as long
as they have been friends for a while... Be able to buy free exp
from each other at 25 exp per gold so I want 25000 xp I need to buy
then exchange 1000 gold to him in return that way wg gets it's
money and we get fun! And u could even put a cap on so like only
3000 worth of gold exp can be exchanged to that friend once a month
then it wouldn't be as easy to exploit... Just a though! Vallter: No, we do not plan to have any kinds of XP sales for gold.
SpectreHD, on Dec 07 2011 - 08:03, said: Probably the reason for my question in regards to the M36 and M10.
The M18 would probably be no different.Vallter: I have to do some researches, before answering your question. Do
not worry, I remember about it.
Unfortunately, I do not know much about American TD line (since I'm not a person, who designed them), so this question needs more time than usual ones.
Unfortunately, I do not know much about American TD line (since I'm not a person, who designed them), so this question needs more time than usual ones.
Otto_matic_Reiffel, on Dec 08 2011 - 03:01, said: With the hitbox changes in 7.0, are we likely to see a reduction in
the number of zero damage hits that should have done damage?Vallter: Not for suspension but yes for some modules on different tanks
(previous optics damage, for example). Still 'zero damage' will
mean damaging a module, but not the vehicle itself. So this feature
will be preserved.
Tanitha
Public Test V4 bug reporting.
08.12.2011 13:53:19
Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Testing Grounds (7.0 Public Test V4)\Public Test v7.0v4 - Bug Reporting\Public Test V4 bug reporting.
Link on message: #1168014
Giganaut, on Dec 08 2011 - 07:05, said: here are the bugs that i still see,
one of the 2 new maps,Fjord has a bad map bug, a chunk of it is missing but still can pass through it, just a steep invisible chunk of land just underneath BASE II around E2-3
it's at the river bank. was going to try take a screenshot but nope. never got the chance because i got killed by russian players.
also you need to get the capture counter back in because i hate the base being ninja captured. PLEASE, or atleast just bring back the siren.
EDIT: fjord at F2 = missing chunk of land
Giganaut, on Dec 08 2011 - 07:44, said: oh, and one more thing, after each battle ends (either capture or
eliminated) the result screen wont show up, and the game just stops
there, i was atill able to exit the battle tho, just the result
screen didnt pop up as usual. and that isnt a rare bug.
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Testing Grounds (7.0 Public Test V4)\Public Test v7.0v4 - Bug Reporting\Public Test V4 bug reporting.Link on message: #1168014
Giganaut, on Dec 08 2011 - 07:05, said: here are the bugs that i still see,one of the 2 new maps,Fjord has a bad map bug, a chunk of it is missing but still can pass through it, just a steep invisible chunk of land just underneath BASE II around E2-3
it's at the river bank. was going to try take a screenshot but nope. never got the chance because i got killed by russian players.
also you need to get the capture counter back in because i hate the base being ninja captured. PLEASE, or atleast just bring back the siren.
EDIT: fjord at F2 = missing chunk of land
Tanitha: Hello Giga.
Most of those issue you describe (except the land bug) are probably from copying English files over from 6.7 -> 7.0
You might be running the complete Russian V4 patch, but id bet that on one of the previous versions you copied English files over.
Try installing the new English patch located here.
http://forum.worldof...language-packs/
It should override your incorrect files, and fix the above issues.
Tan.
Most of those issue you describe (except the land bug) are probably from copying English files over from 6.7 -> 7.0
You might be running the complete Russian V4 patch, but id bet that on one of the previous versions you copied English files over.
Try installing the new English patch located here.
http://forum.worldof...language-packs/
It should override your incorrect files, and fix the above issues.
Tan.
Giganaut, on Dec 08 2011 - 07:44, said: oh, and one more thing, after each battle ends (either capture or
eliminated) the result screen wont show up, and the game just stops
there, i was atill able to exit the battle tho, just the result
screen didnt pop up as usual. and that isnt a rare bug.Tanitha:
Реклама | Adv