Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Draschel
HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
06.08.2021 07:27:25
Subject: HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
Link on message: #12890995
Link on message: #12890995
Draschel: that is changing HE mechanics. Not nerfing it. And certainly not
nerfing HE AMMO. Tell me, besides EBR, which HE ammo
was actually nerfed? You need to
understand semantics. Implications. Precise reality. What is
posted as a theoretical, but truthful nevertheless value. Not
practical application. Practical application, we control in the
game. since when has practice ever mimicked theoretical
estimation
Draschel
wg will never balance the game
06.08.2021 07:22:26
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890993
Link on message: #12890993
Draschel: A jag panzer can have its HEAT increased x5 to 2100
penetration, yet it can still shoot a tank gun
barrel, track, angle at over 85 and bounce for 0 An
HE shell with even 1 penetration, can shoot a tank track
at perfect side scrape and deal damage. Not
anymore, good riddance
Draschel
wg will never balance the game
06.08.2021 07:17:43
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890990
Edselman, on Aug 06 2021 - 04:19, said: I'm sorry, but ....
Link on message: #12890990
Edselman, on Aug 06 2021 - 04:19, said: I'm sorry, but ....Draschel: it is.That is why nearly a decade ago, WG reduced HE effects
with the depicted Matilda 16-part armor model. because it was
dealing too much damage. Because non-aimed HE fire from even a tier
6 like M6 firing 90mm HE could deal 100+ damage to is7. After this
patch, HE took a massive hit and really required bore size to
do anything, HE started dealing many 0 damage hitsAnd......not
even a year ago was it? The same patch as stun duration
nerf, they nerfed burst radius too. There are countless HE
nerfs across patch history. Because HE simply does too
much And not only that, HE won't even do what it is told to
do. Full health Lower, is6 shoots HE and deals 200
damage. 13 HP Lowe is6 shoots HE deals 0. There
are many problems with HE. And no single one is solely to
blame for constant change. All are. I have been playing since
2011, with 5 heavy tank 3 marks. In its many damning applications
and concern, HE has been one of the most infuriating things for me
in a heavy gold spam in the form of APCR or
HEAT still follows games mechanics and rules and objects.
Meaning, it still needs aim. Actually, HE has the higher chance to
always deal some damage than premium ammo has the change to always
penetrate. HE even before 1.13 could deal 0, but the chances were
certainly lower than HEAT or APCR not penetrating. HE
doesn't just doesn't fit. Now, it has been made to fit
more so, to conform to game rules other ammo follow. And this
is good for the game. premium spam is more common,
i don't doubt that. But still conforms to game rules and
models. is it a crutch, well in some ways. But
premium spam in an unskilled oaf, can still lead to
common 0 damage games. Hard to get 0 damage games
in 1,400 damage HE jag panzer or type 5.The methods you take,
as a heavy or assault TD, to defend against AP are the same
you use guarding against APCR and HEAT. All that thrown out
the window vs pre 1.13 HE. Broken.
Draschel
STA-1 +Japanese Tier 8+ medium advice plz
06.08.2021 06:13:10
Subject: STA-1 +Japanese Tier 8+ medium advice plz
Link on message: #12890966
Link on message: #12890966
Draschel: While the top speed is slightly low, HP/T
reverse traverse are good. I don't think the mobility is
crap.....Unless you compare every single medium tank to
progetto, Lis, and bourrat. Which is unfair, to say the
least
Draschel
wg will never balance the game
06.08.2021 06:08:25
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890965
Edselman, on Aug 06 2021 - 03:01, said: HE complaints were virtually nonexistent compared to the
amount of complaints about mm, map design, arty, premium ammo, no
weakspots, . . . Don't pretend the HE changes weren't
motivated by the fact that it was sometimes used as a gold ammo
substitute against tanks with no weakspots. They were far down the
radar and only a select few complained about it.
Link on message: #12890965
Edselman, on Aug 06 2021 - 03:01, said: HE complaints were virtually nonexistent compared to the
amount of complaints about mm, map design, arty, premium ammo, no
weakspots, . . . Don't pretend the HE changes weren't
motivated by the fact that it was sometimes used as a gold ammo
substitute against tanks with no weakspots. They were far down the
radar and only a select few complained about it. Draschel: HE spam has existed forever. It existed even when there
were weakspots plenty, on most tanks around, and uparmored no
weakspot tanks weren't common at all. HE nerfs, also were a thing
too, to combat this complaint. Again, not a new phenomenon, that
existed far before no-weakspot tanks were common or general
uparmoring. And as for map design, MM, arty, weaknesses those
commonly are changed too. While your statement isn't
necessarily incorrect, in that HE has been used that way - it is
very presumptuous to state that in a way to
cause others to believe that HE was changed because people were
ONLY using HE this way. HE has many irritating ways, usage,
problems that has led to its changes .....not solely
your single listed misgiving. Motivation for changing it, can
be traced to many different complaints concerning it and its use,
not solely your one way.
DeviouslyCursed
wg will never balance the game
06.08.2021 05:27:24
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890959
gamagrass, on Aug 06 2021 - 03:08, said:
Are you clueless and just born stupid?
Link on message: #12890959
gamagrass, on Aug 06 2021 - 03:08, said: Are you clueless and just born stupid?
DeviouslyCursed: Pretty sure he was born partially there, and then has worked
hard on it ever since.
Draschel
wg will never balance the game
06.08.2021 03:44:11
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890931
Edselman, on Aug 05 2021 - 22:58, said: As long as they are making money, WG really has no reason to change
anything that receives a lot of complaints. Instead,
they naturally spend time reworking everything that not too many
people complain about, like crews and HE.
Link on message: #12890931
Edselman, on Aug 05 2021 - 22:58, said: As long as they are making money, WG really has no reason to change
anything that receives a lot of complaints. Instead,
they naturally spend time reworking everything that not too many
people complain about, like crews and HE. Draschel: everyone complained about the Maus. And type 5. And
artillery. Complaints over 4005.HE has been an issue for years.
seems like they like to nerf alot of stuff people complain
about.
Draschel
Ammo Racked...Again and again
06.08.2021 03:40:08
Subject: Ammo Racked...Again and again
Link on message: #12890930
UncyCreepy, on Aug 05 2021 - 20:39, said: What say you normal people that aren't payed by WG?
Link on message: #12890930
UncyCreepy, on Aug 05 2021 - 20:39, said: What say you normal people that aren't payed by WG? Draschel: lol.......some people really need to read what they type
first, before pressing Enter.
Draschel
STA-1 +Japanese Tier 8+ medium advice plz
06.08.2021 03:19:12
Subject: STA-1 +Japanese Tier 8+ medium advice plz
Link on message: #12890923
Link on message: #12890923
Draschel: play sta-1 as a TD too? It works reasonably well there.I mean,
it has 219 AP pen, and a heck tonne of pen in 275mm HEAT. Nice DPM
too sta-1 is poorly protected. The armor is amongst worst for
tier 8 mediums, so much so that it is extremely
vulnerable to even HE shells. su100 and su12244 have
a reasonable chance to penetrate sta-1 and 2, frontally with
their 60-odd HE pen, nevermind high HE pen users like EB75,
excalibur, setter, and senlac. Artillery with alternate
HE shells and higher pen, are extremely dangerous
too.
DeviouslyCursed
wg will never balance the game
06.08.2021 02:32:27
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890900
Mojo_Riesing, on Aug 05 2021 - 16:05, said: Delicate? Give me a break. I'm sorry but there really
is something wrong in those who think sitting on their fat butt
staring at the screen, clicking stuff, is about "tough" or
"soft". LOL. Its a frickin' game!
Link on message: #12890900
Mojo_Riesing, on Aug 05 2021 - 16:05, said: Delicate? Give me a break. I'm sorry but there really
is something wrong in those who think sitting on their fat butt
staring at the screen, clicking stuff, is about "tough" or
"soft". LOL. Its a frickin' game!DeviouslyCursed: Okay sure. Then maybe stop crying about it since it's just a
game.
DeviouslyCursed
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
06.08.2021 02:17:21
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12890898
NeatoMan, on Aug 05 2021 - 18:18, said: Team battles was supposed to be the skill based mode, but they
screwed it up royally with that idiotic 7/42 rollout. Most people
were simply expecting 7v7 teams matched by skill, not that
ridiculous format.
I'm convinced the problem with WG is that they see randoms as their money making mode, and don't want any other successful mode to draw players away from it.
So the statistics to measure skill and team balance aren't reliable, yet they use them to whine about balance, and as the means to "fix" the MM. That is just plain ridiculous. Yes, I'm going to deride feelings when they are full of contradiction like the one above. "You can't trust the statistics,! We need to balance teams based on the statistics!" I don't know what's going through your head, but it's still plainly obvious that you have no idea what you are arguing about.
Link on message: #12890898
NeatoMan, on Aug 05 2021 - 18:18, said: Team battles was supposed to be the skill based mode, but they
screwed it up royally with that idiotic 7/42 rollout. Most people
were simply expecting 7v7 teams matched by skill, not that
ridiculous format.I'm convinced the problem with WG is that they see randoms as their money making mode, and don't want any other successful mode to draw players away from it.
So the statistics to measure skill and team balance aren't reliable, yet they use them to whine about balance, and as the means to "fix" the MM. That is just plain ridiculous. Yes, I'm going to deride feelings when they are full of contradiction like the one above. "You can't trust the statistics,! We need to balance teams based on the statistics!" I don't know what's going through your head, but it's still plainly obvious that you have no idea what you are arguing about.
DeviouslyCursed: Neato should use his "Super Feelz" to rid all players of
Confirmation Bias and the Dunning Kruger Effect, then alter the
universe itself so Appeal to Popularity is 'Legit
Logic.' Instead Neato just keeps playing with those silly
numbers. What the heck, dude? But basically Mojo is
saying he wants you to sink to the whiner's level and use nonsense
as if it were undeniable fact.
Elias_K_Grodin
Ammo Racked...Again and again
06.08.2021 00:48:31
Subject: Ammo Racked...Again and again
Link on message: #12890864
CAPTMUDDXX, on Aug 05 2021 - 14:17, said: Nope. In fat I can't remember how long it has been since it
happened to me. Certainly not in the past few months.
Link on message: #12890864
CAPTMUDDXX, on Aug 05 2021 - 14:17, said: Nope. In fat I can't remember how long it has been since it
happened to me. Certainly not in the past few months.Elias_K_Grodin: Same here, I got racked when I came back to WoT a few months ago
but that's only because I didn't have "safe stowage" on the
loader. Now I run with "safe stowage" on every tank that has a
loader and no more ammo racking.
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
Ammo Racked...Again and again
06.08.2021 00:48:31
Subject: Ammo Racked...Again and again
Link on message: #12890864
CAPTMUDDXX, on Aug 05 2021 - 14:17, said: Nope. In fat I can't remember how long it has been since it
happened to me. Certainly not in the past few months.
Link on message: #12890864
CAPTMUDDXX, on Aug 05 2021 - 14:17, said: Nope. In fat I can't remember how long it has been since it
happened to me. Certainly not in the past few months.Hey_man_Gneis_shot: Same here, I got racked when I came back to WoT a few months ago
but that's only because I didn't have "safe stowage" on the
loader. Now I run with "safe stowage" on every tank that has a
loader and no more ammo racking.
Elias_K_Grodin
Just 3 Marked My First Tank!
05.08.2021 22:02:18
Subject: Just 3 Marked My First Tank!
Link on message: #12890768
StillMill_1, on Aug 05 2021 - 12:44, said: Super Hellcat. Took 356 games. LOL, Was stupid
expensive silver wise, but fun to achieve something.
Link on message: #12890768
StillMill_1, on Aug 05 2021 - 12:44, said: Super Hellcat. Took 356 games. LOL, Was stupid
expensive silver wise, but fun to achieve something. Elias_K_Grodin: Bravo Zulu tanker! Command sends their highest
regards! "Retreat, hell! We're not retreating, we're
just advancing in a different direction." - Oliver P. Smith, United
States Marine Corps
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
Just 3 Marked My First Tank!
05.08.2021 22:02:18
Subject: Just 3 Marked My First Tank!
Link on message: #12890768
StillMill_1, on Aug 05 2021 - 12:44, said: Super Hellcat. Took 356 games. LOL, Was stupid
expensive silver wise, but fun to achieve something.
Link on message: #12890768
StillMill_1, on Aug 05 2021 - 12:44, said: Super Hellcat. Took 356 games. LOL, Was stupid
expensive silver wise, but fun to achieve something. Hey_man_Gneis_shot: Bravo Zulu tanker! Command sends their highest
regards! "Retreat, hell! We're not retreating, we're
just advancing in a different direction." - Oliver P. Smith, United
States Marine Corps
Jaguarz
Tier 8 tank's versus T95 & Tier 10 tanks
05.08.2021 21:48:13
Subject: Tier 8 tank's versus T95 & Tier 10 tanks
Link on message: #12890761
Hey_man_Gneis_shot, on Aug 04 2021 - 18:21, said: That's impressive that you started about 2 weeks ago and already
logged over 1k battles! Keep it up! My wall has been Tier VI
where I routinely get matched with Tier VIIIs. My thing is being
aware of who is on which side of the flank and knowing that a Tier
VIII can end my battle very quickly if I'm not smart about my
tactics. Working together with your teammates, especially
lights and other mediums, to scope out where the enemy team is
helps a bunch with maintaining position and providing spotting for
you and your teammates. While there are some tanks that I
have a hard time doing any damage to, it's still important to know
where they are and how to get the bigger guns or different ammo
type to train their sights on them. "One hundred rounds do
not constitute fire power. One hit constitutes fire power." -
Merritt Edson, United States Marine Corps
Link on message: #12890761
Hey_man_Gneis_shot, on Aug 04 2021 - 18:21, said: That's impressive that you started about 2 weeks ago and already
logged over 1k battles! Keep it up! My wall has been Tier VI
where I routinely get matched with Tier VIIIs. My thing is being
aware of who is on which side of the flank and knowing that a Tier
VIII can end my battle very quickly if I'm not smart about my
tactics. Working together with your teammates, especially
lights and other mediums, to scope out where the enemy team is
helps a bunch with maintaining position and providing spotting for
you and your teammates. While there are some tanks that I
have a hard time doing any damage to, it's still important to know
where they are and how to get the bigger guns or different ammo
type to train their sights on them. "One hundred rounds do
not constitute fire power. One hit constitutes fire power." -
Merritt Edson, United States Marine Corps Jaguarz: Wow, thats not only abusive to the OP but also to everyone
who gets the misfortune to team with them The very last thing
he needs to be doing is "keeping it up"
churchill50
VZ55 from Common Test
05.08.2021 20:56:20
Subject: VZ55 from Common Test
Link on message: #12890740
Naughticus_Maximus, on Aug 05 2021 - 10:24, said: I didn't see any changes to the tank in the patch notes. What did
WG change?
Link on message: #12890740
Naughticus_Maximus, on Aug 05 2021 - 10:24, said: I didn't see any changes to the tank in the patch notes. What did
WG change?churchill50: They haven't nerfed the VZ55 since it made it to the Common
Test server. WG did nerf it a couple of times while it was still on
the Supertest server. I believe that's what the OP is referring to.
Jaguarz
Forum Advertising
05.08.2021 20:36:44
Subject: Forum Advertising
Link on message: #12890727
DVK9, on Aug 05 2021 - 18:20, said: I use Stands as my blocker and I just clicked on it then block then
the ad and *poof* it is gone
Link on message: #12890727
DVK9, on Aug 05 2021 - 18:20, said: I use Stands as my blocker and I just clicked on it then block then
the ad and *poof* it is goneJaguarz: Thanks for advice Also is Wargaming seeing a hit to
revenue with the specter of crew 2.0 looming? Look at all the
"rare" and popular tanks thats been up for sale as of late, even
the type 59 made an appearance
churchill50
VZ55 from Common Test
05.08.2021 20:22:49
Subject: VZ55 from Common Test
Link on message: #12890723
Link on message: #12890723
churchill50: It's true that the VZ55 won't be meta. But in pubs, it will be
pretty competitive. Being able to dump almost 1k damage in 2
seconds is really powerful if you know how to use it. Combine that
with decent gun depression and trollish turret armor and it will do
just fine. And lets face it, do you really want WG to
introduce something broken or OP enough to oust something in the
current meta? I know I sure don't.
Elias_K_Grodin
Bad MM
05.08.2021 19:51:46
Subject: Bad MM
Link on message: #12890697
Bert_Price, on Aug 04 2021 - 17:21, said: Whats up with the "Blow Out Matches". Win or lose, why so
unbalance?
Link on message: #12890697
Bert_Price, on Aug 04 2021 - 17:21, said: Whats up with the "Blow Out Matches". Win or lose, why so
unbalance? Elias_K_Grodin: It might be a good idea to take a sample of some of the "blow-out"
losses or even some wins to dissect what went wrong (or right) in
the battle. What I've seen often is a flank will engage each
other and after the loss of a few tanks, either side will overpower
the other and that will cause the contested flank to collapse
allowing often light and medium tanks with good mobility to race
around to the other flank catching the remaining allied tanks in a
cross-fire which typically doesn't end well. Speed and
mobility is one of the reasons why tank commanders such as
Guderian, Rokossowski, and Patton emphasized on armored spearheads
to not only punch through the front but use their speed to cover
long distances in a short period of time. In the case of the
game, there are plenty of LTs and MTs (even TDs and HTs) that can
do this and push the flank to create such a crossfire especially on
maps like Mountain Pass and Abbey where loss of a flank = getting
caught in a crossfire. I tend to look at the minimap as often
as I do down range to see what the other flank is up to. When I see
casualties mount, I redeploy to assist. "Never fear your enemy
but always respect them." - John Basilone, United States Marine
Corps
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
Bad MM
05.08.2021 19:51:46
Subject: Bad MM
Link on message: #12890697
Bert_Price, on Aug 04 2021 - 17:21, said: Whats up with the "Blow Out Matches". Win or lose, why so
unbalance?
Link on message: #12890697
Bert_Price, on Aug 04 2021 - 17:21, said: Whats up with the "Blow Out Matches". Win or lose, why so
unbalance? Hey_man_Gneis_shot: It might be a good idea to take a sample of some of the "blow-out"
losses or even some wins to dissect what went wrong (or right) in
the battle. What I've seen often is a flank will engage each
other and after the loss of a few tanks, either side will overpower
the other and that will cause the contested flank to collapse
allowing often light and medium tanks with good mobility to race
around to the other flank catching the remaining allied tanks in a
cross-fire which typically doesn't end well. Speed and
mobility is one of the reasons why tank commanders such as
Guderian, Rokossowski, and Patton emphasized on armored spearheads
to not only punch through the front but use their speed to cover
long distances in a short period of time. In the case of the
game, there are plenty of LTs and MTs (even TDs and HTs) that can
do this and push the flank to create such a crossfire especially on
maps like Mountain Pass and Abbey where loss of a flank = getting
caught in a crossfire. I tend to look at the minimap as often
as I do down range to see what the other flank is up to. When I see
casualties mount, I redeploy to assist. "Never fear your enemy
but always respect them." - John Basilone, United States Marine
Corps
churchill50
Bourrasque in the cash shop.
05.08.2021 19:12:32
Subject: Bourrasque in the cash shop.
Link on message: #12890683
Link on message: #12890683
churchill50: All of the bundles with the ZZ 10 skin show up for
me.
Make sure you're signed into the Premium Shop and then go to the Specials tab and they should show up for you.
Make sure you're signed into the Premium Shop and then go to the Specials tab and they should show up for you.
Elias_K_Grodin
Topography: A New Mode to Boost Your Map Knowledge
05.08.2021 18:19:59
Subject: Topography: A New Mode to Boost Your Map Knowledge
Link on message: #12890665
Link on message: #12890665
Elias_K_Grodin: Of all the things that contribute to players’ performance in World
of Tanks, map knowledge is one of the most indispensable. Many
a player will recall those fatal situations where taking one wrong
direction caused them to return to the Garage before they knew it,
spoiling both their mood and statistics. Having observed these
struggles from new and veteran players alike when getting to grips
with maps, we’ve decided to introduce a new training mode:
Topography. To get a quick idea of what it is and how it will
benefit you, check out the overview below. Get the
detailed intel report here!
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
Topography: A New Mode to Boost Your Map Knowledge
05.08.2021 18:19:59
Subject: Topography: A New Mode to Boost Your Map Knowledge
Link on message: #12890665
Link on message: #12890665
Hey_man_Gneis_shot: Of all the things that contribute to players’ performance in World
of Tanks, map knowledge is one of the most indispensable. Many
a player will recall those fatal situations where taking one wrong
direction caused them to return to the Garage before they knew it,
spoiling both their mood and statistics. Having observed these
struggles from new and veteran players alike when getting to grips
with maps, we’ve decided to introduce a new training mode:
Topography. To get a quick idea of what it is and how it will
benefit you, check out the overview below. Get the
detailed intel report here!
DeviouslyCursed
Bad MM
05.08.2021 18:14:56
Elias_K_Grodin
On Track For Aug. 5-Sept. 5: K-91
05.08.2021 17:45:17
Subject: On Track For Aug. 5-Sept. 5: K-91
Link on message: #12890647
Link on message: #12890647
Elias_K_Grodin: On Track Missions: K-91
MISSIONS BEGIN: Aug. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Sept. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Get the details here!
MISSIONS BEGIN: Aug. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Sept. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Get the details here!
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
On Track For Aug. 5-Sept. 5: K-91
05.08.2021 17:45:17
Subject: On Track For Aug. 5-Sept. 5: K-91
Link on message: #12890647
Link on message: #12890647
Hey_man_Gneis_shot: On Track Missions: K-91
MISSIONS BEGIN: Aug. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Sept. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Get the details here!
MISSIONS BEGIN: Aug. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Sept. 5, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Get the details here!
Elias_K_Grodin
K-91 Fast Track Bundle Offers
05.08.2021 17:42:39
Subject: K-91 Fast Track Bundle Offers
Link on message: #12890646
Link on message: #12890646
Elias_K_Grodin: Finish the On Track to the K-91 and looking to challenge
your newly unlocked Soviet vehicles? Simply purchase one of the On
the Fast Track to K-91 bundles and complete the missions to rack-up
some serious XP. As you progress up the Soviet Tech Tree, the more
missions you can play! Get the details here!
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
K-91 Fast Track Bundle Offers
05.08.2021 17:42:39
Subject: K-91 Fast Track Bundle Offers
Link on message: #12890646
Link on message: #12890646
Hey_man_Gneis_shot: Finish the On Track to the K-91 and looking to challenge
your newly unlocked Soviet vehicles? Simply purchase one of the On
the Fast Track to K-91 bundles and complete the missions to rack-up
some serious XP. As you progress up the Soviet Tech Tree, the more
missions you can play! Get the details here!
churchill50
Referral Program Question
05.08.2021 17:40:11
Subject: Referral Program Question
Link on message: #12890645
Link on message: #12890645
churchill50: Yes, current contracts will extend to the new season. You pretty
much have an indefinite amount of time to finish any referral
contracts (unless WG changes something). The new season is
when WG adds tanks to the reward list, and you also get 2 new
contract slots so you can recruit more people even if past recruits
haven't finished their contract.
DeviouslyCursed
wg will never balance the game
05.08.2021 17:31:34
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890642
stryker105mm, on Aug 05 2021 - 05:48, said: I sent a ticket into wg and asked them if they know how to balance
the game, more than balance a game balance teams, i told them if
they did know just tell me and if they do or do not know how to
balance or make balanced teams and wg sent me the following
back
Mojo_Riesing, on Aug 05 2021 - 06:41, said: Response smells like canned text to me.
Issue isn't whether Wargaming will balance the game, it's whether Wargaming will adjust the way things are done to do a better job of balancing whatever that may be. Not everyone will be happy, nothing new there, but that's how it goes. It's a matter of quality improvement which any modern business should always pursue.
Link on message: #12890642
stryker105mm, on Aug 05 2021 - 05:48, said: I sent a ticket into wg and asked them if they know how to balance
the game, more than balance a game balance teams, i told them if
they did know just tell me and if they do or do not know how to
balance or make balanced teams and wg sent me the following
back DeviouslyCursed: Proof WG hasn't lost all sense of reality yet: They won't let
this idiot touch their game.
Mojo_Riesing, on Aug 05 2021 - 06:41, said: Response smells like canned text to me.Issue isn't whether Wargaming will balance the game, it's whether Wargaming will adjust the way things are done to do a better job of balancing whatever that may be. Not everyone will be happy, nothing new there, but that's how it goes. It's a matter of quality improvement which any modern business should always pursue.
DeviouslyCursed: Oh course it's a canned response. You expect them to take
thee time to actually answer scrubs like OP? Stryker105mm has no
clue how to make a good game. Neither do most of the rejects
complaining about MM, especially when they whine about things the
MM can't ever fix. WoT currently has one of the most fair MMs
out there. We are all treated equal. If you are so delicate you
need a boost, maybe play a single player game where you get to feel
all special in easy mode. Kudos to WG for refusing to cave to
people like OP.
Draschel
FV215b
05.08.2021 08:30:57
Subject: FV215b
Link on message: #12890554
Link on message: #12890554
Draschel: actually, FV215B does not have a cupola issue. half of it is
covered by an autobounce angle, and it is small enough too,
and reasonably thickThe hull is the issue. Horrendously weak LFP
that tier 6 can penetrate, nevermind tier 8. The sides are a giant
problem too, only small portion is listed 102mm. Most is
actually 51mm. And it has these annoying turret shoulders that
bulge out like Pz K VII, both of these completely ruin any
defensive application in corner fighting and baiting
and side scrape. Bad, for a rear turret / gun
tank. why would you '''''''grind'''''' to the 215B?
lol
Draschel
wg will never balance the game
05.08.2021 08:13:49
Subject: wg will never balance the game
Link on message: #12890552
Link on message: #12890552
Draschel: i am surprised he didn't simply add anything about
premium ammunition either. That is his thing
Draschel
HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
05.08.2021 03:51:49
Subject: HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
Link on message: #12890468
Edselman, on Aug 03 2021 - 00:33, said: What are you talking about? WG didn't nerf gold ammunition,
and I doubt they ever will.
Link on message: #12890468
Edselman, on Aug 03 2021 - 00:33, said: What are you talking about? WG didn't nerf gold ammunition,
and I doubt they ever will. Draschel: They did not nerf HE ammo, either. Not since OI and Type
5
Draschel
Can we please go back to when arty was nerfed...
05.08.2021 03:49:47
Subject: Can we please go back to when arty was nerfed...
Link on message: #12890467
Link on message: #12890467
Draschel: And before that, it only went to Hummel and su 8
Draschel
Can we please go back to when arty was nerfed...
05.08.2021 03:48:26
Subject: Can we please go back to when arty was nerfed...
Link on message: #12890466
Link on message: #12890466
Draschel: World of Tanks Closed Beta v.0.6.1.5General:Added new medium tanks:
T-54, Panther II, Pershing. Added new TD "Object" 704. Added new
SPGs: "Object" 212, G-Tiger, G-Panther, M12, M40/M43. Added new
maps: "Ruinberg" and "El Halluf". Added new battle mode: the "Tank
Company Battle". A company of tanks with sum of tiers from 60 to 90
gets into a company waiting queue where it is randomly assigned an
opposing company. Added voice chat based on the Vivox technology.
It works for platoons in random battle, for companies in tank
company battles and for training battle. The feature is still in
testing hence is implemented with minimal settings. In order to use
voice chat, enable it in game settings. Press and hold Q button to
activate voice transmit mode. Added achievements: "Reaper",
"Invincible", "Survivor", "Raider", "Master Gunner", "Kamikaze".
Added medals: Kolobanov's medal, Billotte's medal, Fadin's medal,
Wittmann's medal, Orlik's medal, Oskin's medal, Halonen's medal,
Burda's medal. Added full dynamic shadows. The option is available
through "Enhanced shadows" settings. The shadows are in the testing
mode so there is a possibility of artifacts. Added new interface
for repair and resupply of consumables - "Service": added
possibility to automatically resupply consumables and to repair the
tank after the battle, possibility to quickly replenish
consumables, ability to change the sequence of shells. Added
customizable game controls.
DeviouslyCursed
Bad MM
05.08.2021 03:36:56
DeviouslyCursed
Bad MM
05.08.2021 03:36:14
Subject: Bad MM
Link on message: #12890459
Smooky_Le_chien_husky, on Aug 05 2021 - 00:48, said: a lose for me for 1 month no win and kinda 1 win
from 23 hours of game each days are the same and lose
hours . all of spammer of gold ammo make the game
useless for people want plays free . But I did see one thing from 2
days ago i did win 24 hour of premium by magic i can do
anything on the game after premium over the game are bad . So i
imagine if i paid 50$ and put premium days I will do a little thing
on the game for 24 hours after game will be medium . . Well
the game totally bad bad
Smooky_Le_chien_husky, on Aug 05 2021 - 01:11, said: I did paid with my alts account i can win many of match and i play
with this acount i have i lose many time so same with my alt
i did lose many time after i did paid gold and ad 3 day premium . I
did win many match yee shave a difference . I just feel like
i play casino
Link on message: #12890459
Smooky_Le_chien_husky, on Aug 05 2021 - 00:48, said: a lose for me for 1 month no win and kinda 1 win
from 23 hours of game each days are the same and lose
hours . all of spammer of gold ammo make the game
useless for people want plays free . But I did see one thing from 2
days ago i did win 24 hour of premium by magic i can do
anything on the game after premium over the game are bad . So i
imagine if i paid 50$ and put premium days I will do a little thing
on the game for 24 hours after game will be medium . . Well
the game totally bad badDeviouslyCursed:
Smooky_Le_chien_husky, on Aug 05 2021 - 01:11, said: I did paid with my alts account i can win many of match and i play
with this acount i have i lose many time so same with my alt
i did lose many time after i did paid gold and ad 3 day premium . I
did win many match yee shave a difference . I just feel like
i play casinoDeviouslyCursed: Having a Premium account makes no difference in your win
rate. Neither does running Personal Reserves. You are wrong.
Jaguarz
t57 is not equal to kranvagn
05.08.2021 02:21:01
Subject: t57 is not equal to kranvagn
Link on message: #12890421
golruul, on Aug 04 2021 - 22:36, said: Where are you getting these numbers? tanks.gg shows
3203 for T57 and 2983 for Kran. For hull-down work I'd pick
the Kran, but everything else I'd rather have T57.
Link on message: #12890421
golruul, on Aug 04 2021 - 22:36, said: Where are you getting these numbers? tanks.gg shows
3203 for T57 and 2983 for Kran. For hull-down work I'd pick
the Kran, but everything else I'd rather have T57.Jaguarz: I wouldnt, the Kran is the better tank overall and is more
flexible The T57 had its day as top dog and got nerfed years
back, I dont really see it making a comeback, its still strong,
just not as good as the kran imo, in terms of tanks which need
buffs it should be way down the list.
KRZYBooP
Crew 2.0v2- Practical Feedback
04.08.2021 23:32:43
Subject: Crew 2.0v2- Practical Feedback
Link on message: #12890363
Mikosah, on Aug 04 2021 - 12:11, said: I'll try to be as direct and pragmatic as I can here. If we take it
as a given that crew 2.0 is inevitable, let's work with what we
have. To be clear I still think every possible benefit of the new
system could have been implemented piecemeal into the current
system just as they did with the intuition rework for instance. And
if so the overall result would have been both simpler, more
effective, and more well-received. But the writing's on the
wall, that just isn't what's going to happen. So be it. I
will make a point of saying there are at least a few things the new
system does well. The obvious being that very necessary features
like sixth sense and sound detection are given to everyone by
default. Another is that a starting commander with 3 skills can
easily round up basic utilities like camo, repair, et cetera.
One more is that existing skills have been nicely consolidated, for
instance situational awareness also includes recon and signal
boosting. Likewise repair also improves firefighting, clutch
braking has been merged with offroad driving, and that
there's just the one skill that protects all of the internal
modules. These simple but useful consolidated 'packages' of the
existing skills are good to have. Now here's my concerns:
-The rate of transfer is questionable. A current commander with 4
skills is more or less 'maxed', but in the new system the same
commander is only roughly halfway done training skills, not
even counting the additional 8 prestige levels. A good rule of
thumb ought to be using the superficial rank of the crew to
determine how many skill points to give it. A commander at the rank
of major should remain a major. -The instructor system as a
whole is an eyesore. Frankly we'd be better off without it both for
monetary, aesthetic, and balance reasons. A better way to preserve
unique crews is to simply make them skins, and perhaps just
have them retain more experience during the transfer or
alternatively reintroduce 'zero-skills' integral to that
particular commander. -A number of the new skills
are highly situational and/or conditional. For instance one
improves dispersion but only if stationary for a while, and another
that improves horsepower but only during the first few seconds of
movement. In situations like these, far better to keep skills
simple, passive, and universally relevant. -The 'talents'
often also suffer from the same problem. Besides this, the whole
concept of only unlocking them by focusing 30 points in just one
category is an unnecessary complication. Many of the
categories of the skills seem arbitrary and irrelevant. Perhaps
better if the talents instead become available just by having given
thresholds of total skill points on a commander. -In
particular, using that one skill that reduces RNG as a publicity
stunt to praise the current RNG values was a very low blow.
Reducing the RNG spread in itself is neither an advantage nor a
disadvantage, of course players would instead prefer skills that
are direct performance improvements. That's hardly proof
that the current RNG values are beyond reproach. The devs were
reaching really far to give themselves a reach-around. -One
last concern is that simply because the previous test of crew 2.0
was so ill-received, no matter how perfect the new iteration may be
it'll still be treated with intense suspicion. Any possible benefit
will be rendered counterproductive if the community just isn't
interested. Better to either roll out individual tweaks slowly over
multiple patches or re-brand the entire package.
Link on message: #12890363
Mikosah, on Aug 04 2021 - 12:11, said: I'll try to be as direct and pragmatic as I can here. If we take it
as a given that crew 2.0 is inevitable, let's work with what we
have. To be clear I still think every possible benefit of the new
system could have been implemented piecemeal into the current
system just as they did with the intuition rework for instance. And
if so the overall result would have been both simpler, more
effective, and more well-received. But the writing's on the
wall, that just isn't what's going to happen. So be it. I
will make a point of saying there are at least a few things the new
system does well. The obvious being that very necessary features
like sixth sense and sound detection are given to everyone by
default. Another is that a starting commander with 3 skills can
easily round up basic utilities like camo, repair, et cetera.
One more is that existing skills have been nicely consolidated, for
instance situational awareness also includes recon and signal
boosting. Likewise repair also improves firefighting, clutch
braking has been merged with offroad driving, and that
there's just the one skill that protects all of the internal
modules. These simple but useful consolidated 'packages' of the
existing skills are good to have. Now here's my concerns:
-The rate of transfer is questionable. A current commander with 4
skills is more or less 'maxed', but in the new system the same
commander is only roughly halfway done training skills, not
even counting the additional 8 prestige levels. A good rule of
thumb ought to be using the superficial rank of the crew to
determine how many skill points to give it. A commander at the rank
of major should remain a major. -The instructor system as a
whole is an eyesore. Frankly we'd be better off without it both for
monetary, aesthetic, and balance reasons. A better way to preserve
unique crews is to simply make them skins, and perhaps just
have them retain more experience during the transfer or
alternatively reintroduce 'zero-skills' integral to that
particular commander. -A number of the new skills
are highly situational and/or conditional. For instance one
improves dispersion but only if stationary for a while, and another
that improves horsepower but only during the first few seconds of
movement. In situations like these, far better to keep skills
simple, passive, and universally relevant. -The 'talents'
often also suffer from the same problem. Besides this, the whole
concept of only unlocking them by focusing 30 points in just one
category is an unnecessary complication. Many of the
categories of the skills seem arbitrary and irrelevant. Perhaps
better if the talents instead become available just by having given
thresholds of total skill points on a commander. -In
particular, using that one skill that reduces RNG as a publicity
stunt to praise the current RNG values was a very low blow.
Reducing the RNG spread in itself is neither an advantage nor a
disadvantage, of course players would instead prefer skills that
are direct performance improvements. That's hardly proof
that the current RNG values are beyond reproach. The devs were
reaching really far to give themselves a reach-around. -One
last concern is that simply because the previous test of crew 2.0
was so ill-received, no matter how perfect the new iteration may be
it'll still be treated with intense suspicion. Any possible benefit
will be rendered counterproductive if the community just isn't
interested. Better to either roll out individual tweaks slowly over
multiple patches or re-brand the entire package.KRZYBooP: Thank you very much for your constructive feedback. WG Devs
are asking for us on the Community Team to forward Feedback from
everywhere World of Tanks is on, and any constructive criticism is
welcomed on the long list of feedback.
Реклама | Adv