Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
Ectar
Suggestion: Non premium ammo League
arrow
17.10.2016 11:56:43
 
Subject: Suggestion: Non premium ammo League
Link on message: #13254849

View PostArgedeava, on 16 October 2016 - 09:12 AM, said: Each month make a new league with various challenges and prizes, but without premium ammo. To give an oportunity for players to enjoy an enviroment free of pay-to-win tactics and where aromor really matters.

Ectar:   Interesting idea. You'd have to remove premium consumables too right? As they give an advantage. Also everyone would need to have 50% crews too I guess as one tank with a 4 skill crew against a tank without, is a noticeable difference. Should equipment be allowed too? Players who play for longer will have more equipment available and will have it mounted on different tanks.    You then need to have a way to enforce these rules since it's not possible to see what load out someone has (can only be done via special observer accounts, and even then the accounts can only see equipment and consumable, NOT ammo).   If you want to remove an element you feel is "pay to win" then you need to remove everything which can be boosted artificially as they can all be considered as an unfair advantage.  Heck if you really want it to be a level playing field, then have no equipment, no consumables, 50% crew with zero skill.  Level playing field yes. Fun to play? No.


Ectar
Paris map, the worst ever?
arrow
17.10.2016 11:08:16
 
Subject: Paris map, the worst ever?
Link on message: #13254681

Ectar: Personally I'd be happy to never see Fjords again.


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
17.10.2016 11:07:40
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13254680

View PostUlfhedinn_, on 15 October 2016 - 01:08 PM, said: Re Ectar - I'm mistaken then in the impression I had that NA was leading the stakes in toxicity and negative trends. 

Ectar:   In my experience and related purely to WoT,  EU and APAC/Asia regions tended to be the most toxic due to the large amounts of nationalism trolling and flame baiting. Bigotry was noticeable at all levels be it race, religion, nationality ethnicity. I'm sure the other regions have it similar but I didn't lurk as much on NA as I used to and well, I don't speak Russian.  

View PostDorander, on 17 October 2016 - 12:28 AM, said: I had earlier tried to illustrate this point by challenging advocates of the cross-chat return to reverse the context and consider how their arguments sound if we never had cross-team chat, but it got little reaction, so I'd restate the challenge. Having had cross-team chat, we can state that it does create opportunity if not outright stimulate insulting behaviour, point in fact some defenders of the "return cross-team chat" position have tried to defend it by their supposed right to insult others, so the fact that cross-team chat generates insulting reactions doesn't even seem to be in question.

Ectar:   This guy gets it.  ​ ​


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
15.10.2016 15:39:36
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13247678

View PostUlfhedinn_, on 15 October 2016 - 12:34 PM, said: I just hope the toxicity is was venting, the reason it's in game and is potentially apparently (I'm assuming, I have no data to tell, just my impression) on the increase, at least in certain regions, is also being considered and it's not just a way of ignoring it.

Ectar:   It's nothing to do with certain regions. Players in general are just becoming irresponsible little shits with each generation.  Like I said with Halo 2 everyone had headsets and talked to each other. With Mech Assault 2 you wouldn't launch the battle till you did a mic check with everyone in the room as co-ordination and communication was key.  Now barely anyone talks to each other and if they do in similar games, it's quite commonly found to be insults.   Lack of any serious repercussions and the ability for people to be anonymous = people being [edited].


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
15.10.2016 15:31:25
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13247660

View PostUlfhedinn_, on 15 October 2016 - 12:15 PM, said: ^ Excellently put CmdRatScabies and I think exactly right. I get the impression from Ectar's comments about American's, that I assume relates to NA being the most toxic region, that WG are assuming it's the players that are the problem, when really it's the over stressed / over elitist environment WG have been creating. 

Ectar:   You're looking too deep into that. I was simply echoing a common issue found on Xbox or Playstation multiplayer games where the toxicity is through the roof. In almost all of the main FPS games there is no common cross team chat channels- It's obvious why as that would be an utter troll fest. League of Legends has cross team chat, they have their own issues with teams insulting each other. World of Wacraft launched specifically with cross faction chat being disabled in a smart way by encrpyting it as sorts.  I feel that was a smart move as the PvP servers would be an utter nightmate with people complaining about being ganked/camped/attacked etc etc.   The problem with allowing chat to enemy teams in my opinion, is that in most occasions it's always negative. Humans by nature make a fuss over negative things and people always want to get the last word in.  - Get rekt by arty?  Tell him what you think of that player beforing going back to garage. Out played by enemy player? - Call them a gold ammo noob beforing quiting to garage.   Perfect example of the type of rubbish I won't miss -  People calling me a noob for switching to premium ammo to pen them.  - I'm a being called a noob for recognising in the current situation, I need more penetration and making the move to switch to premium rounds (which I rarely carry more than 5).  - If however I was to just sit there and continually shoot a target I could never pen, surely that's being a noob for not recognising my efforts are useless?.... There is no reasoning with players like that. - They are the same idiots who accuse you of using gold ammo at higher tiers because they don't understand certain tanks use APCR as their normal ammo.   I feel it's not a problem that cross team chat is gone because realistically it was never needed in the first place. I mean really, the only positive people can come up with is to say "hi" at the start of the match to a friend. If you really wanted to compliment a player for something they did or a battle you had, you can send them a message after the battle. It's far more personal and a nice touch.   If you only wanted the cross team chat to remain because you liked to gloat or liked seeing people getting frustrated. That's not exactly helping towards having a positive atmosphere is it?


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
15.10.2016 01:03:01
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13246112

View PostGundam_Zero_X, on 14 October 2016 - 03:06 PM, said: You know in pvp games its a compliment when someone rages at you accuses you for something or insults you right away after you "outplayed" him. You simply transform something toxic to something positive that way. I enjoyed feasting on this, its now been taken away from me. 

Ectar:   Compliment? Not really. It's a common crutch for people to QQ at something they can't prove as in some round about way, it means they can't be the problem. I laughed if someone raged like that sure. But I would also rather I didn't see/hear it. Bear in mind I've been playing games like Halo 2 since it came out Xbox Live, we're talking over 12 years of hearing some of the biggest bullcrap excuses in the world.  10 years ago everyone had a headset on and worked together. Now rarely anyone has a headset and the youth of America would rather scream and you and tell you how many times they slept with your mother.   In World of Tanks, the fact the enemy can't talk to me, has zero impact on my in-game experience or gameplay. It's not about growing a thick skin or just ignoring it, people just shouldn't be [edited]in the first place. That's the problem. It's not the reactions of the people who get offended, it's the behavior of the people setting out to offend them in the first place.    I can totally get behind the fact that people saying "I'm offended by that" doesn't give them any power over others, but I strongly disagree that some people seem to think it's perfectly ok to deliberately set out to offend/wind up/flame bait others and act like it's totally normal behavior. The old "but I'm an [edited]" excuse is a pathetic one.   As I keep telling people who get a bad reaction from crude humor or a badly timed joke. - You have to know your audience.  

View PostLong_Range_Sniper, on 14 October 2016 - 03:14 PM, said:   However, the alternative approach from WG at the moment seems to be "When we want your opinion we'll give you it".   That isn't disagreeing with cross team chat being toxic, but how to address the solution.

Ectar:   Well it's their game, their rules.  They have the metrics to back up their reasoning and it wouldn't have been a decision taken lightly. If you're looking at your chat abuse reports and *plucks number out of thin air* say 70% of chat complaints come from stuff said in all chat - How do you feel you should address that problem?   I mean if was never in from the start, people would only really ask for it just to say "Hi" to someone in the other team.  

View Postatomskytten, on 14 October 2016 - 03:19 PM, said: We can't even tell if the entire enemy team is made up of bots, which they probably are thus the reason for the global chat removal, when we can't communicate with the enemy team. I don't buy Wargamings 'toxic chat reason' - it is just to hide the number of bots in the game which we can observe when communicating with the enemy team. WG has to prove that the game is NOT filled with bots and the only way to do that is to reinstate the global chat function.

Ectar:   I don't even. ​ So if you say; "are you a bot?" and they don't reply. They're a bot?  You're going to have to explain this one further.  What if they just don't want to reply, or don't speak English? 


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
14.10.2016 18:03:48
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13244344

Ectar: "Hey what's your opinion?" "Ok, now let me tell you why it's wrong"   :rolleyes:   It's ok to disagree guys. Nothing you can say however will change my views on this which are based on my personal experiences. Tbh, I love not seeing chat from the enemy team.


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
14.10.2016 17:31:48
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13244181

View PostGundam_Zero_X, on 14 October 2016 - 02:17 PM, said:   I disagree.

Ectar:   Nothing wrong with that.  The good thing about opinions is that sometimes people will have different ones and everyone is entitled to their own opinions. I've played the game for over 4 years and for all the stuff I've seen in cross-team chat, the whine and the venom are far more common than the occasional "hello" or "well played".  Heck even GG was now being used as a troll when it was a stomp from the winning team.   "But I never did that, I only said GG when it was close or when we lost to a good play"  - Well I'm sorry my friends but those cases are the very very small minority.


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
14.10.2016 17:13:38
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13244084

View Postjabster, on 14 October 2016 - 02:04 PM, said:   In your opinion. Why didn't WG give those that disagree the option to keep chat on?

Ectar:   Well because in my opinion, the people giving away team mate positions etc, would still do that and if you're the last person alive in your team for whatever reason, you're still affected by it. Cross-team chat brings more bad things than it does good things.   


Ectar
"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
arrow
14.10.2016 17:01:32
 
Subject: "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Link on message: #13244014

View Postb0d, on 11 October 2016 - 11:40 AM, said: You Cannot Remove Toxic Chat as Demonstrated Below

Ectar:   But you can remove toxic cross team chat. Which worked.   The QQ about gold ammo, insults to arty/TD's/ enemy players in general, and revealing of positions far outweighs the occasion "hello" from the enemy team.


Ectar
can't we have a free name change only ONCE !
arrow
13.10.2016 14:28:40
 
Subject: can't we have a free name change only ONCE !
Link on message: #13238389

View PostMohammad_N_Hamad, on 13 October 2016 - 09:01 AM, said: i'm not trying to bring political and religious  stuff here , but i have to because i get hate , racism and insulted just because my name refers for an ARAB name , i even get this by my own team . i still get hate till this day unless i change it .  i know some players would suggest to get a credit card to pay for changing . but i can't and im not allowed to put my hands on one !!

Ectar:   ​ Sorry to hear about the troubles you're having, and sorry for the attitude and behaviours of some players.  I've just gifted you 2500 gold on your account so you can do the name change no problems if you want.     - Ectar


Ectar
Stammtisch #9 powered by xOlsenx, nice_to_heat_you & Feldgendarm
arrow
04.10.2016 21:34:27
 
Subject: Stammtisch #9 powered by xOlsenx, nice_to_heat_you & Feldgendarm
Link on message: #13195112

View Postcoolathlon, on 04 October 2016 - 03:10 PM, said:   Mojo > U   Should have sticked to writing lies to forums. That would at least be unterstandable. If I want to go Scottish, I stick to people being OBE. (Goldfinger still best Bond!)       War früher Community Manager EU oder EN und hat diesen Sommer "gekündigt" und moderiert jetzt WGL (mit Dakillzor und Still_Mojo) von Kattowitz aus (ist also Angestellter der ESL). Schlimmstes Schottisch und noch nicht den Stimmbruch erreicht.

Ectar:   Danke Danke. Sie sind zu freundlich.  


Ectar
Stammtisch #9 powered by xOlsenx, nice_to_heat_you & Feldgendarm
arrow
04.10.2016 15:51:58
 
Subject: Stammtisch #9 powered by xOlsenx, nice_to_heat_you & Feldgendarm
Link on message: #13193408

View postcool athlon, on 02 October 2016 - 06:37 PM, said: Nobody wants to put time WGL movies, then comes this piece Ecturd and everything is muted.

Ectar:     Vielen dank!


Ectar
SCAMMERS! you have to read this
arrow
03.10.2016 16:53:59
 
Subject: SCAMMERS! you have to read this
Link on message: #13189090

View PostAlwaysLate, on 02 October 2016 - 04:29 AM, said: For all guys who said type cannot be sold . in patch 9.1 there was a bug in wg system that some poeple could hack the game i know 5 people hacked it and they got type 59 plus tons of gold i knew it was illegal so i didnt do it because 3 of them got thier accounts banned but 2 were not banned and they are playing with thier type 59s until this day so i said if it happend once maybe it can happen again but with codes this time and for the 2 accounts that were not banned when i said they hacked gold i meant a lot of it ( around 80-90 k) so yes when you see such things sometimes you believe that you can get a type and the funny thing those guys hacked it for free.....

Ectar:   Please stop lying. Any sympathy people had for your gullibility has now gone out the window with this totally made up story.   There was no hack. You can't prove there was a hack. You're making this all up.     So please, just stop with this silly story. 


Ectar
Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
arrow
30.09.2016 19:22:33
 
Subject: Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
Link on message: #13178312

View Postteafreak, on 30 September 2016 - 09:40 AM, said:   Big words for a reroll who probably didn´t even reached 50% on his first account.   1/10 you can do better.

Ectar:       Reroll?  Top meme my friend, well played.      People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, especially when bringing stats into it and yours are worse that the guy you're trying to mock. ​


Ectar
Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
arrow
30.09.2016 12:35:05
 
Subject: Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
Link on message: #13176481

View PostTaegus, on 30 September 2016 - 09:28 AM, said: That the whole point I am saying all along. WG screwed up with current arty and TD design. TDs (specially those without turret) are obsolete on currect maps and in current meta. Arty is simply broken (note broken not OP). And that is going for years now, while WG only talks and does nothing. I mean most top players on EU already put ahead very good suggestions about how to rebalance arty, TDs, premium ammo and more. But what does WG do. Make sandbox in such a way that if it comes live even close to what it is now, I and most good players will simply quit the game.

Ectar:   Ok but OP's point is that arty is easy to play and doesn't need skill (despite the sarcasm).    Playing any heavy or medium atm and using auto aim with premium ammo and consumables is easy mode. Sitting in a bush redline sniping all match in a TD is easy mode.   Neither of the 2 play styles above requires any real skill to achieve.  All you need to do for the medium or heavy auto aiming is to make sure you're not first on a push.   By now, anyone with a good few thousand battles should know where arty will likely be on a map, and where they can shoot. Yet time and time again they still go there and then complain when they're shot. Especially in a match when they're the first tank spotted. I mean ofc arty is going to shoot you. You expect him to think "I have a shot, I'm not going to take it?"   "Without arty there is no camping" - Yet when arty isn't there, people camp hard knowing that there is no threat. :great:


Ectar
Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
arrow
30.09.2016 12:17:58
 
Subject: Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
Link on message: #13176400

View PostTaegus, on 30 September 2016 - 09:07 AM, said: As for your statements. People avoid arty because its boring to play and pure RNG fest.  

Ectar:   Yes because TD camping is a far far more engaging and skill based system with everyone relying on their superior penetration to tear through tanks and rarely aiming for weakspots?  Come on. TD gameplay is one of the most boring things to do in-game and yet hardly anyone complains about the same.   "To know a man you have to walk a mile in his shoes" - An old saying that means before you can criticise someone, you should try putting yourself in their place first and then seeing how you would deal with things.  


Ectar
SCAMMERS! you have to read this
arrow
30.09.2016 12:03:44
 
Subject: SCAMMERS! you have to read this
Link on message: #13176348

View PostAlwaysLate, on 29 September 2016 - 02:10 PM, said: Hello before 1 day i saw a page on facebook who claimed to sell legit world of tanks codes and it was amazing i checked wot rules and politics and i read that codes are legal 100% so i bought a code from him which did cost me 50$ and he scammed me he did not send anything . all i want to say is if you can report his facebook page thanks and if you can not just NEVER buy from him and try to tell all other people you know about him . i did record the chat we went through i will attach a picture for his page thanks . and by the way yeah i know it was stupid move to spend a 50$ just that way but i said maybe it works who knows. and if you want i can upload the chat recording 

Ectar:   25k gold from the Wargaming site is about $99.99 and you thought Wargaming would really allow someone to undercut them by 50% AND throw in one of, if not the most desirable premium tanks?   Please, everyone take note.   Clan Wars tanks are never ever given out as a code or will make up a code/package Pre-order tanks are never ever given out as a code or will make up a code/package. Type 59 codes are extremely, extremely rare and are only given out at major events like Gamescom. It's a draw for those events and tbh you're lucky if more than 5 are given away over the course of an entire week. Only senior WG staff have these codes.  Buying any code from a website that is not hosted by Wargaming is likely a scam, will likely result in you having either no code or a code that's been used already, and Wargaming won't be able to help you. For all other Type 59 "giveaways"  especially on streams, Wargaming will not give streamers Type 59 codes.  The streamers need to give Wargaming the name of the winner and the tank is added directly to their account. - 


Ectar
Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
arrow
30.09.2016 11:49:36
 
Subject: Artillery is balanced,fair,hard to play and requires a lot of skill
Link on message: #13176281

View Postjohnbuchnat, on 29 September 2016 - 04:47 PM, said: OMG! this is to all arty-haters! stop saying that arty players are noobs without skill and that arty is OP you know arty requires a lot of skill!

Ectar:   Here's a challenge for you.  Play 200 games in a single arty and see if you can get over 60% win ratio on that vehicle. Show us all how easy it is. It's kinda hard to take someone's statement of saying something is easy, when they can't replicate the task themselves over multiple examples/attempts.   Tying shoe laces is easy. Shaving is easy. I know that because I do both tasks multiple times within a week and can show other people comfortably how to do that task.   Arty is RNG, more so than any other class. I don't feel it's easy otherwise everyone would be playing it right? I mean you have an easy game option, that requires little effort, does consistent damage and yet.... Everyone is avoiding it!? I mean don't you want easy credits, easy exp and quick progression through the tech tree? Don't you like killing enemy tanks?   I'm always amazed that for every thread where people QQ about arty being easy (and thus an easy source of credits/free exp) they're not playing it themselves. After all, it's so easy right?     Once in a while people need to get off the arty bandwagon hate, look at their own stats and performances and identify that it's not arty which is making them lose and removing arty or nerfing it hard isn't going to suddenly make you win more games or get better.    


Ectar
Version 9.16: New Sound
arrow
24.09.2016 16:24:01
 
Subject: Version 9.16: New Sound
Link on message: #13152867

View PostMax_Calibre, on 24 September 2016 - 10:08 AM, said: yeah, yeah New Sounds ~ small cheap easy fixes (again     so just how will this improve the bad or plain terrible MM gameplay issues with the Turbo slaughter one sided 4 minute battles Or The zero cover small corridor brawling Maps which 'encourage brawling and die fast' with endless 4 minute slaughter turbo battles
  Wargame? hmm?

Ectar:   Hang on a minute till WG get their sound engineers and mixers to drop what they're working on, go learn to code games instead, and then work on the matchmaking system or map design.   Always amuses me when people complain at stuff like this.  Wat to keep it on topic with feedback about the new sounds. The fact you want something totally different and not relevant to the topic counts for nothing.  You'd be as well as coming in here saying you like Pizza and wish McDonalds could do nachos, when the topic is about Burger King.


Ectar
No chance matches are supposed to be rare ...
arrow
07.09.2016 11:02:24
 
Subject: No chance matches are supposed to be rare ...
Link on message: #13075001

View Postomgdontkillme, on 06 September 2016 - 08:07 PM, said: ... at least the white knight claim it. But then again i just did ... 12-0 win 0-13 lose and on top of that 0-14 lose For a thing which should be "rare" it happens quiet often :<   PS : Those were tier 10 matches.

Ectar:   You played 171 matches in 4 days. How many matches weren't like that?   Did you know that the most common colour of car on the road is red?  It might not actually be red, but now I've told you that, you'll notice red cars more often (and you'll count them) compared to other car colours.   We call that confirmation bias ;)


Ectar
AMX 13 57 without WG camo
arrow
07.09.2016 10:53:47
 
Subject: AMX 13 57 without WG camo
Link on message: #13074966

Ectar: I remember asking about this a while back. The non camo version was given as an exclusive code to some business partners around the time the camo one was released. I think not even half were claimed and the codes would have expired by now.   I know there is an example of someone in NA deleting the special camo one and getting the non camo one restored by CS (not sure why you'd want to go announcing that). That's not something which should happen normally so don't go deleting the tank thinking you'll get a different one restored.


Ectar
Why do you lose battles?
arrow
22.08.2016 06:16:39
 
Subject: Why do you lose battles?
Link on message: #13001905

View PostUlfhedinn_, on 17 August 2016 - 11:35 AM, said: You don't seem to understand (maybe because it's all relative and you're not looking at the bigger situation and how it all fits together, how whatever gain you think you've got is meaningless and valueless compared to the huge gain / stacked advantage others have) but fair enough, I'm talented, educated and qualified in assessing product value, competitor comparison marketing and value propositions used to be my professional job. Not everyone will be able to see through this, the total rip off WG are orchestrating with how they've reconfigured and funnelled the game economies and opportunities, but I've stated the situation as it really is, can't do anything about people who refuse to see it or just can't.   edit - and although it's only my assumption, obviously so as I don't know his reasons, it makes sense for me over Ectar leaving, when you're clued up and objective enough to see how much it's all being over-exploited and sold out, there's no way it's viable on a long term basis, there's no social conscience at all any more, WG must laugh when they hear the term 'enthusiast', there's going to be an increasing amount of dissatisfaction, resentment and casualties as people realise they've been left behind, used, and wake up to this, imo long-term WOT's and WG's brand is screwed.


View PostEctar, on 17 August 2016 - 09:48 AM, said:   Actually I left Wargaming because I was offered a role where I was able to do more casting/hosting, which is something I really enjoy. I thought I was pretty clear about that in my leaving post because I didn't want people assuming/making stuff up.   It was a personal choice for a slight career change. Plain and simple with no drama or shenanigans behind it.   

Ectar:  


Ectar
Epic Missions coming our way guiz....
arrow
17.08.2016 12:48:35
 
Subject: Epic Missions coming our way guiz....
Link on message: #12979513

View Postwsatnutter, on 15 August 2016 - 05:59 PM, said: Let's face it we have gone back 4 years  Or more in the old days we had supercharge ,iscending I paul, Ektar and more who had a authoritive input both in specials and the forums and feedback to HQ now we are back to square one Poor poor specials and the crusts from the table not going off topic but ask yourselves this why would Ectar jump ship  Cos he knew WG ARE going backwards 

Ectar:   Actually I left Wargaming because I was offered a role where I was able to do more casting/hosting, which is something I really enjoy. I thought I was pretty clear about that in my leaving post because I didn't want people assuming/making stuff up.   It was a personal choice for a slight career change. Plain and simple with no drama or shenanigans behind it. 


Ectar
Hot and popular topics within the community
arrow
17.08.2016 12:39:35
 
Subject: Hot and popular topics within the community
Link on message: #12979475

Block Quote If you'd like to see a thread here, please PM me with the details.....

Ectar:   I never got a single PM on that subject.


Ectar
Goodbye friends
arrow
30.07.2016 10:51:49
 
Subject: Goodbye friends
Link on message: #12900566

View Post_Deja_Vu_, on 30 July 2016 - 07:07 AM, said: Call you out? who cares about you, I know what you are, you know that too, I don't need others (from the forum) to acknowledge it.

Ectar:   Know what I am? I'm confused that's what I am. You're still not making any sense.    You claimed I said one thing, you've not been able to show evidence of said quote, the only thing you have brought up in another thread is a quote from the forum rules which can be found on almost all our forums (and even then, it still wasn't written by me).  

View Post_Deja_Vu_, on 30 July 2016 - 07:07 AM, said: You can "dance" it around all you want, you can call me names, you can twist words and sentences, you can angle shoot me all you want here, the fact remains...   Period.

Ectar:   The only fact here is you've made something up, you've been called out on it, you know you don't have a leg to stand on, so now you're just going for classic distraction and not making any sense.  


Ectar
Goodbye friends
arrow
29.07.2016 21:35:17
 
Subject: Goodbye friends
Link on message: #12898972

View Post_Deja_Vu_, on 27 July 2016 - 06:50 PM, said: Hey, don't up yourself. Please! You won't be missed, and you'll always be remembered by your infamous quote a forum user used to had as signature, stating in short something like: "If me, the MODERATOR feel like it, I can ban right and left, 'cause I CAN, f*** the rules, I'm GOD itself". Can't find it to quote it word by word now, it seems you banned that user, or erased his posts.

Ectar:   You seem to have a real chip on your shoulder about forum moderation, which is something I never did. At most I locked threads *before* moderation was required.  What you're claiming I said in this quote from you directly is completely false and you know it, hence why your replies now don't make much sense.... For example your latest reply:  

View Post_Deja_Vu_, on 29 July 2016 - 04:11 PM, said: Kind of late to your own show...   I'm going to be brief: please Ectar, dig up the right stuff, that, you just bring up, is 2nd top of your quotes, please. If not, you should had let go, and never come back with a reply.   Keyword here: spine...  

Ectar:   Late to my own show? Laddie you're the one coming in over a month late to the thread. Heck you posted  27 days after I had already left when realistically I'd have no reason to reply so I guess it's the best time for someone to say something snarky and not expect to be brought up on it. You talk about having a spine when you're the only here making accusation long after someone has left, then not having any evidence to back up your claims?  Interesting way of getting your point across and getting people to believe you there.   What is it you once said to me before?  "It's Friday, Friday, gotta get down on Friday, everybody's looking forward to the weekend weekend!"  I can't find that post word for word but I'm sure you said it...... Kinda easy to make things up like that isn't it? ;)   Again if you're going to call me out, at least have the facts correct and content there for everyone to see. I'm happy to talk about any concerns or complaints people had with my posting, but dear god at least bring up something I actually said and not something you want to project onto me.


Ectar
Goodbye friends
arrow
29.07.2016 16:12:37
 
Subject: Goodbye friends
Link on message: #12897315

View Post_Deja_Vu_, on 28 July 2016 - 05:21 PM, said:  My post and the reply that followed are the perfect example of what he did and caused to this forum.

Ectar:   Ok, lets dance then shall we... In the past I wouldn't take the bait for something like this but I feel it's time to tango.   You're not actually quoting me word for word though are you?  You're just filling in blanks with what you want to claim I said to try and justify a little bit of bitterness. Whilst some posts are removed from the forums due to the threads being deleted/moved to Junkyard, you should be able to find all my posts here - http://wot-news.com/track/index/eu?dev=Ectar  That's right, every WG employee posts is archived/tracked so anyone can look through when something was said.   I'm more than happy to look back to check what you claim I said. I feel it's first important to show a little context here regarding my exchange with my fellow forum user.   Topic created 22nd March 2015 - My reply is on the 26th of March 2015   That's what's called a friendly warning. I advised a player something, the thread was closed, that was it.   The 2nd thread you want to quote is sadly removed from the forums, but it's archived on wot-news so let's look at it. (as the same player is involved despite me trying to help him avoid being sanctioned)   http://wot-news.com/track/post/eu/Ectar/1427456558  

Block Quote Block Quote  TankMilitia, on 26 March 2015 - 08:03 PM, said: Did EVER Ectar ever bothered to see if that moderator is in some personal well timed vendetta against some forumers here (by the numbers of bans/ warnings) awarded?   Ectar, on 27.03.2015 13:42:38 said:   In your situation no.   Your previous post targeted a specific moderator who hasn't been responsible for even half of your warnings so there was no need to speak him.  Every single one of your past 50 topics is either a complaint at the game, complaint at Wargaming staff or a complaint against other players. Not one topic has you talking about anything positive, constructive or aimed at having an actual discussion. I'm amazed that you can't see you're your own worst enemy. As I told you earlier, read the forum rules and understand them. If you continue posting topics where all you're doing is complaining about stuff with no evidence ( for example you do this a lot claiming XYZ happened to you in a match and never provide a replay), then I'll make sure your next sanction gives you a longer forum vacation. By reading through your past topics I honestly don't understand why you're still playing the game if you claim to hate it so much. Please consider your next topic carefully because you're on thin ice here sir.   Thread closed for the following reasons: 2.5 Off Topic, spamming and trolling   This category includes:
• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums
• Causing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other posters
• Making non-constructive posts, or creating threads on non-constructive topics  

- Ectar

Ectar:   Ectar, on 27.03.2015 13:42:38 said:   In your situation no.   Your previous post targeted a specific moderator who hasn't been responsible for even half of your warnings so there was no need to speak him.  Every single one of your past 50 topics is either a complaint at the game, complaint at Wargaming staff or a complaint against other players. Not one topic has you talking about anything positive, constructive or aimed at having an actual discussion. I'm amazed that you can't see you're your own worst enemy. As I told you earlier, read the forum rules and understand them. If you continue posting topics where all you're doing is complaining about stuff with no evidence ( for example you do this a lot claiming XYZ happened to you in a match and never provide a replay), then I'll make sure your next sanction gives you a longer forum vacation. By reading through your past topics I honestly don't understand why you're still playing the game if you claim to hate it so much. Please consider your next topic carefully because you're on thin ice here sir.   Thread closed for the following reasons: 2.5 Off Topic, spamming and trolling   This category includes:
• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums
• Causing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other posters
• Making non-constructive posts, or creating threads on non-constructive topics  

- Ectar   I've bolded the part you want to misquote so badly _Deja_Vu_.  Once again it's a warning to a player. It's not me acting like god. No forum sanction was applied to that. It was me telling a player to stop what he was doing or it's going to land him in trouble later. I even list the forum rules he's breaking and again for the 2nd time in 2 days ask him to read them, understand them, and stop posting the type of content he's doing which is getting him in trouble in the first place.   Have a grudge against me all you like dude, but if you're going to start the "Ectar said" you better be sure you know what you're talking about.    

Block Quote  TankMilitia, on 26 March 2015 - 08:03 PM, said: Did EVER Ectar ever bothered to see if that moderator is in some personal well timed vendetta against some forumers here (by the numbers of bans/ warnings) awarded?

Ectar:


Ectar
Farewell Ectar
arrow
27.07.2016 14:07:15
 
Subject: Farewell Ectar
Link on message: #12885497

View PostTitusLartius_U4G, on 27 July 2016 - 09:47 AM, said: But he also has the point. You (not just you personally but whole WG Eu staff) are all the time giving some unprofessional statements, personal views, comments. While you all have that WG sign next to your name, people will see that statement, your personal statement, as its WG's. Like it or not but you are representing company you work for. 

Ectar:   No he doesn't have a point and what you'r talking about is not the same as what he is saying. He claimed I had views on a certain subject whereas the truth was I've never mentioned anything on that topic.    Whenever I posted in the past I knew fine well my comments could always be quoted as "Ectar from Wargaming said", which is why I always made the point to answer something as specifically as I could, or to be vague when something wasn't confirmed. I wouldn't give my personal opinion on topics because my opinion didn't matter, I was a Wargaming employee first so I always had to side with the company publically.  Behind the scenes however I was frequently pushing through the player's side of things and getting into some pretty heated discussions on certain topics.    - Just because change doesn't happen immediately it doesn't mean no one is listening nor fighting your side.


Ectar
Farewell Ectar
arrow
27.07.2016 12:04:29
 
Subject: Farewell Ectar
Link on message: #12884757

View PostInDeutschlandPride, on 27 July 2016 - 08:42 AM, said:   You gave me a permanent forum ban for saying that islam is totaly okey with child sexslaves in a thread about islam or something similar. You called me a bigott. So yes you have talked about it. And i am glad you are gone.

Ectar:   You're misdirecting. Where have I ever stated my views? Talking about religion is against forum rules. If you were doing that and sharing your views that no one cares for, then yes you would have likely been sanctioned.   You're entitled to your opinions of course , but on these forums you don't have the freedom to talk about what you want. There are forum rules here that all player have to follow.   I fail to see how you can presume to know my views on that subject but I guess when you've had your bitter pills for breakfast it's easy to make stuff up to suit your point of view, no matter how narrow it may be.      


Ectar
Farewell Ectar
arrow
27.07.2016 11:04:00
 
Subject: Farewell Ectar
Link on message: #12884404

View PostGhostintheTenk, on 26 July 2016 - 03:48 PM, said: I really had high hopes of that last feedback-thread he started (the one that had ~50 pages full of various things to fix and improve), but apparently, it was all pointless and wasted effort. Again.

Ectar:   It wasn't pointless, it was something I did on my own initiative to gather feedback and then sandbox happened which means the feedback became redundant as the main points were already things being considered/tested on sandbox.  MM balance, Tank balance, arty impact in battles, premium ammo/armour being worth something were the main points.    

View PostGhostintheTenk, on 26 July 2016 - 03:48 PM, said: But yes, even though he was pretty much inactive most of the time, he still was the only competent guy within the WGEU staff. Good news: It can't get worse.

Ectar:   When I started 4 years ago, I was posting frequently when it was just myself and supercharge, I then continued to post a lot when Ipaul72 joined as a fellow coordinator. Iscending joined later as a coordinator also and I was still the most active poster. Brynd then joined as a Community Manager and I was then promoted to Community manager too. Dakiris then joined us for a short while before he became the social media manager.  During that time I still posted almost daily. Iscending later moved on to the console specialist with Ipaul72 leaving. Grimbru and Erissa later joined and again I was still the most active poster. I deliberately stepped back during the past year to allow the three newer coordinators to become more known within the community.  I had other projects I was to work on and stepping back from the forums was required as too many times players name dropped me rather than the other guys in the team. You can still see how frequently I posted on my profile history when the only real gaps coming from earlier this year when I was working on various project stuff.   I was active for 4 years but you can't seriously expect that for all of those 4 years the only think I would do is post on the forums, especially when there was at least always 1 or 2 other members of the community team.  Back when I started it was also a much much smaller playerbase and I only covered World of Tanks so doing something like 30 posts a day was easy.  Now the guys in the team cover 5-6 games, the social media for those games, the forum reporting of those games and then any projects on top of that (such as planning/executing things like Tankfest, MGT-20 truck events, community events in other regions).   

View PostInDeutschlandPride, on 27 July 2016 - 04:53 AM, said: Ectar was "special" so to speak. Would not surprise me the slightest if he went on and become the new IS PR agent in europe considering his stand on that particular religion.

Ectar:   My stand on IS? This is possibly the funniest "complaint" I've ever read about me on the forums in over 4 years. Since when have I ever talked about religion ever on the forums, social media, or in person to anyone?   You have the floor here sir. Show me and the internet my stand on this particular religion so everyone knows.  I'm dying to know myself how you seem to know my views on this topic.     


Ectar
►Tankfest 2016 | Best Tankfest Yet!
arrow
08.07.2016 11:37:03
 
Subject: ►Tankfest 2016 | Best Tankfest Yet!
Link on message: #12809091

View PostDesyatnik_Pansy, on 06 July 2016 - 01:37 PM, said:   The only reason I recall that extremely heavy rain is because when we (my mother, brother and I) were walking in to get out of it I saw poor Ectar get his cup of coffee/tea/whatever accidentally knocked by someone and spill a bit. :P

Ectar:   It was Irn Bru :(


Ectar
Tankfest 2016
arrow
30.06.2016 11:56:44
 
Subject: Tankfest 2016
Link on message: #12776394

View PostODST21, on 28 June 2016 - 12:00 PM, said: Can anyone else confirm if orange is for PC and yellow is for console? Cheers :)  

Ectar:   The Yellow is console only. It doesn't matter if you're Xbox or Playstation.   Orange is for World of Tanks PC version.   Apologies for the confusion this caused, we made up about 50% of the goodie bags on Thursday evening and then realised the yellow cards (console) didn't actually say they were console codes. Obviously this is an error but not much we could do at the event and the error was reported to our Marketing team asap.  For the rest of the bags we didn't put the yellow codes inside and instead the person who was assisting players at the console area, gave players the code personally so that only people playing the console version, got the console code.   Again apologies for any code issues, it was totally out of our hands.


Ectar
Tankfest 2016
arrow
27.06.2016 20:56:49
 
Subject: Tankfest 2016
Link on message: #12764999

View PostODST21, on 27 June 2016 - 05:13 PM, said: One thing I am wondering now is when I will receive my Tankfest emblem. I put in my email and username, but have not received an emblem and it's been a couple of days since I went now. I'll continue to be patient, and hopefully it will be added soon! If anyone has any questions about the loot then let me know :)

Ectar:   Well not until at least the staff are back in the office! ;)  We travelled back today and most of us have tomorrow off to account for the missed weekend.  It should be no longer than about the end of the week.


Ectar
Goodbye friends
arrow
22.06.2016 12:44:29
 
Subject: Goodbye friends
Link on message: #12739863

View PostPablo_Rob, on 16 June 2016 - 09:34 PM, said: Dude, I was over the moon when I realised there was a fellow Scot 'on the inside', and you showed that as ambassadors, Scots are in a class of their own.  We'll miss you.   ...and seriously, who's going to annoy them about getting a Scottish flag in game now!!!...   Good luck in your new adventure

Ectar:   I'll still poke our Producers about getting the home nation flags added  ;)  

View PostGrandorf, on 16 June 2016 - 11:03 PM, said: Ectar had no humor.

Ectar:    

View Postgekados, on 17 June 2016 - 12:59 AM, said: Sadly, i will remember Ectar only as a community manager that ignored, mislead and even lied the players. Anyway, farewell.

Ectar:   Well just shows you can't please everyone, and even if you did please everyone, someone would dislike that.  

View PostJigabachi, on 18 June 2016 - 05:20 PM, said: One last thing... What about your last "project", the feedback-poll-thread? Would be a shame if all that was completely pointless... :(

Ectar:   Shorty after I started that, details about the Sandbox server and multiple other things were announced internally. It kinda made that thread totally redundant (and that's what I get for asking for feedback on my own without checking with producers 1st).   On an early pass players were most vocal about:   Arty rebalance and frustration at it's 1 shot kill mechanics. XVM removal or some kinda of api restriction or stat hiding ability (like Warships allows) Matching making A global policy on mods that isn't different per region.   Improved tutorials and map rotation were next after that.  - Pretty much all of these points will be addressed at some point during the Sandbox most likely.  As for how they'll be tackled I can't say, however the Sandbox is the first steps to make some big changes to the game and for players to be a part of those changes and provide feedback as we see what works and doesn't work.


Ectar
Frontline News
arrow
20.06.2016 01:07:03
 
Subject: Frontline News
Link on message: #12729634

View PostIINekeII, on 19 June 2016 - 09:10 PM, said:   dont hate pls

Ectar:   This is one of the greatest things I have on seen for a while and it gives me a great idea for something to do in the future.... :great:


Ectar
Goodbye friends
arrow
17.06.2016 00:54:35
 
Subject: Goodbye friends
Link on message: #12716667

View PostPinkyDK, on 16 June 2016 - 09:12 PM, said: Thank you for a good job - earning respect in a community like you is a big task thinking of the many stupid things WG have put in front of players for many years... If you are not allowed to write the name of your new employer I would still be interested in what kind of job you are pursuing?   PinkyDK

Ectar:   It's a personal choice to hold off saying where I'm going for now. That's only because I want to focus on what I still have to do here. There will be plenty of time to talk about what I'm doing next and who with. :great:


Ectar
Goodbye friends
arrow
16.06.2016 18:25:47
 
Subject: Goodbye friends
Link on message: #12714405

Ectar: Hello folks, There never really is a good time to say something like this, and it's took me a few attempts at writing it. Without further ado I’ll just cut straight to the point. One week after Tankfest 2016 I will be leaving Wargaming.net. 
Why has this came about? Well recently I’ve been working on various different projects to broaden my skillset and work on various community initiatives. With one of those projects I found that I really enjoyed doing something different and wanted to do it more, this has resulted in getting an offer I simply couldn’t turn down. I’ve been working with Wargaming.net for the past 4 years now, starting out as a Community Coordinator and then becoming a Community Manager. From my first post back in May 2012 it’s been a rollercoaster full of ups and downs. You’ve shown me all how passionate you are about our games and how much they mean to you. From watching the World of Tanks community continue to grow, to watching the Warplanes, Console, Warships and Blitz communities grow from scratch to get to where they are now, it’s been a pleasure to be involved in it all.
I feel especially privileged to have played a big part in the Community Contributor initiative, helping grow and promote the various Youtubers and Streamers we have who make content for our games. I’m proud to see streamers like CirconflexesRitaGamer and Quickybaby get partnered with Twitch and grow their communities to where they are now. Lots of other great streamers are now following in their footsteps and have also got partnerships and grown their respective communities. I would like to say a special thanks to everyone for your energy over these past years and thanks especially to those people who would send random PM’s with things like “Hey man, keep it up” or “Hey thanks for being around” etc.  You guys have no idea just how much little things like that really lift up someone’s spirits and make a rough day just fade away. It was always impressive to see when people noticed my posting style change and took it upon themselves to message me something positive. As I have Tankfest to prep for and various other tasks to do and hand off before I leave, this will be my last post on our forums other than to answer any questions in this thread. I’ll try my best to answer all existing PM’s I have waiting for a reply. If you don’t get a reply by the end of this month then please message Cynd3r, Ph3lan, MrConway and Brynd. It’s never easy moving on, I’ve never had to write to a wide audience to say goodbye like this and I have no idea how it will be taken or even if it will be noticed much.  As I’ve worked with you all for so long I felt it was right to say goodbye and I also wanted to quash any rumours that may come about as to where or why I’ve gone.

Good luck out there on the high seas and on the battlefields. It’s been a pleasure to represent you all. Sincerely
Ectar


Ectar
Sandbox current progress.
arrow
15.06.2016 13:30:49
 
Subject: Sandbox current progress.
Link on message: #12708113

View PostlnfernaI, on 15 June 2016 - 08:44 AM, said: I might just retire from the game,if those new mechanics get implemented.  

Ectar:   For every player who thinks "1st iteration of sandbox stats/changes" means "unchanged content coming for next content patch"   I'm going to buff arty.


Ectar
Tankfest 2016
arrow
15.06.2016 13:15:01
 
Subject: Tankfest 2016
Link on message: #12708032

View PostTheSpearman, on 14 June 2016 - 02:05 PM, said: Please learn from last year, and don't make people queue for 90 minutes to get the free goodies. It just doens't work, and wastes a major chunk of peoples day out.

Ectar:   You have an entire event to attend, if your only desire to come to the booth is to get freebies I'm afraid to say that once again they'll only be for people who visit the booth and play the game. If we didn't do it that way, we'd just have people walking about handing out bags at random. - This is something we never do at any event.  The goodie bag is a thank you for playing the game/visiting the booth.  

View PostTheSpearman, on 14 June 2016 - 02:32 PM, said:   Everyone was handed a card with an invite code with Churchill III walking in the door.   If you played a single round of WoT at their stand in the Tamiya hall, you received a coupon for a bag, inside was a card a Chi Nu Kai, and various bits and bobs, bottle opener, lanyard, key chain of the sixth sense icon. The goodies were neat little things, but the wait to play a single round was 90+ minutes, which takes a large bit out of someones day. In past years they just gave out the stuff directly. Given the visitor numbers at Tankfest now, this may play a part in their approach, but this seems like the worst possible compromise.

Ectar:   I've attended 3 out of the 4 previous years.   2012 - Small booth with only 15 PCs. We gave away only a t-shirt to players. That was it, just a t-shirt. No codes, bags or other stuff. 2013 - I wasn't there, I'm sure there was still a queue however. 2014 - People still had to queue, it was the first year we had the truck.  2015 - People queue'd to play, we had timed sessions and when finished players got the token to get the goodie bag from the truck.   Everyone else is in the same boat with regards to how they get the goodie bag.  I appreciate that there may be other things you want to do on the day and I can only advise   We try to move the queue on as quick as we can but each year more and more people want to come by and try the game/play on the demo accounts.    This time there will be no back and forward as the goodie bags will be at the same place, and hopefully the queues won't be as bad as we'll effectively have 3 queues (tanks PC, tanks console and warships).   

View PostJagodinac1, on 14 June 2016 - 03:16 PM, said: Where is ShipTheNutz? Why there is no DezGamez?

Ectar:  

View PostCiupryanski, on 14 June 2016 - 04:20 PM, said: Wow the spanish are more that romanian players on wot,why don't invite Orzanel?

Ectar:   We invited multiple different streamers and Youtubers from across Europe (especially the most popular).  Sadly a good few of them were not able to attend due to personal reasons.


Реклама | Adv