"Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails
Дата: 15.10.2016 01:03:01
Gundam_Zero_X, on 14 October 2016 - 03:06 PM, said: You know in pvp games its a compliment when someone rages at you
accuses you for something or insults you right away after you
"outplayed" him. You simply transform something toxic to something
positive that way. I enjoyed feasting on this, its now been taken
away from me. Ectar: Compliment? Not really. It's a common crutch for people to
QQ at something they can't prove as in some round about way, it
means they can't be the problem. I laughed if someone raged like
that sure. But I would also rather I didn't see/hear it. Bear
in mind I've been playing games like Halo 2 since it came out Xbox
Live, we're talking over 12 years of hearing some of the biggest
bullcrap excuses in the world. 10 years ago everyone had a
headset on and worked together. Now rarely anyone has a headset and
the youth of America would rather scream and you and tell you how
many times they slept with your mother. In World of Tanks,
the fact the enemy can't talk to me, has zero impact on my in-game
experience or gameplay. It's not about growing a thick skin or
just ignoring it, people just shouldn't be [edited]in the first
place. That's the problem. It's not the reactions of the people who
get offended, it's the behavior of the people setting out to offend
them in the first place. I can totally get behind the
fact that people saying "I'm offended by that" doesn't give them
any power over others, but I strongly disagree that some people
seem to think it's perfectly ok to deliberately set out to
offend/wind up/flame bait others and act like it's totally normal
behavior. The old "but I'm an [edited]" excuse is a pathetic one.
As I keep telling people who get a bad reaction from crude
humor or a badly timed joke. - You have to know your audience.
Long_Range_Sniper, on 14 October 2016 - 03:14 PM, said: However, the alternative approach from WG at the moment
seems to be "When we want your opinion we'll give you it".
That isn't disagreeing with cross team chat being toxic, but
how to address the solution.Ectar: Well it's their game, their rules. They have the
metrics to back up their reasoning and it wouldn't have been a
decision taken lightly. If you're looking at your chat abuse
reports and *plucks number out of thin air* say 70% of chat
complaints come from stuff said in all chat - How do you feel you
should address that problem? I mean if was never in from the
start, people would only really ask for it just to say "Hi" to
someone in the other team.
atomskytten, on 14 October 2016 - 03:19 PM, said: We can't even tell if the entire enemy team is made up of bots,
which they probably are thus the reason for the global chat
removal, when we can't communicate with the enemy team. I don't buy
Wargamings 'toxic chat reason' - it is just to hide the number of
bots in the game which we can observe when communicating with the
enemy team. WG has to prove that the game is NOT filled with bots
and the only way to do that is to reinstate the global chat
function.Ectar:
I don't even. So if you say;
"are you a bot?" and they don't reply. They're a bot? You're
going to have to explain this one further. What if they just
don't want to reply, or don't speak English?
I don't even. So if you say;
"are you a bot?" and they don't reply. They're a bot? You're
going to have to explain this one further. What if they just
don't want to reply, or don't speak English? "Toxic Chat" Scam and Other WG Fails














