Developers posts on forum

DeviouslyCursed:  

DeviouslyCursed:  You asked me if I was lying again, which means you are claiming I lied before. Then you accused Kliphie of making things up "as usual," so basically saying he lies all the time. It's okay though. If you're so clueless you can't figure out the HoF in the game or the webpage, you're probably too clueless to understand what you're saying most of the time anyway. And if you haven't looked yet, you're too late. I played last night and won "only" 63% of my games, so I'm off the top 100 now.

DeviouslyCursed: I used to block only spammers, but the client has taken care of that mostly now. I really don't Blacklist anyone now.

Einzelganger7: I will not quit.

DeviouslyCursed:  What the F are talking about? You don't like quick victories, which MM can't fix. You don't like quick losses, which MM can't fix. You don't like games that are close, because the people left alive (usually TDs/arty or very low health tanks) are smart enough to know that who ever pushes in that scenario usually loses, so it draws, and MM can't fix that either. But you're going to avoid high tiers until they change MM... Your post is about as smart as saying you and your clan won't play high tiers until WG has the MM make it rain and end the mid-west drought. EDIT: If you post was sarcasm, you need to do it better. If you were trying to emulate the ignorance of the SBMM fans, good job I guess. If it was neither then just

DeviouslyCursed:  

DeviouslyCursed:  People are calling you stupid because you don't know what you are talking about. There are no mods, illegal or otherwise, that do what you are accusing the other players of doing. So you can educate yourself a little bit, here are some things to take with you. There are no mods that let you shoot through terrain/buildingsThere are no mods that take away RNGThere are no mods that make you auto penThere are no mods that increase your vehicle's stats like penetration, damage, shell velocity, armor, etc.There are no mods that let you see unspotted enemy tanksThere are no mods that guarantee module or crew member hits/kills Now, having said that, there are some mods that WG has determined to be cheating, to include: Mods that show 3D internal module positionsMods that change destructible terrain to tall trees being knocked over when terrain is destroyedMods that show destroyed terrain on the mini-mapMods that show the 'ghost' of a tank that is no longer spottedMods that show dead tanks as white (not sure if this one is still illegal)Mods that have an aimbot that leads a target based on move speed (but the mods still doesn't eliminate RNG, btw)Mods that remove the graphics for bushes/trees So when WG says they banned people, that doesn't give support to your crazy assertions of what cheats can do. It just means people got caught using some of these actual banned mods. And btw, good players don't need most of these mods. The one thing that may actually help them would be the destructible terrain mods. It is funny though. Even after all these years if I get into a situation where it is 1 v 1 at the end and there's multiple paths I can take to approach the enemy, (as long as it's not going to get me spotted and I don't have too long of a reload) I will start heading one direction and the shoot an object on the alternate path I didn't take, just in case they have one of the destructible terrain mods. 

Jaguarz: all I know for sure is anyone who shoots me is cheating, theres just no other possibility.......

Jaguarz:  The developers absolutely want this yes, because it means bonuses and share options, the owners of the game however wont feel the same because they dont need a fast buck  and would rather WOT keeps printing money and buying them new yachts and private jets year in, year out. WOT is a different beast to any of EAs offerings which are shameless pump and dump schemes which please the shareholders who follow the same pattern, WOT is basically privately owned. I would be amazed if the accountants let the developers push this joke to live.

Jaguarz:
Hes an obvious troll not posting from his main account, probably because it was forum banned, why fall for the bait?

Jaguarz: You could barely call it tweaked, certainly not a rework, they "fixed" some things which were clearly bugs, altered a small value here and there and are presenting it as if they have made significant changes. This is worse then Rubicon, theres no way to balance this systems values without rendering the system entirely pointless anyway, I dont care if they push this live or not, I could do with playing something else but its nothing but an attempt at a soulless cash grab and where other games, even those from EA have moved away from literal pay to win this game is trying desperately to plunge into it. 0/10, would spend my time on something else.

Jaguarz: The developers running things are not the people who started the game, they have no loyalty or fond feelings towards it, its just a job and they could continue to earn thier money say in, day out or try to impose their emotionally invested ideas of how to change the game and to get them a huge payday in terms of bonuses and share options, theres no downside for them personally doing this and in their mind the potential rewards are great

DeviouslyCursed:  You are lying. That screenshot does not represent 60% of battles. Battles like that screenshot are extremely rare. You're trying to use an extreme example and then act like all the slightly off battles are the same. They are not. If you say otherwise, we can set up a test. We'll look at your number of battles played and you can play 10 battles, and you screenshot the lineups. If you are correct, 6 of your screenshots should look similar to what you posted one here. Even with a small sample size, if it's 60% at least a few of them should be like that. You and I both know that won't happen. You are posting extreme matches and dishonestly presenting it as common.

DeviouslyCursed: SimplySimple's logic: SBMM will give each team a 50% chance to win, unless there is a purple player on each side, in which case now each team has a 60% chance to win.

DeviouslyCursed:  So, back in the day, I loved All Chat. I was a master of using it, and I think that's one of the reasons I can't get the same win rate I could back then. I have no issues with anything any one says, because I'm not a p****. Now, having said that, since you can't talk to the enemy team, all that garbage you said is worthless. Actually, it is worse than useless, because you are distracting your own team. How about learn to sftu and play. Everything I ever did was to distract and irritate the enemy team. What you are doing now is to your own team. Even if what you typed wasn't bannable on its own, that fact that you were typing useless crap to your team means I support any and all bans you get from WG. Thank you WG, for removing this moron from my team chat. It is much appreciated.

Draschel: Remove bots from random battle. Allow WG to forcefully, purposely own their material. Allow them to rightfully nerf premiums for game balance. Rather than listen complaints about DONT NERF MY PREM Remove arta entirely. Every arta, is remade into a tank destroyer, with new tech trees, buffed  HP  VR  ammo choices Remove light tanks. Light tanks remade into soft medium tanks, specifically the fast high firepower lighter skin mediums like AMX30, Leopard, BatChat, Bourratt Wheeled vehicles remade into tank destroyers, giving them slower turret and wheel traverse, less effective dispersion. Auto lock removed. They can flip over and time-out. They can be immobilized  RNG lowered to 7.5%   shell placement sigma sample size  tightened when firing, fully aimed.  Lower shell velocity, to add more aiming skill required+1/-1 MM made a thing, no longer +2/-2. Pref tanks already with +1 cap get buffed, to only 2  +1 tier tanks possible in their matches. IE:   E25  will only ever see max 2  tier  8,  KV5 will only ever see max 2 tier 9. Reduce crew injury and ammo rack/turret jam/engine damage/fuel line damage  modular damage, to only possible when under 50% HP. It is bogus and infuriating, when you take a 5% damage hit, and still are 95% HP, and suffer critical damage. Outer module, like vision scope, track, gun module damage remains unchanged Add new armor effectiveness tables, like armored warfare or War Thunder. Hardened steel armor for instance is your normal, average performer = 1.00.  Tires and tracks, predominantly autobody sheet metal and rubber, are 0.25, 0.25 of normal steel armor. Wood can be something like 0.33.  Concrete and bricks,  0.50.  Non plate steel like panzer IV schmulturm and is2-shielded  and WZ132-1 chain link net  can be 0.70. Gun barrel structure steel can be 0.90.  Extra armor casting like suka pershing and super conqueror and E100  skirts  are  add-on armor   1.10, specifically designed to be spaced armor protection.  Remove ridiculous soviet black hole spaced armor sides on basically all their high tiers Remove tank spaced armor x3 HE resistance modifier, see above as to new implementation Remove tank heart attacks and random sliding even on flat rocks. No more soap rocks Map balance please. Balance and bring back old maps. Please implement a more guaranteed map rotation algorithm.  Remove x3 overmatch for armor, by projectile size. Make it new, x5 penetration amount over armor thickness instead.  Please have dev team, armor modelers. balance team, supertest coordinators  PLAY THE ACTUAL  GAME, rather than be alien from it and not understand crucial things    

Draschel:  A huge amount of the population, have always been upset by being randomly derped by howitzer tanks for large amounts of damage, even without penetrationThis isn't just a tier X thing. It is as (was) across the game thing. The game is now better, more skilled because of it.While I will agree, there are other issues more important than HE change, like fairer +1/-1 MM queue, reducing RNG 25% spread, Etc  HE changes were certainly on many (and my) minds as something to be changed and made more predictable, controllable, and importantly, secondary or tertiary..... not substitutingly primary. It is a purposeful support round, for specific function.....not a means of unskilled, projectile vomit spam.   Made to make the chieftain and 279E or 110E3 broken? Or made to make the OI, KV2, FV not broken? It depends what camp you sit in.  

DeviouslyCursed:  I wanted to hate on you and call you a trash complainer, but I actually agree with many of your suggestions, so +1. I would add "Remove the Japanese heavies" they just don't fit in, they look weird. They were neat as a gimmick, but come on, a tank that is 3 times the size of everything else on the battlefield? Just get rid of them too.

TeriyakiTanker:
So you spent a lot of money on a pay to win game and you still suck..... can you explain that?

1LT_Dwayne: Yeah I'll give you +1 on this can't deny it but they still have the worst MM of all time.

Jaguarz:  I would have agreed with you until recently, my in game chat is way lower than PG-12 and got a chat ban and I know I used nothing more profane than idiot and idiotic.

DeviouslyCursed:  If you do that in game, once you can start seeing people's places, there is literally a Player Search box in the top'ish right of the screen. It's grey on my screen. Then after you search someone, you can click their name and you get a box that shows their overall similar to what you see for your own stats. But if da_rock wants to verify, he better hurry up because I'm about to start drinking and gamin, and I'm probably going to mess it up.

DeviouslyCursed: wow, iq test applied and results are in.  Someone failed hard.  He's actually trying to say short term win rate is more impressive than long term win rate.  Just wow, and just so wrong.  Win rate over more battles trumps win rate in less battles every time.  Win the superbowl once, great.  Win the superbowl 3 years in a row - legendary.   That's not what I said, but it doesn't surprise me at all that you didn't understand it. You also cut out the relevant parts of my text which shows that wasn't what I was saying, which was either out of malicious intent or ignorance. 

DeviouslyCursed:

DeviouslyCursed:  Do we have different clients or something? Because I can see everyone else, and there's even a search function in the game to look someone up.

Jaguarz:  Problem for whoever is pushing this stupid update is the Console version makes a pittance in comparison to the PC version. Anything that will effect the bottom dollar of this game will have to be run past the bean counters and they are naturally risk adverse when it comes to losing revenue no matter how emotionally invested the person pushing this mess is. The people at the top of wargaming dont care about this game past the money it makes, those promoted above their station "running it" may have all these big ideas and imaginings of how their "amazing vision" will generate more money and thus get them huge bonuses and share options but that simply means they are emotionally invested and self delusional. Rubicon was the first example, it would have cost the game players and money overall so it didnt happen, idea was shelved and the game carried on printing money. Then crew 2.0 showed up which was essentially Rubicon warmed over, same basic idea, universally reviled, didnt get past the accountants, if it did they would have pushed it regardless of player opinion. Now cew 2.0.1 is here and whoever is running this stupid project is trying to push it through again with virtually no changes and apparently no concept about how to balance things because it literally breaks the game in ways that cant be repaired in the system they are introducing. Literally making World of Tanks 2.0 would be an easier task than trying to shoehorn this mess into the core game and make it balanced and accepted by the playerbase. Now you may say the HE changes were lambasted but they still happened but simply put it was a nominal change, it screwed over very few tanks and they tacked on an artillery change which was popular with most of the players as most people hate arty. Theres nothing they could attach to this mess to shadow it, theres no way they can get the balance values right without making the whole system pointless. This is a game in retention mode, its expansion phase is long gone, it needs to retain the players it has and to keep the money flow coming, the only thing this will do is reduce players, its not popular. Im pretty confident that this will not make it past the accountants and its they who are the ones who dictate what goes on the live servers, not the "developers". That being said Im getting pretty bored of the developers trying to push garbage like this onto the game as opposed to content like maps which in spite of what they claim really isnt difficult to make.

Jaguarz:  Dont you have to have X hours logged on a game from steam before you can review it? Kind of blows out the "reviewers didnt even install" narrative you are peddling.

KRZYBooP: Howdy Boom Jockeys!    For more information on Prime Gaming and claiming your looks click HERE.

Jaguarz: Poor troll attempt, 0/10

Jaguarz:  If one person can create a 500 veiw range clown car and a 70%+ invistank theres little to test and fundamentals are broken, you may want to look up the term irony sometime and think about how whining about imaginary whiners makes you lool.

Jaguarz: Its the same as last iteration just with very minor tweaks which itself was a variant on the Rubicon disaster warmed over. So little has changed it smacks of someones vanity project, as in total emotional investment, I doubt it will get past the bean counters as the exec in charge of this mess will have to convince them this will raise revenue as opposed to make people quit and play something else.

DeviouslyCursed:  

DeviouslyCursed:  Wow, you don't even know how to go to the WoT website and look up the Hall of Fame? Seriously? It's under Ratings > Achievement Ratings. Then just click on the Victories section. It's the the left of the main WTR rating stat. I'm 89 and 78 for tier 8+ now. Just scroll down to that position and you'll see the name. I don't remember my login or even what site I used to post screenshots so I'm not going to bother. Especially when you can look it up yourself. Good lord, fool, I could edit a screenshot and put myself #1 if I wanted to. Looking it up yourself is far more reliable evidence. And before idiot boy SimplySimple claims I'm bragging again, I already said, multiple times, month to month is silly and anyone can get on there with a few good games. But that's the type of mentality he has: a dishonest little prick. 

Elias_K_Grodin: Get "On Track" to the T-100LT between July 20 to August 20th! On Track Missions: T-100 LTMISSIONS BEGIN: Jul. 20, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Aug. 20, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Get more details here! Also learn more about special bundle offers with special missions for the T-100LT here!

Hey_man_Gneis_shot: Get "On Track" to the T-100LT between July 20 to August 20th! On Track Missions: T-100 LTMISSIONS BEGIN: Jul. 20, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Aug. 20, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Get more details here! Also learn more about special bundle offers with special missions for the T-100LT here!

Draschel: you don't you play in hulldown with a try hard tank yourself?

Einzelganger7:
Thank you! 

Einzelganger7:

Draschel: Just like Batman leaves Henri Ducard to perish in a microwave inferno? He didn't kill him, but didn't have to save him either. Why was that? Judge ment call over character, or lack of it.I wasn't mentioning the disease, at all. I recall being the one recommending it shouldn't be mentioned.   

Draschel:  So if a police officer, shoots a blatant criminal 7 times in the feet, hands, forearms - and the subject proceeds to gun down bystander civilians and the officer himself, in an adrenaline fueled rage.....see where I am going with this? See what your post.......doesn't address? Hitting the the target, isn't the same as successfully penetrating the target. 

Draschel:  Logic yes, gold ammo no. There are other pressing issues I pressure him with.+1/-1 MM not 2,  lowering 25% RNG to 5%, reducing radius sigma for shot population, nerfing arta more, nerfing ridiculous premiums. 

DeviouslyCursed:  So there's a 61%er on one team, and a 59%er on the other.  Then the next players gets assigned. Now a 57%er gets placed on the 59%er's team, and a 54%er gets placed on the 61%er's team. Now it's 61% + 54% vs 59% and 57%, then a bunch of lower skilled players. Now who wins? No matter how you have it, one of the "better" players in the match ups is going to lose. Either the 61% loses to the 59%, or the 54% loses to the 57%. One of those two things will happen. That's why your magical trickle down theory is garbage and won't happen. And yes, I know you don't like to discuss perfect match ups, because you hide in the "stuff happens" aspect of your crappy fuzzy reasoning. Stay non-committal enough and you can claim anything happens in the gaps. Treat numbers like their value is subjective or changeable and you get to things like claim 150-200 battles out of 1000 is the same thing as 10 or 0 battles (1% or none).  

DeviouslyCursed:  Look it up yourself, you lazy prick. It is now 96th place now over all, and 87 in tiers 8-10. It adjusts daily. And SimplySimple was the one that brought it up and bragged about it. (plus he's been calling everyone else stupid for about 40 pages now.) So you can take your little whine about him being called on it and stuff it. 

DeviouslyCursed:  And that is a stupid way of looking at it. This is why you under stand nothing. Number are meaningless to you when it suits you. You are a dishonest, immature person. You're also wrong. winning 150-200 is not losing them all. That's a moron's way of looking at it. So it doesn't surprise me that you take that position. As for it not being a challenge to win when you're out matched because "The way more skilled team has to seriouly fumble"... learn to strip the ball, p****. 

DeviouslyCursed:  Agreed, month to month is useless. But so is selecting 500+. Who the hell plays tech tree tanks that much? This means you've taken most players out of the list. Had to get pretty specific to get yourself up there, didn't ya? You're not even top 100 when using the 150 selection.  

Elias_K_Grodin: Attention Platoon! We are looking for your thoughts, sentiment, and feedback for trying out Common Test 1.14! In particular, we are looking at the following areas:Frontline 2021 Czech heavy tank line Rebalancing, Improvements, Topography, and "Safe Haven" map  For more information about Common Test 1.14, check out what's being tested here! "I learned that good judgment comes from experience and that experience grows out of mistakes." - Omar Bradley, United States Army