Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 21.07.2021 01:27:28
SimplyPzB2, on Jul 20 2021 - 22:42, said: DeviouslyCursed,
on Jul 20 2021 - 17:01, said: blah bla blah ...You know, 150+, the
other category actually used for all time stats. And I'd rate those
at about the same.... blah blah blah wow, iq test applied and
results are in. Someone failed hard. He's actually
trying to say short term win rate is more impressive than long term
win rate. Just wow, and just so wrong. Win rate over
more battles trumps win rate in less battles every time. Win
the superbowl once, great. Win the superbowl 3 years in a row
- legendary. DeviouslyCursed: wow, iq test applied and results are in. Someone failed
hard. He's actually trying to say short term win rate is more
impressive than long term win rate. Just wow, and just so
wrong. Win rate over more battles trumps win rate in less
battles every time. Win the superbowl once, great. Win
the superbowl 3 years in a row - legendary. That's not
what I said, but it doesn't surprise me at all that you didn't
understand it. You also cut out the relevant parts of my text which
shows that wasn't what I was saying, which was either out of
malicious intent or ignorance.
DeviouslyCursed, on Jul 20 2021 - 17:01, said: blah bla blah ...You know, 150+, the other category actually used
for all time stats. And I'd rate those at about the same.... blah
blah blahDeviouslyCursed:
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?