Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893824
White_Eagle_, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:29, said: Wargaming, why are you making me buy additional equipment for a
second loadout, if such a thing was possible would not a crew just
use the equipment on hand if they already purchased it for the
tank? If I have 2 load-outs that each use a rammer I need to
purchase 2? Doesn't it make sense the crew would use the same
1 for each potential loadout? You are making people who have
bounty or bond equipment use 2 pieces on each tank if it is an
important piece like a rammer.
I get that you want to make progression longer and make the game more grindy and have people invest time in tanks and playing the game but your business practice is just so off-putting. It's clever how XP became the currency for unlocking the upgrades and you get people to play more use XP boosters but this is a little too far. Your turning this into a Black Desert Online like grindfest
Link on message: #12893824

I get that you want to make progression longer and make the game more grindy and have people invest time in tanks and playing the game but your business practice is just so off-putting. It's clever how XP became the currency for unlocking the upgrades and you get people to play more use XP boosters but this is a little too far. Your turning this into a Black Desert Online like grindfest
DeviouslyCursed: Why is your name White_Eagle_ but you have the avatar of a
fox? Just curious...
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893822
GSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:45, said: Yes, I understood that, I'm saying that on the CT I found I
was able to run the same Bond Equipment (i.e the Rammer
for example) in both loadouts, same with Bounty Equipment. I have
not however tested it on Live (because I can't atm).
Link on message: #12893822

DeviouslyCursed: Oh, if that is the case then my bad. I haven't unlocked
anything yet, so I don't know one way or the other on what is
possible. I just know people have been crying that it was going to
effectively double the cost of outfitting a tank.
Subject: Topography will do more harm then good for new players
Link on message: #12893820
Link on message: #12893820
DeviouslyCursed: If they set up just one situation where you have a heavy that can
sidescrape, and you get absolutely wrecked if you don't do it
properly, that would be better than all their scenarios combined.
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893791
Platedmeat, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:34, said: WarGaming's Genius Russian Free
To Pay Model! - YouTube pretty much explains it.
Link on message: #12893791

DeviouslyCursed: Claus is an idiot, stop spamming his garbage everywhere. Your
thread entirely about his video is enough.
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893789
GSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:32, said: Unless they changed it since CT (and I'm talking late CT3), it
should be possible to run the same equipment on both loadouts. I
haven't checked myself (I'll have to wait for the update on EU
Tomorrow since I don't have the XP Laying around on this account to
invest into Field Mods on anything) but I don't see a reason why
this would have changed on Live.
Link on message: #12893789

DeviouslyCursed: He means equip something in Loadout 2 that is already
equipped in Loadout 1. He is complaining that if he only has 1 Bond
Rammer, he can't equip is in both loadouts.
Subject: HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
Link on message: #12893787
Link on message: #12893787
Draschel: HE is generally more predictable now. Not entirely, but much
more soHE spam was common when in certain tanks, when
against certain tanks, when in certain tier, when against a certain
player. HE from KV2 or E100 dealing 350 to an enemy, that AP
would have dealt 750 has you fortunate, sure. But that damage
isn't ineffective. Thats still probably an unaimed 350
damage shot you sustain that you couldn't avoidI
encounter it lots. More of, encountered** Now its far fewer,
working as intended. None of it is incorrect. Correct.
Now small HE has the ability to be more than formerly being
useless, and actually useful. A T92 light tank can deal 10 damage
to is7, so long as it avoids the track, gun, mantle. Instead
of 0 all the time, 1.12. And in the opposite spectrum, large
caliber HE like from jagpanzer. isn't auto aim and expect at least
400. Now you can be punished and get 0 for not aiming. The big
thing here, is aiming is required. Aim with small bore, deal
damage. Even if a puny 75mm. Don't aim even with a massive 170mm,
and you can get that 0. Learn to aim.
Don't shoot screens, don't shoot spaced armor.
That is not the shells fault, it is user error. I
agree, most HE less than 130mm i'd say was useless, but it
certainly depends the tier in question. And the target in
question. And if its high pen HE
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893783
RamaLamaDingDong1, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:30, said:
No what you said was your opinion. It has no examples or facts just your opinion which classify you as an example of exactly what DK is about. Again the key is you don't even know what you think you know based on anything but your own confirmation bias opinion but cant see that so yes your a forum reject.
Link on message: #12893783

No what you said was your opinion. It has no examples or facts just your opinion which classify you as an example of exactly what DK is about. Again the key is you don't even know what you think you know based on anything but your own confirmation bias opinion but cant see that so yes your a forum reject.
DeviouslyCursed: Nope. True. You want an example? SBMM and the rejects that
think it will stop blowout games. See? True. Thanks for
playing though.
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893765
RamaLamaDingDong1, on Aug 11 2021 - 00:10, said:
Apparently your a victim of DK yourself. Love the wannabe intellectuals that act like they know more about what or why others say an do things always reference Dunning Kruger. But his is proof of one thing he said. You want misinformation listen to forum rejects.
Link on message: #12893765

Apparently your a victim of DK yourself. Love the wannabe intellectuals that act like they know more about what or why others say an do things always reference Dunning Kruger. But his is proof of one thing he said. You want misinformation listen to forum rejects.
DeviouslyCursed: Except everything I said was true. Not my fault you've lumped
yourself in with them.
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893750
Grillo_Parlante, on Aug 11 2021 - 02:46, said: No, he isn't. He's done about two shots of damage
average over the last 7 days in his jagdpanzer iv, which is the
only tank he seems to play heavily, for a wn8 of 777. This is
the kind of guy who just sits passively waiting for his 2 shots of
damage, not impacting the game, and than triggering losses while
externalizing the cause to something like the matchmaker.
There is a certain point where kindness just
becomes inauthenticity, and that's what you're doing by feeding his
belief that his winrate is being caused by something else.
He's getting results directly proportionate to the effort he's
putting in. If he can't be bothered to make even the most
baseline effort to play the game properly, he should go down to
tier iv (which he seems to play well and gets I guess ok wn8 and wr
at) or play a different game.
Link on message: #12893750

DeviouslyCursed: What he said. I wasn't going to go through that much effort,
but I"m glad you did.
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893729
gamagrass, on Aug 11 2021 - 01:15, said: day 4 nothing but lost after lost after lost. Horrible
[edited][edited]players on every [edited]team i am on.
Link on message: #12893729

DeviouslyCursed: You'd think if one played nothing but TDs, eventually you'd
get good at it. I know, I know... it's your teams holding you
back... I mean, it can't possibly be anything you are doing,
right?
Subject: Patch 1.14 is here!
Link on message: #12893674
Cpt_Zapp_Brannigan, on Aug 10 2021 - 17:59, said: Do we have to uncheck accelerate crew training to get XP for field
mods?
HeavyCalibre, on Aug 10 2021 - 18:15, said: Too funny! Yesterday when I logged onto the game, it asked me if I
wanted to participate in a survey. I said yes. The first question
was "would you recommend WoT to a friend?". I said no. Survey ended
right there. That tells me all I need to know about
Wargaming! 1.14 will probably be the last upgrade I'll see,
IF Crew 2.0 is installed, I will be done with this game.
It's really a shame that the Russians are so typically short
sighted and don't understand the dynamics of business. I blame that
on their communism and lack of capitalism background. Don't get me
wrong, they did a great thing to come out with WoT but a business
is measured beyond being a "flash in the pan"...Longevity is the
key to success. I have started many businesses and eat my own dog
food as they say.
Link on message: #12893674

DomoSapien: Indeed, if you have accelerate crew training enabled, your vehicle
will not accrue any elite xp as all of it will go towards your
crew.

DomoSapien: Kind of strange, I'm genuinely curious if it was a gated survey
that would have unlocked more questions or if it was a simple Net
Promoter Score survey that was literally one question long.
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893648
Link on message: #12893648
DeviouslyCursed: +1 for the video, that s*** is crazy.
Subject: International Cat & Dog Day Giveaway!
Link on message: #12893638
Link on message: #12893638
DomoSapien: Such cute doggos and cattos. My Toffee is looking mighty graceful
in that collage.
Thanks to the players who submitted their pet photos! As a reminder, the contest is still ongoing. Get your pet pics in for a chance to win some sweet loot!
Thanks to the players who submitted their pet photos! As a reminder, the contest is still ongoing. Get your pet pics in for a chance to win some sweet loot!
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893616
lnvalid_Target, on Aug 10 2021 - 23:17, said: Then the real failure here then is developers not properly
communicating the "WHY" things must be a certain way. If
players knew the "WHY", there might not be so many complaints.
Link on message: #12893616

DeviouslyCursed: The 134 page thread on SBMM is a clear indicator you are
wrong about that. When people don't understand logic, reason, and
the nature of evidence... they know that they know, and there is no
convincing that person of anything else.
Subject: Bad MM
Link on message: #12893578
Link on message: #12893578
1LT_Dwayne: Some people here imagine that players that are fairly new to the
game can choose from a selection of 100+ tanks and only play the op
ones. What's makes me hate this game is with certain tanks you feel
like the worst player and with some you feel like a tank god. Right
now I'm playing the pershing and the ae phase 1. WG can you please
balance your fcking tanks? Sorry I'm pissed right now.
Subject: Patch 1.14:Unable to exit battle.
Link on message: #12893564
Link on message: #12893564
Jaguarz: run repair on the game center, if that doesnt work uninstall and
reinstall it is your first port of call with troubleshooting
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893542
Link on message: #12893542
DeviouslyCursed: weird error and double post
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893538
Link on message: #12893538
DeviouslyCursed: This phenomenon is due in large part to the Dunning Kruger Effect:
many players think they know more about games/balance/making things
fun than they actually do, they think it would be so easy to "fix"
any problems they see, and they get their panties in a wad when
developers don't listen to them. The reality is, the surest way to
ruin your game is to listen to the average reject on the forums.
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893531
2Fantastic, on Aug 10 2021 - 19:43, said: The reality is that your stats are impactful, but you aren't just
looking to educate, you're looking to dominate. The reason Mojo is
still arguing with you is that first off you hurt his feelings
because you were rude, which does matter. And second that you are
trying to push people to read the stats one way when you don't need
to. You have excellent stats. You also keep on claiming
things like "feelz" don't matter in a video game, but they
completely do. For instance I could engineer a system in which
randomly I would have players face off against machine learning
bots(high end), that were designed to give the opposing players the
perfect amount of competition and excitement. This is one of the
things I would want to work on after getting my degree, and it will
all be based off "feelz".
Link on message: #12893531

DeviouslyCursed: Apparently only a few actually read my long post. I will
repost the pertinent portion here, since I already addressed this
issue
clearly.-----------------------------------------------------As far
as Neato's comments. Well, which response has the correct answer to
2 + 2? A. The answer is 4B. The answer is 4, you
prick. They both do. Adding an insult does not make the answer
any less correct. It is still the right answer. The truth of
Neato's answers does not change. The accuracy of his data does
not change. Yes, I know; those of simple minds get triggered and
can't separate out the facts from the jibes when there's been an
insult. It's part of why they can't arrive at the correct
conclusion anyway; they're easily distracted. But that's really not
our problem. Yes, I also know about the whole "but you can convince
people if you use nice words!" position some try to bring
up. That might work when people are on the fence, or in a
different medium. But on internet forums, I think I may have
seen about 5 people be convinced after an argument since about
the year 2000. This isn't a courtroom, where "truth" is
what you can convince people it is and a person's life is then
affected. Your position about how people perceive things, and
emotional arguments matter there. But we're talking about actual
reality. Reality doesn't care if you believe it, it is still true.
Reality doesn't care if you like it, it is still true. Reality
doesn't care if someone insulted you and hurt your little feelings,
it is still
reality.---------------------------------------------------------
Subject: they did it
Link on message: #12893521
Link on message: #12893521
DeviouslyCursed: I detest FrontLines and wasn't going to play it at all unless there
was a lot of bonds at stake, but even I think including tier 9's
was a bad move.
Subject: Patch 1.14 is here!
Link on message: #12893509
Link on message: #12893509
Einzelganger7: So far, what I am enjoying the most of the patch is the fix to the
soap rocks and surfaces, now the tanks feel much more stable while
driving through them and also they seem to have better speed while
going up on slopes.
Subject: Improved Field Modification: How It Works
Link on message: #12893498
cloudwalking, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:01, said: Let me try and explain what will happen, since you're new
here and barely play the game...and don't play above low
tier...yet. The top clans will all unlock these bonus slots
because they will be among the few who can afford it day 1.
Then they'll put their built Clan Wars crew in the tank for
cw's....along with bond/bounty setups. Lower clans will NEVER
be able to compete. Hell, they can't compete already simply
due to the chieftain mainly. The entire system is creating a
divide that can no longer be crossed. I'm one of the ones in
a clan that will have all this stuff. I've got 400k free xp
and can make xp quite easily. I have multiple sets of
bond/bounty equipment. I'll have 3 crew per tank pretty much
to switch out for whatever scenario I need. Its a runaway
train. Have you even played a clan wars, Gneiss? Do
you play tournies, Gneiss? No, you play tier 5. smfh
Link on message: #12893498

Elias_K_Grodin: I appreciate your candor in pointing out that I am returning to the
game after a few years and trying to catch up. I am happy for your
accomplishments and wish you and your clan mates all of the
best. Nevertheless, I play this game at my own pace and will
not move up to the next tier until I am comfortable with that
gameplay. I play WoT out of enjoyment and look forward upgrading my
vehicles when I am ready for the next challenge. "We are all
members of the same great family ... On social occasions the
formality of strictly military occasions should be relaxed, and a
spirit of friendliness and goodwill should prevail." - John A.
Lejeune, United States Marine Corps
Subject: Improved Field Modification: How It Works
Link on message: #12893498
cloudwalking, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:01, said: Let me try and explain what will happen, since you're new
here and barely play the game...and don't play above low
tier...yet. The top clans will all unlock these bonus slots
because they will be among the few who can afford it day 1.
Then they'll put their built Clan Wars crew in the tank for
cw's....along with bond/bounty setups. Lower clans will NEVER
be able to compete. Hell, they can't compete already simply
due to the chieftain mainly. The entire system is creating a
divide that can no longer be crossed. I'm one of the ones in
a clan that will have all this stuff. I've got 400k free xp
and can make xp quite easily. I have multiple sets of
bond/bounty equipment. I'll have 3 crew per tank pretty much
to switch out for whatever scenario I need. Its a runaway
train. Have you even played a clan wars, Gneiss? Do
you play tournies, Gneiss? No, you play tier 5. smfh
Link on message: #12893498

Hey_man_Gneis_shot: I appreciate your candor in pointing out that I am returning to the
game after a few years and trying to catch up. I am happy for your
accomplishments and wish you and your clan mates all of the
best. Nevertheless, I play this game at my own pace and will
not move up to the next tier until I am comfortable with that
gameplay. I play WoT out of enjoyment and look forward upgrading my
vehicles when I am ready for the next challenge. "We are all
members of the same great family ... On social occasions the
formality of strictly military occasions should be relaxed, and a
spirit of friendliness and goodwill should prevail." - John A.
Lejeune, United States Marine Corps
Subject: Skoda T56 Incoming
Link on message: #12893396
13Disciple, on Aug 10 2021 - 20:26, said: Why I have no idea what you're talking about ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Link on message: #12893396

Jaguarz: So you are saying you have T56 codes and people should spam
you for them?
Subject: Field modification and warpack ....
Link on message: #12893384
Kliphie_Reborn, on Aug 10 2021 - 20:26, said: Not sure what rigging in the early hours on SA has to do with
Warpack
Link on message: #12893384

Jaguarz: He could use it to turn the pubbie Maus sideways.....
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893371
NeatoMan, on Aug 10 2021 - 14:47, said: As others have said, if you are correct, then bad players are far
worse than they really are and good players are far better.
That's not what many of the complainers want to hear. but my
post was more in response to this assertion by Maniac; He's
alleging that RNG actively nerfs good players, rather than it
just being a result of the randomness, which applies equally to
everyone..
Link on message: #12893371

DeviouslyCursed: Just to be clear when I said Maniac was correct, I personally
was not referring to an active mechanic affecting players that can
be manipulated. I was referring to RNG effectively "capping" the
skill that good players can bring to bear in that one aspect of the
game. If one removes that cap, you will see a redistribution all
along the skill spectrum as those with good hand eye coordination
get better and those without get worse. But the current really good
players who also have really good mouse control... they would
become gods. 10 years ago I would have been okay with RNG
removal on shot dispersion. Now, no way. I have no delusions about
my abilities now (or lack there of).
Subject: Noob Field Modification Question
Link on message: #12893369
Link on message: #12893369
churchill50: If you have Elite XP on the tank, it will use that to purchase the
Field Mods.If you don't have Elite XP, or you don't have sufficient
Elite XP to purchase the Field Mod, it will use Free XP.
Subject: [Opiniones] Actualización 1.14
Link on message: #12893367
Link on message: #12893367
Adam_Antium: ¡Saludos, Comandantes! Es de público conocimiento que ha
llegado la Actualización 1.14 y que esta trae una letanía de
cambios: nueva rama, nuevo mapa, nueva mecánica, nuevo modo y mucho
más. Por eso, a continuación, les dejo este video que especifica
las novedades... ...y por otro lado, como siempre, abro
este hilo para comunicar sus impresiones respecto a esta nueva
actualización.A continuación, les tiro un par de ejes por si
precisan arrancar por algún lado (aunque toda opinión es
válida): ¿Qué les parece la nueva rama? ¿Qué piensan de las
modificaciones a las misiones de artillería? ¿Las mejoras a los
tanques premium han sido satisfactorias? ¿Han probado las
modificaciones? ¿Qué les han parecido? ¿Qué balance hacen de este
parche? ¿Positivo, negativo, neutral? ¡Saludos y buenas
batallas!
Subject: Field modification and warpack ....
Link on message: #12893357
Reichmonk, on Aug 10 2021 - 20:20, said: Can we see a link to this youtube video? That would prove your
statement beyond any doubt, so why just not do it right away
Link on message: #12893357

Jaguarz: look up Darth Sensei of rigging, its not a cheat program
Subject: Pz.Kpfw. VII Worth unlocking?
Link on message: #12893347
Panzergraf, on Aug 10 2021 - 19:19, said:
As a rental it was godlike as t10 MM was full of other rentals who had no idea where to shoot it and kept spamming regular AP into its lower plate, got multiple 10k+ blocked games in it by just sitting infront of rental 5A's.
It's actually not very good at all, but better than the VKB.
IMO one of the weakest tier 10 heavies. E100 with the small gun does pretty much everything the Pz7 does, but better.
Link on message: #12893347

As a rental it was godlike as t10 MM was full of other rentals who had no idea where to shoot it and kept spamming regular AP into its lower plate, got multiple 10k+ blocked games in it by just sitting infront of rental 5A's.
It's actually not very good at all, but better than the VKB.
IMO one of the weakest tier 10 heavies. E100 with the small gun does pretty much everything the Pz7 does, but better.
Jaguarz: Its not great but its not as bad as people think, its just
not easy and not versatile, the e100 got buffed recently,
unnecessarily imo so the pz7 is certainly a candidate for
improvement.
Subject: Update 1.14 - Several Vehicles Now Have 0 Combat Eexperience
Link on message: #12893267
Link on message: #12893267
churchill50: If you don't have any XP accumulated after playing a battle,
it's because you have Accelerate Crew Training selected.Unselect
the Accelerate Crew Training box above your crew and you'll start
accumulating XP again. Accelerate Crew Training takes the XP
you would normally accumulate and gives it to the lowest skilled
crew member in your crew.
Subject: 7 Reasons Why XVM is BETTER Than Vanilla (and no it isn't stats).
Link on message: #12893258
Link on message: #12893258
churchill50: Some of those are good points. Some though...2. The double row tank
carousel is in the vanilla game now. With no mods installed I have
the carousel and filter options you show in your "With XVM"
screenshot, minus a couple of the stats shown in the carousel.4. As
mentioned above, with no mods I have all of the sort options shown
in your "With XVM" screenshot.6. The proxy spotting circle is in
the vanilla game now.7. The hit log in that location is in the
vanilla game now. 1, 3, and 5 would be nice additions though.
Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893250
IcyFirefly, on Aug 10 2021 - 12:36, said: weird, so its just on my end cuase my receipt looks just as yours
did but i am 110% certain it deduced free exp instead also, howd
you insert that image?
Link on message: #12893250

CabMech:
It might not just be on your end, I just can't replicate it at the moment. I asked CS to keep an eye out for more tickets with the same problem to see if there's a pattern.
Imgur is the best bet for image posting here, easy to upload and then you can just insert the file location URL into the Image box (see highlighted):

It might not just be on your end, I just can't replicate it at the moment. I asked CS to keep an eye out for more tickets with the same problem to see if there's a pattern.
Imgur is the best bet for image posting here, easy to upload and then you can just insert the file location URL into the Image box (see highlighted):

Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893238
IcyFirefly, on Aug 10 2021 - 12:06, said: it is the star which is just the outline. also, i was cheated and i
want it back, the exact quantity is not the issue. I also now cant
upgrade all the other vehicles that i spent time saving up combat
exp on for fear it will just lie and eat all my free exp, so my
tanks will be multiple percent worse due to this issue
Link on message: #12893238

CabMech: Hey IcyFirefly,
From my testing (with the Rudy just to be sure) I can't even get the option to spend Free XP if I have combat exp on it, and upgrading definitely uses the combat XP (my free XP total didn't change).

I'm not sure how this action looks in the invoice logs yet but it's definitely worth submitting a customer support ticket so they can take a look and see if there's a bug happening.
From my testing (with the Rudy just to be sure) I can't even get the option to spend Free XP if I have combat exp on it, and upgrading definitely uses the combat XP (my free XP total didn't change).

I'm not sure how this action looks in the invoice logs yet but it's definitely worth submitting a customer support ticket so they can take a look and see if there's a bug happening.
Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893237
Kritas, on Aug 10 2021 - 10:12, said: For those who don't know and are considering playing WoWs,
WoT and WoWs share free XP across the games. Mind that you don't
spend your free XP from WoT on some drunken sailor!
Link on message: #12893237

churchill50: Incorrect. WoT and World of Warplanes share free xp. WoT and
WoWS do not. It was originally planned that they would, but WG
decided against it at least partially due to how much more inflated
the WoWS economy is.
Subject: We Must Move On!
Link on message: #12893232
Link on message: #12893232
_BobaFett: I disagree on the "pay to win" for the most part. It has been my
experience as a free-to-play that it's still perfectly viable to
play the game without paying. It's simply harder.
There are some exceptions, obviously.
There are some exceptions, obviously.
Subject: Pz.Kpfw. VII Worth unlocking?
Link on message: #12893225
Cupujoe, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:28, said: Turn the oven off, you're truly baked.
Link on message: #12893225

_BobaFett: It's burned, on fire, and charred to the core.
Subject: WHY is Auto Return Crew NOT A THING YET!?!?!
Link on message: #12893218
heavymetal1967, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:37, said: Sometimes it's all about the semantics. Button?
He said AUTO return.
Link on message: #12893218


CabMech:
You're right, somebody raise Ernie Ford we need to rerecord:
♫You move six crew over, and what do you get? Two clicks older and covered in sweat ♫
You're right, somebody raise Ernie Ford we need to rerecord:
♫You move six crew over, and what do you get? Two clicks older and covered in sweat ♫
Реклама | Adv