Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
DeviouslyCursed
Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
arrow
11.08.2021 06:09:58
 
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893824

View PostWhite_Eagle_, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:29, said: Wargaming, why are you making me buy additional equipment for a second loadout, if such a thing was possible would not a crew just use the equipment on hand if they already purchased it for the tank?  If I have 2 load-outs that each use a rammer I need to purchase 2?  Doesn't it make sense the crew would use the same 1 for each potential loadout?  You are making people who have bounty or bond equipment use 2 pieces on each tank if it is an important piece like a rammer.  

I get that you want to make progression longer and make the game more grindy and have people invest time in tanks and playing the game but your business practice is just so off-putting.  It's clever how XP became the currency for unlocking the upgrades and you get people to play more use XP boosters but this is a little too far.  Your turning this into a Black Desert Online like grindfest

DeviouslyCursed:  Why is your name White_Eagle_ but you have the avatar of a fox?  Just curious...


DeviouslyCursed
Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
arrow
11.08.2021 06:08:38
 
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893822

View PostGSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:45, said:   Yes, I understood that, I'm saying that on the CT I found I was able to run the same Bond Equipment (i.e the Rammer for example) in both loadouts, same with Bounty Equipment. I have not however tested it on Live (because I can't atm). 

DeviouslyCursed:  Oh, if that is the case then my bad. I haven't unlocked anything yet, so I don't know one way or the other on what is possible. I just know people have been crying that it was going to effectively double the cost of outfitting a tank.


DeviouslyCursed
Topography will do more harm then good for new players
arrow
11.08.2021 06:05:39
 
Subject: Topography will do more harm then good for new players
Link on message: #12893820

DeviouslyCursed: If they set up just one situation where you have a heavy that can sidescrape, and you get absolutely wrecked if you don't do it properly, that would be better than all their scenarios combined.


DeviouslyCursed
Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
arrow
11.08.2021 05:41:33
 
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893791

View PostPlatedmeat, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:34, said:   WarGaming's Genius Russian Free To Pay Model! - YouTube pretty much explains it.

DeviouslyCursed:  Claus is an idiot, stop spamming his garbage everywhere. Your thread entirely about his video is enough.


DeviouslyCursed
Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
arrow
11.08.2021 05:40:25
 
Subject: Field mods: Why cant I share equipment between loadouts (Bond!)
Link on message: #12893789

View PostGSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:32, said: Unless they changed it since CT (and I'm talking late CT3), it should be possible to run the same equipment on both loadouts. I haven't checked myself (I'll have to wait for the update on EU Tomorrow since I don't have the XP Laying around on this account to invest into Field Mods on anything) but I don't see a reason why this would have changed on Live.

DeviouslyCursed:  He means equip something in Loadout 2 that is already equipped in Loadout 1. He is complaining that if he only has 1 Bond Rammer, he can't equip is in both loadouts.


Draschel
HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
arrow
11.08.2021 05:38:22
 
Subject: HE changes have RUINED Derp Guns
Link on message: #12893787

Draschel: HE is generally more predictable now. Not entirely, but much more soHE spam was common when in certain tanks, when against certain tanks, when in certain tier, when against a certain player. HE from KV2 or E100 dealing 350 to an enemy, that AP would have dealt 750 has you fortunate, sure. But that damage isn't ineffective. Thats still probably an unaimed 350 damage shot you sustain that you couldn't avoidI encounter it lots. More of, encountered**  Now its far fewer, working as intended. None of it is incorrect. Correct. Now small HE has the ability to be more than formerly being useless, and actually useful. A T92 light tank can deal 10 damage to is7, so long as it avoids the track, gun, mantle. Instead of 0 all the time, 1.12. And in the opposite spectrum, large caliber HE like from jagpanzer. isn't auto aim and expect at least 400. Now you can be punished and get 0 for not aiming. The big thing here, is aiming is required. Aim with small bore, deal damage. Even if a puny 75mm. Don't aim even with a massive 170mm, and you can get that 0.  Learn to aim. Don't shoot screens, don't shoot spaced armor. That is not the shells fault, it is user error.  I agree, most HE less than 130mm i'd say was useless, but it certainly depends the tier in question. And the target in question.  And if its high pen HE


DeviouslyCursed
on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
arrow
11.08.2021 05:33:53
 
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893783

View PostRamaLamaDingDong1, on Aug 11 2021 - 03:30, said:
No what you said was your opinion. It has no examples or facts just your opinion which classify you as an example of exactly what DK is about. Again the key is you don't even know what you think you know based on anything but your own confirmation bias opinion but cant see that so yes your a forum reject.

DeviouslyCursed:  Nope. True. You want an example? SBMM and the rejects that think it will stop blowout games. See? True. Thanks for playing though.


DeviouslyCursed
on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
arrow
11.08.2021 05:13:19
 
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893765

View PostRamaLamaDingDong1, on Aug 11 2021 - 00:10, said:
Apparently your a victim of DK yourself. Love the wannabe intellectuals that act like they know more about what or why others say an do things always reference Dunning Kruger. But his is proof of one thing he said. You want misinformation listen to forum rejects.

DeviouslyCursed:  Except everything I said was true. Not my fault you've lumped yourself in with them.


DeviouslyCursed
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
arrow
11.08.2021 04:58:17
 
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893750

View PostGrillo_Parlante, on Aug 11 2021 - 02:46, said:   No, he isn't.  He's done about two shots of damage average over the last 7 days in his jagdpanzer iv, which is the only tank he seems to play heavily, for a wn8 of 777.  This is the kind of guy who just sits passively waiting for his 2 shots of damage, not impacting the game, and than triggering losses while externalizing the cause to something like the matchmaker.       There is a certain point where kindness just becomes inauthenticity, and that's what you're doing by feeding his belief that his winrate is being caused by something else.  He's getting results directly proportionate to the effort he's putting in.  If he can't be bothered to make even the most baseline effort to play the game properly, he should go down to tier iv (which he seems to play well and gets I guess ok wn8 and wr at) or play a different game.     

DeviouslyCursed:  What he said. I wasn't going to go through that much effort, but I"m glad you did.


DeviouslyCursed
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
arrow
11.08.2021 04:24:20
 
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893729

View Postgamagrass, on Aug 11 2021 - 01:15, said: day 4 nothing but lost after lost after lost.  Horrible [edited][edited]players on every [edited]team i am on.

DeviouslyCursed:  You'd think if one played nothing but TDs, eventually you'd get good at it. I know, I know...  it's your teams holding you back...  I mean, it can't possibly be anything you are doing, right?


DomoSapien
Patch 1.14 is here!
arrow
11.08.2021 03:27:30
 
Subject: Patch 1.14 is here!
Link on message: #12893674

View PostCpt_Zapp_Brannigan, on Aug 10 2021 - 17:59, said: Do we have to uncheck accelerate crew training to get XP for field mods?    

DomoSapien: Indeed, if you have accelerate crew training enabled, your vehicle will not accrue any elite xp as all of it will go towards your crew.

View PostHeavyCalibre, on Aug 10 2021 - 18:15, said: Too funny! Yesterday when I logged onto the game, it asked me if I wanted to participate in a survey. I said yes. The first question was "would you recommend WoT to a friend?". I said no. Survey ended right there.   That tells me all I need to know about Wargaming!   1.14 will probably be the last upgrade I'll see, IF Crew 2.0 is installed, I will be done with this game.   It's really a shame that the Russians are so typically short sighted and don't understand the dynamics of business. I blame that on their communism and lack of capitalism background. Don't get me wrong, they did a great thing to come out with WoT but a business is measured beyond being a "flash in the pan"...Longevity is the key to success. I have started many businesses and eat my own dog food as they say.

DomoSapien: Kind of strange, I'm genuinely curious if it was a gated survey that would have unlocked more questions or if it was a simple Net Promoter Score survey that was literally one question long.


DeviouslyCursed
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
arrow
11.08.2021 03:02:17
 
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893648

DeviouslyCursed: +1 for the video, that s*** is crazy.


DomoSapien
International Cat & Dog Day Giveaway!
arrow
11.08.2021 02:53:17
 
Subject: International Cat & Dog Day Giveaway!
Link on message: #12893638

DomoSapien: Such cute doggos and cattos. My Toffee is looking mighty graceful in that collage.

Thanks to the players who submitted their pet photos! As a reminder, the contest is still ongoing. Get your pet pics in for a chance to win some sweet loot!


DeviouslyCursed
on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
arrow
11.08.2021 02:35:23
 
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893616

View Postlnvalid_Target, on Aug 10 2021 - 23:17, said:   Then the real failure here then is developers not properly communicating the "WHY" things must be a certain way.   If players knew the "WHY", there might not be so many complaints.

DeviouslyCursed:  The 134 page thread on SBMM is a clear indicator you are wrong about that. When people don't understand logic, reason, and the nature of evidence... they know that they know, and there is no convincing that person of anything else.


1LT_Dwayne
Bad MM
arrow
11.08.2021 01:52:17
 
Subject: Bad MM
Link on message: #12893578

1LT_Dwayne: Some people here imagine that players that are fairly new to the game can choose from a selection of 100+ tanks and only play the op ones. What's makes me hate this game is with certain tanks you feel like the worst player and with some you feel like a tank god. Right now I'm playing the pershing and the ae phase 1. WG can you please balance your fcking tanks? Sorry I'm pissed right now.


Jaguarz
Patch 1.14:Unable to exit battle.
arrow
11.08.2021 01:31:04
 
Subject: Patch 1.14:Unable to exit battle.
Link on message: #12893564

Jaguarz: run repair on the game center, if that doesnt work uninstall and reinstall it is your first port of call with troubleshooting


DeviouslyCursed
on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
arrow
11.08.2021 01:08:44
 
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893542

DeviouslyCursed: weird error and double post 


DeviouslyCursed
on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
arrow
11.08.2021 01:05:27
 
Subject: on-line gaming dis-satisfaction aint just here...
Link on message: #12893538

DeviouslyCursed: This phenomenon is due in large part to the Dunning Kruger Effect: many players think they know more about games/balance/making things fun than they actually do, they think it would be so easy to "fix" any problems they see, and they get their panties in a wad when developers don't listen to them. The reality is, the surest way to ruin your game is to listen to the average reject on the forums.


DeviouslyCursed
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
arrow
11.08.2021 00:52:20
 
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893531

View Post2Fantastic, on Aug 10 2021 - 19:43, said: The reality is that your stats are impactful, but you aren't just looking to educate, you're looking to dominate. The reason Mojo is still arguing with you is that first off you hurt his feelings because you were rude, which does matter. And second that you are trying to push people to read the stats one way when you don't need to. You have excellent stats.   You also keep on claiming things like "feelz" don't matter in a video game, but they completely do. For instance I could engineer a system in which randomly I would have players face off against machine learning bots(high end), that were designed to give the opposing players the perfect amount of competition and excitement. This is one of the things I would want to work on after getting my degree, and it will all be based off "feelz".

DeviouslyCursed:  Apparently only a few actually read my long post. I will repost the pertinent portion here, since I already addressed this issue clearly.-----------------------------------------------------As far as Neato's comments. Well, which response has the correct answer to 2 + 2? A. The answer is 4B. The answer is 4, you prick. They both do. Adding an insult does not make the answer any less correct. It is still the right answer. The truth of Neato's answers does not change. The accuracy of his data does not change. Yes, I know; those of simple minds get triggered and can't separate out the facts from the jibes when there's been an insult. It's part of why they can't arrive at the correct conclusion anyway; they're easily distracted. But that's really not our problem. Yes, I also know about the whole "but you can convince people if you use nice words!" position some try to bring up. That might work when people are on the fence, or in a different medium. But on internet forums, I think I may have seen about 5 people be convinced after an argument since about the year 2000.  This isn't a courtroom, where "truth" is what you can convince people it is and a person's life is then affected. Your position about how people perceive things, and emotional arguments matter there. But we're talking about actual reality. Reality doesn't care if you believe it, it is still true. Reality doesn't care if you like it, it is still true. Reality doesn't care if someone insulted you and hurt your little feelings, it is still reality.---------------------------------------------------------


DeviouslyCursed
they did it
arrow
11.08.2021 00:41:57
 
Subject: they did it
Link on message: #12893521

DeviouslyCursed: I detest FrontLines and wasn't going to play it at all unless there was a lot of bonds at stake, but even I think including tier 9's was a bad move.


Einzelganger7
Patch 1.14 is here!
arrow
11.08.2021 00:29:31
 
Subject: Patch 1.14 is here!
Link on message: #12893509

Einzelganger7: So far, what I am enjoying the most of the patch is the fix to the soap rocks and surfaces, now the tanks feel much more stable while driving through them and also they seem to have better speed while going up on slopes.


Elias_K_Grodin
Improved Field Modification: How It Works
arrow
11.08.2021 00:20:26
 
Subject: Improved Field Modification: How It Works
Link on message: #12893498

View Postcloudwalking, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:01, said:   Let me try and explain what will happen, since you're new here and barely play the game...and don't play above low tier...yet.   The top clans will all unlock these bonus slots because they will be among the few who can afford it day 1.  Then they'll put their built Clan Wars crew in the tank for cw's....along with bond/bounty setups.  Lower clans will NEVER be able to compete.  Hell, they can't compete already simply due to the chieftain mainly.   The entire system is creating a divide that can no longer be crossed.  I'm one of the ones in a clan that will have all this stuff.  I've got 400k free xp and can make xp quite easily.  I have multiple sets of bond/bounty equipment.  I'll have 3 crew per tank pretty much to switch out for whatever scenario I need.  Its a runaway train.   Have you even played a clan wars, Gneiss?  Do you play tournies, Gneiss?  No, you play tier 5.  smfh

Elias_K_Grodin: I appreciate your candor in pointing out that I am returning to the game after a few years and trying to catch up. I am happy for your accomplishments and wish you and your clan mates all of the best. Nevertheless, I play this game at my own pace and will not move up to the next tier until I am comfortable with that gameplay. I play WoT out of enjoyment and look forward upgrading my vehicles when I am ready for the next challenge. "We are all members of the same great family ... On social occasions the formality of strictly military occasions should be relaxed, and a spirit of friendliness and goodwill should prevail." - John A. Lejeune, United States Marine Corps


Hey_man_Gneis_shot
Improved Field Modification: How It Works
arrow
11.08.2021 00:20:26
 
Subject: Improved Field Modification: How It Works
Link on message: #12893498

View Postcloudwalking, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:01, said:   Let me try and explain what will happen, since you're new here and barely play the game...and don't play above low tier...yet.   The top clans will all unlock these bonus slots because they will be among the few who can afford it day 1.  Then they'll put their built Clan Wars crew in the tank for cw's....along with bond/bounty setups.  Lower clans will NEVER be able to compete.  Hell, they can't compete already simply due to the chieftain mainly.   The entire system is creating a divide that can no longer be crossed.  I'm one of the ones in a clan that will have all this stuff.  I've got 400k free xp and can make xp quite easily.  I have multiple sets of bond/bounty equipment.  I'll have 3 crew per tank pretty much to switch out for whatever scenario I need.  Its a runaway train.   Have you even played a clan wars, Gneiss?  Do you play tournies, Gneiss?  No, you play tier 5.  smfh

Hey_man_Gneis_shot: I appreciate your candor in pointing out that I am returning to the game after a few years and trying to catch up. I am happy for your accomplishments and wish you and your clan mates all of the best. Nevertheless, I play this game at my own pace and will not move up to the next tier until I am comfortable with that gameplay. I play WoT out of enjoyment and look forward upgrading my vehicles when I am ready for the next challenge. "We are all members of the same great family ... On social occasions the formality of strictly military occasions should be relaxed, and a spirit of friendliness and goodwill should prevail." - John A. Lejeune, United States Marine Corps


DomoSapien
Patch 1.14 is here!
arrow
10.08.2021 23:17:45
 
Subject: Patch 1.14 is here!
Link on message: #12893425

DomoSapien: Bump for visibility.


Jaguarz
Skoda T56 Incoming
arrow
10.08.2021 22:52:58
 
Subject: Skoda T56 Incoming
Link on message: #12893396

View Post13Disciple, on Aug 10 2021 - 20:26, said:   Why I have no idea what you're talking about ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Jaguarz:  So you are saying you have T56 codes and people should spam you for them?


Jaguarz
Field modification and warpack ....
arrow
10.08.2021 22:43:14
 
Subject: Field modification and warpack ....
Link on message: #12893384

View PostKliphie_Reborn, on Aug 10 2021 - 20:26, said: Not sure what rigging in the early hours on SA has to do with Warpack

Jaguarz:  He could use it to turn the pubbie Maus sideways.....


DeviouslyCursed
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
arrow
10.08.2021 22:36:13
 
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12893371

View PostNeatoMan, on Aug 10 2021 - 14:47, said: As others have said, if you are correct, then bad players are far worse than they really are and good players are far better.  That's not what many of the complainers want to hear.   but my post was more in response to this assertion by Maniac;  He's alleging that RNG actively nerfs good players, rather than it just being a result of the randomness, which applies equally to everyone..

DeviouslyCursed:  Just to be clear when I said Maniac was correct, I personally was not referring to an active mechanic affecting players that can be manipulated. I was referring to RNG effectively "capping" the skill that good players can bring to bear in that one aspect of the game. If one removes that cap, you will see a redistribution all along the skill spectrum as those with good hand eye coordination get better and those without get worse. But the current really good players who also have really good mouse control... they would become gods. 10 years ago I would have been okay with RNG removal on shot dispersion. Now, no way. I have no delusions about my abilities now (or lack there of).


churchill50
Noob Field Modification Question
arrow
10.08.2021 22:31:14
 
Subject: Noob Field Modification Question
Link on message: #12893369

churchill50: If you have Elite XP on the tank, it will use that to purchase the Field Mods.If you don't have Elite XP, or you don't have sufficient Elite XP to purchase the Field Mod, it will use Free XP.


Adam_Antium
[Opiniones] Actualización 1.14
arrow
10.08.2021 22:28:45
 
Subject: [Opiniones] Actualización 1.14
Link on message: #12893367

Adam_Antium: ¡Saludos, Comandantes! Es de público conocimiento que ha llegado la Actualización 1.14 y que esta trae una letanía de cambios: nueva rama, nuevo mapa, nueva mecánica, nuevo modo y mucho más. Por eso, a continuación, les dejo este video que especifica las novedades...  ...y por otro lado, como siempre, abro este hilo para comunicar sus impresiones respecto a esta nueva actualización.A continuación, les tiro un par de ejes por si precisan arrancar por algún lado (aunque toda opinión es válida): ¿Qué les parece la nueva rama? ¿Qué piensan de las modificaciones a las misiones de artillería? ¿Las mejoras a los tanques premium han sido satisfactorias? ¿Han probado las modificaciones? ¿Qué les han parecido? ¿Qué balance hacen de este parche? ¿Positivo, negativo, neutral? ¡Saludos y buenas batallas!


Jaguarz
Field modification and warpack ....
arrow
10.08.2021 22:23:07
 
Subject: Field modification and warpack ....
Link on message: #12893357

View PostReichmonk, on Aug 10 2021 - 20:20, said: Can we see a link to this youtube video? That would prove your statement beyond any doubt, so why just not do it right away

Jaguarz:  look up Darth Sensei of rigging, its not a cheat program


Jaguarz
Pz.Kpfw. VII Worth unlocking?
arrow
10.08.2021 22:13:39
 
Subject: Pz.Kpfw. VII Worth unlocking?
Link on message: #12893347

View PostPanzergraf, on Aug 10 2021 - 19:19, said:
As a rental it was godlike as t10 MM was full of other rentals who had no idea where to shoot it and kept spamming regular AP into its lower plate, got multiple 10k+ blocked games in it by just sitting infront of rental 5A's.
It's actually not very good at all, but better than the VKB.
IMO one of the weakest tier 10 heavies. E100 with the small gun does pretty much everything the Pz7 does, but better.

Jaguarz:  Its not great but its not as bad as people think, its just not easy and not versatile, the e100 got buffed recently, unnecessarily imo so the pz7 is certainly a candidate for improvement.


churchill50
Update 1.14 - Several Vehicles Now Have 0 Combat Eexperience
arrow
10.08.2021 20:57:33
 
Subject: Update 1.14 - Several Vehicles Now Have 0 Combat Eexperience
Link on message: #12893267

churchill50: If you don't have any XP accumulated after playing a battle, it's because you have Accelerate Crew Training selected.Unselect the Accelerate Crew Training box above your crew and you'll start accumulating XP again. Accelerate Crew Training takes the XP you would normally accumulate and gives it to the lowest skilled crew member in your crew.


churchill50
7 Reasons Why XVM is BETTER Than Vanilla (and no it isn't stats).
arrow
10.08.2021 20:49:38
 
Subject: 7 Reasons Why XVM is BETTER Than Vanilla (and no it isn't stats).
Link on message: #12893258

churchill50: Some of those are good points. Some though...2. The double row tank carousel is in the vanilla game now. With no mods installed I have the carousel and filter options you show in your "With XVM" screenshot, minus a couple of the stats shown in the carousel.4. As mentioned above, with no mods I have all of the sort options shown in your "With XVM" screenshot.6. The proxy spotting circle is in the vanilla game now.7. The hit log in that location is in the vanilla game now. 1, 3, and 5 would be nice additions though.


CabMech
wth
arrow
10.08.2021 20:42:15
 
Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893250

View PostIcyFirefly, on Aug 10 2021 - 12:36, said: weird, so its just on my end cuase my receipt looks just as yours did but i am 110% certain it deduced free exp instead also, howd you insert that image?

CabMech:
It might not just be on your end, I just can't replicate it at the moment.  I asked CS to keep an eye out for more tickets with the same problem to see if there's a pattern.


Imgur is the best bet for image posting here, easy to upload and then you can just insert the file location URL into the Image box (see highlighted):



_BobaFett
wth
arrow
10.08.2021 20:37:15
 
Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893247

_BobaFett: Ouch, that sucks. Sorry.


CabMech
wth
arrow
10.08.2021 20:33:14
 
Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893238

View PostIcyFirefly, on Aug 10 2021 - 12:06, said: it is the star which is just the outline. also, i was cheated and i want it back, the exact quantity is not the issue. I also now cant upgrade all the other vehicles that i spent time saving up combat exp on for fear it will just lie and eat all my free exp, so my tanks will be multiple percent worse due to this issue

CabMech: Hey IcyFirefly,

From my testing (with the Rudy just to be sure) I can't even get the option to spend Free XP if I have combat exp on it, and upgrading definitely uses the combat XP (my free XP total didn't change). 



I'm not sure how this action looks in the invoice logs yet but it's definitely worth submitting a customer support ticket so they can take a look and see if there's a bug happening.


churchill50
wth
arrow
10.08.2021 20:32:15
 
Subject: wth
Link on message: #12893237

View PostKritas, on Aug 10 2021 - 10:12, said: For those who don't know and are considering playing WoWs,  WoT and WoWs share free XP across the games. Mind that you don't spend your free XP from WoT on some drunken sailor!

churchill50:  Incorrect. WoT and World of Warplanes share free xp. WoT and WoWS do not. It was originally planned that they would, but WG decided against it at least partially due to how much more inflated the WoWS economy is.


_BobaFett
We Must Move On!
arrow
10.08.2021 20:27:38
 
Subject: We Must Move On!
Link on message: #12893232

_BobaFett: I disagree on the "pay to win" for the most part. It has been my experience as a free-to-play that it's still perfectly viable to play the game without paying. It's simply harder.

There are some exceptions, obviously.


_BobaFett
Pz.Kpfw. VII Worth unlocking?
arrow
10.08.2021 20:22:40
 
Subject: Pz.Kpfw. VII Worth unlocking?
Link on message: #12893225

View PostCupujoe, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:28, said: Turn the oven off,  you're truly baked.

_BobaFett:  It's burned, on fire, and charred to the core.


CabMech
WHY is Auto Return Crew NOT A THING YET!?!?!
arrow
10.08.2021 20:14:51
 
Subject: WHY is Auto Return Crew NOT A THING YET!?!?!
Link on message: #12893218

View Postheavymetal1967, on Aug 10 2021 - 11:37, said:   Sometimes it's all about the semantics.    Button? :B   He said AUTO return.   
 

CabMech:

You're right, somebody raise Ernie Ford we need to rerecord:

♫You move six crew over, and what do you get?  Two clicks older and covered in sweat ♫



Реклама | Adv