Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910709
Link on message: #12910709
Draschel: so even when someone visibly better speaks up, you just ignore it.
Make new excuses. Talk more nonsense. It is not because you
choose to, willingly. It is because you lack skills. Ability.
Understanding. Comprehension.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910708
choSenfroZen_1, on Sep 05 2021 - 04:30, said: Excuses. I was asking questions. If you think any of the 5
WOT classes take no skill. Prove it. A bunch of privileged players
and their opinions proves nothing.
Kefic, on Sep 05 2021 - 01:09, said: It amuses me he talks about credibility...while being absolutely horrible at the game and yet posts opinions as if they are facts. Ignore that arty apologist.
Link on message: #12910708

Draschel: The following line, is from someone considerably more capable
than you. This just proves my point.Well, to be honest, just ignore
me for a second. And here we go, DISCUSS!
Kefic, on Sep 05 2021 - 01:09, said: It amuses me he talks about credibility...while being absolutely horrible at the game and yet posts opinions as if they are facts. Ignore that arty apologist.
Draschel:
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910701
Link on message: #12910701
Draschel: You are making excuses. Far better players than you, are openly
available and advocating the same thing. You are making excuses.
You cannot use credibility, as you yourself play very poorly to
begin with.I just told you. Excuses. And here we go, the ongoing
plethora of excusesAnd I proved it. Patch 0.6.2.1 onwards until Pat
0.6.2.7 was without artillery
Subject: Grille 15 when will it get some love?
Link on message: #12910686
Link on message: #12910686
Draschel: I think 60 degrees are enough. When I play things like Challenger,
416, SU130PM....I don't really ever realize that I don't have
enough turret traverse.But grille current reach to sides isn't
enough. Needs more than 50
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910685
ArtyLove, on Sep 05 2021 - 02:37, said: Maybe you should play WG's as you choose and others will do the
same. Is that too hard of a concept for you to grasp? If so, as
mentioned above, Blitz is arty free, just for players like you.
ProfessionalFinn, on Sep 05 2021 - 02:21, said: ...... become a heavy sniper with long-range howitzers"
Link on message: #12910685

Draschel: I do play how I want to play, what I want to play.But guess
what professor, WG doesn't listen to me, you, him or her. And guess
what, Arty gets nerfed. It gets nerfed alot. And I am sure its
getting nerfed again. When? We will see.Think of all the times arty
has been nerfed. In fact prior to 1.12, it wasn't even 1
year. At those exact points, did (you) think arty would be due
for even more nerfs, in the future? Guess what.Just saying, as I
mentioned above, stop crying about arty nerfs? There are other
classes you can play. That don't need a game change.

Draschel: Ign is your relevancy check? Are you trying to be a
comedian?Irrelevant. Tanks can equip howitzers. Means nothing.
0.6.2.1 had people running around with A32, M4E4, Mutant 6, and the
limited tech trees at the time. 0.6.2.7 introduced
arta.
Subject: T_K_O is looking for active, friendly players!
Link on message: #12910655
Sthrive, on Aug 17 2021 - 02:20, said: We run two clans and can accommodate a wide range of players
stats!
Link on message: #12910655

Draschel: You are the most toxic of all. I had one conversation with
you, and it was horrible. Wide range of stats, lol.
Look at your own stats. Cybers good stuff, understanding guy,
but man oh man, I wouldn't wish you on anyone.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910638
Clutch_Shot_007, on Sep 05 2021 - 01:47, said: The people who simply can't stand arty in any way, shape, or form
should maybe give Blitz a try. There's no arty at all in that
game. Teams are also much smaller, so avalanching is barely
an issue. So, in one stroke it solves two of the
loudest complaints in WoT. The only real downside I've
noticed seems to be lower quality graphics.
Link on message: #12910638

Draschel: The people who simply can't stand WGs continuous arty
nerfing, in any way or form, should maybe give other classes a try.
Other classes tend not to receive as much negative attention and
nerfing in this respect. Teams are also more cohesive this way, as
formerly outlier, disconnected arty player is replaced by
more interactive team member. So, in one stroke it solves two
of the loudest complaints and absurdities in WoT. No
downsides.
Subject: Arty
Link on message: #12910618
Link on message: #12910618
Draschel: I agree. They should kill the class, instead of nerfing it
continually. Annual arty nerf, the more I think of
it But I do have to say, for people not to lose their
work, crews, assets -- just turn them into new tank destroyers.
Problem solved. Buff their HP, view range, dispersion stats,
accuracy. Change their damage to match tank class values. Heck, WG
just gave them normal high pen ammunition that doesn't need
re-balancing that they can use as premium.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910610
Link on message: #12910610
Draschel: Artillery came into the game, I believe 0.6.2.7. This initial
tech tree went to SU-8, GW Panther. People were allowed to
pre-order, and shortly thereafter play M6AE1 mutant heavies, @
0.6.2.1. I was mistaken about the other 2 though, Lowe and KV5 hit
0.6.4.00.But then again, M4E24 and A32 were allowed for purchase
and play, just as Mutant 6 was 0.6.2.1So naturally, while not alot
of time actually elapsed between the game being played 2010 and
artillery's very early release and eventual progression - the game
wasn't out there INITIALLY, with SPGs.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910605
choSenfroZen_1, on Sep 05 2021 - 00:01, said: Of course it is about credibility. You make loud proud
confident pronouncements. To start, based on a reroll
account with zero artillery games. Not a good start if you want to
change peoples minds, at best it is embarrassing. Your
actual account. The assumption is you have something to hide.
Before you start spouting about skills and other players,
show your cards or find another tack.
Link on message: #12910605

Draschel: Then simply watch skill4ltu and quickybaby reviews on what
playing artillery is all about.Why even bother listening to me, or
anyone else here. You want credibility?5 years ago, you could watch
Anfield and Sirfochs saying the same thing.What do you want to
hear, exactly? 11,000 PR players, saying the same thing.No,
artillery will not do great damage and get ridiculous scores, win
rates. Yes, artillery is quite helpless on its own and entirely
team/map dependent. But yes, artillery is extremely easy to play
and operates outside of games normal conventions, and allows anyone
to reasonably contribute, even against the greatest of opposition
tanks and/or players individual level, no matter the SPG
players efficacy in other classes. This is the biggest
problem. Artillery is not over-powered, it is broken. I invite
you, to go take a look at simple, easily found youtuber content, of
what excellent players with considerable personal rating, cross
class performance, experience - have to say about
artillery. You will find other excuses. Arty players
always do. Oh, re-roll. Then someone with heavenly stats thats
insane at every facet of the game, W/R, WN8, PR, DPG, ACE badges,
3-MOEs that you can clearly see, speaks up, Oh all you play is
meds. Oh, all you do is shoot premium shells and run bonds
equipment. Oh, all you do is platoon with others to carry you.
Frankly, you people are full of excuses, denial, and idiocy. You
have no credibility, so you cannot speak of credibility. You do not
understand world of tanks in general, and least of all have no
notions of credibility. Forward observers, generally
aren't the ones spotting. Unless they are situationally positional
light tank or something like E25. Forward observers like Chieftain,
kran wan, STB1, M48A tend to absorb most the artillery fire. Not
the TD in the back in hiding, camping, or light tanks. You know
nothing of the game at all. I invite you, to send messages to
excellent artillery players. They exist out there, sure. That
Ted_ guy, from Mahou. He has done many, many, many CW campaigns
using arty, and has 3-marked many. _xrays, has GC and M53 3-marked
too. You want to hear from EU? Approach that guy, Dr_Nix. All will
tell you what artillery is all about, its strong points, its
limitations, and how it is extremely different and not at all
representative of the rest of the games
classes.
Subject: E 75 TS 3D skin?
Link on message: #12910600
SteelRonin, on Sep 04 2021 - 17:36, said: Really? how did I miss it?, i was playing on
July 
EDIT: **** i missed it D:
Link on message: #12910600



Einzelganger7:
Indeed, the event had its own website and was a bit confusing starting by the fact we had to activate missions and once they were completed we needed to activate another one and so on. https://worldoftanks...hway-rock-0721/
Indeed, the event had its own website and was a bit confusing starting by the fact we had to activate missions and once they were completed we needed to activate another one and so on. https://worldoftanks...hway-rock-0721/
Subject: E 75 TS 3D skin?
Link on message: #12910592
SteelRonin, on Sep 04 2021 - 17:23, said: When?, it looks amazing 
Link on message: #12910592


Einzelganger7:
They just gave it for free during July by grinding points on the Highway Rock Encore event (the Borsig 3D style was available as well).
They just gave it for free during July by grinding points on the Highway Rock Encore event (the Borsig 3D style was available as well).
Subject: Grille 15 when will it get some love?
Link on message: #12910562
Draschel, on Sep 04 2021 - 22:40, said: - Increase horsepower to old engine of 900. Increase to old reverse
cap of 20, add track pivot of 30º for overall mobility
increase. - Increase muzzle velocity of HEAT to 1,145m/s. HE
pen should be 88mm, comparable at least to E100. -8º gun
depression, and forward arc increased to 60º - Improve camo to
10.89. That is the camo of Ferdinand. You mean to to me, a vehicle
Ferdinand size, is afforded more camo than Grille?
Blazefang, on Sep 04 2021 - 22:55, said:
a full turret with some camo would fix some of it but not all of it gun is just awful.
Link on message: #12910562

Draschel:

a full turret with some camo would fix some of it but not all of it gun is just awful.
Draschel: I believe these are enough. What we want to accomplish, is
not to have a TD playing like a medium tank. What we want, is a
more pleasant grille experience. Look at what happened to Hellcat,
FV4005. Same goes with WG reluctance, to have TD serving as
heavies. Which is why they couple extremely bad soft stats to
things like Badger, 110E4 - and eventually nerfed object 268
V4. 1 gun depression, 50 horsepower, 3 base camo, 10 arc
degrees, 5km/hr reverse, 13mm HE pen, HEAT velocity aren't
game-breaking or meta altering.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910558
ATruk, on Sep 04 2021 - 15:20, said: You don't play much arti, do you?
choSenfroZen_1, on Sep 04 2021 - 19:47, said: Let us start with your total lack of credibility. None, you go on
and on, 6 lines of babble. Sheer ignorance. You have zero
games, none. So your comments show your laughable and embarrassing
state. Now, it is more probably, you are just another rebooted
account, a reroll. Somehow thinking people will believe your
supposed "skills" in 2K games are meaningful. Before you
open your typewriter, perhaps either try something before
pronouncements. Or even better, put up or shut up. If you are
hiding your real account, there is probably a reason. Long
range, in-direct fire support. Harass, damage and convince enemies
to move from their hiding spots.
NeatoMan, on Sep 04 2021 - 13:45, said: It's kind of like those trap door tigers in gladiator; it
always made me wonder "why the heck did they put that in
there?", ....just had to throw in some random
Link on message: #12910558

Draschel: I played lots of arty, pre 9.17. Stopped with their damage
changes and stun mechanics. Won't continue, because arty absolutely
tanks PR and WN8. Not worth my time.Nowadays, I grind M40/43 in
frontlines. When finished, I will do Lorraine in FL. When finished,
I will do M53/55, Bat Chat 155, 212A in FL. Then I have 4 tier 10
SPG. Everything stated there was true. No classes are afforded
the advantages artillery have.

Draschel: We are not here to talk about credibility. We are here to
talk about content, game mechanics, classes, and performance within
classes and translatable skill for each class.But if you want to
bring up credibility, why not. I can post on an account, that
differs substantially, and you will change your excuses to
something else. That is how you people function.Furthermore, why
bring up credibility, when you completely lack credibility of your
own. And whatever content you have to post is just awful. Do you
not see your own service rec? I have told you again, go
through the patch numbers and listed history. People were placing
orders, testing Mutant 6 heavy tanks, before the game had arty tech
trees. The first artillery patch arrived, and people already
had Lowe tanks, KV5 tanks before. Not sure the exact step that was,
0.6.12? Something like that. Arty does not remove out enemy
from camped hiding. This is fallacy. It causes it. For every 1
blind shot or arty received splash from someone cowering, hiding -
arty shoots at forward spotted targets instead 15 times more. You
lack world of tanks experience, it is plainly seen from the content
you post. What good would it be even if someone would 10K PR rating
told you something. Your excuses would just change. Why is this the
case? Because the people, streamers, players, leaders we already
know already advocate, preach artillery is like this. Broken.
Your entire post is ignorance, and no means to know end. And WG
understands this fully, that is why they nerf the crap of arty
every 8 months? Arty is a punching bag that WG doesn't know what to
do with, except punch it around now and then

Draschel: what about the failed mutiny and coup d -etat storyline.
We didn't get to see any of that? I have always wondered, what the
movie would have been like if Maximus came into Rome with loyal
Roman legions, had another mass battle like the intro opening, only
to succeed and get mortally injured, and prior to passing give Rome
back to Gracchus, Graius, Cicero, Falco.
Subject: Grille 15 when will it get some love?
Link on message: #12910540
Link on message: #12910540
Draschel: When one really down and dirty, examines the problems with Grille,
alot can be learned and explained. The vehicle is a living
contrast. - great accuracy, aim-time...horrendously balanced
and evened out by ridiculous, SPG level dispersion stats. Any type
of movement blooms your gun like an arta- great horsepower, top
speed...again horrendously balanced and evened out by ridiculous
terrain mobility which are falsely represented, bad track traverse,
mediocre reverse I can see why these changes were implemented
long ago, it is at the time where fast heavy tanks like
WZ11111111115A, 277 did not exist, and 113, IS7, 260 were still
pre-buff and not so effective. Medium tanks like STB1, 140,
Leopard, 121 were also pre-buff, and 430U was not around. No EBR105
of course, or any EBR for that matter. When you account for all
these factors, and look at the specified pre-nerf grille, yes it
had propensity to be quite dangerous and be quite aggressive, like
pre-nerf hellcat playing like a medium tank. Or pre-nerf FV4005,
being able to be more aggressive and find more shot-opportunity.
However, as can be plainly seen we are present not past, and
aforementioned stuff has come to pass, Grille is certainly out of
its element. Even with its former self, it could not compete in its
old role due to new game meta, and speed everywhere. Why not return
Grille to its former self and even add a few too? -
Increase horsepower to old engine of 900. Increase to old reverse
cap of 20, add track pivot of 30º for overall mobility
increase. - Increase muzzle velocity of HEAT to 1,145m/s. HE
pen should be 88mm, comparable at least to E100. -8º gun
depression, and forward arc increased to 60º- Improve camo to
10.89. That is the camo of Ferdinand. You mean to to me, a vehicle
Ferdinand size, is afforded more camo than Grille?
Subject: Never understood XP for lack of performance
Link on message: #12910535
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Sep 04 2021 - 17:50, said:
If you don't spot anything, you don't fire a shot, don't block anything, how do you contribute anything to your team? Which is the case to many times. Your example would be one match out of thousands since no system is perfect that one time you would be screwed. But the thousands an tens of thousands of matches that the people doing absolutely nothing yet are rewarded currently win or lose is silly. Dont let the tail wag the dog is an old saying but applied in your example.
Link on message: #12910535

If you don't spot anything, you don't fire a shot, don't block anything, how do you contribute anything to your team? Which is the case to many times. Your example would be one match out of thousands since no system is perfect that one time you would be screwed. But the thousands an tens of thousands of matches that the people doing absolutely nothing yet are rewarded currently win or lose is silly. Dont let the tail wag the dog is an old saying but applied in your example.
DeviouslyCursed: Well, I also don't have an issue with people who are bad
sharing the win xp. Keep in mind, it's all those 0 dmg players on
your team that lets you gets those 5-6K+ dmg games.
Subject: Can wg do anything right?
Link on message: #12910521
Link on message: #12910521
Jaguarz: I wiped wargamings cookies then it went away next time I accepted
Subject: Bots in lower tiers
Link on message: #12910480
dunniteowl, on Sep 04 2021 - 17:14, said: The guys at the corner store were surprised. One
guy, who seems to like me, said, "Smithville is getting beaten by
Gorton!" Knowing that he was talking High School, I
asked, "What sport are we talking here, football?" He
affirmed. I then said, "Well my daughter is -- let's see,
born in 1992, it's 2021, so she's what, almost thirty now? I
haven't paid attention to High School for fifteen years or so."
Then that guy says, "Your daughter's younger than I am, I'm
35." I laughed and said, "Well, I'm 60, almost 61."
Then they all looked at me (everyone in the store) and it
was quiet for like four seconds. I could see the wheels
turning -- he's SIXTY?!? Really?!? I don't look my age
and, powers of the universe willing I will NEVER ACT my age.
Boomer in age, 21st Century Renaissance Man in thinking and 100%
happy little kid at heart. And for the record,
smoking weed doesn't make you do stupid things unless you're stupid
to begin with. Alcohol IS the gateway drug. Meth is
more likely to make you do stupid things even if you weren't stupid
to start off with, because it blows your judgment and cognition
centers by firing off too much crap at once. Now you've been
better informed. BOTS are in tiers I-V now and have
been since they added that Novice MM crap. I've not seen BOTS
above tier III. I played a couple tier III and a tier II
match in the last few months and only saw BOTs in two of those
battles. The tier II and one tier III battle. I imagine
that were I to play them repeatedly, I'd see more. I have NOT
seen any bots in tier IV (Hey, I LIKE the Alecto and M8A1, even
though I don't do that well in them) or tier V. Even very
late at night when the server numbers are low, I have not seen BOTs
in tiers IV and V (tiers I-V are where BOTs CAN be found, both on
the US and SA servers). GL, HF &
HSYBF!
OvO
Link on message: #12910480

OvO
1LT_Dwayne: The first battle i played had bots and for the next 20 or so there
were none. I can't really complain I was just surprised that they
added bots. And nice story btw but one thing i can say about weed
is it killed my motivation for almost everything I wanted to do so
I stopped taking it.
Subject: Never understood XP for lack of performance
Link on message: #12910424
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Sep 04 2021 - 15:43, said:
Mark how about for once you ACTUALLY READ a post because it is obvious again you did not. Now again I was not complaining about how much I got HENCE the highlighted section. Try reading it helps you to make intelligent comments. Now write an apology to the forums.
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Sep 04 2021 - 15:47, said:
But at least he fired. I see people that do nothing an sit get credits an XP. It fosters doing nothing win or lose. Losers bottom half IMO should get nothing but credits to repair that it no XP. Winning team if you contribute nothing you get the same. IMO it would reduce the bots considerably.
Link on message: #12910424

Mark how about for once you ACTUALLY READ a post because it is obvious again you did not. Now again I was not complaining about how much I got HENCE the highlighted section. Try reading it helps you to make intelligent comments. Now write an apology to the forums.
DeviouslyCursed:

But at least he fired. I see people that do nothing an sit get credits an XP. It fosters doing nothing win or lose. Losers bottom half IMO should get nothing but credits to repair that it no XP. Winning team if you contribute nothing you get the same. IMO it would reduce the bots considerably.
DeviouslyCursed: This is wrong. You have no idea if they contributed or
not. Back when I had XVM, map was cliff. I had my Cent I or
Cent 7/1, can't remember which. We had a purple in a T62A.
Start of map we went to take and hold the West part of Center, that
overlooks valley, the most important spot to hold. He pulled out,
took a shot, and got tracked, he repaired and started to back up
and got tracked again. There were two arty on the map and I knew
instantly what was about to happen. I slid my Cent right up beside
his, pushing him a little bit more broadside but completely covered
by my Cent, and SMACK - SMACK! Two arty shells obliterated my tank.
I died with 0 damage and basically "no contribution," but the T62A
didn't take any damage from the arties. The T62A went on to get
over 5K dmg and carried a close game. Technically I did
nothing from a end game stats point of view. But make no mistake: I
won that game for us, just as much as the T62A did. Guy
messaged me after the game and thanking me, acknowledging I won the
map because of that move despite being either bottom or next to
last in xp with 0 dmg. Do the bottom people do things like
that a lot? No. But it doesn't matter, a win is a
win. DISCLAIMER: This was on my main, Eagle5, before someone
points out I don't have those tanks on this account. And back then
I was blue, so sacrificing myself to attempt to save a purple was
risky. But he was also higher tier. It's crazy all that went
through my mind in about .5 seconds when I was deciding whether to
help or not.
Subject: Never understood XP for lack of performance
Link on message: #12910410
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Sep 04 2021 - 06:52, said: How does WG justify the amount of XP handed out to players who do
nothing or real close to nothing on a winning team. Then give less
to one of the top three players on the losing team. Example tonight
I was in my T-103. Not a great match but second on my team. 2600
damage, 1360 block spotted 3 tanks and 300 spot damage. I was
awarded a whooping 364 XP. Red team T-27 Skoda did nothing. Meaning
absolutely nothing was awarded 365 XP because he spotted three
tanks. No shots no spot damage zero basically. M-41D nothing again
an this time absolutely nothing. He was awarded 368 XP. VK-75 120
damage 1 spot that's all. He was given 402 XP. WoT may have a bot
issue. But to hand out XP an credits to players like M-41D does
nothing but promote sitting an doing nothing. Just because these
players were on a team that won and on the backs of the other
players they got rewarded for doing basically nothing doesn't make
sense to me. I was on the losing team an I understand having less
than the winners no issue there but WG IMO needs to hand out zero
rewards to players Like the M41 an really all three win or lose.
Link on message: #12910410

DeviouslyCursed: The primary consideration should be if you win or lose. We
don't need the toxic game play from Ranked invading Random. It's
already difficult enough to get players to play for the team and
the win, we don't need selfish game play rewarded.
Subject: Never understood XP for lack of performance
Link on message: #12910402
TheJeep1, on Sep 04 2021 - 03:04, said: There should be nothing given to the losers. 0 Awards would
promote better play, people would generally try to learn the game
and how to win.
Link on message: #12910402

TeriyakiTanker: That would ruin the game and really isnt a good idea. About
the only thing you could do would be to give the worst players on a
team no EXP but if you took away silver I would think most people
wouldn't be able to play the game.
Subject: Hey, don't follow me down the 2 line on Prok!
Link on message: #12910400
The_Pink_Panther, on Sep 04 2021 - 04:20, said:
Doesn't tell you a thing. I find just as many stupid people who are supposed to be good players doing the exact same thing or type thereof. I don't worry about stats, they are worthless. I have seen so many so called unicrumbs get wasted in the first 3 minutes until I am sick of it. So stats just don't mean crap anymore as stupidity runs equally amongst all players.
Link on message: #12910400

Doesn't tell you a thing. I find just as many stupid people who are supposed to be good players doing the exact same thing or type thereof. I don't worry about stats, they are worthless. I have seen so many so called unicrumbs get wasted in the first 3 minutes until I am sick of it. So stats just don't mean crap anymore as stupidity runs equally amongst all players.
Jaguarz: High risk plays yield large rewards if they pan out, not
every "good" player sits at the red line waiting for team to die to
pad damage and an8
Subject: Bots in lower tiers
Link on message: #12910380
WarGanz_87, on Sep 03 2021 - 16:34, said: Plus, you got people like this 65 year old phart that
are just dead tired from working all day and just want to do
something besides vegetate in front of the damn TV, At
the end of the day, I’m tired. I’m 65 and not 25. And I know that
when I’m tired like that, I’m not up to playing Tier IX or X at a
competitive level so I would be a liability to whatever team I’m
on. There I said it. #MyReality So, I load up some
lower tiers and go hunting seal clubbers on the SA server. Got a
non-Hispanic sounding name and >25k battles showing, yep, I’m
looking for you. Load in and the opponents look like genuine n00bs.
You get a break. I may track you with HE to escape to go kill more
bots. But if you get me, no tears. Feces occurs. If I complete the
daily mission by killing X# tanks, I’ll pull up, do the @Skill4ltu
salute, and let the n00b kill me. Make 250K -
500K credits a night doing this. Stats on anything belowTier
6 are meaningless. Don’t like my stats? Don’t look at them.
#ZFG. Stay off my lawn and don’t look at my stats.
Now Friday, Saturday, and Sunday are different. Grind my
IS-7 or Obj 240 crews through all the Tier VII & VIII premiums.
That does matter to me since I want/need the XP for the new Field
Modifications and I do that on the USC server.
Link on message: #12910380

1LT_Dwayne: Why do you play this game when you're tired? There are plenty of
games that don't requires high level of mental. When I'm tired I go
play red dead redemption for exemple and I have to add that when
I'm talking about low tier I mean tier 1-4. The level of play there
is really low and I'm pretty sure anyone can have a couple of
good battles here and there. Anyway I fixed my problem. I'll only
play low tier on friday night.
Subject: Changing how daily missions are displayed in your garage?
Link on message: #12910357
Link on message: #12910357
TeriyakiTanker: Thanks, that worked. I changed my graphic settings to ultra
and it changed it.
Subject: Changing how daily missions are displayed in your garage?
Link on message: #12910348
Link on message: #12910348
TeriyakiTanker: Some streamers have their daily missions displayed in their garage
so that it shows the requirements right on the screen in the garage
instead of just the icon for them. Is this a mod or something
that can be changed without using mods?
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910334
Link on message: #12910334
Draschel: There are bad chieftain and 279E drivers out there. You seem
them, 2,500 DPG. But you look at their super conqueror,
or 705A or IS7 - and you see like 1,800. This is an obvious failing
in terms of balance, I agree. No one said anything about
dealing lots of damage in an artillery. People, well the one's for
wiser, just kno it is easier to do so with less effort spent per
point. Your bat chat 25 does 1,800. Your bat chat does 1,200.
That is 2/3rd the capacity. But you play your bat chat FAR MORE
STRENUOSLY, than the artillery. For all we know, at least in
my experience, both playing them and seeing content from creators,
it isn't 66% of the effort for 66% of the damage.....Think more of
20% the effort. 66% the result. That ratio...And don't leave out
assistance. I think tracking / stun tends to be more than tank
category spotting / tracking Bat Chat arty needs some love.
They need to return ventilation to lorraine, lorraine 2.0, 155, and
158. 158 needs the 4-shot drum back, 155 can be the 3-shotBring
back the M46 suspension with bat chat 155 turret as tier
9 premium artillery, 2-shot drum. And let the game rage
on.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910330
Link on message: #12910330
Draschel: and it is funny, what you say is a balanced tank.
Hilarious. Because without 907, without chieftain, without
279E, and when 260 was mediocre? Meta was full of complaints,
Maus too armored! Too much HP. Type 5 unfair derp gun! Super
conqueror instantly replacing 113 / T110E5 I worked so hard for?
Wth 110E5 cupola?140 too strong, why 140 buffs? Why release fast
heavy to screw meta, like WZ1115A? What, who, why 268 V4 and
430U released as they were, and took so long for nerfing?What
the.... Leopard with all those boons? Wth, why not AMX30
that way too? Bad players, just do not understand
the game. Like to think, pretend they do though. They speak of
which what they do not know. You can't talk of balance, because you
do not understand the scales of balance to begin with. World
of tanks doesn't need the tier X examples, tier 6 examples,
or of defender, progetto, bourrat, skorpion G or SU130PM,
EBR75 or LT432 to throw balance out of whack. Because before those
there were the other, go-to offenders that were crux and meta. The
whole idea of you saying things are fine, balanced if 260, 279E,
907, VK7201, chieftain are suddenly gone - is laughable. More
balanced? Sure I can see that, but how far does the notch shift on
the weight scale towards balance, truly. Can people take out their
AMX54, IS4, AMX30B, E50M, Cent AX, Sheridan for competition if and
when, tier X reward vehicles are suddenly removed? No. Unless you
want to lose.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910327
choSenfroZen_1, on Sep 04 2021 - 06:09, said: In just a few clicks shows, he has zero experience. He says arty is
simple, yet has no games.
2Fantastic, on Sep 04 2021 - 08:25, said: Please let them migrate to balanced tanks. Balanced tanks are far
better than completely busted tanks. All for that. they will
not get the same result in a wz as a chieftain, because a wz is a
fair tank. no unicum would ever claim they can do just as
good as a chieftain with a balanced tank. I honestly think a
279e requires less thought than arty to have a far greater impact.
Especially after arty/HE nerf.
Link on message: #12910327

Draschel: There is no strenuous combat in an artillery, unless you
are last alive or the team allows a tank through. Even if
inaccurate, bad dispersion, artillery is afforded the most time to
aim, shoot in safety, and shots are not do-or-die like other
classesArtillery are usually afforded more safety in base defensive
guards, than other classes require. Artillery have bad camo,
but generally hang out in pure forested areas, where Type 5 can
even hideArtillery does not need to aim, know armor weakspots. Just
shoot, hope you hit. Miss by 20ft? Deal damage and
stun.Artillery is afforded the opportunity to damage enemies with
obstacles in the way, well beyond 720m cap tanks have

Draschel: I agreed with you. I said those tanks were too strong. You
seem to be leaving out though, that I did not also say, they would
REPLICATE their performances if the tanks were removed. I
simply said they would still dominate, just dominating with less
DPG, spotting, W/R than with those ridiculous tanks. But make no
mistake, they will still be there at the top, carrying battles with
super conq, IS7, 430U, 268 V4. Have you seen Iyouxin grinding out
tanks like 113? 140? Leopard? He does so 4,000+ consistent, with
another 1,000 assisted. Would he do more in chieftain, 907? Yes,
likely. But you aren't robbing people of this glory, if those tanks
are taken away. They just kick a-- in whatever they are in. Except
an artillery, because an overflow of skill doesn't solve artillery
limits. 279E is a pretty dumb proof tank. But still
needs more skill sets than artillery. And again,
and again, and again - the game didn't exist at the start, with
artillery.People were buying Mutant 6, Lowe, KV5 before arty even
were released.Artillery was released in a very early patch, up to
tier 6 only. Before progressing
Subject: End of Game RNG/Mechanics
Link on message: #12910315
umkhulu, on Sep 04 2021 - 03:19, said: This really is turning out to be a thread of trolls trying to put a
member in their place. Seems they are not having much luck -
maybe we should all stand up to the trolls like Maniac and put them
in their place!....
Link on message: #12910315


DeviouslyCursed: I agree, Maniac should be put in his place.
Subject: WG really needs to consider its event schedules
Link on message: #12910300
Link on message: #12910300
DeviouslyCursed: It's a shame that you are required to do every event, all the way
through, every time. ...oh wait. EDIT:
We could go back to 9 years ago when there were no events, no
missions, and once every two months you got a x3 weekend and that
was considered a massive event.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910287
choSenfroZen_1, on Sep 04 2021 - 05:38, said: They join a game that existed already is its basic form. Then
decide it is broken. Joins a soccer team. Learns , practices and
develops skills.
Link on message: #12910287

Draschel: As said countless times before, world of tanks did not start
with artillery. They were added. Imagine when you play soccer,
common 3-5-2 setup, the 3 guys in the back can do physical,
tangible, effecting things to players with / near the
ball Imagine hockey, where the players on the bench can
physically, tangibly, effectually influence, assault the players on
the ice with puck.Imagine any contest like this, where a third
party long-reaching presence projects force, damage, area
denial with an all-seeing virtual birds eye view A goalie
works out extensively like any other, as an athlete himself. A
goalie works on reflexes, injury prevention, muscle mass.
They need great sight. Particularly, goalies with keen defensive
sense, can help out their defenders in lacrosse/hockey/soccer by
having intuition and acting quickly. Also, they can jump start
offense with their plays such as soccer long-ball, and attempting
plays while opposition is switching out (hockey line
changes) I am not sure you know much of artillery, or
soccer.
Subject: I hate mm......
Link on message: #12910220
Link on message: #12910220
DeviouslyCursed: Good lord, sort your end game results by xp, or dmg. The OCD in me
is hating that screenshot.
Subject: End of Game RNG/Mechanics
Link on message: #12910214
Maniac57c, on Sep 04 2021 - 02:44, said: "Honest debate" such as calling me brainless, stupid, illogical,
hypocritical, delusional, etc? No thanks. You cool kids don't
debate. You insult, denigrate, accuse and belittle.
umkhulu, on Sep 04 2021 - 03:19, said: This really is turning out to be a thread of trolls trying to put a
member in their place. Seems they are not having much luck -
maybe we should all stand up to the trolls like Maniac and put them
in their place!....
Link on message: #12910214

DeviouslyCursed:


DeviouslyCursed: I have tried to debate for 3 pages now, with no insults and
no "trollish" behavior, and all I've gotten was insulted by the
person who claims he doesn't insult people. But let's try it
again Fifth post, no insults from me or "trollish"
behavior. If the rigging is obvious, why do the people who
claim rigging have different views on how it is rigged? It should
be clear if it is obvious. Some say RNG rigged at the
start to determine which team wins. At least one says rigged at the
end once one team is winning. Some say rigged by MM by placing good
players on one team. Some say rigged to produce streaks. Some say
rigged to keep you at 50%. Some (like you I think, because you
don't commit to anything precise) say it's rigged more
individually. If it is so obvious, and so clear, why do the
people who claim it's rigged not agree with each other? If it's so
obvious, and you guys are just more observant than others, then you
should all be on the same page. But you are not. What is
your answer to that? Side Note: Oh the irony of
how Umkhulu's post is worded...
Subject: I have played 5 games so far this marathon...
Link on message: #12910104
Link on message: #12910104
Jaguarz: I finished it just to take something for free with giving wargaming
cash. Now I wont play for a while to compensate.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910087
242dEngrBn, on Sep 03 2021 - 23:53, said: You guys don't whine because arty makes the game unbalanced, you
whine because it makes it harder. If it wasn't for arty, you
guys would be laying out in the open like fat lazy dogs. Arty
keeps you honest and you don't like it. If it were up to you,
WoT would resemble a shooting gallery where you could see the
enemy, they couldn't see you, and all you had to do was shoot gold
against helpless targets.
Link on message: #12910087

Draschel: arty does not make the game harder. Artillery are low damage
per game earners, that are far less threatening than many dangerous
tanks out there. They are a frustration element. A single tank like
chieftain, 260, 279E can earn 3x the lethality any single tier X
artillery, and do it more consistent. This isn't a frustration
element. This will kill you, and offers poor probability to damage
it in return. Dealing with an overpowered tank is hard. Dealing
with artillery, isn't. Everyone complains about
artillery because it is unbalanced, broken. You need to get your
things right.
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910074
Link on message: #12910074
Draschel: If anyone is spotted, they can be killed easily. Arty just tends to
be the easiest. Artillery needs position. But it needs the
least amount of positioning required. Most of the time sitting at
base is fine. Frequently, all the moving artillery seeks to
do, is either going into bushes beginning, or late game relocation
maybe. Arty does have a difficult time hitting targets. But
what accuracy doesn't tell us, is that how much shots artillery
takes that lead to some damage?Missing the enemy tank by 6m and
dealing 150 damage isn't a bad deal. Especially with the enemy tank
crouched behind tall solid cover.Yes, arty can go all game without
hitting someone. All game doing splash damage hits meters and
meters away from the target. Arty inaccuracy, long
aim-time, bad dispersion are weighted in. Arty have the safest
environment, most time available to aim Arty do not require
speed really for their positioning, but rather only situationally
for relocation late game Arty don't participate in team
maneuvers or spotting. Its a force multiplier not a physical
participant. Only spotting arty does is from heavy bush, which
it does fine Arty is the single most nerfed class rightfully,
because it is the single most broken, detached part of the game.
And WG understands it.
Subject: Would You Rather... Play Great and Lose, or Play Like Crap and Win?
Link on message: #12910070
Link on message: #12910070
Draschel: Winning is definitely preferred to losing? Sure However,
the choice being asked here about which of the 2. I would
rather lose and perform greatly, as much possibleThan win, and get
that win doing little if anything.
Subject: Incoming! September Preview!
Link on message: #12910062
Link on message: #12910062
KRZYBooP: Thank you everyone for the good laugh! You guys are
amazing and I appreciate everyone's dedication to the game. I
was late so I gave yall 5 instead of 3. Happy long
weekend!
Subject: What's wrong with arty?
Link on message: #12910035
ATruk, on Sep 03 2021 - 21:46, said: TDs do that to me too, more frequently than arti.
Link on message: #12910035

Draschel: But TD frequently get spotted/shot in return for doing
that.But TD need the position to do that, arty just lobs from
afarBut TD can't shoot over obstacles, mountain ranges.But TD need
to aim their shots arty just wants to hit.But TD really have to be
paying attention to map circlesBut TD can go alongside pushes,
sharing HP/Focus fire it is a lucky arty hit, like 1 in
15. But the problem, these hits are free, without effort
or real threat in return.
Subject: 4 guys and a dog!
Link on message: #12910008
XXBuckShot, on Sep 02 2021 - 13:03, said: I'd like to watch that actually. I wonder how hard it'd be to find
it? It probably wouldnt have english subtitiles anyway.....
Hey very cool name 4TankersAndDog. I learned something today!
Link on message: #12910008

Elias_K_Grodin: It's available on Amazon in a box set.https://www.amazon.c...s/dp/B002ZQENC8 In terms
of streaming, it might only be available on Amazon EU if you have a
good VPN/proxy setup.
Реклама | Adv