What's wrong with arty?

Draschel:  There is no strenuous combat in an artillery, unless you are last alive or the team allows a tank through. Even if inaccurate, bad dispersion, artillery is afforded the most time to aim, shoot in safety, and shots are not do-or-die like other classesArtillery are usually afforded more safety in base defensive guards, than other classes require. Artillery have bad camo, but generally hang out in pure forested areas, where Type 5 can even hideArtillery does not need to aim, know armor weakspots. Just shoot, hope you hit. Miss by 20ft? Deal damage and stun.Artillery is afforded the opportunity to damage enemies with obstacles in the way, well beyond 720m cap tanks have 

Draschel:  I agreed with you. I said those tanks were too strong. You seem to be leaving out though, that I did not also say, they would REPLICATE their performances if the tanks were removed. I simply said they would still dominate, just dominating with less DPG, spotting, W/R than with those ridiculous tanks. But make no mistake, they will still be there at the top, carrying battles with super conq, IS7, 430U, 268 V4. Have you seen Iyouxin grinding out tanks like 113? 140? Leopard? He does so 4,000+ consistent, with another 1,000 assisted. Would he do more in chieftain, 907? Yes, likely. But you aren't robbing people of this glory, if those tanks are taken away. They just kick a-- in whatever they are in. Except an artillery, because an overflow of skill doesn't solve artillery limits.  279E is a pretty dumb proof tank. But still needs more skill sets than artillery.   And again, and again, and again - the game didn't exist at the start, with artillery.People were buying Mutant 6, Lowe, KV5 before arty even were released.Artillery was released in a very early patch, up to tier 6 only. Before progressing