Never understood XP for lack of performance

Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Sep 04 2021 - 06:52, said: How does WG justify the amount of XP handed out to players who do nothing or real close to nothing on a winning team. Then give less to one of the top three players on the losing team. Example tonight I was in my T-103. Not a great match but second on my team. 2600 damage, 1360 block spotted 3 tanks and 300 spot damage. I was awarded a whooping 364 XP. Red team T-27 Skoda did nothing. Meaning absolutely nothing was awarded 365 XP because he spotted three tanks. No shots no spot damage zero basically. M-41D nothing again an this time absolutely nothing. He was awarded 368 XP. VK-75 120 damage 1 spot that's all. He was given 402 XP. WoT may have a bot issue. But to hand out XP an credits to players like M-41D does nothing but promote sitting an doing nothing. Just because these players were on a team that won and on the backs of the other players they got rewarded for doing basically nothing doesn't make sense to me. I was on the losing team an I understand having less than the winners no issue there but WG IMO needs to hand out zero rewards to players Like the M41 an really all three win or lose.