Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Lert
All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
23.12.2014 17:11:22
Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8311966
Link on message: #8311966
Lert: Offer your account on ebay and see how many bills it pays.
TragicLoss
Missing 03_campania.pkg
23.12.2014 15:46:26
Subject: Missing 03_campania.pkg
Link on message: #8311644
Link on message: #8311644
TragicLoss: There's a way to force the game client to scan itself for missing
resources and downloading them, i'm not sure where I remember
reading it, but there is... Sorry I can't help you more. Try
this: http://forum.worldof...-missing-files/
Lert
All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
23.12.2014 15:38:52
Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8311622
Link on message: #8311622
Lert: 2139, so quite a ways down the list.
Lert
Lert's honest Firefly review!
23.12.2014 15:34:38
Subject: Lert's honest Firefly review!
Link on message: #8311609
Link on message: #8311609
Lert: I'm 99% convinced it's functional. Yes it is:
Lert
All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
23.12.2014 15:21:29
Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8311563
Link on message: #8311563
Lert: Yep, got that.
Lert
All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
23.12.2014 15:19:27
Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8311554
Link on message: #8311554
Lert: That's for the tier 2 gift tank, not the campaign reward tank.
Lert
All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
23.12.2014 15:16:46
Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8311547
Link on message: #8311547
Lert: Huh. Strange that you people don't have it yet. I got an e-mail and
everything. 
...... Sux2bu I guess? Just kidding. Take this as proof that
they're working on it and yours is underway if you don't have it
yet.
...... Sux2bu I guess? Just kidding. Take this as proof that
they're working on it and yours is underway if you don't have it
yet. Lert
All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
23.12.2014 15:01:50
Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8311495
Link on message: #8311495
Lert: Now we just wait for the camo.
The_Chieftain
Arty, Discourages Camping? (Not Hate Thread)
23.12.2014 11:51:39
Subject: Arty, Discourages Camping? (Not Hate Thread)
Link on message: #8311225
Battlecruiser, on Dec 22 2014 - 01:08, said: here are some questions I ask myself. After every shot I ask
"have I overstayed my welcome? have I been lit too long?"
Sexy_Dave, on Dec 22 2014 - 03:16, said: So...as an arty player, you're saying players getting those big
tier 9 and t10 tanks should outfit them not for damage, but so that
they can soak up artillery fire for the team? Interesting.
Quote and just looked up the spall liners..not sure adding 500-1500kg to your tank that has issues dodging arty is really the way to go.
PityFool, on Dec 22 2014 - 10:10, said: Would it surprise you if I said that too many people playing arty
use XVM as an attempt to win games by focusing the "purples".
Seriously, we get focused no matter what tank we are playing, hell
I've been focused by 3 tier 8 arty while playing an ELC, they spend
the entire game trying to shoot me. For a lot of us, this is a
really fun-sapping part of the game, our ability to win games
results in us being the focus of abnormal amounts of incoming fire,
while we have absolutely no means of returning fire, for the arty
its all reward with no risk. Then you get people who are in
the lesser skill range who try to explain to us that arty is easily
avoidable, meanwhile, they don't receive a fraction of the
attention we do.
Link on message: #8311225
Battlecruiser, on Dec 22 2014 - 01:08, said: here are some questions I ask myself. After every shot I ask
"have I overstayed my welcome? have I been lit too long?" The_Chieftain: Almost always when I get killed by arty, my response to
myself is "Well, I saw -that- one coming" because almost always,
I've asked myself "Have I been here too long?" answer "Yes", and
foolishly stay to get that one last shot in...
Sexy_Dave, on Dec 22 2014 - 03:16, said: So...as an arty player, you're saying players getting those big
tier 9 and t10 tanks should outfit them not for damage, but so that
they can soak up artillery fire for the team? Interesting. The_Chieftain: Yep. Face it. If you're in a
Maus/T95/JagdE100/Otherbigthing, you're going to be a prime target
for artillery. Those big things are the primary prey for artillery,
indeed, in the great Rock/Paper/Scissors of the game environment,
they are the primary reason for artillery's existence. This being a
given, you can either just deal with it as a hazard, or you can
accept it and try to use it to your advantage.
Quote and just looked up the spall liners..not sure adding 500-1500kg to your tank that has issues dodging arty is really the way to go.
The_Chieftain: You've said it yourself. These vehicles already have issues
dodging arty, and you -will- take arty damage. You may be able to
avoid the direct hit, but you are unlikely to avoid the splash.
Accept it now, and be equipped accordingly. And, frankly, 1,500kg
isn't a hell of a lot on your 100-ton+ tank.
PityFool, on Dec 22 2014 - 10:10, said: Would it surprise you if I said that too many people playing arty
use XVM as an attempt to win games by focusing the "purples".
Seriously, we get focused no matter what tank we are playing, hell
I've been focused by 3 tier 8 arty while playing an ELC, they spend
the entire game trying to shoot me. For a lot of us, this is a
really fun-sapping part of the game, our ability to win games
results in us being the focus of abnormal amounts of incoming fire,
while we have absolutely no means of returning fire, for the arty
its all reward with no risk. Then you get people who are in
the lesser skill range who try to explain to us that arty is easily
avoidable, meanwhile, they don't receive a fraction of the
attention we do.The_Chieftain: I bold the important bit. So these guys are apparently
focusing on you for the entire game, and thus spending said entire
game not applying damage to your bigger, heavier team mates. I'm
going to hazard a rough guess that you won this one as your
unmolested heavies rolled over their main line force who were
receiving no artillery support? If so, congratulations, enemy arty
were idiots and you did well. Where's the problem?
The_Chieftain
Sherman Firefly- First Impression
23.12.2014 07:15:28
Subject: Sherman Firefly- First Impression
Link on message: #8310553
Link on message: #8310553
The_Chieftain: Odd. It should be rather lousy depression. About 5 degrees.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 50
23.12.2014 04:38:17
Subject: Skirmish 50
Link on message: #8309927
HighPitch, on Dec 22 2014 - 18:28, said: When did they change the start time to 10.30?
Link on message: #8309927
HighPitch, on Dec 22 2014 - 18:28, said: When did they change the start time to 10.30?Captain_Judo: The start time remains the same. Please have your team ready
for 7:00 pacific, 10:00 eastern.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 50
23.12.2014 04:38:17
Subject: Skirmish 50
Link on message: #8309927
HighPitch, on Dec 22 2014 - 18:28, said: When did they change the start time to 10.30?
Link on message: #8309927
HighPitch, on Dec 22 2014 - 18:28, said: When did they change the start time to 10.30?Captain_Judo: The start time remains the same. Please have your team ready
for 7:00 pacific, 10:00 eastern.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 50
23.12.2014 04:38:17
Subject: Skirmish 50
Link on message: #8309927
HighPitch, on Dec 22 2014 - 18:28, said: When did they change the start time to 10.30?
Link on message: #8309927
HighPitch, on Dec 22 2014 - 18:28, said: When did they change the start time to 10.30?Captain_Judo: The start time remains the same. Please have your team ready
for 7:00 pacific, 10:00 eastern.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 50
23.12.2014 04:01:48
Subject: Skirmish 50
Link on message: #8309761
Keokuk, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:50, said: My team schedule is showing battles for 23, 24 and 25 of dec, not
today as it appeared in the announcement. Are other teams having
this same issue?
GeoAtuin, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:56, said: I'm in Europe so I have battles today(23 dec) for USA it is 22 dec
22.30 EST. It's ok but why are there battle schedulded for 3 group
stages?
Link on message: #8309761
Keokuk, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:50, said: My team schedule is showing battles for 23, 24 and 25 of dec, not
today as it appeared in the announcement. Are other teams having
this same issue?Captain_Judo: I show your team has battles tonight and tomorrow at the
original time. Please double check for me.
GeoAtuin, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:56, said: I'm in Europe so I have battles today(23 dec) for USA it is 22 dec
22.30 EST. It's ok but why are there battle schedulded for 3 group
stages?Captain_Judo: Correct and thank you. Battles are scheduled for the entire
alpha stage. No battles for day three.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 50
23.12.2014 04:01:48
Subject: Skirmish 50
Link on message: #8309761
Keokuk, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:50, said: My team schedule is showing battles for 23, 24 and 25 of dec, not
today as it appeared in the announcement. Are other teams having
this same issue?
GeoAtuin, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:56, said: I'm in Europe so I have battles today(23 dec) for USA it is 22 dec
22.30 EST. It's ok but why are there battle schedulded for 3 group
stages?
Link on message: #8309761
Keokuk, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:50, said: My team schedule is showing battles for 23, 24 and 25 of dec, not
today as it appeared in the announcement. Are other teams having
this same issue?Captain_Judo: I show your team has battles tonight and tomorrow at the
original time. Please double check for me.
GeoAtuin, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:56, said: I'm in Europe so I have battles today(23 dec) for USA it is 22 dec
22.30 EST. It's ok but why are there battle schedulded for 3 group
stages?Captain_Judo: Correct and thank you. Battles are scheduled for the entire
alpha stage. No battles for day three.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 50
23.12.2014 04:01:48
Subject: Skirmish 50
Link on message: #8309761
Keokuk, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:50, said: My team schedule is showing battles for 23, 24 and 25 of dec, not
today as it appeared in the announcement. Are other teams having
this same issue?
GeoAtuin, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:56, said: I'm in Europe so I have battles today(23 dec) for USA it is 22 dec
22.30 EST. It's ok but why are there battle schedulded for 3 group
stages?
Link on message: #8309761
Keokuk, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:50, said: My team schedule is showing battles for 23, 24 and 25 of dec, not
today as it appeared in the announcement. Are other teams having
this same issue?Captain_Judo: I show your team has battles tonight and tomorrow at the
original time. Please double check for me.
GeoAtuin, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:56, said: I'm in Europe so I have battles today(23 dec) for USA it is 22 dec
22.30 EST. It's ok but why are there battle schedulded for 3 group
stages?Captain_Judo: Correct and thank you. Battles are scheduled for the entire
alpha stage. No battles for day three.
The_Chieftain
Springtime for T110 and the Americas
23.12.2014 01:51:13
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8309079
shapeshifter, on Dec 22 2014 - 10:34, said: these boxes looks promising. Tank Test Reports and Related
Records, 1944 - 1944 http://research.arch...ription/5897871 Scope &
Content This series consists of tank test reports and blueprint
drawings. Variant Control Numbers ARC Identifier: 5897871
Declassification Project Number: NND 745001 HMS/MLR Entry Number:
UD 1051 Archived Copies Copy 1: Preservation-Reproduction-Reference
Extent (Size): 1 linear foot, 9 linear inches Contact(s): National
Archives at College Park - Textual Reference (Military)
(RD-DC-2-MIL), National Archives at College Park
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
Phone: 301-837-3510
Fax: 301-837-1752
Email: Archives2reference@nara.gov Count: Legal Archives Box, Standard 4.0 Copy 1 Media Information: Specific Media Type: Paper Container Id: Boxes 4904-4907 Container List: Container 4904: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4905: Tank Test Reports Blue Prints THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4906: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4907: Tank Test Reports: Blue Prints, Drawings THRU Tank Test Reports
Link on message: #8309079
shapeshifter, on Dec 22 2014 - 10:34, said: these boxes looks promising. Tank Test Reports and Related
Records, 1944 - 1944 http://research.arch...ription/5897871 Scope &
Content This series consists of tank test reports and blueprint
drawings. Variant Control Numbers ARC Identifier: 5897871
Declassification Project Number: NND 745001 HMS/MLR Entry Number:
UD 1051 Archived Copies Copy 1: Preservation-Reproduction-Reference
Extent (Size): 1 linear foot, 9 linear inches Contact(s): National
Archives at College Park - Textual Reference (Military)
(RD-DC-2-MIL), National Archives at College Park8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
Phone: 301-837-3510
Fax: 301-837-1752
Email: Archives2reference@nara.gov Count: Legal Archives Box, Standard 4.0 Copy 1 Media Information: Specific Media Type: Paper Container Id: Boxes 4904-4907 Container List: Container 4904: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4905: Tank Test Reports Blue Prints THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4906: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4907: Tank Test Reports: Blue Prints, Drawings THRU Tank Test Reports
The_Chieftain: Variant Control Numbers ARC Identifier: 5897871 Declassification
Project Number: NND 745001 HMS/MLR Entry Number: UD 1051 Archived
Copies Copy 1: Preservation-Reproduction-Reference Extent (Size): 1
linear foot, 9 linear inches Contact(s): National Archives at
College Park - Textual Reference (Military) (RD-DC-2-MIL), National
Archives at College Park
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
Phone: 301-837-3510
Fax: 301-837-1752
Email: Archives2reference@nara.gov Count: Legal Archives Box, Standard 4.0 Copy 1 Media Information: Specific Media Type: Paper Container Id: Boxes 4904-4907 Container List: Container 4904: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4905: Tank Test Reports Blue Prints THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4906: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4907: Tank Test Reports: Blue Prints, Drawings THRU Tank Test Reports Interesting. Those ones, I haven't seen. Let me know what turns up
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
Phone: 301-837-3510
Fax: 301-837-1752
Email: Archives2reference@nara.gov Count: Legal Archives Box, Standard 4.0 Copy 1 Media Information: Specific Media Type: Paper Container Id: Boxes 4904-4907 Container List: Container 4904: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4905: Tank Test Reports Blue Prints THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4906: Tank Test Reports THRU Tank Test Reports Container 4907: Tank Test Reports: Blue Prints, Drawings THRU Tank Test Reports Interesting. Those ones, I haven't seen. Let me know what turns up
Lert
Okay I'm an Idiot
23.12.2014 01:42:01
Subject: Okay I'm an Idiot
Link on message: #8309044
Dicho, on Dec 22 2014 - 23:26, said: All this time I thought that the new Firefly tank was the actually
the Super Sherman. Image my disappointment when I logged in and
didn't see this: 
Link on message: #8309044
Dicho, on Dec 22 2014 - 23:26, said: All this time I thought that the new Firefly tank was the actually
the Super Sherman. Image my disappointment when I logged in and
didn't see this: Lert: That's not the super sherman, though. This is:
ElPozoleOlmeca
How to unblock account
23.12.2014 01:41:53
Subject: How to unblock account
Link on message: #8309043
Link on message: #8309043
ElPozoleOlmeca: Once you've paid your chargeback just send in a ticket with all the
information and let them know you just paid. Support will verify
and you will once again be back in the game.
Lert
i dident get my exchange
23.12.2014 01:38:45
Subject: i dident get my exchange
Link on message: #8309029
Link on message: #8309029
Lert: It's called credits. Also, make sure it wasn't World of Warplanes
credits, but actual WoT credits.
HBFT
Intelligence Data screen is ridiculously broken
23.12.2014 01:10:56
Subject: Intelligence Data screen is ridiculously broken
Link on message: #8308908
Link on message: #8308908
HBFT: I would like to apologize for the delay in getting back to everyone
as I had not heard information about progress made on this issue
until now. I have been told that a good number of issues that
were associated with this issue have been resolved with the release
of Update 9.5. If you have any new observations regarding
your ability to schedule Stronghold Raids, I'd love to hear them!
Lert
Questions about Firefly
23.12.2014 01:00:23
Subject: Questions about Firefly
Link on message: #8308855
Link on message: #8308855
Lert: The in-game Firefly: 
VS the Firefly I'm most familiar with from pictures:
Now,
the one in the photograph has a very different hull from the one in
the game. In fact, if you look at the in-game one, it looks like
they took a welded plate hull and welded the front-end of a cast
hull on it. You can see the diagonal weld line starting above and
behind the drive sprocket, above the first bogey. Now, my
questions are: - Is that what actually happened with the
Firefly WG scanned for the in-game model? I'd be very interested in
learning the history behind that particular firefly. - I was under
the impression that all (at least most) Fireflies had the hull as
depicted in the photograph; welded plate hull with protrustions for
the driver and co-driver. Were different hulls used for the
Firefly? - If so, what hulls? was it just a specific series of
Shermans that were converted to Firefly, or was it just a thrown
together collection of whatever Shermans they could get their hands
on? - Why does the in-game Firefly have an american M2 HMG on top?
Shouldn't it be a british .303 or something instead?
VS the Firefly I'm most familiar with from pictures:
Now,
the one in the photograph has a very different hull from the one in
the game. In fact, if you look at the in-game one, it looks like
they took a welded plate hull and welded the front-end of a cast
hull on it. You can see the diagonal weld line starting above and
behind the drive sprocket, above the first bogey. Now, my
questions are: - Is that what actually happened with the
Firefly WG scanned for the in-game model? I'd be very interested in
learning the history behind that particular firefly. - I was under
the impression that all (at least most) Fireflies had the hull as
depicted in the photograph; welded plate hull with protrustions for
the driver and co-driver. Were different hulls used for the
Firefly? - If so, what hulls? was it just a specific series of
Shermans that were converted to Firefly, or was it just a thrown
together collection of whatever Shermans they could get their hands
on? - Why does the in-game Firefly have an american M2 HMG on top?
Shouldn't it be a british .303 or something instead?KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 23:52:33
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8308531
slashngut21, on Dec 22 2014 - 13:41, said: (2) How about the fact that so many people have asked for better
(or some in the first place) customer support. We all know that cs
is horrible, but nothing is done about it. Part of this is our
fault for continually to pay wg for doing nothing.
Link on message: #8308531
slashngut21, on Dec 22 2014 - 13:41, said: (2) How about the fact that so many people have asked for better
(or some in the first place) customer support. We all know that cs
is horrible, but nothing is done about it. Part of this is our
fault for continually to pay wg for doing nothing.KMaus: If you feel like CS "is horrible" - try giving less vague
feedback about why you feel that way, so i can look into it for
you.
Saying "CS is horrible" is not actionable, nor does it tell me what about your experience, you feel is lacking, or what we can address to improve.
Saying "CS is horrible" is not actionable, nor does it tell me what about your experience, you feel is lacking, or what we can address to improve.
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 23:52:33
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8308531
slashngut21, on Dec 22 2014 - 13:41, said: (2) How about the fact that so many people have asked for better
(or some in the first place) customer support. We all know that cs
is horrible, but nothing is done about it. Part of this is our
fault for continually to pay wg for doing nothing.
Link on message: #8308531
slashngut21, on Dec 22 2014 - 13:41, said: (2) How about the fact that so many people have asked for better
(or some in the first place) customer support. We all know that cs
is horrible, but nothing is done about it. Part of this is our
fault for continually to pay wg for doing nothing.KMaus: If you feel like CS "is horrible" - try giving less vague
feedback about why you feel that way, so i can look into it for
you.
Saying "CS is horrible" is not actionable, nor does it tell me what about your experience, you feel is lacking, or what we can address to improve.
Saying "CS is horrible" is not actionable, nor does it tell me what about your experience, you feel is lacking, or what we can address to improve.
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 23:51:11
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8308518
Moguai, on Dec 22 2014 - 12:17, said: The only problem with the Rep system are those that don't have a
spine automatically think when someone Neg Reps them because they
don't agree with your view or opinion that you are "bullying" them.
Bullying wins the most overused term the last 15 years.
Link on message: #8308518
Moguai, on Dec 22 2014 - 12:17, said: The only problem with the Rep system are those that don't have a
spine automatically think when someone Neg Reps them because they
don't agree with your view or opinion that you are "bullying" them.
Bullying wins the most overused term the last 15 years.KMaus:
I suppose I'm not sure that I agree. I had at least 20 emails about this my first week - begging me to do away with the rep system because players feel bullied. Just because you dont feel bullied by it, doesn't mean that others don't. Clearly at least 25% (1 in 4 players) doesn't like the Rep system, per this poll. That 25% perspective is valid as well, even if they lost the poll.
I suppose I'm not sure that I agree. I had at least 20 emails about this my first week - begging me to do away with the rep system because players feel bullied. Just because you dont feel bullied by it, doesn't mean that others don't. Clearly at least 25% (1 in 4 players) doesn't like the Rep system, per this poll. That 25% perspective is valid as well, even if they lost the poll.
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 23:51:11
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8308518
Moguai, on Dec 22 2014 - 12:17, said: The only problem with the Rep system are those that don't have a
spine automatically think when someone Neg Reps them because they
don't agree with your view or opinion that you are "bullying" them.
Bullying wins the most overused term the last 15 years.
Link on message: #8308518
Moguai, on Dec 22 2014 - 12:17, said: The only problem with the Rep system are those that don't have a
spine automatically think when someone Neg Reps them because they
don't agree with your view or opinion that you are "bullying" them.
Bullying wins the most overused term the last 15 years.KMaus:
I suppose I'm not sure that I agree. I had at least 20 emails about this my first week - begging me to do away with the rep system because players feel bullied. Just because you dont feel bullied by it, doesn't mean that others don't. Clearly at least 25% (1 in 4 players) doesn't like the Rep system, per this poll. That 25% perspective is valid as well, even if they lost the poll.
I suppose I'm not sure that I agree. I had at least 20 emails about this my first week - begging me to do away with the rep system because players feel bullied. Just because you dont feel bullied by it, doesn't mean that others don't. Clearly at least 25% (1 in 4 players) doesn't like the Rep system, per this poll. That 25% perspective is valid as well, even if they lost the poll.
Lert
They did what?
22.12.2014 23:21:34
Pigeon_of_War
9.5 Issues and Reports
22.12.2014 23:07:39
Subject: 9.5 Issues and Reports
Link on message: #8308256
Infinitemoose, on Dec 22 2014 - 12:27, said: I am having the same problem. My client will not log
on. Have tried numerous work arounds but no luck.
Anyone have a clue as to why this would happen? And do you
have a viable solution?
Link on message: #8308256
Infinitemoose, on Dec 22 2014 - 12:27, said: I am having the same problem. My client will not log
on. Have tried numerous work arounds but no luck.
Anyone have a clue as to why this would happen? And do you
have a viable solution? Pigeon_of_War: I can confirm the servers are indeed working. Try
uninstalling any mods you may have. Worst case scenario, you
may need to send a ticket.
Lert
why is reload timer still not fixed?
22.12.2014 22:53:12
Subject: why is reload timer still not fixed?
Link on message: #8308170
Link on message: #8308170
Lert: So, what's broken about the reload timer? Mine works fine ...
Lert
question about in game tank accuracy
22.12.2014 22:30:30
Lert
Lert's honest Firefly review!
22.12.2014 22:25:11
Subject: Lert's honest Firefly review!
Link on message: #8308009
Fenxis, on Dec 22 2014 - 20:20, said: I don't think that's true on live...
Link on message: #8308009
Fenxis, on Dec 22 2014 - 20:20, said: I don't think that's true on live...Lert: Yes it is. My Firefly is 3.99s reload with 100% loader,
vents and rammer. When I drove BP I never got it below 4s.
Lert
Kv2 so damn slow
22.12.2014 22:12:14
Lert
Lert's honest Firefly review!
22.12.2014 22:10:46
Subject: Lert's honest Firefly review!
Link on message: #8307924
Dust_, on Dec 22 2014 - 19:32, said: So, basically, it fixes the only problem the E8 has. A crappy gun.
Jedi5150, on Dec 22 2014 - 19:48, said: I'm not sure how this news is not the shockingly great fortune
we've all been waiting for. Lert, you're making it sound like
no big deal. To me it sounds like they took an already
incredibly competitive tank and made it better in the one weak
area, penetration. How is that not the God-mode answer to our
tank dreams we've all been waiting for?
Link on message: #8307924
Dust_, on Dec 22 2014 - 19:32, said: So, basically, it fixes the only problem the E8 has. A crappy gun.Lert:
Jedi5150, on Dec 22 2014 - 19:48, said: I'm not sure how this news is not the shockingly great fortune
we've all been waiting for. Lert, you're making it sound like
no big deal. To me it sounds like they took an already
incredibly competitive tank and made it better in the one weak
area, penetration. How is that not the God-mode answer to our
tank dreams we've all been waiting for?Lert: It's much slower, though.
HBFT
Third Campaign: Overall Results Announced
22.12.2014 20:57:46
Subject: Third Campaign: Overall Results Announced
Link on message: #8307507
D00LZ, on Dec 22 2014 - 04:03, said: Hypnotic or other WG moderator, When will the medals be
updated in the Service Record? It still only says 'Special Medal...
Information on the medal is loading." This is still the case for
the previous campaign as well.
Edit: In regards to the camo, will there be an option similar to what the options are now for applying camo? Will we get to "preview" it on each tank we have before making a selection?
Link on message: #8307507
D00LZ, on Dec 22 2014 - 04:03, said: Hypnotic or other WG moderator, When will the medals be
updated in the Service Record? It still only says 'Special Medal...
Information on the medal is loading." This is still the case for
the previous campaign as well.Edit: In regards to the camo, will there be an option similar to what the options are now for applying camo? Will we get to "preview" it on each tank we have before making a selection?
HBFT: For more info on when campaign rewards will be credited to
player accounts, check out this
post. With regards to the campaign camouflage pattern,
we have received word that this special camouflage is nation
specific. As such, players will receive 7 camouflage patterns
such as: Camo - UK, Camo - USA, Camo - Japan, etc. You
should be able to apply this pattern to a single vehicle of your
choice from each nation's tech tree through the regular
"Exterior" interface for the Summer camouflage pattern.
Additionally, you will get to "preview" your camouflage just
like any other camouflage pattern before confirming application.
(Note: When previewing this pattern on your tanks, I would
be cautious about hitting "Accept" below when you select that
camouflage pattern because that will "confirm" your camouflage
pattern application)
HBFT
Campaign Reward tank.
22.12.2014 20:48:56
Subject: Campaign Reward tank.
Link on message: #8307470
DeltaVolt, on Dec 22 2014 - 10:27, said: Do you have a timeline of when they'll begin to credit
them and when they expect to finish doing so?
Link on message: #8307470
DeltaVolt, on Dec 22 2014 - 10:27, said: Do you have a timeline of when they'll begin to credit
them and when they expect to finish doing so?HBFT: Unfortunately, I do not have that information available to
me at this time. That having been said, that will not stop me
from poking around to try and find more details, but until I know
more I do not want to imply that I have more information than
I already have.
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 20:43:33
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8307444
Iron_Soul_Stealer, on Dec 19 2014 - 16:32, said: ^...Dude, I agree. And I know this may sound strange, but
somehow, I think that's exactly what they want to
happen...seriously... *Create even more conflict here, because it's
better for business that way... *it keeps people in the game/forum,
and keeps them fighting with each other {clan rivalry etc.}...makes
perfect sense from an extremely unethical business standpoint.
*Oh, and before I forget...have a look at this... I actually
sent in a support ticket to Wargaming regarding my serious concerns
about this whole ridiculous rep/voting thing, and how unhealthy
their system was. Their official response was this: "The
reputation system is just a 'for-fun' system, and the majority of
our forum members don't take it seriously, anyway. We
recommend that you just ignore the votes if they bother you..." end
quote ^ nice response...huh..? 
^...I see this guy has
his priorities straight... *if Wargaming.net moves ahead with
this absolutely ridiculous new forum system {as I'm sure they
will}...you will all be seeing a whole lot more of my real clan, as
they are some of my biggest supporters, here, and IRL.
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/403832-veritas-scientia-sapientia/page__pid__8178177#entry8178177
So, wulfie, it's probably better that you hear this now, and
directly from me, because you'll be finding out soon enough....and
as WG suggests, don't take this seriously, but my clan finds many
of your posts very insulting, disrespectful, and
inappropriate....among other things. But hey, like Wargaming said,
it's just a 'for-fun' system anyway...besides, there's more
important things in life, just ignore the rep if it bothers you
that much. -Iron_Soul_Stealer
Link on message: #8307444
Iron_Soul_Stealer, on Dec 19 2014 - 16:32, said: ^...Dude, I agree. And I know this may sound strange, but
somehow, I think that's exactly what they want to
happen...seriously... *Create even more conflict here, because it's
better for business that way... *it keeps people in the game/forum,
and keeps them fighting with each other {clan rivalry etc.}...makes
perfect sense from an extremely unethical business standpoint.
*Oh, and before I forget...have a look at this... I actually
sent in a support ticket to Wargaming regarding my serious concerns
about this whole ridiculous rep/voting thing, and how unhealthy
their system was. Their official response was this: "The
reputation system is just a 'for-fun' system, and the majority of
our forum members don't take it seriously, anyway. We
recommend that you just ignore the votes if they bother you..." end
quote ^ nice response...huh..? ^...I see this guy has
his priorities straight... *if Wargaming.net moves ahead with
this absolutely ridiculous new forum system {as I'm sure they
will}...you will all be seeing a whole lot more of my real clan, as
they are some of my biggest supporters, here, and IRL.
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/403832-veritas-scientia-sapientia/page__pid__8178177#entry8178177
So, wulfie, it's probably better that you hear this now, and
directly from me, because you'll be finding out soon enough....and
as WG suggests, don't take this seriously, but my clan finds many
of your posts very insulting, disrespectful, and
inappropriate....among other things. But hey, like Wargaming said,
it's just a 'for-fun' system anyway...besides, there's more
important things in life, just ignore the rep if it bothers you
that much. -Iron_Soul_StealerKMaus: 1.) on a personal note, as a player, i agree with you. I
don't even want the rep system. I voted against it. As a player, i
think players bully each other with it, and if it were up to me,
i'd just take the proverbial nerf guns away, so that there's less
ways to punk each other in the forums. i hate that new players dont
feel comfortable coming to the forums because they get yelled at
for asking questions in the NEW PLAYER SECTION by other players who
are established. The purpose of a community is shared interest and
experience - fellowship. It should feel safe here for everyone.
#imo 2.) I am however, also representing WG - and one thing I want
us to do as WG, that we're trying to learn to do better - is to
ask, poll, and represent what you want. Sometimes this goes against
my preferences as a player, but that's the job. In this scenario,
Krista the player, thinks that showing the rep system is an awful
idea. But enough players asked for it, that KMaus (of WG) wanted to
look into it. Part of my job is representing Wargaming, but part of
it is representing you and your wants as players - regardless of
whether they align with my personal agendas (ie: hating the rep
system). There are millions of us, playing this game, and having
very different opinions on pretty much everything. I'm trying to
understand as many of the pieces as possible.
3.) This functionality is currently restricted and for now, only staff / mods has access to this. I'm not sure if it will change in the future, but we want to know if you guys have a strong preference either way so that we keep that in mind.
I understand you seem to feel strongly about it, and i share many of your sentiments on a personal level. solidarity.
3.) This functionality is currently restricted and for now, only staff / mods has access to this. I'm not sure if it will change in the future, but we want to know if you guys have a strong preference either way so that we keep that in mind.
I understand you seem to feel strongly about it, and i share many of your sentiments on a personal level. solidarity.
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 20:43:33
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8307444
Iron_Soul_Stealer, on Dec 19 2014 - 16:32, said: ^...Dude, I agree. And I know this may sound strange, but
somehow, I think that's exactly what they want to
happen...seriously... *Create even more conflict here, because it's
better for business that way... *it keeps people in the game/forum,
and keeps them fighting with each other {clan rivalry etc.}...makes
perfect sense from an extremely unethical business standpoint.
*Oh, and before I forget...have a look at this... I actually
sent in a support ticket to Wargaming regarding my serious concerns
about this whole ridiculous rep/voting thing, and how unhealthy
their system was. Their official response was this: "The
reputation system is just a 'for-fun' system, and the majority of
our forum members don't take it seriously, anyway. We
recommend that you just ignore the votes if they bother you..." end
quote ^ nice response...huh..? ^...I see this guy has
his priorities straight... *if Wargaming.net moves ahead with
this absolutely ridiculous new forum system {as I'm sure they
will}...you will all be seeing a whole lot more of my real clan, as
they are some of my biggest supporters, here, and IRL. http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/403832-veritas-scientia-sapientia/page__pid__8178177#entry8178177
So, wulfie, it's probably better that you hear this now, and
directly from me, because you'll be finding out soon enough....and
as WG suggests, don't take this seriously, but my clan finds many
of your posts very insulting, disrespectful, and
inappropriate....among other things. But hey, like Wargaming said,
it's just a 'for-fun' system anyway...besides, there's more
important things in life, just ignore the rep if it bothers you
that much. -Iron_Soul_Stealer
Link on message: #8307444
Iron_Soul_Stealer, on Dec 19 2014 - 16:32, said: ^...Dude, I agree. And I know this may sound strange, but
somehow, I think that's exactly what they want to
happen...seriously... *Create even more conflict here, because it's
better for business that way... *it keeps people in the game/forum,
and keeps them fighting with each other {clan rivalry etc.}...makes
perfect sense from an extremely unethical business standpoint.
*Oh, and before I forget...have a look at this... I actually
sent in a support ticket to Wargaming regarding my serious concerns
about this whole ridiculous rep/voting thing, and how unhealthy
their system was. Their official response was this: "The
reputation system is just a 'for-fun' system, and the majority of
our forum members don't take it seriously, anyway. We
recommend that you just ignore the votes if they bother you..." end
quote ^ nice response...huh..? ^...I see this guy has
his priorities straight... *if Wargaming.net moves ahead with
this absolutely ridiculous new forum system {as I'm sure they
will}...you will all be seeing a whole lot more of my real clan, as
they are some of my biggest supporters, here, and IRL. http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/403832-veritas-scientia-sapientia/page__pid__8178177#entry8178177
So, wulfie, it's probably better that you hear this now, and
directly from me, because you'll be finding out soon enough....and
as WG suggests, don't take this seriously, but my clan finds many
of your posts very insulting, disrespectful, and
inappropriate....among other things. But hey, like Wargaming said,
it's just a 'for-fun' system anyway...besides, there's more
important things in life, just ignore the rep if it bothers you
that much. -Iron_Soul_StealerKMaus: 1.) on a personal note, as a player, i agree with you. I
don't even want the rep system. I voted against it. As a player, i
think players bully each other with it, and if it were up to me,
i'd just take the proverbial nerf guns away, so that there's less
ways to punk each other in the forums. i hate that new players dont
feel comfortable coming to the forums because they get yelled at
for asking questions in the NEW PLAYER SECTION by other players who
are established. The purpose of a community is shared interest and
experience - fellowship. It should feel safe here for everyone.
#imo 2.) I am however, also representing WG - and one thing I want
us to do as WG, that we're trying to learn to do better - is to
ask, poll, and represent what you want. Sometimes this goes against
my preferences as a player, but that's the job. In this scenario,
Krista the player, thinks that showing the rep system is an awful
idea. But enough players asked for it, that KMaus (of WG) wanted to
look into it. Part of my job is representing Wargaming, but part of
it is representing you and your wants as players - regardless of
whether they align with my personal agendas (ie: hating the rep
system). There are millions of us, playing this game, and having
very different opinions on pretty much everything. I'm trying to
understand as many of the pieces as possible.
3.) This functionality is currently restricted and for now, only staff / mods has access to this. I'm not sure if it will change in the future, but we want to know if you guys have a strong preference either way so that we keep that in mind.
I understand you seem to feel strongly about it, and i share many of your sentiments on a personal level. solidarity.
3.) This functionality is currently restricted and for now, only staff / mods has access to this. I'm not sure if it will change in the future, but we want to know if you guys have a strong preference either way so that we keep that in mind.
I understand you seem to feel strongly about it, and i share many of your sentiments on a personal level. solidarity.
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 20:34:47
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8307398
Link on message: #8307398
KMaus: Hey tankers,
Thanks for your patience! Per your voting, (again, about 71% majority) the reputation system will be staying in place, at this time.
The reputation system will not be made visible at this time, but we will keep this suggestion in mind, and appreciate you letting us know what you want from this system.
Thanks for polling and happy holidays!
Thanks for your patience! Per your voting, (again, about 71% majority) the reputation system will be staying in place, at this time.
The reputation system will not be made visible at this time, but we will keep this suggestion in mind, and appreciate you letting us know what you want from this system.
Thanks for polling and happy holidays!
KMaus
Reputation System: Stay or Go?
22.12.2014 20:34:47
Subject: Reputation System: Stay or Go?
Link on message: #8307398
Link on message: #8307398
KMaus: Hey tankers,
Thanks for your patience! Per your voting, (again, about 71% majority) the reputation system will be staying in place, at this time.
The reputation system will not be made visible at this time, but we will keep this suggestion in mind, and appreciate you letting us know what you want from this system.
Thanks for polling and happy holidays!
Thanks for your patience! Per your voting, (again, about 71% majority) the reputation system will be staying in place, at this time.
The reputation system will not be made visible at this time, but we will keep this suggestion in mind, and appreciate you letting us know what you want from this system.
Thanks for polling and happy holidays!
Pigeon_of_War
9.5 Issues and Reports
22.12.2014 20:28:03
Subject: 9.5 Issues and Reports
Link on message: #8307364
razzi123, on Dec 22 2014 - 09:54, said: I see there is already an issue...>w>*reads title* i
didnt know 9.4=9.5.....
Link on message: #8307364
razzi123, on Dec 22 2014 - 09:54, said: I see there is already an issue...>w>*reads title* i
didnt know 9.4=9.5.....Pigeon_of_War: Simple fix, it says 9.5 now. 
Реклама | Adv