Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Here's a Feedback for you
Link on message: #8314403
Link on message: #8314403
Lert: Of all the things to whine about, he's whining about spending an
additional 1.5 seconds to click another button. Oh wow, some
people. You know, you could stand to remain in battle a
while longer and learn from watching other people.
Subject: Spotting
Link on message: #8314372
RavenousSix, on Dec 23 2014 - 22:41, said: Not everyone has 20ms ping to the Wargaming servers and no packet
loss.
Link on message: #8314372
RavenousSix, on Dec 23 2014 - 22:41, said: Not everyone has 20ms ping to the Wargaming servers and no packet
loss.Lert: Like me. 120 minimum, the PL light flashing red 40% of the
time, yet I still haven't seen it happen. Ever. If it
happens as often as you claim, providing a replay of it happening
shouldn't be a problem, right?
Subject: Spotting
Link on message: #8314325
PeterAn, on Dec 23 2014 - 21:39, said: have you ever had an E100 disappear in the field right in front of
you (100-200 meters)?
RavenousSix, on Dec 23 2014 - 22:36, said: I have IS-4's and E-100's disappearing right in front of me
in the open and not behind bushes or rocks or houses. I have
brothers and I run optics. My view-range is 455. Yet they disappear
right in the open (closer than 150 meters).
Link on message: #8314325
PeterAn, on Dec 23 2014 - 21:39, said: have you ever had an E100 disappear in the field right in front of
you (100-200 meters)?Lert:
RavenousSix, on Dec 23 2014 - 22:36, said: I have IS-4's and E-100's disappearing right in front of me
in the open and not behind bushes or rocks or houses. I have
brothers and I run optics. My view-range is 455. Yet they disappear
right in the open (closer than 150 meters).Lert: And yet, nobody ever posts a replay with that happening the
way they describe it. 200 meters, in the open, an E100
disappearing. I'd love to see that some time, because in 45k games
between beta and live I never have.
Subject: Question regarding campaign camo
Link on message: #8314215
Hammaneggs, on Dec 23 2014 - 22:10, said: I think if you sell a tank with the camo and rebuy it, you get the
camo again.
Link on message: #8314215
Hammaneggs, on Dec 23 2014 - 22:10, said: I think if you sell a tank with the camo and rebuy it, you get the
camo again.Lert: Permanent camo, yes. But if you put this permanent CW reward
on a tank, it's unavailable for other tanks in that nation.
Subject: Question regarding campaign camo
Link on message: #8314212
Kickballz410, on Dec 23 2014 - 13:54, said: I tried looking up for answers but it seems like this hasn't been
covered yet. The question is how many campaign special camos do you
have? What is the max tanks that can have this special camo? So far
I was able to put it on all 3 campain tier 10 tanks: vk 7201, m60,
and 907. I think it is seven because when I received
the 907 and the special camo, the camo messages appeared 7
times. And another question is, once you put it on the
tank, is it permanent? Can you transfer this special camo around
other tanks? If you want to change the special camo to regular,
will it get destroyed? How does it all work yo?
Link on message: #8314212
Kickballz410, on Dec 23 2014 - 13:54, said: I tried looking up for answers but it seems like this hasn't been
covered yet. The question is how many campaign special camos do you
have? What is the max tanks that can have this special camo? So far
I was able to put it on all 3 campain tier 10 tanks: vk 7201, m60,
and 907. I think it is seven because when I received
the 907 and the special camo, the camo messages appeared 7
times. And another question is, once you put it on the
tank, is it permanent? Can you transfer this special camo around
other tanks? If you want to change the special camo to regular,
will it get destroyed? How does it all work yo?HBFT: There are seven camouflage patterns, one for each nation.
Each camouflage pattern is applicable to a single vehicle
from each nation. So, in theory, you can have 7 tanks total
(one from each nation) with the special camouflage on it.
With regards to the behavior of the camouflage pattern, I believe
this question was answered over
here.
Subject: Question regarding campaign camo
Link on message: #8314108
Link on message: #8314108
Lert: One camo application per nation, one time use per camo.
Subject: KV-2 Question
Link on message: #8314050
charcoal59, on Dec 23 2014 - 21:53, said: Lert, that's impressive, how'd you get so much speed up on
that thing?
Link on message: #8314050
charcoal59, on Dec 23 2014 - 21:53, said: Lert, that's impressive, how'd you get so much speed up on
that thing?Lert: Good crew, mostly. Which, come to think of it, really
makes or breaks KV-2. Having a good crew makes all the difference.
Subject: Spotting
Link on message: #8313878
Link on message: #8313878
Lert: This is not a simulator. This is an arcade game. Clunky as the
spotting system is, it's fair - people with slow computers aren't
handicapped and people with amazing setups don't get a huge
advantage; there is no wallhacking, it's fair. You can't
handle the spotting system? Go play something else.
Subject: KV-2 Question
Link on message: #8313871
Link on message: #8313871
Lert: KV-2 is nothing like other tanks. It's all about that gun. It's all
about peeking out, derping something in the face and having a place
you can duck in to to reload - preferably while the tank you just
pissed off is being distracted by your team. It's all about knowing
when and where to shoot. You can't approach KV-2 like any other
tank. This
is one of the several ace badges I've collected in it. I've since
collected two MoE's in it. You might get a sense of the playstyle
from that.
Subject: 3rd campaign reward Camouflage questions
Link on message: #8313760
Link on message: #8313760
Lert: It seems to be for a single tank per nation, no more.
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8313694
shapeshifter, on Dec 23 2014 - 20:06, said: G series as far as I know, M4 and M4A1 is ORD 9 SNL G-104
for example. What I wonder is what is the ORD numbering
for.
Like say you knew the G number but not whatever the ORD would be Box 3569: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-139 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-226 Box 3588: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 9 SNL G-102 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 9 SNL G-225 So say you wanted G-144, do you want ORD 7 G-144 or ORD 9 G-144 whats the diff?
Link on message: #8313694
shapeshifter, on Dec 23 2014 - 20:06, said: G series as far as I know, M4 and M4A1 is ORD 9 SNL G-104
for example. What I wonder is what is the ORD numbering
for.Like say you knew the G number but not whatever the ORD would be Box 3569: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-139 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-226 Box 3588: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 9 SNL G-102 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 9 SNL G-225 So say you wanted G-144, do you want ORD 7 G-144 or ORD 9 G-144 whats the diff?
The_Chieftain: I'm pretty sure armored vehicles are in the 400s in
the decimal system, Maybe 405? I'm not sure what those G-numbers
are, I've not encountered them before. Unfortunately, every branch
and subdepartment seems to have had their own numbering system.
Subject: Holiday Contest Winners ETA
Link on message: #8313603
Link on message: #8313603
pizzastorm: EDIT - Prize winners will be announced on 12/30!
Hello everybody, We are asking for a bit of your patience!
We will be out of the office for Christmas until next Monday. We
will then furiously work to gather all the entries and reward some
prizes! (I'll make sure to add a few more winners for the extended
wait) Thanks for your understanding! Have a
happy and safe week/weekend!
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8313440
shapeshifter, on Dec 23 2014 - 19:22, said: Hey Chief, would this be the series that would contain all of the
SNL part list books? Central Decimal Correspondence Files,
1940 - 1945 http://research.arch...cription/895294 examples
Box 3565: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 5 SNL A-35 to 461 ASF
Catalog (ORD) 6 SNL N-621 Box 3566: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 to 461
ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL C-21 Box 3567: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL
C-26 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 E-20 Box 3568: 461 ASF Catalog
(ORD) 7 SNL E-53 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-138 Box 3569: 461
ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-139 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-226
Box 3570: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-229 to 461 ASF Catalog
(ORD) 7-8 SNL G-690 trying to wrap my head around reading it
to ask what box I want something from.
Link on message: #8313440
shapeshifter, on Dec 23 2014 - 19:22, said: Hey Chief, would this be the series that would contain all of the
SNL part list books? Central Decimal Correspondence Files,
1940 - 1945 http://research.arch...cription/895294 examples
Box 3565: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 5 SNL A-35 to 461 ASF
Catalog (ORD) 6 SNL N-621 Box 3566: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 to 461
ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL C-21 Box 3567: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL
C-26 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 E-20 Box 3568: 461 ASF Catalog
(ORD) 7 SNL E-53 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-138 Box 3569: 461
ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-139 to 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-226
Box 3570: 461 ASF Catalog (ORD) 7 SNL G-229 to 461 ASF Catalog
(ORD) 7-8 SNL G-690 trying to wrap my head around reading it
to ask what box I want something from.The_Chieftain: Ah, crap. I can't remember what the decimel system is for
armored vehicles.
Subject: Stand to 3 way draw who won?
Link on message: #8313429
James_Josh, on Dec 23 2014 - 11:40, said: Does this mean half-way split or Full Gold Payout to Each
Respective Team. AND is there still a 2nd Place payout in this
case? My Team tied for first in 1 of the rounds with 1 other team
and BOTH teams got the 500 Gold. So that is what I expected when We
came in second with 2 teams tied for 1st on Friday And Sunday. But
have yet to Receive payout for the Second Place Victories. If WG
isn't going to payout 2nd place in these cases then the Teams tied
for first should get split that gold as well. http://worldoftanks....nd_To_12.19.14/
Link on message: #8313429
James_Josh, on Dec 23 2014 - 11:40, said: Does this mean half-way split or Full Gold Payout to Each
Respective Team. AND is there still a 2nd Place payout in this
case? My Team tied for first in 1 of the rounds with 1 other team
and BOTH teams got the 500 Gold. So that is what I expected when We
came in second with 2 teams tied for 1st on Friday And Sunday. But
have yet to Receive payout for the Second Place Victories. If WG
isn't going to payout 2nd place in these cases then the Teams tied
for first should get split that gold as well. http://worldoftanks....nd_To_12.19.14/
dance210: The teams are tied in points, but not according to the draw
rules. Cabra defeated Corrupted Tankerz in the head-to-head
draw rule. That makes Cabra the first place winner, with second
place going to Corrupted Tankerz.
Subject: Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: IS-7 Part 2
Link on message: #8313346
Reppic27, on Dec 23 2014 - 19:33, said: Ninja'd by WG themselves....
Link on message: #8313346
Reppic27, on Dec 23 2014 - 19:33, said: Ninja'd by WG themselves....Lert: 

Subject: Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: IS-7
Link on message: #8313331
Link on message: #8313331
Content_WG: Check out the video and see what it's like inside the Soviet
IS-7!
Full news text
Full news text
Subject: Springtime for T110 and the Americas
Link on message: #8313144
Daigensui, on Dec 23 2014 - 18:38, said: So every suspicion I had about about the supposed
"cutting edge" technology of IS-7 seems to have been confirmed.
It's not as magical as some people think it was. Feels nice to know
I was right all along. Now, if only we knew more about the
supposed hunter-killer system..... too bad they seemed to have took
out the related equipment.
Link on message: #8313144
Daigensui, on Dec 23 2014 - 18:38, said: So every suspicion I had about about the supposed
"cutting edge" technology of IS-7 seems to have been confirmed.
It's not as magical as some people think it was. Feels nice to know
I was right all along. Now, if only we knew more about the
supposed hunter-killer system..... too bad they seemed to have took
out the related equipment.The_Chieftain: I really don't recall seeing anything which may have been
related to it, neither do I see how it could have been installed on
that tank. Possible it was tried on an earlier one, much like the
remote 14.5mm.
Subject: Can someone please help me with tank inspector for the obj.907 please.
Link on message: #8313132
Link on message: #8313132
Lert: Confirmed. My HE shells went straight through the boxes on my clan
buddy's 907 without detonating.
Subject: Can someone please help me with tank inspector for the obj.907 please.
Link on message: #8313099
Link on message: #8313099
Lert: Getting a clan buddy into a training room.
Subject: Stand-To Week of Dec. 15th
Link on message: #8313079
James_Josh, on Dec 23 2014 - 09:02, said: My Team STILL has not Received Our Gold payout From Second
Place on Friday, and Second place on Sunday. Why???? Teams
Captain-- Running On Empty
Link on message: #8313079
James_Josh, on Dec 23 2014 - 09:02, said: My Team STILL has not Received Our Gold payout From Second
Place on Friday, and Second place on Sunday. Why???? Teams
Captain-- Running On Emptydance210: Because, even for Stand-To's, it can take up to 7 days after
the end of the tournament to get gold. It may be even longer, as
there is a holiday break this week. Please continue to be
patient, and your gold will be delivered ASAP 
Subject: Can someone please help me with tank inspector for the obj.907 please.
Link on message: #8313066
Link on message: #8313066
Lert: The stowage boxes are not counted as armor, AFAIK.
Subject: Lert's honest Firefly review!
Link on message: #8313062
120mm_he, on Dec 23 2014 - 17:42, said: The didn't have to crap out the gun handling as badly as
they did
Link on message: #8313062
120mm_he, on Dec 23 2014 - 17:42, said: The didn't have to crap out the gun handling as badly as
they didLert: So ... It's a tier 6 medium with the same gun the heavy line
doesn't get until tier 7, and you expected them not to give it poor
gun handling? As is, the gun handles far better than I had expected
it would.
Subject: T57 whoas
Link on message: #8312873
WarriorOsprey, on Dec 23 2014 - 17:13, said: http://www.washingto...n-ballots-cast/
Voter ID laws, spending millions of dollars to stop
something less common than winning the lottery.
Link on message: #8312873
WarriorOsprey, on Dec 23 2014 - 17:13, said: http://www.washingto...n-ballots-cast/
Voter ID laws, spending millions of dollars to stop
something less common than winning the lottery.The_Chieftain: The problem with those sorts of surveys is that identifying
the frauds in question to analyse in the first place is pretty much
impossible. There is absolutely no way, none, whatsover, to prove,
for example, that I didn't vote in my dad's place because I knew he
was out of town on a business trip, unless I raise my hand and say
"I did it." That's rather the point of the law and how Mr Levitt
deals with this problem in his analysis is not stated.
Subject: Lert's honest Firefly review!
Link on message: #8312817
PolkCorp, on Dec 22 2014 - 22:18, said: Isn't that why the Brits developed it... to have a Sherman with
more pen? 
ledhed14, on Dec 22 2014 - 21:08, said: It was UK answer to Panther and Tiger . One allotment to each Tank
platoon , its dedicated Tank Destroyer . Unlike US with dedicated
TD battalions this made much more sense and worked very well .
Because of this many US tankers died as the US military UNLIKE with
the air force , didn't copy the effort despite its potential
because "they" didn't think of it therefor it couldnt be very
good.. ..Army with its stupidity on tanks such as not rushing
Pershings into service ( NOT PATTON' S DECISION ) And the US Navy
insisting their torpedo worked , thus killing many members of the
Navy and Air service . Same with decision not to use 20 mm
cannon and many many more . Canadians did very well with this
Hybrid of a Sherman with an actual Gun that would work in the field
against realistic tanks . Many were up-armored with applique up to
limits of the suspension . I would love to read a book
written by British on these tanks , google is not very helpful.
agamemnon_b5, on Dec 23 2014 - 13:06, said: 1) not true. There was experienced gain by the
fighting in North Africa, Sicily and Italy. The Sherman was
barely adequate against the Panzer IV and inadequate against the
Panther and Tiger. The General I command of the Armor Branch
(for procurement and tactics and what not) refused a large scale
change in tactics and equipment (not to mention completely ignoring
British experience even though they had been fighting the Germans
much longer). 2) Also not true. The Wolverine and
Hellcat were well in service by D-Day, so the logistical chain for
76mm ammunition was already there. APCBC ammo wasn't the
problem, it was the shortage of HVAP ammo with tungsten cores that
was the issue. 4) Ports had nothing to do with the Pershing
(hell, the British were offloading Churchills on the beachhead).
The thing just wasn't ready yet since it had a low priority.
5) that has nothing to do with the fact that a tank with a
90mm gun anti-tank gun, fR better than the majority Sherman's with
75mm howitzers, was not given priority until Eisenhower had to step
in. 6) And yet the Americans were able to introduce the M36
in that timespan. You "Logistically unsupportable" argument
makes no sense.
120mm_he, on Dec 23 2014 - 17:36, said: It's workable but its basically a bastardized achilles which
actually has the hull soft stat performance to leverage the 17pdr
to best effect. Wg trolled us hard on this one.
Link on message: #8312817
PolkCorp, on Dec 22 2014 - 22:18, said: Isn't that why the Brits developed it... to have a Sherman with
more pen? The_Chieftain: Sortof. It was more important to them that they used an
ammunition type which was in service elsewhere in the entire
British Army. With the exception of a few 76mm Shermans they
accepted pretty much out of desperation and sent to Italy, nothing
else in the British Army used that round. Putting a British
hole-puncher into the tank made more sense than accepting the
American one.
ledhed14, on Dec 22 2014 - 21:08, said: It was UK answer to Panther and Tiger . One allotment to each Tank
platoon , its dedicated Tank Destroyer . Unlike US with dedicated
TD battalions this made much more sense and worked very well .
Because of this many US tankers died as the US military UNLIKE with
the air force , didn't copy the effort despite its potential
because "they" didn't think of it therefor it couldnt be very
good.. ..Army with its stupidity on tanks such as not rushing
Pershings into service ( NOT PATTON' S DECISION ) And the US Navy
insisting their torpedo worked , thus killing many members of the
Navy and Air service . Same with decision not to use 20 mm
cannon and many many more . Canadians did very well with this
Hybrid of a Sherman with an actual Gun that would work in the field
against realistic tanks . Many were up-armored with applique up to
limits of the suspension . I would love to read a book
written by British on these tanks , google is not very helpful.The_Chieftain:
agamemnon_b5, on Dec 23 2014 - 13:06, said: 1) not true. There was experienced gain by the
fighting in North Africa, Sicily and Italy. The Sherman was
barely adequate against the Panzer IV and inadequate against the
Panther and Tiger. The General I command of the Armor Branch
(for procurement and tactics and what not) refused a large scale
change in tactics and equipment (not to mention completely ignoring
British experience even though they had been fighting the Germans
much longer). 2) Also not true. The Wolverine and
Hellcat were well in service by D-Day, so the logistical chain for
76mm ammunition was already there. APCBC ammo wasn't the
problem, it was the shortage of HVAP ammo with tungsten cores that
was the issue. 4) Ports had nothing to do with the Pershing
(hell, the British were offloading Churchills on the beachhead).
The thing just wasn't ready yet since it had a low priority.
5) that has nothing to do with the fact that a tank with a
90mm gun anti-tank gun, fR better than the majority Sherman's with
75mm howitzers, was not given priority until Eisenhower had to step
in. 6) And yet the Americans were able to introduce the M36
in that timespan. You "Logistically unsupportable" argument
makes no sense.The_Chieftain: Before I respond to these two posts, might I inquire as to
if you have read the
one,
two,
three Pershing articles assessing its development timeline, and
the
one quoting Devers' (The General I command of the
Armor Branch (for procurement and tactics and what
not) approval of the 76mm in 1942?
120mm_he, on Dec 23 2014 - 17:36, said: It's workable but its basically a bastardized achilles which
actually has the hull soft stat performance to leverage the 17pdr
to best effect. Wg trolled us hard on this one.The_Chieftain: What were you expecting?
Subject: Third Campaign: Overall Results Announced
Link on message: #8312792
Asassian7, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:42, said: that's actually pretty amazing. if we sell the tank, or, say
put another camo on it, will the reward camo still be in the depot
for that tank like regular camo's are now?
Link on message: #8312792
Asassian7, on Dec 22 2014 - 17:42, said: that's actually pretty amazing. if we sell the tank, or, say
put another camo on it, will the reward camo still be in the depot
for that tank like regular camo's are now?HBFT: The Clan Camouflage pattern works like a regular camouflage
pattern. If you apply it to a vehicle and buy another camouflage
pattern, then you can swap back and forth between camouflage
patterns. If you sell the vehicle and buy it back again, then
the camouflage pattern is still associated with that tank.
You should be able to select it again on that tank as well.
Subject: World of Critical Hit
Link on message: #8312662
AMSRocker, on Dec 23 2014 - 07:42, said: I don't give a rat's behind on how many ways you tell it to
me...... When you hit a tank and make a "critical hit" you have
done damage even if it is minimal! They NEED to fix this!
Link on message: #8312662
AMSRocker, on Dec 23 2014 - 07:42, said: I don't give a rat's behind on how many ways you tell it to
me...... When you hit a tank and make a "critical hit" you have
done damage even if it is minimal! They NEED to fix this! The_Chieftain: I suspect much comes from your background. For over ten
years, WG primarily focused on military wargames. In such games,
damage which causes critical hits but no overall loss of integrity
are not uncommon. For example, if you play Harpoon4 (a very
hardcore naval wargame), you will be familiar with the fact that
you can do over a dozen critical hits with one shot without doing a
single hit point of damage. If you come from an online
background, such as WoW, LoL or a number of FPSs, this will be
rather unfamiliar to you. That doesn't make the critical hit system
wrong, just a different way of doing things.
Subject: Campaign Reward tank.
Link on message: #8312644
Link on message: #8312644
HBFT: As many of you are already aware, account crediting of 3rd Campaign
rewards has begun as of this morning. This process is going
to be a paced one to ensure the successful delivery of all tanks,
special medals, camo, etc. I have been informed that we hope
to complete this procedure before Christmas. Thank you again
for your patience and enjoy your rewards! 
Subject: T1 Cunningham be pimpin'
Link on message: #8312614
Happy_Moose, on Dec 23 2014 - 08:56, said:
awwwwww yea lel someone didnt
understand that CW camo kekekek
Link on message: #8312614
Happy_Moose, on Dec 23 2014 - 08:56, said:
awwwwww yea lel someone didnt
understand that CW camo kekekek HBFT: The 3rd Campaign camo completes the look! xD
Subject: My Object 907 Code came in the mail finally! (pics included!)
Link on message: #8312534
M4A3E8sherman, on Dec 23 2014 - 16:44, said: All this talk of 907s. Nobody wants an M60 code?
Link on message: #8312534
M4A3E8sherman, on Dec 23 2014 - 16:44, said: All this talk of 907s. Nobody wants an M60 code?Lert: I'd trade your M60 code for my second 907 code but I already
gave that away, sorry.
Subject: 3rd campaign reward Camouflage questions
Link on message: #8312524
Link on message: #8312524
Lert: 1) It means that its duration is unlimited, and you can apply it at
any time. 2) Just to draw attention to the fact that that is the
special reward camo. 3) You got 7 camo's. One for each nation. You
can use each camo once, so choose carefully.
Subject: Lert's honest Firefly review!
Link on message: #8312426
Link on message: #8312426
Lert: 3.98s reload on mine, with the top 17 pdr. BiA would shave a bit
more off of that, as would food.
Subject: My Object 907 Code came in the mail finally! (pics included!)
Link on message: #8312230
chloroform_date, on Dec 23 2014 - 16:00, said: Lert I should thank you for your guides. Helped my friend out alot

Link on message: #8312230
chloroform_date, on Dec 23 2014 - 16:00, said: Lert I should thank you for your guides. Helped my friend out alot
Lert: You're very welcome.
I wanted to respond with
another gif but I didn't have a gif for this.
Subject: My Object 907 Code came in the mail finally! (pics included!)
Link on message: #8312192
chloroform_date, on Dec 23 2014 - 15:55, said: Lert....is someone jealous?????
Link on message: #8312192
chloroform_date, on Dec 23 2014 - 15:55, said: Lert....is someone jealous?????Lert: 

Subject: My Object 907 Code came in the mail finally! (pics included!)
Link on message: #8312152
chloroform_date, on Dec 23 2014 - 15:48, said: CG we should totally go out on a date
ill use my special chloroform for you
Link on message: #8312152
chloroform_date, on Dec 23 2014 - 15:48, said: CG we should totally go out on a date Lert: 

Subject: All you impatient folk can stop being impatient now, your tank is here
Link on message: #8312065
Battlecruiser, on Dec 23 2014 - 15:16, said: Now why would somebody so readily suggest something that is
against the eula unless its something they break on a regular basis
and get away with?
Link on message: #8312065
Battlecruiser, on Dec 23 2014 - 15:16, said: Now why would somebody so readily suggest something that is
against the eula unless its something they break on a regular basis
and get away with?Lert: You caught me. I regularly sell my account. I confess.
Subject: Video: Wargaming Holiday Adventure
Link on message: #8312027
Link on message: #8312027
Content_WG: Check out this Wargaming holiday video about tanks, warplanes and
warships!
Full news text
Full news text
Subject: My Object 907 Code came in the mail finally! (pics included!)
Link on message: #8311970
Link on message: #8311970
Lert: Can confirm. I gave my second code to a friend who wishes to remain
anonymous. It's her first T10.
Реклама | Adv















