Developers posts on forum

TeriyakiTanker: Jesus, you have a 44% win rate, you are one of the pathetic losers ruining the game for everyone else.  The best thing they could do for this game is limit anyone with less than a 47% win rate to Tier III.  

Draschel:  Did your commander yell out,  ''ricochet?'' Or ''we just dinged them'' or was it ''we didn't penetrate their armor''  ''that one didn't go through''How about the visuals, did you see a grey flash with      X screen not penetrated X  I agree, FV193 could use some new help.  +buff side hull to 102 like super conquer so it can side scrape corners                                                                    +drop the aim-time to 3.0,  drop turret dispersion to 0.30                                                                    +give the semi-turret increased span to 50* instead of 45*While there, also give 215B some love:      +buff side hull to 102 like super conquer so it can side scrape corners                                                                    +buff LFP to 139 so it can attempt being heavy, not take damage from everything                                                                    +buff gun depression to  -8,  increase stowage to 45 rounds     

Draschel: Do you expect an ''Epic'' tank to mean invulnerable? Undefeatable? Just saying chap, Standard B is an extremely high skill floor tank. The reasons why he places it Epic, isn't because the tank is easy to deploy by common players.Standard B requires constant map awareness, it requires constant tactical awareness too in when to clip out VS holding out on shots. It has high pen HE further making it micro managers tanks, And its void armor / dependence on camo mechanics makes it really hard to use for novices,   When was Standard B buffed? I always thought the UFP was only 25mm 

Draschel: See that right there,  lets break down the statements. 1- to say, listen man, you complain too much. Many find you difficult to listen to, even endure. People would listen to your points, far better and more closely, if you let go of the complaints, sneering, snide attitude, and overall defensiveness. You lack social tact. 2- come out saying, listen, you are trash. Stfu Let me guess. You make your new accounts for the sole purpose your previous ones get banned all the time, right? 

Draschel: I don't want a win were i did nothing. I don't want a win, where i did something next to nothing. Do I want to win? Sure do. But what I want more than wins is trying my best possible, and getting as much possible use as I can, in as many fields of metrics that I can. Doing that typically nets you wins in the long run. You are under some misguided delusion, that the lucky guy can be exactly that, and just win all his battles regardless of what they do. Typically, though one man won't win all his battles, the more one man does in each battle, the higher the chance present to win the battle Say you completed a trig function, and your answer is correct. Your algebra teacher is hardly interested in your correct answer. Your algebra teacher is incredibly interested in your forumlation and steps leading to the answer. Same goes with tanks. 

Draschel:  500 more damage caused. What tier? How much more assistance damage in addition.At what ranges are the damage being caused at?  (see game result damage over 300m tab) How much more kills per game, between the two.How much more enemies spotted per match.What was the base experience earned per match, without using win/loss modifierHow many battles ended in survival versus stopping due to death? Yes, so, how many of the battles were wins, is just another metric. Not the least important, not the most either. So what you just said, basically says you care about a single facet of the game. I care about a very many. That tends to result in more winning, too. 

Draschel:  Lets take a look at this statement. Evaluating rhetoric, it comes down to the tact used. Even if the message can be similar, one must mind their manners.1- One person may say,  '' You perform poorly, compared to others. Sorry, but perhaps you do not understand fundamentals, or other issues bar your progress. Averages amongst others, dictate higher performance in this criteria''2- Another may say,  ''you are horrible. Why play if you suck? Learn to play potato. Actually better yet, just uninstall, no one cares about you scrubs anyway'' I can see you do not know which is which. 

Draschel: Yes, not no.Playing with hardware that places constraints on performance, is user error in its own right. If the case, its considered unmanageable. Don't play. If you do choose to still play, well you certainly are explaining yourself as to the type of player you are. Casual. If that is the case, you just answered all questions here.  By the way, telling someone to play better, improve, that they do not understand  -  isn't shaming. I am not sure how you learned the english language and what about conversation you cannot comprehend, but there is a fine line here.  A teacher, to an underperforming student, can say the following quite clearly. ''You are underperforming, doing poorly.'' Contrasted to others, around''But to say the same thing, but bluntly, impolitely, flagrantly - ''dude you are so bad. You suck, uninstall''You see the difference? One is a clear insult, definitely with little other intent but to incite, whereas the other isn't, but merely factual representation of results. If you do not understand semantics, results based posting, and above all minding your manners -  why bother posting? Is worth the strike?   

Draschel: I didn't know you were a comedian as well, in addition to being a poorer performing player. Just because you are above the average of 48% standard, it means very little once bishop, T67, AT2, T1 heavy are taken away from your sums. Because these heavily sway your WR, among the lesser useful stats people aim for to begin with, and after whats left? A WN8 considerably less than average, someone who immediately shows clear signs of struggle merely just moving one tier up to T6. Do you think people are stupid, and can't read?  I am not stat shaming. I am saying you under perform. People can over perform, perform well, perform average, perform sub-par, perform poorly. This has absolutely no connotation towards one person, insulting another. Its merely reflection of one's service, and the results of their understanding. Why talk of 3 marks though, if you understand so little about them? To say, type - is one thing. But achieving is very much another 

Draschel:  They never did choose it. People complaints over several years, got them to turn it down to +2/-2Wargaming chose -4/+4, or even worse 5/5 for some. Alot of people in here seem to wave & ignore it. 

churchill50: Either that or a way to view the Field Mod level in the garage without having to go to the Field Mods screen.Either one would be a massive improvement.

Einzelganger7:  Or maybe Über VK to make it more immersive. 

Draschel: Showing top half of Indien panzer hull is great for ricochet angle, when using backward sloped ridge.  Not about sitting still and firing. Though with this sort of RoF, there is time to poke about after a shotBut more about putting yourself in the position to be firing as much possible. With low riskAnd when doing so, indien panzer has substantially better volume of fire. Perhaps a better example, using tanks with initial strike damage. Lets use 390               Is there a difference, in DPM with tanks that trade and/or poke when using slower rates of fire? Like STG and Defender? Now compare with tanks like 53TP, IS6. That also focus on initial shot damage, but do it alot faster. DPM matters, 200 DPM certainly matters 

Draschel:  woo boy, if you think that AMX51 is the most OP tier 9 tank, even when it came out years ago......holy bananas from banana land banana ramaCircon could have been in many other tier 9s there, the result would be the same. Its not just circon though. orzanel has said the same. quickybaby don't like it. sirfoch disagreed with it. Skill4ltu has said its disgusting most of october. Iyouxin said it shouldn't be around. But why just use uni's?  Claus hates it. I am sure jingles isn't hot for it. Frankly, we don't need this anymore. Do we need  0  tier MM spread, all the same tier? We certainly do not, and I would be the first complaining against it. +1/-1 is the necessary sweet spot, to both dissuade people farming one another and incentive to tier up, while also being fair enough and having even lowbies able to more effectively contribute without fear of dramatic punishment.  

Draschel:  Why call it easy mode if you don't do well in it? What about the easy part? Why call it easy mode, if so many like you don't do well? Why is it, that many great players, are willing to say +2/-2 needs to go, as something that will benefit the not so great players? And it will.

Draschel: because.....wait because, you said you have other accounts and things don't matter?You said that, not me. Back to the point, this isn't about an account that farms bots or whatever, no one cares about anything below tier 8. Irrelevant of the poster, its widely accepted no one gives two smelly __ about anything below tier 8 

Draschel: No. And no.Fortunately, though the indien panzer base armor is thin, it relies on ricochet angle. That is where its armor works. Front profiles sees both indien and mutz have similar purple ricochet zones, but mutz only has 40mm, so 120+ bore is going through. Indien has 60mm, so it will even ricochet Jag panzer. The side armor is also 60, and not measly 30, so lots of ricochets. 220 DPM is not negligible. That is more than 10%. Thats a free rammer. Thats more than a free rammer. We are talking almost 1 full shot damage more per minute. With vehicles having DPM like Panther 88, RH07, Caernarvon, Caernarvon AX, STA1, 274A, Lansen - having base below 2000 is silly unless high pen gimmick, autoloader, or excellent platform     

Draschel:  While mutz can player better vision games, and has better gun handling  -  Indien has way better DPM and armor 

Draschel:  +4/-4 makes you think. +5/-5 too, for LT/SPG/HvyWe don't need +2/-2 for all you people who think 2/2 is fine. Because we should be having +4/-4. More challenge. More diversity Hey, you people say it. Not me. Least we can do here, is not be hypocrites. 

Draschel:  I come from a time of +4/-4 gameplay. Where even,  light tanks/arta/Heavies went +5/-5. I remember T1 heavy facing off against IS4 and E75. At this time, there were no gold rounds, because no nut, except the really weird one, would be dropping gold on tier 3.4.5.6 premium shells. POretty much, this prepared me for just about any MM spread. When it was +4/-4, i wanted +1/-1. When WG accepted that changes needed to be done, and made it +3/-3, not enough. WG again, accepted changes were necessary and made it +2/-2. Not enough, should be +1/-1. WG again, accepted changes needed, and made tier 3s no longer dragged up to tier 5,  made 3/5/7 to try to even up MM. Well that didn't last long, now did it. Point is, for all of the following::  not once have I ever asked for 0 tier MM spread all same tier.  Neither does WG really know much about their MM because they change it so often. And I never per se requested +1/-1 for me specifically, but rather to be implemented for others as a means of making the game healthier fairer. If for once, you actually tried reading, like how I provide you the courtesy of reading your nonsense, you'd see that. You know absolutely nothing of marking. With a reduced +1/-1 tier spread, the majority of people will be doing better. Better, as in netting more combined. Because greater than amounts of low + middle tiers generally take place very common in +2/-2 tier spread,  single tier spread eliminates both low tier and high tier HP discrepancies, evening out yet increasing overall HP per battle. Single tier spread + greater overall HP available, means more combined per match on average. This means 3 marking reqs will increase. Not decrease. For example, a tier 6-8. 7-9 match using common 3/5/7  4/4/7  4/5/6  will have LESS  HP  inside, than single tiered 5/10  8 or 9. The lower amount of higher tier, high HP  3-4 tanks are outweighed by the greater volume of middle HP.  You don't understand. You don't understand about many things.  Being a good player, means doing well in the game. You aren't a good player, because you do poorly at the game. I'd like to set aside that you do poorly, because you choose to do poorly, but hey maybe you do. I wouldn't know. But as I said, that aside, you do poorly because you don't understand what it takes to do well. Or in practice, can't make the fluid transition for what you know to what needs to be done, in practice.  

Draschel:  Tier 5?No one cares about anything below tier 8What on earth are you talking about tier 5

Draschel: That is why you perform the way you do. Inability to comprehend things, and in practice exercise them. 

TragicLoss: Once again, we do not handle any money period. We do not handle the merch store.

KRZYBooP: Howdy Boom Jockeys! 
  On track for the IS-4 is happening now 20Oct-22Oct. 
If you would like more information on the on track click HERE.
If you are interested in going up the tree faster then you should look at our fast track offers HERE.

TeriyakiTanker:
I believe if you only get national fragments if you have tanks that aren’t researched.  So in my situation I had all the tech tree tanks unlocked when they came out with fragments so I only get universal fragments for the most part.  I have over 2000 universal fragments and a much smaller amount of national fragments, most of which have been from battle pass.

Einzelganger7: In the header of the article there is also a Progetto 66.   

KRZYBooP: Howdy Boom Jockeys!  I dun messed up my tummy with too many candies and can't make it to school today.  Please don't terrorize the sub!  Enjoy this instructional, 100% historically accurate video and write a paragraph about what you learned.   DON'T YOU DARE CHEAT! I will know and you will be in serious trouble.  

churchill50: You get charged only once per game, no matter how many times you use your repair kit (unless you don't use it at all, in which case you aren't charged).The only exception is if you take two repair kits (one large and one small) and use both. In that case, you will be charged for both. If you want to verify this, just pay attention to the third tab of the post-battle results screen. It will show you how many credits were charged for consumables.

churchill50: I did enjoy the grind through the Indien Panzer. It was a solid, reliable, pretty flexible medium tank. However, it also wasn't unique enough for me to keep it after I had finished the grind. That's just personal preference though.

churchill50: Yep, that's happening for a lot of people. WG released this article a week ago:https://na.wargaming...t-issues/34632/It's a known issue that they're working on, but no ETA on a fix.

TeriyakiTanker:
Completely disagree, with the exception of high tier heavies and of course the T-100lt is way better than the German tier X light.  Other than that though I would say the Germans have great mediums and tank destroyers.  The Tiger I is a much better heavy at Tier VII than the IS. So to me it comes down to individual tanks at individual tiers.  You cannot just say all Russian tanks are better than all German tanks.  It’s simply not true.  And that isn’t even considering premiums.  Skorpion is a slightly better TD than the SU-130, E-25 might be the most OP TD in the game tier for tier, Pz B2 is still really good at Tier IV.

Draschel: i keep mine too. The indien panzer really is not bad. The high explosive can make it quite dangerousWhile I wouldn't say its a vehicle to challenge the likes of T44100, LIS, 274A, or RH07 - it stacks up against mutz well.I'd say it can favorably compete with alot of B rated tier 8 premium meds, like T1LPC, RAAC, Lansen, STA2. 

Draschel: isn't about superiority. Its about knowing and not knowing. And you do not know. Glad you pointed out your emphasis on the super aggressive, and not the super good.I don't platoon. I near 30,000 random battle, and do not even have 100 in platoon. 

Draschel: As far as logic, truth, fact, reasonability go towards being able to effectively play this game, I am certain you don't have any. You can vest anyother 38k, and still won't   

Draschel:  By the way, riddle me this batman. Lets use chrysler as an example. If I were to tell WG developmental teams, ''Hey champs, errr......komrades, can Chrysler have 1,200 horsepower and cross terrain with 1.92 modifier?''  First of all, is this asking for a buff? The tank is SUPPOSED to have 1,200 horsepower, and 1.92 soft terrain crossing stat. If it doesn't have it right now, thats an issue, isn't it? You see the logic here, you can't buff a tank to the values its currently displayed as to having.....????????  Error 404.  Secondly, the easier answer and effectively concluding the discussion, WG can just reply with sorry.  ''Chrysler has 1,200 horsepower already, and crosses soft terrain with value 1.92. Use game client data, please.''  Your 3rd party sourced materials, are incorrect. We have warned users before of this happening.  

Draschel:  Uhhhh.....what are you talking about? I'm lost. First off lets calm down and be civil, shall we? I didn't accuse WG of anything.Second, I didn't say WG has undertaken any secret nerfs. I asked of opinions about discrepancies between 3rd party sites, and deniability if they are true or not.               Though, one can dwell on the word 'introducing'  You said it not me. Perhaps WG 'introduced' these vehicles into the game with the statistics that do not match their listed statistics, which in that case is FAR WORSE than any nerf,              though itself not technically a nerf. It is in fact lying, dishonest salesmanship, and false advertising. I am not doling out judgement, I am curious, how exactly do people view this? . Third, yes correct. I have no evidence of how these discrepancies culminate to what we have today. I don't know of WGs scripting, nor do I know of 3rd party testing methods. I will neither say which side of the coin is correct / incorrect. However, one side has been a very valued, insider source of reliable inner game workings for a long time now. While the other side has long held reputation of hiding materials, which would otherwise be important for people to know and decide on their purchases.  Perhaps you misunderstand. I didn't talk about Type 59, Type 62, Suka pershing changes themselves, nor do I care of them. I am merely comparing / contrasting those events of controversy, to what we aren't seeing today concerning the mobility statistics discrepancies. They are unalike, and it is most interesting. The people quick to jump to the defense of the listed premium tanks, are of course their owners. Well, alot of the tanks that are differently portrayed by both parties here, are premium tanks. So why aren't the reactions the same? Most confusing. I never said anything about RNG. And I do think of what I wantI didn't imply anything specifically of each of the changes for Type 62, Type 59, Suka pershing. But rather the outward reactions from people to these changes, meaning::  why isn't it the same now.  

TeriyakiTanker:
This is the best solution, anyone with less than a 48% win rate gets fenced off onto a separate server.

Draschel:  http://forum.worldof...3-hidden-stats/ Don't think too hard. 

Draschel: I just want others to know, this isn't a demand for buff this and buff that. And it isn't scrutiny towards WG, as they reserve the ultimate right to deny 3rd party websites' claims to true values. It isn't about that. But what I am extremely confused with, is the ongoing silent treatment concerning it. With the population. Sure, I read the occasional reddit thread about it, once and a while there are even forum threads about it - but holy bananas it ain't anything like the Type 59, Type 62, Suka pershing controversies and debacle that in the past have got everyone up in arms and uproar. Why exactly now are people okay with this? Is it that people simply don't think of these posted claims and numbers are true, are skeptical? Are people waiting for official responses concerning it? Or maybe they simply don't frankly care?  I'm extremely interested, in seeing that hundreds, thousands of people aren't obnoxiously either demanding buffs, demanding their money back, demanding an official response as in proof in the numbers, Etc. But heavens I must say, touch Type 59? or Suka pershing? Entire WoT pop pitchforks and torches in hand, ready for war. I certainly wouldn't mind changes to the Strv57, Chrysler, Patriot, and thunderslow in my garage. But in all actuality, it wouldn't be calling for buffs, now would it. It'd be wanting their actual listed values, and not something less than listed values   

TeriyakiTanker: Actually according to Wikipedia that is not correct.

TeriyakiTanker: From what I can tell the middle wheels were for increasing off-road performance, so looks like when you are on the road only the normal 4 wheels work but when off-roading all 6 work.

TeriyakiTanker: Everyone has tanks they just never win in, its just a thing.  There is no algorithm that is screwing you specifically in your Lorraine.  Eventually if you play enough games you will fix your win rate. Looks like you don't play French mediums all that much, at least at higher tiers.  Do you have a good crew?  And you don't play the Lorraine like the AMX 12t, on top of that Tier VIII is nothing like Tier VI, so its not an indicator of how well you will do in Tier VIII.  Your tier 8+ win rates are all over the place so it might just be you need to practice more and get your crews working a lot better.  Personal opinion is that you just need to develop a feel for the tank and get your crew good and you will be fine.