Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why are we okay with known figures, numbers 2021?

Дата: 19.10.2021 03:25:03
View PostEngineer777, on Oct 19 2021 - 03:27, said:   If you're accusing WG of introducing secret, undisclosed nerfs, just say it.   I have not seen ANY evidence that such things have ever happened. When the Super Pershing was nerfed years ago, it was PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED in advance, no conspiracy.   If you think RNG is rigged just for you, think what you want. However, if it was the way you're implying, the Type 59 would have horrible global stats (WR, XP, etc), but it doesn't.

Draschel:  Uhhhh.....what are you talking about? I'm lost. First off lets calm down and be civil, shall we? I didn't accuse WG of anything.Second, I didn't say WG has undertaken any secret nerfs. I asked of opinions about discrepancies between 3rd party sites, and deniability if they are true or not.               Though, one can dwell on the word 'introducing'  You said it not me. Perhaps WG 'introduced' these vehicles into the game with the statistics that do not match their listed statistics, which in that case is FAR WORSE than any nerf,              though itself not technically a nerf. It is in fact lying, dishonest salesmanship, and false advertising. I am not doling out judgement, I am curious, how exactly do people view this? . Third, yes correct. I have no evidence of how these discrepancies culminate to what we have today. I don't know of WGs scripting, nor do I know of 3rd party testing methods. I will neither say which side of the coin is correct / incorrect. However, one side has been a very valued, insider source of reliable inner game workings for a long time now. While the other side has long held reputation of hiding materials, which would otherwise be important for people to know and decide on their purchases.  Perhaps you misunderstand. I didn't talk about Type 59, Type 62, Suka pershing changes themselves, nor do I care of them. I am merely comparing / contrasting those events of controversy, to what we aren't seeing today concerning the mobility statistics discrepancies. They are unalike, and it is most interesting. The people quick to jump to the defense of the listed premium tanks, are of course their owners. Well, alot of the tanks that are differently portrayed by both parties here, are premium tanks. So why aren't the reactions the same? Most confusing. I never said anything about RNG. And I do think of what I wantI didn't imply anything specifically of each of the changes for Type 62, Type 59, Suka pershing. But rather the outward reactions from people to these changes, meaning::  why isn't it the same now.  

Реклама | Adv