Developers posts on forum

Subject: Sandbox 2021 : testez les nouveaux obus explosifs !
Link on message: #18388679

Subject: Test Sandbox : Obus explosifs retravaillés, FAQ
Link on message: #18388656

Demerdenzizich, on 12 February 2021 - 06:36 PM, said: 6. Parlez-nous des véhicules premium, s'il vous plaît ! Est-ce que le KV-2 ® a été nerf ? Que la colère de l'Empereur vous mène à la victoire ! Nous savons à quel point les chars premium sont importants pour nos joueurs, et c'est pourquoi nous ne voulons pas modifier leurs caractéristiques techniques. Nous ne prévoyons de modifier les caractéristiques ou les obus d'aucun véhicule. Les changements affecteront uniquement les mécaniques des dégâts causés par obus explosif. Cependant, nous étudierons les indicateurs de performance de combat des véhicules premium individuellement et effectuerons les ajustements nécessaires en fonctions des résultats des tests, le cas échéant.   Est-ce que c'est moi ou ils ont choisi l'exemple du KV-2® exprès pour nous dire que si on veut continuer à jouer avec le KV2 tel qu'il est actuellement, il faudra raquer et acheter la version premium?

Subject: Beyond New Year
Link on message: #18386518

Subject: Packt den Stier bei den Hörnern, in der Mond-Herausforderung
Link on message: #18384350

Kueken_Piep, on 12 February 2021 - 04:52 PM, said: Einen kleinen Kritikpunkt hätte ich. Ich fände es fairer, wenn überschüssige XP aus dem zuletzt abgeschlossenen Abschnitt mit in den neuen übernommen werden würden. Sprich, wenn mir noch 200 XP fehlen, ich aber bspw. 800 XP für das letzte Gefecht bekomme, diese 600 direkt im neunen Abschnitt gewertet werden und nicht quasi "verfallen".

Das dürfte WG jetzt nicht umbringen. Wäre ein netter Zug.

Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #18384342

Mr_Missclick, on 12 February 2021 - 05:14 PM, said: Ale pořád je to tvoje vlákno a tvůj DC server nebo tvůj Facebook, který není Wargamingem podporovaný nebo propagovaný. Nutno připomenout, že to vzniklo ještě za éry CC, ale z pozice CM už to není vhodné. Nekomunikuješ s hráči jako osoba Sstyx, ale jako firma Wargaming. Tudíž bych očekával, že se mi takových informací bude dostávat skutečně oficiální cestou, nikoliv formou osobního "blogu" na fóru nebo FB nebo formou chatu na osobním DC serveru. WG má pro CZ vlastní DC server, vlastní FB stránky, kam si myslím, že by aktivita jeho zaměstnanců měla obzvlášť směřovat... protože tyhle kanály a profily WG svým hráčům propaguje. 

Subject: Sandbox 2021: Testet die überarbeiteten HE-Granaten!
Link on message: #18384310

Viennasteel, on 12 February 2021 - 04:27 PM, said:   Das kann echt nicht dein ernst sein. Sind das dann so tolle "Anpassungen" wie beim EBR die chance of engine fire: 0.1 -> 0.15? Gerade in Bezug auf die Radpanzerseuche, die von der HE Änderung natürlich sehr profitieren, und der Erfahrung der ewigen Reaktionszeiten von WG bei Balancing Änderungen, ist diese Aussage ein echter Hohn. 

Subject: Sandbox-Test: Überarbeitete HE-Granaten – FAQ
Link on message: #18384300

Nemii29, on 12 February 2021 - 04:29 PM, said:
Das wird zwangsläufig so sein ja. Ich sehe da aber kein Problem. Die Panzer, die entlastet werden sollen, sind doch die Schweren Heavys die HE in die Fresse bekommen? Warum sollten die im forderen Bereich Zonen zum Overmatchen haben? Dafür gibts doch Weaksspots an sich ;-)   Hm, also ich hab auch von den anderen Anpassungen mit mehr Alpha und so nichts gehalten aber gut, wenn da nur die HE schlecht bewertet wurde.

Subject: Zusammenfassung des Weltkarten-Events: Renaissance
Link on message: #18384270

CEUNexus, on 12 February 2021 - 04:17 PM, said: Kannst / darfst du auch sagen, wieviele Gebote es insgesamt gab? 

Subject: Sandbox-Test: Überarbeitete HE-Granaten – FAQ
Link on message: #18384267

Dr_Sam_X, on 12 February 2021 - 03:41 PM, said:   Nun muss man aber fairerweise sagen, dass durch das masiven Spammen von Goldmunition es so auch nicht der Situation auf dem normalen Server entspricht, oder?
  In meinen Augen sind die Änderungen - falls sie so kommen - nicht gut, denn die HE durch die neue Penetrationsmechanik zu stark wird! Die EBRs können dann viele mittlere Panzer seitlich durchschlagen, womit sie noch stärker werden.
Außerdem kommt es (wie schon vielfach erwähnt) nicht nur schweren Panzern wie Maus und E100 zugute, sondern auch Chieftain und 279, und die brauchen nun wirklich keinen Buff.

Fazit:
Wenn die Änderungen so kommen, dann müssten eigentlich einige Fahrzeuge überarbeitet werden.
Man könnte z. B. die HE vom EBR75 und EBR105 auf 75mm nerfen. Das Wäre ein sinnvoller Anfang.
Dass WG Chieftain und 279 nicht anrühren wird, ist denke ich klar. Daher macht es auch keinen Sinn hier Vorschläge für die Implementierung von Weakspots zu machen, die diese Fahrzeuge eigentlich bräuchten.    


OG_Amarok, on 12 February 2021 - 03:43 PM, said:   Und noch immer wird es nicht verstanden.   Denn natürlich hat die Änderung an der Mechanik unterschiedliche Auswirkungen auf unterschiedliche Fahrzeuge.   Würde die Änderung am Schadensmodell für z.B Räder nur Auswirkungen auf die französischen Radfahrzeuge haben (als Extrembeispiel, nur diese haben schliesslich Räder), hat die Änderung an der HE Auswirkungen primär auf Fahrzeuge ohne echte Weakspots am Turm wie z.B viele RU-Fahrzeuge, Chieftain, Chrysler und Co. Die Auswirkungen auf andere Panzer ist deutlich geringer, weil da die HE nicht Munition der Wahl ist. Da langt eine AP/APCR gegen Weakspots oder die HEAT gegen z.B. die geraden deutschen Flächen.   @Zapfhan: Auch wenn Du sie wohl nicht immer verstehst, bitte nimm die Bedenken der Spielerschaft ernst!


Nemii29, on 12 February 2021 - 03:43 PM, said:   Ich habs jetzt schon ein paar mal geschrieben, vllt. versuchts ja WG auf diese Art. Die Formel anpassen, Die Engine Decks bearbeiten (Arty macht dann auch weniger Schaden) und dann schauen, wie die Daten sind.


Igor_der_Metzger, on 12 February 2021 - 03:56 PM, said:   Ehre, wem Ehre gebührt. Aber wenn man dem Whistleblower auf TAP Glauben schenken darf, ist das Thema in Minsk bereits entschieden, ebenso wie Crew 2.0. Sandbox ist nur dazu da, die Community in Sicherheit zu wiegen und ihr vorzugaukeln, sie wäre in den Entscheidungsprozeß involviert.


Trohet, on 12 February 2021 - 03:56 PM, said:   Ja natürlich profitieren auch E100 und Maus davon, WENN sie mal mit HE beschossen werden(z.B. FV). Aber wer (außer FV) schießt auf einen Maus oder E100 Turm nicht einfach mit Goldmun und bekommt safe seinen Damage anstatt geringeren HE Dmg?


Nemii29, on 12 February 2021 - 04:02 PM, said:
Die Erste Munitionsänderung wurde weggeklatscht. Das wird hier auch in einer Form kommen. So wird das auf keinen Fall umbesetzt. Damit macht sich WG viel zu viel Arbeit an anderen Stellen und vergrault eine größere Gruppe an Spielern.   Crew 2.0 wurde noch nicht getestet.

Subject: Update 1.12 CT1 - General Feedback
Link on message: #18384177

Nornir, on 12 February 2021 - 03:36 PM, said: It seems to me that one have to kiss a lot of a$$ in order to get an answer from WG staff, so here it is my attempt:   WOW! Such nice changes! WELL DONE WG! This is awesome news! It is very thoughtful of you to re balance STA / Guard / S Pershing and so on. Oh , wait the good news does not stop here...we are getting some kind of a market for unused blueprints stockpiling in our garage! Yaaay! Oh and that hp bar? I was looking for it for ages...really nice job.   1. Why the switch between SH and FL when clearly SH needs a lot of rework and FL barely needs anything else than new maps?   2. Why remove reward vehicles from those mods? What happens to the people who did not manage to get those vehicles, will they be able to get those in the future through other means?   3. Will the new and longer battle pass require players to get 3 improved battle passes (if they wish to) or it will be just one like before? Moreover will one be able to buy more stages in batches of 20?   4. Will battle pass run a longer time? Or is just the same amount of time only with more stages?   Kind Regards, Nornir    

Subject: Update 1.12 CT1 - New Mods
Link on message: #18384167

Subject: Sandbox-Test: Überarbeitete HE-Granaten – FAQ
Link on message: #18384133

Geno1isme, on 12 February 2021 - 03:08 PM, said: Das FAQ zeigt schön dass WG nicht weis was sie da machen, Stichwort "mehr Schaden an Papierpanzern".


Geno1isme, on 12 February 2021 - 03:19 PM, said: Ersetze "Eigenschaften" durch "numerische Werte". Sie sind anscheinend nicht in der Lage ein paar Zahlen zu ändern, also wird an der Logik rumgedoktort.


OG_Amarok, on 12 February 2021 - 03:22 PM, said: Und bevor Zapfhan wieder mit "aber der E 100 profitiert doch auch" kommt..  gegen die deutschen Fahrzeuge mit der geraden Panzerung hilft die Russen-HEAT. Da schießt niemand man HE drauf. Und wenn ich mit dem FV4005 nicht mehr auf Flächen sondern auf Weakspots zielen soll, gebt ihm eine entsprechende Genauigkeit und Einzielzeit.   Btw.. das soll ein Sandbox-Server für/gegen die HE-Änderung sein... warum schiessen die alle GOLD?!?

Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #18384100

Mr_Missclick, on 12 February 2021 - 04:08 PM, said: Takové statistiky jsou sice zajímavé, ale měly by přicházet nějakou oficiálnější cestou... třeba je dát na oficiální DC nebo rovnou jako článeček. Dávat to do svého osobního koutku, případně na svůj osobní DC je takové... no.

Subject: Zusammenfassung des Weltkarten-Events: Renaissance
Link on message: #18384058

Subject: Sstyxina informuje o novinkách
Link on message: #18384051

Subject: Update 1.12 CT1 - Bugs and Technical Issues
Link on message: #18384022

Strategic_mind, on 11 February 2021 - 06:59 PM, said: Pretty hard to test anything when you start out with 0 creds and 0 gold.

Subject: These mods should implemented in game %100.
Link on message: #18384008

hjorte, on 12 February 2021 - 12:07 PM, said: HeatResistantBFG, on 12 February 2021 - 12:57 PM, said: Don't forget to say that in our feedback thread  
Along with an updated list of mods you liked to see added perhaps?   I can name a killer mod, which would be nice to see implemented  Now, where is that thread... 12:09 Added after 1 minute MyArmorIsGolden, on 27 January 2021 - 04:30 PM, said:  Armour Penetration Indicator.   Needs a check mark. The feature has been in the game for years.


HeatResistantBFG, on 12 February 2021 - 12:57 PM, said: Don't forget to say that in our feedback thread  
Along with an updated list of mods you liked to see added perhaps?


MyArmorIsGolden, on 27 January 2021 - 04:30 PM, said:  Armour Penetration Indicator.

Subject: Teamkonfrontation 2021: Ratgeber zum Event
Link on message: #18383969

kajakfahrer, on 10 February 2021 - 01:36 PM, said: Frage: Wann werden die BB Panzer aus dem Hangar wieder entfernt, und wird das Zubehör automatisch ausgebaut? Wollt jetzt nicht extra ausbauen, wenn das eh bald automatisch ausgebaut wird. 

Subject: Sandbox 2021: Testet die überarbeiteten HE-Granaten!
Link on message: #18383962

Fritz_B, on 12 February 2021 - 10:15 AM, said: Aber ich seh schon, das Ergebnis war nicht wie erwartet! Die Spielerschaft hat nicht wie gewünscht vermehrt Premiummun gespamt sondern ist zur preisgünstigeren Alternative HE gewechselt. Aus dem Grund soll die nun auch weggenerft werden! 

Subject: I have a dream ...
Link on message: #18383954

VojvodaLjube, on 12 February 2021 - 01:59 PM, said: ... that WG one day, when they collect some money, will make a map that rotates.  


Miepie, on 12 February 2021 - 02:18 PM, said: If you mean a minimap that rotates when you rotate your tank, I demand that it is optional. I really would not like that.

Subject: I want some powercreep back.
Link on message: #18383939

lord_chipmonk, on 12 February 2021 - 01:35 PM, said:     Nice to hear in this day and age of kneejerk reactions and listening to whoever is shouting the loudest regardless of their validity. 


saxsan4, on 12 February 2021 - 01:36 PM, said: please, the UK lights need more shells


Crusader2k13, on 12 February 2021 - 01:54 PM, said:   You both know, that literally no player (with atleast half a working brain cell) is really complaining about introducing balanced prems and tech tree tanks (in fact, they always asked for that), but you also know, that introducing balanced tanks into a raw fest of unnerfed and too strong prems / techtress, that are already in the game, is utter nonsense and pointless! WG can introduce as many 122TM-GSOR-Trashante-balanced prems as they want, but players won't simply buy or play them, if they can jump into their Bourrasques, Progettos and CS-52s, etc., that's the point!   And yes: WG dug their own balancing-grave on purpose, just by introducing overpowered prems with a USP (unique-selling-point) aka their "overpoweredness" to earn money. Defender and Chrysler, and later Progetto and Borat, are saying hi.   The cycle will now begin from the beginning - WG will buff old prems until they are not that far away from the strongest prems, than they are now, and then introduce new OP prems with OPness as USP. 


lord_chipmonk, on 12 February 2021 - 01:56 PM, said:   Alas there's a thread on the forum front page doing just that. I make no comment/judgement on their level of mental activity, but it's there. 

Subject: HE changes?!? No Premium ammo changes?
Link on message: #18383885

LZ_Mordan, on 11 February 2021 - 10:26 PM, said: I am out.   I won't do the next marathon.   and i am talking my friend out of it.   I am not giving a penny to WG.    I am literally SICK of this unfair pay to win feature.   Food ? Fine. OP reward tanks? OK.   Pay 50 000 credits to pen and kill a slow armored tank frontally without aiming? NOT OK!!!!!!


pihip, on 12 February 2021 - 08:28 AM, said: There's no point to open threads like this.

WG does not care (not that they ever cared about anything outside vodka-fueled RU anyway), and majority of forumites are either the tryhard "gold ammo is fine, HE is for the handicapped" flavor or don't mind and carry on no matter what WG throws in their faces.

For the record, I too am against this obvious nerf to HE because it only caters to a minor cadre of elitist t**** and provides no real benefit to the game itself, but you can browse this section and see how any and all discussions on the matter go.

Subject: Take the Bull by the Horns in the Lunar Challenge
Link on message: #18383874

Geno1isme, on 11 February 2021 - 01:48 PM, said: Your comparison doesn't quite fit. The proper comparison would be that the store offers you a coupon for 30% off the next bottle of milk for doing some chores, but refuses to sell the milk itself at the regular price but only with some fancy packaging as a special offer for 7 €. But if you invest the next two weeks of your life to work for free for the store you'll get a 100% coupon.   Of course in the physical world that would be illegal ...


lbot, on 10 February 2021 - 11:06 AM, said: Tried to find at least one definitive "for" this tank.   400 alpha - countered by 14,3 CD. If WoT offered more or less guaranteed hits/penetrations/damage every shot, this could do. But it is too often a "miss", "not penetrated", "300 instead of 400", stay on line, wait for another shot, please, thank you for your patience" kind of deal. IMO, it's better to have more chances to do at least some damage with lower alpha. Rate of fire rules. STG has 390 alpha and 11,5 CD. Maybe even 10,5 after rebalance.   233 penetration. It's good, but not THAT good, considering the above paragraph. Liberte has 232 pen, 8,5 CD with 300 alpha and tier-decent full frontal armor (except for cupola). 299 gold pen - some (many?) people don't care, because we use premium tier 8's for silver farming or just for tier 8 gaming without premium account.   Shell velocity - a matter of habit. If you tend to play 1 tank in a series of games, you will get used to almost any velocity, if you tend to switch tanks often, you will find it harder going from 1300 to, say, 950 or even lower, which many tanks have.   Armor - seems nice, but nothing fancy because of the 2 cupolas. Still to be seen in action, but cupolas will not go anywhere.   -8 depression is good. By the way, straight backwards depression is only -5.   Dispersion values for hull and turret turning are equal to 274a and noticeably worse than STG.   Final dispersion of 0,30 is equal to STG's. It's good. But who knows the undisclosed dispersion values within the aiming circle? Only WG does   Aiming time is good. Partly countered by dispersion upon hull/turret rotation.   Turning speeds of hull and turret are slower than of 274a or STG.   Terrain resistances are equal or worse than those of 274a and especially of STG's.   Camouflage values are worse than those of 274a and especially of STG's.   View range is 370 which is really bad. STG has the same and, being basically a TD it lacks view range greatly. Optics go in expense of rate of fire or aiming time.   So, from raw numbers at tanks.gg 122 TM turns out to be good at best, but mediocre at most. Just my opinion.


kQMA, on 10 February 2021 - 11:20 AM, said: Take these marathons as a sale... i don't take them at all because i'm smarter. 

(Enjoy 17.5 seconds reload on a tier 8 medium tank, it will be fun.) 


Sturmi_0545, on 10 February 2021 - 02:03 PM, said: I wish WG would at least be more smoothly criminal, than just plainly predatory. I wish they'd do it a bit like in WoWs and alternatively offer this tank for 250.000 free XP for example. This should boost free XP conversion a bit which would drain some gold. But I guess this solution would be too complex for the simple minds at WG, and not squeezing the playerbase hard enough.


Shrewd_Ape_In_The_Mist, on 11 February 2021 - 06:10 AM, said: At this rate you'll outwit the mobile games with your boorish and predatory monetization system WG. If you didn't already.   Hard pass. The tank seems not worth it even for just being chinese and that reload time is just absurd.  For me to waste my life few hours a day for 10 days literally betting my sanity and the well being of my keyboard you'd have to come up with something really broken as a reward.   Also I don't understand why people complain about the camo... Clown camo in a clown game; everything fits. No, but seriously - I like the camo of all things. This game has never at any point in time been historically accurate and clown camos are being added for a long time now and this one is exceptionally good. When you see that tank with that camo on the battlefield next to race cars, russian ufo tanks and other clown camos it won't look as ridiculous.


VanGore78, on 11 February 2021 - 08:52 AM, said: So much crying here...pathetic   Participation in this event is OPTIONAL.Nobody is forced to do it. So please, give us a break.    I own all Marathon tanks and never spent more than 10-20% of the initial value. Quite some I managed to get for free. EBR, Bourrasque, Progetto, Lis, 44-100 are nothing but my most played premium tanks in Random, Stronghold, and Frontline. All excellent tanks.   So far most of the marathon tanks were good, often way better than the hyped Loot Box offers, with the of exception 703.   Is the 122M a good tank? We will see what CCs say at launch day. 


Bucur03, on 10 February 2021 - 01:08 AM, said: "The tank is available for everyone just like any other marathon. "--- worst joke ever! WG never give chance to a player who for example started one or two years ago to play, but for one  who play by many years and  had good chances to get Chieftain, 279e, is easier. In campaign you afford teams full of 279e and Chieftain...and wg promote just this guys to have another piece of cake. On marathon be honest and tell me why base xp is lower than usual???? Take one tank before event, and on event, make same amount of damage and see. Guys i know you need to make money but you change game every day, today players need xp to won something, than wg try to not make xp, tomorrow players need win, so wg make you teams reds and you lose, ohhh give you a chance to win, but just if u able to kill 15 enemies every batle. 


NicoPudel04, on 10 February 2021 - 07:22 AM, said: Wow ...    We know you have a job dude, but c'mon .... there is kind of a limit to how much you can pretend not to get it (and i actually wrote on the first few pages how you have been altering the marathon offering less over time, watering it down).   The tank is going to be a 20-25 euro value tank on a 65 euro bundle. For it to be worth it you would need to get 80% discount at least. Not everyone can no-life through that.   17.5s, reduced to 14s. No it's not ok for that reload. Feel free to open up tanks.gg and compare it with 274A, STG, Rev and so on. It will work on the RU server where turbo battles are less prominent, but on the EU server where turbobattles have become the norm ... it will suck big time.   That's actually the part that sucks the most. On one hand the statement that you can get it for free is disingenous (you have to nolife it for something that is getting far worse and has steadily reduced value in newer and newer bundles), and on another hand it is not breaking the game for sure. And ppl want to applaud the 'not break game' bit ... except for the fact that when it comes to a russian tank, they tend to break the game. You addopted this 'balanced' approach 2yrs ago or so, and you delivered us 703 II (122) and 274A in the meantime. 703 now has a 52.35% winrate on the EU server with 152k owners (that we know of); and 274A has a 51.45% winrate with 67k owners. IS-3A who is considered 'bad' has a 52.25% winrate with 129k owners. Defender is 52.64% with 147k owners and 252U has 53.06% with 69k owners.   So this 'balanced' approach seems to be for other nations, not so much for mother russia.

Subject: I want some powercreep back.
Link on message: #18383816

lord_chipmonk, on 12 February 2021 - 12:58 PM, said: HeatResistantBFG, on 12 February 2021 - 01:43 PM, said: We get a lot of "you don't listen"    Personally I think often WG listens too much. Let's be honest. If you ask a player what they want, they want to win and they'll give you an answer that would be beneficial to them. Do they play a heavy? They'll want a nerf to prem. ammo. Do they play lights? They'll want arty to stay in the game. Do they play something other than a light? They'll want arty nerfed/removed and so on and so forth.    WoT was always a good product, which is why we all came along to play and people like me have been playing for the best part of a decade. Do what needs to be done and don't listen to much to people throwing out baseless complaints. Make note of ones you think are valid of course, but feel free to discard the (many) complaints that are just people whining (as I'm sure you do).    Anyway, just my two cents. 


HeatResistantBFG, on 12 February 2021 - 01:43 PM, said: We get a lot of "you don't listen" 

Subject: It's time for WG for to improve the WN8 formula
Link on message: #18383781

TheDrownedApe, on 12 February 2021 - 12:44 PM, said:   I guarantee you every purple player that isn't a reroll wants to win first and foremost. We started this game without Wn8, just a desire to win. Individuals only adopted it as a metric to track improvement once they realised WG wouldn't do this (and they still don't make it easy). WR is far more easily manipulated and no one really understands WGs metric so most give it a good ignoring.   However that isn't the OPs question, that has alrady been answered. OP try making your own or go look at the WOTLabs forum in their mathlab where numberous individuals have tried and you may want to create your own....just not RR please    

Subject: San Valentín: Descuentos, misiones y entregas de suministros de Twitch
Link on message: #18383764

xXxPATOxXxsSsRAMMERsSs, on 12 February 2021 - 12:27 PM, said: Madre mia...... para ofrecer esto.... Wot Empezó bien en su dia pero ahora ya no es un juego que esté en el top de Twich. Ahora son dos chuches que se dan y lo poco mínimamente interesante es suministro épico. 

Subject: Öffentlicher Test Version 1.12 - Allgemeines Feedback
Link on message: #18383742

CEUNexus, on 11 February 2021 - 06:42 PM, said: @Zapfhan: Wird die Anzeige auch in den Clangefechten (CW, Scharmützel, Vorstoß aktiv sein oder muss man dafür weiterhin auf die bekannten Modpacks zurückgreifen?  


Rocksmo, on 12 February 2021 - 08:31 AM, said: An sich gefallen mir die meisten Änderungen ziemlich gut aber warum wurden die Belohnungspanzer für stählerner Jäger entfernt? Ohne diese gibt es praktisch keinen Grund mehr den Modus zu grinden.  


H3NR1K2011, on 12 February 2021 - 09:18 AM, said: Feedback: Gebt uns die Rewardfahrzeuge für Steelhunter und Front wieder. Mir egal wer sich da beschwert hat, für nen läppischen Battlepass, der aller Erfahrung nach keine Panzer, sondern skins bringt, werden nur noch weniger die Modi spielen. Front vt noch für credits (wobei meiner persönlichen Erfahrung nac hdas in randoms shcneller geht und mehr spaß macht). Aber wozu steel hunter?   Das ist eine sehr schlechte ENtscheidung von WG.   Ich dachte erst nach dem video cool, battlepass fortschritt im Steelhunter als zusätzlicher ansporn. War jetzt schockiert dass der eigentliche ansporn weggenommen wird. so schau ich vlt mal 1,2 Runden rein bis ich mal gewinnen, und das wars.   Schade drum, wirklich.      


Dinistrio, on 12 February 2021 - 09:18 AM, said: Gibt es irgendwo eine Liste, was man alles für Blaupausenfragmente bekommen kann und wieviele Fragmente es jeweils kostet?

Subject: I want some powercreep back.
Link on message: #18383708

Subject: Take the Bull by the Horns in the Lunar Challenge
Link on message: #18383666

Sir_Captain_Death, on 11 February 2021 - 09:15 PM, said: Well, this will start in some hours, there will be any streamer with courage to show full campaign? 

Subject: These mods should implemented in game %100.
Link on message: #18383607

MyArmorIsGolden, on 12 February 2021 - 11:23 AM, said: its getting better.


Balc0ra, on 12 February 2021 - 11:27 AM, said:   I was surprised to see all the mods they added into the 1.12 CT test tbh. Inc total team HPs and who has yet to be spotted etc. It's getting better indeed. 


Miepie, on 12 February 2021 - 11:29 AM, said:  

Subject: Update 1.12 CT1 - General Feedback
Link on message: #18383606

falcon_96, on 11 February 2021 - 07:36 PM, said: I have the Super Pershing and STA-2, looking forward to the buffs, but what about the poor CDC...
Also Steel Hunter? Any news about Frontline? Please don't tell us you have axed Frontline to have SH and that new RTS mode you were testing this year.


Denton_0451, on 11 February 2021 - 07:53 PM, said:
Players were whining that Steel Hunter is bad and they want 8 events of Frontline instead. Personally I liked Steel Hunter while I was getting the coins for the reward tank but I'm not going to spend much time on it this year if the progress goes into the battle pass which I'm not interested in.

What is that firing range map teaser at the default zoom settings WG?


vixu, on 11 February 2021 - 08:07 PM, said: Rebalance: not sure if that will do much, but buf is a buf. Though, super pershing would benefit from a bit more penetration...

UI Changes: good. nice changes.

Steel Hunter:

Finally, Steel Hunter won't have its own progression system this year. Instead, you will earn Battle Pass Points based on your position in the post-battle ranking and by completing special missions in Steel Hunter. Enjoy playing Steel Hunter and boost your progress in the epic Battle Pass activity!
Whaaa ??!! Rly ?!! So, why would anyone bother to play this mode? 
  I mean, is anybody even looking at their Battle Pass progress? It is something that happens on its own on the background... So, you take a mode which is interesting for 3-5 games only, connect it to a reward system that nobody cares about.... that's sooo going to work. Ofc, that's just imho. Perhaps there are players who try to max their battle pass scores and love the SH mode just for the gameplay....  
Blueprint exchange: good  


LethalEffect, on 11 February 2021 - 08:12 PM, said: Woooowww Wargaming  These interface changes are more than awesome. It is really nice addition to the game. If you could implement the 3 mark of excellence mode too that would be great. A big big congrats from me to Wargaming.    Just a little request for this spot light bulbs, can you do those a bit bigger if it is possible?    Thanks for this awesome update. 


EchoNorway, on 11 February 2021 - 08:12 PM, said: Kind of just played steel hunter to get the reward tanks, why bother now?


L0rd_0f_War, on 11 February 2021 - 11:33 PM, said: FRONTLINES??? Where is FL? Why does WG keep the one good (the best among the special modes, followed by 7v7) mode it developed in years out of this game, and push SH on us instead. I mean, sure, have SH, but why replace FL. How is SH a replacement for FL. The two modes have nothing to do with one another and FL is far superior. Why can't we have a full season of FL like 2019.   All other UI changes and added features, specially default zoom and team hitpoints are great additions. I also like the fact that special modes count towards battle pass progression, as I don't play or care for turbo randoms anymore. Old Premium tanks balance is also welcome, and I hope sooner than later my obsolete T34 (US Heavy) will see some love. Its utterly useless and obsolete in current WOT meta, and has been gathering dust in the garage for years.


KINGxTOG, on 11 February 2021 - 11:44 PM, said: No reward camo or gold for steal hunt I am kinda sad as wot is getting boring with no tank to grind for


Ragemane, on 12 February 2021 - 08:14 AM, said:   Two questions/suggestions:   1) Why don't you provide the team HP bar in strongholds/clan wars too? I mean in these modes that kind of information matters way more than in random battles....   2) Hopefully you can enable/disable the battle result notification   Beside that: Great that you finally integrate QoL mods into the vanilla client - saving the server and the 50m proxy circle were great additions too!


Firebrande, on 12 February 2021 - 08:45 AM, said:   However, no special reward tank for Shitehunter and Frontgrind is a mistake! It was my only reason to play them....and a nice satisfaction when you receive the hard earned reward   Happy Tanking All    Fires Out!


gertjan3333, on 12 February 2021 - 12:18 PM, said: SH question, who will you follow if you die in the red zone? because you are saying you follow the tank that killed you, but what about if the zone kills you?

Subject: Saint Valentine Sends Discounts, Missions, and Twitch Drops
Link on message: #18383605

Gardar7, on 12 February 2021 - 11:33 AM, said: I was expectiong for the "What is Löwe" Valentine's day Löwe 3d skin to be honest. Disappointing. 


R_P_Chuck, on 12 February 2021 - 12:01 PM, said:   Same here. I checked the news searching for this one but unfortunately there is no 3D skin for Löwe...  Some people said that it would be much better if there was no P2W tanks in WoT and instead you could only buy cosmetics to support you favorite game. Unfortunately this is not possible considering WG's lack of determination in nerfing OP premium tanks just to make gameplay somewhat balanced... Oh, well... 


Block Quote  And if you are looking for something extra special, we will soon be shipping love-filled Premium Shop packages with special customizations to dress up your favorites. Make sure to keep an eye on the portal for those. 

Subject: It's time for WG for to improve the WN8 formula
Link on message: #18383603

arthurwellsley, on 12 February 2021 - 11:25 AM, said:   Your post tends to show that you have a limited evolution due to your cognitive skills.   wn8 was a creation of a mod community of players. It went through various iterations and they were working on wn9. However as those players lost interest in World of Tanks and moved on to other games the development of wn9 ceased. wn8 is now a legacy mod that got passed by the original developers to a different and still active mod community who merely maintain it and keep it up to date. The original group of players who developed wn7 and wn8 actually had pretty awesome math and database skills.   Second wn8 is calculated for each tank in the game and the formula takes into account more than two variables. Did you even read anything about wn8? step 1 rDAMAGE = avgDmg / expDmg -> Basically you divide your average damage / expected damage. rSPOT = avgSpot / expSpot -> Divide Average Spots Per battle / Expected Average Spots Per Battle. rFRAG = avgFrag / expFrag -> Divide Average Kills Per Battle / Expected Kills Per Battle. rDEF = avgDef / expDef -> Divide Average "Decap" Points Per Battle ( Defense points) / Expected "Decap" Points per battle. rWIN = avgWinRate / expWinRate -> Divide Average Winrate / Expected Winrate.   step 2 MAX(X,Y) = Returns the highest value ( Basically if X > Y then it will return X, else, if Y > X it  will return Y and so on) MIN(X,Y) = Returns the lowest value. rWINc = max(0, (rWIN - 0.71) / (1 - 0.71) ) -> Basically this is (rWIN - 0.71) / (1 - 0.71). rDAMAGEc = max(0, (rDAMAGE - 0.22) / (1 - 0.22) ) rFRAGc = max(0, min(rDAMAGEc + 0.2, (rFRAG - 0.12) / (1 - 0.12))) -> Its either (rDAMAGEc + 0.2) or (rFRAG - 0.12) / (1 - 0.12). Depends which one is the lowest. rSPOTc = max(0, min(rDAMAGEc + 0.1, (rSPOT - 0.38) / (1 - 0.38))) rDEFc = max(0, min(rDAMAGEc + 0.1, (rDEF - 0.10) / (1 - 0.10)))   step 3 WN8 = x*rDAMAGEc + x*rDAMAGEc*rFRAGc + x*rFRAGc*rSPOTc + x*rDEFc*rFRAGc + x*MIN(x,rWINc)     Or are you merely moaning that other players that you do not like and wish to report for unsportsmanlike conduct should in someway suffer a penalty in their skill rating?

Subject: What's your best WG physics / ricochets?
Link on message: #18383576

Indomitus, on 12 February 2021 - 05:18 AM, said:

Aimed at the side of the turret, but I suppose the shell was on autopilot, either that or maybe I've unlocked some kind of matrix bullet curving abilities.


shikaka9, on 12 February 2021 - 07:54 AM, said: there was a second shooter   like in 1963

Subject: Shrnutí akce na globální mapě: Renesance
Link on message: #18383493

Subject: Aktualizace 1.11.1 - Hlášení chyb
Link on message: #18383483

Lada_flek, on 11 February 2021 - 08:57 PM, said: Nevím jestli to tady někdo z WG sleduje a čte.....Podle mě ne,ale kdyby přesto to někdo četl,tak bych chtěl poprosit o jednu věc. Vybodněte se na nějaký upravy tanků a zaměřte se na vylepšení servrů. Jedu offky a 3 hráčům spadne hra...????? a pak krásná hláška.... Server přetížen... A to je on-line 72K hráčů.... To děláte naschvál????  Kolik serverů ma RU a kolik EU?? Myslím že to je tak 8:2???? Prosím vylepšete to,tohle je od Vás ubohý... narvali jsme do toho dost peněz,tak  ať to kurňa funguje


Ithron_von_Kremsier, on 11 February 2021 - 10:32 PM, said: Sstyx, dej mi prosím vědět jestli ten problém s nečeřením vody hlásilo víc hráčů nebo zda jsem jediný komu to nefunguje. Pokud je to bug ve hře nemusím ze své strany nic řešit, ale jestli jsem jediný kdo má tento problém pak může být chyba někde u mne a budu se snažit najít problém, třeba instalací starších ovladačů grafiky neboť může jít o bug aktualizovaných ovladačů, či můžu zkusit přeinstalovat celou hru, ale do těchto experimentů bych se pustil jen kdyby tu chybu nehlásili i jiní, nemám neomezený internet a tak každé stahování čehokoli mne něco stojí, proto se nechci zatím do takových experimentů pouštět.

Subject: Sandbox 2021: Testet die überarbeiteten HE-Granaten!
Link on message: #18383283

Dragonheart_26, on 11 February 2021 - 08:18 PM, said: Wow die HE Munition von Panzern wird getestet nice WG nice und der Type 5 Schwer bekommt ein indirekter Nerf, er bekommt zwar eine Ap Shell bei der HE Kanone noch dazu, mit gerade mal 240 Pen (Hust Hust) und die andere Kanone wird nicht angerührt da wird nichts dran gemacht.    


Soldat08I5, on 12 February 2021 - 05:16 AM, said:   Kein bis wenig Schaden ist doch auch verlässlicher Schaden. Sie wollen das man die HE auf Großkalibern genauso wenig spielt wie auf kleinen Kaliber. Lieber die 2 Drücken ($$$) wenn man nicht durch kommt. Ich würde sagen die Bank gewinnt immer.


Planokur90, on 12 February 2021 - 08:56 AM, said: Wenn der Austausch der HE durch HEP Munition so kommt ist sie sinnlos. Die Wirkung ist ja dann die von HEP Munition, da nutzt auch das Lable HE nichts. Ein Massiver Buff für Radpanzer, 279 und T95 Chiftard. Freuen wird das nur die Grinding Sevices da sie die Preise raufschrauben können weil die beiden OP Panzer noch stärker werden. Ich befürchte ja das sich nach der Änderung, sollte sie so kommen, sich noch mehr schlechte Spieler in Artys und EBR´s setzen werden und das T10 gameplay völlig zerstört wird. Ich weiß schon warum ich die Stufen nur auf dem testserver fahre.

Subject: Team Clash 2021: Event Guide
Link on message: #18382050

Subject: Reto lunar: Coged al buey por los cuernos
Link on message: #18382025

Comandante_Che59, on 11 February 2021 - 05:56 PM, said: Bueno Delhroh, si no cortáis ni pincháis en las decisiones de los desarrolladores, siendo como tu dices el nexo entre desarrolladores y los jugadores, de poco nos sirve eso. Al menos espero que transmitas las inquietudes. En mi país, pues a los que no cortan ni pinchan les dicen "cuchara". Solo para la sopa son útiles. Y ya estoy grande para tomarla. Prefiero un buen trozo de carne con patatas. Cuchillo a fondo y tenedor. Nada personal, eh. Saludos.

Subject: Sandbox 2021: Testet die überarbeiteten HE-Granaten!
Link on message: #18381970

Kueken_Piep, on 11 February 2021 - 04:11 PM, said: @ Zapfhan

Wie ist denn der Test jetzt grundsätzlich zu verstehen? Ist er Teil einer Art Testreihe in der alle relevanten Faktoren überarbeitet / angepasst werden sollen oder soll am Ende wirklich eine für sich allein stehende Änderung ausschließlich der HE Munition stehen?

Nur, um das ganze besser einordnen zu können..