Developers posts on forum

Subject: Dyskusja o artylerii
Link on message: #16751572

Subject: Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
Link on message: #16751225

Subject: Lansen C, le loup d'Odin
Link on message: #16751167

ExoticFireCorps, on 22 March 2019 - 06:35 PM, said: Bon sinon le lien qui marche c'est celui ci: https://worldoftanks.eu/fr/lansen-c/

Subject: Forum / game chat practice: Your positive attitude and / or politically corre...
Link on message: #16751162

UserZer00, on 21 March 2019 - 07:48 PM, said: Rules for the thread. 1) You are welcome to comment on any aspect of the game 2) Input must be:     - constructive (as in if you don't like something then suggest reasonable alternatives)     - positive (or at least factual and not negative) 3) Constructive input on other peoples suggestions are welcome, but no attacks, reference to their stats, etc (you know what I mean) 4) Try to avoid subjects with dedicated threads, but if you feel you really must comment about it here then it's OK. Just try to make it something new on the subject 5) No breaking of the forum or chat rules (no swearing, etc.) 6) Also, feel free to use the post as a way of researching "alternative" methods of communicating your frustration with other players, etc.  See if you can find ways of saying things that don't break the forum or chat rules and may actually offer advice on how they can avoid the situation in the future.   Examples:   A: Comment) I feel that the wheeled vehicles don't offer any improvements to the game and only add to the already existing trend of steamroll type battles and "COD" style of gameplay.  One of the main problem is the game engine is not able to correctly render their position, which makes it difficult to spot and react to them the way you can with other tank types.  (not necessarily my true feeling, just giving it as an example)   B: Alternative communication methods) People who camp the red line and use the rest of the team as meat shields really have an impact on my enjoyment of a battle. This frustration often makes me react emotionally in chat and can sometimes end up with me being chat banned.  I think it would be great if WG added a feature to the minimap (or even the main map) that allowed us to click (once) on someone who is camping and add a "campfire" logo or some other visual representation to illustrate our frustration with them..   I was thinking of saying I'd send 250 gold to the 1st positive response if the thread made it over 2 pages without anyone breaking the rules, but then thought that would be too much like bribery.  There are other reasons, but I am leaving the negativity out of it.    Let the games begin!


OIias_of_Sunhillow, on 21 March 2019 - 09:24 PM, said:   All this appears to be, is that you're attempting to set up a forum, within a forum.   Why ? 


kisli, on 22 March 2019 - 12:31 PM, said: Toxicity is natural in cesspits. You should add peace in the Middle-east to your OP, since you're asking for miracles. And your holier-than-thou attitude is toxic too.

Subject: Rééquilibrage de l'artillerie : Changements des paramètres d'étourdis...
Link on message: #16751119

lebellatre, on 22 March 2019 - 03:24 PM, said: bonjour apres le nerf de l année derniere encore un nerf de l arti donc en gros la strategie chez wot, jouer du char sovietique premiun vous ne risquer plus rien avec l art merci encore pour le nerf a venir  


Kinstrarr_is_beast, on 22 March 2019 - 03:33 PM, said: Si les arty était suprimmé la j'aurais vraiment été content. Pour moi il n'y aura aucun changement des artys les games resteront les memes c'est a dire quand il y a plus de 1 arty c'est camping dans un bush au fond de la map...


popojoo, on 22 March 2019 - 03:36 PM, said: bon bah je vais me dépêcher de finir les missions arty ^^


nagonok21, on 22 March 2019 - 03:45 PM, said: Merci wargaming ! J'espère juste que l'équilibrage ne s'arrêterra pas la ... A quand les compétence antistunt ?


Tobi4s_XL, on 22 March 2019 - 05:21 PM, said: Etant joueur d'arty passionné, je ne comprends pas pourquoi ils touchent encore à "l'utilité" des artys en game... Réduire les dégats ou le stun n'est à mon opinion pas une bonne idée...   Je serai pour d'essayer de donner aux artilleries des obus de différent type comme des obus fumigènes, ou des obus éclaireurs, des obus de stuns... qui dynamiserai le gameplay.   L'artillerie étant un char de support, elle doit pouvoir quand même faire plus que 0 dégat sur un super-lourd comme le Type 5...  Pour ce qui est de l'équilibrage, limiter les artileries à 2 au lieu de 3 par équipe me semblerai pluis judicieux, car même pour les joueurs d'artileries  c'est "cancer" de jouer avec d'autre artys... quite à devoir attendre 30s de plus quand on veut jouer SPG.   et dire qu'avant on joué OBJ261 à l'AP (1k dmg / 311 pen -> RIP Maus) ou bien quand one-shooté un char avec un arta de rang inférieur... le bon vieux temps !  


laklouk007, on 22 March 2019 - 05:24 PM, said: Je félicite WG pour ce petit pas en avant, mais je reste convaincu de annulation complète du mécanisme d'étourdissement. 


mas_fanto, on 22 March 2019 - 06:30 PM, said:   pas mal tobi, passionné aussi de l'arty tu as tout dit, choix de plusieurs obuts, max à 2 artys sur une game, changer autre chose je ne pense pas utile; et c'est vrai qu'il arrive, meme avec une M55/55 de faire zero degats sur un super heavy 


Ludivuk, on 22 March 2019 - 06:47 PM, said: C'était déjà plus terrible mais là ça va devenir de moins en moins intéressant de jouer à l'auto-moteur, tout les rageux vont pouvoir se détendre. Vraiment dommage.    

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16751104

Iridiumalloy, on 22 March 2019 - 05:22 PM, said: Firstly, WG please stop using the word MODIFY when you actually mean REDUCE. You are fooling no one with half a brain! You don't replace the word INCREASE with MODIFY so please don't do so for the word REDUCE. Say what you mean, stop trying to hide the truth. Secondly, a small reduction on stun time is not a major issue, but isn't it about time you addressed some other artillery issues in comparison to other tank types: 1) ridiculously long reload times for artillery above tier 5 2) ridiculously long aim times for artillery above tier 5 3) ridiculous accuracy parameters, such that shells are either almost perfectly on target or, as is often the case, way off target even outside the aiming reticule. 4) excessively cheap shells (yes, I am complaining that the shells are too cheap!) 5) excessive amounts of damage done compared to some other shell types (yes, I'm complaining about this too!) 6) insufficient dips and hollows in the maps for arty to hide in whilst still being able to "see" a decent portion of the map. For most tanks it does not matter how big or small a house or rock or hill is for hiding behind as long as it is just big enough, but for artillery, if the obstacle is too big we cannot shoot over it, and shooting around it is not an option. I also agree that 3 artillery units per game is too much, this should be reduced to a maximum of two units.


bilku20, on 22 March 2019 - 05:38 PM, said: Why not you get the arty out of game?!  You keep nerfing it for nobs players. This game shouldn`t be played by anybody.  From now on the arty will be insignificant in the game. No stun, no damage, long reloading time as well and new french vehicles to get fast and kill them. Where are the pros??? Where is the old artie gone? Doing the same thing as in Word of Warships. Destroying the game..  


06_kraG, on 22 March 2019 - 05:39 PM, said: Why are those fancy mathematics introduced to reduce the duration of stun? Why not simply let the durations of the separate stuns run simultaneously? So when after 12 seconds of a 20 second stun a tank is hit with a new 23 second stun, that's it. It will remain stunned for the next 23 seconds.   I find it unrealistic that the second stun would result in a shorter stun because that tank was already stunned.


HansiVonHinten, on 22 March 2019 - 05:59 PM, said:   Ehhh, say what?
Already now, it is like a dead castraded mule. 
You wrote earlier there have/are many complaints about stun, what about all the other complaints about MM, RNG, OP tanks, new op premium tanks, obsolete ols prem tanks, wheelies etc.?
Like so many here has pointed out, it is so easy to balance, reduce number of SPG's to one or two per side.  

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16751086

pihip, on 22 March 2019 - 05:20 PM, said:   Sorry for being blunt, but the more things go on, the more artillery gets castrated as a class. Removing non-HE was fine as AP-HEAT could either do ridiculous damage or oneshot full health heavies which is quite toxic, but castrating HE damage too and now planning a nerf to what attempted to compensate for the HE nerf makes me wonder how long artillery will last as a class before becoming totally unplayable (maybe that's the endgame goal?).

Subject: La Division Infernale LASALLE [LVGF2] recrute
Link on message: #16751082

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16751080

adharus, on 22 March 2019 - 04:31 PM, said: well,i am tierd of this...nerf after nerf,after nerf,eufemistivcly called " rebalance"...way better to compleatly remove artyes,and eyther compensate for xp ,eyther turn spg's in other clases (some can become td's,some can become derp gun armed meds or heavyes)....  another option would be to remove indirect aiming,and basicly spg's would become similar to manny derp's who are in the game..of course, reduction of aiming time in order to match exixting derps would be need it...    


DeleteGamePLS, on 22 March 2019 - 04:37 PM, said: Of course, almost every change on tanks that was made is catastrophic, why did I spend so much time while I was exploring all the nations of artillery ??? that they would then be so embarrassed that they are non-gimmicks after all because a large group of poorer players are hurting every day and place on arty players and are completely uninterested in trying to understand the mechanics of the game, for example, the bot wants to fit in half a Prohorovka with Maus Tank and that he He craves how much he wants, so he does not. Why, for example, do you not concentrate a bit on this unrealistic Russian tanks ????  Obj 907 Obviously, this medium tank are more powerful than any other medium, Obj 257 that binds it with RNG is incredible and so on and so on. This is all the opinion of a player who has played this game for 6 years and every subsequent change looks more and more on this game as the beginning of the ruin, you have a little more fun to keep players interested in this game and not to drive them.


Ironclad_wows_wot, on 22 March 2019 - 05:06 PM, said: lol basically too many people use arty to take out of game,so rather than listening to the majority saying 2 per game they nerf them more ,and please dont say you listen to player's you dont,you just hide behind the wait time excuse for the arty,when the majority of arty player's would say 2 per game is ok,add to that the pathetic xp and money earned ,it's no wonder the game is now flooded with t.d causing more camping.personally i found the original arty easier to play against,all it needed was 2 per game and no heat.job done

Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16751064

VeloceHD, on 22 March 2019 - 05:00 PM, said: Why isn't this in the in-game store for gold? Oh yeah, we all know why.

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16751061

SweZooT, on 22 March 2019 - 04:02 PM, said:  

Subject: Der Panther-Lobbyisten Thread
Link on message: #16751044

_JackkOfDoom, on 22 March 2019 - 04:23 PM, said:     Rache wird kommen.... und sie wird schrecklich und erbarmungslos in 8facher Härte erfolgen. 

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16751021

MooWoolf, on 22 March 2019 - 02:49 PM, said:  


Frenzier, on 22 March 2019 - 03:04 PM, said: SPGs add no value to the gameplay, they add toxicity and unsportsmanlike conduct, their complete removal would benefit the game a lot and reduce frustration levels among the player base immensely.

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16751005

Gremlin182, on 22 March 2019 - 02:41 PM, said: Players already have a way to defend against SPG fire though whenever its suggested some players refuse to use them. Use a spall liner no that's useless much rather use vents or some other equipment. How about a large med kit then that reduces stun duration and adds to the reduced crew casualty bonus of the spall liner. Nope too expensive besides I use food instead.   The slow heavily armoured superheavies that always get targeted can often ignore spg fire. Players have a clear choice if they are victimised by SPG fire then defend against it. If you don't want to do is then that's your choice.   Prevent players stats showing during the battle and you reduce the chances of "good" players being "unfairly" focused. Fix the MM "not tested the current one enough to judge the changes yet"  

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16750994

Cobra6, on 22 March 2019 - 02:17 PM, said: The third or fourth rebalance of the class in the history of WoT?   Honestly, hasn't the time come to just remove it entirely?   Cobra 6


Zylon0, on 22 March 2019 - 02:24 PM, said: Wargaming you nerf the SPG and more nerfs are gonna happen in the near future. Some questions.   Question 1: How will you ensure it remains satisfying to play SPG?    Question 2: Will you increase other statistics on the SPG to make it more effective now that we lost splash radius and stun time? for instance reload time or damage?   Question 3: Will you award more xp for less damage done? (that you caused by your nerf)   Question 4: What about giving xp to the arty when a stunned tank is hit by teammates? The same way destroyed tracks work?   Additional note:   Arty players want to feel relevant as a support class. To have a birds eye view on the battlefield and feel like they help the team win.  At the same time we want that satisfying feeling of really hurting an opposing tank.. that bullseye moment.Yes!!   Arty is frustrating enough to play at times... the incoming nerfs will lower our enjoyment inside the game. Keep this in mind when balancing around arty. Please those that get frustrated getting hit by arty and at the same time please the arty... Because right now it seems your only tackling the frustrations of those getting hit.. What about us arty players?? throw us a bone...   How did we get in this whole situation?   Before all the arty nefs happened in the first place, there was no stun mechanic. Arty shot a big hurting shell once a minute and those that shot a bit faster did less damage. Arty back then was also half as accurate. The problem was AP shells. instead of nerfing arty to oblivion they should have kept the old system, removed AP and made the splash radius bigger. That way tanks only got hit once a minute, less often due to accuracy and for less damage. 

Subject: Update 1.4.1 - Allgemeines Feedback
Link on message: #16750946

FireAbend_1, on 22 March 2019 - 04:52 PM, said: Mit dem Update 1.4.1 wurden die Forschungsabteilung und die Techtrees grafisch verändert. Nun ist mir aufgefallen, dass offenbar dabei die Belohnungen vom Neujahrsfest verschwunden (worden) sind. Dabei handelt es sich um die Fahrzeuge, die man sich aussuchen und mit einen (Kauf-)Rabatt von 100% - 30% belegen konnte - alles weg. Wie stellt ihr euch das vor? Schönen Tag noch

Subject: Probiert den neuen Matchmaker aus
Link on message: #16750870

Horny_Hans, on 21 March 2019 - 10:16 PM, said:   zapfhan sag mal, kann es sein dass es wieder so etwas wie einen newbie schutz gibt? ich hab einen neuen acc angefangen und ich hab jetzt so gut wie immer einstufige gefechte gehabt (nur zwei oder drei in denen ich toptier war, aber sonst noch nichts) ich habe bis jetzt nur maximal T3 bewegt.. noch nie einen T4 gesehen.. ich dachte erst letzte woche, da wäre es zwecks dem mm test.. aber es ist immer noch genau gleich ... weißt du da näheres?

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16750862

OtherPlans, on 22 March 2019 - 01:21 PM, said: I agree with Homer_J: arty is now gonna wait for stun to wear off one tank, then shoot the same tank again. Doesn't sound like it will be much better.   The article says "Our adjustments will consist of several large blocks. First we're planning to reduce the duration of the stun from all artillery hits on already stunned vehicles." Am I understanding correctly that there are other large blocks of adjustments you'll make besides what's in this article? Or does this article cover all these large blocks you mention?    


BoGustavus, on 22 March 2019 - 01:22 PM, said: So the focus of these changes were 1) make non-arty players enjoy the game more and 2) make arty-players enjoy the game more? Nerfing the possibility for arty to deal damage and nerfing the stun duration and increase the value of spalliner (who today is almost an almost irrelevant addition)  will please the non-arty playerbase yes.   But i question, who does this make playing arty more fun? You mention rebalancing of entire techtrees and specifically the poor GW Panther who traded 1 tiny second of reloading time for alot of inaccuracy! Are thees the changes you plan in general for arty? If so, I can tell you you missed the mark completely of making the game more enjoyable for arty-players!


Hocus_Pocus_Gold_Focus, on 22 March 2019 - 01:25 PM, said: Sooo... now I'm going to ask the most important question of this topic   When are we going to get a tier 8 premium spg?  


USA_G, on 22 March 2019 - 01:30 PM, said: The core problem of spg's is that they are not doing what they were supposed to do which is to stop camping, they did quite the opposite which was punish any sort of play that is not camping. I suggest that a different kind of utility that would make the battles more fun and dynamic is something like smoke screens, area denial effects which would promote players to take risks and make the game more fun to play resulting in a more dynamic battlefield. A easy way to balance this is to make artillery do specific roles when the battle starts, A roll of the dice would be able to set it to play for example with only AP rounds with higher reload rate (around 90-130 sec) HE rounds that do splash damage in a wide radius and apply a small stun and finally smoke and area denial shells that would cover or deny an area. When the battle starts randomly arty will get one of these 3 options and no 2 SPG's can have the same option in the same team.   tl;dr : Make arty a support class which promotes dynamic game play with cool mechanics.


pihip, on 22 March 2019 - 01:53 PM, said: Ok so, I'll be that one idiot and say it out loud.

First, artillery was the "whack-a-mole" and it was a pain to land a shot, but when it landed, it hurt like hell. People cried, mamma WG answered, and we got the 9.18 big nerf.   Then, artillery becomes this poor joke of a class where damage has become pathetic, but we get the stun mechanic which does two things - 1) makes players even more frustrated than they usually are and 2) SHOULD make arties team-based vehicles but hardly does that since actual teamwork is a rare sight in randoms.
Now, we're getting the stun effectiveness nerfed (plus additional nerfs here and there) with nothing to counterbalance it (e.g. buff to alpha). Also, we still have several maps that limit the usefulness of arty to almost nothing.

Perhaps you should just remove the class, refund the credits, exp and gold, and be done with it once and for all? WoWs did something similar with aircraft carriers, so there's a precedent. And last I checked, WoWs is a WG game.


Geno1isme, on 22 March 2019 - 01:57 PM, said:   Dream on. In practice arties will either not care about stun at all and just go for damage, or start timing their shots for maximum effect.   Seems to be more of a cosmetic change without noticable consequences.

Subject: Update 1.4.1 - Besatzungsskins
Link on message: #16750841

stereoType64, on 22 March 2019 - 11:08 AM, said:   Auch auf den Weihnachts-Mädels und auf Buffon lassen sich die Skins nicht ändern.   Kurze Frage zu den beiden weiblichen Skins bei Dir: Sind die Nationengebunden, oder können die auf Kommandantinnen aller Nationen gesetzt werden?


weu, on 22 March 2019 - 11:04 AM, said: Mal eine ganz andere Frage: Kaufen kann man die Skins noch nicht, richtig? Ab wann sollen denn die Skins kaufbar sein?

Subject: Rekrutierungsprogramm 2.0: Letzter Schliff
Link on message: #16750829

Subject: Update 1.4.1 - Fehler und Probleme
Link on message: #16750825

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16750807

basin79, on 22 March 2019 - 12:53 PM, said: WG instead of just having to keep cutting the weeds down pull out their roots.

1 arty max per team. Job done. It isn't complicated.


Mazhar_1980, on 22 March 2019 - 12:56 PM, said: Arty mission should be revised as well, it is already not so easy to do the final missions 250ms stun, be the topl player in xp earned etc. These missions are already difficult with arty so they should be made easier after this art nerf


Objec7, on 22 March 2019 - 01:01 PM, said:   The purpose of this stun nerf is to make artilleries choose different targets to stun when there's more than one arty in team. So XVM focus will not be as effective anymore.


BluevRS, on 22 March 2019 - 01:16 PM, said: It's about time you changed arty back to how it used to be before you royally f***ed it up. Maybe if you'd just listened to your playerbase and limited arty to two per side per match. But why would Wargaming ever want to listen to its's customers???

Subject: SPG Rebalance: Changing the Stun Parameters
Link on message: #16750743

mislav_cabeza, on 22 March 2019 - 12:25 PM, said: will you rebalance the spg missions then or it remains as they are?


DaMP13R, on 22 March 2019 - 12:33 PM, said: It's like this totally has went over the head of those at WG, the biggest complaint was the amount of arty in battle not the additional stun?  ... I mean seriously who is concerned about how much your additional stun is when you have 3 arty raining down upon you.    Also when are we going to be given the option to have the free XP back which was spent on the arty lines? they were nerfed into the ground rightly so and now nerfed again.. what's the point in keeping them unlocked/ in garage .. compensate us.


Timewarp76, on 22 March 2019 - 12:35 PM, said: Lets be real, any nerf to arty is a good nerf.


kjkb1980_o7, on 22 March 2019 - 12:42 PM, said: This is great news, thank you Wargaming.   However, please I beg you can you reduce the maximum number of SPG's per game. Reducing the maximum to 2 per team per game would be a fair compromise to both group of players. The current maximum of 3 is hugely detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

Subject: Update 1.4.1 Bug Reports
Link on message: #16750713

Subject: Lansen C, der Wolf von Odin
Link on message: #16750694

Panzerfighter_, on 22 March 2019 - 04:07 PM, said: Was kommt beim nächsten deutschen T8 Prem? Hängt da ein Bierfaß, Rostbratwürste und eine Lederhosn am Panzer?

Subject: Why 99% of "good players" are using gold ammo ?
Link on message: #16750678

BR33K1_PAWAH, on 22 March 2019 - 05:43 AM, said:   What weakspots? 

Subject: Neues vom Supertest: Der TVP T 27
Link on message: #16750672

Botpresse_GER_, on 22 March 2019 - 09:52 AM, said: Neuigkeiten? Irgendwas?

Subject: Update 1.4.1 General feedback
Link on message: #16750636

Steve8066, on 21 March 2019 - 07:29 PM, said:   so are you claiming that over the past, lets say, 18 months, there has been no reduction in the credit calculation for battles?


reddog102, on 21 March 2019 - 08:34 PM, said: Not played tonks for several days now...life is good. Read the forum though! Eekeeboo needs a new job, needs to be much cooler with the community. No point getting mad with us, we are just sharing with you what we think. Game is NOT fun. Personally I think the matchmaking would be fine if WG hadn’t stuck in all the pretend tanks and had Limited the Russian bias a bit, oh yes and left plenty of maps in the rotation, allowed people to select the maps they wanted to play, I’m sure the list goes on. Either way the game is a mess and unrealistic anymore, in fact it sucks! And it is not free to play, it is pay to win! And those sort of games only end up dying, which is a shame as it was once great. So are the mighty and extremely complacent fallen!


Balc0ra, on 21 March 2019 - 09:53 PM, said:   Yeah they have done that mistake before. And when the "estimated" date gets there. The rage topics starts. There is a reason why "soon" is a meme around here.

Subject: just why; crew skins?
Link on message: #16750620

Laiskamato, on 21 March 2019 - 06:58 PM, said:   Cosmetics and clowns are 2 totally different things. What we want is new camos for tanks, either sell em or give em with missions. I don't need a lobster man camo for me crew member.   I understand this game is 7+ and stupid stuff like that might "appeal" to some. But you are also alienating others for putting "superman" crew members. Thank god these are optional so people like me can ignore those skins.   You want more children to play this game? Force a ad in PewDiePie youtube video, you get plenty of children to play this game then. Hell they even might like these clown crew skins as well.

Subject: Referral Program 2.0: The Finishing Touches
Link on message: #16750605

putin389, on 22 March 2019 - 05:19 AM, said: Are you kidding me?
Two days have passed.  The error with the accrual of referral points is not fixed.
 

Subject: Lansen C, der Wolf von Odin
Link on message: #16750559

Vopomat, on 22 March 2019 - 06:30 AM, said:   Das Teil kostet nicht umsonst nur 28 Euro - bis auf die 320 Alpha sehe keine schlagenden Argumente, die für diesen Panzer sprechen. Wenn man den Alpha mal außen vor lässt, sind STA-2 oder RAAC in Kategorien Durchschlag, Aimtime und Genauigkeit besser, wobei der RAAC auch noch Panzerung hat. Gut, mit den Alternativen kannst du keine Schweden trainieren...


Madtanker_1BHS, on 22 March 2019 - 07:22 AM, said: Haut das Crew Layout überhaupt hin? AFAIK haben die UDES14/15 etc.  doch nur 3 Crewmember? Da kann ich ja auch beim 6er STRV bleiben....


DaBaer, on 22 March 2019 - 07:28 AM, said: Und euer Link funzt nicht!

Subject: Schematy: Wszystko, co potrzebujecie wiedzieć
Link on message: #16750482

Silentraz, on 20 March 2019 - 03:37 PM, said: Ile mniej więcej wychodzi czasu na jedno pudełko? Bardzo to zależy od skuteczności?   @Xwoknaj, ile czasu zajęło uzbieranie dużego?

Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16750481

Jumping_Turtle, on 22 March 2019 - 03:28 PM, said:   Do you parhaps know if it's got special MOE just like the KV2R has when you got the one with the Odin skin ?

Subject: Poczujcie moc Wikingów z naszą tapetą Lansen C
Link on message: #16750461

Pinako, on 22 March 2019 - 12:10 PM, said: Czas na suchara Co woła wiking kiedy wchodzi do warzywnego?  O! Dynie!  

Subject: Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
Link on message: #16750457

Subject: Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
Link on message: #16750441

Mr_Eli0T, on 22 March 2019 - 03:12 PM, said: Hallo.... Siergiej ? ... coś się chyba ulało i zapomnieliśmy..... Czy warunki w misjach osobistych kampanii, które wiązały się z ogłuszeniem i czasem ogłuszenia zostaną skorygowane skoro sumaryczny czas ogłuszenia ulega znacznemu zmniejszeniu ?   Potrzebna jasna informacja a nie "chyba", "możliwe", "pracujemy nad tym", "zbieramy dane"

Subject: Czterej Pancerni i Pies: Rudy
Link on message: #16750421

KerimereC, on 22 March 2019 - 06:54 AM, said: A ja się pytam dlaczego on nadal jest w rosyjskim drzewku?????!!!!!!!!

Subject: Czterej Pancerni i Pies: Rudy
Link on message: #16750377

Szymoro_1, on 22 March 2019 - 02:59 PM, said: Chętnie kupię jak będzie w Polskim drzewku. W Rosyjskim nie jest mi potrzebny. Cierpliwie poczekam.

Subject: Welcome Spring with a Big Special
Link on message: #16750346

badabum, on 22 March 2019 - 09:19 AM, said: These short interval expiration dates for missions are unnecessary and extremely annoying. I can see the reason when you are doing a marathon where you try to sell tokens for skipping stages, but for regular events this is a really bad idea; please remember most of your paying customer base are people with jobs who can't be expected to make their schedule around WoT

Subject: Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
Link on message: #16750307

pomidor_zombi, on 22 March 2019 - 03:51 PM, said:   Opcja "gram bez arty" i minimum 30 dni bez grania rakiem.... i wtedy wszyscy będą zadowoleni.