Developers posts on forum

Subject: just why; crew skins?
Link on message: #16747584

Subject: Need an Excalibur advice
Link on message: #16747573

Signal11th, on 20 March 2019 - 03:23 PM, said: If you can pull it out of the rock you're laughing although you will probably get killed by your son who happens to be your sisters son as well... blame Jeremy Kyle..also stay away from dodgy looking women swimming in lakes. also forgot to say  tell any dodgy french geezers called Lance to do one as well especially if the wife is around.

Subject: Remove Wheeled vehicles from the game
Link on message: #16747564

Subject: Wheeled vehicles.
Link on message: #16747544

Subject: Change boosters from hours to battles!
Link on message: #16747536

Subject: MM, Troll Chance to win, add RNG....
Link on message: #16747533

Subject: This game is so unbalanced....(im high tier always but its really boring agai...
Link on message: #16747529

Subject: What do you dislike the most about this game?
Link on message: #16747519

sabre_ferret, on 18 March 2019 - 06:06 PM, said: WG rigging the game is the worst thing.  Have a few days of decent games, then along comes a 15 match losing streak with every game 0-15, every game bottom tier, every shot going wide while you get ammo racked and repeatedly set on fire.  When I eventually quit this joke of a game, it'll be because of that.  

Subject: Small little competition to give WG a helping hand(Tier 8 prem tank up for gr...
Link on message: #16747507

Subject: Game still going to crap?
Link on message: #16747501

Rati_Festa, on 21 March 2019 - 06:01 PM, said: They arent asking for the forum opinion... just 1 disgruntled retired player that has come back to troll a bit. Perhaps listening to them "before" they leave might be a better business plan...

Subject: This new interface sucks
Link on message: #16747493

Subject: Whats the reason for the lock icon under the bonds?
Link on message: #16747478

Subject: Penetration sound
Link on message: #16747457

Subject: About Blueprints
Link on message: #16747453

Subject: Best way to deal with wheeled vehicles?
Link on message: #16747451

Subject: How did you manage to break THAT? (Recruiter points)
Link on message: #16747437

Subject: Blueprints Wargaming
Link on message: #16747432

Subject: Is it me or is this patch "empty"?
Link on message: #16747421

Subject: WN8 vs WR: What's your priority
Link on message: #16747406

Subject: RNG is killing the game
Link on message: #16747365

Subject: Why 99% of "good players" are using gold ammo ?
Link on message: #16747359

BR33K1_PAWAH, on 21 March 2019 - 05:06 PM, said:   WG: "Aim for the weak spots!"      

Subject: Literally unplayable
Link on message: #16747348

Subject: My opinion on merit boxes.
Link on message: #16747340

Subject: EBRs break gameplay. I suspend
Link on message: #16747332

Subject: Lynx vs EBR 75 (fl 10). what are your thoughts?
Link on message: #16747314

Subject: Czy słyszeliście kiedyś o Projekcie Lansen?
Link on message: #16747309

Natural__, on 21 March 2019 - 05:54 PM, said: Lansena widziałem wczoraj na randomku, na Dębinie. Nic nie zdziałał ale to wina operatora, bo kampił razem z tedekami... elc, go podświetlił... ja mu przyłożyłem GWE100... no i tak jakoś...

Subject: Regarding blueprint feature
Link on message: #16747306

Subject: WORLD OF TANKS AND CHEATS MOD!
Link on message: #16747295

Subject: Game still going to crap?
Link on message: #16747293

Subject: Blaupausen: Die wichtigsten Informationen findet ihr gleich hier:
Link on message: #16747287

Subject: Crew skills for E25
Link on message: #16747279

Subject: Pz.Kpfw. IV Schmalturm, niemiecka Chimera
Link on message: #16747277

RenamedUser_5523212089, on 19 March 2019 - 08:07 PM, said: "Całkiem łatwo go ukryć dzięki niskiej wartości kamuflażu" - czy wy czytacie te wiadomości zanim je opublikujecie?


Ziewnik, on 19 March 2019 - 09:31 PM, said: Ja tam widzę, że jest napisane "dzięki niezłej wartości kamuflażu".

Subject: Wiosenna gorączka PD
Link on message: #16747270

geohound, on 18 March 2019 - 10:36 AM, said: Pytania "po co mi exp na premce/10 tierze" za 3...

Subject: Pierwszy prototyp T-54 schodzi ostatni z pola bitwy.
Link on message: #16747266

nr3k, on 21 March 2019 - 11:16 AM, said: Kupiłem kiedyś to gówno i do dziś nie mogę pozbyć się moralnego kaca. Te badziewie jako tako sobie radzi jak wyląduje na topie, ale w IX i X trzeba walić z golda, który i tak jest niesamowicie badziewny, a to mija się z celem, bo premka w końcu ma zarabiać. Ślepy muł z pozornym pancerzem, działem o celności armatki na ziemniaki i beznadziejnymi losowaniami. Nie kupujcie tego.

Subject: Game still going to crap?
Link on message: #16747252

Subject: Update 1.4.1 - Blaupausen
Link on message: #16747226

Erdenstolz, on 21 March 2019 - 06:59 AM, said: Wie ich im anderen Thread schon sagte, ist die ganze Geschichte komplett undurchsichtig:
Was muss ich tun?
Was führt wie zum Gewinn?
Wie ist der Fortschritt einsehbar?
 

Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16747212

Noo_Noo, on 05 March 2019 - 08:23 AM, said:   Please enlighten us to some of the finer aspects of your role.   So the online facts are false? If not then you were wrong. High skill cap / requirement is one thing. A poorly balanced vehicle is another. If you have different facts why not present them because at the moment many people that have viewed and contributed on the RHM thread simply dont believe you when they have a source of what appears to be reliable information that clearly contradicts what you are saying. If it isn't a poorly balanced vehicle then we ask you to simply prove it but as it stands it appears that not even the best players in the game can get an even win loss balance in it. 
  That basically leads to people not believing a word you say and increasing levels of mistrust in you and WG. Which brings me back to my point. If part of your role is to form a strong relationship with the player base how can that happen when the player base doesn't trust you or believe what you say? It's a slippery slope.

I note you haven't replied any further to comments on the RMH thread. Again that doesn't help build a relationship. 

A huge issue that WG has with the player base is that the players often struggle to understand the direction the game is going and why certain decisions are made. I would personally thought that this would have been a gap that a Community Manager would try to close. As it stands you're making it wider. The level of mistrust is growing and do you honestly now believe that dropping player numbers is a result of natural wastage as you have claimed elsewhere, when in reality this stressed relationship exists?


SaintMaddenus, on 06 March 2019 - 10:11 AM, said: Please can we have a sticky Wheeled thread.  Will make your life easier with the auto bop of No as we will have everything in one thread to ignore... I mean read. 


Sfinski, on 08 March 2019 - 02:49 PM, said:   Could you provide your so called facts then? All you've said RHM is hard to play that has nothing to do with its balance.   You've compared it to BC which is also hard to play, but also performs well/great in the hands of a good player, unlike the RHM. So you proved RHM is not balanced yet can't even understand it.   And to top it all off, you were condescending towards the community, who, unlike you, provided actual facts of the matter. Facts that you fail to understand, facts that you try to undermine by saying you posses better facts or should we call them "alternative facts". ALL of this is HIGHLY unprofessional behavior.   And when the community didn't believe your BS, you just left the thread and ignored it all. Again, professional move I have to say.


Captain_Kremen0, on 14 March 2019 - 07:48 AM, said: Get some Warning Points - all the cool cats have them


HanZi, on 15 March 2019 - 02:01 PM, said:   I would like to know, if you sometimes feels as frustrated in the game, as "norm" players do. I live in Denmark, and in every battle, i experience some wierd stuff, like Blank shots - bullets go though opponent - delay, like firing and server react ½ sec later, so i misses my shot - or dont even see opponents, in sight range and in the open field, before they shoot. ????? Worst part atm, is the BUGGY HE ammo, for me in this case, even WG tells us to use it when we meet heavys on the field. Got a replay with a HE ammo duing 550dmg, hitting Skorpion G on turret. NOTHING with the 1st shot, 2nd did dmg.??????? I think this game has the worst servers ever. Do explain, and know what kind of game you are working for. plz.   PS, this is NOT ok.!!!


geoff99, on 17 March 2019 - 05:44 PM, said: I've just seen Taugrim's latest video. https://www.youtube....h?v=ZTC3md2ogV8   He says the Rhm Pzw is rubbish. It reminded me of Eek's defence of it and reference to 'more facts' which apparently give him insights which us mere plebs don't have, and which he won't share or explain.   I came to the forum to express my frustration but found that Sfinksi had already covered the points I wanted to make (below, with slight editing)   I will be very interested to read Eek's eventual response...    


OllieCromwell, on 21 March 2019 - 09:39 AM, said:   I actually was thinking the same .... Eek has gone awfully quiet lately ...   "Eek .. oh Eek ... where art thou Eek ... "

Subject: Bunkier Łączności.
Link on message: #16747176

King_in_the_North_, on 20 March 2019 - 06:00 PM, said: Ożywiając lekko temat, ja mam jedno, zasadnicze pytanie do "ojca prowadzącego", chciałbym aby jakikolwiek pracownik WG nam odpowiedział, czy oddolne inicjatywy graczy World of Tanks mają rację bytu, czy jest sens jakiekolwiek propozycje i sugestie składać, czy temat ten, forum bądź cokolwiek tego typu to właściwe pole do komunikacji w przedmiocie sprawy?
Oczywiście, wiem też, do czego służy system PW i nie omieszkam go użyć, ale pytam - mniemam w imieniu ogółu - czy to co się tutaj dzieje, czy ma to jakieś przełożenie? Bo pisać sobie można do woli, ale jeśli my, jako Ci na końcu tego łańcucha pokarmowego mamy się zaangażować, to chcielibyśmy uzyskać potwierdzenie, że nasz głos zostanie CHOCIAŻ wysłuchany. 
Czekam(y) na odzew.

Subject: Have you Heard of the Lansen Project?
Link on message: #16747158

O_verdose, on 21 March 2019 - 03:32 PM, said: Oh boy i can't wait for the announcement that is going to be on sale. I will pe posting the usual: NOPE.


Cobra6, on 21 March 2019 - 03:50 PM, said: If it's as trash and underwhelming as the Leo, then no thanks. That thing really REALLY put me off the Swedish medium branch.   The Swedish medium branch (new) actually looks really nice but I honestly do not want to play the Leo anymore. With the 7,5cm gun it doesn't have enough ammo. With the 10,5cm gun the gun handling is abysmal. With both the mobility is too low for the amount of armor it has.   Cobra 6

Subject: Update 1.4.1 General feedback
Link on message: #16747149

Geno1isme, on 21 March 2019 - 02:39 PM, said: Pretty much the expected reply.   I specifically talked about a "rough" timeline. You (or rather your guys in Minsk) certainly have a plan what's supposed to be included in the next two-three patches and what most likely will not, after all that's what they are currently working on. So you'll have a pretty good idea if e.g. tanks-for-bonds will likely come before or after swedish mediums. The alternative would be regular status updates regarding the larger projects so we can see some progress. Like the special ammo rebalancing, we have zero clue what if any results you could get from the announced internal testing over the last two months, or how long you think that testing has to continue. Could be that you implement it suddenly in 1.5, or not talk about it until Christmas and then announce that "it didn't work out".   And of course stuff like crewskins and blueprints that are announced and implemented out of nowhere and nobody expected or asked for is serving as a distraction among other things, intended or not.     Yeah, because you DIDN'T really talk about it. It was never officially abandoned as far as I know, nor explained why it didn't work out. Only when following the unofficial news one could get an idea, and only when having a clue about the technical implications. Granted, back then we had to follow unofficial news to get any information Also I think many people didn't really understand what Havoc actually is/was. They just saw the word "engine" and expected a complete graphics overhaul which didn't help at all.   I can therefore use the same example: Why should we trust you to deliver the announced stuff after silently abandoning Havoc? (well, server side, according to Milos you actually implemented it client-side within the Core engine)