Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Major_Rampage
Medium Mayhem Weekend
08.03.2013 02:28:09
Subject: Medium Mayhem Weekend
Link on message: #3908611
Link on message: #3908611
Major_Rampage: The link has been fixed! Thanks for letting us know!
Yoott
De-accurized arty
08.03.2013 01:51:37
Subject: De-accurized arty
Link on message: #3908305
ErwinWho, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:47, said: Yeah, you guys all need to pull your heads out of your aXXXX and
pay attention. It's real, the number of arty has a direct effect on
the accuracy of it.
Link on message: #3908305
ErwinWho, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:47, said: Yeah, you guys all need to pull your heads out of your aXXXX and
pay attention. It's real, the number of arty has a direct effect on
the accuracy of it.Yoott: Is this what you mean... I want to make sure... you didnt invent
any words this time so I wanted to make sure it was clear and
understood your message
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
08.03.2013 01:26:39
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3908089
RayZfox, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:20, said: I have a feeling im not getting them either. Ive grown
sorta bored with this game and dont plan on playing it
anymore. Lol I certinly dont feel like
grinding to get to the tanks I already had because war
gaming decided to be XXXXXXXXX
Link on message: #3908089
RayZfox, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:20, said: I have a feeling im not getting them either. Ive grown
sorta bored with this game and dont plan on playing it
anymore. Lol I certinly dont feel like
grinding to get to the tanks I already had because war
gaming decided to be XXXXXXXXXYoott: That will be a ban for you.. good day and good bye
Hypnotik
6 Whole Hours of Posting Lost
08.03.2013 01:18:50
Subject: 6 Whole Hours of Posting Lost
Link on message: #3908017
Qumefox, on Mar 07 2013 - 21:54, said: KingAlphyn.. Probably the only person on the forum who can get
upvotes for necroing a dead thread that was pointless even when it
was alive. lol
Link on message: #3908017
Qumefox, on Mar 07 2013 - 21:54, said: KingAlphyn.. Probably the only person on the forum who can get
upvotes for necroing a dead thread that was pointless even when it
was alive. lolHypnotik: With that avatar, he can get away with murder.
Yoott
looking for a clan
08.03.2013 01:17:38
Subject: looking for a clan
Link on message: #3908008
zerkis, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:15, said: Cool bunch of guys in the lmf
Link on message: #3908008
zerkis, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:15, said: Cool bunch of guys in the lmfYoott: Where you been man?
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
08.03.2013 01:07:31
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3907917
tanky_the_tank, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:06, said: Were you done with them or not? If you didn't need them you don't
need them now and you lost nothing. If you needed them you were
going to have to buy them again. Instead of buying them back, get a
single tank grind up credits for the replacements.
Link on message: #3907917
tanky_the_tank, on Mar 08 2013 - 01:06, said: Were you done with them or not? If you didn't need them you don't
need them now and you lost nothing. If you needed them you were
going to have to buy them again. Instead of buying them back, get a
single tank grind up credits for the replacements.Yoott: Tier 1's are free ... just saying
some of those makes tons of credits
some of those makes tons of credits
Yoott
SerB be trollin us.
08.03.2013 01:06:34
Hypnotik
Westward Expansion Timelapse
08.03.2013 01:05:39
Subject: Westward Expansion Timelapse
Link on message: #3907904
SeaOtterDefilerOfSeals, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:58, said: Good post/vid OP but your math is off. We got paid for
60k for RI popping at 10:30 am, so we ended at 660k.
Dayus, on Mar 06 2013 - 23:25, said: Wish it had commentary like CW in 45 seconds, but still pretty
nice.
thisguy89, on Mar 06 2013 - 23:44, said: I just like the piano cover of Nothing Else Matters.
Yankee, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:25, said: It's great to see how well the small clans did.
Taka001, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:18, said: Just letting you guys know, please correct me if I am wrong, but I
do believe that no gold recieved for the key provinces.
Link on message: #3907904
SeaOtterDefilerOfSeals, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:58, said: Good post/vid OP but your math is off. We got paid for
60k for RI popping at 10:30 am, so we ended at 660k.Hypnotik: I did not realize that. Oops.
Dayus, on Mar 06 2013 - 23:25, said: Wish it had commentary like CW in 45 seconds, but still pretty
nice.Hypnotik: I'm just not as witty as Relics/Naga I guess
thisguy89, on Mar 06 2013 - 23:44, said: I just like the piano cover of Nothing Else Matters.Hypnotik: The guy has a few more Metallica and other rock band songs done on
piano too.
http://www.youtube.c...ser/scovismusic
http://www.youtube.c...ser/scovismusic
Yankee, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:25, said: It's great to see how well the small clans did.Hypnotik: There were a few that surprised me too. I definitely cam across a
few that made me think "Who are they?".
Taka001, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:18, said: Just letting you guys know, please correct me if I am wrong, but I
do believe that no gold recieved for the key provinces.Hypnotik: I read it differently, but could be wrong. The way things have gone
with this event, nothing would surprise me.
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
08.03.2013 01:02:49
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3907879
RayZfox, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:58, said: I needed to upgrade them. They were fully
researched. Ima say that again" They were fully
researched". So i could sell them for 50% because that's
what everyone does. You sell you tanks for 50% because
you have to then you buy the next tank. However I sold
my tanks early because of the fact that I could earn money 45%
overnight due to the shells. Becuase the shell profits
didn't come though im now stuck without the money to re-buy my
tanks or the money to buy the next high tier as i would have been
HAD WAR GAMING HONORED THEIR RELEASE NOTES.
Link on message: #3907879
RayZfox, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:58, said: I needed to upgrade them. They were fully
researched. Ima say that again" They were fully
researched". So i could sell them for 50% because that's
what everyone does. You sell you tanks for 50% because
you have to then you buy the next tank. However I sold
my tanks early because of the fact that I could earn money 45%
overnight due to the shells. Becuase the shell profits
didn't come though im now stuck without the money to re-buy my
tanks or the money to buy the next high tier as i would have been
HAD WAR GAMING HONORED THEIR RELEASE NOTES.Yoott: you seem to be skipping my replies to you... either by choice or
fear that I have shut your argument down already...
http://forum.worldof...93#entry3907793
They OWE you NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, ZIPPO.... you should not expect an exploit to stay in a game especially when people are giant bigmouths all over the forums with it..... what company anywhere would voluntarily take a loss when they can fix the issues before a release
Enjoy your grind back to buy your next tanks and have a good day...
http://forum.worldof...93#entry3907793
They OWE you NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH, ZIPPO.... you should not expect an exploit to stay in a game especially when people are giant bigmouths all over the forums with it..... what company anywhere would voluntarily take a loss when they can fix the issues before a release
Enjoy your grind back to buy your next tanks and have a good day...
Yoott
looking for a clan
08.03.2013 00:59:49
Subject: looking for a clan
Link on message: #3907860
Link on message: #3907860
Yoott: The Lemming Mafia is always recruiting
We Do CW every night
Platoons every day and night
Tourneys every week
We have no tier or stats requirements...
come check us out and drop by the TS server if interested so we can chat...
http://worldoftanks....t_order_by=role
We Do CW every night
Platoons every day and night
Tourneys every week
We have no tier or stats requirements...
come check us out and drop by the TS server if interested so we can chat...
http://worldoftanks....t_order_by=role
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
08.03.2013 00:48:29
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3907793
RayZfox, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:45, said: I was planning to rebuy higher tiers with a mix of additional
capital. I knew i wouldnt be able to sell my tanks >
buy 83 mm HE MK3's > and then magically end up with a
profit. But I did expect it to be the best possible time
to sell my FULLY RESEARCHED t-20 and IS.
anyways lets do some math.
25,000 * 85 = 2,125,000
25,000 * 130 = 3,250,000
So im getting back after the hot fix 2,125,000. But to rebuy my t-20 and IS i would need 2,764,000. 1,340,000 + 1,424,000 = 2,764,000
Add to that 16,258.823529 of the shells were purchased using money from my t-20 and IS 8741.176470 of the shells were purchased using money I had on hand.
War gaming owes me 1,382,000 to make me square(half of the sell price of my tanks).
I know there are other people sold their tanks too. Somebody 10 pages earlier and hundreds of others who haven't posted. Either because they haven't found this thread, or posted elsewhere or haven realizes that War Gaming took advantage of them buy posting false release notes.
Quote War gaming owes me 1,382,000 to make me square(half of the sell price of my tanks).
I know there are other people sold their tanks too. Somebody 10 pages earlier and hundreds of others who haven't posted. Either because they haven't found this thread, or posted elsewhere or haven realizes that War Gaming took advantage of them buy posting false release notes.
Link on message: #3907793
RayZfox, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:45, said: I was planning to rebuy higher tiers with a mix of additional
capital. I knew i wouldnt be able to sell my tanks >
buy 83 mm HE MK3's > and then magically end up with a
profit. But I did expect it to be the best possible time
to sell my FULLY RESEARCHED t-20 and IS.anyways lets do some math.
25,000 * 85 = 2,125,000
25,000 * 130 = 3,250,000
So im getting back after the hot fix 2,125,000. But to rebuy my t-20 and IS i would need 2,764,000. 1,340,000 + 1,424,000 = 2,764,000
Add to that 16,258.823529 of the shells were purchased using money from my t-20 and IS 8741.176470 of the shells were purchased using money I had on hand.
War gaming owes me 1,382,000 to make me square(half of the sell price of my tanks).
I know there are other people sold their tanks too. Somebody 10 pages earlier and hundreds of others who haven't posted. Either because they haven't found this thread, or posted elsewhere or haven realizes that War Gaming took advantage of them buy posting false release notes.
Yoott: Boy does someone feel entitled...
see my above post ...
http://forum.worldof...15#entry3907715
also part two what I posted earlier
YOU AGREE, THEREFORE, THAT YOU WILL NEVER ASSERT OR BRING ANY CLAIM OR SUIT AGAINST WN, ITS PARENT COMPANIES, DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OR ANY EMPLOYEES OF ANY OF ABOVE, WHICH IS RELATED TO OR BASED ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; (I) A CLAIM THAT YOU "OWN" ANY VIRTUAL GOODS IN ANY GAME, (II) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS IF WN DELETES THEM (AND/OR TERMINATES YOUR ACCOUNT(S)) WITH A REASONABLE CAUSE AT WN' SOLE DESCRETION, (III) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS THAT YOU MAY LOSE IF WN DOES ANYTHING THAT IT IS ENTITLED TO DO PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE APPLICABLE GAME'S USER AGREEMENT AND SOFTWARE LICENSE, PROHIBITED USE, TERMS OF SERVICE AND/OR WN' PRIVACY POLICY, OR FOR ANY MALFUNCTIONS AND/OR "BUGS" IN WN GAMES, (IV) A CLAIM THAT THE "VALUE" OF ANY VIRTUAL GOODS HAS INCREASED OR DECREASED BY VIRTUE OF ANY GAME MODIFICATION THAT WN HAS MADE OR WILL MAKE.
again I guess you missed that part as you clicked Accept without reading in your haste to beat the system and use an exploit of which now you want reimbursement....
in truth you lost nothing as you got back the exact value of credits you had in your account before you bought the shells..... not WG's fault you sold your tanks that falls on you...
http://forum.worldof...rms-of-service/
Ps section 3 of link above is the TOS you agreed to every time you logged in...
see my above post ...
http://forum.worldof...15#entry3907715
also part two what I posted earlier
YOU AGREE, THEREFORE, THAT YOU WILL NEVER ASSERT OR BRING ANY CLAIM OR SUIT AGAINST WN, ITS PARENT COMPANIES, DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OR ANY EMPLOYEES OF ANY OF ABOVE, WHICH IS RELATED TO OR BASED ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; (I) A CLAIM THAT YOU "OWN" ANY VIRTUAL GOODS IN ANY GAME, (II) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS IF WN DELETES THEM (AND/OR TERMINATES YOUR ACCOUNT(S)) WITH A REASONABLE CAUSE AT WN' SOLE DESCRETION, (III) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS THAT YOU MAY LOSE IF WN DOES ANYTHING THAT IT IS ENTITLED TO DO PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE APPLICABLE GAME'S USER AGREEMENT AND SOFTWARE LICENSE, PROHIBITED USE, TERMS OF SERVICE AND/OR WN' PRIVACY POLICY, OR FOR ANY MALFUNCTIONS AND/OR "BUGS" IN WN GAMES, (IV) A CLAIM THAT THE "VALUE" OF ANY VIRTUAL GOODS HAS INCREASED OR DECREASED BY VIRTUE OF ANY GAME MODIFICATION THAT WN HAS MADE OR WILL MAKE.
again I guess you missed that part as you clicked Accept without reading in your haste to beat the system and use an exploit of which now you want reimbursement....
in truth you lost nothing as you got back the exact value of credits you had in your account before you bought the shells..... not WG's fault you sold your tanks that falls on you...
http://forum.worldof...rms-of-service/
Ps section 3 of link above is the TOS you agreed to every time you logged in...
Quote War gaming owes me 1,382,000 to make me square(half of the sell price of my tanks).
I know there are other people sold their tanks too. Somebody 10 pages earlier and hundreds of others who haven't posted. Either because they haven't found this thread, or posted elsewhere or haven realizes that War Gaming took advantage of them buy posting false release notes.
Yoott:
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
08.03.2013 00:38:10
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3907715
Twan, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:34, said: Sorry, reading patch notes and doing 1st grade math isn't an
exploit.
It went live on RU, that's a good enough reason for most people to believe the prices are staying the way they were.
Link on message: #3907715
Twan, on Mar 08 2013 - 00:34, said: Sorry, reading patch notes and doing 1st grade math isn't an
exploit. It went live on RU, that's a good enough reason for most people to believe the prices are staying the way they were.
Yoott: patch notes are not final until it goes LIVE on THIS server....
3. Virtual Goods
You agree that WN reserves the right to manage, regulate, control, modify and/or eliminate its games and all aspects of including but not limited to, game characters, items, points, and Gold (collectively, "Virtual Goods") therein. All Virtual Goods remain property of WN. You acknowledge that WN may, in its sole discretion, in any general or specific case, modify features, functions or abilities of any element of any of its games or any Virtual Goods (which may, among other things, make the Virtual Goods substantially more valuable, effective or functional, or less valuable, effective or functional, more common or less common, or eliminated entirely). You acknowledge and agree that all Virtual Goods represent a limited license right governed by the terms of this Agreement, and are not redeemable for any sum of money or monetary value from WN at any time.
YOU AGREE, THEREFORE, THAT YOU WILL NEVER ASSERT OR BRING ANY CLAIM OR SUIT AGAINST WN, ITS PARENT COMPANIES, DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OR ANY EMPLOYEES OF ANY OF ABOVE, WHICH IS RELATED TO OR BASED ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; (I) A CLAIM THAT YOU "OWN" ANY VIRTUAL GOODS IN ANY GAME, (II) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS IF WN DELETES THEM (AND/OR TERMINATES YOUR ACCOUNT(S)) WITH A REASONABLE CAUSE AT WN' SOLE DESCRETION, (III) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS THAT YOU MAY LOSE IF WN DOES ANYTHING THAT IT IS ENTITLED TO DO PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE APPLICABLE GAME'S USER AGREEMENT AND SOFTWARE LICENSE, PROHIBITED USE, TERMS OF SERVICE AND/OR WN' PRIVACY POLICY, OR FOR ANY MALFUNCTIONS AND/OR "BUGS" IN WN GAMES, (IV) A CLAIM THAT THE "VALUE" OF ANY VIRTUAL GOODS HAS INCREASED OR DECREASED BY VIRTUE OF ANY GAME MODIFICATION THAT WN HAS MADE OR WILL MAKE.
seems you missed that part ... end of discussion .. thread can be closed now... nothing more to see here...
3. Virtual Goods
You agree that WN reserves the right to manage, regulate, control, modify and/or eliminate its games and all aspects of including but not limited to, game characters, items, points, and Gold (collectively, "Virtual Goods") therein. All Virtual Goods remain property of WN. You acknowledge that WN may, in its sole discretion, in any general or specific case, modify features, functions or abilities of any element of any of its games or any Virtual Goods (which may, among other things, make the Virtual Goods substantially more valuable, effective or functional, or less valuable, effective or functional, more common or less common, or eliminated entirely). You acknowledge and agree that all Virtual Goods represent a limited license right governed by the terms of this Agreement, and are not redeemable for any sum of money or monetary value from WN at any time.
YOU AGREE, THEREFORE, THAT YOU WILL NEVER ASSERT OR BRING ANY CLAIM OR SUIT AGAINST WN, ITS PARENT COMPANIES, DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OR ANY EMPLOYEES OF ANY OF ABOVE, WHICH IS RELATED TO OR BASED ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; (I) A CLAIM THAT YOU "OWN" ANY VIRTUAL GOODS IN ANY GAME, (II) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS IF WN DELETES THEM (AND/OR TERMINATES YOUR ACCOUNT(S)) WITH A REASONABLE CAUSE AT WN' SOLE DESCRETION, (III) A CLAIM FOR THE "VALUE" OF VIRTUAL GOODS THAT YOU MAY LOSE IF WN DOES ANYTHING THAT IT IS ENTITLED TO DO PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE APPLICABLE GAME'S USER AGREEMENT AND SOFTWARE LICENSE, PROHIBITED USE, TERMS OF SERVICE AND/OR WN' PRIVACY POLICY, OR FOR ANY MALFUNCTIONS AND/OR "BUGS" IN WN GAMES, (IV) A CLAIM THAT THE "VALUE" OF ANY VIRTUAL GOODS HAS INCREASED OR DECREASED BY VIRTUE OF ANY GAME MODIFICATION THAT WN HAS MADE OR WILL MAKE.
seems you missed that part ... end of discussion .. thread can be closed now... nothing more to see here...
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
08.03.2013 00:14:18
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3907505
Link on message: #3907505
Captain_Judo: A note about this global, pro-format rule:Draws are ruled in favor
of the team with the tier point advantage when that advantage is
equal to or greater than 8 tier points. Team captains must send a
replay and a screenshot of the after battle report (including team
score tab) to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com to apply this
clause. We have amended the requirements necessary to apply your
draw as a win. You will need to submit the following:
A Time StampThe battle report must include the "Personal Score" tab so that we can verify when the draw took place.
You will also need to show the progression of your results by providing screen shots or replays of your other battles. Proof of Score
A battle replay or a screenshot of the "Team Score" tab so that we can verify the remaining tanks at the time of the draw.
You can send the files to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com and you can use the forums PM system to ease communication.
A Time StampThe battle report must include the "Personal Score" tab so that we can verify when the draw took place.
You will also need to show the progression of your results by providing screen shots or replays of your other battles. Proof of Score
A battle replay or a screenshot of the "Team Score" tab so that we can verify the remaining tanks at the time of the draw.
You can send the files to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com and you can use the forums PM system to ease communication.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
08.03.2013 00:14:18
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3907505
Link on message: #3907505
Captain_Judo: A note about this global, pro-format rule:Draws are ruled in favor
of the team with the tier point advantage when that advantage is
equal to or greater than 8 tier points. Team captains must send a
replay and a screenshot of the after battle report (including team
score tab) to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com to apply this
clause. We have amended the requirements necessary to apply your
draw as a win. You will need to submit the following:
A Time Stamp The battle report must include the "Personal Score" tab so that we can verify when the draw took place.
You will also need to show the progression of your results by providing screen shots or replays of your other battles. Proof of Score
A battle replay or a screenshot of the "Team Score" tab so that we can verify the remaining tanks at the time of the draw.
You can send the files to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com and you can use the forums PM system to ease communication.
A Time Stamp The battle report must include the "Personal Score" tab so that we can verify when the draw took place.
You will also need to show the progression of your results by providing screen shots or replays of your other battles. Proof of Score
A battle replay or a screenshot of the "Team Score" tab so that we can verify the remaining tanks at the time of the draw.
You can send the files to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com and you can use the forums PM system to ease communication.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
08.03.2013 00:14:18
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3907505
Link on message: #3907505
Captain_Judo: A note about this global, pro-format rule:Draws are ruled in favor
of the team with the tier point advantage when that advantage is
equal to or greater than 8 tier points. Team captains must send a
replay and a screenshot of the after battle report (including team
score tab) to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com to apply this
clause. We have amended the requirements necessary to apply your
draw as a win. You will need to submit the following:
A Time Stamp The battle report must include the "Personal Score" tab so that we can verify when the draw took place.
You will also need to show the progression of your results by providing screen shots or replays of your other battles. Proof of Score
A battle replay or a screenshot of the "Team Score" tab so that we can verify the remaining tanks at the time of the draw.
You can send the files to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com and you can use the forums PM system to ease communication.
A Time Stamp The battle report must include the "Personal Score" tab so that we can verify when the draw took place.
You will also need to show the progression of your results by providing screen shots or replays of your other battles. Proof of Score
A battle replay or a screenshot of the "Team Score" tab so that we can verify the remaining tanks at the time of the draw.
You can send the files to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com and you can use the forums PM system to ease communication.
CatStalker
8.4 In-Game Tutorial Feedback
07.03.2013 23:38:10
Subject: 8.4 In-Game Tutorial Feedback
Link on message: #3907212
Link on message: #3907212
CatStalker: Please leave your feedback concerning the new in-game tutorial
here.
8.4 patch notes can be found here
8.4 patch notes can be found here
CatStalker
8.4 British TD Feedback
07.03.2013 23:19:01
Subject: 8.4 British TD Feedback
Link on message: #3907085
Link on message: #3907085
CatStalker: Please leave your feedback concerning British TDs here.
You can find more information here about the british TD line.
8.4 patch notes can be found here
You can find more information here about the british TD line.
8.4 patch notes can be found here
CatStalker
8.4 German Tanks Feedback
07.03.2013 23:17:57
Subject: 8.4 German Tanks Feedback
Link on message: #3907075
Link on message: #3907075
CatStalker: Please leave your feedback concerning changes to or the addition of
German tanks here.
8.4 patch notes can be found here
Edit:
In regards to the poll we had up in this thread, it was a bit too specific to really get an understanding of these tanks. Primarily I suspect that the results may be skewered because of a specific tank or two. Because of this, I've widened it out so each tank may be voted on individually. So if you see this and have played with the new tanks, please check a few more answers here.
8.4 patch notes can be found here
Edit:
In regards to the poll we had up in this thread, it was a bit too specific to really get an understanding of these tanks. Primarily I suspect that the results may be skewered because of a specific tank or two. Because of this, I've widened it out so each tank may be voted on individually. So if you see this and have played with the new tanks, please check a few more answers here.
CatStalker
8.4 Updated Maps Feedback
07.03.2013 23:16:29
Subject: 8.4 Updated Maps Feedback
Link on message: #3907059
Link on message: #3907059
CatStalker: Please leave your feedback concerning the updated maps Steppes,
Fisherman's Bay, Ensk and Live Oaks here.
8.4 patch notes can be found here
8.4 patch notes can be found here
CatStalker
8.4 Feedback Thread List - Post all your 8.4 Feedback in these threads!
07.03.2013 23:11:13
Subject: 8.4 Feedback Thread List - Post all your 8.4 Feedback in these threads!
Link on message: #3907020
Link on message: #3907020
CatStalker: Tankers!
Welcome to the 8.4!
In order to keep the forum clean for the large player base, and to make it easier to collect your valued feedback on these update changes.
Please post your feedback and suggestions on the below topics into their associated official threads.Updated Maps (Steppes, Fisherman's Bay, Ensk and Live Oaks)
In-Game Tutorial
British Tank Destroyers
Changes to German Tanks You can find more information here about the 8.4 patch notes.
You can find more information here about the british TD line.
Welcome to the 8.4!
In order to keep the forum clean for the large player base, and to make it easier to collect your valued feedback on these update changes.
Please post your feedback and suggestions on the below topics into their associated official threads.Updated Maps (Steppes, Fisherman's Bay, Ensk and Live Oaks)
In-Game Tutorial
British Tank Destroyers
Changes to German Tanks You can find more information here about the 8.4 patch notes.
You can find more information here about the british TD line.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
07.03.2013 22:58:04
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3906929
Link on message: #3906929
Captain_Judo: The VK2801 is officially Tier 6. This means it's no longer a
legitimate tank in this skirmish. Please take note!
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
07.03.2013 22:58:04
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3906929
Link on message: #3906929
Captain_Judo: The VK2801 is officially Tier 6. This means it's no longer a
legitimate tank in this skirmish. Please take note!
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
07.03.2013 22:58:04
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3906929
Link on message: #3906929
Captain_Judo: The VK2801 is officially Tier 6. This means it's no longer a
legitimate tank in this skirmish. Please take note!
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
07.03.2013 22:56:14
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3906912
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 22:26, said: I lost everything.
Link on message: #3906912
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 22:26, said: I lost everything.Yoott: you didnt lose everything you sold it... and Exploits are bad ...
mmmkay.. now you know and
Knowing is half the battle..... insert GI Joe pic here lol
Knowing is half the battle..... insert GI Joe pic here lol
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 22:44:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906812
mp31b30q9, on Mar 07 2013 - 21:28, said: Seriously?!?
Link on message: #3906812
mp31b30q9, on Mar 07 2013 - 21:28, said: Seriously?!?Mugsy_: I understand you are frustrated but please do your best to
communicate in a constructive, civil manner. I think you can look
at this thread and see clearly that hostility changes the course of
a conversation for the worse. People stop hearing one another and
it reduces to bickering and then the thread gets closed because it
no longer has any value to the community. It just becomes a
personal flame war. The only way to foster an informed, involved,
healthy community is to promote rational discourse over fighting
and attacking each other.
In regards to your actual post, as I said above, we are aware of and working to correct the known problems platoons can create within the matchmaker.
In regards to your actual post, as I said above, we are aware of and working to correct the known problems platoons can create within the matchmaker.
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 22:44:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906812
mp31b30q9, on Mar 07 2013 - 20:28, said: Seriously?!?
Link on message: #3906812
mp31b30q9, on Mar 07 2013 - 20:28, said: Seriously?!?Mugsy_:
I understand you are frustrated but please do your best to communicate in a constructive, civil manner. I think you can look at this thread and see clearly that hostility changes the course of a conversation for the worse. People stop hearing one another and it reduces to bickering and then the thread gets closed because it no longer has any value to the community. It just becomes a personal flame war. The only way to foster an informed, involved, healthy community is to promote rational discourse over fighting and attacking each other.
In regards to your actual post, as I said above, we are aware of and working to correct the known problems platoons can create within the matchmaker.
I understand you are frustrated but please do your best to communicate in a constructive, civil manner. I think you can look at this thread and see clearly that hostility changes the course of a conversation for the worse. People stop hearing one another and it reduces to bickering and then the thread gets closed because it no longer has any value to the community. It just becomes a personal flame war. The only way to foster an informed, involved, healthy community is to promote rational discourse over fighting and attacking each other.
In regards to your actual post, as I said above, we are aware of and working to correct the known problems platoons can create within the matchmaker.
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 22:44:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906812
mp31b30q9, on Mar 07 2013 - 20:28, said: Seriously?!?
Link on message: #3906812
mp31b30q9, on Mar 07 2013 - 20:28, said: Seriously?!?Mugsy_:
I understand you are frustrated but please do your best to communicate in a constructive, civil manner. I think you can look at this thread and see clearly that hostility changes the course of a conversation for the worse. People stop hearing one another and it reduces to bickering and then the thread gets closed because it no longer has any value to the community. It just becomes a personal flame war. The only way to foster an informed, involved, healthy community is to promote rational discourse over fighting and attacking each other.
In regards to your actual post, as I said above, we are aware of and working to correct the known problems platoons can create within the matchmaker.
I understand you are frustrated but please do your best to communicate in a constructive, civil manner. I think you can look at this thread and see clearly that hostility changes the course of a conversation for the worse. People stop hearing one another and it reduces to bickering and then the thread gets closed because it no longer has any value to the community. It just becomes a personal flame war. The only way to foster an informed, involved, healthy community is to promote rational discourse over fighting and attacking each other.
In regards to your actual post, as I said above, we are aware of and working to correct the known problems platoons can create within the matchmaker.
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
07.03.2013 22:41:46
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3906788
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 22:39, said: If acting upon public statements by WG is cheating then
yes. They release the patch notes so you can plan
accordingly.
Link on message: #3906788
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 22:39, said: If acting upon public statements by WG is cheating then
yes. They release the patch notes so you can plan
accordingly.Yoott: patch notes are subject to change until they go LIVE (and even then
they can change them anyways they want... read the EULA next time
instead of just clicking accept)
welcome to online video games... thanks for playing
welcome to online video games... thanks for playing
Yoott
8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
07.03.2013 22:31:17
Subject: 8.4 20pdr HE Mk3 Shell Change
Link on message: #3906721
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 19:35, said: I lost money on this. I will be quitting to play other
games(bf3). You may ask how could you lose
money? The shells were bought for $85 and they could be
sold for $85? Isn't that fine? Isn't that
ok? We'll NO its not. I like many other
tankers had several tanks that are fully researched ready to
upgrade if and when / if we get the money. When I herd
on the forums that i would be able to buy the 83 mm He MK3 i jumped
all over it and sold my fully researched IS and fully researched
T-20 in the hopes that after 8.4 i would be able to get my IS-3 and
a M26 Pershing. Given that the shells were hot fixed to
make it so that I will make $0 on the 25,000 shells I bought i have
to rebuy my tanks at a loss. To make matters worse I
told my friends about the 83 mm He MK3 and how it was going to make
money. A few of them wont even talk to me.
It also the principal of it too. You use silver to rate limit advancement in the game then you realize that people are getting ahead using some complicated chart hooked into the database of profit per round based on average misses to the damage of the shell combined with the tier that its at. You see that the 83 mm He MK3 is making British tank owners money so you deiced to not double no QUADRUPLE the price. Then you realize that people can do simple math and figure out that if shells sell for half the price they are bought at that quadrupling would make people who own the shell money. So you split the difference and ruined me.
Anyways I strong suspect the price will be going up again in 8.5. I hold them until then. I hope you do the right thing so I can continue to play. Also while i don't own Premium because i cant play WOT everyday and I feel using a limited time thing that I cant use every day is a waste, however I have bought gold before. I used it to buy cameo, buy tank slots, and to demount complicated equipment. I tell you this because I don't want you to think that only the dirty free players got screwed over. I'm a customer and I would have likely bought more gold in the future. Anyways I quit until the price of the 83 mm He MK3 sells for $130 like you said it would.
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 22:03, said: It was their mistake and im having to pay for it.
Link on message: #3906721
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 19:35, said: I lost money on this. I will be quitting to play other
games(bf3). You may ask how could you lose
money? The shells were bought for $85 and they could be
sold for $85? Isn't that fine? Isn't that
ok? We'll NO its not. I like many other
tankers had several tanks that are fully researched ready to
upgrade if and when / if we get the money. When I herd
on the forums that i would be able to buy the 83 mm He MK3 i jumped
all over it and sold my fully researched IS and fully researched
T-20 in the hopes that after 8.4 i would be able to get my IS-3 and
a M26 Pershing. Given that the shells were hot fixed to
make it so that I will make $0 on the 25,000 shells I bought i have
to rebuy my tanks at a loss. To make matters worse I
told my friends about the 83 mm He MK3 and how it was going to make
money. A few of them wont even talk to me.It also the principal of it too. You use silver to rate limit advancement in the game then you realize that people are getting ahead using some complicated chart hooked into the database of profit per round based on average misses to the damage of the shell combined with the tier that its at. You see that the 83 mm He MK3 is making British tank owners money so you deiced to not double no QUADRUPLE the price. Then you realize that people can do simple math and figure out that if shells sell for half the price they are bought at that quadrupling would make people who own the shell money. So you split the difference and ruined me.
Anyways I strong suspect the price will be going up again in 8.5. I hold them until then. I hope you do the right thing so I can continue to play. Also while i don't own Premium because i cant play WOT everyday and I feel using a limited time thing that I cant use every day is a waste, however I have bought gold before. I used it to buy cameo, buy tank slots, and to demount complicated equipment. I tell you this because I don't want you to think that only the dirty free players got screwed over. I'm a customer and I would have likely bought more gold in the future. Anyways I quit until the price of the 83 mm He MK3 sells for $130 like you said it would.
Yoott: It was there mistake that they caught and fixed........that is
allowed......
good luck in your other games..
good luck in your other games..
RayZfox, on Mar 07 2013 - 22:03, said: It was their mistake and im having to pay for it.Yoott:
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 21:17:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906176
Link on message: #3906176
Mugsy_: We definitely do not take the matchmaking lightly. We have made
huge leaps and some small hops.
There are technical limitations and tangles which we are working through and around as part of our endless effort to offer the best matchmaking possible. We are aware of the problems our community has brought to our attention, for example, we know that platoons can lead to aberrations in the matchmaker. But the vast majority of battles you find yourself in should feel like a fair fight.
There are technical limitations and tangles which we are working through and around as part of our endless effort to offer the best matchmaking possible. We are aware of the problems our community has brought to our attention, for example, we know that platoons can lead to aberrations in the matchmaker. But the vast majority of battles you find yourself in should feel like a fair fight.
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 21:17:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906176
Link on message: #3906176
Mugsy_: We definitely do not take the matchmaking lightly. We have made
huge leaps and some small hops.
There are technical limitations and tangles which we are working through and around as part of our endless effort to offer the best matchmaking possible. We are aware of the problems our community has brought to our attention, for example, we know that platoons can lead to aberrations in the matchmaker. But the vast majority of battles you find yourself in should feel like a fair fight.
There are technical limitations and tangles which we are working through and around as part of our endless effort to offer the best matchmaking possible. We are aware of the problems our community has brought to our attention, for example, we know that platoons can lead to aberrations in the matchmaker. But the vast majority of battles you find yourself in should feel like a fair fight.
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 21:17:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906176
Link on message: #3906176
Mugsy_: We definitely do not take the matchmaking lightly. We have made
huge leaps and some small hops.
There are technical limitations and tangles which we are working through and around as part of our endless effort to offer the best matchmaking possible. We are aware of the problems our community has brought to our attention, for example, we know that platoons can lead to aberrations in the matchmaker. But the vast majority of battles you find yourself in should feel like a fair fight.
There are technical limitations and tangles which we are working through and around as part of our endless effort to offer the best matchmaking possible. We are aware of the problems our community has brought to our attention, for example, we know that platoons can lead to aberrations in the matchmaker. But the vast majority of battles you find yourself in should feel like a fair fight.
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 21:12:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906122
Calarin, on Mar 07 2013 - 19:05, said: Sorry should have clarified, they don't care what I respectively
have to suggest.
Link on message: #3906122
Calarin, on Mar 07 2013 - 19:05, said: Sorry should have clarified, they don't care what I respectively
have to suggest.Mugsy_: True. 
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 21:12:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906122
Calarin, on Mar 07 2013 - 18:05, said: Sorry should have clarified, they don't care what I respectively
have to suggest.
Link on message: #3906122
Calarin, on Mar 07 2013 - 18:05, said: Sorry should have clarified, they don't care what I respectively
have to suggest.Mugsy_: True. 
Mugsy_
Why does WG not want to improve MM?
07.03.2013 21:12:29
Subject: Why does WG not want to improve MM?
Link on message: #3906122
Calarin, on Mar 07 2013 - 18:05, said: Sorry should have clarified, they don't care what I respectively
have to suggest.
Link on message: #3906122
Calarin, on Mar 07 2013 - 18:05, said: Sorry should have clarified, they don't care what I respectively
have to suggest.Mugsy_: True.
Jewel_Thief
The 8.4 Update is Now Live
07.03.2013 20:43:39
Subject: The 8.4 Update is Now Live
Link on message: #3905905
Link on message: #3905905
Jewel_Thief: For those who mentioned that the download page had an incorrect
size for the "update" file (i.e.: incorrectly stating that the file
was 194 MB): it's been fixed, thanks everyone!
~JT
~JT
Mugsy_
Suggestion to Wargaming
07.03.2013 20:40:57
Subject: Suggestion to Wargaming
Link on message: #3905882
Link on message: #3905882
Mugsy_: Hello,
I know it feels like there hasn't a new map in too long, that is in part because we have been reworking our existing maps. But I can assure you new maps are now being developed and will be implemented, though I do not have a public release date at this time. Also, no worry about the new tanks vs. new maps, those are handled by separate teams.
I know it feels like there hasn't a new map in too long, that is in part because we have been reworking our existing maps. But I can assure you new maps are now being developed and will be implemented, though I do not have a public release date at this time. Also, no worry about the new tanks vs. new maps, those are handled by separate teams.
Mugsy_
Suggestion to Wargaming
07.03.2013 20:40:57
Subject: Suggestion to Wargaming
Link on message: #3905882
Link on message: #3905882
Mugsy_: Hello,
I know it feels like there hasn't a new map in too long, that is in part because we have been reworking our existing maps. But I can assure you new maps are now being developed and will be implemented, though I do not have a public release date at this time. Also, no worry about the new tanks vs. new maps, those are handled by separate teams.
I know it feels like there hasn't a new map in too long, that is in part because we have been reworking our existing maps. But I can assure you new maps are now being developed and will be implemented, though I do not have a public release date at this time. Also, no worry about the new tanks vs. new maps, those are handled by separate teams.
Mugsy_
Suggestion to Wargaming
07.03.2013 20:40:57
Subject: Suggestion to Wargaming
Link on message: #3905882
Link on message: #3905882
Mugsy_: Hello,
I know it feels like there hasn't a new map in too long, that is in part because we have been reworking our existing maps. But I can assure you new maps are now being developed and will be implemented, though I do not have a public release date at this time. Also, no worry about the new tanks vs. new maps, those are handled by separate teams.
I know it feels like there hasn't a new map in too long, that is in part because we have been reworking our existing maps. But I can assure you new maps are now being developed and will be implemented, though I do not have a public release date at this time. Also, no worry about the new tanks vs. new maps, those are handled by separate teams.
Major_Rampage
8.4 Event "Keep Calm & Carry On"
07.03.2013 19:30:52
Subject: 8.4 Event "Keep Calm & Carry On"
Link on message: #3905236
Folterknecht, on Mar 07 2013 - 03:53, said: That s already better than the contest(s) on EU-Server. 
But to make it clear pls answer the following question/scenario:
4+ players (f.e.: 1 solo + platoon of 3) meet in one TS channel and make countdown and end up in the same battle, which is very likely with the small server population u have on NA-Server. They meet at a certain time and place of a map and the solo player, kills the whole platoon. Now how will you be able to recognize such situations from your server logs without replays?
I really doubt that your store the data in every detail for thousands of battles fought on your server. Serb just confirmed that the plan to introduce a server based replay function in the future - for a limited time frame. One battle replay alone clientside is between 300KB and 1.5MB big.
To detect such scam one has to see a replay ... .
Tuxzilla, on Mar 07 2013 - 14:52, said: The EU version of this event is giving the gold prizes to the top
200 players on each tank instead of the top 100 like our version.
luishere, on Mar 07 2013 - 17:54, said: Is there a daily running list of the top 100 so i could see how i
compare after each battle. I'd elike to see how much
improvement i am making in the running. And where do i
click to get to the list?
Link on message: #3905236
Folterknecht, on Mar 07 2013 - 03:53, said: That s already better than the contest(s) on EU-Server. But to make it clear pls answer the following question/scenario:
4+ players (f.e.: 1 solo + platoon of 3) meet in one TS channel and make countdown and end up in the same battle, which is very likely with the small server population u have on NA-Server. They meet at a certain time and place of a map and the solo player, kills the whole platoon. Now how will you be able to recognize such situations from your server logs without replays?
I really doubt that your store the data in every detail for thousands of battles fought on your server. Serb just confirmed that the plan to introduce a server based replay function in the future - for a limited time frame. One battle replay alone clientside is between 300KB and 1.5MB big.
To detect such scam one has to see a replay ... .
Major_Rampage: I can't get into all specifics of what is
tracked, but suffice to say that those who try to game
the system to win this will have their scores
removed. There are many many variables being tracked.
Tuxzilla, on Mar 07 2013 - 14:52, said: The EU version of this event is giving the gold prizes to the top
200 players on each tank instead of the top 100 like our version.Major_Rampage: They also have a more players online. So we are scaling
the events, to keep them similar in scale for all
the servers.
luishere, on Mar 07 2013 - 17:54, said: Is there a daily running list of the top 100 so i could see how i
compare after each battle. I'd elike to see how much
improvement i am making in the running. And where do i
click to get to the list?Major_Rampage: Unfortunately we don't have this option right now.
Реклама | Adv