Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Jewel_Thief
Forum Bans
07.03.2013 19:26:09
Subject: Forum Bans
Link on message: #3905199
Link on message: #3905199
Jewel_Thief: Okay folks... I think this one is done... (http://awesomegifs.c.../dead-horse.gif)
Closing it up.
~JT
Closing it up.
~JT
Captain_Judo
Why Guilty before proven inoccent
07.03.2013 07:01:49
Subject: Why Guilty before proven inoccent
Link on message: #3903088
CBARoughneck, on Mar 07 2013 - 06:34, said: well i ran a league for 3 yrs and when we had a dispute both teams
had to send in replays and screen shots so if your
missing a replay why doesnt the other team provide all their
replays and that will solve the missing replay and prove you played
legit, but like posted above first round they broke the violation
it was over then and there no questions asked so the other battles
dont matter what so ever,
maybe they used gold and you didnt
this blows brother
Link on message: #3903088
CBARoughneck, on Mar 07 2013 - 06:34, said: well i ran a league for 3 yrs and when we had a dispute both teams
had to send in replays and screen shots so if your
missing a replay why doesnt the other team provide all their
replays and that will solve the missing replay and prove you played
legit, but like posted above first round they broke the violation
it was over then and there no questions asked so the other battles
dont matter what so ever, maybe they used gold and you didnt
this blows brother
Captain_Judo: Solid feedback, CBA.
The problem I foresee with "first to break a rule" is that replays aren't time stamped.
And for the record, because it seems this is getting glossed over, the OP ultimately won his appeal and advanced. His grievance is with the process.
The problem I foresee with "first to break a rule" is that replays aren't time stamped.
And for the record, because it seems this is getting glossed over, the OP ultimately won his appeal and advanced. His grievance is with the process.
Captain_Judo
Why Guilty before proven inoccent
07.03.2013 05:32:44
Subject: Why Guilty before proven inoccent
Link on message: #3902577
Joe_B, on Mar 07 2013 - 05:25, said: Well Judo, the proof is there at least for one of the teams to be
DQ'd. As for whether or not that 5th game involved
cheating by both parties... yes that needs to be
determined.... but come on... you can't let one team
slide through by cheating and there being a "technicality" to the
proof. One game of cheating should be enough to DQ.
And people don't come to post stuff on the forums until after WG does something dumb...
If you guys had DQ'd the 4x cheaters, this would have stayed a private matter.
If we come to find that the OP's team cheated in game 5 (the one with no replay) then they get the boot too.
Link on message: #3902577
Joe_B, on Mar 07 2013 - 05:25, said: Well Judo, the proof is there at least for one of the teams to be
DQ'd. As for whether or not that 5th game involved
cheating by both parties... yes that needs to be
determined.... but come on... you can't let one team
slide through by cheating and there being a "technicality" to the
proof. One game of cheating should be enough to DQ.And people don't come to post stuff on the forums until after WG does something dumb...
If you guys had DQ'd the 4x cheaters, this would have stayed a private matter.
If we come to find that the OP's team cheated in game 5 (the one with no replay) then they get the boot too.
Captain_Judo: You have to keep in mind that skirmishes only allow us less than 24
hours to resolve DQ matters.
The OP's opponent was disqualified. Next, the OP simply needed to provide the replay to the missing battle. It's not a tall order, really.
The OP's opponent was disqualified. Next, the OP simply needed to provide the replay to the missing battle. It's not a tall order, really.
Captain_Judo
Why Guilty before proven inoccent
07.03.2013 05:25:40
Subject: Why Guilty before proven inoccent
Link on message: #3902535
Plunky, on Mar 07 2013 - 05:23, said: So, I can cheat in a tourney, and if the other team can't provide
all the replays, tough cookies, and my team wins. Awesome to know
that for future use, thanks!
Link on message: #3902535
Plunky, on Mar 07 2013 - 05:23, said: So, I can cheat in a tourney, and if the other team can't provide
all the replays, tough cookies, and my team wins. Awesome to know
that for future use, thanks!Captain_Judo: Not at all, Plunky. In this case, the cheating team had been
identified. You would still need to provide evidence that you
played by the rules, in all battles, so that you may advance in
their place.
Captain_Judo
Why Guilty before proven inoccent
07.03.2013 05:15:07
Subject: Why Guilty before proven inoccent
Link on message: #3902466
Arrowfoot, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:41, said: I am sure you guys dont want and have rules against makeing
disputes public. I would think for issues of transparence you would
want them in the open proving you have nothing to hide. That issue
aside, he has a very good point, if not made in the best way. If he
has the replayes showing that the other team brought in an over
tier tank even once, then that team should have been disqualified.
If his team had brought in the wrong tanks just once, then the
other team should need to provied the replay showing that. In rare
cases you might need all 5 but this was not one of them.
Please forgive my spelling and have a nice day
Link on message: #3902466
Arrowfoot, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:41, said: I am sure you guys dont want and have rules against makeing
disputes public. I would think for issues of transparence you would
want them in the open proving you have nothing to hide. That issue
aside, he has a very good point, if not made in the best way. If he
has the replayes showing that the other team brought in an over
tier tank even once, then that team should have been disqualified.
If his team had brought in the wrong tanks just once, then the
other team should need to provied the replay showing that. In rare
cases you might need all 5 but this was not one of them.Please forgive my spelling and have a nice day
Captain_Judo: The reason for keeping DQ decisions away from the public forums is
to simply avoid naming, shaming and flaming. As you can imagine,
dialogue between both sides can get heated and it's unnecessary to
highlight any ugly side of such dialogues.
I'd like to leave this thread open for the simple fact that it adds some said transparency to this process.
It's very simple: when you apply for a dispute to disqualify a team, bring all of your replays. Not just the ones that suit you best. But all of your replays.
I'd like to leave this thread open for the simple fact that it adds some said transparency to this process.
It's very simple: when you apply for a dispute to disqualify a team, bring all of your replays. Not just the ones that suit you best. But all of your replays.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
07.03.2013 05:07:20
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3902386
GlM, on Mar 06 2013 - 19:10, said: Just a quick question. how does this tourney work. i have done a
lot of tourneys but this kind of got me confused. So teams who lost
last week go to open division or teams that lose this week go to
Open division. can someone explain this whole thing in a simple
sentence?
Link on message: #3902386
GlM, on Mar 06 2013 - 19:10, said: Just a quick question. how does this tourney work. i have done a
lot of tourneys but this kind of got me confused. So teams who lost
last week go to open division or teams that lose this week go to
Open division. can someone explain this whole thing in a simple
sentence?Captain_Judo: RedPrince nailed it.
I'd also like to add that while teams must be invited to the Major League and Minor League, the "Open League" is open to an unlimited number of teams. Registration for this league will open shortly before the Major League & Minor League qualifiers close.
I'd also like to add that while teams must be invited to the Major League and Minor League, the "Open League" is open to an unlimited number of teams. Registration for this league will open shortly before the Major League & Minor League qualifiers close.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
07.03.2013 05:07:20
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3902386
GlM, on Mar 06 2013 - 18:10, said: Just a quick question. how does this tourney work. i have done a
lot of tourneys but this kind of got me confused. So teams who lost
last week go to open division or teams that lose this week go to
Open division. can someone explain this whole thing in a simple
sentence?
Link on message: #3902386
GlM, on Mar 06 2013 - 18:10, said: Just a quick question. how does this tourney work. i have done a
lot of tourneys but this kind of got me confused. So teams who lost
last week go to open division or teams that lose this week go to
Open division. can someone explain this whole thing in a simple
sentence?Captain_Judo:
RedPrince nailed it.
I'd also like to add that while teams must be invited to the Major League and Minor League, the "Open League" is open to an unlimited number of teams. Registration for this league will open shortly before the Major League & Minor League qualifiers close.
RedPrince nailed it.
I'd also like to add that while teams must be invited to the Major League and Minor League, the "Open League" is open to an unlimited number of teams. Registration for this league will open shortly before the Major League & Minor League qualifiers close.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
07.03.2013 05:07:20
Subject: World of Tanks Championship Series: Spring Season (Qualifiers)
Link on message: #3902386
GlM, on Mar 06 2013 - 18:10, said: Just a quick question. how does this tourney work. i have done a
lot of tourneys but this kind of got me confused. So teams who lost
last week go to open division or teams that lose this week go to
Open division. can someone explain this whole thing in a simple
sentence?
Link on message: #3902386
GlM, on Mar 06 2013 - 18:10, said: Just a quick question. how does this tourney work. i have done a
lot of tourneys but this kind of got me confused. So teams who lost
last week go to open division or teams that lose this week go to
Open division. can someone explain this whole thing in a simple
sentence?Captain_Judo:
RedPrince nailed it.
I'd also like to add that while teams must be invited to the Major League and Minor League, the "Open League" is open to an unlimited number of teams. Registration for this league will open shortly before the Major League & Minor League qualifiers close.
RedPrince nailed it.
I'd also like to add that while teams must be invited to the Major League and Minor League, the "Open League" is open to an unlimited number of teams. Registration for this league will open shortly before the Major League & Minor League qualifiers close.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
07.03.2013 05:03:31
Subject: World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
Link on message: #3902346
Eliminateur, on Mar 06 2013 - 17:24, said: yeah, it was a badly handled turtle/caprush on our part, we broke
the high-HP turtle but at the same time our two resetters failed to
reset the 2nd capper that was collecting points (and they got
killed as they where pretty battered already).
I wonder how does the disqualification works?, i mean, if a team didn't show in week 3 because they knew had no chance, what difference being disqualified would make?.
And i don't think ANY other team that would miss 2 matches in a row had any chance of getting on the top 3 anyway.
So, what's the point of the disq system?, is it for barring entry of those players/teams for future tourneys(which would be welcome btw), or has some team on the "top 3" of a group dropped 2 matches and will be disualified? (will you publish a list of disqualified teams judo?)
Link on message: #3902346
Eliminateur, on Mar 06 2013 - 17:24, said: yeah, it was a badly handled turtle/caprush on our part, we broke
the high-HP turtle but at the same time our two resetters failed to
reset the 2nd capper that was collecting points (and they got
killed as they where pretty battered already).I wonder how does the disqualification works?, i mean, if a team didn't show in week 3 because they knew had no chance, what difference being disqualified would make?.
And i don't think ANY other team that would miss 2 matches in a row had any chance of getting on the top 3 anyway.
So, what's the point of the disq system?, is it for barring entry of those players/teams for future tourneys(which would be welcome btw), or has some team on the "top 3" of a group dropped 2 matches and will be disualified? (will you publish a list of disqualified teams judo?)
Captain_Judo: The DQ system was actually enforced during the 3rd week of Round 1.
Several groups may have noticed that they were automatically
granted a win versus certain teams.
There are no teams, qualified for Round 2, in imminent danger of disqualification due to our technical victory/no-show rule.
There are no teams, qualified for Round 2, in imminent danger of disqualification due to our technical victory/no-show rule.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
07.03.2013 05:03:31
Subject: World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
Link on message: #3902346
Eliminateur, on Mar 06 2013 - 16:24, said: yeah, it was a badly handled turtle/caprush on our part, we broke
the high-HP turtle but at the same time our two resetters failed to
reset the 2nd capper that was collecting points (and they got
killed as they where pretty battered already).
I wonder how does the disqualification works?, i mean, if a team didn't show in week 3 because they knew had no chance, what difference being disqualified would make?.
And i don't think ANY other team that would miss 2 matches in a row had any chance of getting on the top 3 anyway.
So, what's the point of the disq system?, is it for barring entry of those players/teams for future tourneys(which would be welcome btw), or has some team on the "top 3" of a group dropped 2 matches and will be disualified? (will you publish a list of disqualified teams judo?)
Link on message: #3902346
Eliminateur, on Mar 06 2013 - 16:24, said: yeah, it was a badly handled turtle/caprush on our part, we broke
the high-HP turtle but at the same time our two resetters failed to
reset the 2nd capper that was collecting points (and they got
killed as they where pretty battered already).I wonder how does the disqualification works?, i mean, if a team didn't show in week 3 because they knew had no chance, what difference being disqualified would make?.
And i don't think ANY other team that would miss 2 matches in a row had any chance of getting on the top 3 anyway.
So, what's the point of the disq system?, is it for barring entry of those players/teams for future tourneys(which would be welcome btw), or has some team on the "top 3" of a group dropped 2 matches and will be disualified? (will you publish a list of disqualified teams judo?)
Captain_Judo:
The DQ system was actually enforced during the 3rd week of Round 1. Several groups may have noticed that they were automatically granted a win versus certain teams.
There are no teams, qualified for Round 2, in imminent danger of disqualification due to our technical victory/no-show rule.
The DQ system was actually enforced during the 3rd week of Round 1. Several groups may have noticed that they were automatically granted a win versus certain teams.
There are no teams, qualified for Round 2, in imminent danger of disqualification due to our technical victory/no-show rule.
Captain_Judo
World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
07.03.2013 05:03:31
Subject: World of Tanks Classic, Season 2
Link on message: #3902346
Eliminateur, on Mar 06 2013 - 16:24, said: yeah, it was a badly handled turtle/caprush on our part, we broke
the high-HP turtle but at the same time our two resetters failed to
reset the 2nd capper that was collecting points (and they got
killed as they where pretty battered already).
I wonder how does the disqualification works?, i mean, if a team didn't show in week 3 because they knew had no chance, what difference being disqualified would make?.
And i don't think ANY other team that would miss 2 matches in a row had any chance of getting on the top 3 anyway.
So, what's the point of the disq system?, is it for barring entry of those players/teams for future tourneys(which would be welcome btw), or has some team on the "top 3" of a group dropped 2 matches and will be disualified? (will you publish a list of disqualified teams judo?)
Link on message: #3902346
Eliminateur, on Mar 06 2013 - 16:24, said: yeah, it was a badly handled turtle/caprush on our part, we broke
the high-HP turtle but at the same time our two resetters failed to
reset the 2nd capper that was collecting points (and they got
killed as they where pretty battered already).I wonder how does the disqualification works?, i mean, if a team didn't show in week 3 because they knew had no chance, what difference being disqualified would make?.
And i don't think ANY other team that would miss 2 matches in a row had any chance of getting on the top 3 anyway.
So, what's the point of the disq system?, is it for barring entry of those players/teams for future tourneys(which would be welcome btw), or has some team on the "top 3" of a group dropped 2 matches and will be disualified? (will you publish a list of disqualified teams judo?)
Captain_Judo:
The DQ system was actually enforced during the 3rd week of Round 1. Several groups may have noticed that they were automatically granted a win versus certain teams.
There are no teams, qualified for Round 2, in imminent danger of disqualification due to our technical victory/no-show rule.
The DQ system was actually enforced during the 3rd week of Round 1. Several groups may have noticed that they were automatically granted a win versus certain teams.
There are no teams, qualified for Round 2, in imminent danger of disqualification due to our technical victory/no-show rule.
Captain_Judo
Kharkov Challenge
07.03.2013 04:59:02
Subject: Kharkov Challenge
Link on message: #3902314
PTwr, on Mar 05 2013 - 01:36, said: If you ask about maximum including backup players, then I do not
see note about it. But usual amount is 2.
KrimsonHeart, on Mar 06 2013 - 16:05, said: I have a question... With DST(Daylight Savings Time) starting this
weekend, will the start times be affected at all? Quick response
will be appreciated.
Link on message: #3902314
PTwr, on Mar 05 2013 - 01:36, said: If you ask about maximum including backup players, then I do not
see note about it. But usual amount is 2.Captain_Judo: Close Total of 8 players per
team. This information is always available in registration.
Total of 8 players per
team. This information is always available in registration.KrimsonHeart, on Mar 06 2013 - 16:05, said: I have a question... With DST(Daylight Savings Time) starting this
weekend, will the start times be affected at all? Quick response
will be appreciated.Captain_Judo: Daylight Savings Time will not affect the time this tournament
begins in your region; 6:00 PST / 9:00 EST.
Captain_Judo
Kharkov Challenge
07.03.2013 04:59:02
Subject: Kharkov Challenge
Link on message: #3902314
PTwr, on Mar 05 2013 - 00:36, said: If you ask about maximum including backup players, then I do not
see note about it. But usual amount is 2.
KrimsonHeart, on Mar 06 2013 - 15:05, said: I have a question... With DST(Daylight Savings Time) starting this
weekend, will the start times be affected at all? Quick response
will be appreciated.
Link on message: #3902314
PTwr, on Mar 05 2013 - 00:36, said: If you ask about maximum including backup players, then I do not
see note about it. But usual amount is 2.Captain_Judo:
Close
Total of 8 players per
team. This information is always available in registration.
Close
Total of 8 players per
team. This information is always available in registration.KrimsonHeart, on Mar 06 2013 - 15:05, said: I have a question... With DST(Daylight Savings Time) starting this
weekend, will the start times be affected at all? Quick response
will be appreciated.Captain_Judo:
Daylight Savings Time will not affect the time this tournament begins in your region; 6:00 PST / 9:00 EST.
Daylight Savings Time will not affect the time this tournament begins in your region; 6:00 PST / 9:00 EST.
Captain_Judo
Kharkov Challenge
07.03.2013 04:59:02
Subject: Kharkov Challenge
Link on message: #3902314
PTwr, on Mar 05 2013 - 00:36, said: If you ask about maximum including backup players, then I do not
see note about it. But usual amount is 2.
KrimsonHeart, on Mar 06 2013 - 15:05, said: I have a question... With DST(Daylight Savings Time) starting this
weekend, will the start times be affected at all? Quick response
will be appreciated.
Link on message: #3902314
PTwr, on Mar 05 2013 - 00:36, said: If you ask about maximum including backup players, then I do not
see note about it. But usual amount is 2.Captain_Judo:
Close Total of 8 players per
team. This information is always available in registration.
Close
Total of 8 players per
team. This information is always available in registration.KrimsonHeart, on Mar 06 2013 - 15:05, said: I have a question... With DST(Daylight Savings Time) starting this
weekend, will the start times be affected at all? Quick response
will be appreciated.Captain_Judo:
Daylight Savings Time will not affect the time this tournament begins in your region; 6:00 PST / 9:00 EST.
Daylight Savings Time will not affect the time this tournament begins in your region; 6:00 PST / 9:00 EST.
GeneralDirection
A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
07.03.2013 03:21:47
Subject: A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
Link on message: #3901590
whitedragonking, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:16, said: sad this is the best looking map.
really i wish you guys post more maps its been a while
Link on message: #3901590
whitedragonking, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:16, said: sad this is the best looking map.really i wish you guys post more maps its been a while
GeneralDirection: We're about finished with the graphical updates for maps, so you
should start seeing new maps again soon.
GeneralDirection
A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
07.03.2013 03:21:47
Subject: A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
Link on message: #3901590
whitedragonking, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:16, said: sad this is the best looking map.
really i wish you guys post more maps its been a while
Link on message: #3901590
whitedragonking, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:16, said: sad this is the best looking map.really i wish you guys post more maps its been a while
GeneralDirection:
We're about finished with the graphical updates for maps, so you should start seeing new maps again soon.
We're about finished with the graphical updates for maps, so you should start seeing new maps again soon.
GeneralDirection
A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
07.03.2013 03:21:47
Subject: A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
Link on message: #3901590
whitedragonking, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:16, said: sad this is the best looking map.
really i wish you guys post more maps its been a while
Link on message: #3901590
whitedragonking, on Mar 07 2013 - 02:16, said: sad this is the best looking map.really i wish you guys post more maps its been a while
GeneralDirection:
We're about finished with the graphical updates for maps, so you should start seeing new maps again soon.
We're about finished with the graphical updates for maps, so you should start seeing new maps again soon.
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 03:19:54
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3901580
NacMacFeegle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:36, said: any plans for the west coast?
Panzerkompanie, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:48, said: He won't do it. He's been avoiding that thread all day.
Back on topic... I hope you guys come to Washington DC, Baltimore or Philly. I'm within driving distance of all 3 places and would love to stop by and see the Hummer.
manlydangle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:40, said: Stop ignoring us please. We, or at least I, would like to talk this
out with you....
Link on message: #3901580
NacMacFeegle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:36, said: any plans for the west coast?GeneralDirection: Yeah, currently looking at SF during GDC, Seattle during PAX Prime,
San Diego, Portland and Phoenix.
Panzerkompanie, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:48, said: He won't do it. He's been avoiding that thread all day.Back on topic... I hope you guys come to Washington DC, Baltimore or Philly. I'm within driving distance of all 3 places and would love to stop by and see the Hummer.
GeneralDirection: I slated Baltimore for this year too.
manlydangle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:40, said: Stop ignoring us please. We, or at least I, would like to talk this
out with you....GeneralDirection: Not ignoring you, but people told me to stop posting so I did. I'm
happy to discuss it with you in PMs.
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 03:19:54
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3901580
NacMacFeegle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:36, said: any plans for the west coast?
Panzerkompanie, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:48, said: He won't do it. He's been avoiding that thread all day.
Back on topic... I hope you guys come to Washington DC, Baltimore or Philly. I'm within driving distance of all 3 places and would love to stop by and see the Hummer.
manlydangle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:40, said: Stop ignoring us please. We, or at least I, would like to talk this
out with you....
Link on message: #3901580
NacMacFeegle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:36, said: any plans for the west coast?GeneralDirection:
Yeah, currently looking at SF during GDC, Seattle during PAX Prime, San Diego, Portland and Phoenix.
Yeah, currently looking at SF during GDC, Seattle during PAX Prime, San Diego, Portland and Phoenix.
Panzerkompanie, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:48, said: He won't do it. He's been avoiding that thread all day.Back on topic... I hope you guys come to Washington DC, Baltimore or Philly. I'm within driving distance of all 3 places and would love to stop by and see the Hummer.
GeneralDirection:
I slated Baltimore for this year too.
I slated Baltimore for this year too.
manlydangle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:40, said: Stop ignoring us please. We, or at least I, would like to talk this
out with you....GeneralDirection:
Not ignoring you, but people told me to stop posting so I did. I'm happy to discuss it with you in PMs.
Not ignoring you, but people told me to stop posting so I did. I'm happy to discuss it with you in PMs.
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 03:19:54
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3901580
NacMacFeegle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:36, said: any plans for the west coast?
Panzerkompanie, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:48, said: He won't do it. He's been avoiding that thread all day.
Back on topic... I hope you guys come to Washington DC, Baltimore or Philly. I'm within driving distance of all 3 places and would love to stop by and see the Hummer.
manlydangle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:40, said: Stop ignoring us please. We, or at least I, would like to talk this
out with you....
Link on message: #3901580
NacMacFeegle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:36, said: any plans for the west coast?GeneralDirection:
Yeah, currently looking at SF during GDC, Seattle during PAX Prime, San Diego, Portland and Phoenix.
Yeah, currently looking at SF during GDC, Seattle during PAX Prime, San Diego, Portland and Phoenix.
Panzerkompanie, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:48, said: He won't do it. He's been avoiding that thread all day.Back on topic... I hope you guys come to Washington DC, Baltimore or Philly. I'm within driving distance of all 3 places and would love to stop by and see the Hummer.
GeneralDirection:
I slated Baltimore for this year too.
I slated Baltimore for this year too.
manlydangle, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:40, said: Stop ignoring us please. We, or at least I, would like to talk this
out with you....GeneralDirection:
Not ignoring you, but people told me to stop posting so I did. I'm happy to discuss it with you in PMs.
Not ignoring you, but people told me to stop posting so I did. I'm happy to discuss it with you in PMs.
GeneralDirection
A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
07.03.2013 03:15:14
Subject: A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
Link on message: #3901549
reese342, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:56, said: Will the map be implemented in the Training room map list? It's
rather nice.
Link on message: #3901549
reese342, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:56, said: Will the map be implemented in the Training room map list? It's
rather nice.GeneralDirection: Good question. I, too, like the design of the map. I'll ask.
GeneralDirection
A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
07.03.2013 03:15:14
Subject: A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
Link on message: #3901549
reese342, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:56, said: Will the map be implemented in the Training room map list? It's
rather nice.
Link on message: #3901549
reese342, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:56, said: Will the map be implemented in the Training room map list? It's
rather nice.GeneralDirection:
Good question. I, too, like the design of the map. I'll ask.
Good question. I, too, like the design of the map. I'll ask.
GeneralDirection
A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
07.03.2013 03:15:14
Subject: A New Battle Tutorial Premiers with 8.4
Link on message: #3901549
reese342, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:56, said: Will the map be implemented in the Training room map list? It's
rather nice.
Link on message: #3901549
reese342, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:56, said: Will the map be implemented in the Training room map list? It's
rather nice.GeneralDirection:
Good question. I, too, like the design of the map. I'll ask.
Good question. I, too, like the design of the map. I'll ask.
Yoott
FAME!
07.03.2013 02:36:55
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 02:30:47
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3901153
Dukebarry, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:09, said: General
is there going to be a booth at Pax East??
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:17, said: What year was that?
Link on message: #3901153
Dukebarry, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:09, said: Generalis there going to be a booth at Pax East??
GeneralDirection: We're looking to do some stuff at PAX East yeah. We're talking with
partners to set up stations in multiple booths.
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:17, said: What year was that?GeneralDirection: Last year, except Chicago, which was in 2011--the reason I've
scheduled a player event for Chicago later this year (when the
weather sucks a little less).
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 02:30:47
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3901153
Dukebarry, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:09, said: General
is there going to be a booth at Pax East??
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:17, said: What year was that?
Link on message: #3901153
Dukebarry, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:09, said: Generalis there going to be a booth at Pax East??
GeneralDirection:
We're looking to do some stuff at PAX East yeah. We're talking with partners to set up stations in multiple booths.
We're looking to do some stuff at PAX East yeah. We're talking with partners to set up stations in multiple booths.
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:17, said: What year was that?GeneralDirection:
Last year, except Chicago, which was in 2011--the reason I've scheduled a player event for Chicago later this year (when the weather sucks a little less).
Last year, except Chicago, which was in 2011--the reason I've scheduled a player event for Chicago later this year (when the weather sucks a little less).
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 02:30:47
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3901153
Dukebarry, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:09, said: General
is there going to be a booth at Pax East??
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:17, said: What year was that?
Link on message: #3901153
Dukebarry, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:09, said: Generalis there going to be a booth at Pax East??
GeneralDirection:
We're looking to do some stuff at PAX East yeah. We're talking with partners to set up stations in multiple booths.
We're looking to do some stuff at PAX East yeah. We're talking with partners to set up stations in multiple booths.
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 01:17, said: What year was that?GeneralDirection:
Last year, except Chicago, which was in 2011--the reason I've scheduled a player event for Chicago later this year (when the weather sucks a little less).
Last year, except Chicago, which was in 2011--the reason I've scheduled a player event for Chicago later this year (when the weather sucks a little less).
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 02:06:43
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3900946
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:20, said: Let me make a prediction, if it's anything like their player meetup
then they will only be going to places with warm weather and
bikini's, aka... California, Texas, Florida (just to say they came
to the mid-west) and if they really feel like slumming it then
South Carolina (Myrtle Beach, just to say they came to the east
coast) ...NY... forget it, Chicago...not gonna happen,
Canada...don't be silly.
Link on message: #3900946
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:20, said: Let me make a prediction, if it's anything like their player meetup
then they will only be going to places with warm weather and
bikini's, aka... California, Texas, Florida (just to say they came
to the mid-west) and if they really feel like slumming it then
South Carolina (Myrtle Beach, just to say they came to the east
coast) ...NY... forget it, Chicago...not gonna happen,
Canada...don't be silly.GeneralDirection: We've had two player gatherings in Canada, one in New York and one
in Chicago already.
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 02:06:43
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3900946
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:20, said: Let me make a prediction, if it's anything like their player meetup
then they will only be going to places with warm weather and
bikini's, aka... California, Texas, Florida (just to say they came
to the mid-west) and if they really feel like slumming it then
South Carolina (Myrtle Beach, just to say they came to the east
coast) ...NY... forget it, Chicago...not gonna happen,
Canada...don't be silly.
Link on message: #3900946
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:20, said: Let me make a prediction, if it's anything like their player meetup
then they will only be going to places with warm weather and
bikini's, aka... California, Texas, Florida (just to say they came
to the mid-west) and if they really feel like slumming it then
South Carolina (Myrtle Beach, just to say they came to the east
coast) ...NY... forget it, Chicago...not gonna happen,
Canada...don't be silly.GeneralDirection:
We've had two player gatherings in Canada, one in New York and one in Chicago already.
We've had two player gatherings in Canada, one in New York and one in Chicago already.
GeneralDirection
Wargaming Road Tour
07.03.2013 02:06:43
Subject: Wargaming Road Tour
Link on message: #3900946
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:20, said: Let me make a prediction, if it's anything like their player meetup
then they will only be going to places with warm weather and
bikini's, aka... California, Texas, Florida (just to say they came
to the mid-west) and if they really feel like slumming it then
South Carolina (Myrtle Beach, just to say they came to the east
coast) ...NY... forget it, Chicago...not gonna happen,
Canada...don't be silly.
Link on message: #3900946
JT111, on Mar 07 2013 - 00:20, said: Let me make a prediction, if it's anything like their player meetup
then they will only be going to places with warm weather and
bikini's, aka... California, Texas, Florida (just to say they came
to the mid-west) and if they really feel like slumming it then
South Carolina (Myrtle Beach, just to say they came to the east
coast) ...NY... forget it, Chicago...not gonna happen,
Canada...don't be silly.GeneralDirection:
We've had two player gatherings in Canada, one in New York and one in Chicago already.
We've had two player gatherings in Canada, one in New York and one in Chicago already.
Captain_Judo
Why Guilty before proven inoccent
07.03.2013 02:03:13
Subject: Why Guilty before proven inoccent
Link on message: #3900915
Link on message: #3900915
Captain_Judo: For the record, disputes are not to be made public. As stated in
the rules
This was a simple matter of verifying that your team, equally, followed the rules, Gravedigger.
Disputes occur and, I must add, are often handled much more maturely.
This was a simple matter of verifying that your team, equally, followed the rules, Gravedigger.
Disputes occur and, I must add, are often handled much more maturely.
Hypnotik
Westward Expansion Timelapse
07.03.2013 00:20:49
Subject: Westward Expansion Timelapse
Link on message: #3900120
Link on message: #3900120
Hypnotik: Timelapse of the NA Clan Wars event, including bonus payouts.
(best viewed in full HD)
(best viewed in full HD)
Mugsy_
I Prayed To The MM Gods and The Gods Answered My Prayers! :D
06.03.2013 23:50:06
Subject: I Prayed To The MM Gods and The Gods Answered My Prayers! :D
Link on message: #3899918
Link on message: #3899918
Mugsy_: How did you find out about our Gods?
Well done, though. May the Makers of Matches shine down upon you gloriously.
Well done, though. May the Makers of Matches shine down upon you gloriously.
Mugsy_
I Prayed To The MM Gods and The Gods Answered My Prayers! :D
06.03.2013 23:50:06
Subject: I Prayed To The MM Gods and The Gods Answered My Prayers! :D
Link on message: #3899918
Link on message: #3899918
Mugsy_: How did you find out about our Gods?
Well done, though. May the Makers of Matches shine down upon you gloriously.
Well done, though. May the Makers of Matches shine down upon you gloriously.
Mugsy_
I Prayed To The MM Gods and The Gods Answered My Prayers! :D
06.03.2013 23:50:06
Subject: I Prayed To The MM Gods and The Gods Answered My Prayers! :D
Link on message: #3899918
Link on message: #3899918
Mugsy_: How did you find out about our Gods?
Well done, though. May the Makers of Matches shine down upon you gloriously.
Well done, though. May the Makers of Matches shine down upon you gloriously.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
06.03.2013 22:31:23
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3899133
Link on message: #3899133
Captain_Judo: You're jumping to way too many conclusions. Take a deep breath and
check your PM.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
06.03.2013 22:31:23
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3899133
Link on message: #3899133
Captain_Judo: You're jumping to way too many conclusions. Take a deep breath and
check your PM.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
06.03.2013 22:31:23
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3899133
Link on message: #3899133
Captain_Judo: You're jumping to way too many conclusions. Take a deep breath and
check your PM.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
06.03.2013 21:37:13
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3898673
bumpkin, on Mar 05 2013 - 18:12, said: Agree. I think it is a great solution. Good
Job.
If the situation arises again maybe you could have the winning teams from the brackets fight for an additional prize. Sorry getting greedy.
RipleyDH, on Mar 06 2013 - 06:57, said: Well that was a new one for me. My team ended up losing
a 3-2 match against Legion Hispana de la Guardia, and during one of
the matches they accused us of cheating for bringing an SU-100,
KV-1S, and T-50. Their claim was you can only bring one
tier 6 into the match, but they didn't complain in the previous
match in which we brought the KV-1S, Hellcat, and
T-50. Call me crazy, but where's the foul play?
RipleyDH
Link on message: #3898673
bumpkin, on Mar 05 2013 - 18:12, said: Agree. I think it is a great solution. Good
Job. If the situation arises again maybe you could have the winning teams from the brackets fight for an additional prize. Sorry getting greedy.
Captain_Judo: I'm happy to hear this change was well
received
Just keep in mind that we felt compelled to add the additional playoff because there were enough teams (and some left over) for a full, second 64-team playoff.
Just keep in mind that we felt compelled to add the additional playoff because there were enough teams (and some left over) for a full, second 64-team playoff.
RipleyDH, on Mar 06 2013 - 06:57, said: Well that was a new one for me. My team ended up losing
a 3-2 match against Legion Hispana de la Guardia, and during one of
the matches they accused us of cheating for bringing an SU-100,
KV-1S, and T-50. Their claim was you can only bring one
tier 6 into the match, but they didn't complain in the previous
match in which we brought the KV-1S, Hellcat, and
T-50. Call me crazy, but where's the foul play?RipleyDH
Captain_Judo: It's every team's responsibility to familiarize themselves with the
rules. This also works, mentally, to your advantage.
Captain_Judo
Skirmish 10
06.03.2013 21:37:13
Subject: Skirmish 10
Link on message: #3898673
bumpkin, on Mar 05 2013 - 17:12, said: Agree. I think it is a great solution. Good
Job.
If the situation arises again maybe you could have the winning teams from the brackets fight for an additional prize. Sorry getting greedy.
RipleyDH, on Mar 06 2013 - 05:57, said: Well that was a new one for me. My team ended up losing
a 3-2 match against Legion Hispana de la Guardia, and during one of
the matches they accused us of cheating for bringing an SU-100,
KV-1S, and T-50. Their claim was you can only bring one
tier 6 into the match, but they didn't complain in the previous
match in which we brought the KV-1S, Hellcat, and
T-50. Call me crazy, but where's the foul play?
RipleyDH
Link on message: #3898673
bumpkin, on Mar 05 2013 - 17:12, said: Agree. I think it is a great solution. Good
Job. If the situation arises again maybe you could have the winning teams from the brackets fight for an additional prize. Sorry getting greedy.
Captain_Judo:
I'm happy to hear this change was well received
Just keep in mind that we felt compelled to add the additional playoff because there were enough teams (and some left over) for a full, second 64-team playoff.
I'm happy to hear this change was well received
Just keep in mind that we felt compelled to add the additional playoff because there were enough teams (and some left over) for a full, second 64-team playoff.
RipleyDH, on Mar 06 2013 - 05:57, said: Well that was a new one for me. My team ended up losing
a 3-2 match against Legion Hispana de la Guardia, and during one of
the matches they accused us of cheating for bringing an SU-100,
KV-1S, and T-50. Their claim was you can only bring one
tier 6 into the match, but they didn't complain in the previous
match in which we brought the KV-1S, Hellcat, and
T-50. Call me crazy, but where's the foul play?RipleyDH
Captain_Judo:
It's every team's responsibility to familiarize themselves with the rules. This also works, mentally, to your advantage.
It's every team's responsibility to familiarize themselves with the rules. This also works, mentally, to your advantage.
Реклама | Adv