Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why Guilty before proven inoccent

Дата: 07.03.2013 05:32:44
View PostJoe_B, on Mar 07 2013 - 05:25, said: Well Judo, the proof is there at least for one of the teams to be DQ'd.  As for whether or not that 5th game involved cheating by both parties... yes that needs to be determined....  but come on... you can't let one team slide through by cheating and there being a "technicality" to the proof. One game of cheating should be enough to DQ.
And people don't come to post stuff on the forums until after WG does something dumb...
If you guys had DQ'd the 4x cheaters, this would have stayed a private matter.
If we come to find that the OP's team cheated in game 5 (the one with no replay) then they get the boot too.

Captain_Judo: You have to keep in mind that skirmishes only allow us less than 24 hours to resolve DQ matters.
The OP's opponent was disqualified. Next, the OP simply needed to provide the replay to the missing battle. It's not a tall order, really.

Реклама | Adv