Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:54:11
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348507
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:48, said: Got it, can only have fun in ways you dictate and all other fun is
illegal. God forbid we're getting stomped 12-4 and I mess with my
friend so we can at least get some laughs out of an otherwise
garbage match. Its totally comparable to a Sheriff suicide ramming
a scout into a teammate, drowning themselves and calling everybody
baddies, right?
How about 8000 XP? (320 gold value)
How about a day of premium? (250 gold value)
How about 150,000 credits? (375 gold value)
How about a combo: 100,000 credits (250 gold value) and 3000 XP (120 gold value)
So many possibilities.
Link on message: #3348507
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:48, said: Got it, can only have fun in ways you dictate and all other fun is
illegal. God forbid we're getting stomped 12-4 and I mess with my
friend so we can at least get some laughs out of an otherwise
garbage match. Its totally comparable to a Sheriff suicide ramming
a scout into a teammate, drowning themselves and calling everybody
baddies, right?How about 8000 XP? (320 gold value)
How about a day of premium? (250 gold value)
How about 150,000 credits? (375 gold value)
How about a combo: 100,000 credits (250 gold value) and 3000 XP (120 gold value)
So many possibilities.
GeneralDirection: If you've witnessed that behavior then all you have to do is report
it. As you can see from the rules, access to the sheriff accounts
carries a lot of responsibility and it's very actionable if a
sheriff is doing something that will harm the experience of other
players in the battle.
GeneralDirection
8.4 Test Server Release
28.12.2012 09:45:00
Subject: 8.4 Test Server Release
Link on message: #3348475
Link on message: #3348475
GeneralDirection: Let's focus on 8.3 for now. Who knows, maybe we'll have details on
the test server soon.
GeneralDirection
8.4 Test Server Release
28.12.2012 09:45:00
Subject: 8.4 Test Server Release
Link on message: #3348475
Link on message: #3348475
GeneralDirection: Let's focus on 8.3 for now. Who knows, maybe we'll have details on
the test server soon.
GeneralDirection
8.4 Test Server Release
28.12.2012 09:45:00
Subject: 8.4 Test Server Release
Link on message: #3348475
Link on message: #3348475
GeneralDirection: Let's focus on 8.3 for now. Who knows, maybe we'll have details on
the test server soon.
CatStalker
Base flags at half mast
28.12.2012 09:42:28
Subject: Base flags at half mast
Link on message: #3348466
Link on message: #3348466
CatStalker: I don't know for sure, but I'd imagine it would require changes to
the actual maps. If so, an event like this would probably be
excessively labor intensive.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 09:40:44
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348462
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 07:50, said: I got T110E5 on Dec 24th 5 am I bet Im qualified.
I have 2 question
1. will I get notification that Im qualified ? and how u really know ur qualified ?
2. Im bit worried does WG will email you and ask your size and address or they have only 1 size ? 0_o
Link on message: #3348462
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 07:50, said: I got T110E5 on Dec 24th 5 am I bet Im qualified.I have 2 question
1. will I get notification that Im qualified ? and how u really know ur qualified ?
2. Im bit worried does WG will email you and ask your size and address or they have only 1 size ? 0_o
GeneralDirection: 1. We will email you to let you know. In it will be a code to
redeem for the shirt.
2. Size and shipping will take place on the J!NX website once you've redeemed the code.
Details on how to redeem the code will be provided in the email. So please make sure your email is current.
2. Size and shipping will take place on the J!NX website once you've redeemed the code.
Details on how to redeem the code will be provided in the email. So please make sure your email is current.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 09:40:44
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348462
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 07:50, said: I got T110E5 on Dec 24th 5 am I bet Im qualified.
I have 2 question
1. will I get notification that Im qualified ? and how u really know ur qualified ?
2. Im bit worried does WG will email you and ask your size and address or they have only 1 size ? 0_o
Link on message: #3348462
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 07:50, said: I got T110E5 on Dec 24th 5 am I bet Im qualified.I have 2 question
1. will I get notification that Im qualified ? and how u really know ur qualified ?
2. Im bit worried does WG will email you and ask your size and address or they have only 1 size ? 0_o
GeneralDirection: 1. We will email you to let you know. In it will be a code to
redeem for the shirt.
2. Size and shipping will take place on the J!NX website once you've redeemed the code.
Details on how to redeem the code will be provided in the email. So please make sure your email is current.
2. Size and shipping will take place on the J!NX website once you've redeemed the code.
Details on how to redeem the code will be provided in the email. So please make sure your email is current.
GeneralDirection
Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
28.12.2012 09:40:44
Subject: Treads for Threads Campaign Extension
Link on message: #3348462
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 07:50, said: I got T110E5 on Dec 24th 5 am I bet Im qualified.
I have 2 question
1. will I get notification that Im qualified ? and how u really know ur qualified ?
2. Im bit worried does WG will email you and ask your size and address or they have only 1 size ? 0_o
Link on message: #3348462
Moltike, on Dec 28 2012 - 07:50, said: I got T110E5 on Dec 24th 5 am I bet Im qualified.I have 2 question
1. will I get notification that Im qualified ? and how u really know ur qualified ?
2. Im bit worried does WG will email you and ask your size and address or they have only 1 size ? 0_o
GeneralDirection: 1. We will email you to let you know. In it will be a code to
redeem for the shirt.
2. Size and shipping will take place on the J!NX website once you've redeemed the code.
Details on how to redeem the code will be provided in the email. So please make sure your email is current.
2. Size and shipping will take place on the J!NX website once you've redeemed the code.
Details on how to redeem the code will be provided in the email. So please make sure your email is current.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:35:08
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348446
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:17, said: I'll give you the "why not?": Because its a solid system as it
stands, 500 gold for a sheriff is great, I actually liked
platooning with sheriffs so I could push the Sheriff in the line of
enemy fire and give people gold, many laughs were had, the game was
actually more fun.
1250 XP is dumb, isn't as palpable as, say, gold by a long shot. For those who whined: Sure is made people act stupider but when aren't pubs stupid to begin with (plus it actually led to aggressive moves)? Foolish reasoning
Just because its something different doesn't mean its good, tell Rampage to stop Vince Russo'ing the events or he'll end up killing them all.
Link on message: #3348446
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:17, said: I'll give you the "why not?": Because its a solid system as it
stands, 500 gold for a sheriff is great, I actually liked
platooning with sheriffs so I could push the Sheriff in the line of
enemy fire and give people gold, many laughs were had, the game was
actually more fun.1250 XP is dumb, isn't as palpable as, say, gold by a long shot. For those who whined: Sure is made people act stupider but when aren't pubs stupid to begin with (plus it actually led to aggressive moves)? Foolish reasoning
Just because its something different doesn't mean its good, tell Rampage to stop Vince Russo'ing the events or he'll end up killing them all.
GeneralDirection: Understandable, but considering what you just admitted we're
probably going to have to take a look at sheriff platooning and
create more restrictions. Using physics to get another person's
vehicle destroyed is a no-no even if you're platooned.
For feedback on this, what would an acceptable amount be? I will say right out of the gate that it will not be 500 gold worth. This experience isn't something you have to spend gold to convert--it's in addition to the experience you earn normally.
For feedback on this, what would an acceptable amount be? I will say right out of the gate that it will not be 500 gold worth. This experience isn't something you have to spend gold to convert--it's in addition to the experience you earn normally.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:35:08
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348446
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:17, said: I'll give you the "why not?": Because its a solid system as it
stands, 500 gold for a sheriff is great, I actually liked
platooning with sheriffs so I could push the Sheriff in the line of
enemy fire and give people gold, many laughs were had, the game was
actually more fun.
1250 XP is dumb, isn't as palpable as, say, gold by a long shot. For those who whined: Sure is made people act stupider but when aren't pubs stupid to begin with (plus it actually led to aggressive moves)? Foolish reasoning
Just because its something different doesn't mean its good, tell Rampage to stop Vince Russo'ing the events or he'll end up killing them all.
Link on message: #3348446
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:17, said: I'll give you the "why not?": Because its a solid system as it
stands, 500 gold for a sheriff is great, I actually liked
platooning with sheriffs so I could push the Sheriff in the line of
enemy fire and give people gold, many laughs were had, the game was
actually more fun.1250 XP is dumb, isn't as palpable as, say, gold by a long shot. For those who whined: Sure is made people act stupider but when aren't pubs stupid to begin with (plus it actually led to aggressive moves)? Foolish reasoning
Just because its something different doesn't mean its good, tell Rampage to stop Vince Russo'ing the events or he'll end up killing them all.
GeneralDirection: Understandable, but considering what you just admitted we're
probably going to have to take a look at sheriff platooning and
create more restrictions. Using physics to get another person's
vehicle destroyed is a no-no even if you're platooned.
For feedback on this, what would an acceptable amount be? I will say right out of the gate that it will not be 500 gold worth. This experience isn't something you have to spend gold to convert--it's in addition to the experience you earn normally.
For feedback on this, what would an acceptable amount be? I will say right out of the gate that it will not be 500 gold worth. This experience isn't something you have to spend gold to convert--it's in addition to the experience you earn normally.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:35:08
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348446
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:17, said: I'll give you the "why not?": Because its a solid system as it
stands, 500 gold for a sheriff is great, I actually liked
platooning with sheriffs so I could push the Sheriff in the line of
enemy fire and give people gold, many laughs were had, the game was
actually more fun.
1250 XP is dumb, isn't as palpable as, say, gold by a long shot. For those who whined: Sure is made people act stupider but when aren't pubs stupid to begin with (plus it actually led to aggressive moves)? Foolish reasoning
Just because its something different doesn't mean its good, tell Rampage to stop Vince Russo'ing the events or he'll end up killing them all.
Link on message: #3348446
Solono, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:17, said: I'll give you the "why not?": Because its a solid system as it
stands, 500 gold for a sheriff is great, I actually liked
platooning with sheriffs so I could push the Sheriff in the line of
enemy fire and give people gold, many laughs were had, the game was
actually more fun.1250 XP is dumb, isn't as palpable as, say, gold by a long shot. For those who whined: Sure is made people act stupider but when aren't pubs stupid to begin with (plus it actually led to aggressive moves)? Foolish reasoning
Just because its something different doesn't mean its good, tell Rampage to stop Vince Russo'ing the events or he'll end up killing them all.
GeneralDirection: Understandable, but considering what you just admitted we're
probably going to have to take a look at sheriff platooning and
create more restrictions. Using physics to get another person's
vehicle destroyed is a no-no even if you're platooned.
For feedback on this, what would an acceptable amount be? I will say right out of the gate that it will not be 500 gold worth. This experience isn't something you have to spend gold to convert--it's in addition to the experience you earn normally.
For feedback on this, what would an acceptable amount be? I will say right out of the gate that it will not be 500 gold worth. This experience isn't something you have to spend gold to convert--it's in addition to the experience you earn normally.
GeneralDirection
why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
28.12.2012 09:28:29
Subject: why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
Link on message: #3348433
Revanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:24, said: I think having eyes and a IQ above 10 qualifies you to make that
judgement. You don't need a whole lot of games with an
arty mod to see "0 skill mode". Just the breath of
factors they have to take into account alone puts it in the skill
cellar. Arty have to worry about finiding a bush, enemy
scouts, and maybe reposistioning once or twice. Tank
armor? Nope, Weak spots? nope Enemy positioning?
Nope. What gun the enemy tanks have?
Nope. Wheiter you can be penned by the tank your facing
at the angle you are positoned at? Nope. Just is my
circle shrinking anymore? Is the line still green? What does my mod
say is the travel time to that point where on the circle is 20kph?
Fire. then RNG. Any top tier player will
tell you arty hinders their skill while improving bads.
Link on message: #3348433
Revanant, on Dec 28 2012 - 08:24, said: I think having eyes and a IQ above 10 qualifies you to make that
judgement. You don't need a whole lot of games with an
arty mod to see "0 skill mode". Just the breath of
factors they have to take into account alone puts it in the skill
cellar. Arty have to worry about finiding a bush, enemy
scouts, and maybe reposistioning once or twice. Tank
armor? Nope, Weak spots? nope Enemy positioning?
Nope. What gun the enemy tanks have?
Nope. Wheiter you can be penned by the tank your facing
at the angle you are positoned at? Nope. Just is my
circle shrinking anymore? Is the line still green? What does my mod
say is the travel time to that point where on the circle is 20kph?
Fire. then RNG. Any top tier player will
tell you arty hinders their skill while improving bads.GeneralDirection: Sorry, I don't agree that a few SPGs in s battle hinder my skill--I
look at it as another element I have to form a strategy around.
It's a no brainer that a lot of SPGs in a battle is not fun. They're a delicate archetype to balance. Hence the limit.
It's a no brainer that a lot of SPGs in a battle is not fun. They're a delicate archetype to balance. Hence the limit.
GeneralDirection
why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
28.12.2012 09:10:08
Subject: why do people say artie shouldent be in this gam
Link on message: #3348364
Priory_of_Sion, on Dec 28 2012 - 06:07, said: Arty takes little skill if any to use effectively. Being
one-shotted across the map also isn't fun for people who play with
real tanks.
Link on message: #3348364
Priory_of_Sion, on Dec 28 2012 - 06:07, said: Arty takes little skill if any to use effectively. Being
one-shotted across the map also isn't fun for people who play with
real tanks.GeneralDirection: You have less than 50 battles in SPGs, many of them in one we have
admitted is too good (SU-26). I don't think you can properly judge
whether or not SPGs take less skill than other vehicles to play.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:01:15
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348329
Qumefox, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:03, said: I'm only going to reply to this one part because well, the rest is
you coming across as being whiny because you think you're entitled
to something you're not. The reason it seems to you that
I fail to comprehend what your posts mean is because you lost sight
of the original subject of this thread several posts ago trying to
find ways to argue with me while I did not. People, like
yourself, who have bitched and moaned about the way sheriff events
work, have managed to get the rewards lowered
considerably. and before you bring out this quote in
your defense
Read carefully what he said.. and make note of the 'when' in the statement. It in no way says most sheriff events will be gold. WG could never do a gold sheriff event again and GeneralDirection's statement will still be true.
The fact is sheriff rewards have been extremely reduced. And it's completely due to whiners and complainers like yourself.
Link on message: #3348329
Qumefox, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:03, said: I'm only going to reply to this one part because well, the rest is
you coming across as being whiny because you think you're entitled
to something you're not. The reason it seems to you that
I fail to comprehend what your posts mean is because you lost sight
of the original subject of this thread several posts ago trying to
find ways to argue with me while I did not. People, like
yourself, who have bitched and moaned about the way sheriff events
work, have managed to get the rewards lowered
considerably. and before you bring out this quote in
your defenseRead carefully what he said.. and make note of the 'when' in the statement. It in no way says most sheriff events will be gold. WG could never do a gold sheriff event again and GeneralDirection's statement will still be true.
The fact is sheriff rewards have been extremely reduced. And it's completely due to whiners and complainers like yourself.
GeneralDirection: I could tell you that you're wrong and this is nothing more than
Major_Rampage coming to me on December 10th and saying "Hey I'm
thinking about trying something different since gold isn't the only
thing we can give away for sheriff events. What do you think of
January's rewarding free experience to mix things up?" and me
responding with "Sure, why not?"
But I doubt you'd believe me due to the tinfoil blocking reason.
But I doubt you'd believe me due to the tinfoil blocking reason.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:01:15
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348329
Qumefox, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:03, said: I'm only going to reply to this one part because well, the rest is
you coming across as being whiny because you think you're entitled
to something you're not. The reason it seems to you that
I fail to comprehend what your posts mean is because you lost sight
of the original subject of this thread several posts ago trying to
find ways to argue with me while I did not. People, like
yourself, who have bitched and moaned about the way sheriff events
work, have managed to get the rewards lowered
considerably. and before you bring out this quote in
your defense
Read carefully what he said.. and make note of the 'when' in the statement. It in no way says most sheriff events will be gold. WG could never do a gold sheriff event again and GeneralDirection's statement will still be true.
The fact is sheriff rewards have been extremely reduced. And it's completely due to whiners and complainers like yourself.
Link on message: #3348329
Qumefox, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:03, said: I'm only going to reply to this one part because well, the rest is
you coming across as being whiny because you think you're entitled
to something you're not. The reason it seems to you that
I fail to comprehend what your posts mean is because you lost sight
of the original subject of this thread several posts ago trying to
find ways to argue with me while I did not. People, like
yourself, who have bitched and moaned about the way sheriff events
work, have managed to get the rewards lowered
considerably. and before you bring out this quote in
your defenseRead carefully what he said.. and make note of the 'when' in the statement. It in no way says most sheriff events will be gold. WG could never do a gold sheriff event again and GeneralDirection's statement will still be true.
The fact is sheriff rewards have been extremely reduced. And it's completely due to whiners and complainers like yourself.
GeneralDirection: I could tell you that you're wrong and this is nothing more than
Major_Rampage coming to me on December 10th and saying "Hey I'm
thinking about trying something different since gold isn't the only
thing we can give away for sheriff events. What do you think of
January's rewarding free experience to mix things up?" and me
responding with "Sure, why not?"
But I doubt you'd believe me due to the tinfoil blocking reason.
But I doubt you'd believe me due to the tinfoil blocking reason.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
28.12.2012 09:01:15
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3348329
Qumefox, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:03, said: I'm only going to reply to this one part because well, the rest is
you coming across as being whiny because you think you're entitled
to something you're not. The reason it seems to you that
I fail to comprehend what your posts mean is because you lost sight
of the original subject of this thread several posts ago trying to
find ways to argue with me while I did not. People, like
yourself, who have bitched and moaned about the way sheriff events
work, have managed to get the rewards lowered
considerably. and before you bring out this quote in
your defense
Read carefully what he said.. and make note of the 'when' in the statement. It in no way says most sheriff events will be gold. WG could never do a gold sheriff event again and GeneralDirection's statement will still be true.
The fact is sheriff rewards have been extremely reduced. And it's completely due to whiners and complainers like yourself.
Link on message: #3348329
Qumefox, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:03, said: I'm only going to reply to this one part because well, the rest is
you coming across as being whiny because you think you're entitled
to something you're not. The reason it seems to you that
I fail to comprehend what your posts mean is because you lost sight
of the original subject of this thread several posts ago trying to
find ways to argue with me while I did not. People, like
yourself, who have bitched and moaned about the way sheriff events
work, have managed to get the rewards lowered
considerably. and before you bring out this quote in
your defenseRead carefully what he said.. and make note of the 'when' in the statement. It in no way says most sheriff events will be gold. WG could never do a gold sheriff event again and GeneralDirection's statement will still be true.
The fact is sheriff rewards have been extremely reduced. And it's completely due to whiners and complainers like yourself.
GeneralDirection: I could tell you that you're wrong and this is nothing more than
Major_Rampage coming to me on December 10th and saying "Hey I'm
thinking about trying something different since gold isn't the only
thing we can give away for sheriff events. What do you think of
January's rewarding free experience to mix things up?" and me
responding with "Sure, why not?"
But I doubt you'd believe me due to the tinfoil blocking reason.
But I doubt you'd believe me due to the tinfoil blocking reason.
Yoott
Continuation of the SSGS , Guerrilla, Havok and etc thread.
28.12.2012 05:08:45
Subject: Continuation of the SSGS , Guerrilla, Havok and etc thread.
Link on message: #3346982
Link on message: #3346982
Yoott: what happened to the first thread? just curious?
GeneralDirection
Question for WG: Is any personal information included in replay files?
28.12.2012 04:29:18
Subject: Question for WG: Is any personal information included in replay files?
Link on message: #3346735
XMdead, on Dec 28 2012 - 02:20, said: This is a question for WG staff, not for the community to
reply. But I think the answer would be useful to
all:
There is no good/easy way to post replays as a video, only by making the whole file available for download. I have a replay I'd like to make available, but I don't want to risk exposing information that could be used for hacking my account.
Can you confirm that it is perfectly safe to share a replay file with others?
Link on message: #3346735
XMdead, on Dec 28 2012 - 02:20, said: This is a question for WG staff, not for the community to
reply. But I think the answer would be useful to
all:There is no good/easy way to post replays as a video, only by making the whole file available for download. I have a replay I'd like to make available, but I don't want to risk exposing information that could be used for hacking my account.
Can you confirm that it is perfectly safe to share a replay file with others?
GeneralDirection: No personal information (outside of your player name) is included
in the replay.
GeneralDirection
Question for WG: Is any personal information included in replay files?
28.12.2012 04:29:18
Subject: Question for WG: Is any personal information included in replay files?
Link on message: #3346735
XMdead, on Dec 28 2012 - 02:20, said: This is a question for WG staff, not for the community to
reply. But I think the answer would be useful to
all:
There is no good/easy way to post replays as a video, only by making the whole file available for download. I have a replay I'd like to make available, but I don't want to risk exposing information that could be used for hacking my account.
Can you confirm that it is perfectly safe to share a replay file with others?
Link on message: #3346735
XMdead, on Dec 28 2012 - 02:20, said: This is a question for WG staff, not for the community to
reply. But I think the answer would be useful to
all:There is no good/easy way to post replays as a video, only by making the whole file available for download. I have a replay I'd like to make available, but I don't want to risk exposing information that could be used for hacking my account.
Can you confirm that it is perfectly safe to share a replay file with others?
GeneralDirection: No personal information (outside of your player name) is included
in the replay.
GeneralDirection
Question for WG: Is any personal information included in replay files?
28.12.2012 04:29:18
Subject: Question for WG: Is any personal information included in replay files?
Link on message: #3346735
XMdead, on Dec 28 2012 - 02:20, said: This is a question for WG staff, not for the community to
reply. But I think the answer would be useful to
all:
There is no good/easy way to post replays as a video, only by making the whole file available for download. I have a replay I'd like to make available, but I don't want to risk exposing information that could be used for hacking my account.
Can you confirm that it is perfectly safe to share a replay file with others?
Link on message: #3346735
XMdead, on Dec 28 2012 - 02:20, said: This is a question for WG staff, not for the community to
reply. But I think the answer would be useful to
all:There is no good/easy way to post replays as a video, only by making the whole file available for download. I have a replay I'd like to make available, but I don't want to risk exposing information that could be used for hacking my account.
Can you confirm that it is perfectly safe to share a replay file with others?
GeneralDirection: No personal information (outside of your player name) is included
in the replay.
Yoott
Average player LF casual clan
28.12.2012 01:51:21
Subject: Average player LF casual clan
Link on message: #3345736
Link on message: #3345736
Yoott: http://worldoftanks....t_order_by=role
Please stop by and check us out or send me a pm for more info...
we platoon all day, run tourneys and TC's... building the tiers for CW...... we have some enlisted and some retired military
Please stop by and check us out or send me a pm for more info...
we platoon all day, run tourneys and TC's... building the tiers for CW...... we have some enlisted and some retired military
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 01:48:32
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345715
perlfreak, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:44, said: Trace my IP.
I hear India has alot of programmers in your price/quality range.
Edit: That was so mean of me. I'm probably going to be stuck doing something stupid all next week now for Karma payback.
Link on message: #3345715
perlfreak, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:44, said: Trace my IP.I hear India has alot of programmers in your price/quality range.
Edit: That was so mean of me. I'm probably going to be stuck doing something stupid all next week now for Karma payback.
GeneralDirection: It probably won't be posting on the forum.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 01:48:32
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345715
perlfreak, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:44, said: Trace my IP.
I hear India has alot of programmers in your price/quality range.
Edit: That was so mean of me. I'm probably going to be stuck doing something stupid all next week now for Karma payback.
Link on message: #3345715
perlfreak, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:44, said: Trace my IP.I hear India has alot of programmers in your price/quality range.
Edit: That was so mean of me. I'm probably going to be stuck doing something stupid all next week now for Karma payback.
GeneralDirection: It probably won't be posting on the forum.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 01:48:32
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345715
perlfreak, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:44, said: Trace my IP.
I hear India has alot of programmers in your price/quality range.
Edit: That was so mean of me. I'm probably going to be stuck doing something stupid all next week now for Karma payback.
Link on message: #3345715
perlfreak, on Dec 28 2012 - 00:44, said: Trace my IP.I hear India has alot of programmers in your price/quality range.
Edit: That was so mean of me. I'm probably going to be stuck doing something stupid all next week now for Karma payback.
GeneralDirection: It probably won't be posting on the forum.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 01:11:41
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345531
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:07, said: Oh wait what? I'm a programmer. Matchmaking for this
game would be among the easiest things I've done in years.
Link on message: #3345531
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:07, said: Oh wait what? I'm a programmer. Matchmaking for this
game would be among the easiest things I've done in years.GeneralDirection: Well, we're hiring programmers. 
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 01:11:41
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345531
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:07, said: Oh wait what? I'm a programmer. Matchmaking for this
game would be among the easiest things I've done in years.
Link on message: #3345531
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:07, said: Oh wait what? I'm a programmer. Matchmaking for this
game would be among the easiest things I've done in years.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 01:11:41
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345531
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:07, said: Oh wait what? I'm a programmer. Matchmaking for this
game would be among the easiest things I've done in years.
Link on message: #3345531
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 23:07, said: Oh wait what? I'm a programmer. Matchmaking for this
game would be among the easiest things I've done in years.GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 00:00:16
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345065
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:45, said: Sorry, but there is no way in hell the 2nd paragraph has anything
to do with the first.
Link on message: #3345065
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:45, said: Sorry, but there is no way in hell the 2nd paragraph has anything
to do with the first.GeneralDirection: Yeah, it does. Want to take a guess at one of the technical issues?
The second paragraph is one of them.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 00:00:16
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345065
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:45, said: Sorry, but there is no way in hell the 2nd paragraph has anything
to do with the first.
Link on message: #3345065
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:45, said: Sorry, but there is no way in hell the 2nd paragraph has anything
to do with the first.GeneralDirection: Yeah, it does. Want to take a guess at one of the technical issues?
The second paragraph is one of them.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
28.12.2012 00:00:16
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3345065
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:45, said: Sorry, but there is no way in hell the 2nd paragraph has anything
to do with the first.
Link on message: #3345065
perlfreak, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:45, said: Sorry, but there is no way in hell the 2nd paragraph has anything
to do with the first.GeneralDirection: Yeah, it does. Want to take a guess at one of the technical issues?
The second paragraph is one of them.
Hypnotik
Offer: Small clans break up and join Hawks
27.12.2012 23:47:21
Subject: Offer: Small clans break up and join Hawks
Link on message: #3344964
CzechMonster, on Dec 27 2012 - 21:11, said: If your name was "AsianGurlTanker" and your stats were tad bit
better I would talk FORGE Leadership into disbanding however that's
not the case thus we will have to suffer the Gold Farming for
another year or so.
Link on message: #3344964
CzechMonster, on Dec 27 2012 - 21:11, said: If your name was "AsianGurlTanker" and your stats were tad bit
better I would talk FORGE Leadership into disbanding however that's
not the case thus we will have to suffer the Gold Farming for
another year or so.Hypnotik: I'd only have worked on getting them to do so if it was
'AZNBoiTanker'
Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
27.12.2012 22:31:13
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3344342
Solowingz, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:17, said: So where is my gold mate? lol just wondering
Link on message: #3344342
Solowingz, on Dec 27 2012 - 22:17, said: So where is my gold mate? lol just wonderingCaptain_Judo: It's in the mail :P
Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
27.12.2012 22:31:13
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3344342
Solowingz, on Dec 27 2012 - 21:17, said: So where is my gold mate? lol just wondering
Link on message: #3344342
Solowingz, on Dec 27 2012 - 21:17, said: So where is my gold mate? lol just wonderingCaptain_Judo:
It's in the mail :P
It's in the mail :P
Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
27.12.2012 21:49:22
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3343894
Beasts_of_the_East, on Dec 27 2012 - 21:34, said: Is this 10 player roster active this week? Cause in the description
of the scrimmage it now says a minimum of 7 players, but no maximum
is listed.
Link on message: #3343894
Beasts_of_the_East, on Dec 27 2012 - 21:34, said: Is this 10 player roster active this week? Cause in the description
of the scrimmage it now says a minimum of 7 players, but no maximum
is listed.Captain_Judo: Yes, the maximum is currently set to allow 10 players. Hope this
helps alleviate absent players.
Captain_Judo
Weekend Scrimmages
27.12.2012 21:49:22
Subject: Weekend Scrimmages
Link on message: #3343894
Beasts_of_the_East, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:34, said: Is this 10 player roster active this week? Cause in the description
of the scrimmage it now says a minimum of 7 players, but no maximum
is listed.
Link on message: #3343894
Beasts_of_the_East, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:34, said: Is this 10 player roster active this week? Cause in the description
of the scrimmage it now says a minimum of 7 players, but no maximum
is listed.Captain_Judo:
Yes, the maximum is currently set to allow 10 players. Hope this helps alleviate absent players.
Yes, the maximum is currently set to allow 10 players. Hope this helps alleviate absent players.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
27.12.2012 21:33:14
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3343732
GENPATT0N, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:29, said: WG is a little late on the uptake, yes this is a good start but
getting 5 arty per side is what I get in a average match on a daily
bases so here is how I see it.
Bad idea: already get 5 per side on average
Good idea: no more GIGA ARTY PARTIES <-- Garbad is that much more happy but still no cigar.
Alternate: drop it to 3 per side so teams have those 2 extra heavies TD's and etc
what's next a suicide attempt at "fixing MM"? oh nope just working as intended.
Link on message: #3343732
GENPATT0N, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:29, said: WG is a little late on the uptake, yes this is a good start but
getting 5 arty per side is what I get in a average match on a daily
bases so here is how I see it.Bad idea: already get 5 per side on average
Good idea: no more GIGA ARTY PARTIES <-- Garbad is that much more happy but still no cigar.
Alternate: drop it to 3 per side so teams have those 2 extra heavies TD's and etc
what's next a suicide attempt at "fixing MM"? oh nope just working as intended.
GeneralDirection: There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap
lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able
to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to
with the way the matchmaker works.
Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.
Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
27.12.2012 21:33:14
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3343732
GENPATT0N, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:29, said: WG is a little late on the uptake, yes this is a good start but
getting 5 arty per side is what I get in a average match on a daily
bases so here is how I see it.
Bad idea: already get 5 per side on average
Good idea: no more GIGA ARTY PARTIES <-- Garbad is that much more happy but still no cigar.
Alternate: drop it to 3 per side so teams have those 2 extra heavies TD's and etc
what's next a suicide attempt at "fixing MM"? oh nope just working as intended.
Link on message: #3343732
GENPATT0N, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:29, said: WG is a little late on the uptake, yes this is a good start but
getting 5 arty per side is what I get in a average match on a daily
bases so here is how I see it.Bad idea: already get 5 per side on average
Good idea: no more GIGA ARTY PARTIES <-- Garbad is that much more happy but still no cigar.
Alternate: drop it to 3 per side so teams have those 2 extra heavies TD's and etc
what's next a suicide attempt at "fixing MM"? oh nope just working as intended.
GeneralDirection:
There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to with the way the matchmaker works.
Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.
There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to with the way the matchmaker works.
Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.
GeneralDirection
failing to understand WG's reasoning
27.12.2012 21:33:14
Subject: failing to understand WG's reasoning
Link on message: #3343732
GENPATT0N, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:29, said: WG is a little late on the uptake, yes this is a good start but
getting 5 arty per side is what I get in a average match on a daily
bases so here is how I see it.
Bad idea: already get 5 per side on average
Good idea: no more GIGA ARTY PARTIES <-- Garbad is that much more happy but still no cigar.
Alternate: drop it to 3 per side so teams have those 2 extra heavies TD's and etc
what's next a suicide attempt at "fixing MM"? oh nope just working as intended.
Link on message: #3343732
GENPATT0N, on Dec 27 2012 - 20:29, said: WG is a little late on the uptake, yes this is a good start but
getting 5 arty per side is what I get in a average match on a daily
bases so here is how I see it.Bad idea: already get 5 per side on average
Good idea: no more GIGA ARTY PARTIES <-- Garbad is that much more happy but still no cigar.
Alternate: drop it to 3 per side so teams have those 2 extra heavies TD's and etc
what's next a suicide attempt at "fixing MM"? oh nope just working as intended.
GeneralDirection:
There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to with the way the matchmaker works.
Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.
There are a bevy of technical issues that spring up with a cap lower than 5. Once we introduce tier 9 and 10 SPGs we might be able to lower the cap, but right now 5 is the lowest it can be set to with the way the matchmaker works.
Unless you want to get into battles with 12 SPGs on one team and none on the other.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
27.12.2012 21:17:25
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3343609
Link on message: #3343609
GeneralDirection: I just want to go ahead and nip this in the bud by stating that
when the sheriff events reward gold, we still intend for it to be
500.
GeneralDirection
Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
27.12.2012 21:17:25
Subject: Who killed the golden goose? Sheriff bonus nerfed.
Link on message: #3343609
Link on message: #3343609
GeneralDirection: I just want to go ahead and nip this in the bud by stating that
when the sheriff events reward gold, we still intend for it to be
500.
Реклама | Adv