Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line
Link on message: #12846351
Elite_Camper, on Jun 06 2021 - 03:22, said: Leo PTA moving dispersion got nerfed. It's kind of like
Charioteer now - as soon as you start moving the bloom is massive.
Link on message: #12846351

Draschel: Bit of an exaggeration. Charioteer and Skorpion are pretty
bad at this. But even nerfed PTA can mount stabilizer, and the
numbers are still better. More like an AMX CDC
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12846350
Avalon304, on Jun 06 2021 - 02:47, said: In the current system, even if you hit the track from the
direct front you will still do damage to the tank. In the new
system it wont.
Link on message: #12846350

Draschel: Depends. A T92 light tank shooting puny HE shells
at.....say an IS7 track? Probably not. But 60TP doing it?
Absolutely. I'd say typical HE damage shells in tiers 9-10, average
about 420-640 have a reasonable chance to almost always deal
damage. Except for alot of the lights that still use 90s dealing
320.
Subject: Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line
Link on message: #12846221
Link on message: #12846221
Draschel: what are you doing that you place yourself in that position, that
normally isn't open to shoot at 99 out of 100 times????Just about
every tank has that weakness. E50M not excluded
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12846147
TastyPastry, on Jun 05 2021 - 23:22, said: I don't know what you two are arguing about, but this is
just demonstrably false. You think you'll take zero damage from a
4005 hitting you with HE in the track?
Link on message: #12846147

Draschel: lolWho said anything about FV being what is necessary?A
simple SU130PM shooting HE into the tracks from the side probably
enough to do 100+
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12846141
Link on message: #12846141
Draschel: I don't know what planet you are on, what game you are playing, but
it isn't world of tanks. That is not the current
system. Moderate powered HE shells coming from Chieftain, or
113/IS4 will still damage tanks into the tracks at ridiculous
angle, even things like Maus, or Type 5, or Badger. Not 10 for 10,
but I'd say over 50%. Good damage, hell no but hits over 100 take
place. And these are the worse of aimed shots. Tanks like Maus,
IS7, 277 HE is even stronger, and 200 damage shots aren't
unheard of.If you are using a tank like 60 TP or 110E4, you can hit
a gun tip pretty much 2m away and still deal 100+
damage. Maybe not against an enemy like Type 5.If you are testing
with extremely low powered HE shells like T100LT, maybe I can
see 0 with most results now. You shouldn't
be derping heavily armored tanks. This is a free pass, to
counter position. This is playing bad, and having a crutch to
assist you in getting outplayed at the moment. This is get out of
jail card. But the option should always be open, for lighter
low tier vehicles to damage top ones, even if 10-20 HP. The target
maybe on cap, and a reset necessary. The target may have 2HP left.
Utility, not dumb broken mechanics.
Subject: Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line
Link on message: #12846114
Link on message: #12846114
Draschel: what overmatches E50 in the side? It is the same armor as
E50M, 80mm????? The hull changes are very slight.E50
has had many buffs over the years. It is much better than it used
to be for sure. E50M needs more help.
Subject: Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line
Link on message: #12846058
_Red_Saaryn_, on Jun 05 2021 - 15:59, said: The panther has no armor. That's why it is used as a sniper. Or,
are you telling me that someone with 135 alpha/198 pen will go
front lines against t9 and survive? The only place in which the
tank would be considered to have armor is when this faces t5.
And yes leopard line has slow tanks, not tog slow but slow
to accelerate. It is useless to have 55km max speed in the Indien
if you will take a lot of time (if the terrains is on your side) to
reach max speed.
Link on message: #12846058

Draschel: I did not say the panther was an armored tank. Far from it. I
just said, as a tier VII medium, the armor is more or less fine.
Decently angled, the armor can get to 150mm effective, which
reliably bounces lots of tier 6-7 meds and lights. In addition,
panther will avoid most 120-122mm over match attempts because most
of its armor is 50mm or higher, and is reliability thick enough
that HE shells from enemies like Excalibur, OI, KV2, SU152 will not
penetrate. While, this is not front line usage armor unless you are
in tier 5-7 battles as top of the tree, it does have its uses.
Certainly more than Leopard and Leo PTA I finished the indien
panzer using the stock engine all the way through in front lines,
because you can save experience as PTA unlocks the engine free. And
you are right, it was slow. But after the Mutz and Indien Panzer
buffs, indien panzer gained 40 horsepower, and when I take it out
in skirmishes, with the top engine it is noticeably quicker. And
certainly no longer a slug or snail. Is it progetto or LIS or STA2
fast? Hell no, but compares passably pretty much to most tier 8
mediums in tech tree. When you said you were unaware of tech tree
changes in the lines, are you also unaware of Indien Panzer
mobility buff, by chance? Have you played it since? E50M isn't
a great tank. I am not disputing that. I think it is one of the
weakest tier 10 mediums. It has low DPM, no camo, too large and
clunky. But it isn't a glass cannon. Centre of mass shot can hit
its gun mantlet or upper hull, and it is like hitting E75.
390 isn't low alpha, because Action X, M60, M48A, AMX30B all do the
same, and 400 alpha heavy tanks with 120mm as well. The problem is
the DPM, which is low.
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12846052
Link on message: #12846052
Draschel: Take a light tank, like LTTB or Senlac. And shoot Type 5 in the
front or IS7 turret, dead on in training rooms but not into tracks,
gun, or gun shield. Right now, 75% of the time you are going to get
0-damage roll because of the armor thickness, and such small bore
HE radius, and low base damage. But with the planned 1.13 changes,
the same test will actually yield consistent very low damage rolls
instead, like 20-30. So instead of the inconsistency,
unreliability, of 10 tallied 8 shots dealing 0,
1 dealing 50, and 1 dealing 100.....You get consistency. And
consistency is great for utility, such as defeating a 5 HP enemy
with great guarantee, cap reset, and for even light tanks with puny
bore guns to do something. And better yet, this requires
aiming. Because if you hit tracks, you can deal 0. Hit the gun
shield, you can deal 0. And the added benefit, aiming even opens up
opportunity for new found penetrations, as higher penetrating HE
shells can pass through 5mm side skirt like on Schmulturm or Skoda
T50, and hit the weak 30-40mm side armor after, and still easily
penetrate. These HE changes are what the game needs.
They are nice.
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12846049
Link on message: #12846049
Draschel: Well, he would be doing -more than- he would, in the sceario
with the E75 I showed, if AP, APCR were used. Very likely. And that
is what pisses people off most about HE. A broken mechanic that
does not require aiming. WG is getting rid of it.
Slowly, it has been a steady path over years. HE re-work from
radius to line-of-sight sphere. Buffing spall liner, buffing large
med kit. Arty rework and nerf. Type 5 nerf.
HE splash drop off. Added spaced armor and thickening tank armor in
general. And now here we go again, another HE nerf. Sooner or
later, HE will be to the point where it is strictly utility. And
importantly requires aiming.
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12845809
Edselman, on Jun 05 2021 - 07:53, said: If you come across an E4 doing that, why complain? The E4
has the standard penetration to get through most things without
much issue, if he is spamming HE at you, he will probably be doing
less damage overall than if he was aiming with AP and spamming
gold. That's why I don't think they should be messing
with HE, turret monsters like the Chieftain and most high tier
Russian heavies (and some meds) have really strong turrets that
only HE can work against in some cases.
Link on message: #12845809

Draschel: Most of the time, I do not complain. I cringe. However, it is
certainly complaint worthy, when the person even unknowingly, derps
around in a broken fashion, dealing crap he shouldn't, not
even with 420 HEAT pen from old 268Take a look, it is quite common.
Big reason why Type 5 was nerfed, and a big reason why HE is being
changed.https://ibb.co/YjZwVKRNo, the E75 shouldn't be
invulnerable. But he shouldn't either be taking 400-500 damage. And
the damage shouldn't be from the edge of his tank tracks, either.So
HE is being changed. Into utility, you don't want to pay for
premium and get the chance to deal 750? Well, no cheap seats no
aimed shot hitting tracks dealing 400, either.You want to do that
crap, well do it, but instead settle for 150 now. Or hit his
tracks, and gun mantle, and deal a fat
zero.
Subject: Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line
Link on message: #12845808
_Red_Saaryn_, on Jun 05 2021 - 05:02, said: Leopard has the sniper meds
Link on message: #12845808

Draschel: You should have stopped your post there. The rest is rife
with errors. Panther has acceptable armor for where it is. It
is also not the leopard line mediumLeopard line isn't slow. In fact
the only real slow stinker out of all German med is Panther IIE50
and E50M are not slightly armored glass cannons. Their alpha of 390
is standard.
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12845770
Link on message: #12845770
Draschel: By saying crutch, a person very likely means, leaning on something.
By saying training wheels, it is meant using an assisting aid, to
help you do something.So, in the example provided, the person isn't
taking the time to deal expected damage. Rather is taking a
no-skilled approach to aim in the direction, for contact rather
than precision, in the hopes of dealing any sort of damage rather
than 750. This annoys everyone, the person who has superior
position and is ready to fire at the person poking to fire, who is
positioned defensively, who can better use armor but instead the
armor is negated by HE, and good players too - who see
the opportunity as wasted to deal 30% damage instead of
100. Shooting a hull down tank is situational. If you
have absolutely, 9 times of 10 nothing else to do, or are too far
away for provided assistance elsewhere on the map - HE
into something hulldown can work. For instance, Jag Panzer E100 is
too slow to go anywhere fast, or T95 - as such no
problem spamming the turret of IS7 or Chieftain with HE for
300-400. That opportunity cost can be afforded. But even a medium
tank like Chimera or Ravioli, shouldn't be wasting time to deal a
75 damage HE hit, as even they can be utilized somewhere else more
effectively. Not to mention the return risk. Oh, no one
is mentioning or means HE penetrations. Different altogether.
Subject: 1st Post Is A replay
Link on message: #12845760
Darkwolf3802, on Jun 04 2021 - 19:29, said: Well now this is where I beg to differ. How many matches are
absolute squash matches one way or another in wot? Skill plays a
MAJOR part and when you have a bad team you lose no matter your own
skill, cuz its a team game. If teams were actually consistently
balanced my win rate would be decent instead of what it is. My
video also is proof that solo skill wont win you a team game.
Link on message: #12845760

TeriyakiTanker:
I only play solo and I am relatively successful at this game. I would highly suggest you fix your attitude because the game isn’t going to change. The makers want you to get the win rate you earn and not be carried to an inflated win rate. Doesn’t matter if you, me, or anyone else agrees or disagrees, they aren’t going to change it. A lot of players who know more about statistics and MM in general believe blowouts are much more a product of the game being single elimination as compared to the MM being skill neutral. Don’t know if they are right but it makes sense.
I only play solo and I am relatively successful at this game. I would highly suggest you fix your attitude because the game isn’t going to change. The makers want you to get the win rate you earn and not be carried to an inflated win rate. Doesn’t matter if you, me, or anyone else agrees or disagrees, they aren’t going to change it. A lot of players who know more about statistics and MM in general believe blowouts are much more a product of the game being single elimination as compared to the MM being skill neutral. Don’t know if they are right but it makes sense.
Subject: HE isn't the problem, gold is
Link on message: #12845745
Alphatankers, on Jun 05 2021 - 02:20, said: I use HE in the t110 e4 when brawling. I do this because the tank
speed, traverse speed and aim time are so bad that by the time I
aim for a weak spot in a brawl I have eaten a shell and my opponent
has retreated behind hard cover. HE allows me to shoot without
fully exposing and shoot without fully aiming reducing my exposure
time. The HE rework is going to hard nerf some tanks and buff
others.
Link on message: #12845745

Draschel: This is an example, of what is all bad about HE. This is an
example, of HE as a crutch, training wheels HE, rather than using
it clutch. As in proper utility. This exact reason, is why
people hate Sheridan and both FV, why people Hate Fochs 155 running
3xHE, why people hate OI and JV2, why people hate Type
5. And arty.Not really aiming in, not caring where you hit
the enemy, not caring about dealing normal damage - but rather
dealing any damage, not caring about defensive stance of the
enemy. Etc.
Subject: The reason why people think this game is rigged
Link on message: #12845735
VooDooKobra, on Jun 05 2021 - 02:17, said: can you link me where they admit that? love to see it
Link on message: #12845735

DeviouslyCursed: Oh no, he's going to link the patent because he doesn't
understand it. 100% guarantee.
Subject: Russians are
Link on message: #12845733
TheJeep1, on Jun 03 2021 - 17:56, said: I think it's funny some of you can't wait to use expressions like
"tin foil" and "delusional", as if you're part of some cool kids
club. War Gaming is a company, companies are, by
design, set up to show maximum profitability. To sit and say
War Gaming has been forthcoming with everything they do to the
game, as in 100%, is naive and just shows off your lack of
understanding about a great many things. I have put forth a
question 3 times now. I honestly do not know the correct
answer, but not a single one of you "Justice/Fairness Troopers" has
touched it. So I will ask it again. The Panzer 4h vrs
the Panzer 4h Ankou. Why, when equipped the exact same way
does the Pz4h Ankou have a better survivability rating? Maybe
there is something I've not noticed or read yet....could be, or
maybe it's because it has a hidden modifier that WG has decided to
only show in it's over all rating. Perceived Fairness:
This is really the only thing WG has to worry about among it's
player base. It's real objective however is to make a profit,
as in, maximum profit. Hidden tweaks to various things are
not only good for the game they are good for profits too.
But there is nothing "Rigged" about it, it's just part of the same
game we all play.
Link on message: #12845733

DeviouslyCursed: Could simply be an error somewhere. I personally don't use
their comparison tool at all so have no experience with it. My
question to you: if WG has some sort of value that makes the Ankou
better and their goal is to make a profit, why is the value hidden?
Doesn't that make the the whole point of making it better for more
sales kind of pointless if no one knows about it?
Subject: Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line
Link on message: #12845725
Link on message: #12845725
Draschel: I will start with T7, because no one cares about fodder
lowbies Panther has a powerful gun that can penetrate
any enemy it faces, has fair DPM, .....but has low alpha damage
with the gun, traversing the turret spoils gun handling, and bad
camo value.VK3002 has much more maneuverability and mobility. Over
25% better camo available. Better DPM, but VK will have lots of
trouble penetrating tough 8-9 even with APCR Panther II has
better gun control, better DPM, better alpha damage, decent health
pool, more view range. But is slow, Indien panzer itself isn't
fast.....but panther II is even slower.Indien panzer has slightly
better gun depression, slightly more useful armor, slightly more
mobility, and has good high explosive penetration. E50
definitely has solid armor in defensible locations, and is a tier 7
bully. This is something Leo PTA can't ever do, basically. It is
also a more destructive rammer, and takes collisions much better
than PTA does. E50 has more DPM, but can have more difficulty
penetrating tier 10s, compared to PTA. No camo at all.PTA has
camo, and that is its primary defense, which is opposite to E50
used physical armor as defense. PTA is much quicker too. It has a
tier 10 gun, which increases its penetration abilities and alpha
damage. PTA also features secondary high penetration HE. Very
similar to E50 / PTA comparisons, E50M is a further step in the
direction. It loses DPM incredibly though, E50M has poor DPM indeed
for tier 10. Still a powerful rammer, still capably armored, and
the gun improves to a standard tier 10 gun with 330mm HEAT pen
available.Leopard has more DPM, APCR instead of HEAT, better alpha
damage, better mobility, better camo value, better gun depression.
This comes at the cost of health pool, and poor
armor.
Subject: The reason why people think this game is rigged
Link on message: #12845693
SlappedbyRommel, on Jun 04 2021 - 22:38, said:
So your guaranteed 80 percent is based on vapor ware if you believe I am incorrect how are you correct where is your data to back you up - unreal assumptions on your end also?
Link on message: #12845693

So your guaranteed 80 percent is based on vapor ware if you believe I am incorrect how are you correct where is your data to back you up - unreal assumptions on your end also?
DeviouslyCursed: You are trying (and failing) to switch the burden of proof.
You made a claim and presented no evidence, so I can dismiss it
with equal evidence (meaning no evidence). That's how it works. Or
at least in places and with people that matter. What people
like you try to do is make a ridiculous statement, then say "If you
can't prove it wrong, I'm right! Ha Ha!" and you think you've
accomplished something.
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12845654
Pepetruelo, on Jun 04 2021 - 17:35, said: Puede ser un emote animado?
Link on message: #12845654

Adam_Antium: Puede ser.
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12845654
Pepetruelo, on Jun 04 2021 - 17:35, said: Puede ser un emote animado?
Link on message: #12845654

Adam_Antina: Puede ser.
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12845654
Pepetruelo, on Jun 04 2021 - 17:35, said: Puede ser un emote animado?
Link on message: #12845654

Adam_Antium_: Puede ser.
Subject: Kampfpanzer 50 t?
Link on message: #12845642
Danadae, on Jun 03 2021 - 22:26, said: Would you pick the Kampfpanzer 50 t over the M60? I don't have a
whole lot of bonds, right around 15k.
Link on message: #12845642

churchill50: I would definitely call the Kampfpanzer 50t better than the
M60.Kpz 50t is a very well-rounded tier 9 med.The M60 is okay at
tier 10. But, it has the same playstyle as the Leopard I while
being almost strictly worse than the Leopard I.
Subject: The reason why people think this game is rigged
Link on message: #12845593
SlappedbyRommel, on Jun 04 2021 - 19:24, said:
Imagine if you could interpret on what i said I did but your were unable to understand it was a test not a fact but many are having the same thing occur. Did I say this was absolute I know everything no I did not I implied it was a test apparently you are to clueless to understand this.
Link on message: #12845593

Imagine if you could interpret on what i said I did but your were unable to understand it was a test not a fact but many are having the same thing occur. Did I say this was absolute I know everything no I did not I implied it was a test apparently you are to clueless to understand this.
DeviouslyCursed: I read it. I understood it. It was garbage. No data, just
approximations. I guarantee if the data was presented it wouldn't
be 80%, which is the only actual detail you provided. Now you're
appealing to "many" stating the same, but the problem is those
"many" are just as ignorant and clueless. Congratulations,
you have good company. Well, not good, but similar, and I'm sure
you all think that is good.
Subject: Incoming! Battlefield Heavy Hitters special offers.
Link on message: #12845520
Link on message: #12845520
stabbymckill: Good afternoon tankers,
Special offers on three favorite heavy hitters are coming to the premium shop. Starting today June 4 running through June 11 enjoy special pricing on the M54 Renegade, ISU-152K, and the Chrysler K.



Head over to the article here to get all the additional details.
Special offers on three favorite heavy hitters are coming to the premium shop. Starting today June 4 running through June 11 enjoy special pricing on the M54 Renegade, ISU-152K, and the Chrysler K.



Head over to the article here to get all the additional details.
Subject: Incoming! Steel Hunter 2021: Stage 4 (Starts 6/7)
Link on message: #12845515
Link on message: #12845515
stabbymckill: Good afternoon Tankers,
Stage 4 of Steel Hunter is almost upon us. It officially kicks off June 7 and promises further opportunities for heated battles, intense firepower and desperate last stands.
https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/game-events/steel-hunter-2021-stage-4/Get the full details on the upcoming Steel Hunter stage in the article here.
Stage 4 of Steel Hunter is almost upon us. It officially kicks off June 7 and promises further opportunities for heated battles, intense firepower and desperate last stands.

https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/game-events/steel-hunter-2021-stage-4/Get the full details on the upcoming Steel Hunter stage in the article here.
Subject: Tank rewards?
Link on message: #12845500
Link on message: #12845500
_BobaFett: It has been far too long since they put it on "hiatus".
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12845478
enuZi, on Jun 04 2021 - 13:29, said: Tengo un modelo con varios colores. ¿Elijo uno solo y me la juego o
puedo presentar un png donde se vean bien todas las variantes?.
Link on message: #12845478

Adam_Antium: Uno solo. Quizás después podemos hacer otra competición,
total, tenemos muuuuchos espacios libres.
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12845478
enuZi, on Jun 04 2021 - 13:29, said: Tengo un modelo con varios colores. ¿Elijo uno solo y me la juego o
puedo presentar un png donde se vean bien todas las variantes?.
Link on message: #12845478

Adam_Antina: Uno solo. Quizás después podemos hacer otra competición,
total, tenemos muuuuchos espacios libres.
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12845478
enuZi, on Jun 04 2021 - 13:29, said: Tengo un modelo con varios colores. ¿Elijo uno solo y me la juego o
puedo presentar un png donde se vean bien todas las variantes?.
Link on message: #12845478

Adam_Antium_: Uno solo. Quizás después podemos hacer otra competición,
total, tenemos muuuuchos espacios libres.
Subject: The reason why people think this game is rigged
Link on message: #12845461
ATruk, on Jun 04 2021 - 18:35, said: There is such a thing as a stop loss. It means stop throwing money
at the mistake. Example; sell used classic car that keeps breaking
down to get back some of the money from the purchase. This car
example is bad because "classic" implies intrinsic value beyond
driveability. Example 2: buy a video game to play for fun and find
out you don't like it. Can you return it? Do you keep playing even
if you don't like it? Do you keep playing it not having fun? I
would like to understand your thoughts on this.
Link on message: #12845461

DeviouslyCursed: If you want to understand his thoughts, stop using logic and
reason. It's the only way you are going to get there.
Subject: Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Link on message: #12845459
ImBonzo, on Jun 03 2021 - 22:50, said: As an evil user of XVM (yeah, I use it. And play arty. Shut-up), my
hope is to not see MM provide matches like the following to ANYONE:
> A tier 8 game in which one team had 5 above average,
unplatooned, players (green and above), and no tomatoes. The other
team had 1 green player and 2 tomatoes. I, and most of my crappy
colleagues, would prefer that the "wealth" be spread. In this
example, team A had a "yellow" Lansen player and team B had a
"blue" one. Why couldn't MM swap those two?? Plus one other similar
trade, making 3 above average vs. 3 above average. And, I am not
saying only address the above-average players, but want to make my
example more clear. One of 2 things are most likely to happen in
the above game: the above average players will dominate and the
less-than on their team will run around catching crumbs. In that
case, the other team's lowly players don't "just get better" by
being wiped out and the same team's crumb-catchers don't either.
-OR- The "good" players will sit in the back, let their "lowly"
players fight and die, then swoop in to clean up the mess to
improve their P/R. > a Tier 8-10 battle: Team A had a
"blue" and a "green" in Tier 10, a platoon of 2 tier 9 heavies (one
"purple" and one "blue" ), a "green" tier 9 TD player, and a "blue"
tier 8 MT player. The rest were "yellow" or worse, including one
tomato tier 8 TD player. Team B had one tier 10 "green" MT player.
The rest were "yellow" or worse, including a tomato tier 8 TD
player. The outcome is obvious. The frustration on Team B, equally
so. Why does this need to happen? It doesn't. If one team has a
stellar platoon, why not WHEN POSSIBLE offset that with random
players of similar abilities on the other team? The difference in
sum of the P/Rs or other performance measurements must have been
huge. I would advocate total team (pick a performance measurement)s
be within 10-15% whenever possible.
Random battles can still be random as to with whom you play, the equipment brought into the battle, etc., but with a mild LSBMM (Loosely Skill Based MM).
Link on message: #12845459

Random battles can still be random as to with whom you play, the equipment brought into the battle, etc., but with a mild LSBMM (Loosely Skill Based MM).
DeviouslyCursed: No. You want good players to give up the advantage they
create with their consistent contribution, and saddle them with
more worse players then other people get. No. If you
don't think Random MM is fair, get better, it will let your skill
shine. If you keep playing poorly, your win rate suffers, as it
should.
Subject: The reason why people think this game is rigged
Link on message: #12845437
SlappedbyRommel, on Jun 03 2021 - 14:43, said: I did a test for one hour no boosters and games were good in the
sense of mm then 1 hour with boosters on what a crap show - ended
up bottom tier rung 80 percent of the game. Credit earnings
garbage. Yes WG devs are nickel and diming every aspect of this
game too bad credits aren't getting any better for the player
base. The swing from earning decent credits to losing the pendulum
has swung to far to one side now.. wt_f WG get your crap together!
!!!!!!!
Link on message: #12845437

DeviouslyCursed: Imagine the confidence you would have if you were this
clueless. Simply knowing you were right about everything without
actually having to know anything would be awesome!
Subject: Do You Use Rentals?
Link on message: #12845430
Link on message: #12845430
DeviouslyCursed: I think most people that don't see the use of rentals already have
tier 8 premium tanks. The fact that WG gives out so many rentals it
a testament to their generosity to F2P players. Realistically you
never have to buy a tier 8 prem unless you want a specific
one. To people who spend money it migh be an annoyance (which
I don't get, just get rid of the tank and the crew if you don't
want it, or keep the tank as extra nation specific barracks
space). But for F2P with no tier 8 prems, these rentals are
awesome.
Subject: Diferencias en cuentas in-game !
Link on message: #12845383
Biig_Daddy_3, on Jun 04 2021 - 12:31, said: Si alguien sabe que diferencias existen entre las diferentes tipos
de cuentas (comunity manager, sheriff, cuenta normal ,WGLA o
especiales) en relación al acceso del juego osea que tipos de
tanques tienen de forma origen, si parten con crédito ya en mano y
si salen con ramas desbloqueadas, etc. Si alguien tiene idea
! La verdad me interesa saber !
Link on message: #12845383

Adam_Antium: Sumado a lo que dijo Doogs, el Community Manager no tiene
cosas especiales, es un empleado. La cuenta suele ser como
cualquier otra. Por otro lado y de acuerdo a lo que yo recuerdo,
las cuentas de WGLNA que usábamos en la Silver tenían absolutamente
todo y con todos los skills al 100%, pero solo se pueden usar en
salas de entrenamiento o batallas especiales.
Subject: Diferencias en cuentas in-game !
Link on message: #12845383
Biig_Daddy_3, on Jun 04 2021 - 12:31, said: Si alguien sabe que diferencias existen entre las diferentes tipos
de cuentas (comunity manager, sheriff, cuenta normal ,WGLA o
especiales) en relación al acceso del juego osea que tipos de
tanques tienen de forma origen, si parten con crédito ya en mano y
si salen con ramas desbloqueadas, etc. Si alguien tiene idea
! La verdad me interesa saber !
Link on message: #12845383

Adam_Antina: Sumado a lo que dijo Doogs, el Community Manager no tiene
cosas especiales, es un empleado. La cuenta suele ser como
cualquier otra. Por otro lado y de acuerdo a lo que yo recuerdo,
las cuentas de WGLNA que usábamos en la Silver tenían absolutamente
todo y con todos los skills al 100%, pero solo se pueden usar en
salas de entrenamiento o batallas especiales.
Subject: Diferencias en cuentas in-game !
Link on message: #12845383
Biig_Daddy_3, on Jun 04 2021 - 12:31, said: Si alguien sabe que diferencias existen entre las diferentes tipos
de cuentas (comunity manager, sheriff, cuenta normal ,WGLA o
especiales) en relación al acceso del juego osea que tipos de
tanques tienen de forma origen, si parten con crédito ya en mano y
si salen con ramas desbloqueadas, etc. Si alguien tiene idea
! La verdad me interesa saber !
Link on message: #12845383

Adam_Antium_: Sumado a lo que dijo Doogs, el Community Manager no tiene
cosas especiales, es un empleado. La cuenta suele ser como
cualquier otra. Por otro lado y de acuerdo a lo que yo recuerdo,
las cuentas de WGLNA que usábamos en la Silver tenían absolutamente
todo y con todos los skills al 100%, pero solo se pueden usar en
salas de entrenamiento o batallas especiales.
Subject: Do You Use Rentals?
Link on message: #12845364
Link on message: #12845364
_BobaFett: I have stopped entering codes for them as have I stopped playing
them.
Subject: Una presentación para toda la comunidad
Link on message: #12845332
Link on message: #12845332
Adam_Antium: Vale aclarar que yo no soy sheriff, mi posición es la de
Coordinador de la Comunidad y más allá de esta cuenta, no tengo
acceso a otras. O sea, si me ven en partida no me focuseen que no
soy piñata de oro

Subject: Una presentación para toda la comunidad
Link on message: #12845332
Link on message: #12845332
Adam_Antina: Vale aclarar que yo no soy sheriff, mi posición es la de
Coordinador de la Comunidad y más allá de esta cuenta, no tengo
acceso a otras. O sea, si me ven en partida no me focuseen que no
soy piñata de oro

Subject: Una presentación para toda la comunidad
Link on message: #12845332
Link on message: #12845332
Adam_Antium_: Vale aclarar que yo no soy sheriff, mi posición es la de
Coordinador de la Comunidad y más allá de esta cuenta, no tengo
acceso a otras. O sea, si me ven en partida no me focuseen que no
soy piñata de oro

Реклама | Adv