Question: Leopard vs. E 50 line

Draschel: I will start with T7, because no one cares about fodder lowbies  Panther has a powerful gun that can penetrate any enemy it faces, has fair DPM, .....but has low alpha damage with the gun, traversing the turret spoils gun handling, and bad camo value.VK3002 has much more maneuverability and mobility. Over 25% better camo available. Better DPM, but VK will have lots of trouble penetrating tough 8-9 even with APCR Panther II has better gun control, better DPM, better alpha damage, decent health pool, more view range. But is slow, Indien panzer itself isn't fast.....but panther II is even slower.Indien panzer has slightly better gun depression, slightly more useful armor, slightly more mobility, and has good high explosive penetration.  E50 definitely has solid armor in defensible locations, and is a tier 7 bully. This is something Leo PTA can't ever do, basically. It is also a more destructive rammer, and takes collisions much better than PTA does. E50 has more DPM, but can have more difficulty penetrating tier 10s, compared to PTA. No camo  at all.PTA has camo, and that is its primary defense, which is opposite to E50 used physical armor as defense. PTA is much quicker too. It has a tier 10 gun, which increases its penetration abilities and alpha damage. PTA also features secondary high penetration HE. Very similar to E50 / PTA comparisons, E50M is a further step in the direction. It loses DPM incredibly though, E50M has poor DPM indeed for tier 10. Still a powerful rammer, still capably armored, and the gun improves to a standard tier 10 gun with 330mm HEAT pen available.Leopard has more DPM, APCR instead of HEAT, better alpha damage, better mobility, better camo value, better gun depression. This comes at the cost of health pool, and poor armor.