Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Campaign 3 Fame Point Fair Play Enforcement
Link on message: #8169619
Link on message: #8169619
Hypnotik: In order to encourage honest play during Campaign 3, we will be
posting a log of battles which are reviewed during the event, along
with any punitive actions taken. How a battle gets flagged
for review: Automatic Detection System - Some battles will be
flagged for review automatically. If an initial investigation
warrants a full check, we will contact the clans involved to supply
a replay file of the battle in question. Player Report -
Player-submitted reports of unfair play submitted via the Support system will be
looked at (include any evidence you have to support your claim). If
there is enough evidence of unfair play, we will contact the clans
involved to supply a replay file of the battle in question. Abuse
of this system may result in punitive action. Random Review -
Battles may be randomly chosen for review. If an initial
investigation warrants a full check, we will contact the clans
involved to supply a replay file of the battle in question.
Who gets the replay request? Replay requests will be sent via
PM and via account registration email to all Commanders
and Executive Officers of the clan(s) in question. Clans will have
48 hours to provide a replay of the battle in question.
Battle Review Log: Specific clan names will only be published in
the event that they are found to be violating the rules of the
Campaign or have not provided a replay in response to our request.
Any clans that currently have battles under review will not be
named. Battle Date Battle Type Battle Province Clans
Involved Status Actions Taken 11/22/2014 Standard Miami, Florida
4ZKN, GANGZ Unfair Play Confirmed 2x FP Earned Penalty 11/28/2014
Landing San Diego, California -_A_- Unfair Play Confirmed 2x FP
Earned Penalty 0 clans / 0 battles Under Review - 42
clans / 22 battles Closed No Action Definitions: Battle Date
- When the battle(s) in question took place Battle Type - What
type of battle is in question Battle Province - What province(s)
is/are being fought over Clans Involved - Which clans were involved
in the battle or series of battles Status - The current status of
the review Under Review - A request has been sent to the clan(s) in
question for a replay file of the battle or a replay file of
the battle has been received from the clan(s) in question and is
being reviewed. Replay Not Provided - The clan(s) in question have
not provided a replay within 48 hours of the request. Unfair Play
Confirmed - We have confirmed unfair play by one or more clans
involved. Closed - There was insufficient evidence of unfair play.
No action will be taken. Types of Punishment: Depending on
the severity of the violation and how many offenses a clan has
committed, punishments may vary between a removal of fame points,
disqualification from the event, or even game bans. Update
Log: All times PST 11/24 11:20 - Initial requests sent - 15 clans,
8 battles 11/24 14:40 - 4 Clans (2 battles) cleared. 11/25 14:30 -
9 Clans (5 battles) cleared, one violation, 4 clans (2 battles)
added 11/26 17:30 - 4 Clans (2 battles) cleared. 12/4 12:30 - 6
clans (3 battles) added 12/8 11:00 - 6 clans (3 battles)
cleared, 10 clans (5 battles) added. 12/8 17:00 - 8 clans (4
battles) cleared 12/9 10:30 - one violation 12/15 - 12 clans (6
battles) added 12/17 14:00 - 12 clans/6 battles cleared 12/17 -
Campaign Finished
Subject: Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
Link on message: #8169590
condordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el
oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura
como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con
anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!
Link on message: #8169590
condordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el
oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura
como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con
anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!ElPozoleOlmeca: Hola Condor, ¿En donde viste que te dan oro por hacer
el tutorial?
Subject: Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
Link on message: #8169590
condordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el
oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura
como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con
anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!
Link on message: #8169590
condordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el
oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura
como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con
anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!PollotheDestroyer: Hola Condor, ¿En donde viste que te dan oro por hacer
el tutorial?
Subject: Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
Link on message: #8169590
condordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el
oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura
como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con
anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!
Link on message: #8169590
condordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el
oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura
como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con
anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!ApolloArtemis: Hola Condor, ¿En donde viste que te dan oro por hacer
el tutorial?
Subject: Skirmish 47 - Looking for a Team/Players
Link on message: #8169554
Link on message: #8169554
dance210: Tournament
Page
Registration for entire tournament
Registration for bravo playoff (weekend) only
Forum discussion .
.
If you are a player looking for a team, or a team looking for player(s), feel free to post here.
.
It is encouraged to say what tank(s) you have or are looking for, to make it easier to find players and teams. There are two separate registrations. State if you are interested in registering for the entire tournament (Group Stage + playoff) or only for the weekend (Bravo Playoff only).
.
If you are a player looking for a team, or a team looking for player(s), feel free to post here.
.
It is encouraged to say what tank(s) you have or are looking for, to make it easier to find players and teams. There are two separate registrations. State if you are interested in registering for the entire tournament (Group Stage + playoff) or only for the weekend (Bravo Playoff only).
Subject: El Infierno de Verdún: Segunda Etapa de la Tercera Campaña
Link on message: #8169539
Link on message: #8169539
Content_WG: ¡Las reglas de la Segunda Etapa de la Tercera Campaña han llegado!
¡Vea como su Clan puede dominar a la competición!
Texto completo de las noticias
Texto completo de las noticias
Subject: Inferno de Verdun: Segunda Fase da Terceira Campanha
Link on message: #8169538
Link on message: #8169538
Content_WG: As regras da Segunda Fase da Terceira Campanha estão aqui! Veja
como seu Clã pode dominar a competição!
Texto completo da notícia
Texto completo da notícia
Subject: Hell of Verdun: Third Campaign's Second Stage
Link on message: #8169537
Link on message: #8169537
Content_WG: The Third Campaign's Second Stage rules are here! See how your Clan
can dominate the competition!
Full news text Note: There will be a brief period where the Campaign Map is unavailable during the switch between Stage I and Stage II modes.
Full news text Note: There will be a brief period where the Campaign Map is unavailable during the switch between Stage I and Stage II modes.
Subject: The Chieftain's Hatch: Fury's Tiger Standoff
Link on message: #8169519
Walter_Sobchak, on Nov 20 2014 - 23:30, said: I guess we'll soon get to see if it's better or worse than
The Red Rose of Normandy from 2011. This trailer looks like
they just pasted together footage of various WW2 reenactment
events.
Link on message: #8169519
Walter_Sobchak, on Nov 20 2014 - 23:30, said: I guess we'll soon get to see if it's better or worse than
The Red Rose of Normandy from 2011. This trailer looks like
they just pasted together footage of various WW2 reenactment
events. The_Chieftain: That's... pretty damned bad.
Subject: 9.4 Issues and Reports
Link on message: #8169346
M00seface, on Nov 23 2014 - 14:31, said: Dont believe a word that Pigeon of War is saying folks, your
tickets will be ignored... I know many of you have suffered from
horrible support from Wargames. The minute any of you will
need assistance on your account where first level support cannot
provide help you are out of luck and they will ignore you. I have
not been able to play since version 9.3. That’s two months now
prople, is that service acceptable to you?
Link on message: #8169346
M00seface, on Nov 23 2014 - 14:31, said: Dont believe a word that Pigeon of War is saying folks, your
tickets will be ignored... I know many of you have suffered from
horrible support from Wargames. The minute any of you will
need assistance on your account where first level support cannot
provide help you are out of luck and they will ignore you. I have
not been able to play since version 9.3. That’s two months now
prople, is that service acceptable to you?Pigeon_of_War: Hey M00seface, I actually looked into your
issue a couple of times myself. They are working with the dev team
to fix it. You issue is a unique one, and unfortunately it's taking
some time, honestly it's taking more time than it should. Trust me,
if this was a simple matter, we would have taken care of it within
the same hour/day. No game studio wants unhappy players. Let me
apologize for the length of time it's taken your issue, we are
still working on it though.
Subject: Fútbol und Panzers.
Link on message: #8169141
Link on message: #8169141
ElPozoleOlmeca: ¡Hoy se hace el sorteo de la Copa América! http://www.espndepor...en-vina-del-mar
Subject: Fútbol und Panzers.
Link on message: #8169141
Link on message: #8169141
PollotheDestroyer: ¡Hoy se hace el sorteo de la Copa América! http://www.espndepor...en-vina-del-mar
Subject: Fútbol und Panzers.
Link on message: #8169141
Link on message: #8169141
ApolloArtemis: ¡Hoy se hace el sorteo de la Copa América!
http://www.espndeportes.com/news/story/_/id/2237626/la-copa-america-2015-enciende-motores-con-el-sorteo-en-vina-del-mar
Subject: Pronto habrán cambios en el Object 907
Link on message: #8168836
Link on message: #8168836
Content_WG: ¡Sigue leyendo para ver nuevos detallas sobre el Object 907!
Texto completo de las noticias
Texto completo de las noticias
Subject: Em Breve: Alterações ao Object 907
Link on message: #8168834
Link on message: #8168834
Content_WG: Continue lendo para novos detalhes sobre o veículo Object 907!
Texto completo da notícia
Texto completo da notícia
Subject: Played all the tier 8 heavies.....I don't like the KV4
Link on message: #8168708
kmanweiss, on Nov 24 2014 - 16:29, said: The problem is that it's slow
Link on message: #8168708
kmanweiss, on Nov 24 2014 - 16:29, said: The problem is that it's slowLert: And this is why unicorns don't like it, call it the worst
tank in tier, etc. It is inflexible. Yeah it's good at defending,
but the meta is mobility over defense, and if you're on a flank and
the battle is on another, outside your sphere of influence, you're
not going to be useful. I still like it though. But then,
I'm no unicorn.
Subject: Rare footage of an IOC training session
Link on message: #8168694
doctor_no, on Nov 24 2014 - 16:34, said: did Canadian sanction this??
Link on message: #8168694
doctor_no, on Nov 24 2014 - 16:34, said: did Canadian sanction this??Lert: He's the one driving.
Subject: can e25 not pen t32's upper plate with gold ammo? o.o
Link on message: #8168682
Link on message: #8168682
Lert: For a heavy with paper armor, T32 has pretty damn good armor.
Subject: Rare footage of an IOC training session
Link on message: #8168646
Link on message: #8168646
Lert: [Content Removed. Inappropriate Image.] That's why
we're so successful. Look at that co-ordination. That teamwork.
[Content removed. Inappropriate language.] ~GM/Mod
Teams
Subject: Played all the tier 8 heavies.....I don't like the KV4
Link on message: #8168630
Link on message: #8168630
Lert: Communist brick is best brick. Hide your lower plate, sidescrape
your hull, wiggle your turret and learn to love that long 107.
Subject: HEAT rounds
Link on message: #8168587
deathdancer, on Nov 24 2014 - 15:20, said: Ah thanks, so not losing pen, that is a good plus.
Link on message: #8168587
deathdancer, on Nov 24 2014 - 15:20, said: Ah thanks, so not losing pen, that is a good plus.Lert: An easily underestimated one. Your shiny 300mm pen APCR
shell could have ~220 left over at 500 meters, but your 350 pen
HEAT shell will still have 350. Ofcourse, destructible
walls, spaced armor and blades of grass detonate HEAT shells
prematurely, but if you can land a shot on a relatively flat piece
of armor, HEAT will go through at any range.
Subject: HEAT rounds
Link on message: #8168256
Link on message: #8168256
Lert: Despite its name, there is nothing explosive about HEAT shells, the
way they work in this game. They do not splash, they do not have
additional 'rays' to damage modules like HE and HESH have.
Their main advantage is that they don't lose pen over distance,
like AP and APCR do.
Read this.
Subject: WGLNA Season 5 Gold League Qualifier 2
Link on message: #8166651
The_Pining, on Nov 23 2014 - 16:37, said: No channel open? Isn't there supposed to be one one hour before
start, i.e., like 36 min ago?
Link on message: #8166651
The_Pining, on Nov 23 2014 - 16:37, said: No channel open? Isn't there supposed to be one one hour before
start, i.e., like 36 min ago?dance210: Matches don't start until tomorrow at 5 pm PST. Bracket
starts with 1/16, which is max. 32 teams. Apologies to any
who were confused :(
Subject: Need moar W! MOAR I say!
Link on message: #8166561
blueribbon, on Nov 23 2014 - 23:57, said: Man, do CW battles usually go that fast? I've never actually seen
one before.
killswitch95, on Nov 24 2014 - 00:02, said: Lert, typically your posts are easy to read, and clear... here
lately though... 
Link on message: #8166561
blueribbon, on Nov 23 2014 - 23:57, said: Man, do CW battles usually go that fast? I've never actually seen
one before.Lert: This was just a rush strat for our last strongholds battle
before the clanwars started.
killswitch95, on Nov 24 2014 - 00:02, said: Lert, typically your posts are easy to read, and clear... here
lately though... Lert: Nothing wrong with my typing. Your reading comprehension,
though ... You know, W = forward ... Moar W = moar forward = go
fast ...
Subject: Correcting the power balance between tiers
Link on message: #8166523
Link on message: #8166523
Lert: How about this: Currently the hitpoints increase per tier is
incredible, and it changes the meta of low tier play (seriously,
compare a tier 1's DPM to its hitpoints) completely around (tier
10's have disproportionately more HP than DPM) ... What if
the HP increase per tier was slashed?
So a Loltraktor would still
have 130 hp, but a KV-2 would have like 500 instead of 860, a Tiger
would have like 900 instead of 1500 and a Maus would have like 1700
instead of 3000. Relative hitpoints in-tier would still be
the same, but the hitpoint escalation would be a lot less, thus
making low tier tanks in any match proportionately more dangerous.
Higher tier tanks already have better guns, DPM and (often) armor,
why also the HP by such a proportion?
So a Loltraktor would still
have 130 hp, but a KV-2 would have like 500 instead of 860, a Tiger
would have like 900 instead of 1500 and a Maus would have like 1700
instead of 3000. Relative hitpoints in-tier would still be
the same, but the hitpoint escalation would be a lot less, thus
making low tier tanks in any match proportionately more dangerous.
Higher tier tanks already have better guns, DPM and (often) armor,
why also the HP by such a proportion?
Subject: Correcting the power balance between tiers
Link on message: #8166459
Link on message: #8166459
Lert: Part of me can see the validity in OP's post. The hitpoints
variances are just very, very big. If there were less of a variance
in HP per tier, it would be a more equal playing field, for better
or for worse.
Subject: Need moar W! MOAR I say!
Link on message: #8166395
Link on message: #8166395
Lert: Tier 6 stronks. Only a few minutes before the first CW battle pops
for the night, so our caller asks for tonks with as much W as we
can bring. Time for another IOC yolo strat. The answer? Use
W. And if that don't work? Use
more W.
Subject: What separates us?
Link on message: #8166338
LemmingRush, on Nov 23 2014 - 23:05, said: 1v1 55% to 60%~ are the same. It's where we put
ourselves when in retrospective to the entire battlefield that
gives us different results. typically.. Obviously I can't blanket
every player in this game.. But for the most part, a 55%er knows
how to drive his tank almost as well as I when we are in a 1v1, 1v2
ect..
Link on message: #8166338
LemmingRush, on Nov 23 2014 - 23:05, said: 1v1 55% to 60%~ are the same. It's where we put
ourselves when in retrospective to the entire battlefield that
gives us different results. typically.. Obviously I can't blanket
every player in this game.. But for the most part, a 55%er knows
how to drive his tank almost as well as I when we are in a 1v1, 1v2
ect..Lert: That's what Garbad argues as well. The difference between a
red and a green is tank driving skills and mechanics knowledge. The
difference between a green and a purple is battle flow, location,
meta.
Subject: What separates us?
Link on message: #8166267
xbreaburnx, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:22, said: read lert's guides
Link on message: #8166267
xbreaburnx, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:22, said: read lert's guidesLert: Not sure what good that would do you ... You're already a
far better player than the target audience of my guides, and myself
as well. They're meant to help reds ascend to greendom, not for
blues. I do appreciate the sentiment, though. Seems to me
that what separates a blue from a purple is mostly to do with meta,
rather than actual tank driving skillz. Wotlabs forum might be able
to help you out.
Subject: Wargames TRUE COLOURS
Link on message: #8166249
WOTplayer221, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:39, said: It's a Russian company.
Link on message: #8166249
WOTplayer221, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:39, said: It's a Russian company.Lert: No it isn't. @OP: It's wargaming. As for the
problem - it's 95% likely a local PC issue. Are your drivers up to
date? Is your windows relatively unclogged and your registry
relatively clean? Are any anti-virus programs biting WoT?
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8166182
_Centurion72_, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:13, said: Rip me, my brother, and my dad. Triple rip me
and my future college roomates.
YankeeJr, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:13, said: All my roommates play tenks in my house, u wot m8? Fite me irl
ktnxbai
Obj261, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:39, said: Here is the problem, what if more than one person lives at that
house or they use a proxy? They also never check to be honest...
Link on message: #8166182
_Centurion72_, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:13, said: Rip me, my brother, and my dad. Triple rip me
and my future college roomates. Lert:
YankeeJr, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:13, said: All my roommates play tenks in my house, u wot m8? Fite me irl
ktnxbaiLert:
Obj261, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:39, said: Here is the problem, what if more than one person lives at that
house or they use a proxy? They also never check to be honest...Lert: Why do you guys all ignore the "That's not entirely
reliable" bit I also put in there? I mean, come on .... If
75% of the people who earn the referral tank do so with a 'friend'
that has the same IP address / worldly location as them, that
should raise some alarm bells. It's more an overall indication than
reliable for a case-by-case basis.
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8166079
NightmareMk9, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:19, said: Or do you think I might have invited most of them a LONG
time ago???
Link on message: #8166079
NightmareMk9, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:19, said: Or do you think I might have invited most of them a LONG
time ago???Lert: And that's part of the problem. Two friends I invited
reached their first tier 10 ... two years ago. Why did they wait 4
years to add a referral / reward system?
Subject: Playing vs higher tier tanks
Link on message: #8166011
macfloam, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:58, said: If I'm forced to buy gold ammo, then the game isn't
free-to-play, is it? Successful free to play games are those where
spending money gives you a slight advantage (usually time saved,
i.e. bonus xp & gold, can buy higher tier tanks directly, etc.).
Pay-to-Win games (which are almost always unsuccessful) are ones in
which spending money is a requirement. The tank that has the most
issues (for me) with the tier gap is a Medium. So instead of being
a crappy Medium, you're suggesting instead that I play it as a
super crappy Light? Mediums don't make very good scout If I can hit
my opponent 10 times (with a single-shot cannon), before he hits me
once, I should win. If I don't, then there's something seriously
wrong with the game mechanics. Historical video games like this one
need to properly balance realism with playability. Personally, I
think the way they implemented the penetration mechanic ruins this
game, and is precisely why I much prefer WoWP. A higher tier
fighter will have more health and deal more dmg, but if I hit him
twice as often, he'll go down in flames first. s. As a side
note, many of you seemed to take offense to my "know-it-all"
comment. The only know-it-all reply was the one I just quoted: lots
of insults, with nothing constructive to add. Contrast that with
the majority of other replies, which were helpful based on
experience. Ironic then that the person with the "Community
Contributor" rank is the person who contributed the least to this
thread.
Link on message: #8166011
macfloam, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:58, said: If I'm forced to buy gold ammo, then the game isn't
free-to-play, is it? Successful free to play games are those where
spending money gives you a slight advantage (usually time saved,
i.e. bonus xp & gold, can buy higher tier tanks directly, etc.).
Pay-to-Win games (which are almost always unsuccessful) are ones in
which spending money is a requirement. The tank that has the most
issues (for me) with the tier gap is a Medium. So instead of being
a crappy Medium, you're suggesting instead that I play it as a
super crappy Light? Mediums don't make very good scout If I can hit
my opponent 10 times (with a single-shot cannon), before he hits me
once, I should win. If I don't, then there's something seriously
wrong with the game mechanics. Historical video games like this one
need to properly balance realism with playability. Personally, I
think the way they implemented the penetration mechanic ruins this
game, and is precisely why I much prefer WoWP. A higher tier
fighter will have more health and deal more dmg, but if I hit him
twice as often, he'll go down in flames first. s. As a side
note, many of you seemed to take offense to my "know-it-all"
comment. The only know-it-all reply was the one I just quoted: lots
of insults, with nothing constructive to add. Contrast that with
the majority of other replies, which were helpful based on
experience. Ironic then that the person with the "Community
Contributor" rank is the person who contributed the least to this
thread.Lert: 1) Yes it is, because 'gold' ammo can be bought for credits,
and credits are free to come by. 2) Which medium? There are many
mediums in the game. They all have their advantages and
disadvantages, and if you don't tell us which medium you mean, we
can't give direct tips, now can we. 3) There is so much wrong with
that that I can't even begin to go over it. So many wrongful
expectations. I gave you attitude, yes. Because your first
post is nothing but a whine, with sass and attitude. You didn't
come here for tips and help, you came here to vent and whine. We
don't need whiners here. As for me being a community
contributor and not having contributed to the thread - well duh -
I'm a community contributor, not a thread contributor. What
did I contribute to the community? Click the link in my sig, as I
have suggested to you earlier on. Just do it. I'll wait. See
that? Guides. Dozens and dozens of guides.
Written specifically for new players. Like you. READ THEM.
At least the first few, you know, the basic ones. They are
written from the view point of someone with 4+ years of experience
in this game, who has learned how to make tier 3's matter in a tier
5 game. Tell you what - if you are so convinced that you can
just broadly wipe away anything I say and continue on with your
attitude, then I'm going to give you a challenge. Name me a
tank. Any tank, that you have. I'll buy it. And we'll both run 50
games in it. 75% crew, no premium ammunition, no equipment, only
the small consumables. After that we'll compare performance. And
the loser gets to listen to the winner and stop giving sass and
attitude. Sound good?
Subject: Introducing: KMaus!
Link on message: #8166003
xthrahser, on Nov 23 2014 - 14:09, said: this is off topic, I am sorry... While playing a game, one
of the players on my side kept blocking me from killing one of the
enemy. Every time I moved, to get a shot, he again pulled in
front of me blocking my line of sight. He did this every time
I moved. I hit him several times as I tried to kill the enemy
as he pulled in front of me. So, Why was I banned for and
hour, especially as it was his fault he died??
Sorry if this wasn't the forum for this...I didn't know how to make a complaint.
Link on message: #8166003
xthrahser, on Nov 23 2014 - 14:09, said: this is off topic, I am sorry... While playing a game, one
of the players on my side kept blocking me from killing one of the
enemy. Every time I moved, to get a shot, he again pulled in
front of me blocking my line of sight. He did this every time
I moved. I hit him several times as I tried to kill the enemy
as he pulled in front of me. So, Why was I banned for and
hour, especially as it was his fault he died??Sorry if this wasn't the forum for this...I didn't know how to make a complaint.
dance210: If he was driving in front of you, he was most likely griefing you,
trying to get you to shoot him. You were banned because you
did enough damage to an ally. NEVER shoot an ally. If someone
griefs you like that, hold your fire until leaves. Also, feel free
to submit a Support ticket with the replay (https://na.wargaming.net/support/).
And remember, safety first on the internet. I would suggest
not making private information publicly available (e.g. phone
number, email, etc).
Subject: Stand-To: Week of November 24
Link on message: #8165934
Slothinson, on Nov 23 2014 - 13:53, said: So, if I want to, I can only sign up for one day, and not sign up
for the rest of the days right?
Link on message: #8165934
Slothinson, on Nov 23 2014 - 13:53, said: So, if I want to, I can only sign up for one day, and not sign up
for the rest of the days right?dance210: Yep! That's what this tournament is for...it's daily, so you
can sign up for as many or as few as you want each week :)
Also, please feel free to go
here to find the links for each tournament page, as
registration opens.
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8165929
BlackStealth08, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:50, said: How would one get caught doing this out of curiosity?
Link on message: #8165929
BlackStealth08, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:50, said: How would one get caught doing this out of curiosity?Lert: WG can see the IP addresses people are connecting from.
Ofcourse that's not entirely reliable, but still ...
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8165839
Link on message: #8165839
Lert: With the current referral reward tank on the line, I know many
people are creating alt accounts and grinding them to tier 10 just
to get the reward tank, after which they'll never play that alt
account again. Or use it to sockpuppet for clan wars. This
is not only against WG TOS (only one active account allowed) but
IMO also against the spirit of the referral system. It is intended
to help bring more players in, not for people to create new alt
accounts. On the other hand, one might argue that this alt
account grinding does serve to put population on the server for the
duration of the grinding. Should this be allowed to happen?
Or should something be done about this?
Subject: BEHOLD! Lert has join the US marines when he was a kitten O_O!
Link on message: #8165816
Link on message: #8165816
Lert: So then, open it again.
Subject: Playing vs higher tier tanks
Link on message: #8165808
Oliver__Clothesoff, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:15, said: He does have a point, most Tier 3 tanks have absolutely no chance
whatsoever against something like a KV-1 or Pz. IV.
Link on message: #8165808
Oliver__Clothesoff, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:15, said: He does have a point, most Tier 3 tanks have absolutely no chance
whatsoever against something like a KV-1 or Pz. IV.Lert: In a direct, face-to-face 1v1, no. That's why you don't
face-to-face 1v1 a tier Y+2 when you're in a tier Y. The only tier
3 I found woefully undergunned vs tier 5's is the Pz I C. And even
then, there are plenty of tier 5's you can damage, albeit at close
range. @OP: You've played 210 games. You know nothing. The
moment you admit that, you can open yourself to learning. Click the
link in my sig, it leads to my guides specifically for new players
like yourself who are trying to learn. That is, you do want
to learn, right? You didn't just make this thread to whine, did
you?
Реклама | Adv















