Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
Hypnotik
Campaign 3 Fame Point Fair Play Enforcement
arrow
24.11.2014 22:13:25
 
Subject: Campaign 3 Fame Point Fair Play Enforcement
Link on message: #8169619

Hypnotik: In order to encourage honest play during Campaign 3, we will be posting a log of battles which are reviewed during the event, along with any punitive actions taken.   How a battle gets flagged for review: Automatic Detection System - Some battles will be flagged for review automatically. If an initial investigation warrants a full check, we will contact the clans involved to supply a replay file of the battle in question. Player Report - Player-submitted reports of unfair play submitted via the Support system will be looked at (include any evidence you have to support your claim). If there is enough evidence of unfair play, we will contact the clans involved to supply a replay file of the battle in question. Abuse of this system may result in punitive action. Random Review - Battles may be randomly chosen for review.  If an initial investigation warrants a full check, we will contact the clans involved to supply a replay file of the battle in question.   Who gets the replay request? Replay requests will be sent via PM and via account registration email to all Commanders and Executive Officers of the clan(s) in question. Clans will have 48 hours to provide a replay of the battle in question.   Battle Review Log: Specific clan names will only be published in the event that they are found to be violating the rules of the Campaign or have not provided a replay in response to our request. Any clans that currently have battles under review will not be named.   Battle Date Battle Type Battle Province Clans Involved Status Actions Taken 11/22/2014 Standard Miami, Florida 4ZKN, GANGZ Unfair Play Confirmed 2x FP Earned Penalty 11/28/2014 Landing San Diego, California -_A_- Unfair Play Confirmed 2x FP Earned Penalty   0 clans / 0 battles Under Review -   42 clans / 22 battles Closed No Action   Definitions: Battle Date - When the battle(s) in question took place Battle Type - What type of battle is in question Battle Province - What province(s) is/are being fought over Clans Involved - Which clans were involved in the battle or series of battles Status - The current status of the review Under Review - A request has been sent to the clan(s) in question for a replay file of the battle or a replay file of the battle has been received from the clan(s) in question and is being reviewed. Replay Not Provided - The clan(s) in question have not provided a replay within 48 hours of the request. Unfair Play Confirmed - We have confirmed unfair play by one or more clans involved. Closed - There was insufficient evidence of unfair play. No action will be taken.   Types of Punishment: Depending on the severity of the violation and how many offenses a clan has committed, punishments may vary between a removal of fame points, disqualification from the event, or even game bans.   Update Log: All times PST 11/24 11:20 - Initial requests sent - 15 clans, 8 battles 11/24 14:40 - 4 Clans (2 battles) cleared. 11/25 14:30 - 9 Clans (5 battles) cleared, one violation, 4 clans (2 battles) added 11/26 17:30 - 4 Clans (2 battles) cleared. 12/4 12:30 - 6 clans (3 battles) added 12/8 11:00 - 6 clans (3 battles) cleared, 10 clans (5 battles) added. 12/8 17:00 - 8 clans (4 battles) cleared 12/9 10:30 - one violation 12/15 - 12 clans (6 battles) added 12/17 14:00 - 12 clans/6 battles cleared 12/17 - Campaign Finished


ElPozoleOlmeca
Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
arrow
24.11.2014 22:06:13
 
Subject: Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
Link on message: #8169590

View Postcondordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!

ElPozoleOlmeca:   Hola Condor,   ¿En donde viste que te dan oro por hacer el tutorial? 


PollotheDestroyer
Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
arrow
24.11.2014 22:06:13
 
Subject: Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
Link on message: #8169590

View Postcondordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!

PollotheDestroyer:   Hola Condor,   ¿En donde viste que te dan oro por hacer el tutorial? 


ApolloArtemis
Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
arrow
24.11.2014 22:06:13
 
Subject: Completé el entrenamiento inicial y no recibí el oro!
Link on message: #8169590

View Postcondordelosandes, on Nov 21 2014 - 16:20, said: Luego de completar el entrenamiento inicial no me fue acreditado el oro que corresponde como "recompensa", a pesar de lo cual figura como que ya recibí la recompensa mencionada. Ha pasado esto con anterioridad? alguien sabe como resolverlo? Muchas gracias!

ApolloArtemis:   Hola Condor,   ¿En donde viste que te dan oro por hacer el tutorial? 


dance210
Skirmish 47 - Looking for a Team/Players
arrow
24.11.2014 21:55:39
 
Subject: Skirmish 47 - Looking for a Team/Players
Link on message: #8169554

dance210: Tournament Page Registration for entire tournament Registration for bravo playoff (weekend) only Forum discussion .
.
If you are  a player looking for a team, or a team looking for player(s), feel free to post here.
.
It is encouraged to say what tank(s) you have or are looking for, to make it easier to find players and teams.   There are two separate registrations. State if you are interested in registering for the entire tournament (Group Stage + playoff) or only for the weekend (Bravo Playoff only).


Content_WG
El Infierno de Verdún: Segunda Etapa de la Tercera Campaña
arrow
24.11.2014 21:52:04
 
Subject: El Infierno de Verdún: Segunda Etapa de la Tercera Campaña
Link on message: #8169539

Content_WG: ¡Las reglas de la Segunda Etapa de la Tercera Campaña han llegado! ¡Vea como su Clan puede dominar a la competición!
Texto completo de las noticias


Content_WG
Inferno de Verdun: Segunda Fase da Terceira Campanha
arrow
24.11.2014 21:51:56
 
Subject: Inferno de Verdun: Segunda Fase da Terceira Campanha
Link on message: #8169538

Content_WG: As regras da Segunda Fase da Terceira Campanha estão aqui! Veja como seu Clã pode dominar a competição!
Texto completo da notícia


Content_WG
Hell of Verdun: Third Campaign's Second Stage
arrow
24.11.2014 21:51:45
 
Subject: Hell of Verdun: Third Campaign's Second Stage
Link on message: #8169537

Content_WG: The Third Campaign's Second Stage rules are here! See how your Clan can dominate the competition!

Full news text   Note: There will be a brief period where the Campaign Map is unavailable during the switch between Stage I and Stage II modes.


The_Chieftain
The Chieftain's Hatch: Fury's Tiger Standoff
arrow
24.11.2014 21:47:22
 
Subject: The Chieftain's Hatch: Fury's Tiger Standoff
Link on message: #8169519

View PostWalter_Sobchak, on Nov 20 2014 - 23:30, said:   I guess we'll soon get to see if it's better or worse than The Red Rose of Normandy from 2011.  This trailer looks like they just pasted together footage of various WW2 reenactment events.  

The_Chieftain:   That's... pretty damned bad.


Pigeon_of_War
9.4 Issues and Reports
arrow
24.11.2014 21:07:32
 
Subject: 9.4 Issues and Reports
Link on message: #8169346

View PostM00seface, on Nov 23 2014 - 14:31, said: Dont believe a word  that Pigeon of War is saying folks, your tickets will be ignored... I know many of you have suffered from horrible support from Wargames.  The minute any of you will need assistance on your account where first level support cannot provide help you are out of luck and they will ignore you. I have not been able to play since version 9.3. That’s two months now prople, is that service acceptable to you?

Pigeon_of_War:   Hey M00seface,    I actually looked into your issue a couple of times myself. They are working with the dev team to fix it. You issue is a unique one, and unfortunately it's taking some time, honestly it's taking more time than it should. Trust me, if this was a simple matter, we would have taken care of it within the same hour/day. No game studio wants unhappy players. Let me apologize for the length of time it's taken your issue, we are still working on it though.     


ElPozoleOlmeca
Fútbol und Panzers.
arrow
24.11.2014 20:24:06
 
Subject: Fútbol und Panzers.
Link on message: #8169141

ElPozoleOlmeca: ¡Hoy se hace el sorteo de la Copa América!   http://www.espndepor...en-vina-del-mar


PollotheDestroyer
Fútbol und Panzers.
arrow
24.11.2014 20:24:06
 
Subject: Fútbol und Panzers.
Link on message: #8169141

PollotheDestroyer: ¡Hoy se hace el sorteo de la Copa América!   http://www.espndepor...en-vina-del-mar


ApolloArtemis
Fútbol und Panzers.
arrow
24.11.2014 20:24:06
 
Subject: Fútbol und Panzers.
Link on message: #8169141

ApolloArtemis: ¡Hoy se hace el sorteo de la Copa América!   http://www.espndeportes.com/news/story/_/id/2237626/la-copa-america-2015-enciende-motores-con-el-sorteo-en-vina-del-mar


Content_WG
Pronto habrán cambios en el Object 907
arrow
24.11.2014 19:12:13
 
Subject: Pronto habrán cambios en el Object 907
Link on message: #8168836

Content_WG: ¡Sigue leyendo para ver nuevos detallas sobre el Object 907!

Texto completo de las noticias


Content_WG
Em Breve: Alterações ao Object 907
arrow
24.11.2014 19:12:07
 
Subject: Em Breve: Alterações ao Object 907
Link on message: #8168834

Content_WG: Continue lendo para novos detalhes sobre o veículo Object 907!

Texto completo da notícia


Content_WG
Changes to Object 907 Coming Soon
arrow
24.11.2014 19:11:55
 
Subject: Changes to Object 907 Coming Soon
Link on message: #8168833

Content_WG: Read on for some new details for the Object 907 vehicle!

Full news text


Lert
Played all the tier 8 heavies.....I don't like the KV4
arrow
24.11.2014 18:40:01
 
Subject: Played all the tier 8 heavies.....I don't like the KV4
Link on message: #8168708

View Postkmanweiss, on Nov 24 2014 - 16:29, said:   The problem is that it's slow

Lert:   And this is why unicorns don't like it, call it the worst tank in tier, etc. It is inflexible. Yeah it's good at defending, but the meta is mobility over defense, and if you're on a flank and the battle is on another, outside your sphere of influence, you're not going to be useful.   I still like it though. But then, I'm no unicorn.


Lert
Rare footage of an IOC training session
arrow
24.11.2014 18:37:30
 
Subject: Rare footage of an IOC training session
Link on message: #8168694

View Postdoctor_no, on Nov 24 2014 - 16:34, said: did Canadian sanction this??

Lert:   He's the one driving.


Lert
can e25 not pen t32's upper plate with gold ammo? o.o
arrow
24.11.2014 18:33:49
 
Subject: can e25 not pen t32's upper plate with gold ammo? o.o
Link on message: #8168682

Lert: For a heavy with paper armor, T32 has pretty damn good armor.


Lert
Rare footage of an IOC training session
arrow
24.11.2014 18:24:43
 
Subject: Rare footage of an IOC training session
Link on message: #8168646

Lert: [Content Removed. Inappropriate Image.]   That's why we're so successful. Look at that co-ordination. That teamwork. [Content removed. Inappropriate language.]   ~GM/Mod Teams


Lert
Played all the tier 8 heavies.....I don't like the KV4
arrow
24.11.2014 18:22:03
 
Subject: Played all the tier 8 heavies.....I don't like the KV4
Link on message: #8168630

Lert: Communist brick is best brick. Hide your lower plate, sidescrape your hull, wiggle your turret and learn to love that long 107.


Lert
HEAT rounds
arrow
24.11.2014 18:15:16
 
Subject: HEAT rounds
Link on message: #8168587

View Postdeathdancer, on Nov 24 2014 - 15:20, said: Ah thanks, so not losing pen, that is a good plus.

Lert:   An easily underestimated one. Your shiny 300mm pen APCR shell could have ~220 left over at 500 meters, but your 350 pen HEAT shell will still have 350.   Ofcourse, destructible walls, spaced armor and blades of grass detonate HEAT shells prematurely, but if you can land a shot on a relatively flat piece of armor, HEAT will go through at any range.


Lert
HEAT rounds
arrow
24.11.2014 16:41:24
 
Subject: HEAT rounds
Link on message: #8168256

Lert: Despite its name, there is nothing explosive about HEAT shells, the way they work in this game. They do not splash, they do not have additional 'rays' to damage modules like HE and HESH have.   Their main advantage is that they don't lose pen over distance, like AP and APCR do.   Read this.


dance210
WGLNA Season 5 Gold League Qualifier 2
arrow
24.11.2014 02:42:22
 
Subject: WGLNA Season 5 Gold League Qualifier 2
Link on message: #8166651

View PostThe_Pining, on Nov 23 2014 - 16:37, said: No channel open? Isn't there supposed to be one one hour before start, i.e., like 36 min ago?

dance210:   Matches don't start until tomorrow at 5 pm PST. Bracket starts with 1/16, which is max. 32 teams.   Apologies to any who were confused :(


Lert
Need moar W! MOAR I say!
arrow
24.11.2014 02:13:24
 
Subject: Need moar W! MOAR I say!
Link on message: #8166561

View Postblueribbon, on Nov 23 2014 - 23:57, said: Man, do CW battles usually go that fast? I've never actually seen one before.

Lert:   This was just a rush strat for our last strongholds battle before the clanwars started.  

View Postkillswitch95, on Nov 24 2014 - 00:02, said: Lert, typically your posts are easy to read, and clear... here lately though... :amazed:

Lert:   Nothing wrong with my typing. Your reading comprehension, though ... You know, W = forward ... Moar W = moar forward = go fast ...


Lert
Correcting the power balance between tiers
arrow
24.11.2014 02:01:06
 
Subject: Correcting the power balance between tiers
Link on message: #8166523

Lert: How about this:   Currently the hitpoints increase per tier is incredible, and it changes the meta of low tier play (seriously, compare a tier 1's DPM to its hitpoints) completely around (tier 10's have disproportionately more HP than DPM) ...   What if the HP increase per tier was slashed?     So a Loltraktor would still have 130 hp, but a KV-2 would have like 500 instead of 860, a Tiger would have like 900 instead of 1500 and a Maus would have like 1700 instead of 3000.   Relative hitpoints in-tier would still be the same, but the hitpoint escalation would be a lot less, thus making low tier tanks in any match proportionately more dangerous. Higher tier tanks already have better guns, DPM and (often) armor, why also the HP by such a proportion?


Lert
Correcting the power balance between tiers
arrow
24.11.2014 01:43:26
 
Subject: Correcting the power balance between tiers
Link on message: #8166459

Lert: Part of me can see the validity in OP's post. The hitpoints variances are just very, very big. If there were less of a variance in HP per tier, it would be a more equal playing field, for better or for worse.


Lert
Need moar W! MOAR I say!
arrow
24.11.2014 01:29:01
 
Subject: Need moar W! MOAR I say!
Link on message: #8166395

Lert: Tier 6 stronks. Only a few minutes before the first CW battle pops for the night, so our caller asks for tonks with as much W as we can bring. Time for another IOC yolo strat.   The answer? Use W. And if that don't work? Use more W.


Lert
What separates us?
arrow
24.11.2014 01:17:48
 
Subject: What separates us?
Link on message: #8166338

View PostLemmingRush, on Nov 23 2014 - 23:05, said:   1v1 55% to 60%~  are the same. It's where we put ourselves when in retrospective to the entire battlefield that gives us different results. typically.. Obviously I can't blanket every player in this game.. But for the most part, a 55%er knows how to drive his tank almost as well as I when we are in a 1v1, 1v2 ect..

Lert:   That's what Garbad argues as well. The difference between a red and a green is tank driving skills and mechanics knowledge. The difference between a green and a purple is battle flow, location, meta.


Lert
What separates us?
arrow
24.11.2014 01:04:01
 
Subject: What separates us?
Link on message: #8166267

View Postxbreaburnx, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:22, said: read lert's guides

Lert:   Not sure what good that would do you ... You're already a far better player than the target audience of my guides, and myself as well. They're meant to help reds ascend to greendom, not for blues. I do appreciate the sentiment, though.   Seems to me that what separates a blue from a purple is mostly to do with meta, rather than actual tank driving skillz. Wotlabs forum might be able to help you out.


Lert
Wargames TRUE COLOURS
arrow
24.11.2014 01:01:46
 
Subject: Wargames TRUE COLOURS
Link on message: #8166249

View PostWOTplayer221, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:39, said: It's a Russian company.

Lert:   No it isn't.   @OP: It's wargaming.   As for the problem - it's 95% likely a local PC issue. Are your drivers up to date? Is your windows relatively unclogged and your registry relatively clean? Are any anti-virus programs biting WoT?


Lert
Referral reward tank question
arrow
24.11.2014 00:51:47
 
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8166182

View Post_Centurion72_, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:13, said:   Rip me, my brother, and my dad.     Triple rip me and my future college roomates. 

Lert:  

View PostYankeeJr, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:13, said: All my roommates play tenks in my house, u wot m8? Fite me irl ktnxbai

Lert:  

View PostObj261, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:39, said: Here is the problem, what if more than one person lives at that house or they use a proxy? They also never check to be honest...

Lert:   Why do you guys all ignore the "That's not entirely reliable" bit I also put in there? I mean, come on ....   If 75% of the people who earn the referral tank do so with a 'friend' that has the same IP address / worldly location as them, that should raise some alarm bells. It's more an overall indication than reliable for a case-by-case basis.


Lert
Referral reward tank question
arrow
24.11.2014 00:30:56
 
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8166079

View PostNightmareMk9, on Nov 23 2014 - 22:19, said:   Or do you think I might have invited most of them a LONG time ago???

Lert:   And that's part of the problem.   Two friends I invited reached their first tier 10 ... two years ago. Why did they wait 4 years to add a referral / reward system?


Lert
Playing vs higher tier tanks
arrow
24.11.2014 00:16:23
 
Subject: Playing vs higher tier tanks
Link on message: #8166011

View Postmacfloam, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:58, said:   If I'm forced to buy gold ammo, then the game isn't free-to-play, is it? Successful free to play games are those where spending money gives you a slight advantage (usually time saved, i.e. bonus xp & gold, can buy higher tier tanks directly, etc.). Pay-to-Win games (which are almost always unsuccessful) are ones in which spending money is a requirement. The tank that has the most issues (for me) with the tier gap is a Medium. So instead of being a crappy Medium, you're suggesting instead that I play it as a super crappy Light? Mediums don't make very good scout If I can hit my opponent 10 times (with a single-shot cannon), before he hits me once, I should win. If I don't, then there's something seriously wrong with the game mechanics. Historical video games like this one need to properly balance realism with playability. Personally, I think the way they implemented the penetration mechanic ruins this game, and is precisely why I much prefer WoWP. A higher tier fighter will have more health and deal more dmg, but if I hit him twice as often, he'll go down in flames first. s.   As a side note, many of you seemed to take offense to my "know-it-all" comment. The only know-it-all reply was the one I just quoted: lots of insults, with nothing constructive to add. Contrast that with the majority of other replies, which were helpful based on experience. Ironic then that the person with the "Community Contributor" rank is the person who contributed the least to this thread.

Lert:   1) Yes it is, because 'gold' ammo can be bought for credits, and credits are free to come by. 2) Which medium? There are many mediums in the game. They all have their advantages and disadvantages, and if you don't tell us which medium you mean, we can't give direct tips, now can we. 3) There is so much wrong with that that I can't even begin to go over it. So many wrongful expectations.   I gave you attitude, yes. Because your first post is nothing but a whine, with sass and attitude. You didn't come here for tips and help, you came here to vent and whine. We don't need whiners here.   As for me being a community contributor and not having contributed to the thread - well duh - I'm a community contributor, not a thread contributor.   What did I contribute to the community? Click the link in my sig, as I have suggested to you earlier on. Just do it. I'll wait.   See that?   Guides.   Dozens and dozens of guides.   Written specifically for new players. Like you.   READ THEM. At least the first few, you know, the basic ones.   They are written from the view point of someone with 4+ years of experience in this game, who has learned how to make tier 3's matter in a tier 5 game.   Tell you what - if you are so convinced that you can just broadly wipe away anything I say and continue on with your attitude, then I'm going to give you a challenge.   Name me a tank. Any tank, that you have. I'll buy it. And we'll both run 50 games in it. 75% crew, no premium ammunition, no equipment, only the small consumables. After that we'll compare performance. And the loser gets to listen to the winner and stop giving sass and attitude. Sound good?


dance210
Introducing: KMaus!
arrow
24.11.2014 00:14:21
 
Subject: Introducing: KMaus!
Link on message: #8166003

View Postxthrahser, on Nov 23 2014 - 14:09, said: this is off topic, I am sorry...   While playing a game, one of the players on my side kept blocking me from killing one of the enemy.  Every time I moved, to get a shot, he again pulled in front of me blocking my line of sight.  He did this every time I moved.  I hit him several times as I tried to kill the enemy as he pulled in front of me.  So, Why was I banned for and hour, especially as it was his fault he died??
Sorry if this wasn't the forum for this...I didn't know how to make a complaint.

dance210: If he was driving in front of you, he was most likely griefing you, trying to get you to shoot him.   You were banned because you did enough damage to an ally. NEVER shoot an ally. If someone griefs you like that, hold your fire until leaves. Also, feel free to submit a Support ticket with the replay (https://na.wargaming.net/support/).   And remember, safety first on the internet. I would suggest not making private information publicly available (e.g. phone number, email, etc).


dance210
Stand-To: Week of November 24
arrow
23.11.2014 23:56:38
 
Subject: Stand-To: Week of November 24
Link on message: #8165934

View PostSlothinson, on Nov 23 2014 - 13:53, said: So, if I want to, I can only sign up for one day, and not sign up for the rest of the days right?

dance210:   Yep! That's what this tournament is for...it's daily, so you can sign up for as many or as few as you want each week :)   Also, please feel free to go here to find the links for each tournament page, as registration opens.


Lert
Referral reward tank question
arrow
23.11.2014 23:55:17
 
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8165929

View PostBlackStealth08, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:50, said:   How would one get caught doing this out of curiosity?

Lert:   WG can see the IP addresses people are connecting from. Ofcourse that's not entirely reliable, but still ...


Lert
Referral reward tank question
arrow
23.11.2014 23:31:36
 
Subject: Referral reward tank question
Link on message: #8165839

Lert: With the current referral reward tank on the line, I know many people are creating alt accounts and grinding them to tier 10 just to get the reward tank, after which they'll never play that alt account again. Or use it to sockpuppet for clan wars.   This is not only against WG TOS (only one active account allowed) but IMO also against the spirit of the referral system. It is intended to help bring more players in, not for people to create new alt accounts.   On the other hand, one might argue that this alt account grinding does serve to put population on the server for the duration of the grinding.   Should this be allowed to happen? Or should something be done about this?


Lert
BEHOLD! Lert has join the US marines when he was a kitten O_O!
arrow
23.11.2014 23:22:18
 
Subject: BEHOLD! Lert has join the US marines when he was a kitten O_O!
Link on message: #8165816

Lert: So then, open it again.


Lert
Playing vs higher tier tanks
arrow
23.11.2014 23:19:26
 
Subject: Playing vs higher tier tanks
Link on message: #8165808

View PostOliver__Clothesoff, on Nov 23 2014 - 21:15, said: He does have a point, most Tier 3 tanks have absolutely no chance whatsoever against something like a KV-1 or Pz. IV.

Lert:   In a direct, face-to-face 1v1, no. That's why you don't face-to-face 1v1 a tier Y+2 when you're in a tier Y. The only tier 3 I found woefully undergunned vs tier 5's is the Pz I C. And even then, there are plenty of tier 5's you can damage, albeit at close range.   @OP: You've played 210 games. You know nothing. The moment you admit that, you can open yourself to learning. Click the link in my sig, it leads to my guides specifically for new players like yourself who are trying to learn.   That is, you do want to learn, right? You didn't just make this thread to whine, did you?


Реклама | Adv