Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
eekeeboo
Clan wars gold allocation mistake
arrow
17.07.2019 21:31:00
 
Subject: Clan wars gold allocation mistake
Link on message: #17074846

eekeeboo: Hello tankers! There was an incident with gold allocation to clans from the campaign. Please do not spend the additional gold that was attributed accidentally. We will update tomorrow! Thanks for your understanding! Eek 


Jahpero
Arrêt du mode Batailles en équipe
arrow
17.07.2019 20:43:34
 
Subject: Arrêt du mode Batailles en équipe
Link on message: #17074708

Jahpero: Bonjour,      Donner son avis sur les forums est une chose. Nous essayons au maximum de laisser le contenu même si une phrase n'est pas correcte. (Nous enlevons dans ce cas là seulement la phrase) Poster en insultant la modération ne sert à rien. Nous modérons les forums/plateformes et rien d'autre. Nous taper dessus ne sert donc a rien nous ne sommes pas la pour répondre.    Comme exemple pour que cela soit clair, si tu es payé à faire des piscines, tu ne vas pas faire la terrasse qui est autour. (Tu n'es pas payé à ça)   Ceci dit ce n'est pas le sujet de ce topic donc je vous invite à continuer de partager votre avis, en restant constructif s'il vous plaît.   Merci de votre compréhension.  Jahpero  


eekeeboo
2 days of Team Battles - Winrate higher than 55% and this is the absurd result
arrow
17.07.2019 19:45:31
 
Subject: 2 days of Team Battles - Winrate higher than 55% and this is the absurd result
Link on message: #17074543

View PostValkyrionX, on 16 July 2019 - 11:29 PM, said:   it doesn't matter to anyone if the Tb are not played in mass, if they are played, and are played every day, it makes no sense to remove them   Improving them was too difficult, wasn't it?   yet another missed opportunity      

eekeeboo:   it does matter I'm sorry to say. Everything in the game costs money to maintain and if it's not used by a vast majority of your players it becomes cost inefficient and the resources are better used elsewhere.    Improvements have been used and changes made. The game mode overall was not appealing enough or the rewards not high enough then that's not a good thing to need this for people to play the mode vs randoms. 


eekeeboo
Are you guys having fun?
arrow
17.07.2019 19:11:01
 
Subject: Are you guys having fun?
Link on message: #17074449

View PostTungstenHitman, on 17 July 2019 - 11:12 AM, said:   I don't understand.     Same logic applies to players with low win rates. Why do players get annoyed with low win rate teammates when they make a bad play or don't know what to do or fail to carry an easily winnable battle when they seem to have everything in place to win that battle? If those low win rate players did the right thing at right moments or carried those easy wins then logically they don't have bad win rates they have good win rates. The reason they have bad win rates is that most the time they can't, and that's a simple fact too. 

eekeeboo:   Hello sorry, it is generally acknowledged that school holidays and events like warm weather can alter the demographics of the people who play and this may be something you are noticing. The latter part of your sentence was implied to the person who states how a person can have good stats but terrible winrate, generally good stats means you have the knowledge on how to perform, whereas low winrate players generally do not behave in that way.   

View PostOldtanker68, on 17 July 2019 - 01:09 PM, said:   I have never ever tried to hide it, i even refered to it in my original post. I responded to Your 2 posts and went to work, but returned and found my post was deleted.   This moderater is quite high on himself, but im guessing he wont be that much longer after he starts costing Wargaming Money.

eekeeboo:   Follow forum rules and you will have nothing to worry about.   

View Postgav00, on 17 July 2019 - 02:54 PM, said:   I am perfectly aware of what I imply. Given the amount of bad information, distruths and outright lies that the community teams have spewed onto their playerbase ("X will be buffed", "This tank line is going to be great", "X is perfectly balanced" etc.) you clearly have no connection to those in charge of creating such features.   So, are you ignorant, or are you simply paid to tell us what HQ want us to hear? Either way, dishonest and untrustworthy.

eekeeboo:   Changes that don't come are given a reason why and things balanced in a way are given a reason why. In the whole time of the game, ever. At no point was there a dicussion, point or proof from anyone on rigging, ever. Not once. On the contrary multiple statements and points of evidence from players proving otherwise. You can acknowledge the truth or not, but insulting me as lying to you is not something that will be tolerated on the forums.  16:14 Added after 3 minutes

View PostShivvering, on 17 July 2019 - 09:59 AM, said: Calm down with the replies eekeeboo, people will start to expect actually getting a response to their ill-conceived arguments in the future! ;)   I still have fun in this game - If I didn't, I'd stop playing. Taken plenty of breaks over the years, still find myself back here though as WoT offers something that I clearly enjoy.   I find I have the most fun playing fast, lightly armoured tanks (like the Leo 1). Gold spam? No issue - standard would have penned me anyway. Ridiculously armoured bobject ahead? No issue - relocate/flank/circle. RNG tomfoolery? - No issue - I had my entire crew knocked out yesterday from some EBR HE spam in FL. This is the first time I can recall losing a tank by this means. I also fired a shot from my Progetto, while travelling at full speed, and killed a full speed EBR traveling across my sights at 400m - moral of the story here, RNG helps you  as much as it screws you.    

eekeeboo:   It's always worth a try to help people! 16:14 Added after 3 minutes

View PostShivvering, on 17 July 2019 - 09:59 AM, said: Calm down with the replies eekeeboo, people will start to expect actually getting a response to their ill-conceived arguments in the future! ;)   I still have fun in this game - If I didn't, I'd stop playing. Taken plenty of breaks over the years, still find myself back here though as WoT offers something that I clearly enjoy.   I find I have the most fun playing fast, lightly armoured tanks (like the Leo 1). Gold spam? No issue - standard would have penned me anyway. Ridiculously armoured bobject ahead? No issue - relocate/flank/circle. RNG tomfoolery? - No issue - I had my entire crew knocked out yesterday from some EBR HE spam in FL. This is the first time I can recall losing a tank by this means. I also fired a shot from my Progetto, while travelling at full speed, and killed a full speed EBR traveling across my sights at 400m - moral of the story here, RNG helps you  as much as it screws you.    

eekeeboo:   It's always worth a try to help people! 


vuque
Güzelim KV-1S'yi hatırlıyor musunuz?
arrow
17.07.2019 18:58:04
 
Subject: Güzelim KV-1S'yi hatırlıyor musunuz?
Link on message: #17074419

View Postl3oomerangg, on 17 July 2019 - 05:09 PM, said: KV-1S i hatırlamaz mıyız ya... Ne güzel içinden geçmiştiniz öyle...

vuque:  


vuque
Deneyime yönetilebilir bonus üzerine
arrow
17.07.2019 18:48:48
 
Subject: Deneyime yönetilebilir bonus üzerine
Link on message: #17074401

vuque: Bu bonus savaştan sonra sizin tarafınızdan manuel olarak uygulanıyor ve siz bu bonusu birkaç maç sonra da uygulanabiliyorsunuz. Bu durumda, örnek vermek gerekirse; savaşı oynayabilir, mürettebatı çıkarabilir veya taşıyabilir ve ardından bonusu uygulayabilirsiniz.
Bu sebeple; mümkün olan tüm senaryolarda mürettebat deneyimi birikiminin uygun şekilde işlenmesi mümkün olmadığından böyle bir uygulamaya gidildiğini söyleyebilirim.


vuque
Ateş Yolu Özetiniz Burada
arrow
17.07.2019 18:26:41
 
Subject: Ateş Yolu Özetiniz Burada
Link on message: #17074345

View PostDerpMcKebab, on 17 July 2019 - 05:25 PM, said:   Özerk abi tahvillerin ne zaman dağıtılacağı ile ilgili bir bilgin var mı?

vuque:   Yakında diyebilirim! ;)


vuque
Ateş Yolu Özetiniz Burada
arrow
17.07.2019 18:20:31
 
Subject: Ateş Yolu Özetiniz Burada
Link on message: #17074333

View PostPugatchov, on 17 July 2019 - 04:36 PM, said: Seferlerin sonundaki sıralamam 8105. Bir gün sonrası +75 yükselerek 8030. sıraya ilerledim. 109 kişi banlandıysa ve sıralama içerisindeyse benim de 109 sıra ilerleyip 8000 içine girmem gerekmiyor mu ? 

vuque:   Banlananların hepsi ilk 8.000'de olmayabilir! :(


Falathi
Gdzie mogę złożyć skargę na support?
arrow
17.07.2019 17:06:15
 
Subject: Gdzie mogę złożyć skargę na support?
Link on message: #17074098

View Postcpt_zgredQ, on 17 July 2019 - 10:03 AM, said: Witam jak wyżej w temacie proszę o podanie e-mailu jakiegoś decyzyjnego pracownika Wargaming, to się w supporcie dzieje to istny Monthy Pyton( wolałbym anglojęzycznego).

Falathi:   Proszę o PW. 


Actinid
L'épreuve du feu arrive sur la Carte Globale
arrow
17.07.2019 17:05:53
 
Subject: L'épreuve du feu arrive sur la Carte Globale
Link on message: #17074096

View Post0_Neill, on 17 July 2019 - 11:16 AM, said:   Il me semblais que c'était plutôt le 18 donc demain

Actinid:  

View PostRicky_Rolls, on 17 July 2019 - 11:20 AM, said: oui, sauf que sur le serveur russe c'était censé être le 18 aussi, sauf qu'eux ils l'ont eu hier, alors bon...

Actinid:   Je me suis renseigné, la demande a été faite cet après-midi.   Vous devrez recevoir les récompenses très bientôt (dans les heures qui suivent) ! Félicitations à vous !


Actinid
Soldes estivales : nouvelles offres
arrow
17.07.2019 14:17:46
 
Subject: Soldes estivales : nouvelles offres
Link on message: #17073506

View PostYannick22000, on 16 July 2019 - 10:31 AM, said: Pour le petit TD américain:   Ce sont les bons chiffres ? :teethhappy:


View PostDeTassigny, on 16 July 2019 - 11:47 AM, said: une fois de plus,   toujours hilarant de voir ce que sont les chars français dans WoT. - "un char puissant pour un modèle français", c'est dire ce qu'ils en pensent eux mêmes. - et n'oubliez jamais le fameux : "petit déjeuner de leurs homologues russes" - Berlin 2012, ....... etc....   seuls engins trouvant grâce à leurs yeux, les chars allemands, soit dit en passant, les faire valoirs des chars russes, (puisqu'ils les ont vaincus)   comparons 2 engins malgré la différence d'époque de conception : - l'AMX M4 mle 49 : Dégâts par minute : 1 747 PS/min (canon de 100 mm) 2.90 sec temps de visée, avec 190 mm caisse  et 250 mm tourelle de blindage frontal et 1500 points de structure, vitesse  40 km/h; portée de vue = 370. conçu après guerre (avec récupération des technologies des autres et donc comment expliquer les différences scandaleuses de temps de visée par exemple), et qu'on ne parle pas du fait qu'il n'est existé que sur papier quand on voit les chars polonais ..... - le Jagdtiger : Dégâts par minute : 2 823 PS/min (canon de 88 mm) 1.80 sec temps de visée, avec 250 mm de blindage frontal et aussi 1500 points de structure, vitesse 38 km/h, portée de vue = 390. né en 1945   gagnant sur tous les points : l'allemand (le plus ancien des 2) avec un peu plus de 1000 PS de dégâts minutes de mieux et ce avec un canon de calibre inférieur, presque 50% plus rapide à viser, et un blindage frontal homogène et efficace sans une caisse au blindage ridicule de face, pour l'AMX! (avec néanmoins 2 km/h de vitesse de pointe inférieure au français, oulalala)   on alignera pas le KV- 5 dans cette comparaison car malgré la grande différence d'époque de conception, le KV reste supérieur ou pour le moins égale, globalement, à la saleté Française proposé par WG.     s'en est à la limite de la discrimination !   vous êtes sérieux, Wargaming ? !!   écœurant.......   "pour votre winrate, roulez soviet"  

Actinid:   Autant je suis assez d'accord pour dire que certains chars FR ne sont plus dans la Meta, autant je trouve que tu exagères beaucoup.   AMX M4 51 : Excellent char avec bon blindage frontal et grosse tourelle. AMX 13 105: Le char léger du jeu ayant le plus gros potentiel de dégats. Son barillet est completement brutal une fois bien joué. B-c 25 t // Amx 50 B:  bien que ces chars ne soit plus autant joués que dans le passé ils restent toujours appréciés pour leur mobilité et leur barillet. Bien joués ces chars sont loins d'etre des fardeaux !   Bien entendu si tu compares un chasseur de char lourd de rang VIII à un char lourd de rang VIII la différence sera importante.   Pour ta comparaison avec le KV5 n'oublie pas de prendre en compte la mobilité, les weak spots et toutes les autres stats des deux véhicules: https://tanks.gg/com...v-5?t=amx-m4-49  


Falathi
Smak nostalgii: KV-122
arrow
17.07.2019 13:07:24
 
Subject: Smak nostalgii: KV-122
Link on message: #17073267

View PostAngel_of_Apocalipse, on 17 July 2019 - 11:06 AM, said: "KW Jeden Siemka" była tylko jedna :/

Falathi:   To prawda, dlatego KW-122 jest bardziej zbalansowany i nie tak przegięty jak dawny Sport.     


eekeeboo
WG? EVEN BLOODY ACTIONMAN GOT A SCORPION BRITISH LIGHT TANK !
arrow
17.07.2019 12:57:24
 
Subject: WG? EVEN BLOODY ACTIONMAN GOT A SCORPION BRITISH LIGHT TANK !
Link on message: #17073226

View PostSimeon85, on 17 July 2019 - 09:37 AM, said:   I am not sure this is something particularly to be proud of considering how obviously OP/bad many of the tanks were before release but still came out in that state.   Most of the informed playerbase said the 430U, Bobject, Maus buffs etc. were clearly too good before they were released, and they were right, and many of the playerbase said tanks like the tier 10 lights, FV4202, etc. would be bad on release on and they were right.    This current situation with the tier 10 British lights IMO makes the balance team look incompetent.  I get the idea of starting low and working up, but to chose that terrible state they chose as a starting point is just embarrassing IMO.  Anyone with even a passing interest and knowledge in the game could see these tanks were terrible and are in need of massive buffs.    And based on the current 2nd test 'buff' to the Manticore, we will need about 10 common tests before these tanks are competitive.   Putting out one of the worst tier 10s ever seen onto public test and then buffing it by tiny amounts is just insulting to the players who have given all their feedback on how bad it is. 

eekeeboo:   It's something to note when there's 500+ vehicles and a person indicates a handful were stronger than others. 


eekeeboo
Bringing Europe to WG Fest: Tanker's Day
arrow
17.07.2019 12:41:25
 
Subject: Bringing Europe to WG Fest: Tanker's Day
Link on message: #17073171

eekeeboo: I hope to see some of you there, but we plan to stream from there with some content on the way! 


eekeeboo
Are you guys having fun?
arrow
17.07.2019 12:20:43
 
Subject: Are you guys having fun?
Link on message: #17073106

View PostOUe_mistake_not, on 17 July 2019 - 08:20 AM, said:   Why do you keep ignoring the disparity between a purple WN8 and a exceptionally low WR?  You keep admitting that a high WN8 should correspond with a high WR but fail to address the disparity.  Clearly you are not going to admit that your MM is broken and that players are purposefully put on losing streaks, but you can't even come up with a good excuse for it!  

eekeeboo:   The reason i'm not "admitting" it, is there's nothing to admit. People who are good at the game have good winrates, because they are good at the game. Despite RNG and law of averages, people who are better at a game still generally do better than those who don't. It's not an excuse, it's a simple fact.   

View Post4nt, on 17 July 2019 - 09:02 AM, said: One can get purple wn8 and low WR easily from causality standpoint, but it does require skill in itself: it isn't really for someone who wouldn't get deep blue-light purple even without. The tactic requires understanding of how much a single player can effect the events leading to victory or loss.

Take a support tank, perferably TD (can also be done in few lights with good guns), play redline damage farming. Done. A player who dedicates one's performance for late game damage farming will, with enough aptitude in tanks he plays, get very high wn8s and low WR due to fact that one makes damage far too late to swing the battle.

eekeeboo:   Another also important note is, it's very difficult to get a "low" WR by getting high damage games. Overall through increased damage and optimal and efficient use of your HP vs the enemy, over time this can lead to a victory unless the enemy concentrates on capping, which most do not. That's why most good players have good winrates. If there was rigging, no one would be purple and no one would have over 50% winrate. 


Falathi
Pomysł na "nowe" tryby bitewne
arrow
17.07.2019 12:00:39
 
Subject: Pomysł na "nowe" tryby bitewne
Link on message: #17073023

View PostWlodi89LCT, on 17 July 2019 - 09:26 AM, said:   Jakoś na randomach brak balansu wam nie przeszkadza, bo nic z nim nie robicie... 

Falathi:   Bitwy historyczne oznaczają starcia w rodzaju: Jagdtiger vs Sherman z V tieru. Znajdź chętnych do gry Shermanem w takim układzie. 


parim1331
Clan Rivals: Zapiszcie się już teraz!
arrow
17.07.2019 11:58:40
 
Subject: Clan Rivals: Zapiszcie się już teraz!
Link on message: #17073001

View Postjedi_nedved, on 17 July 2019 - 09:12 AM, said: Ale rozczarowanie... Przeczytałem tytuł jako Chivas Regal: Napijcie się już teraz. Myślałem, że wreszcie coś ciekawego... :sceptic:

parim1331:   Jestem pewien, że to wydarzenie będzie równie, albo nawet bardziej ciekawe Niż Chivas! :izmena:


parim1331
As Pancerny Roman Orlik
arrow
17.07.2019 11:57:26
 
Subject: As Pancerny Roman Orlik
Link on message: #17072993

parim1331: Przy okazji, dla zainteresowanych dorzucam filmik w języku Angielskim:      


Falathi
STB-1 [tier X, średni]
arrow
17.07.2019 11:56:52
 
Subject: STB-1 [tier X, średni]
Link on message: #17072987

View PostFlyagaric, on 12 July 2019 - 12:45 PM, said: Czyli wolniejszy obrót, za jeszcze większe wychyły? Hmm, po co - przecież poprzednie zmiany zdają się trafione?

Falathi:   Trafione, ale powinny ułatwić grę. Np pomysł, żeby zawieszenie hydrauliczne działało do prędkości 30km/h powinien bardzo ułatwić korzystanie z niego :) 


parim1331
Frontline Offers: 50TP Prototyp & LT-432
arrow
17.07.2019 11:55:51
 
Subject: Frontline Offers: 50TP Prototyp & LT-432
Link on message: #17072981

View Postreddistic, on 15 July 2019 - 06:19 AM, said: Wheres ebr75

parim1331:   It was being sold not so long ago. Also, bit further down the road we had a marathon for it.


Falathi
As Pancerny Roman Orlik
arrow
17.07.2019 11:53:55
 
Subject: As Pancerny Roman Orlik
Link on message: #17072978

Falathi: Ten pomysł z konkursem brzmi dobrze. Coś wyrzeźbimy :) 


parim1331
A Taste of Nostalgia: The KV-122
arrow
17.07.2019 11:52:30
 
Subject: A Taste of Nostalgia: The KV-122
Link on message: #17072973

View PostGixxercho, on 17 July 2019 - 06:34 AM, said:   Guys, KV-1S was tier VI and was magnificent tank!

parim1331:   I member, I memeber!   The good 'ol KV-1S meta on VI tiers.


Falathi
Pomysł na "nowe" tryby bitewne
arrow
17.07.2019 11:22:31
 
Subject: Pomysł na "nowe" tryby bitewne
Link on message: #17072876

View Postprofes79, on 13 July 2019 - 02:53 PM, said:   PvE trochę w WoT brakuje - WoWs mimo wszystko odsiewa w ten sposób graczy bardzo casualowych a równocześnie daje możliwość wolniejszego przegrindowania jakiegoś upierdliwego modułu czy okrętu - a równocześnie często daje możliwość realizacji misji i wydarzeń.

Falathi:  

View PostUlthion, on 13 July 2019 - 05:00 PM, said:   To zależy jak dobre byłyby te boty. Bo to nie może być zbyt łatwe.

Falathi:  

View Postprofes79, on 13 July 2019 - 05:29 PM, said:   Przykłady gier scenariuszowych w WoWs pokazują, że przynajmniej tam ta implementacja botów i stopnia trudności gry scenariuszowej WG jako tako wyszła.

Falathi:   Pełna zgoda - samo wrzucenie botów to nie jest zbyt skomplikowana sprawa. Istotne jest to, w jaki sposób miałyby być wprowadzone tak żeby zachować pewien poziom wyzwania i żeby jednocześnie było to interesujące :) 

PS Swoją drogą ciągle uważam, że PVE byłby dobrym trybem do bitew historycznych, bo rozwiązuje problemy balansu i obsadzania słabszych czołgów. 


eekeeboo
A Taste of Nostalgia: The KV-122
arrow
17.07.2019 10:43:34
 
Subject: A Taste of Nostalgia: The KV-122
Link on message: #17072763

View PostSlyMeerkat, on 17 July 2019 - 07:41 AM, said: Had it from last time it was up i believe

eekeeboo:   nice!


eekeeboo
back to scool wg
arrow
17.07.2019 10:31:50
 
Subject: back to scool wg
Link on message: #17072750

eekeeboo: Going to go with a boop of nope on this.    Feedback is good you can find justification on some tank balance reasoning elsewhere. Otherwise, please refrain from insulting in you topic. 


eekeeboo
Are you guys having fun?
arrow
17.07.2019 10:21:54
 
Subject: Are you guys having fun?
Link on message: #17072729

View Postpsychobear, on 16 July 2019 - 10:34 PM, said:   Of course people have a short memory for all the changes that have taken place and only think about the ones that haven't. In this particular case it's only natural and there's a reason for it. It's becouse the changes that have taken place were either wrong ones or irrelevant ones. Or both. You guys keep fixing things that don't need fixing and making changes that nobody asked for, while completely ignoring the real problems which the playerbase have been pointing out to you all along. and then you act surprised that people don't appreciate the changes you make. This is just so rich that it would be funny if it wasn't so stupid. And yes, i know that game balancing on the scale of WoT is not an easy or fast task to perform, but that's under no circumstances an excuse for delaying it for years, while wasting resources on irrelevant things. 

eekeeboo: One of the changes for you that you consider wrong was the mm change? As from my experience in the community and talking to the player base on so many areas. "Fix mm" was one of the most spammed statements    Further to this with the onyoing changes to ammo and hp pools. When people ask for ammo to be looked at and for low tier games to be made fun and so forth. These are not irrelevant things. These are things you probably personally don't care about. But a great many others do.  07:23 Added after 1 minute

View Postgav00, on 16 July 2019 - 10:43 PM, said:   Did I claim that rigging was happening? No. I questioned whether the EU community guy has anything to do with the backend. Despite him saying that he does, i sincerely doubt it and he should not be making claims of which he does not have first-hand experience. The community team are the same people responsible for claiming how awesome British lights would be after all, they clearly have no connection to those who write the code. 22:47 Added after 3 minutes   You have literally not played this game, have you? Do you really think that all vehicles can pen each other reliably, and that all weakspots are easy to hit when fully aimed? 

eekeeboo:   You have literally not played this game, have you? Do you really think that all vehicles can pen each other reliably, and that all weakspots are easy to hit when fully aimed?    again please check the record. And you question my game knowlege about rigging. Please be aware of what you imply.  07:26 Added after 4 minutes

View PostHomer_J, on 17 July 2019 - 01:48 AM, said:   Same here and I really don't understand the mentality of people who are not having fun in randoms, not having fun in FL, not having fun in ranked yet will bang on trying to complete missions or whatever to get pixel tanks which they can only use in the same modes they don't have fun in.  It defies logic. And the "I've invested time/money into the game" line I see so often.  No you didn't you spent your free time and some disposable income on entertainment.  It's no different to a Netflix subscription.   I don't like some of the upcoming changes, will the result be a game breaker for me?  Probably not, I'll probably adapt and every so often go on about how the good old days with cross team chat and team damage were so much better but if it does ruin my enjoyment I'll just stop playing.

eekeeboo:   you sir are determined to wear out the button!   

View Postsabre_ferret, on 17 July 2019 - 06:51 AM, said:   You can't possibily be so dim as to think that someone getting purple stats can get <40% WR without the MM being the cause.  If I ran around team-killing everyone and decapping my own team I shouldn't be able to get that low a win rate.  You are either showing an incredible lack of knowledge or you are being dishonest.  

eekeeboo:   I didn't say that. Firstly purple stats intones xvm and not WG. But with the tools given....    People get "purple" because they understand elements of the game and know how to play it well. Whether seal clubbing, padding or just a really good player. Generally the better you are at a game... the more you win.    Please take the time to re-read what I said and if you are having difficulty understanding elements, please clarify which.    For more concise message =rigging does not exist.     


eekeeboo
WG fcked up with MM or its just once?
arrow
17.07.2019 10:15:13
 
Subject: WG fcked up with MM or its just once?
Link on message: #17072720

eekeeboo: Title alone warrants a boop of nope.   Please follow the forum rules on topic posting and language use. Furthermore I urge you to research more about the matchmaker and how it works.    Matchmaker works by tier and class at. "Stronk tonk" is not a category for mm.


eekeeboo
A Taste of Nostalgia: The KV-122
arrow
17.07.2019 10:12:35
 
Subject: A Taste of Nostalgia: The KV-122
Link on message: #17072716

View PostFriderik, on 17 July 2019 - 05:08 AM, said: Remember the glorious days when you could play regular tanks and enjoy the game, instead of have to buy premium tanks to be competitive?

eekeeboo:   That day is today! If you are having difficulties playing a tech tree vehicle, may I suggest you use one of the many guides around them from out wonderful community or you perhaps play something that suits your play style most?   

View Postwsatnutter, on 17 July 2019 - 05:55 AM, said: those were the days oh wait they knicked the KV1S off us

eekeeboo:   There was a very good reason for doing this!   

View PostSomnorila, on 17 July 2019 - 06:58 AM, said: It's tier 7 so wouldn't be better compared with IS? KV-1S doesn't exist anymore and was perceived as OP, thus advertising stuff based on an old perception seems pretty much a predatory tactic that has little to do with current state of events.

eekeeboo:   Sometimes many people appreciate the comparison to a vehicle players can relate to. Though not the same vehicle the tank does have a very similar play style and feel but doesn't have the stronk element to it! 


eekeeboo
Episode 6 Begins!
arrow
17.07.2019 01:29:16
 
Subject: Episode 6 Begins!
Link on message: #17072329

View Postvixu, on 16 July 2019 - 10:24 PM, said: As I've written somewhere, it is translation issue.

Russian words "оборудование" and "снаряжение" do both translate as "equipment" as the first pick. However, first one is more like modules, and second is more like supplies.

Direct translation from Russian site "который займёт один слот в панели снаряжения" is "which will occupy one of the equipment(supplies) panel slot".

Here you can see what is what:
https://worldoftanks.ru/ru/content/guide/newcomers-guide/upgrading_vehicles/

eekeeboo:   As I wrote above, that's what I said too, but I never say "I'm 100% certain" unless I've seen it for myself and know for absolute certain. My Yorkshire roots shining through, we're very literal about these things. 


eekeeboo
General feedback and suggestions
arrow
17.07.2019 01:28:12
 
Subject: General feedback and suggestions
Link on message: #17072327

View Postjaddra, on 15 July 2019 - 11:06 PM, said: Hello, the MM is completely trash - You broke it again. Whole day as -2 low tier? and absolutelly no game as +2 top tier? thank you for better and better game experience...

eekeeboo:   Nothing was changed about MM, May I suggest you take a break and consider you are noticing a trend because you're looking for one right now? 


eekeeboo
Are you guys having fun?
arrow
17.07.2019 01:21:53
 
Subject: Are you guys having fun?
Link on message: #17072314

View PostGkirmathal, on 16 July 2019 - 08:35 PM, said:   Good question, why would people pay? In my view people become willing to do purchases, if a game offers them a good enough healthy balance between enjoyment, a.k. positive 'frustration' and negative frustration factors.   Though I do not think premium account, and the perk it offers on progression vs free, gives a complete enough picture.     Yeah I agree with the function of WoT prem account in your example and what it gives. It can definitely increase part of the enjoyment players perceives in their progression through the game. I enjoyed the few free prem days given :) and I was inclined to perhaps get some prem time for an ongoing grind.   But due to some of those negative frustration factors I regretfully became reluctant again. A WoT premium account for me does not offset enough some of those negatives factors. That by design cannot be influenced (luckily!) by a player, but does induce frustration in players.   I think that for a lot of players that is a contributing factor why some takes frequent breaks or just leave (invested or not) all together.

eekeeboo:   Many games do well with "goodwill" purchases I will call them. But consider the age of this game and how long it has been going. The age of the game affects the strategies you can use for games like this.    Part of the frustration with WoT is inherant in the game from a time in Free to Play games looked very different to modern free-to-play and the grinding of course is always going to cause elements of frustration.    The best we can do is try and get the balance while keeping the developers fed and working while making sure the playerbase is happy enough to play but inclined to pay into the game :) Occasionally you can drop a plate, but it's a tight balance to get right. That's why feedback is important and discussions like this invaluable in helping the communication :)   

View Postsabre_ferret, on 16 July 2019 - 08:46 PM, said:   Yeah, purple stats = repeated errors.  Do you even play the game?

eekeeboo:   Yes I do, you can see the number of my battles below my name readily, may i suggest you take a peek. The rest of the sentence.... I'm not entirely sure your statement or what you're trying to establish? Can you please clarify?   

View PostLeroy_Jenkinss, on 16 July 2019 - 09:21 PM, said:   Come on dude back in the LoL when there was still IP system you could buy runes dirt cheap for IP you got really fast.Rune pages was expensive to buy for IP and RP and only advantage they give you was a tiny bit of flexibility when in champ select and i can bet you 95% of playerbase back then was having two rune pages like me and yet even with two rune pages you could still replace the runes anytime you want in your rune pages but not when you was already in the lobby for game.People complain about that and what Riot did, they removed Runes and now we have only mastery that is free and fully unlocked day one. One thing that is also good with LoL is that you can buy any champ with real money anytime and yet Riot are constantly buffing and nerfing those champs without hesitation for game balance and WG cant do the same with premium tanks is beyond my mind but OK.   AT8 and weakspots dude do you play this  game AT8 have only one weak spot frontally on commander hatch that is still 152mm thick that you need to hit in the center to be able to pen rest of tank front is 203mm flat.Im somewhat ok with RNG if RNG is true RNG and not a tool to help those 45% to hit shoots on the move and pen things they aren't suposed to pen. Im sure this game is rigged to pull everyone to that 50%    I remember once a SU 152 pen my jumbo uper plate that was angled so hard that was an autobounce for every round in the game to bait a shot and win the game and yet somehow dude pen about 175 mm effective well angled armor with its 135mm of pen on its AP rounds and no he didn't overmatch anything he just flush hit my uper plate and left me on  like 12 hp and i just stop and look like WHAT how. Surprise Surprise dude was 42% player i wonder how he pen that hmmmmmm. Only thing i'm sure about that i never ever raged in any game before i installed WoT on my comp or break any hardware. Now i can say i break 3 keyboards playing WoT.    

eekeeboo:   You could buy with Real money, but the point still remains it cost real money, and those people buying those had a much higher advantage over those that didn't. More so when new sets were released. Playing ranked in those days for instance was an absolute nightmare when you had to combine tier 1s into 2's and 2s into 3's and hope you got the right position or you were doomed. I too played the game from the very beginning when ADC went mid. I remember the pain at the time of grinding as a free to play player there too, and as soon as you put money there with the level and xp boosters for instance, life became signficantly easier, being able to buy the new champions faster etc.    2 rune pages was definitely how you would lose, when you start getting to the old levels of what is now Diamond, without multiple Rune pages you stood very little change of maintaining your elo.    The champion balance is something they're excellent on, but at the same time they have a champ banning system for those they miss in most games now, you have role selection and a large part of the game is meta shifting. Seasons of ADC then Bruiser, then assassin and so forth. It's a little easier when it's usually the item changes that will swing these shifts.    For the weakspots I can only suggest you use one of the many 3D model sites now available and review the big shiny easy pent spots :) If he's able to pen you that reliably, then you will be able to him also with sufficient aim. But again if you'd like further assistance this will require a replay I'm sorry to say.    I do need to highlight once more, there is no rigging, at all, in any shape.   

View Postpsychobear, on 16 July 2019 - 09:40 PM, said:   MM fixes? Thought you guys have fixed the MM. Are you working on it again? Should we expect a well balanced MM in say a couple of years time? Or more? Tank rebalance? If i remember correctly, you started a big rebalance process when Sandbox was first launched, some years ago. Started with tier 10 and said once that was fixed, you'd move down the tiers and balance everything. In fact, all you've managed to achieve was f*ck up tier 10 balance even more, making the tier virtually unplayable. Then you've stopped and completely forgot about the whole balancing thing. Should we expect the same this time? I definitely think so. Friendly fire removal? That's not needed and won't fix any of the core problems of the game. But hey, "fixing" unnecesary things while completely ignoring the real problems is one of the core traits of your company, so that's that. A whole host of other changes this yet alone? Lots of words for saying nothing, don't you think?   And by the way, when are you going to address the artillery problem?!!!    Sorry for the maybe harsh tone, but you guys should really consider one thing: our patience has limits too, and it seems that more and more of us are just about reaching them, which directly reflects into dropping of player numbers as well as dropping of paying players numbers. If nothing else, that should at least be of concern to you. But it looks like it isn't. Oh well.

eekeeboo:   You mentioned a lack of work to help improve the game, the MM changes are part of those and continue to be monitored and improved all the time.    For the tanks to be rebalanced, I suggest you review the WG fest announcement. Reddit QnA and AMA, alternatively you can see the super-test news, common test news and the sandbox news on tank balancing as a whole with hp and shells as well as lines like the Swedish heavies the German mediums and so forth.    I understand some frustration, but unfortunately people have a short memory for all the changes that have taken place and only think about the ones that haven't. No matter how much work is done and how many improvements are rolled out, it's always "But what about......" As I'm sure you can imagine, game balancing on a scale of WoT with all the variables is not an easy or fast task to perform.   

View PostTungstenHitman, on 16 July 2019 - 09:46 PM, said: Not too much lately I don't know is it school kids or what but the standard is really bad and teammates are the biggest problem for me at the moment they either follow me or grief. Not only clueless but a sh*tty "this is my spot!" boom! sort of attitude to go with along with pushers and blockers just really a lot lately no wonder they are bringing in a no team damage soon since they must be inundated with tickets and player numbers dropping from bans and I eventually get tilted myself obviously there's only so many battles of that sort of snotty childish clueless guff you can take before you have enough and stop playing for the evening. I hope things settle down again soon.

eekeeboo:   I can tell you that exam season is nigh and that school holidays are fast approaching if not already with college and Universities out for the Summer. Maybe this shift in the players is something you may notice while others are busy with exams and enjoying the nice weather and going on holiday too :)       


eekeeboo
Yet another horrible example of WG thinking? Using loopholes..
arrow
17.07.2019 00:56:36
 
Subject: Yet another horrible example of WG thinking? Using loopholes..
Link on message: #17072287

View PostSnoregasm2, on 16 July 2019 - 09:55 PM, said:   Fair enough - my apologies.   At least you've deleted the worst of his ramblings . . .

eekeeboo:   I'm trying to work my way through the thread, trying to be fair about this and I understand this is a sensitive part, I'm only just joining this discussion so retroactively going to clean the topic, but about 1 more post being offensive from a boop of nope!    OK - please keep on topic people and civil thank you! 


eekeeboo
Yet another horrible example of WG thinking? Using loopholes..
arrow
17.07.2019 00:44:43
 
Subject: Yet another horrible example of WG thinking? Using loopholes..
Link on message: #17072270

View PostSnoregasm2, on 16 July 2019 - 06:33 PM, said:  

eekeeboo:   Please refrain from being insulting and rude.    EDIT: I can see I'm late to the personal attack party! Please everyone refrain from attacks and on-topic while i break out the invisi-broom! 


eekeeboo
Episode 6 Begins!
arrow
17.07.2019 00:38:13
 
Subject: Episode 6 Begins!
Link on message: #17072259

View PostHomer_J, on 16 July 2019 - 09:03 PM, said:   Good to see you back on the forums, I was starting to think we had been abandoned. :great:   Plz can I have more likes though. :)

eekeeboo:   :D I'm here in a voluntary capacity to check in on all of you (whom i miss greatly!) 


Sael_
How to remain calm at all times.
arrow
17.07.2019 00:07:20
 
Subject: How to remain calm at all times.
Link on message: #17072201

View PostFluffyRedFox, on 16 July 2019 - 07:08 PM, said: get cat pet cat you are now ok

Sael_:  

View Posteekeeboo, on 16 July 2019 - 07:15 PM, said:   dogs are better! 

Sael_:   Immagine correlata


eekeeboo
Are you guys having fun?
arrow
16.07.2019 23:30:33
 
Subject: Are you guys having fun?
Link on message: #17072134

View PostLeroy_Jenkinss, on 16 July 2019 - 08:07 PM, said:   Yeah that's not true my boy. I'm sure i didn't spend a single cent of League of Legends in 8 years of playing that game and i love that game today same as the first day.But you give me great idea eek i will go from this forum right now log into my League account and go spend some money for skins beacuse that's how online free to play games should be monetized. This game just throws everything through a window that i learned in my 20+ years of gaming.And that is no matter how much you skill have in WoT you can throw that all out of window when there is a RNG there is no consistency in this game.   I got penned 7 times in row by Achilles while i was driving my AT8 at max render distance dude was just spamming APCR from 600m and not  a single bounce while i was just angling my front plate more and more and more to see how much this BS called RNG can crapon someone. Next game me in AT8 against enemy AT8 perfect time to test this RNG BS i bounced 6 times in a row on front plate of AT8 while having same gun and APCR as Achilles from less than 100m. And in that moment i just ALT F4 game   Me the guy who was playing CS 1.6 professionally for 10 years, who pulled insane clutches back in the days, who won countless tournaments is just slap in the face on me and my intelligence to play this game.   I didn't touch this game 3 months and i plan to stay that way.

eekeeboo:   As you may well remember with LoL the old system was designed to frustrate you with the grind into buying the runes/rune pages and even levelling up. You will also remember those good old days when new champs came out and how much fun you generally had when you were on the free-to-play rotation without a selection of champions handy. LoL was able to build up a huge playerbase with all of this which enables to go into the model they have no which still has some questionable elements.    The simple matter is, most free to play games that are only cosmetic dependent on sales do not generally last as long as Tanks has with as large and healthy a monetisation and player base. There is skill required to do well at the game, with or without RNG. RNG overall is pretty much required if you want to have an element of unpredictability about things. Love it or hate it, when it's a simple case of math "this shell will pen and do this damage" you quickly remove any element of excitement or challenge. That you need for a game to stay engaging in the long run.    For the APCR, the angling of an AT8 is difficult when you consider the numerous weakspots on the tank, at range or not. You can take the time to learn those moments and overcome or remain frustrated. But I would be most interested to see your replay for your absolute worst luck possible for those 6 bounces when aimed properly and correctly at the tank or the weakspots.    I am sure you were a good CS 1.6 player, but Tanks requires a different set of skills, play style and strategy than CS. You can retain map awareness to an element, but not many other things transfer than perhaps reaction rates which is trumped by tank knowledge, weakspot and the ability to relocate and work as a team. 


eekeeboo
WG? EVEN BLOODY ACTIONMAN GOT A SCORPION BRITISH LIGHT TANK !
arrow
16.07.2019 23:24:02
 
Subject: WG? EVEN BLOODY ACTIONMAN GOT A SCORPION BRITISH LIGHT TANK !
Link on message: #17072118

View PostTramp_In_Armour, on 16 July 2019 - 07:48 PM, said: If they introduced a FV101 Scorpion as a premium, I'd snap it up. Take my money, WG!   The current things on offer don't really look properly British, except maybe the hull of one of them. They look more like French lights. The US get the Bulldog and the Sheridan. Why do we get weird blueprint tanks that were probably rejected before teatime and look nothing like what we did have?

eekeeboo:   Never say never!     


eekeeboo
When is WG finally going to tell trash players that win in Frontline gives no...
arrow
16.07.2019 23:23:16
 
Subject: When is WG finally going to tell trash players that win in Frontline gives no...
Link on message: #17072117

eekeeboo: Please feel free to add your feedback to the feedback thread and not create another thread. Thank-you.    P.S. Boop of nope. 


eekeeboo
I don't like arties?
arrow
16.07.2019 22:45:22
 
Subject: I don't like arties?
Link on message: #17072031

eekeeboo: Boop of Nope


eekeeboo
How to remain calm at all times.
arrow
16.07.2019 22:36:27
 
Subject: How to remain calm at all times.
Link on message: #17072027

eekeeboo: Important thing to remember to all cat lovers.... You can't do this with a cat and keep your hands!   


Реклама | Adv