Wot-news - Office development server us 77080

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 22:31:05

Subject: WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #337728

MrVic: Corrected some links Ty Gunkata for the heads up

Overlord

World of tanks language

03.01.2011 22:18:52

Subject:

Archives\Beta\World of tanks language
Link on message: #337705

Overlord: Italian version of WOT will be added shortly.

MrVic

Archive of WoT Newsletters

03.01.2011 21:32:55

Subject:

News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\Archive of WoT Newsletters
Link on message: #337608

MrVic

Archive of WoT Newsletters

03.01.2011 21:32:55

Subject: Archive of WoT Newsletters
Link on message: #337608

MrVic

Archive of WoT Newsletters

03.01.2011 21:32:55

Subject: Archive of WoT Newsletters
Link on message: #337608

ARGO

Some form of reputation

03.01.2011 21:23:24

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Some form of reputation
Link on message: #337584

bat21zing, on 03 January 2011 - 09:11 PM, said: I'm really sick of playing with people that aren't aggressive, that suicide, heavy tank players that hide behind meds, those that intentionally block you when you try to back up (Another form of TKing really leaving you exposed to the other teams fire), that can't shoot, that camp, that are scared to move, that can't drive and smash into you seconds into the battle destroying your tracks... etc...
One of the real problems right now is that players don't need to worry about their reputation. They can do whatever they please with little effect to them. We lack an ignore list. So even players that try TK you at the beginning of the battle could show up with you in the next one. We really need to be able to ignore players that we'd rather not play with. Players would then need to think about their actions or lack there of. The afkers could be avoided and those that appear to be bots (maybe they are just really bad players who drive ahead in the strait line and die at the start of the match... without getting a shot off. The jury is out on this one) There isn't an easy way to group up right now. More support needs to be added to create groups of players you want todo battle with and the ability to ignore those you'd rather never see again.

ARGO: If regular standard matches makes you unhappy, then if I were you I would try out platoon or company mode and form up your own team that way your only dealing with players you trust.

ARGO

lack of agression in game

03.01.2011 21:06:52

Subject:

Archives\Beta\lack of agression in game
Link on message: #337542

ARGO: There are certain factors that demand certain behavior, I will use myself as an example: Although I am a big fan of defending and reducing tank numbers, Certain maps tell me how to act / plan:
Malnovka = Camp a bit, pick off what I can reduce enemy #s then go on attack HOWEVER, If is see in the start up screen that the balance Gods have smiled on our sides equiptment I would be 1st to see if my team mates want to charge across the field.
El Halif = Defenders and snipers paradise, This map is a favorite of mine because it really makes you have to think becaue you know they will attack in force and try and pick you apart but you also can get them as they attempt the hills so in this map, it's anyones game and also a real nailbiter at times.
Himmelsdorf / Ruinberg = Attack, Attack, Attack, These are maps you do not want to get caught with your pants down because it's way to easy to flank and get tied up.
Now with that said, I do have to say that it's always so easy to blame arty or cry about OP tanks but the simple truth is, It's not what you have....It's how you use it that decieds victory. I have been on the losing end of battles where we clearly had a far better fighting force due to the enemy communicating better. I don't give a rat's arse how many arty the other side has because If your team wants to kill those arty, they have the tools "scouts" and I have to say I don't see many leopards doing it anymore and I will say that when they were popular they were making Artys life a living hell. But anyway I have said it before and I will say it to my dying day that good communication and working a plan together wins wars.

ARGO

Need help with IS-3

03.01.2011 17:39:13

Subject:

In-Game Vehicles\Soviet Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\Need help with IS-3
Link on message: #337090

DeathsArrow, on 03 January 2011 - 05:13 PM, said: I'm in the same boat, and I think I'm going use up some free XP to get the BL9 quicker.

ARGO: Save your gold, If you want to capitalize while grinding for your BL9, Work smarter not harder. The BL9 although a great gun is not exactly the best at range and does bounce a lot....SO...If you want to make this gun work well you should also get a gun rammer, laying drive, and a verticle stabilizer to make the most out of the BL9. I know you may think that wasting 3 good slots that can be used for other things, but the IS3 is a fast heavy and properly camoed it can now be a deadly sniper that can also run like hell while firing on the fly if need be.

merig00

Can i backup wot?

03.01.2011 17:18:30

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Questions\Can i backup wot?
Link on message: #337038

merig00: All your information except settings is saved on the server so you don't need to back up anything. If you made some custom changes to your video quality then just save the preferences.xml file. That's it.

merig00

Do we need Linux port?

03.01.2011 17:13:36

Subject:

Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Do we need Linux port?
Link on message: #337024

merig00: Hi guys and gals. What do you think about an idea of porting WoT to Linux. Would you like it? Is it a viable project? Please leave your input in the comments. Would you play WoT on Linux? Would you be able to help out and volunteer your time and knowledge in case developers decide to port WoT to Linux?

merig00

Do we need Linux port?

03.01.2011 17:13:36

Subject: Do we need Linux port?
Link on message: #337024

merig00: Hi guys and gals. What do you think about an idea of porting WoT to Linux. Would you like it? Is it a viable project? Please leave your input in the comments. Would you play WoT on Linux? Would you be able to help out and volunteer your time and knowledge in case developers decide to port WoT to Linux?

Overlord

Moderator Appointments

03.01.2011 17:10:48

Subject:

Archives\Junkyard\Moderator Appointments
Link on message: #337013

Overlord: Mostly on the basis of this thread
Changes in Moderating team:
Group Moderators - in:
EndlessWaves
Haschem
JanTjarks
n1sK
Punisher_1
SiberianExpress
Group Chat Moderators - in:
lordduck1
Super Moderators moderate all the forums and game chat.
Moderators moderate one or several forums/sections and game chat.
Chat Moderators moderate game chats only.

Overlord

"Scout" not getting awarded?

03.01.2011 16:14:21

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Questions\"Scout" not getting awarded?
Link on message: #336891

Hethwill, on 03 January 2011 - 01:40 PM, said: You must survive.

Overlord: That's not obligatory.

Overlord

"Scout" not getting awarded?

03.01.2011 16:13:23

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Questions\"Scout" not getting awarded?
Link on message: #336886

dawniezinha, on 03 January 2011 - 11:48 AM, said: Are you sure the team has to win? Now I got curious, I guess they forgot to update the Achievements list on the website if that's true!

Overlord: Updated achievements on the web site according to the patch notes.
- "Scout" is now awarded only if the team won.
- "Sniper" is now awarded if during the battle there was no friendly damage.

Overlord

Armor skirts, Additional Armor Plates and Ammunition Change suggestions.

03.01.2011 13:23:03

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Suggestions\Armor skirts, Additional Armor Plates and Ammunition Change suggestions.
Link on message: #336561

Haineko, on 02 January 2011 - 04:04 PM, said: I have four topics that i wish to talk about.
First of, side skirts, secondly, Additional Armor, thirdly the damage of ammunition and possible changes in it. Last of all, module damage and how to deal with it.
First topic:
Side skirts. I have seen this in many threads and I've come to realise that even though most tanks of WW2 had these, most tanks in game haven't. So, perhaps these could be a researchable item for the tanks as a separate and completly optional part which doesn't contribute to elite status. Perhaps added AFTER the tank is Elite?.
Second topic:
Additional Armor Plates. Just like the side skirts these can be offered to tanks as an additional research, optional, and not contribute towards wether the tank is elite or not. Four research stages of 5mm, 10mm, 15mm and 20mm plates ranging from 1k, 4k, 7k and 10k experience. (Mere suggestions on where i could see these be in terms of XP cost.)
Also, different effectiveness and materials for all teams. The germans gain metal plates, the US gets the usual sandbags wich you often see on Shermans and the USSR gains wooden logs, wich was mounted by the Finnish during the Winter War, but i figured that since the countries are neighbours maybe the USSR can have that in game.
Stats for these would be the germans gaining the heaviest, most expensive and most effective ones, the USA would have sandbags, less effective, cheaper and less weight. The USSR with the logs would be heavier then the sand bags, cheaper then the sandbags and slightly less effective.
Third topic:
This one is the most important one for me. At the moment i often see HE shells do more damage than AP shells. Of course not with my guns as i use the 75mm L/70. But my suggestion is as this, damage scales with piercing. If a rounds pierces, it hurts. If it doesnt pierce, it simply deals damage to OUTER modules depending on were it hits.
Fourth topic:
Modules today are too easily destroyed or damaged. Personally i suggest that when a module is destroyed, it's final. Unrepairable unless you have a repair kit. This of course calls for a lot more carefullness when playing and tactics when playing, as right now the high tier tanks blaze through the fields, they shoot things, get tracked, get it repaired and then continue. With my suggestion a damaged track will remain damaged and will make sure that the person sitting behind the sticks will be a lit more carefull. Of course this would call for a much harder target to hit, thus the side skirts i mentioned above, and a lot harder to destroy the tracks and modules themselves.
Cheers
Haineki
:Smile_honoring:

Overlord: 1. Likely to be added.
2. Will be added. Haven't decided on the way it is going to be done yet.
3. http://forum.worldof...post__p__336521
4. -

Overlord

@ Overlord question on Centurion MK3

03.01.2011 13:20:51

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Questions\@ Overlord question on Centurion MK3
Link on message: #336555

Cragarion, on 02 January 2011 - 10:49 PM, said: Hi tried to post this in the proper questions section but for some reason it was not allowed

.
Hi the Centurion MK3's made in 1948 were fitted with the fully automatic stabilisation system for the main cannon,
this is the system that kept the gun perfectly level no matter what kind of terrain the tank was going over,
none of the tanks ingame at the moment have this system the guns bounce all over the place when we go over the plowed fields or railway lines or any bumpy ground.
So first question will the centurions be fitted with the fully automatic stabilisation system.
Also the centurion tanks had a unique range finding system where a machine gun was mounted with the main gun,
this meant all the gunner had to do to find the exact range to target was fire some tracer rounds from the machine gun at the target and the second they hit the target fire the main gun,
this gave the centurion a hit ratio of about 99.5%,
higher than any other tank in the world at the time,
So second question will the centurion have a much higher hit ratio ingame to the other tanks.
It was these 2 unique systems that allowed 2 centurion tanks in the Yom Kippur War to defend aginst 120 soviet built T-62s destroying over 60 of them,
and in the same war 100 centurions defeat 500 soviet built T-55s and T-62s of course they were later model centurions.
You can get some more info on the centurion from my post in this thread here LINK

Overlord: Moved to questions.
Can't give any exact information on how British tanks are going to be implemented in game. At the moment the tech tree itself is being finalized.
Centurion Mk3 is likely to become tier 9 medium.

Overlord

How does HE damage actually work?

03.01.2011 12:59:54

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Questions\How does HE damage actually work?
Link on message: #336521

Overlord: How HE damage works. Brief description:
1. If HE shell managed to penetrate the armor.
- Similar to AP shell, it goes inside the vehicle and explodes there.
- Full damage according to the specs is inflicted, plus HE deals additional damage to internal modules and/or crew. Apart from its basic damage value, each shell has additional value that determines possible damage to crew/internal modules if penetration was successful.
2. If HE shell didn't manage to penetrate or exploded near the tank (eg SPG shot)
- If the explosion took place directly on the armor the damage is reduced by 50%, if the explosion took place near the tank the damage is reduced by 50% plus it gets some extra reduction depending on distance to vehicle.
- Heat wave of HE shell "seeks for" soft spot on the armor, where it is possible to penetrate. Heat wave makes cone-shaped aperture in the armor with approx 45 deg cone angle.
- Vehicle's armor partly absorbs heat damage (each tanks has its own value), including installed spall liner.
- Heat wave damages crew and decreases vehicle's hit points. Modules are not damaged.

Overlord

Fadin's medal

03.01.2011 12:38:18

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Fadin's medal
Link on message: #336488

Overlord: Fadin's medal is working fine. So far we haven't got any evidence that is bugged in any way.

Overlord

Match-Making System

03.01.2011 11:59:51

Subject:

News from the Front\Developers Break Down Game Mechanics\Match-Making System
Link on message: #336432

Overlord: Match-making chart v.0.6.2.8
not relevant in current version
Posted Image

How this works:
Match-making system defines type and tier of every single vehicle. E.g. T-29 - tier 7 heavy tank.
See 7-heavy line and find out which battle tier spread it has. In our example, from 6 to 10.
The exact battle tier is chosen on a random basis. E.g. 7.
Then match-making system begins processing the waiting queue, and chooses the tanks that can participate in tier 7 battles (7th column) and makes up 2 teams from them.
Topic for feedback and impressions.

Overlord

Official Matchmaking Discussion Thread

03.01.2011 11:58:04

Subject:

Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Official Matchmaking Discussion Thread
Link on message: #336428

digitusx82, on 02 January 2011 - 11:22 AM, said: If you look carefully to the match-making grid (http://forum.worldof...post__p__310769), the A-20 (being a lvl 4 light) could even fight a Maus or an IS-7 (lvl 10 heavies).
So in this respect the system is not broken; someone can argue if it's good or not being thrown in the middle of super-heavies with only one task: run as hell, scout them and explode in a fireball.

Overlord: See the updated chart:
http://forum.worldof...post__p__324234

Overlord

Russian Tanks, Belarus Devs

03.01.2011 11:36:41

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Russian Tanks, Belarus Devs
Link on message: #336400

Panzerkraker, on 02 January 2011 - 07:50 PM, said: rofl at this very thread trying to justify the OPness of russian tanks artificially brought in the game by pro russian devs. To kids which only read books and watch only national TV=>Belarus was a part of CCCP/USSR and is still nowdays in good relations with russia and is trying to keep it so.Belarussians took part in WW2 as red army soldiers and putting own nations tanks in bad light wouldn't be something someone would ever do, whoever you are japanese,german or russian because in everyone of us has still a part of PATRIOTISM something we all have but some show it less than others.I have done the entire soviet line from begin till end on heavy and mostly on med(+arty) and know how it is in comparison to US or Ger.USSR=one nation even if it was a union of more countries because even nowdays belarussians,ukrainians,russians and tons of ex-soviet republics call eachother brothers despite the politics might show something else but don't forget its the nation that counts and not few politics sitting in their chair and eating money.Also my observations show that I'm right since everyone of us likes to go the easy way which explains why we got much more russian tanks than any other.

Overlord: Belarus used to be a part of the USSR. As well as 14 other countries. This doen's confirm any bias by itself.
Belarusians took part in WWII fighting both sides, but mostly as Read Army, which was quite understandable.
Regarding calling other nations "brothers", I wouldn't generalize. Things are more complicated nowadays. It's not the question of black or white, ally or enemy anymore. Cold War is over.
With this post, lets close the off-topic discussion of politics and any other stuff not related to the game.
Have no idea "where we got much more russian tanks than any other". Are you playing closed beta or Russian version?

Overlord

Russian Tanks, Belarus Devs

03.01.2011 11:17:54

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Russian Tanks, Belarus Devs
Link on message: #336377

ComfortablyApathetic, on 02 January 2011 - 08:25 AM, said: Part 1: Russian Bias--
In every game I've ever played, people complain about imbalance, whether there is any or not. In Eve, some say minmatar are overpowered because of speed, amarr is overpowered because of best dps at range, caldari is overpowered BECAUSE OF FALCON, etc. Also, most video game communities are angst-filled and miss no opportunity to jump at the devs' throats. However, the WoT community takes it a step further. I mean, of course people have always thought the other side was overpowered, but I've never seen anything like, "CCP refuse to buff Caldari because they're asian and inferior to the Nordic master race." I've seen every developer flamed for incompetence and not listening to its community, but for people to accuse Wargaming.net of video game balance conspiracies? It blows my mind how idiotic people can be. One post said that the tank stats shown in game are likely fake, and that in reality they massively favor Russian tanks, and Wargaming are trying to cover up their evil scheme. When Overlord locked this thread with a tongue-in-cheek response, he got -75 or so forum votes, which speaks about the popular opinion on the forums.
...

Overlord: When I saw the headline of this topic, thought it would be "Russian Devs, Russian tanks" part 2. Unexpected contents.
Thanks for support.

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 05:05:01

Subject:

News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #335954

sharpeh, on 03 January 2011 - 04:13 AM, said: oops, can I retake mine?

MrVic: Its logged already shouldn't be to much difference overall

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 05:05:01

Subject: WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #335954

sharpeh, on Jan 03 2011 - 03:13, said: oops, can I retake mine?

MrVic: Its logged already shouldn't be to much difference overall

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 05:05:01

Subject: WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #335954

sharpeh, on Jan 03 2011 - 03:13, said: oops, can I retake mine?

MrVic: Its logged already shouldn't be to much difference overall

MrVic

Invisible tanks

03.01.2011 01:10:07

Subject:

Archives\Junkyard\Invisible tanks
Link on message: #335578

MrVic: Closing, wrong section, also topics pinned and running on these topics, please post in those MrVic

MrVic

World of Camp or World of Invisible tanks

03.01.2011 01:07:43

Subject:

Archives\Junkyard\World of Camp or World of Invisible tanks
Link on message: #335567

MrVic: Closing, wrong section, also topics pinned and running on these topics, please post in those

MrVic

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 00:42:59

Subject:

News from the Front\World of Tanks Newsletter\WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #335500

BishopMiles, on 02 January 2011 - 06:33 PM, said: The survey has a lot of flaws and options I don't want to choose because I don't like any of them

MrVic: Only the first question was required you can leave any others blank if you do not like a choice

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 00:42:59

Subject: WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #335500

BishopMiles, on Jan 02 2011 - 17:33, said: The survey has a lot of flaws and options I don't want to choose because I don't like any of them

MrVic: Only the first question was required you can leave any others blank if you do not like a choice

MrVic

WoT Newsletter Volume #6

03.01.2011 00:42:59

Subject: WoT Newsletter Volume #6
Link on message: #335500

BishopMiles, on Jan 02 2011 - 17:33, said: The survey has a lot of flaws and options I don't want to choose because I don't like any of them

MrVic: Only the first question was required you can leave any others blank if you do not like a choice

ARGO

Overzealous Moderators

01.01.2011 04:51:49

Subject:

Archives\Junkyard\Overzealous Moderators
Link on message: #331790

Hoffburger, on 01 January 2011 - 04:33 AM, said: Meh, I had a rant in here, but I'll shorten it:
Basically don't talk about any criticisms you have with the game at all. Only give these criticisms to gaming websites and your friends, because the developers don't want to hear it even though you are a beta tester. If you criticize the game at all you will get a chat ban.

ARGO: For starters I will make this short and sweet, No one gets banned for insightful, meaningful, critique. They get banned for creating posts much like this one attempting to insight drama which you have attempted to do here. Re-read your forums rules and if you do have an opinion regarding gameplay make sure that you title it and post it properly and in the proper place.
Take this as a friendly warning
THIS POST IS CLOSED AND SENT TO THE JUNKYARD
Argo66

Tanitha

Happy New Year!

01.01.2011 00:09:08

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Happy New Year!
Link on message: #331402

Tanitha: Yay 1 million players..!
Thanks boss, Happy new years to the WOT team, and all the players, as well.

Overlord

Happy New Year!

31.12.2010 23:50:09

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Happy New Year!
Link on message: #331373

Overlord: Hello,
I'd like to wish everybody Happy New Year.
Thanks for your time and effort, together we can develop the project further.
We are happy, that the game has become quite popular and (with your help) we have achieved 1.000.000 players world wide.
To be honest we didn't expect the things would go so smooth.
The game changed to a great extent in 2010. At the beginning of the year we had about 5 tanks, 2-3 maps, and clumsy UI.
No upgrades, achievements, detailed damage model, tech tress, statisitics, destruction system. Almost nothing.
In July we have started international closed beta, initially on European servers, in Septepmber we switched to North American hardware.
We strongly believe the project will grow and develop even faster in the upcoming year.
Currently in development: clan wars, reworked visibility and spotting system, new vehicle movement physics, new crew skills, French tanks and US TDs, bigger maps (2x2 km), and of course new server capacities both in Europe and North America.
All the above and many other things will be implemented in 2011.
Moreover, here I'd like to apologize for all the problems you had an are having to overcome at the moment: lags, bugs, insufficient server capacity, break in beta test caused by switching from Europe to North America, possible lack of information and communication on the project, delays in maintenance, non-simultaneous patching with RU and late release of special festive patch.
This is our first online-project and we are constantly causing a backflash developing it. For sure we are doing and will be doing our best to deliver the product of extremely high quality and not to repeat our past mistakes.
The bottom line of this is the following: stay with in 2011 and you'll never regret it.
Happy New Year, tankers! Will catch up with you in 2011.
These are my personal congratulations. Having got some free minutes, I've realized that I must say something of that kind.

Tanitha

world alert lvls

31.12.2010 22:16:35

Subject:

Archives\Junkyard\world alert lvls
Link on message: #331256

silverz, on 31 December 2010 - 05:55 PM, said: Australia
Australia, meanwhile, has raised its security level from "No worries" to "She'll be alright, mate." Three more escalation levels remain: "Crikey!", "I think we'll need to cancel the barbie this weekend" and "The barbie is cancelled." So far no situation has ever warranted use of the final escalation level.

Tanitha: Being an Australian, Id have to agree with this bit : ) ...
In general, I found your post humorous, and in general I'm not really that "politically correct".
However, as a moderator, employed to do a job, I'm required to do that job unbiasedly.
Its not about what I find humorous and acceptable, its about, me enforcing the rules of WOT.
Racist jokes, whether humorous to some, offensive to others, are still what they are, which is racist.
I think the main problem with your post, is the run and hide, french section. With the introduction of the french tanks soon to wot, there already has been 1001+ bad tasting french jokes. And enough is enough. Being unbiased, its not my position to allow some racist jokes, and not others.
So, thread locked, and dumped to the junkyard section.
No Ro bans places at this time. But no more racist jokes please. Its a international forum. And it needs to be fun for all. Not fun at the expense of some.
Regards.

Tanitha

Black Screen After Loading

31.12.2010 21:47:01

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Black Screen After Loading
Link on message: #331208

Tanitha: What didn't work?
Did you uninstall wot, and reinstalled it again from the full version links i provided?

ARGO

Penetration

31.12.2010 19:10:04

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Penetration
Link on message: #330911

ARGO: Try HE rounds, they work well when AP aren't cutting it....

MrVic

World of invisible tanks

31.12.2010 19:01:32

Subject:

Archives\Junkyard\World of invisible tanks
Link on message: #330890

MrVic: Closed, Please use the main thread for this topic pinned in this section... http://forum.worldof...potting-thread/

ARGO

So how u think Amewican TD playstyle gonna be?

31.12.2010 17:54:23

Subject:

In-Game Vehicles\American Vehicles\Tank Destroyers\So how u think Amewican TD playstyle gonna be?
Link on message: #330738

Kameho, on 09 November 2010 - 05:42 AM, said: We see germans.
Slow lumbering, nasty hitting gun and immense frontal armor. basicly, the best defenders.
We see russians.
Medium speed, low profile, VERY nasty hitting gun, decent armor, althou not impressive. In other words, Best Ambushing tanks in the game, giving supportive fire, and shattering heavies from a distance.
One day we'll see americans.
Personally, i think americans gonna have quite different. considering most american TD has turrets.
I love hit N run tactics, basicly mobility, and the hellcat is a good example of a wwII american TD wich exactly was like this.
A light tank with a hard hitting gun.
Will they be the same?
High speed, hard but not nasty hitting gun, low armor. excellent flanking tank and to flank out heavies, hit and run away and take cover or move on to next target.
Hopefully, hellcat will be exactly how my "dreamtank" playstyle will be, as i play lights normally, and i rather sacrefice my scouting ability with a better gun instead.
wat u think?

ARGO: Kameho,
I must say you write some really nice and thought provking threads and this is one of them. Having read the title to it and your opening statement. Based on previous wipes/ Tree additions, Here is how I think the American TDs will do:
1. They will do very well
2. People who lose to them will complain
3. They will be labeled as OP
4. The people who complained will want them nerfed
5. If they do get nerfed the people who drive them will complain
6. Someone will get pawned miserably in a game by 3 T-44s or an IS4 and the attention will go back to them until they lose to arty.
Any way you cut it, In the end it's all going to depend on the "human" factor.....

ARGO

My British Tank Tree

31.12.2010 16:17:52

Subject:

Off-Topic Discussion\Historical Discussion\My British Tank Tree
Link on message: #330526

ARGO: What!!!!
No WW1 Mark V "male" tank?????
http://http://i1090....GO_66/MarkV.jpg
I mean no disrespect mind you your tree is great, but how could you leave history's 1st and most feared WW1 tank out of the fight? At least throw it in there as a "Premium". To leave out such a piece of British war history as the Mark V tank would be a travesty in itself.

merig00

Recognition of Extra Mouse Buttons

31.12.2010 15:48:17

Subject:

Archives\Beta\Recognition of Extra Mouse Buttons
Link on message: #330476

merig00: Yeah noticed that myself yesterday. Good idea!



	Автологин
Забыл пароль?

Developers posts on forum