Developers posts on forum

Subject: [Concurso] Guías de la Comunidad - La Sorpresa Alemana
Link on message: #11654964

Subject: [Servidor LATAM] Offline 20/05
Link on message: #11654818

Subject: WG why do you do you change crew skills going up the line?
Link on message: #11654450

NeroGermanicus, on May 19 2018 - 19:24, said: So I have been grinding the awful Italian lower tier tanks. I just get done with the P26/40 and move into the P43 and I get the surprise that one of the crew changes from a radio operator to a gunner. So now I have a crew that is way off with their secondary skills from the other 3. WHY WHY WHY? Do you all get some sick sensation of screwing with your player base or what?

Subject: Getting General in Frontline
Link on message: #11654446

Subject: Scale Model Group Build, anyone?
Link on message: #11653913

Subject: What is this.... broken game ...
Link on message: #11653666

OldFrog75, on May 19 2018 - 06:01, said: I thought HE was guaranteed to do at least some minimal damage (at least that's what some articles I read say) but I've also seen zero damage when fired.  

Subject: Stock Centurion Mk. 1 , spend the free exp?
Link on message: #11653650

Subject: Arms Race: Rules & Regulations
Link on message: #11653193

Subject: Pick of the Week #4
Link on message: #11653021

Subject: Pick of the Week #4
Link on message: #11653021

Subject: Pick of the Week #4
Link on message: #11653021

Subject: Frontline Guide Contest!
Link on message: #11653001

Subject: Frontline Guide Contest!
Link on message: #11653001

Subject: Frontline Guide Contest!
Link on message: #11653001

Subject: Wargamer won't let me recoup 500 gold - really?
Link on message: #11652931

Subject: I Implore You; Don't Buy Skin Tanks
Link on message: #11652912

Blackgunner, on May 17 2018 - 22:59, said:   ​Downfall was more for dramatic effect. The real phrase we're looking at is developmental stagnation.  When overall development or progress of the game is stalled out with no real content updates.  This doesn't mean the game is unsuccessful, just that it is no longer progressing.   People have mentioned League of Legends, Dota, Battlefield.  All of these are good examples of games that have a successful niche, but are in developmental stagnation.  When new, quality content is dropped in favor of cosmetics.  Many people will tell you each new Battlefield is really more of just a reskinned one.  A different time period, a different reality.  But under it all, it's still the same car.  Granted, we're talking about a singular series of games here.  Instances like tactical shooters, games like Siege which broke into a whole new thing, and is continuously adding new content even with (very minor) but still present customization options.   A game can be successful and still be stagnant.  Unfortunately, it's more of an exception than a rule.

Subject: Overcharged for Consumables
Link on message: #11652877

Subject: Overcharged for Consumables
Link on message: #11652877

Subject: Warhammer 40,000 Tanks Storm the Battlefield.- Dwight Schrute
Link on message: #11652853

_HerrSpray, on May 17 2018 - 22:20, said: The Mordian skin my BDR G1 B does not show up after I apply it, and I have "Hide Non-Historical Elements" unticked. I can see the KV-2 ®'s skin, but not the Mordian.

Subject: Warhammer 40,000 Tanks Storm the Battlefield.- Dwight Schrute
Link on message: #11652853

_HerrSpray, on May 17 2018 - 22:20, said: The Mordian skin my BDR G1 B does not show up after I apply it, and I have "Hide Non-Historical Elements" unticked. I can see the KV-2 ®'s skin, but not the Mordian.

Subject: Overcharged for Consumables
Link on message: #11652806

Subject: Overcharged for Consumables
Link on message: #11652806

Subject: Is the ISU-122S worth getting?
Link on message: #11652799

Scorpiany, on May 18 2018 - 02:14, said:     Misleading image you've posted. Your ISU-122S is using values with crew, while the SU-122-44 in the image is not. The aim time and accuracy for example, are identical. The image shows it being superior on the ISU-122S when that is not the case.   Use this comparison instead: https://tanks.gg/tank/isu-122s/stats?cs=su-122-44 T   Tanks.gg also shows you hidden statistics that are not shown in-game. Furthermore, you didn't touch on the impact of the armor differences nearly as much as you should have. The SU-122-44's armor is significantly better than the ISU-122S's armor. The ISU's armor is flat, and only has 100mm of effective penetration. The SU-122-44's armor on the other hand is angled very well, and as a result provides 150mm-170mm of effective protection. This means that while the ISU-122S will provide practically no protection against most targets that are not shooting HE shells, the SU-122-44 will be able to bounce most lower Tiered tanks very reliable, and if angling the armor, the SU-122-44 can create some auto-bounce angles while the ISU-122S simply cannot.   Lastly, the SU-122-44 is a lower profile vehicle. As a result, its camo values are substantially better than the ISU-122S. Your image however, because of the Camo Net you have mounted on the tank, makes it look as though the ISU's camo is better. The reality is quite different. The SU-122-44's camo values are as follow: 21.55/12.94/5.82. The ISU-122S's camo values are: 15.05/9.06/2.86. As you can see, the SU-122-44's camo values are significantly better all across the board.   Overall, the SU-122-44 becomes a much better assault tank and aggressive flanker because of the combination of mobility and armor. It's also easier to hide because of the camo values, which helps it ambush its opponents. This is especially true in a favorable matchup. The ISU-122S on the other hand is rather limited in this regard, and only really stands out in regards to its View Range / firepower. ISU-122S will definitely have the better gun performance, but it's on a sluggish, poorly armored platform.   This means that the SU-122-44 is the more competitive tank, and is a better option for all players. The benefits of the ISU-122S's gun and view range just don't make up for what it lacks in mobility, armor and camo rating. The SU-122-44 can lay out an ambush, it can flank and it can assault. The ISU-122S can't do any of those things.     While I understand you were only trying to help, you ultimately ended up posting false and misleading information. This is one of many reasons why players don't trust WarGaming employees - It often feels as though they don't understand the game when they make decisions. Unfortunately, this displays just that.   Because of a careless oversight when comparing the 2 tanks, using a comparison tool that doesn't display hidden statistics, as well as disregarding the impact certain characteristics have on gameplay, you ended up making a poor recommendation and made an inferior tank appear far better than it really is.

Subject: Is the ISU-122S worth getting?
Link on message: #11652799

Scorpiany, on May 18 2018 - 02:14, said:     Misleading image you've posted. Your ISU-122S is using values with crew, while the SU-122-44 in the image is not. The aim time and accuracy for example, are identical. The image shows it being superior on the ISU-122S when that is not the case.   Use this comparison instead: https://tanks.gg/tank/isu-122s/stats?cs=su-122-44 T   Tanks.gg also shows you hidden statistics that are not shown in-game. Furthermore, you didn't touch on the impact of the armor differences nearly as much as you should have. The SU-122-44's armor is significantly better than the ISU-122S's armor. The ISU's armor is flat, and only has 100mm of effective penetration. The SU-122-44's armor on the other hand is angled very well, and as a result provides 150mm-170mm of effective protection. This means that while the ISU-122S will provide practically no protection against most targets that are not shooting HE shells, the SU-122-44 will be able to bounce most lower Tiered tanks very reliable, and if angling the armor, the SU-122-44 can create some auto-bounce angles while the ISU-122S simply cannot.   Lastly, the SU-122-44 is a lower profile vehicle. As a result, its camo values are substantially better than the ISU-122S. Your image however, because of the Camo Net you have mounted on the tank, makes it look as though the ISU's camo is better. The reality is quite different. The SU-122-44's camo values are as follow: 21.55/12.94/5.82. The ISU-122S's camo values are: 15.05/9.06/2.86. As you can see, the SU-122-44's camo values are significantly better all across the board.   Overall, the SU-122-44 becomes a much better assault tank and aggressive flanker because of the combination of mobility and armor. It's also easier to hide because of the camo values, which helps it ambush its opponents. This is especially true in a favorable matchup. The ISU-122S on the other hand is rather limited in this regard, and only really stands out in regards to its View Range / firepower. ISU-122S will definitely have the better gun performance, but it's on a sluggish, poorly armored platform.   This means that the SU-122-44 is the more competitive tank, and is a better option for all players. The benefits of the ISU-122S's gun and view range just don't make up for what it lacks in mobility, armor and camo rating. The SU-122-44 can lay out an ambush, it can flank and it can assault. The ISU-122S can't do any of those things.     While I understand you were only trying to help, you ultimately ended up posting false and misleading information. This is one of many reasons why players don't trust WarGaming employees - It often feels as though they don't understand the game when they make decisions. Unfortunately, this displays just that.   Because of a careless oversight when comparing the 2 tanks, using a comparison tool that doesn't display hidden statistics, as well as disregarding the impact certain characteristics have on gameplay, you ended up making a poor recommendation and made an inferior tank appear far better than it really is.

Subject: Is the ISU-122S worth getting?
Link on message: #11652799

Scorpiany, on May 18 2018 - 02:14, said:     Misleading image you've posted. Your ISU-122S is using values with crew, while the SU-122-44 in the image is not. The aim time and accuracy for example, are identical. The image shows it being superior on the ISU-122S when that is not the case.   Use this comparison instead: https://tanks.gg/tank/isu-122s/stats?cs=su-122-44 T   Tanks.gg also shows you hidden statistics that are not shown in-game. Furthermore, you didn't touch on the impact of the armor differences nearly as much as you should have. The SU-122-44's armor is significantly better than the ISU-122S's armor. The ISU's armor is flat, and only has 100mm of effective penetration. The SU-122-44's armor on the other hand is angled very well, and as a result provides 150mm-170mm of effective protection. This means that while the ISU-122S will provide practically no protection against most targets that are not shooting HE shells, the SU-122-44 will be able to bounce most lower Tiered tanks very reliable, and if angling the armor, the SU-122-44 can create some auto-bounce angles while the ISU-122S simply cannot.   Lastly, the SU-122-44 is a lower profile vehicle. As a result, its camo values are substantially better than the ISU-122S. Your image however, because of the Camo Net you have mounted on the tank, makes it look as though the ISU's camo is better. The reality is quite different. The SU-122-44's camo values are as follow: 21.55/12.94/5.82. The ISU-122S's camo values are: 15.05/9.06/2.86. As you can see, the SU-122-44's camo values are significantly better all across the board.   Overall, the SU-122-44 becomes a much better assault tank and aggressive flanker because of the combination of mobility and armor. It's also easier to hide because of the camo values, which helps it ambush its opponents. This is especially true in a favorable matchup. The ISU-122S on the other hand is rather limited in this regard, and only really stands out in regards to its View Range / firepower. ISU-122S will definitely have the better gun performance, but it's on a sluggish, poorly armored platform.   This means that the SU-122-44 is the more competitive tank, and is a better option for all players. The benefits of the ISU-122S's gun and view range just don't make up for what it lacks in mobility, armor and camo rating. The SU-122-44 can lay out an ambush, it can flank and it can assault. The ISU-122S can't do any of those things.     While I understand you were only trying to help, you ultimately ended up posting false and misleading information. This is one of many reasons why players don't trust WarGaming employees - It often feels as though they don't understand the game when they make decisions. Unfortunately, this displays just that.   Because of a careless oversight when comparing the 2 tanks, using a comparison tool that doesn't display hidden statistics, as well as disregarding the impact certain characteristics have on gameplay, you ended up making a poor recommendation and made an inferior tank appear far better than it really is.

Subject: Voltando ao jogo!
Link on message: #11652737

xxvitoor, on May 18 2018 - 11:35, said:   Confere, pelo menos a parte de abrir as 11:00 e fechar as 02:00 confere, de fim de semana não sei


V_A_C_A, on May 18 2018 - 09:26, said:   Pelo que me consta (e a informação pode estar desatualizada), os horários do LATAM são das 11h da manhã até às 2h da noite/madrugada (parece que nos finais de semana o horário de fechamento estende-se até às 6h da manhã_).
Vou ver se acho a informação oficial atualizada.

Era essa a informação oficial a que me referi:
http://forum.worldof...7#entry11357347
 

Subject: Is the ISU-122S worth getting?
Link on message: #11651825

Subject: Is the ISU-122S worth getting?
Link on message: #11651825

Subject: Is the ISU-122S worth getting?
Link on message: #11651825

Subject: Warhammer 40k Tanks
Link on message: #11651681

Awestryker, on May 17 2018 - 10:58, said:   Does the KV-2® skin and the BDR skin count as camo, or is the lack of camo change in game interface just a typo to be fixed?    

Subject: [Concurso] Guías de la Comunidad - Clásicos Soviéticos
Link on message: #11651669

vergara21, on May 13 2018 - 18:16, said:   jajjaajaaj esta vez no escribo nada. veremos la proxima  


vergara21, on May 16 2018 - 20:10, said: dejo mi guia : http://forum.worldof...ервый-мститель/

Subject: ATTENTION: Downtime on May 18!
Link on message: #11651662

Subject: The T32 FL just appeared in my garage... Why?
Link on message: #11651640

Cyberman480, on May 17 2018 - 10:29, said: I just received a T32 FL in my garage. Why? Is this a free tank I can use forever and for anything? Why would war gaming give me a free tank? Is there some kind of event going on? I am confused.


Block Quote To make the event and its rewards available to as many players as possible, we are introducing two special vehicles that will allow all players to participate in the mode, regardless of whether they have a Tier VIII vehicle or not. The special vehicles are the T-44, Tier VIII U.S.S.R. medium tank and the T32, Tier VIII U.S.A. heavy tank.   When the event is over, the vehicles will be removed from players' accounts. All property (shells, consumables, and equipment) will be transferred to the Depot. Experience earned on the rental vehicles will be transferred to the T1 and MS-1 tanks. The crew will be transferred to the Barracks.

Subject: Warhammer 40k Tanks
Link on message: #11651567

Subject: Warhammer 40,000 Tanks Storm the Battlefield.- Dwight Schrute
Link on message: #11651528

seekerjuanchis, on May 16 2018 - 21:54, said: Your prices are excellent WGM!(Got a Forum Warning... dont not say WGM is greedy with prices, they get mad! )


__Neo__, on May 17 2018 - 05:45, said: Can we get a confirmation from WG if the skin is bugged?  It is showing no camo benefit, so to actually get a camo benefit I would have to yank off the skin and go bare+add camo skin to it? 
I can't imagine it's their intention to release a skinned premium version of a tank that gets 0 benefit from it's skinned status.  Like the Defender, the SkorpionG, etc that come with bought camo, THEY offer camo value.  But this one doesn't?  I love the KV2 but not sure on the price, it is a little steep, and if the skin is not going to give any camo benefit whatsoever it might just be the tipping point.  So, is this going to be corrected?   The Premium Skin I buy with the tank SHOULD offer me the normal camo benefit.

Subject: Bring back tournaments! Please
Link on message: #11651509

Subject: Bring back tournaments! Please
Link on message: #11651509

Subject: Bring back tournaments! Please
Link on message: #11651509

Subject: [Superteste] Novo Mapa: Berlin - Parte 2
Link on message: #11651409

Subject: Cromwell B and ISU-122S Solo bundles are finally here!
Link on message: #11651397