Developers posts on forum

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Suggestions\"Rape" Y/N
Link on message: #1042701

Sturmtiger_304, on Oct 22 2011 - 19:04, said: Oh, and I do not use the word filter since it filters out words that doesn't really mean any sense, like light provokative words and so on.

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Map Preview: Mexico
Link on message: #1041900

Chares, on Oct 26 2011 - 21:39, said: Dammit, again with common grammatical and location errors. Mexico is CENTRAL America, South America starts on Colombia. same thing, diferent stry like saying "american" tanks.
Still, nicely looking map.

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Please welcome Nyx, the newest member of the Wargaming America Community team!
Link on message: #1040668

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Map Preview: Mexico
Link on message: #1039980

Subject: Map Preview: Mexico
Link on message: #1039980

Subject: Map Preview: Mexico
Link on message: #1039980

Subject: Map Preview: Mexico
Link on message: #1039980

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Clan member banned.
Link on message: #1039780

tumbitiger, on Oct 26 2011 - 06:01, said: This is the NA server isn't it? so why the hell does WG go round banning members when this server should not have anything to do with the stupid EU laws about Natzism? Good move WG


USMarine, on Oct 26 2011 - 06:06, said: No doubt.
"Bans are not to be disputed on the forums. Please file a ticket at support@worldoftanks.com" blah blah blah.
Especially with, SoulSpectre reading it....


Luffwaffle, on Oct 26 2011 - 06:07, said: Then make more threads. This is issue must be brought to attention for the sake of all those affected by this unfair and horrid approach. I will not support a company that just sells out it's supporters like this and I am refusing to play WoT till this issue is fixed.
Think if this happened to you. How would you feel? I'm dang sure you would want someone to protest for you. So let's protest. No one here can say this is a fair decision.


Chairman_Maus, on Oct 26 2011 - 06:16, said: WG had a medal for christ sake named after him. They changed the name let this guy change his.


Comrade_Ryanovski, on Oct 26 2011 - 06:20, said: Giving a warning for this is not in WOT playbook, lets be honest most people would obliviously think of "Hitler",Himmer", Gobbels ect as violating the EU rules but not Michal Whitman!
But the right thing to do on WOT's part would be to give a warning and an opportunity to change the name since no doubt he had this name through 1000's of games and among others who also
have variations on this name. But outright banning is so much easier rather then doing the right thing I suppose.
But the Irony of course is that we play German tanks which the Nazi's used to over run other nations, and of course Russian tanks named after Stalin!


Sealteam6, on Oct 26 2011 - 06:06, said: Then this is his escape from jail card.
We're all agreed the name falls under WoTs rules as the SS are outlawed in certain parts of Europe so expect all the M Wittmans to receive the same mail.
This just WoTs way of getting his attention.
A rationally written trouble ticket with the evidence above attached should see him fine but don't expect replies straight away, it goes through the Minsk Offices for these sorts of bans & takes a week to 10 days for a reply.
Don't ask North American Mods to help, they cant, its you & head office in Belarus now.

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\World of Tanks at GDC Online 2011
Link on message: #1037756

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Gamespot Reviews World of Tanks
Link on message: #1037676

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1036888

 Troika, on Oct 22 2011 - 03:59, said: Hey, guys, no point in browbeating Overlord over percieved imbalances. He's just a PR guy, so he doesn't write code or anything. He's also pretty nice compared to the devs on the Russian forum, so don't be too mean to him
Will the French tanks that can't use their secondary main guns recieve any temporary buffs until those guns are useable?

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1036885

 skullval, on Oct 22 2011 - 07:42, said: are they working on anything to fix the bounce shots way to many and i shot a is-7 from my e-100 in the rear end and it bounce how can that be i shot a t50-2 from my lowe on the side and it bounce if in WWII this many bounce shots we still be fighting it i dont play any more because of this problem i come in get my doubles for the day and i leave its no fun shooting someone and they it bounce and they turn and kill you with a way lower tank and they need to fix how many arty in a match i seen 8 on each side what up with that need to limit it to 3 or 4 max ty you and please answer

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1036884

 Abu_Kasap, on Oct 22 2011 - 11:05, said: Will be any fix about critical hits?
Examples:
1. Obj.704 shoot on light tank- no damage just tracked. Same happens with T95.
2.AP shot hits me-2 critical hits /2 tracks at once, track and turret, track and ammo rack, etc./
3. Front hull AP shot-tank on fire/engine damage/fuel damage/gun damage.

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1036878

 theChosen, on Oct 22 2011 - 16:44, said: Well, no Devs have answered this question. But meanwhile, I have one related to it because of the player answers I got:
Do trees give any camo bonus AT ALL if they are client-side only??

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1036872

 Blizzard36, on Oct 23 2011 - 05:46, said: What is the progress on the plan to have tanks that purposely exit the battle to avoid being "Killed" and so deny the credits and XP for killing them to the enemy team stuck in the battle for a bit longer? I beleive it was previously stated the intent in the end was to keep such tanks in the battle for a couple minutes longer before they burn up to allow enemies the chance to still get the kill.
All I know is it was highly aggrivating to work my ass off in my stock T20 earlier today to outmaneuver a tier 9 TD,track him, and then get locked on his rear. (And even then I was bouncing off his rear armor 4/5 shots.) I worked hard to get those shots and the reward that comes with managint to deal damage to such a larger tank, and he just pulled his plug.

Subject: Hey ex/current MLP players looking for home.
Link on message: #1036484

NERDS_R_COOL, on Oct 25 2011 - 02:15, said: Ankha83, on Oct 24 2011 - 17:43, said: Save for the MLP trolls making fun of you (about 40), everyone else was kicked out.
You will not see any of the cheated MLP members posting here. They do not wish to have anything to do with drama.
Voth, Patreal2000, Hypnotic, Xpedience, Crayon_eater, Joseywales, Itrosnoc, Tzimon etc are some of the individuals who planned or supported this textbook take over. It is the very same people thanks to whom you hate MLP so much. You can keep your contempt for them since they have no intention to change their ways. Their new clan will be called WAR.
The people who were shafted have no reason to be concerned about their reputation. The very fact they were kicked out is evidence enough they have nothing in common with these trolls and cheats.
Deathtouch was not consulted on this because he would have never agreed to such a thing. Essentially the clan was taken away from him.
I woke up this morning to check how CW went last night to find I had no clan. I have previously stayed away from the forums due to obscenely high level of stupidity involved in people trolling each other (both from MLP and non) over a tank game. Now, I am searching for why I have no clan. This is the first post I have come across with even a hint of it. Guess, I need to spend a bit more time on the forums in the future. Ohhhhhh sweet irony.
I for one feel this was very underhanded. It makes me wonder where that 200k gold really went? And by whom was it really moved?
At this point if I did join another clan it would not be one allied with whom ever MLP has now become. I obviously made a very poor decision in trying to join MLP in the first place.
Edit: I realize that this post points the finger at all MLP. However, there were many MLP members that were good people and I enjoyed playing with them. Its a shame that I will probably not get to play with some of them again.


Ankha83, on Oct 24 2011 - 17:43, said: Save for the MLP trolls making fun of you (about 40), everyone else was kicked out.
You will not see any of the cheated MLP members posting here. They do not wish to have anything to do with drama.
Voth, Patreal2000, Hypnotic, Xpedience, Crayon_eater, Joseywales, Itrosnoc, Tzimon etc are some of the individuals who planned or supported this textbook take over. It is the very same people thanks to whom you hate MLP so much. You can keep your contempt for them since they have no intention to change their ways. Their new clan will be called WAR.
The people who were shafted have no reason to be concerned about their reputation. The very fact they were kicked out is evidence enough they have nothing in common with these trolls and cheats.
Deathtouch was not consulted on this because he would have never agreed to such a thing. Essentially the clan was taken away from him.

Subject: Hey ex/current MLP players looking for home.
Link on message: #1034892

G1bby, on Oct 24 2011 - 18:39, said: So DeathTouch is saying this happened without his knowledge and someone said all members were paid out a equal share out of the clan's vault?
Did all ex-MLP members receive their fair share?  Or was this just a bloodless coup and only a few select members received gold?

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\The Chieftain's Hatch\El Alamein
Link on message: #1031974

FryaDuck, on Oct 23 2011 - 10:08, said: The Chicken - WarGammings military specialist who won't touch anything he may get pulled up on.

Subject: Off-Topic Discussion\Junkyard\*Removed* admin? or just a little peon in mlp
Link on message: #1030778

Tuco22, on Oct 23 2011 - 04:25, said: Danylu is a mod, and he has been for quite some time...

Subject: Off-Topic Discussion\Off-Topic\Courtesy to your fellow players
Link on message: #1030622

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1030115

Bigfeats, on Oct 23 2011 - 02:03, said: VK3002 DB
Victory!
Battle: Arctic Region Saturday, October 22, 2011 7:50:00 PM
Vehicle: VK 3002 (DB)
Experience received: 323
Credits received: 16,002
Does that seemed doubled?

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1029856

SKULL2XL, on Oct 22 2011 - 22:24, said: I GOT 58,000 in 1 battle with my grill today not bad for a teir 4

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\World of Tanks Player Appreciation Day
Link on message: #1028118

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1028111

gunnerG, on Oct 22 2011 - 02:14, said: Did we ever get confirmation on whether we get double xp for all crews vs. only crews on the special's tanks?

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1026982

gunnerG, on Oct 21 2011 - 22:08, said: So does the "double experience for crew training" mean that the crew trains twice as fast? Also, is this for all crews or only for crews of the vehicles listed in the special? Thanks.

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1026924

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\World of Tanks Player Appreciation Day
Link on message: #1026918

TazzMaRazz, on Oct 21 2011 - 21:47, said: Thank you very much for the appreciation. Where did you actually place in the balloting?

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\World of Tanks Player Appreciation Day
Link on message: #1026319

Subject: World of Tanks Player Appreciation Day
Link on message: #1026319

Subject: World of Tanks Player Appreciation Day
Link on message: #1026319

Subject: World of Tanks Player Appreciation Day
Link on message: #1026319

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1024700

Toxicx187x, on Oct 20 2011 - 23:36, said: US servers got the worse deal for this event. At least give us the Pz4 for double credits.

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Map Preview: Kansas
Link on message: #1024407

David_90539, on Oct 20 2011 - 20:49, said: Could i get a link to that south Africa map preview?

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\Map Preview: Kansas
Link on message: #1024357

evhgear, on Oct 20 2011 - 21:12, said: They should make more maps in WWII than fictionnal ones IMO

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1023835

Buhallin, on Oct 20 2011 - 19:30, said: Last comment here, then I'm done with this.
If you don't care about the history, that's fine. Some do. Everyone has different things they'd like to see in the game, that's to be expected.
But I'm baffled by the pointless attacks on anyone who would prefer something more historical. Why am I "a joke" just because I think the history is important? Why can't people who like the history side express their desire for that, just like anyone else? How is it somehow a sense of entitlement to express what we want? There's ten pages here, mostly full of people asking for this bonus or that reward that they personally need, but somehow the people asking for more historically connected events are showing a selfish sense of entitlement and should just be happy with what we're given? Even when most of what we're asking for has nothing to do with what would benefit us personally?
A big part of the disconnect here, IMHO, is that WG set a standard. Most of the events have been based on rewarding people for playing the tanks that were actually there. It was a nice nod to history in a game which (as has been pointed out repeatedly) generally doesn't respect history much in any other aspect. They're moving away from that, and some of us feel that's a loss. There's really no part of that which deserves the assault it's gotten.

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1023819

nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: Should be the following tanks; Some tanks are listed because they were there in type but not present configuration. Russian Matilda for instance is over gunned for the battle and the valentine is under gunned for the same battle. American tanks are listed with there British names. German PZ4 is mentioned because the short 75 armed E models where fielded throughout the desert campaign.


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: American; [Lend Lease]
M3 Stuart [honey]


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: M3 Lee [grant]
M7 Priest [90 were in service, some having been used at this battle. Latter modified to carry the 25 pdr and renamed the Sexton]


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: M4 Sherman [300 of these "swallows" tanks served]


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: German;
Panzer 3 [H - J Models]


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: Panzer 2


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: Panzer 4 [E Models]


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: Marder 2 [Sub for the Marder 3 which was there]
Bison


nicodeimous, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:10, said: Russian; [In lieu of the British]
Valentine [Valentine III]
Matilda [Matilda 2pdr version was there]

Subject: World of Tanks News and Information\News and Information\El Alamein Special! Updated!
Link on message: #1023788

MullAY, on Oct 20 2011 - 18:37, said: First post here ><, long story short though i was trying to skim forums to find the last time bonuses were offered for the 02DB and had issues with 404's n such do to the recent website updates. Does anyone remember the last time 50% off price was offered for this tank? I noticed double credits are being applied this weekend for the 02DB for El Alamein special(WTF?). However, being relatively new to game and more or less have credits to just buy tank without slapping on any extra modules, I was just curious if it's plausible that they would apply 50% off to purchase price this weekend. IMO as a perk incentive I think the historical accuracy QQ within this thread could be smothered by not offering double credits for some of the aforementioned tanks as 50% off may be a better solution, but that's just my opinion.

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1022795

CaddoPuma, on Oct 18 2011 - 23:59, said: Regarding the free xp gain during specials: I know that normally free xp is 5% of tank xp. In daily doubles, is free xp 5% base (before double) or 5% doubled xp? In specials where the daily double is increased to daily quintuple, is free xp 5% base or 5%(base*5)?

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1022794

Hirumaru, on Oct 18 2011 - 22:38, said: Developer secrecy leads to community doubt.
Overlord, has it at all been considered that the prime reason why there are so many complainers, whiner, and Russian bias callers is due to how much information the development team does withhold? I mean, the only reason why we found out how blatantly biased the Russian camo advantage was, was due to someone decrypting an important file. Without that we would have never known how full of crap the camo system really was, and possibly still is. We have no idea how to know that your "readjustment" of the camo values doesn't still put anything non-Russian at a disadvantage. We only have your word that everything is now based on "volume", yet we can't actually trust your word since we have such abundant truth that you have deceived us so unrighteously in the past.
Do you have any comments on why so many statistics are being withheld from the community? Preferably something that doesn't rely on the "security, hackers, exploiters, herp derp" shtick every developer out there likes to default on.
Love and huggles,
-Hiru

Subject: World of Tanks Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Player Questions & Developer Answers
Link on message: #1022791

yiffy, on Oct 18 2011 - 21:25, said: Thanks!
But, why Chinese (other than aiming for the huge Chinese player market)? Any info on "Captured Panther", "Demolisher Tank", "Sherman with 90", "T34 with LB1"?
The PT-76 and PT-85 may also make excellent potential premium vehicles. Hey, I am giving you ideas on making more money out of premium vehicles