Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
stabbymckill
Incoming! Field Modification Open Test!
14.06.2021 18:10:40
Subject: Incoming! Field Modification Open Test!
Link on message: #12850951
Link on message: #12850951
stabbymckill: Good Morning Tankers,
on June 15 the open test of Field Modification begins on the Sandbox server. This allows you to configure vehicles depending on their combat roles. Player feedback is urgently needed in order to better refine the concept for potential future inclusion in the game.
TONS of details on this one, so head over to the article here for all the fine print and information on how to participate!
on June 15 the open test of Field Modification begins on the Sandbox server. This allows you to configure vehicles depending on their combat roles. Player feedback is urgently needed in order to better refine the concept for potential future inclusion in the game.
TONS of details on this one, so head over to the article here for all the fine print and information on how to participate!
Draschel
Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
14.06.2021 06:35:53
Subject: Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
Link on message: #12850834
RickEdwards, on Jun 14 2021 - 03:24, said: Currently more mobile heavies/ heavies with higher dpm are strongly
preferred despite lack of armor over slower tanks with more armor.
The reason for this is that gold ammo makes that increased armor
obtained from trading away mobility/firepower mostly useless. With
the removal/nerf of gold at high tier, tanks with heavier armor
would be as competitive overall when compared to those more mobile
heavies, and in fact more competitive in certain scenarios, as
opposed to basically being as effective or less effective,
depending on the situation, as they are now. Of course, I
would say that those few tanks that have been added/buffed
specifically to be balanced in relation to gold ammo (Type 5,
Maus, Chieftain, 279E) would need to be nerfed/reverted to their
previous stats. But these tanks are so few that any argument with
them as a basis is pretty silly.
Link on message: #12850834
RickEdwards, on Jun 14 2021 - 03:24, said: Currently more mobile heavies/ heavies with higher dpm are strongly
preferred despite lack of armor over slower tanks with more armor.
The reason for this is that gold ammo makes that increased armor
obtained from trading away mobility/firepower mostly useless. With
the removal/nerf of gold at high tier, tanks with heavier armor
would be as competitive overall when compared to those more mobile
heavies, and in fact more competitive in certain scenarios, as
opposed to basically being as effective or less effective,
depending on the situation, as they are now. Of course, I
would say that those few tanks that have been added/buffed
specifically to be balanced in relation to gold ammo (Type 5,
Maus, Chieftain, 279E) would need to be nerfed/reverted to their
previous stats. But these tanks are so few that any argument with
them as a basis is pretty silly.Draschel: Currently, mobile successful heavy tanks like Chieftain,
Renegade, object 260-277 are where they are right now, not because
of DPM. In fact, tanks like Kranvan, T57, 110E5, Super conqueror,
113 are out of favor despite no shortage of DPM, having
already considerably higher DPM than the first tanks listed. It is
because the first listed, they are very flexible, able to do many
things slow heavy tanks cannot do. Super conqueror is good, but
what is better? A fast super conqueror, with less weaknesses. Even
279E and IS7, despite the armor profile, isn't slow like IS4
or 60TP. Flexibility, above average qualities across the board, are
key. It is not for the reason of DPM. Of course removing gold
ammunition penetration favors extremely heavy tanks, but that won't
increase their flex and the ability to influence maps the way fast
heavy tanks do. Pardon me, but I am not sure you
understand how this goes.
Draschel
Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
14.06.2021 05:00:15
Subject: Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
Link on message: #12850796
RickEdwards, on Jun 14 2021 - 02:30, said: Capped as in the highest pen gold ammo of any tier is the
tier 10 standard of that line. I said that tanks under tier 8 would
basically remain unchanged... Very few of these tanks
you listed are actually hard to penetrate with normal ammo, and the
ones that are (Type 5, Maus, 279E, Chieftain) are ones that were
made/buffed after the gold ammo spam meta was firmly in place. They
are the direct effect of people spamming gold; WG won't release a
reward tank or buff a super heavy only to make it useless, so they
were forced to make them OP to have a chance to withstand gold ammo
because gold ammo is itself OP. "Nerf premium rounds" =
"make my armor not useless"
Link on message: #12850796
RickEdwards, on Jun 14 2021 - 02:30, said: Capped as in the highest pen gold ammo of any tier is the
tier 10 standard of that line. I said that tanks under tier 8 would
basically remain unchanged... Very few of these tanks
you listed are actually hard to penetrate with normal ammo, and the
ones that are (Type 5, Maus, 279E, Chieftain) are ones that were
made/buffed after the gold ammo spam meta was firmly in place. They
are the direct effect of people spamming gold; WG won't release a
reward tank or buff a super heavy only to make it useless, so they
were forced to make them OP to have a chance to withstand gold ammo
because gold ammo is itself OP. "Nerf premium rounds" =
"make my armor not useless"Draschel: Its not the tanks being hard to penetrate in laboratory,
flattened 50m conditions without obstruction. It is them being hard
to penetrate in most battlefield conditions you find them in. If
you cannot understand this, then you are lost. Tanks like Suka
Pershing, Tiger II, AC mle 48 can easily bounce standard 225-227mm
AP penetration in tier 8. But with the provided weak spots, if you
take the time aiming, you can even penetrate them with 175mm AP.
This is how armor started in the game, and this is how it should
be. Not armor models like Type 5 or Chrysler or 112, where
weakspots are non existent, or are too damn small for any sort of
practical distance and viability. If you think
armor is useless, to this day, you definitely are lost. Armor isn't
useless. Great players, tell themselves and live by, armor cannot
be depended on. Surely. But they know for certain it isn't
useless.
Einzelganger7
Match Day 2021: Predict Soccer Results and Get Rewards!
14.06.2021 04:17:02
Subject: Match Day 2021: Predict Soccer Results and Get Rewards!
Link on message: #12850780
Link on message: #12850780
Einzelganger7: Well I have 6/7 correct, they have been too predictable except for
Wales vs Switzerland, it took me by surprise that goal during the
last part of the match and ended in a draw...
Draschel
Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
14.06.2021 02:47:09
Subject: Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
Link on message: #12850753
Kharah_reppinNLD, on Jun 13 2021 - 19:59, said: The Chieftain and 279 would like to have a word with you.
And e3 and many other tanks.
Minneer_BigSadge, on Jun 13 2021 - 21:30, said:
Link on message: #12850753
Kharah_reppinNLD, on Jun 13 2021 - 19:59, said: The Chieftain and 279 would like to have a word with you.
And e3 and many other tanks.Draschel: 430U, IS7, Badger, object 263, Type 5, Maus, new E100, E75,
VK4502 (P) B, Tortoise, Concept, Chieftain, new IS4, new STI, 705A,
279EThe new changes to meds entering heavy threshold like 121,
121B, object 140, releases like 122 TM, 274A not convincing for the
nerf premium ammo argument either.
Minneer_BigSadge, on Jun 13 2021 - 21:30, said: Draschel:
Draschel
Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
14.06.2021 02:37:34
Subject: Cap Gold Ammo Penetration Value
Link on message: #12850745
RickEdwards, on Jun 13 2021 - 18:30, said: So generally the biggest argument against a nerf of gold ammo is
that lower tiers need it to have a chance against higher tiers.
This is a fair argument, as a tier 6 against a tier 8 heavy
generally has little chance to pen without gold ammo. The
main problem with gold ammo, however, is at higher tiers, where
there are no tanks in the game that are 2 tiers (or even 1 tier)
higher. A tier 10 tanks does not need a special ammo with
higher penetration to penetrate tanks of the same tier; all having
such an ammo does is make armor literally impossible to
balance, as it either becomes impossible to pen
with normal ammo or the effectiveness of paper vs gold ammo.
I propose that the gold ammo of everything below tier ten
have its penetration capped at the normal ammo penetration of the
tier 10 of its respective line. What this will do is generally keep
everything tier 8 and down basically the same (with a few
exceptions like the Obj. 416's 320 mm pen gun), while nerfing or
removing the gold ammo of tier 9 and 10. Tier 8s and 9s will then
be able to use gold ammo to have the same penetration values as
tier 10s. This simple change would go extremely far to balance high
tier gameplay, which is essentially being dumbed down by rampant
gold spam.
Link on message: #12850745
RickEdwards, on Jun 13 2021 - 18:30, said: So generally the biggest argument against a nerf of gold ammo is
that lower tiers need it to have a chance against higher tiers.
This is a fair argument, as a tier 6 against a tier 8 heavy
generally has little chance to pen without gold ammo. The
main problem with gold ammo, however, is at higher tiers, where
there are no tanks in the game that are 2 tiers (or even 1 tier)
higher. A tier 10 tanks does not need a special ammo with
higher penetration to penetrate tanks of the same tier; all having
such an ammo does is make armor literally impossible to
balance, as it either becomes impossible to pen
with normal ammo or the effectiveness of paper vs gold ammo.
I propose that the gold ammo of everything below tier ten
have its penetration capped at the normal ammo penetration of the
tier 10 of its respective line. What this will do is generally keep
everything tier 8 and down basically the same (with a few
exceptions like the Obj. 416's 320 mm pen gun), while nerfing or
removing the gold ammo of tier 9 and 10. Tier 8s and 9s will then
be able to use gold ammo to have the same penetration values as
tier 10s. This simple change would go extremely far to balance high
tier gameplay, which is essentially being dumbed down by rampant
gold spam.Draschel: False. An extremely large component of the argument
against gold ammunition, are tanks with total lack or minute weak
spots, that in some instances are practically immune to same tier
AP. Minus the RNG dice roll, assuming average is thrown at it. This
is an extremely fair, legitimate argument, as tanks shouldn't be
totally combat resistant to standardized averaged AP levels on a
tier by tier basis. A tank needs higher penetration ammo
in high tiers, because this is especially the region at
which tanks without weak spots, or over-the-years
up-armoring takes place. I am not against gold ammunition
damage reductions, and making AP the more damaging round. But this
needs to be done immediately and in conjunction with heavily
armored tank armor model nerfs, and proper weak spot
implementation. Not one after the other,
simultaneously. I propose that if any gold ammunition
changes are to occur, proper tier by tier balancing of heavily
armored tanks and weak spot implementation follow suit, at the same
time. These changes, to all gold shells / armor models / credible
weak spots -> will go extremely far in making the game fair,
rather than just hating on premium ammunition itself.
_BobaFett
cant login
14.06.2021 02:06:09
Draschel
Kp 07 RH verses M41 90
14.06.2021 00:51:22
Subject: Kp 07 RH verses M41 90
Link on message: #12850688
bake3020, on Jun 13 2021 - 21:01, said: Armor is pretty much a moot point on any vehicle, in this game,
nowadays.
Link on message: #12850688
bake3020, on Jun 13 2021 - 21:01, said: Armor is pretty much a moot point on any vehicle, in this game,
nowadays.Draschel: Completely false. Non-helpful gibberish, as usual.
Adam_Antium
Una presentación para toda la comunidad
13.06.2021 20:34:04
Subject: Una presentación para toda la comunidad
Link on message: #12850603
lospescas, on Jun 13 2021 - 06:55, said: Adam... ¿que opinas de esta iniciativa de nuestro gran amigo
maqq? 
. Aprovecho ya que veo que nos estas
observando 
.
Link on message: #12850603
lospescas, on Jun 13 2021 - 06:55, said: Adam... ¿que opinas de esta iniciativa de nuestro gran amigo
maqq? . Aprovecho ya que veo que nos estas
observando .Adam_Antium: Mi estimado, es domingo. Los trabajadores toman descansos los
domingos 
Dicho eso, ya hay una zona para
guías y sugerencias que es básicamente vuestra
para que utilicen ya que en algunas secciones tenemos ausencia de
posteos desde 2020. Puede que lo considere pero por ahora prefiero
mantener las estructuras antiguas hasta nuevo aviso. Lo que sí les
podría proveer sería un canal en nuestro Discord oficial para que
publiquen contenido escrito y linkear directo a esos topics.
Dicho eso, ya hay una zona para
guías y sugerencias que es básicamente vuestra
para que utilicen ya que en algunas secciones tenemos ausencia de
posteos desde 2020. Puede que lo considere pero por ahora prefiero
mantener las estructuras antiguas hasta nuevo aviso. Lo que sí les
podría proveer sería un canal en nuestro Discord oficial para que
publiquen contenido escrito y linkear directo a esos topics.Adam_Antina
Una presentación para toda la comunidad
13.06.2021 20:34:04
Subject: Una presentación para toda la comunidad
Link on message: #12850603
lospescas, on Jun 13 2021 - 06:55, said: Adam... ¿que opinas de esta iniciativa de nuestro gran amigo
maqq? . Aprovecho ya que veo que nos estas
observando .
Link on message: #12850603
lospescas, on Jun 13 2021 - 06:55, said: Adam... ¿que opinas de esta iniciativa de nuestro gran amigo
maqq? . Aprovecho ya que veo que nos estas
observando .Adam_Antina: Mi estimado, es domingo. Los trabajadores toman descansos los
domingos Dicho eso, ya hay una zona para
guías y sugerencias que es básicamente vuestra
para que utilicen ya que en algunas secciones tenemos ausencia de
posteos desde 2020. Puede que lo considere pero por ahora prefiero
mantener las estructuras antiguas hasta nuevo aviso. Lo que sí les
podría proveer sería un canal en nuestro Discord oficial para que
publiquen contenido escrito y linkear directo a esos topics.
Dicho eso, ya hay una zona para
guías y sugerencias que es básicamente vuestra
para que utilicen ya que en algunas secciones tenemos ausencia de
posteos desde 2020. Puede que lo considere pero por ahora prefiero
mantener las estructuras antiguas hasta nuevo aviso. Lo que sí les
podría proveer sería un canal en nuestro Discord oficial para que
publiquen contenido escrito y linkear directo a esos topics._BobaFett
VK 28.01 Scout ACE
13.06.2021 17:28:22
_BobaFett
Losing Data
13.06.2021 17:22:31
Draschel
Whaaaa?
13.06.2021 14:44:47
Subject: Whaaaa?
Link on message: #12850476
Link on message: #12850476
Draschel: There is another one, but it is certainly not well known. French
105mm on ARLV, ARL44, M4 45 are the most common, and don't suffer
any drawbacks like SU100Y and ISU130 pen loss.However, there is
also the real idiotic, old as heck T40 tank destroyer. It has an
idiot low velocity middle gun, 3in AT, that can fire higher
penetration, higher damage HEAT ammo.The arty curiously, AMX 105 47
and 50, the tech tree 4-5, also used to be able to fire the same
ARL44 and ARLV APCR shells. But they were removed in SPG
rebalance 9.17
Draschel
Kp 07 RH verses M41 90
13.06.2021 12:22:31
Subject: Kp 07 RH verses M41 90
Link on message: #12850459
Link on message: #12850459
Draschel: They are different tanks. RH07 may have less HE pen, but the
shell travels considerably quicker with more accuracy. The tank
hull also carries much more ammo, M41 90 needs to carry enough HEAT
and AP. It also is way better attacking, because it has some armor
and M41 doesn't, HP, and more gun depression M41 90 on the
other hand retains camo while moving, has better view range, and is
considerably faster. It may appear RH07 is more mobile, but not
with its bad soft cross country stats. RH07 I see, compares
similarly and favorably to STA1.
Draschel
Bisonte: HE Time
13.06.2021 12:12:59
Subject: Bisonte: HE Time
Link on message: #12850458
stryker105mm, on Jun 13 2021 - 04:16, said: how about wg pull there head out the hole in the 3rd point of
contact and fix the prem ammo, which is one of the biggest issues
with this game Wg was supposed to correct this issue
last year but nope wg has there head so far in the dark, and he is
not a issue in this game, prem ammo, ebr, trash maps, 3 arty per
side these are the issues of this game,
Link on message: #12850458
stryker105mm, on Jun 13 2021 - 04:16, said: how about wg pull there head out the hole in the 3rd point of
contact and fix the prem ammo, which is one of the biggest issues
with this game Wg was supposed to correct this issue
last year but nope wg has there head so far in the dark, and he is
not a issue in this game, prem ammo, ebr, trash maps, 3 arty per
side these are the issues of this game, Draschel: How about fixing heavily armored heavy tanks with too small,
or non existent weakspots, and the bad players who like to
sit in the open with them and easily bounce off AP, hoping nobody
will shoot premium at them
_BobaFett
Leichttraktor Journey 2
13.06.2021 01:14:23
Draschel
Bisonte: HE Time
12.06.2021 23:03:52
Subject: Bisonte: HE Time
Link on message: #12850204
Link on message: #12850204
Draschel: This clip shows us alot, actually. With the upcoming changes,
the HE shot at the beginning vs Bisonte, wouldn't deal 84 damage
anymore and would likely be 0. Because of spaced armor. This is the
approach, to remove HE spam.However, the shot at the E75 that
dealt 0 damage midway through, if aimed slightly higher
at side hull and not tracks, would not deal 0
when 1.13 hits. This approach is to increase aiming, but
buff smaller caliber
LargeForeignObject
Tanks Time: Platoon Battles leaderboard update
12.06.2021 20:36:53
Subject: Tanks Time: Platoon Battles leaderboard update
Link on message: #12850116
Link on message: #12850116
LargeForeignObject: Tankers! As you may have noticed, there's been an update to
the leaderboard of the Tanks Time: Platoon Battles
tournament. It was caused by an error when platoon battles
were counted towards the participant's progress, even if he wasn't
the platoon commander. Such battles were withdrawn from progress,
which might have caused some leaderboard position shifts.Please,
check your progress in the leaderboard, as you may still
have a couple of battles to play and try to claim higher
leaderboard positions.
_BobaFett
Object 703 Version II
12.06.2021 16:48:31
Subject: Object 703 Version II
Link on message: #12849984
Link on message: #12849984
_BobaFett: Really good. It has limitations but overall it's very strong.
Draschel
Next batch of Tier 8 Premium buffs announced.
12.06.2021 10:40:06
Subject: Next batch of Tier 8 Premium buffs announced.
Link on message: #12849888
Trakks, on Jun 12 2021 - 02:51, said: Those CDC buffs don't look all that great.
Link on message: #12849888
Trakks, on Jun 12 2021 - 02:51, said: Those CDC buffs don't look all that great. Draschel: Great? They may as well not be there at all. Those aren't
buffs at all. They fix only one of the several, several,
several problems about the tank. FCM50T engine, DPM like
lansen or Indien panzer, 120mm turret armor are buffs. In
addition of course, with the dispersion and aim-time ones
above.
Draschel
Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
12.06.2021 10:34:38
Subject: Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
Link on message: #12849887
dindincf, on Jun 12 2021 - 05:26, said: Unless tanks.gg is broken 400m base VR + bia + SA + recon
= 444m VR.
Link on message: #12849887
dindincf, on Jun 12 2021 - 05:26, said: Unless tanks.gg is broken 400m base VR + bia + SA + recon
= 444m VR. Draschel: Use the +% equipment slot, for ventilation. Consumable,
Brother/Arms, Recon, SA --> 465m If you have bounty
ventilation, put rotator in +% slot, to receive 468mBounty rotator
maybe? Keep ventilation in +% slot and go. Directive is free
for you to choose whichever one you want
Adam_Antium
[Concurso] Catarata de emotes
12.06.2021 07:09:06
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12849847
Link on message: #12849847
Adam_Antium: ¡Felicitaciones a los ganadores! Tenemos los resultados del
concurso de emojis, los primeros cinco encontrarán que sus emotes
ya están implementados en el discord.Pepetruelo (7 días de premium)
Darkneess34_steel (7 días de premium) llCOFFEll (7 días de premium)
Dan_Lop (7 días de premium) Fedeg123 (7 días de premium) enuZi (3
días de premium) Cmdte_Gaucho (3 días de premium)
Fotengameyt (3 días de premium) Las demás entregas que
no estén mencionadas se deben a que no cumplieron con alguna de las
reglas del concurso. Los premios se acreditarán alrededor del final
de la siguiente semana (viernes 18). ¡Gracias por vuestra
participación y por hacer de esta una comunidad mejor! Cierro
el topic debido a que el concurso terminó. Estén atentos a las
próximas entregas.
Adam_Antina
[Concurso] Catarata de emotes
12.06.2021 07:09:06
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12849847
Link on message: #12849847
Adam_Antina: ¡Felicitaciones a los ganadores! Tenemos los resultados del
concurso de emojis, los primeros cinco encontrarán que sus emotes
ya están implementados en el discord.Pepetruelo (7 días de premium)
Darkneess34_steel (7 días de premium) llCOFFEll (7 días de premium)
Dan_Lop (7 días de premium) Fedeg123 (7 días de premium) enuZi (3
días de premium) Cmdte_Gaucho (3 días de premium)
Fotengameyt (3 días de premium) Las demás entregas que
no estén mencionadas se deben a que no cumplieron con alguna de las
reglas del concurso. Los premios se acreditarán alrededor del final
de la siguiente semana (viernes 18). ¡Gracias por vuestra
participación y por hacer de esta una comunidad mejor! Cierro
el topic debido a que el concurso terminó. Estén atentos a las
próximas entregas.
Draschel
Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
12.06.2021 07:05:23
Subject: Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
Link on message: #12849845
2MOEJOE, on Jun 12 2021 - 03:05, said: Why waste money/time on a tank that's not as good as the tech tree
tank or as good as the rock n roll offspring thing?I've had
all 3 the rock was the least desirable.
Link on message: #12849845
2MOEJOE, on Jun 12 2021 - 03:05, said: Why waste money/time on a tank that's not as good as the tech tree
tank or as good as the rock n roll offspring thing?I've had
all 3 the rock was the least desirable. Draschel: 5/1 RAAC is better than both T1LPC and the tech tree
Centurion I. Stop spreading nonsense.
Adam_Antina
[Concurso] Catarata de emotes
12.06.2021 05:32:56
Subject: [Concurso] Catarata de emotes
Link on message: #12849806
Link on message: #12849806
Adam_Antina: ¡Se cierra el concurso! ¡Pronto estaremos anunciando a los
ganadores por aquí y por Discord!¡Gracias a todos los que
participaron!
Draschel
Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
12.06.2021 05:01:06
Subject: Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
Link on message: #12849786
Link on message: #12849786
Draschel: Right, with Recon, SA, consumbable, brothers/arms, and improved
ventilation in% spot = 465m VR. That is more than
enough and expected for a tier 8.5/1 RAAC doesn't have superb
gun dispersion like LIS, T44100, or RH07 but is decent.
Especially combining its shell velocity and overall
accuracy.Because of it, I do not think stabilizer is necessary, and
the benefits of rotator are better. It allows you to shift quicker,
as you are quite large.
Jambijon
Special Missions, Consumable Discount, & the Object 274a
12.06.2021 03:48:52
Subject: Special Missions, Consumable Discount, & the Object 274a
Link on message: #12849742
Link on message: #12849742
Jambijon: Greetings Tankers!
It's the start of the weekend and if you haven't seen them yet we have some special missions and a 50% consumable discount going on! Also, the Object 274a in the Premium Shop. For details on the missions and offers, click on the links below: Special Bonus Missions & Consumable DiscountMISSIONS BEGIN: Friday, June 11 at 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Tuesday, June 15 at 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Offer: Object 274aOFFER BEGINS: June 11, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
OFFER ENDS: June 18, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
Have a good weekend and good
luck out there!
It's the start of the weekend and if you haven't seen them yet we have some special missions and a 50% consumable discount going on! Also, the Object 274a in the Premium Shop. For details on the missions and offers, click on the links below: Special Bonus Missions & Consumable DiscountMISSIONS BEGIN: Friday, June 11 at 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
MISSIONS END: Tuesday, June 15 at 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET Offer: Object 274aOFFER BEGINS: June 11, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
OFFER ENDS: June 18, 04:20 PT | 06:20 CT | 07:20 ET
Have a good weekend and good
luck out there! _BobaFett
Why the He@# do we not have this?
12.06.2021 03:42:58
_BobaFett
Chinese Heavies
12.06.2021 03:40:55
Subject: Chinese Heavies
Link on message: #12849739
Link on message: #12849739
_BobaFett: The tier 9 and 10 are pretty good. 8 and below are pretty meh
though.
_BobaFett
Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
12.06.2021 03:40:16
Subject: Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
Link on message: #12849737
Link on message: #12849737
_BobaFett: Rammer, Vents, Optics.
Draschel
Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
12.06.2021 03:05:05
Subject: Best builds for Centurion 5/1 RAAC?
Link on message: #12849718
Link on message: #12849718
Draschel: How strong is your crew?If you have Recon + Situational awareness
on your commander, optics won't be necessary.Ventilation, Rotator,
Rammer. I think 5/1 RAAC gun handling good enough that rotator
is fine, stabilizer isn't needed
Draschel
Next batch of Tier 8 Premium buffs announced.
12.06.2021 02:55:33
Subject: Next batch of Tier 8 Premium buffs announced.
Link on message: #12849713
wifibandit, on Jun 11 2021 - 04:10, said: There are buffs to the dispersion we'll have to wait and see how
much better it really is.
Link on message: #12849713
wifibandit, on Jun 11 2021 - 04:10, said: There are buffs to the dispersion we'll have to wait and see how
much better it really is.Draschel: Yes. There are buffs to dispersion. But the problem is,
T34 heavy has atrocious dispersion. It has atrocious
aim-time. Terrible gun handling in the tier, like Emil,
Emil 1951, IS3A, Brecher, VK100P all have BETTER gun handling than
T34.Sad part is, most will have better gun handling even after T34
buffs. It needs more like .22/.22/.15 not .25/.16Providing it
no aim-time boon? A slight dispersion boon? Really, it
is ridiculous. T34 bonuses here are okay, because of the
traverse and engine upgrades.
_BobaFett
Limitations on pfp size?
12.06.2021 01:26:16
Subject: Limitations on pfp size?
Link on message: #12849671
Link on message: #12849671
_BobaFett: You can resize it if it's too big, that's what I do. 200x200 or so
pixels usually works.
churchill50
Referral program contract, Tier 8 for the price of Tier 6
11.06.2021 23:39:18
Subject: Referral program contract, Tier 8 for the price of Tier 6
Link on message: #12849617
Link on message: #12849617
churchill50: Pretty sure grinding of any type in exchange for monetary
compensation is against the ToS...
_BobaFett
Not rigged, but predetermined losses
11.06.2021 21:56:32
Subject: Not rigged, but predetermined losses
Link on message: #12849554
OttoTheGreat_1, on Jun 11 2021 - 10:55, said: Nope just pointing out wo much RE+TRADS and trash is in this game
and how the players let WG fuk them and just keep taken it.
Link on message: #12849554
OttoTheGreat_1, on Jun 11 2021 - 10:55, said: Nope just pointing out wo much RE+TRADS and trash is in this game
and how the players let WG fuk them and just keep taken it._BobaFett: What's a retrad?
Elias_K_Grodin
Not rigged, but predetermined losses
11.06.2021 21:55:10
Subject: Not rigged, but predetermined losses
Link on message: #12849552
slavsickle, on Jun 11 2021 - 08:26, said: Lets say the game truly is random. 2 lights on my team were 43% and
46% wr, vs 2 enemy lights who were 58% and 53%. On
Prokhorovka. Two tomato lights were dead in under two
minutes, and the rest of the battle was a swift steamroll as two
enemy lights had free rein to do as they please. After
our lights were dead, several tanks retreated to the red line
to wait for their demise. It demoralizes the the whole team.
Games may not be rigged but broken matchmaker allowing for
such uneven dispersion of skill predetermine the outcome before the
battle starts. mm could have easily split one bad
and one good light between teams. You see this
with other tank types; One team will get competent players in key
tanks, taking key positions while the other will get keyboard
lickers who are camping spawn. Edited.
Link on message: #12849552
slavsickle, on Jun 11 2021 - 08:26, said: Lets say the game truly is random. 2 lights on my team were 43% and
46% wr, vs 2 enemy lights who were 58% and 53%. On
Prokhorovka. Two tomato lights were dead in under two
minutes, and the rest of the battle was a swift steamroll as two
enemy lights had free rein to do as they please. After
our lights were dead, several tanks retreated to the red line
to wait for their demise. It demoralizes the the whole team.
Games may not be rigged but broken matchmaker allowing for
such uneven dispersion of skill predetermine the outcome before the
battle starts. mm could have easily split one bad
and one good light between teams. You see this
with other tank types; One team will get competent players in key
tanks, taking key positions while the other will get keyboard
lickers who are camping spawn. Edited.Elias_K_Grodin: I don't think WR is a good indicator of player skill as you can
win/lose games and still have done either not much or killed off
most of the enemy team and still lose. Also losing light tanks
may hinder the teams ability for advanced scouting/spotting but I
hardly think the rest of the allied mediums, heavies, TDs and maybe
an SPG or two cannot do anything halt the enemy team's
advance. Instead of focusing on other players, it's about
focusing on you and your damage, experience, and support for your
teammates. Once you focus on how you can support the team and
provide good contributions to damaging enemy vehicles through
penetrating hits or spotting, then the focus is less on whether or
not your team has an adequate "WR". "When you're in command,
command." - Chester Nimitz, United States Navy
Hey_man_Gneis_shot
Not rigged, but predetermined losses
11.06.2021 21:55:10
Subject: Not rigged, but predetermined losses
Link on message: #12849552
slavsickle, on Jun 11 2021 - 08:26, said: Lets say the game truly is random. 2 lights on my team were 43% and
46% wr, vs 2 enemy lights who were 58% and 53%. On
Prokhorovka. Two tomato lights were dead in under two
minutes, and the rest of the battle was a swift steamroll as two
enemy lights had free rein to do as they please. After
our lights were dead, several tanks retreated to the red line
to wait for their demise. It demoralizes the the whole team.
Games may not be rigged but broken matchmaker allowing for
such uneven dispersion of skill predetermine the outcome before the
battle starts. mm could have easily split one bad
and one good light between teams. You see this
with other tank types; One team will get competent players in key
tanks, taking key positions while the other will get keyboard
lickers who are camping spawn. Edited.
Link on message: #12849552
slavsickle, on Jun 11 2021 - 08:26, said: Lets say the game truly is random. 2 lights on my team were 43% and
46% wr, vs 2 enemy lights who were 58% and 53%. On
Prokhorovka. Two tomato lights were dead in under two
minutes, and the rest of the battle was a swift steamroll as two
enemy lights had free rein to do as they please. After
our lights were dead, several tanks retreated to the red line
to wait for their demise. It demoralizes the the whole team.
Games may not be rigged but broken matchmaker allowing for
such uneven dispersion of skill predetermine the outcome before the
battle starts. mm could have easily split one bad
and one good light between teams. You see this
with other tank types; One team will get competent players in key
tanks, taking key positions while the other will get keyboard
lickers who are camping spawn. Edited.Hey_man_Gneis_shot: I don't think WR is a good indicator of player skill as you can
win/lose games and still have done either not much or killed off
most of the enemy team and still lose. Also losing light tanks
may hinder the teams ability for advanced scouting/spotting but I
hardly think the rest of the allied mediums, heavies, TDs and maybe
an SPG or two cannot do anything halt the enemy team's
advance. Instead of focusing on other players, it's about
focusing on you and your damage, experience, and support for your
teammates. Once you focus on how you can support the team and
provide good contributions to damaging enemy vehicles through
penetrating hits or spotting, then the focus is less on whether or
not your team has an adequate "WR". "When you're in command,
command." - Chester Nimitz, United States Navy
Cmdr_AF
WoT's Next One-Year Anniversary T-Shirt Design Contest (US, Canada, and M...
11.06.2021 21:15:31
Subject: WoT's Next One-Year Anniversary T-Shirt Design Contest (US, Canada, and M...
Link on message: #12849525
Link on message: #12849525
Cmdr_AF: In case you haven't heard the winning designs have been chosen! We
received so many wonderful creations it was hard to pick just 3.
But here are the results: Congratulations to Warrhorse for
taking the #1 spot with his hand-drawn design! (Now available in
the WoT Amazon Store: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B095LBG3Q6)
In a close 2nd
is HELLBOUNDflame 
And in an even
closer 3rd place is pylorns 
Thank you to
everyone that created designs for this contest. You really helped
to make our first anniversary a special one! <3
In a close 2nd
is HELLBOUNDflame And in an even
closer 3rd place is pylorns Thank you to
everyone that created designs for this contest. You really helped
to make our first anniversary a special one! <3Adam_Antium
[Supertest] T34, AMX CDC, KV-5, IS-6, 112, WZ-111 y T-34-3
11.06.2021 19:21:12
Subject: [Supertest] T34, AMX CDC, KV-5, IS-6, 112, WZ-111 y T-34-3
Link on message: #12849435
Link on message: #12849435
Adam_Antium: No sé si diría que 10mm es un valor débil. En un tanque con MM
preferencial hace una diferencia considerable; para usar un
pensamiento inverso y considerar su impacto, pensemos qué
diferencia haría tener 10mm menos de penetración. Abre más
posibilidades y otorga una estabilidad mayor al daño que uno puede
colocar por partida con munición estándar. Sé que me hubiese
encantado tener 10mm más de penetración con mi 112, especialmente
considerando que la munición HEAT no es la más confiable. Por
otro lado, recordemos que estos cambios pueden modificarse y que no
son definitivos.
Adam_Antina
[Supertest] T34, AMX CDC, KV-5, IS-6, 112, WZ-111 y T-34-3
11.06.2021 19:21:12
Subject: [Supertest] T34, AMX CDC, KV-5, IS-6, 112, WZ-111 y T-34-3
Link on message: #12849435
Link on message: #12849435
Adam_Antina: No sé si diría que 10mm es un valor débil. En un tanque con MM
preferencial hace una diferencia considerable; para usar un
pensamiento inverso y considerar su impacto, pensemos qué
diferencia haría tener 10mm menos de penetración. Abre más
posibilidades y otorga una estabilidad mayor al daño que uno puede
colocar por partida con munición estándar. Sé que me hubiese
encantado tener 10mm más de penetración con mi 112, especialmente
considerando que la munición HEAT no es la más confiable. Por
otro lado, recordemos que estos cambios pueden modificarse y que no
son definitivos.
Реклама | Adv