Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Russian game Russian Influence...
Link on message: #12998475
Learn2AimNoobs, on Feb 12 2022 - 04:34, said: Not really, Russia stands no chance.
Link on message: #12998475

TeriyakiTanker: I don't even know why I am asking but do you really believe
this? Most serious military analysts are predicting the fall
of Kiev in a matter of days, and the West has not promised any
actual physical aid to the Ukraine and frankly short of large
numbers of troops intervening this seems like a done deal if Russia
actually pulls the trigger. And as far as your thought that
the West would deploy nuclear weapons, that just seems
laughable. Really don't see anyone NATO member even
considering using nuclear weapons to protect a non-NATO
country. Not sure you have thought through this situation.
Subject: Caliban probably wasn't a good idea.
Link on message: #12998471
Tilith, on Feb 12 2022 - 11:31, said: If we are gonna bring back
Link on message: #12998471

Draschel: 40 degrees is NOT a poor angle Maus. You kidding? And caliban
doesn't need to aim much if it rolls into what it wants to shoot at
100m away. KV2, OI, Oho do it all the time. Caliban does as
well
Subject: US LT needs a new Tier-10
Link on message: #12998468
Link on message: #12998468
Draschel: HE changes were really a double edge sword. Not only can't sheridan
and T49 just spam HE anymore, but Sheridan spaced armor is easily
pen by HE instead of just splashing it
Subject: Caliban probably wasn't a good idea.
Link on message: #12998452
Link on message: #12998452
Draschel: Remember KV2 had 206 HEAT pen? Yes, it was not a good idea, and it
was removed. Luckily before KV2® arrived Not sure why they
went with the exact same idea, on similar playing tank.....Did
they think history wouldn't repeat? Don't really care about
the 180 HESH gimmick, that can stay. But 292 allows this thing to
threaten even Maus angled 40 degrees. 6'' AP pen
should be 235, like old E100 gun. Increase the alpha
to 650 like 705A, HESH velocity should be closer to OI and
KV2 HE.
Subject: Is Grille 15 the worst tank in the entire game?
Link on message: #12998450
TastyPastry, on Feb 12 2022 - 07:56, said: You can tell if a player is good by their opinion of the
Chi-Ri. Good players think it's good, bad players can't make it
work. 390 clip potential that's fairly reliable at tier 7,
decent mobility, and a nice slab of HP for a medium.
Link on message: #12998450

Draschel: I would not say 'good' but it is nevertheless usable. Is it
tank you keep, no. But is it the dreadful thing everyone says,
no.The gun should be 135. Playing Chi Ri is a poor mans Skoda T25.
The things you miss like APCR, speed, camo - i don't think the HP
is worth it.
Subject: Is Grille 15 the worst tank in the entire game?
Link on message: #12998392
Link on message: #12998392
Draschel: what i find very interesting, and entirely stupid, is a very
voluminous and rotund, 67.5T Ferdinand has more camo than Grille.
3.0 pts base more, to be exact. This is ridiculous. The least they
can do is give Grille camo like Ferdinand.
Subject: Is Grille 15 the worst tank in the entire game?
Link on message: #12998390
Link on message: #12998390
Draschel: Completely let down by massive bloom problems. This thing can have
rotation mech, gun layer, aiming class as its equipment and the gun
will STILL SHOOT WILDY into the dirt if you even attempt at
shooting on the move or auto-aim. The grille is
certainly not new player friendly. But in the clever hands of
experienced players, it can be quite dangerous because of speed and
the turret. Frankly, this thing needs to have its nerfs from before
reversed, and the qualities returned. There is no reason to even
think grille with its former qualities would be as good as
before. Return the engine power to 900. The reverse back to
20.Return gun depression to -8, give it 350 HEAT like
VK720130' traverse of Skorp G, increase turret rotation to 60'
/ '60
Subject: So the AP AMX 30...
Link on message: #12998375
Kefic, on Feb 12 2022 - 03:56, said: I highly recommend you jump right into the RAAC after you mark the
FV4202. You are going to think you are a god.
Link on message: #12998375

Draschel: Unlikely. Hate all british mediums. Except matilda.
Subject: So the AP AMX 30...
Link on message: #12998354
Link on message: #12998354
Draschel: RoflRAAC and 7/1 are the same tank except minor, real minor changes
in gun handling and lots of up-scale DPM with the same gun''Trying
to play'' Very nice, funny guy. You do that, you
''try'' and lets see the result.
Subject: T92 LT compared to other T8 lights?
Link on message: #12998329
Link on message: #12998329
Jaguarz: Not great, could use an autoloader imo
Subject: Physics abuse is a game breaker
Link on message: #12998327
Link on message: #12998327
Jaguarz: Looks like bot platoon and clan Clan Average Recent WN8 66
Subject: T92 LT compared to other T8 lights?
Link on message: #12998326
Link on message: #12998326
Draschel: Its not a meta tank. Is it excruciatingly horrible, like HK12?
No. But it is not good, and is average if anything. The buffs did
not help it much. M41 bulldog in tech tree is better because of the
layout and DPM The big problems surrounding T92 are the rear
fighting compartment. This makes using gun depression difficult as
it always ends of cresting anyway, or rounding corners entire body
first. In addition, this frequently causes not just driver
dead......but engine damage and fires too. A huge problem I see
playing mine, is this tanks propensity to 'rock' like a boat, in
rough water. Really noticed in 1st person gunnery view. Makes
shooting really annoying. Have had the same problems with object
416. If I were to have buffed T92 to make it more useful, I would
have added 170 alpha (which it should have like Bulldog and
M41D) instead of the 150, and get rid of this 'rocking'
feature
Subject: Arty coming back?
Link on message: #12998300
TheRealSerapth, on Feb 11 2022 - 23:06, said: Tier 8+ the infection is nowhere near as bad, but low to mid tiers
with LeFH on sale and a mission running, it's pure cancer.
Link on message: #12998300

Draschel: kudos to you if you can say such things and not get a strike.
I do.you must be very popular. not me, in the chess club. Go
figure.
Subject: So the AP AMX 30...
Link on message: #12998297
Link on message: #12998297
Draschel: Oh, and most certainly. If you 3-mark a tank, you very very
very very likely know how either A) use, B) cannot rely, C) know
if you even have any armor. Except tier 5s
Subject: So the AP AMX 30...
Link on message: #12998295
2Fantastic, on Feb 12 2022 - 00:27, said: with that said it would be significantly more relevant to three
mark the tank we are talking about.
Link on message: #12998295

Draschel: Why does it matter? 7/1 is a harder mark, with the same tank.
The 7/1 is RAAC with more DPM, but a tier up. I used the 20pdr B,
not the 105 L7I am not exactly sure what the metric for damage
blocked in a T9 med should be, good or bad - but mine is better
than his, in his Conquer. lol?Don't know why anyone
would play it now, E50s buffs have made it considerably better,
even if someone did it like me and used L100 88......as for
why I have not played it? Just bought it, 2 months ago. Have yet to
equip it, and currently completing FV4202 and CaernarAX
firsthttps://ibb.co/LxMZ8WM
Subject: My first two-mark and then another one! Mediums r us
Link on message: #12998229
Dantooine_Sniper, on Feb 11 2022 - 23:22, said: I feel the same pain, t 44 is bad but sometimes works great as
spotter/flanker almost like t 43 that's the way i've got almost 6
level one MoE but 190 of pen??? EVEN TVP VTU HAS A BETTER GUN!
Dantooine_Sniper, on Feb 11 2022 - 23:26, said: He's mostly very bad, but people say t 54 is good what i doubt
because of that 212 pen with top gun even tier 8 tanks are better
than this
Link on message: #12998229

Jaguarz:

Jaguarz: Powercreep for you, that said the Bourasque is a beast with
only 190 pen and the t-54 used to be the best t9 medium in game,
cant be the King forever
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998223
Spam_Goose, on Feb 12 2022 - 00:02, said: *munches on popcorn* think the issues you are having are
because of you and you alone.
Link on message: #12998223

1LT_Dwayne: Whatever the issue is I'm done playing this game and any WG
games. I've played games for maybe 20+ years now and I have never
seen so much frustration for a game on a forum including myself.
With the direction and crap they constantly sells players, even if
there would be no rigging, the company is just victim of their own
garbage.
Subject: February Challenge Sponsored by Verizon
Link on message: #12998192
durandal78, on Feb 10 2022 - 17:49, said: It just updated, now it shows me at 49 points, it has 1 day delay,
I was at 79 when I logged out last night.
Says, on Feb 10 2022 - 23:43, said: Its def not refreshing every hour. Maybe every 24 hours or
so, i'm not sure there. But its at least a day behind.
Link on message: #12998192

KRZYBooP:

KRZYBooP: Okay cool, I was given a guestimate about the update on the
web page. I will change my original post and thank y'all for
confirmation.

Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998167
TheRealSerapth, on Feb 11 2022 - 20:35, said: Huh?
Link on message: #12998167

Draschel: don’t get me wrong, SA bot farms exist. I am not saying they don’t,
they certainly do.but not inside a T29. Why say it, and whats it
have to do with anything here
Subject: KRZY-Takes: Gun Rammer and what are your other two equipment choices?
Link on message: #12998083
GSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Feb 10 2022 - 16:14, said: I have serious questions about a camo net on an E-75 TS..
Link on message: #12998083

KRZYBooP: Fair point!
I believe I equipped it for Frontline and tried to hopefully get shots off without being seen by other heavy tanks.
I believe I equipped it for Frontline and tried to hopefully get shots off without being seen by other heavy tanks.
Subject: KRZY-Takes: What do you do when you are bottom tier?
Link on message: #12998081
Link on message: #12998081
KRZYBooP: Howdy Boom Jockeys! Match Maker is the best, and always has my
best interests at heart... This statement plus many more have
been used in sarcasm since the game began. I am sure many players
have other choice words to say about it, but that is not my
question. My question is, what do you do when the beloved MM
deals you a bad hand tier-wise with tanks?
The most recent changes
have allowed more variations in the games when it comes to who you
are battling, and at least it won't stick your tier 5 tank in a
battle only against other tier 7's. That used to be the case back
in the day.

Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998073
Jer1413, on Feb 11 2022 - 20:20, said: Sorry, I just thought we were simply talking
about the T29 and then the possible effect of platooning on win
rate. You seem to be blowing it all out of proportion.
Link on message: #12998073

1LT_Dwayne: Sorry about this. I uninstalled this game. It's all the frustations
that accumalted overtime about this company. Just cant take it
anymore. I never seen a game where battle mechanics and
graphics(i mean the realistic layout of tanks) can be so good but
eveything else is garbage. MM, maps, rng, aiming time, dispersion,
ebrs, arty, op tanks, premium rounds are all screwed to make money.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998069
TheRealSerapth, on Feb 11 2022 - 18:07, said: For the record, with your performance in the tank I would roughly
expect you to be about a 48%ish winrate, They may also
harvest bots on SA server, but I would really expect higher DPG
results if so. So my money is on platooning.
Link on message: #12998069

Draschel: when you say stuff like that, I really question the content
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998060
TheRealSerapth, on Feb 11 2022 - 20:07, said: Bye Felicia.
Link on message: #12998060

1LT_Dwayne: Bye addicted garbage!
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998058
Jer1413, on Feb 11 2022 - 20:02, said: That escalated quickly.
Link on message: #12998058

1LT_Dwayne: Yeah? Dont you think wg are like politicians? always putting money
first and don't give a crapabout quality and fun? Yet people are
spending like idiots and support every things they do. If this
conversation does not make sense to you it make sense to me when i
think of all the factors that frustates me. Uninstalling is the
best thing i can do. Never again ill buy or play a game by WG.
I did the same with EA sports years ago and i don't miss it at all.
Now I encourage every players that feel addicted to quit
because its probably like more than 50% of this player base.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998049
GSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Feb 11 2022 - 19:49, said: Ranked is open to everyone, it's simply that it
doesn't work for everyone due to the nature of climbing
ranks by earning chevrons with better performances. Obviously
bottom-of-the-barrel players tend to get pushed out early on, but
one of the main points that probably kicks people out is simply how
unfun to play Ranked is; for everyone. Even average players in
the long run can earn the rewards from it, if they can endure
playing the damn mode long enough By allowing (or
arguably, forcing) platooning in it, you would simply
exasperate this problem. It's not some matter of "git gud" or
anything, you'd simply be screwing over a good portion of the
people playing the mode and make it even less enjoyable. You
still haven't exactly provided an adequate reasoning as to why
players shouldn't be allowed to platoon in the
Casual/Social/Unranked/Quickplay mode.
Link on message: #12998049

1LT_Dwayne: Whatever I done with this garbage. Uninstalling right away. Now go
to the battle and spam Prem and make sure you platoon with other
60% like yourself. And please come to the forum and make sure you
take wg side for the wonderful decisions they make. And don't
forget to buy the next prem tank to. Good
buy!
Subject: This WZ-114 really make me sick
Link on message: #12998043
Link on message: #12998043
Draschel: They took an STI…..removed all the side armour but increased the
gun depression then they looked at T34 heavy and 122TM, mixed
them together *to add* to this weird STIBut in trying satisfy
people, they gave it stellar class HP Pool. and there we have
it, 114 if we look at the history of buffs for T34 heavy….view
range, traverse, rotation, Dispersion, aim-time, engine……suffice to
say 114 can be buffed the same ways.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998042
GSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Feb 11 2022 - 19:40, said: You know how people always complain about games being too
quick and whatnot? Ranked is basically this. Because of the nature
of the mode snowballs are vastly more prevalent in my experience,
once one team gets the ball rolling the other team typically
collapses very quickly. This would be massively overblown if you
added platoons in as they could easily coordinate and get that ball
rolling a whole lot quicker. It would end up being a case of "haha
get screwed" if you don't platoon, which is a kick in the
teeth to most players grinding Ranked. I'm sure platoons of
coordinated Krans, STBs and whatnot would be a blast to play with.
Why isn't it toxic in Randoms? Because Randoms is Randoms.
It's the "Casual/Social/Unranked" mode that every MP Game has. Most
folks are playing to have fun and shoot other tanks. Is it fun for
new players to face a platoon of 55%ers? Probably not, but at the
end of the day that's one battle and they can quickly move onto the
next. There is no penalty nor any outright reward to strive for,
you're simply playing the game, shooting tanks and getting shot.
Not everyone is playing this game for competitive sake, not even
higher ranked players.
Link on message: #12998042

1LT_Dwayne: I think you are spewing non sense here. People in ranked are
better players and I heard that better players had learn to "git
gud".
Subject: So the AP AMX 30...
Link on message: #12998039
Link on message: #12998039
Draschel: I actually just bought RAAC for 30% discount. However it doesn’t
have equipment or exterior camo.
I am completing FV4202 and Caernarvon AX field mods the time being
I am completing FV4202 and Caernarvon AX field mods the time being
Subject: So the AP AMX 30...
Link on message: #12998037
Kefic, on Feb 11 2022 - 14:06, said: Draschel...have you played the RAAC? To call the armor on it
"meh" is laughable.
Link on message: #12998037

Draschel: Do you have 7/1 three marked? I do. 90 battles, nearly 3.2k
combinedand the armour on that one is bad. How much different is it
on RAAC?
even in tier 7 matches I don’t trust it for anything else other than blocking tier 7 lights and meds AP in auto aim, or HE ammo types When I call something better than AMXAP, that don’t make it good. 2 > 1, does that make 2 high?
Type, T54Mod, Suka Pershing are good armour mediums.
even in tier 7 matches I don’t trust it for anything else other than blocking tier 7 lights and meds AP in auto aim, or HE ammo types When I call something better than AMXAP, that don’t make it good. 2 > 1, does that make 2 high?
Type, T54Mod, Suka Pershing are good armour mediums.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998036
GSOR3301_AVR_FS, on Feb 11 2022 - 18:44, said: To put an example of this forward, here is my mate Chaos. I
dunno how long ago it is he played this as we haven't done VIIs in
a long time, but point aside is he pretty much plays 80-90% Of the
game with me in a platoon, leading to things like this:
Because.. this is
a game, and playing with friends in-game is meant to be fun?
There's not some rule or reason to disallow platooning in Randoms
(akin to "Casual" or "Social" for other games) just because of WR
Boosting. Also, allowing platooning in Ranked would also
just be toxic as **** to that gamemode.
Link on message: #12998036


1LT_Dwayne: Because.. this is a game, and playing with friends
in-game is meant to be fun? There's not some rule or reason to
disallow platooning in Randoms (akin to "Casual" or "Social" for
other games) just because of WR Boosting. Also, allowing
platooning in Ranked would also just be toxic as **** to that
gamemode. Why it would be toxic? and why it's not toxic in random?
Because I sure a new player must really like facing three 55%
players.
Subject: Arty coming back?
Link on message: #12998030
Link on message: #12998030
Draschel: We are just lucky its not worse. Not just the leFH18-2SU8 is far
more dangerous than M44, it hasn’t been nerfedLorraine is more
dangerous than GWPanther, it hasn’t been nerfed but people
have their good crews in M44, GWPanther so they get taken
out i think higher tier arta has more or less been stymied,
especially considering indirect nerfs, individual Conquer GC nerf,
ranked battles changes — but low tiers are bad. AMX
AM47, Bison, SU5, Sturm pz, SU122A, Grille, M41 are all big
problems, not just the commonly known M44 spam
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998023
spud_tuber, on Feb 11 2022 - 19:14, said: First, I'm going to agree that the guy on the right is almost
certainly playing in toons a good bit. Have you looked to see how
many BIA and CC medals he has relative to battle count?(well, not
perfect because dynamic toons, but could give an idea)
Secondly, his stats don't look that much better at a glance, but there's a pretty significant difference in your KPG and destruction ratio. He's securing kills and getting hostile guns out of the fight. While not enough to make up the difference in WR, it would certainly help push him up over 50%.
Thirdly, it seems he is likely a more aggressive player than you. He has only a somewhat higher survival rate than you, despite winning a lot more. He actually takes more average damage per battle than you, despite the higher survival rate. If he's trading HP for kills and/or map position better than you are, that may also make a point or 2 difference in WR. Not saying he is, he may actually be over aggressive for solo play and relying on a toon mate to cover him. But it is something to think about, and question your own play to see if you're being too defensive in your decisions, instead of gaining map control.
Link on message: #12998023

Secondly, his stats don't look that much better at a glance, but there's a pretty significant difference in your KPG and destruction ratio. He's securing kills and getting hostile guns out of the fight. While not enough to make up the difference in WR, it would certainly help push him up over 50%.
Thirdly, it seems he is likely a more aggressive player than you. He has only a somewhat higher survival rate than you, despite winning a lot more. He actually takes more average damage per battle than you, despite the higher survival rate. If he's trading HP for kills and/or map position better than you are, that may also make a point or 2 difference in WR. Not saying he is, he may actually be over aggressive for solo play and relying on a toon mate to cover him. But it is something to think about, and question your own play to see if you're being too defensive in your decisions, instead of gaining map control.
1LT_Dwayne: Yeah maybe. I'll try to pay attention to the map more often and do
my best. One thing is hard to understand is when someone says that
you only have to make a difference 1 out of 20 battles to increase
your wr by 5%. With that said why it is so hard to improve your wr
by 1%? I can't influence 1 out a hundred battles in a t29?
Anyway done ranting thanks for the replies. Time to battle.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12998019
Seraph062, on Feb 11 2022 - 18:49, said: My WAG would be that you're running a premium account some of the
time and he isn't. That +50% XP counts towards the stats that
show up in game (and is the big reason why the XP stats are not
very useful for comparing players). My reasoning is
mostly based off the fact that your maximum XP is 2154 and his is
1554, which suggests to me that your 'best' game was with premium,
while his wasn't. In particular the fact that his wasn't means that
he's very rarely had premium on when playing his T29 because
getting 1042 base XP (1563 w/ premium) shouldn't be that
uncommon.
Link on message: #12998019

1LT_Dwayne: I never payed for 1 single day of premium beside buying some loot
boxes this Christmas and I dont remember playing the t29 in that
period.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12997987
TheRealSerapth, on Feb 11 2022 - 18:16, said: You are allowed to disagree, but you are also wrong by just
about every measurable metric. The T29 is among the best of
tier 7 heavies and tier 7s in general. Only a few like
amx13/57, King Tiger C and maybe E25 are on the same epic level of
the T29. The AE Phase 1 is almost the same, its almost a tier
9 version of the T29, although the big difference for the AE is it
has competition from tanks like the Conq and is outright worse than
the Concept1B. It's still a very strong tank at tier 9.
If you're struggling with the armor, that's you frankly.
Yes, you can be penned, you can't just sit in the open and
expect to bounce shot after shot after shot... (although when top
tier, you can often even do this...). But if you are finding
the T29 and AE Phase 1 armor lacking, you are certainly playing
them wrong. There is a reason the T29 is near the top of tier
7 heavies for winrate and IS at the top for games played, it's a
very good tank. A replay or two may be in order to figure out
why the armor isn't working for you.
golruul, on Feb 11 2022 - 18:24, said: Guy on the right probably platoons a lot in that tank. That
kind of DPG/APG doesn't get a 58% win rate over that many battles.
Average xp unfortunately isn't a good number to use because
premium account pollutes it -- you can only compare if you 100%
know for sure that each battle for both accounts use/don't use it
for all the battles.
Link on message: #12997987

1LT_Dwayne: If you look at the stats you can see my armor use efficiency
is higher than his so saying i dont know how to use the armor is
kinda wrong. But anyway I will continue to play the t29, try do to
my best and see what i can do.

1LT_Dwayne: If platooning can boost your wr like this why it is allowed
in random? From my opinion it should only be allowed in ranked.
Subject: Incoming! Update 1.16: Join the Common Test!
Link on message: #12997983
Link on message: #12997983
Einzelganger7: I love the 3D styles (especially the one for Leopard 1), though it
is unfortunate that they have the base coat of pain instead of camo
pattern like all plervious Battle Pass 3D styles, oh well...
Subject: Incoming! Project Uplift
Link on message: #12997979
Link on message: #12997979
KRZYBooP: Howdy Boom Jockeys! During the month of January we held two
charity streams for the Ontario Regiment Tank Museum for their
project Uplift initiative. It was to allow people with
disabilities access to APC rides around their dirt track. With only
a small goal of 6k to start out. Our players offered a total of 19K
to help fund this project. While a little late, we at WG
and the Ontario Regiment Tank Museum would like to express a very
big Tank you to everyone that participated and contributed to the
campaign. Y'all keep rocking it! More
information on the campaign can be found HERE.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12997962
TheRealSerapth, on Feb 11 2022 - 18:07, said: For the record, with your performance in the tank I would roughly
expect you to be about a 48%ish winrate, which is about a 50/50
coin toss rate once you factor in ties. The T29 is a pretty
critical tank for anchoring a flank when top tier and if you're
basically dishing out less damage than you take, you're somewhat
(but not massively) a liability to your team, especially if the
opposing team gets a good T29 player. It's the kind of tank
that is a difference maker. If you are seeking advice into
how to improve in that tank, you've got some great advice already.
I can chime in personally too, as I had really overwhelmingly
meh stats over all in the T29 (just slightly better then you, maybe
300dpg more, and just slightly higher winrate at 50%), but my
recents are more inline with where I expect to play these days,
pushing closer to 2k DPG and a much higher winrate. First,
positioning is everything. Your Hull is butter, but your
turret is god tier. You're not really fast enough to change
flanks, so make sure you choose well initially. If
you can't hull down, you can somewhat side scrape, but hull down
would be preferred. If you don't know good hull down
positions on maps, that is certainly where I would start. If
you don't know how to side scrape well, that's definitely another
area I would work on. When you are top tier in the t29 YOU
NEED to be on the front line. You need to be holding a flank,
if you sit back and leave it to others, you are failing your team,
hard. This is an anchor tank top tier if there ever was one.
If you aren't closest to the enemy, you're probably playing
it wrong. That said, if you are closest to the enemy AND are
alone, you're also playing it wrong. Then you are bottom
tier, while you still have decent armor, you can't rely on it.
So be sure to play less aggressively. It's ok to play
on the medium flank when bottom tier if needed. It's actually
useful to have a bottom tier equipment load out with say Turbo
instead of say, hardening, that makes you more flexible. Once
you can't rely on your armor anymore, you are no longer your teams
anchor. That said, the gun and ok turret armor (at tier 9
that is), means the T29 is still a very useful tank when bottom
tier, just it's up to others on your team to do the heavy lifting.
-------------- The other aspect here is the other
play you've linked the stats of. This person is MASSIVELY
over performing their actual performance level when it comes to
winrate. There are a few reasons this can happen... one is
luck. Even over a 1000 games, some people have a giant
horseshoe up their arses. Just as many of us have a cursed
tank where no matter how well we perform, we lose (hello Progetto).
More likely though there is something else to it. This
person may routinely platoon with a Unicum who is basically
carrying them. They may also harvest bots on SA server, but I
would really expect higher DPG results if so. So my money is
on platooning. ----- So basically TL;DR, you
are performing about where I would expect in a WR capacity, based
on how you are using the tank. The person you are linking is
massively overperforming. Basically they are the outlier, not
you. If you want to improve yourself, there's great advice in
this thread. If you want to know why others win more, welcome
to one of life's great mysteries...
Link on message: #12997962

1LT_Dwayne: If I have less dmg per game than him and less victory how do
you explain me having more xp per game than him? Because when you
lose you don't have double xp.
Subject: T29 stats comparison
Link on message: #12997956
Markd73, on Feb 11 2022 - 17:48, said: My T29 winrate is 58.93% and overall winrate of 52.62%. The
T29 is one of best tier 7 heavies and I am a little surprised that
you are underperforming in that vehicle relative to your overall
stats. Questions: Perhaps you are going to weaker flank more
often and trying to hold off too many enemies? The reason I mention
this is your OP "I feel that my teammates constantly screw me.
Rarely I have support to watch my flanks." That sounds like you are
perhaps alone or mostly alone on the weak flank. T29 is not the
fastest or slowest heavy at Tier 7 and has less DPM than say a
Tiger H. It requires a bit more map awareness for good hull down
positions, and has more trouble than the Tiger H in using raw DPM
to get out of a situation. Are you struggling to find good hull
down positions? What is your playstyle when top vs bottom
tier? The T29 is an absolute beast when top tier and when I
was playing, I would be very aggressive in mine when top tier. I
would then resort to a less aggressive support heavy role and
follow the push from my team, looking for good hull down spots to
harass the enemy. Are you platooning much with the T29? This game
is 1 vs 29 and the only people you can really trust are your
platoon mates. Maybe platoon with other players that can help with
the T29 weaknesses? I am sure there are other questions, but
I cannot come up with any without more coffee. Perhaps some replays
would provide better data? Thoughts from other posters?
Link on message: #12997956

1LT_Dwayne: I try to watch the map as I can and try to always stay
in a hull down spot if I have the chance to. You see that's where I
disagree with you. You say it's one of the best tier 7 tank but I
don't think it's any near that. I find any hull down tank not
really good because they have so many weak spots and there are
plenty of way to counter them. It's the same for the AE phase 1. I
have bad wr in it for the same reasons. When I see a hull down t29
on the red team and I can't pen him do you think I will stay there
for 5min brawling with him? You turn away and go pick another
fight. No damage for him.
Subject: You called me a idiot and a coward about 20 minutes ago in a battle.
Link on message: #12997944
dunniteowl, on Feb 11 2022 - 09:54, said: Good LORD, man, who really cares what others say in chat?
Let it go. OvO
Link on message: #12997944

churchill50: Not to mention making the, most likely false, assumption that
whoever he's talking about will even see this post.
Реклама | Adv