Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: Company leader will decide if your WR is enough
Link on message: #2097228
Quote
MrMif (10 Июн 2012 - 09:01)
писал:
Будет ли возможность при создании ротных боёв сделать так сказать "Фейс контроль" ?
Чтобы командир смог при создании роты (если захочет) выставить проходимый % побед игроков для входа?
Например выставил 50+% побед и игроки ниже уровнем попросту не смогут зайти в эту роту...
Serb: Будет. Но установить планку выше собственного процента побед командиру будет нельзя.
Link on message: #2097228
Quote
MrMif (10 Июн 2012 - 09:01)
писал:Будет ли возможность при создании ротных боёв сделать так сказать "Фейс контроль" ?
Чтобы командир смог при создании роты (если захочет) выставить проходимый % побед игроков для входа?
Например выставил 50+% побед и игроки ниже уровнем попросту не смогут зайти в эту роту...
Serb: Будет. Но установить планку выше собственного процента побед командиру будет нельзя.
LiannaSilverwind: Translation
MrMif: Will you add an ability to have some kind of "face control" for company battles? So that company leader will be able (if he wishes so) to announce required win ratio for the players who want to join his company? For example he announces 50+% win ratio and players below that ratio will not be able to join his company.
SerB: We will. But he won't be able to make the margin higher than his own win ratio.
What do you think about it?
Will it help the game, company battles or community in general? Will it motivate players to focus further on their personal skills or just try to "farm good stats" somewhere?
MrMif: Will you add an ability to have some kind of "face control" for company battles? So that company leader will be able (if he wishes so) to announce required win ratio for the players who want to join his company? For example he announces 50+% win ratio and players below that ratio will not be able to join his company.
SerB: We will. But he won't be able to make the margin higher than his own win ratio.
What do you think about it?
Will it help the game, company battles or community in general? Will it motivate players to focus further on their personal skills or just try to "farm good stats" somewhere?
Subject: Не веришь в стату? Не попадешь в роту!
Link on message: #2097210
Quote Q: Здравствуйте.
Будет ли возможность при создании ротных боёв сделать так сказать "Фейс контроль" ?
Чтобы командир смог при создании роты (если захочет) выставить проходимый % побед игроков для входа?
Например выставил 50+% побед и игроки ниже уровнем попросту не смогут зайти в эту роту...
Спасибо.
SerB: Будет. Но установить планку выше собственного процента побед командиру будет нельзя.
Link on message: #2097210
Quote Q: Здравствуйте.
Будет ли возможность при создании ротных боёв сделать так сказать "Фейс контроль" ?
Чтобы командир смог при создании роты (если захочет) выставить проходимый % побед игроков для входа?
Например выставил 50+% побед и игроки ниже уровнем попросту не смогут зайти в эту роту...
Спасибо.
SerB: Будет. Но установить планку выше собственного процента побед командиру будет нельзя.
LiannaSilverwind: Ссылка:
http://forum.worldof...st__p__10427840
http://forum.worldof...st__p__10427840
Subject: D-Day Contest
Link on message: #2097163
1scream, on 09 June 2012 - 06:20 PM, said: What is the replay file?
Link on message: #2097163
1scream, on 09 June 2012 - 06:20 PM, said: What is the replay file?supercharge:
Hi,
First of all you need to enable the 'Battle recording' function in the 'Game' tab of the in-game settings.
If you want to watch it after the battle please make sure you close the game client. Next open the game folder (default location: C:\Games\World_of_Tanks\) and search for REPLAYS folder there. All your battle recordings are being stored in the folder for you.
In order to run it just click on the the battle recording file with an extension *.wotreplay.
Hi,
First of all you need to enable the 'Battle recording' function in the 'Game' tab of the in-game settings.
If you want to watch it after the battle please make sure you close the game client. Next open the game folder (default location: C:\Games\World_of_Tanks\) and search for REPLAYS folder there. All your battle recordings are being stored in the folder for you.
In order to run it just click on the the battle recording file with an extension *.wotreplay.
Subject: D-Day Contest
Link on message: #2097109
The_Pwner, on 05 June 2012 - 08:11 PM, said: WG still didnt answer. As expected...
Link on message: #2097109
The_Pwner, on 05 June 2012 - 08:11 PM, said: WG still didnt answer. As expected...supercharge:
one submission per category
one submission per category
Subject: Your account has been blocked.
Link on message: #2097024
ameska, on 10 June 2012 - 11:17 AM, said: slm hesabım kullanıcı ismimden dolayı gecici kapatılmış anlam
veremedigim 2-3 aydır kullanıyorum bir sorun yoktuda şimdi neden
böyle birsey oldu acaba...bide ne zaman acılır gerekirsede
kullanucı adımı nereden degiştirebilrim bir turlü
bulamadım::: kullanıcı ismim sihirli55
Link on message: #2097024
ameska, on 10 June 2012 - 11:17 AM, said: slm hesabım kullanıcı ismimden dolayı gecici kapatılmış anlam
veremedigim 2-3 aydır kullanıyorum bir sorun yoktuda şimdi neden
böyle birsey oldu acaba...bide ne zaman acılır gerekirsede
kullanucı adımı nereden degiştirebilrim bir turlü
bulamadım::: kullanıcı ismim sihirli55vuque: Kullanıcı isimlerinde 55 kullanmak yasaktır.Hesabınız bu sebeple
kapatılmıştır.Support ile iletişime geçerseniz nick değişikliği
yapıp hesabınızı açarlar diye düşünüyorum.
Subject: D-Day ― Phase One
Link on message: #2096848
BlakesBully, on 04 June 2012 - 12:59 PM, said: Punxerkampfwagen - you didn´t know that? 
Btw I want dicounts on Equipment. Long time since there last was one.
Link on message: #2096848
BlakesBully, on 04 June 2012 - 12:59 PM, said: Punxerkampfwagen - you didn´t know that? Btw I want dicounts on Equipment. Long time since there last was one.
supercharge:
uppps! We will change it asap
Thanks a lot!
uppps! We will change it asap
Thanks a lot!
Subject: D-Day ― Phase Two
Link on message: #2096566
Plasma_Fire, on 08 June 2012 - 05:57 PM, said: I notice that most of the German tanks that where in the D-Day
landings are not in the special...
The Tiger, JagdPanther are two prime examples of yet another lack on the WG team.
The only German tanks in the special are those that WG dont make any money from because they make credits even for Free2Play players.
Link on message: #2096566
Plasma_Fire, on 08 June 2012 - 05:57 PM, said: I notice that most of the German tanks that where in the D-Day
landings are not in the special...The Tiger, JagdPanther are two prime examples of yet another lack on the WG team.
The only German tanks in the special are those that WG dont make any money from because they make credits even for Free2Play players.
supercharge:
but in D-Day Phase One there was a 50% discount on JagdPanther
but in D-Day Phase One there was a 50% discount on JagdPanther
Subject: D-Day ― Phase Two
Link on message: #2096496
BogdanSchnee, on 07 June 2012 - 04:34 PM, said: why not jagdpanther x2 
Link on message: #2096496
BogdanSchnee, on 07 June 2012 - 04:34 PM, said: why not jagdpanther x2 supercharge:
sorry but we can't please everyone even though we're doing our best
sorry but we can't please everyone even though we're doing our best
Subject: New interview of Wargaming.net CEO
Link on message: #2096091
IanLuxor, on 10 June 2012 - 11:06 AM, said: 10 minutes a game x 25 games = 250 minutes = 4 hours and 10
minutes.
Seems very possible even if you are employed.
Link on message: #2096091
IanLuxor, on 10 June 2012 - 11:06 AM, said: 10 minutes a game x 25 games = 250 minutes = 4 hours and 10
minutes.Seems very possible even if you are employed.
LiannaSilverwind: Do not forget survival ratio of "average" player. If he/she does
not watch the battle til the very end, usual battle is more like 5
minutes for our "average" player, I suppose.
Subject: Где больше аленей, на ру или на евро?
Link on message: #2095897
ART_MEDIUM, on 10 June 2012 - 10:06 AM, said: А Вы здесь внятно сможете объяснить, какой этому "нубу" смысл
тащить бой в одиночестве? Ради чего он должен это делать?
Link on message: #2095897
ART_MEDIUM, on 10 June 2012 - 10:06 AM, said: А Вы здесь внятно сможете объяснить, какой этому "нубу" смысл
тащить бой в одиночестве? Ради чего он должен это делать?OldFox: Голый расчет:
1. За победу больше кредитов.
2. За победу больше опыта.
3. При победе лучше статистика.
4. От победы больше удовольствия.
Да и вообще проигрывать как-то не алле.
1. За победу больше кредитов.
2. За победу больше опыта.
3. При победе лучше статистика.
4. От победы больше удовольствия.
Да и вообще проигрывать как-то не алле.
Subject: par 7.4 public beta
Link on message: #2095680
Link on message: #2095680
OldFox: Lietotajam Skorpions_Lv par offtopu, politiskam spekulacijam un
kaiminvalstu valdibas apvainosanu ir ieslegts rezims RO uz 1 dienu.
Ludzu visus lietotajus attureties no modernas politikas
apspriesanas saja foruma. Topiks ir par paca 0.7.4. testu, ludzu
tureties pie ta.
Subject: The Best Tanks of WW2
Link on message: #2092786
Link on message: #2092786
LiannaSilverwind: Can you please specify which parametres should we use considering
our vote for The Best Tank?
For example:
1) Tank must have excellent armor to withstand enemy fire.
2) Tank must have excellent cannon/optics to be able to destroy enemy tanks at range.
3) Tank must have good mobility and speed on road and off-road.
4) Tank must be able to move long distances, cross bridges, be able to be transported via railroad etc.
5) Tank must be cheap enough to be produced in enough quantity to ensure absolute superiority on the battlefield.
6) Tank must be universal in order to fight both armoored vehicles and infantry.
7) Tank must provide maximum comfort for the crew.
8) Tank must be mechanically reliable in all weather conditions.
There is great difference between ideal tank for duels at open field or ideal tank for crossing vast distances or ideal tank for breaking through defensive lines or ideal tank for winning the war...
Before casting the vote, I suggest to imagine the following:
WHAT IF
1) Germans would not produce Pz IV, Tigers & Panthers but produce Shermans?
2) Germans would not produce Pz IV, Tigers & Panthers but produce T-34, KV and IS?
3) Soviets would not produce T-34, KV and IS, but Pz IV, Tigers and Panthers?
4) Soviets would not produce T-34, KV and IS, but Shermans?
5) US would not produce Shermans, but Pz IV, Tigers and Panthers?
6) US would not produce Shermans, but T-34, KV and IS?
Would such production links ensure victory in the war for their country? If yes, you have probably chosen the tank you consider being the best.
For example:
1) Tank must have excellent armor to withstand enemy fire.
2) Tank must have excellent cannon/optics to be able to destroy enemy tanks at range.
3) Tank must have good mobility and speed on road and off-road.
4) Tank must be able to move long distances, cross bridges, be able to be transported via railroad etc.
5) Tank must be cheap enough to be produced in enough quantity to ensure absolute superiority on the battlefield.
6) Tank must be universal in order to fight both armoored vehicles and infantry.
7) Tank must provide maximum comfort for the crew.
8) Tank must be mechanically reliable in all weather conditions.
There is great difference between ideal tank for duels at open field or ideal tank for crossing vast distances or ideal tank for breaking through defensive lines or ideal tank for winning the war...
Before casting the vote, I suggest to imagine the following:
WHAT IF
1) Germans would not produce Pz IV, Tigers & Panthers but produce Shermans?
2) Germans would not produce Pz IV, Tigers & Panthers but produce T-34, KV and IS?
3) Soviets would not produce T-34, KV and IS, but Pz IV, Tigers and Panthers?
4) Soviets would not produce T-34, KV and IS, but Shermans?
5) US would not produce Shermans, but Pz IV, Tigers and Panthers?
6) US would not produce Shermans, but T-34, KV and IS?
Would such production links ensure victory in the war for their country? If yes, you have probably chosen the tank you consider being the best.
Subject: Интерестно? Прочитай! Обсудим или "взвоем плачем"?
Link on message: #2092202
OldFox, on 07 June 2012 - 09:45 AM, said: Думаю, как только патч 0.7.4. станет на ЕУ-сервер, сразу будет в
каждом бою по 5-6 арт-САУ. Потом пройдет месяц, соберем статистику,
порежем арт-САУ, и все будет хорошо.
Link on message: #2092202
OldFox, on 07 June 2012 - 09:45 AM, said: Думаю, как только патч 0.7.4. станет на ЕУ-сервер, сразу будет в
каждом бою по 5-6 арт-САУ. Потом пройдет месяц, соберем статистику,
порежем арт-САУ, и все будет хорошо.LiannaSilverwind: Предполагаю подобное развитие ситуации. Добавлю только:
одновременно с рэзанием арты/пт введем новые имба танки, чтобы
пользователям было, чем заняться. 
Subject: New Efficiency Rating formula
Link on message: #2089215
Link on message: #2089215
LiannaSilverwind: Author has mentioned that he took everyone's comments to his heart
and considering 7.4 patch new game modes will think about new
formula values again. After that, he fell silent.
Subject: Conspiracy Theory: the reason of (not only) E-series nerf
Link on message: #2089096
Expandeux, on 08 June 2012 - 07:12 PM, said: You are using silver consumable while the gold one provides that
bonus ...
Link on message: #2089096
Expandeux, on 08 June 2012 - 07:12 PM, said: You are using silver consumable while the gold one provides that
bonus ...LiannaSilverwind: Exactly.
On test server I use the same consumables as on main one, to not get too relaxed. Paid for the experience.
On test server I use the same consumables as on main one, to not get too relaxed. Paid for the experience.
Subject: Comic contest
Link on message: #2088720
Link on message: #2088720
supercharge: Hi All,
The list of top comics for each language will be published on Mon.
Then you will have a few days to vote for the best one.
Thanks so much for taking part in the contest!
The list of top comics for each language will be published on Mon.
Then you will have a few days to vote for the best one.
Thanks so much for taking part in the contest!
Subject: Conspiracy Theory: the reason of (not only) E-series nerf
Link on message: #2088699
Quote Changed operation of Large First Aid Kit: a constant bonus of "+5% to avoiding critical damage to crew" will now be applied until the end of the battle, even once the First Aid Kit has been used.
Link on message: #2088699
Quote Changed operation of Large First Aid Kit: a constant bonus of "+5% to avoiding critical damage to crew" will now be applied until the end of the battle, even once the First Aid Kit has been used.
Subject: Conspiracy Theory: the reason of (not only) E-series nerf
Link on message: #2088694
Quote Changed operation of Large First Aid Kit: a constant bonus of "+5% to avoiding critical damage to crew" will now be applied until the end of the battle, even once the First Aid Kit has been used.
Link on message: #2088694
Quote Changed operation of Large First Aid Kit: a constant bonus of "+5% to avoiding critical damage to crew" will now be applied until the end of the battle, even once the First Aid Kit has been used.
LiannaSilverwind:
Subject: Tier I in charge
Link on message: #2088031
Link on message: #2088031
supercharge: HI All,
The list of winners will be posted on Monday!
The list of winners will be posted on Monday!
Subject: Русификация 7.3
Link on message: #2085143
Link on message: #2085143
OldFox: Кстати, русский язык на ЕУ-клиенте самолетиков встроен по дефолту.
Subject: Начался паблик тест 7.4
Link on message: #2084286
Link on message: #2084286
LiannaSilverwind: Большинство танководов на тесте/РУ-форуме ИС-6 очень ругает.
Дорогой, броня не очень, пушка не очень, нипанагибать.
Арту уже режут. Отняли топовые моторы у двух Лоррейн-арт. Ололосветить и ололоптшить стало немного труднее.
Арту уже режут. Отняли топовые моторы у двух Лоррейн-арт. Ололосветить и ололоптшить стало немного труднее.
Subject: Начался паблик тест 7.4
Link on message: #2082825
Link on message: #2082825
OldFox: В моих словах нет официальной позиции, это только подозрения.
Subject: Начался паблик тест 7.4
Link on message: #2082694
Link on message: #2082694
OldFox: На самом деле все уже ясно: надо покупать ИС-6 и качать французскую
арту. И чем быстрее, тем лучше, потому что потом арту опять
порежут.
Subject: Twitter Quiz #19
Link on message: #2082646
Grinelwald, on 07 June 2012 - 01:26 PM, said: I see only who responded, not exact time. I still didn't get answer
how winners are chosen?
Link on message: #2082646
Grinelwald, on 07 June 2012 - 01:26 PM, said: I see only who responded, not exact time. I still didn't get answer
how winners are chosen?supercharge: Hi,
As always, 2 correct answers per question will be chosen for 500 gold.
The first correct answer and one random correct reply.
Cheers,
Supercharge
As always, 2 correct answers per question will be chosen for 500 gold.
The first correct answer and one random correct reply.
Cheers,
Supercharge
Subject: Twitter Quiz #19
Link on message: #2082627
freggelz, on 07 June 2012 - 10:53 AM, said: And I'm one of them. Hell yeah! :D
Link on message: #2082627
freggelz, on 07 June 2012 - 10:53 AM, said: And I'm one of them. Hell yeah! :Dsupercharge: Congrats! 
Subject: World of Tanks Mobile Assistant
Link on message: #2082223
Link on message: #2082223
supercharge: World of Tanks Assistant
is available for both iPhone and Android and allows you to keep up
to date with the game whilst you are on the move
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2081897
Listy, on 07 June 2012 - 05:09 PM, said: Thanks overlord, that's going to make allot of people happy.
And the obligatory question:
133mm Gun? Who? What? Where?
I said ealier the closest I've been able to find to that calibre is the 1980's 140mm development, which didn't go anywhere. What is the basis for this gun? Or is it a balance propelled fictional weapon?
Thanks.
Link on message: #2081897
Listy, on 07 June 2012 - 05:09 PM, said: Thanks overlord, that's going to make allot of people happy.And the obligatory question:
133mm Gun? Who? What? Where?
I said ealier the closest I've been able to find to that calibre is the 1980's 140mm development, which didn't go anywhere. What is the basis for this gun? Or is it a balance propelled fictional weapon?
Thanks.
Overlord: Some naval stuff prolly.
Subject: Начался паблик тест 7.4
Link on message: #2081591
Link on message: #2081591
LiannaSilverwind: Тест продолжается фазой два. Запускаем launcher, стягиваем примочки
и вперед!
Subject: Why don't you buff AMX 40 instead of the T-28?
Link on message: #2081547
Quote Бронирование танка Т-28 возвращено к параметрам версии 0.7.3.
Link on message: #2081547
Quote Бронирование танка Т-28 возвращено к параметрам версии 0.7.3.
LiannaSilverwind: Translation: T-28 armor values returned to those of 0.7.3.
Subject: do we need this buff?
Link on message: #2081544
Quote Бронирование танка Т-28 возвращено к параметрам версии 0.7.3.
Link on message: #2081544
Quote Бронирование танка Т-28 возвращено к параметрам версии 0.7.3.
LiannaSilverwind: Translation: T-28 armor values returned to those of 0.7.3.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2081397
Listy, on 07 June 2012 - 03:50 PM, said: So you're saying its highly likely we will get the FV4005 with the
huge gun?
I was just asking as the lack of that gun on the FV215b had made me wonder if you'd decided to remove the gun for balance reasons?
Thanks.
Link on message: #2081397
Listy, on 07 June 2012 - 03:50 PM, said: So you're saying its highly likely we will get the FV4005 with the
huge gun?I was just asking as the lack of that gun on the FV215b had made me wonder if you'd decided to remove the gun for balance reasons?
Thanks.
Overlord: For the tank line we are thinking of 133mm gun as top, while for TD
line 183mm is quite enough.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2081117
Listy, on 07 June 2012 - 03:37 PM, said: Overlord, I think you've made a boob there.
Maus was always planned to mount a 150mm AT gun. However the production was delayed significantly so the well known 128mm +75mm mount was fitted to the turret for testing reasons.
And please hurry up with the multi-gun support.. I want to play a T-35.
Anyway a Question to prevent my ass getting banned again.
On the British tech tree, you have the FV215b as tier 10. This seems to be armed with a 130mm weapon.
In real life the FV215b was armed with a 183mm weapon, and the closest I can find to a British 130mm was a 140mm development in the 80's.
So what's going on? Will we get the 183mm? Is WG.Net inventing guns again (Note: I'm ok with this, just want to know)?
Equally what's going to be Tier 9 TD for the Brits? The obvious candidate was the FV4005 stage 2, but that also had the 183mm, and without it it's going to be alarmingly weak.
Link on message: #2081117
Listy, on 07 June 2012 - 03:37 PM, said: Overlord, I think you've made a boob there.Maus was always planned to mount a 150mm AT gun. However the production was delayed significantly so the well known 128mm +75mm mount was fitted to the turret for testing reasons.
And please hurry up with the multi-gun support.. I want to play a T-35.
Anyway a Question to prevent my ass getting banned again.
On the British tech tree, you have the FV215b as tier 10. This seems to be armed with a 130mm weapon.
In real life the FV215b was armed with a 183mm weapon, and the closest I can find to a British 130mm was a 140mm development in the 80's.
So what's going on? Will we get the 183mm? Is WG.Net inventing guns again (Note: I'm ok with this, just want to know)?
Equally what's going to be Tier 9 TD for the Brits? The obvious candidate was the FV4005 stage 2, but that also had the 183mm, and without it it's going to be alarmingly weak.
Overlord: So what? Let it be 183mm, either way E-100 TD will get a big one
too.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2080977
Ast3lan, on 07 June 2012 - 03:15 PM, said: Overlord, E75 problems and discussions apart...
One small question / suggestion regarding your use of multiple guns...
Couldn't you guys enable multiple cannons in tanks like the B1 or Lee based on the ammo slot change for ex?
You could have the howtizer on the B1 working or the turret cannon but you would only be able to select one at the time.
And in the future some new game mode, like in Unreal there was a mode called domination were you had to hold an area of the map, or more then one and the team to reach max cap first would win.
Now we could do this with tanks in randoms allowing the teams to hold a given position for some time before proceeding to the next, the team with most held points would gather more Cap points faster and win with 100 ( for ex ) cap points .
You could use the same reset mechanics, like enemy at cap point damaged , for the counters to start...
Btw, any news on when the British are indeed coming?
Thx.
Link on message: #2080977
Ast3lan, on 07 June 2012 - 03:15 PM, said: Overlord, E75 problems and discussions apart...One small question / suggestion regarding your use of multiple guns...
Couldn't you guys enable multiple cannons in tanks like the B1 or Lee based on the ammo slot change for ex?
You could have the howtizer on the B1 working or the turret cannon but you would only be able to select one at the time.
And in the future some new game mode, like in Unreal there was a mode called domination were you had to hold an area of the map, or more then one and the team to reach max cap first would win.
Now we could do this with tanks in randoms allowing the teams to hold a given position for some time before proceeding to the next, the team with most held points would gather more Cap points faster and win with 100 ( for ex ) cap points .
You could use the same reset mechanics, like enemy at cap point damaged , for the counters to start...
Btw, any news on when the British are indeed coming?
Thx.
Overlord: 1. Multi-gun support is in medium-range plans, there is some
difficulty with it.
2. Brits are coming, mate.
2. Brits are coming, mate.
Subject: D-Day Contest
Link on message: #2080749
The_Pwner, on 06 June 2012 - 01:48 PM, said: supercharge, 4000 doubled is better than 3000 undoubled?
Link on message: #2080749
The_Pwner, on 06 June 2012 - 01:48 PM, said: supercharge, 4000 doubled is better than 3000 undoubled?supercharge:
Yes, that's correct - final experience counts the most.
Yes, that's correct - final experience counts the most.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2080747
ares354, on 07 June 2012 - 02:22 PM, said:
http://imageshack.us...anie0001rj.jpg/
Link on message: #2080747
ares354, on 07 June 2012 - 02:22 PM, said: http://imageshack.us...anie0001rj.jpg/
Overlord: Maus with 150mm, if my Polish is good enough?
Nope, not planning to enable it for
this vehicle.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2080606
Snortsch, on 07 June 2012 - 04:55 AM, said: Because only like 4% are playing in Clan Wars. It may sound harsh,
but
the balancing has to be tailored to suit these random battles, because
they are more important, for the big (actually really big) majority.
How often do you drive a tier 4 tank there...or tier 6? They have to balance all tiers, not only tier nine and ten.
Yep, moderator, please let everybody see how tough he is, using tough words...
Link on message: #2080606
Snortsch, on 07 June 2012 - 04:55 AM, said: Because only like 4% are playing in Clan Wars. It may sound harsh,
butthe balancing has to be tailored to suit these random battles, because
they are more important, for the big (actually really big) majority.
How often do you drive a tier 4 tank there...or tier 6? They have to balance all tiers, not only tier nine and ten.
Yep, moderator, please let everybody see how tough he is, using tough words...
Overlord: * Signing what he said.*
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2080602
Perscienter, on 07 June 2012 - 03:19 AM, said: This is a Q&A topic.
Can you confirm that damage and penetration values are normally distributed?
Link on message: #2080602
Perscienter, on 07 June 2012 - 03:19 AM, said: This is a Q&A topic.Can you confirm that damage and penetration values are normally distributed?
Overlord: Yes.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2080593
nerderklaus, on 06 June 2012 - 10:45 PM, said: @Overlord: Why do you even bother with the random battle stats?
They mean nothing, because the majority of players does more things
completely wrong than right there. Meaning as soon as the
difficulty of something gets above very easy the random battle
stats get unreliable (see players being too bad to use IS-7 which
is the most overpowered tank). Instead you should only go for
statistics based upon performances of high quality (=minimal amount
of mistakes) like the final battles for key provinces or real
tournaments. The performances and choices of such players give you
a much much more accurate and reliable feedback about balancing
things than anything from random battles could ever do. The name
random battle itself is most adequate, because everything there is
random.
Just do statistics for final fights of key provinces and tournaments with restricted access (invitational or requiring qualification). Only these give you reliable data, because the randoms only depend on one team having more randomly assigned badies who make their useful players lose.
Seriously why are you fucking up like this? If WG would do the job properly this game would have the potencial to kill League of Legends easily, but instead you offend players and do your balancing things in a way that a lot of players will leave this game and not recommend it. Mod leave the profanity here...
Link on message: #2080593
nerderklaus, on 06 June 2012 - 10:45 PM, said: @Overlord: Why do you even bother with the random battle stats?
They mean nothing, because the majority of players does more things
completely wrong than right there. Meaning as soon as the
difficulty of something gets above very easy the random battle
stats get unreliable (see players being too bad to use IS-7 which
is the most overpowered tank). Instead you should only go for
statistics based upon performances of high quality (=minimal amount
of mistakes) like the final battles for key provinces or real
tournaments. The performances and choices of such players give you
a much much more accurate and reliable feedback about balancing
things than anything from random battles could ever do. The name
random battle itself is most adequate, because everything there is
random.Just do statistics for final fights of key provinces and tournaments with restricted access (invitational or requiring qualification). Only these give you reliable data, because the randoms only depend on one team having more randomly assigned badies who make their useful players lose.
Seriously why are you fucking up like this? If WG would do the job properly this game would have the potencial to kill League of Legends easily, but instead you offend players and do your balancing things in a way that a lot of players will leave this game and not recommend it. Mod leave the profanity here...
Overlord: The random is the most playable game mode which is clear, it's the
basis of the entire game. We can't but tailor tanks particularly to
it. CW are secondary to it.
Subject: EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #2080580
JagdWehrwolf, on 06 June 2012 - 09:29 PM, said: Right...
A lot seems to be happening regarding the transmission-gate ™, but it's getting a bit confusing now. Overlord, You asked us to await the official statement and it is unclear whether the note on Your blog can be treated as such (Your request has been posted at 1.44PM and Blog note has a time of posting at 12.45PM, though in both cases I can't establish the timezone). Could You please clarify?
If it is, more to follow.
But regardless I would like to thank You for expressing at least a bit of interest, unlike SerB or Storm who don't even bother to stand up to criticism in person.
Link on message: #2080580
JagdWehrwolf, on 06 June 2012 - 09:29 PM, said: Right...A lot seems to be happening regarding the transmission-gate ™, but it's getting a bit confusing now. Overlord, You asked us to await the official statement and it is unclear whether the note on Your blog can be treated as such (Your request has been posted at 1.44PM and Blog note has a time of posting at 12.45PM, though in both cases I can't establish the timezone). Could You please clarify?
If it is, more to follow.
But regardless I would like to thank You for expressing at least a bit of interest, unlike SerB or Storm who don't even bother to stand up to criticism in person.
Overlord: My time zone is GMT/UTC+2 (Minsk time). The official statement is
yet to arrive. Didn't mean the blog post.
Реклама | Adv
















