Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: L'Étape 2 de Mission de reconnaissance est disponible !
Link on message: #18724049
Darth_33, on 12 September 2021 - 09:23 AM, said:
Ne serait-ce pas le but du serveur test , de tester les nouveaux char ? (entre autre ) Petite aparté , le mode est indisponible sur les deux serveurs ? BUG ?
Link on message: #18724049

Ne serait-ce pas le but du serveur test , de tester les nouveaux char ? (entre autre ) Petite aparté , le mode est indisponible sur les deux serveurs ? BUG ?
Actinid:
Le pourcentage de joueurs allant sur le supertest est relativement faible comparé à ceux essayent la mission de reconnaissance. Avoir une fonctionalité pour tester des chars (quitte à ce que ce soit en nombre limité, sur un mode de jeu à part) peu être intéressante =).
Le pourcentage de joueurs allant sur le supertest est relativement faible comparé à ceux essayent la mission de reconnaissance. Avoir une fonctionalité pour tester des chars (quitte à ce que ce soit en nombre limité, sur un mode de jeu à part) peu être intéressante =).
Subject: Představujeme 17. sezónu na globální mapě
Link on message: #18724014
BlackPrince1_StronKuDucK, on 13 September 2021 - 04:45 PM, said: Problém s překladem odměn v sekci Fronta X. úrovně. Asi si někdo
při překladu spletl vodu s ohněm.
Link on message: #18724014



Sstyx:
Děkuji za nahlášení.Pro
příště tě poprosím využívat spoileru, aby obrázky nezabírali celé
vlákno, děkuji.

Subject: 5. kolo Tankových válek: Speciál Tankfest se stroji M4A3E8 Fury a Tiger 131
Link on message: #18723905
zuu_2016, on 13 September 2021 - 03:19 PM, said: Dostupné od 13. září, 07:00 CEST (UTC+2), do 20. září, 07:00 CEST
(UTC+2), na všech zúčastněných kanálech ve službě Twitch s
aktivními dropy. Hahaha, kde jsou ty dropy?
Link on message: #18723905

Sstyx: To nač odkazuješ, je začátek akce, nikoli dropy. Dropy mají
rozdílná data:"Dostupné od 17. září, 07:00 CEST (UTC+2), do 20.
září, 07:00 CEST (UTC+2), na všech zúčastněných kanálech ve službě
Twitch s aktivními dropy."
Subject: Holt das Beste aus dem Sommer heraus mit Prime Gaming!
Link on message: #18721159
Horny_Hans, on 09 September 2021 - 09:55 AM, said: Wofür sollte ich das holen? Ich fahre keine Mietpanzer (so wie
Abrik das sagte, sehe ich das auch), daher kann ich nicht mal mehr
die Auträge dazu erfüllen. Und was gibts dann sonst noch? Eine
tolle Medaille (ganz ernsthaft, aber wer will sowas? Noch dazu eine
Medaille wofür? Für das, dass ich nicht zu behindert war, um mich
auf einer Website einzuloggen????) und einen Stil, der leider
lieblos hingewich... (ach darf ich ja nicht mehr sagen..)
hingeworfen wurde; Da
DeGekko, on 09 September 2021 - 10:09 AM, said: Es muss keineswegs ein zweites Set enthalten sein,
einfach streichen und gut ist! Aber das eine Set an Aufträgen nur
noch mit den 4 Mietpanzern absolvieren zu können ist Blödsinn,
besonders im Hinblick auf die Crex XP mal 2 Aufträge, welche man
jeden Tag 10mal bekommen hat. Da konnte man schön die Crew einer
Linie die man gerade grindet boosten. Jetzt kann man das nur noch
mit den 4 Premiumtanks! Premiumtanks haben von Haus aus schon sehr
gute Crews, also warum diese noch extra boosten?
Geno1isme, on 09 September 2021 - 10:45 AM, said: Ich hatte ja seinerzeit die Hoffnung dass das System des
CW-Reward-Shops auch auf andere Bereiche ausgedehnt wird, man also
angesammelte Punkte aus mehreren Events gegen Belohnungen tauschen
kann die man sich aus einem gewissen Pool selbst aussucht. Hätte
für uns den Vorteil dass wir weniger nutzlosen Kram ansammeln
und für euch dass ihr euch nicht bei jedem Popel-Event
überlegen müsst was es denn diesmal an Belohnungen gibt.
Schwerthelm, on 09 September 2021 - 11:26 AM, said: Bin Meckerer und bedanke mich für nix!
Link on message: #18721159

Zapfhan: Es gab bisher so viele verschiedene Pakete mit mal mehr mal
weniger Inhalten. Jedesmal wird wieder so getan als sein das
der Untergang von irgendwas.Es wird von manchen noch immer nicht
verstanden, dass das ganze eine Dreingabe ist. Wenn du keine
Mietpanzer fährst ist das doch deine Sache daran bist du ja am Ende
selber schuld, wenn du den Punkt, der die Pakete für Viele
interessant machst halt gar nicht nutzen willst.Die Medaille gibt
es als "Abzeichen" wie halt fast immer. Oh und der Stil trifft
deinen Geschmack nicht? Ist halt wie alles
Geschmackssache.

Zapfhan: Du vergisst dabei halt komplett über deinen Tellerrand zu
schauen und zu sehen, dass viele Spieler eben noch keine guten
Crews haben und gerade die Mietpanzer auch dafür nutzen ihre Crews
nach oben zu ziehen.

Zapfhan: Klingt zwar schön aber sowas umzustellen während etwas läuft
ist mit unnötigem Aufwand verbunden besonders, wenn Partner
involviert sind.

Zapfhan: 

Subject: Verpasst den Clan Super Cup am Sonntag nicht
Link on message: #18721147
McNiell, on 10 September 2021 - 02:03 PM, said: wer bekommt eigentlich die kohle? wird die unter den spielern die
angetreten sind verteilt oder an jeden im clan?
Link on message: #18721147

Zapfhan: Die Gewinner werden in der Regel innerhalb der Teams
aufgeteilt.
Subject: Die Neue Saison der gewerteten Gefechte 2021–2022 beginnt!
Link on message: #18721134
Nemii29, on 10 September 2021 - 02:50 PM, said: Auch verstehe ich nicht die Kombi von Sniper Panzern, die
für Spots EXP bekommen, macht für mich keinen Sinn.
Link on message: #18721134

Zapfhan: Weil die Rolle eben nicht nur Eindimensional ist.Wie du
wissen solltest ist der Leo ja mobil und hat mit dem 410m Base
Sichtweite einen Wert der es ihm auf Karten erlaubt auch die
Spots zu liefern. Es entspricht also seiner Rolle.
Subject: Die Neue Saison der gewerteten Gefechte 2021–2022 beginnt!
Link on message: #18721110
Vopomat, on 10 September 2021 - 02:32 PM, said: Was verstehst du nicht daran, dass man die Rolle auf Ensk
gar nicht ausfüllen kann? Habe ich wirklich so unverständlich
geschrieben? Auf Sachverhalte muss man übrigens nicht immer
zwingend ausweichend reagieren...
Link on message: #18721110

Zapfhan: Und auf anderen Karten können andere Panzer ihre Rolle nicht
so gut ausfüllen. Das "Risiko" die Karte zu bekommen ist ja
bekannt
Subject: Die Neue Saison der gewerteten Gefechte 2021–2022 beginnt!
Link on message: #18721089
Vopomat, on 10 September 2021 - 01:36 PM, said: Was passiert, wenn man im Leo auf Ensk Topdamage und zwei
Kills macht? Genau, weil man die Fahrzeugrolle nicht
ausfüllt, bekommt man nur einen Streifen. Dabei ist es auf Ensk
praktisch unmöglich Schaden über 300m zu machen. Ist das
WG-Logik oder muss man das noch tiefer ansetzen?
Link on message: #18721089

Zapfhan: Also die Rolle des Panzers und die verschiedenen zu
speilenden Karten sind bekannt, was daran versteht man nun
nicht?
Subject: WoT heading full speed in the same wall as WoW
Link on message: #18720989
dibbdroid, on 09 September 2021 - 06:44 PM, said: Considering you are meant to be WG staff and a
community manager you're evidently a condascending narcissist and
everything wrong with WG's attitude toward customers. The author of
this post has raised some reasonable points and then gets this sort
of RESPECT. Yeah, your ego has not played well with others.
Unprofessional. The majority feeling on SCrew 2.0 is it
sucks, you gave up answering on the forum because of the
negativity. The overwhelming feedback from the community is a no
but the WG blindness wins out, same as the HE changes. Chat
is toxic, open your eyes. The responses to this guy's , and many
others' response shows the level of toxicity and solipsism in the
WG community The real crux of the matter is gameplay itself
has decended into chaos, too many 5 minute or less battles. You sit
in a run of 100 or more battles with 90% scoreline of 15-5 or worse
(and the reverse) and 80% as bottom tier and try to have a positive
comment at World of Tanks and Wargaming. Or carry on being
discourteous to your customers and see how that works out in the
longterm.
lemanrussdemolisher, on 09 September 2021 - 07:32 PM, said: I think that what he means to say is that they have not
binned the screw 2.0 but pushed it back by +/-6 months which can
still forbear them trying still force it down on people once the
WoW shitstorm will have passed. So no it's not yet
implemented; hopefully it will never be, with more luck they will
keep the handful of useful ideas and dump the rest in the toilets
where it belongs and flush it. 19:34 Added after 2 minute
stormermp, on 09 September 2021 - 10:45 PM, said: Nah it's just plain 'ole WG mocking it's player base that still
cares and plays this game.As seen in what lenghts they regard their
customers already in WoWs community.That's falling apart along with
the game
Downie, on 09 September 2021 - 11:22 PM, said: "A good clan using S.Conqs will still very much likely beat a not
as good clan using chieftains, how much the tank makes a difference
usually only becomes a thing in the top 0.1% or so. And in terms of
the rest of this, it's like saying that you entered into a 100m
race and when everyone else finished you were at 80m's, so it would
be only fair that we let you start there next time... No. This is a
thing to reward the high level of play, if you don't win then you
don't win. It's that simple, it isn't meant to be for everyone.
Anyone can enter/be involved but that doesn't stop some skill being
required to get the rewards. And as already said, if you want
to buy stuff in the auction save up and do so, no one is
stopping you. " WG STAFF QUOTE The quote from the WG staff
proves how detached wargaming are a good clan will beat a clan
thats not so good with super conquerors are you actually
kidding? The not so good clan wont be able to field 100%
Chieftens or 279 or any of the other OP tanks and the good clan are
not going to use S Conqs in the game but only use the OP tanks and
spam gold. The point of clans wars is about fair competition yet
you allow broken vehicles into the mix why isnt all clan on clan
action simply tech tree tanks only would save all the problems and
allow FAIR competiton. I really laugh at your skill
comment why dont you publish the list of cheaters on the EU server
so we can see where the skill lies. You are doing nothing
for community relations with the save up comment but more and more
now its harder for players to earn any money specialy the free to
play guys out there because of the changes you constantly
make. And your 100m analogy is simply not related to what the
guys saying at all. How about instead of trying to be
sacarstic to a player whos taken the time to write down a detailed
opinion for you you start to collate the opinions of people on the
forums and take them to your overlords. WG is in
trouble with Warships, Your in trouble with several countries and
now your trying to alienate you customers further with these stupid
and rather patronising replies. Here another genius quote
frrom the new guy try to boost PR MM +/-1 no more, people
will wait if this means nicer games and funnier game "If this was
entirely the case then people would near exclusively play pref mm
tanks. I personally think the MM is in the best state it has ever
been, but we can always improve it and we know that it's a heavily
highlighted area of feedback, so we are sure to pass this on "
I would love to play my pref match making tanks constantly
getting +1-1 matchmaking as that is the premise the vehicles were
sold under however your broken match maker constantly puts them at
+2. Let me make this really clear to you the MM is in its
worst state ever not its best if your so confident on that
statement send a poll out to the enitre player base with the
question "Is the MM working" I Dare you
Downie, on 10 September 2021 - 12:07 AM, said: Expand black list to 10k. It's badly needed, you are the ones
responsible for the aggressive atmosphere by creating op tanks to
an elite, unbalanced MM, pathetic RNG and idiotic map starting
position, when I started this game people would wish everyone luck,
Polish players would even say "Siema". Bringing that one back is
your responsibility by creating a fun environment, currently, it is
not the players fault it is yours entirely. I'm not even sure I
need to comment on this, the irony is too obvious. But I'll add
that when I first played WoT back in 2013/2014, in my first 100
battles I lost count of how often people wished horrible things on
me and my family all while being high win rate and purple (aka it
wasn't like I was playing bad), since joining WG in November 2020
and playing regularly again I haven't had anywhere near the abuse,
not even had any once actually (tempting fate lol), nevermind as
much as there was back then. So just as anecdotally as you, I can
say with some surety that the chat has never been friendlier...
This is sort of backed up too with people complaining how easily
they get banned in chat for saying things. Another gem from
the WG cheerleader section. I love the way you try to lblow
you own trumpet saying what a great player you are so people dont
abuse you so it must then be okay to abuse rubbish players
Have you considered its the fact you disabled chat to enemy team
because of this exact reason and are therefore only getting 50% of
the abuse? And the fact people might know you work for
wargaming and people might not be so keen to abuse you ?
lemanrussdemolisher, on 10 September 2021 - 12:18 AM, said:
This exactly why I have not even been bothered to answer his comments or that of his unicum buddy since they either answer from bits out of the context to serve their purpose, or mixing two of my comments to match their answer but therefore missing the point, I have better things to do than waste my time with them, I'm glad to see that the reactions of the normal players tend to lean towards my comments (of course with variation and modulations since we all have different game plays and preferences) and that the cry babies I mentioned in my first text stood like one man to try and demonstrate that what I said is untrue. Reading them, I'm obviously not playing the same game (but I remember it's just because I'm a bad players and so are everyone else I play with) and I wonder since we have reached the Nirvana in Tiers X how it comes that harmonious MM and tank balancing leads to games finishing with scores like 3/15, 1/15, 5/15 etc... (could that be me, being contagious and spreading my terrible gameplay to my doomed teammates?) I'm definitely not the best player, I'm certainly not the worst - well except in arty since I'm a mediocre arty player - as it has been decided by my peer Tajj7 (with only 17% of my arties below 50% win out of 37 played and 33 mastered if I'm mediocre I wonder what Tajj7 considers himself to be with his 12 arties 3 masters and 33% below 50% win) and I'm totally a team player and someone that wants to enjoy the richness of the game in both the vehicles types and the various tiers. So I repeat my plea to WG, make the games better balanced, make Clan Wars something that people want to play and not run away from, reward fidelity and involvement, stop insulting your vets
Aerialss, on 10 September 2021 - 07:59 AM, said: A good clan using S.Conqs will still very much likely beat a not as
good clan using chieftains, how much the tank makes a difference
usually only becomes a thing in the top 0.1% or so. And in terms of
the rest of this, it's like saying that you entered into a 100m
race and when everyone else finished you were at 80m's, so it would
be only fair that we let you start there next time... No. This is a
thing to reward the high level of play, if you don't win then you
don't win. It's that simple, it isn't meant to be for everyone.
Anyone can enter/be involved but that doesn't stop some
skill being required to get the rewards. And as already said, if
you want to buy stuff in the auction save up and do so, no one
is stopping you. Are you serious about that ? So the new
clans and players can face with S.Congs the chieftains ? And they
dont have any hope that thay can grind the chief for clan battles
beacouse its not anymore in rewards. So are the big clans can enjoy
the benefit off chief and all the poor players can get rapped when
the event is coming ? At least put back the chief for new clans to
give a hope to earn it and give them a porpouse to play the
competitive game. Clan Wars its not for everyone ? But the chief
and the 907 in random battles affects everyone ? Its sad that you
dont give a damn about new players and new clans , face chief with
s.conq its like saying play tier 8 agains tier 10 in clan wars if
you know what i mean. I disagree with may points of view with OP ,
but with clan wars and the chief erased from grind it was a big f.u
all new players , have fun with this great event , you are not
unicums so go f yourselfs from now , and you cant get the chief
from now , its bad you dont played the game back 4-5 years at least
you have the chance to get it.Good luck facing 6-7 with 6-7 S.Conq
in clan wars, they will overotate you with their med speed and even
hulldown they will outplayed you,
Link on message: #18720989

HeatResistantBFG:

HeatResistantBFG:


HeatResistantBFG:

HeatResistantBFG: "If this was entirely the case then people would near exclusively
play pref mm tanks. I personally think the MM is in the best state
it has ever been, but we can always improve it and we know that
it's a heavily highlighted area of feedback, so we are sure to pass
this on " I would love to play my pref match making tanks
constantly getting +1-1 matchmaking as that is the premise the
vehicles were sold under however your broken match maker constantly
puts them at +2. Let me make this really clear to you the MM
is in its worst state ever not its best if your so confident on
that statement send a poll out to the enitre player base with the
question "Is the MM working" I Dare you

HeatResistantBFG: I'm not even sure I need to comment on this, the irony is too
obvious. But I'll add that when I first played WoT back in
2013/2014, in my first 100 battles I lost count of how often people
wished horrible things on me and my family all while being high win
rate and purple (aka it wasn't like I was playing bad), since
joining WG in November 2020 and playing regularly again I haven't
had anywhere near the abuse, not even had any once actually
(tempting fate lol), nevermind as much as there was back then. So
just as anecdotally as you, I can say with some surety that the
chat has never been friendlier... This is sort of backed up too
with people complaining how easily they get banned in chat for
saying things. Another gem from the WG cheerleader section.
I love the way you try to lblow you own trumpet saying what
a great player you are so people dont abuse you so it must then be
okay to abuse rubbish players Have you considered its the
fact you disabled chat to enemy team because of this exact reason
and are therefore only getting 50% of the abuse? And the fact
people might know you work for wargaming and people might not be so
keen to abuse you ?

This exactly why I have not even been bothered to answer his comments or that of his unicum buddy since they either answer from bits out of the context to serve their purpose, or mixing two of my comments to match their answer but therefore missing the point, I have better things to do than waste my time with them, I'm glad to see that the reactions of the normal players tend to lean towards my comments (of course with variation and modulations since we all have different game plays and preferences) and that the cry babies I mentioned in my first text stood like one man to try and demonstrate that what I said is untrue. Reading them, I'm obviously not playing the same game (but I remember it's just because I'm a bad players and so are everyone else I play with) and I wonder since we have reached the Nirvana in Tiers X how it comes that harmonious MM and tank balancing leads to games finishing with scores like 3/15, 1/15, 5/15 etc... (could that be me, being contagious and spreading my terrible gameplay to my doomed teammates?) I'm definitely not the best player, I'm certainly not the worst - well except in arty since I'm a mediocre arty player - as it has been decided by my peer Tajj7 (with only 17% of my arties below 50% win out of 37 played and 33 mastered if I'm mediocre I wonder what Tajj7 considers himself to be with his 12 arties 3 masters and 33% below 50% win) and I'm totally a team player and someone that wants to enjoy the richness of the game in both the vehicles types and the various tiers. So I repeat my plea to WG, make the games better balanced, make Clan Wars something that people want to play and not run away from, reward fidelity and involvement, stop insulting your vets
HeatResistantBFG:

HeatResistantBFG: So, going to answer here to all of it as a lot of
repeated points. S.conq/comp point, so I will openly say I am
not experienced with PC Competitive scene, I watch it and have
watched it since the WGL era (met some of my now colleagues at
Moscow in London back in 2017 IIRC)... So I would indeed be foolish
to make a point with so little knowledge, except that wasn't my
point, I used the information given to me by people like thePhilX
+ ApolypticalSnowflake as well as other staff who take part it
comp and all the YouTubers and streamers within the CC and
wider community I talk to every day. And the point I made was based
on their far larger knowledge than my own, and I think it stands.
You are of course more than welcome to disagree, but tell me why
and don't just tell me I'm wrong or try to undermine my point by
attacking me. I didn't say it IS okay to send abuse to anyone,
I can see how the wording could have been better but my point with
my stats/ability of the time was merely that I wasn't being sent
abuse for being bad (as you can bet that someone would make that
claim if I didn't say it), I was being sent abuse because why not.
No sending of abuse is okay, and I spend enough time helping get
action taken against people sending abuse that to accuse me of
being pro abuse of anyone is farcical. But again it misses the main
point, it was stated that in their experience the game has got more
toxic, I was saying in mine it hasn't but that both points are
purely anecdotal and so there can be no surety on it either way.
And saying that with all chat turned off that 50% doesn't get
seen/sent is a damn good argument for why it got turned off. Oh,
and I run anonymiser and I highly doubt I'm known enough, I'm
no eek or ectar, and I don't have a WG tag in-game and actually,
the closest I have been to receiving abuse is because I work for
WG.. funnily enough. And professionalism, I'm not really sure
how you think the using of company made emotes on a company
forum to talk to players would be something to be fired over... I
took the time to go over every point they made and reply with
double-checked answers and present as close to the fact as is
possible to each one, I could have just ignored it and got on
with my day and not spent a portion of it making sure a player who
clearly isn't happy with things know that someone who is actually
involved is listening and that in several cases I acknowledged that
it is an area we are working on. So surely to dismiss everything I
said would be to disagree with yourselves? I conceded some points
and offered evidence/points contrary to some of those stated, but
simply stating "mean WeeGee guy should be fired" achieves
nothing. If my wording results in someone feeling insulted, mocked
etc or anything then please bring it to my attention and explain
how/why. It could be a simple misunderstanding or bad wording, but
it will never be my intent and I will always happily remedy or
explain any misunderstandings. Crew 2.0... I'm not really sure
how far irony can be stretched before it becomes an entirely
different thing, but bringing up "WG don't listen to feedback"
and "crew 2.0" as complimenting points simply defeats your own
arguments. How about I add some more, field mods had over 85%
positive feedback from EU players on sandbox (yeah, I was shocked
it was that high too), HE sandbox was 70% globally (yes that has
become a meme, doesn't stop it being real and true and was the
feedback from more than 140k people), Ammo Rework was dropped and
sent back to the drawing board due to player feedback, overmatch
rework was dropped and sent to cutting room floor... there are
probably more I can't immediately think of. WoT has a history of
testing things on the sandbox and if players dislike it, dropping
it or reworking it until they do... it depends on the feedback. As
people keep pointing out there is a lot of good in crew 2.0, but
those good aren't deemed worth the negatives by players and so our
job is to find a way to change those negatives until overall
players want the change... or drop it entirely because it's not
worth the dev time allocated. I'm happy to have
and for our players to have productive and critical conversations
about the game, but keep it constructive, show proof and keep it
civil, let's refrain from the name-calling and what are starting
to more than just blur the lines of being criticism or
insult. If this thread goes further down the uncivil discourse
path, at any speed, I or one of the mods will shut it down.
Thanks 

Subject: Tank Wars Round 5: Tankfest Special With the M4A3E8 Fury and Tiger 131
Link on message: #18720985
Truntea, on 10 September 2021 - 01:15 PM, said: You do know that they used to give points and consumables.
Just checking as you seem a little delirious about it.

Eroe_dell_Iride, on 10 September 2021 - 01:04 PM, said: Mmh, I really don't know which team choose. I have several tanks on
both lines.
Link on message: #18720985


Dwigt: That was the first episode (t34 vs Sherman). Since then Twitch
dropped points but we also increased the rewards and included
more valuable one
https://worldoftanks...1/#twitch-drops


Dwigt: Did you like the movie?Mediums or Heavies?Any lines you're
researching that include some of those tanks?Maybe that
will help
Subject: Späheinsatz: Abschnitt 2 ist da!
Link on message: #18720977
Nemii29, on 09 September 2021 - 02:25 PM, said:
Kann man die Karten denn aktuell schon im Übungsraum testen? Denn dann wäre ich voll bei dir. Dann kann man das feintesten dort machen
Ich hab mal grad geschaut, gefunden habe ich sie nicht.
@ Zapfhan Wäre es möglich diese Karten auch im Übungsraum zur
Verfügung zu stellen?
Commander_Isaak, on 10 September 2021 - 12:07 PM, said: Ob nun 10 oder 30 Karten unausgeglichen sind, macht ja 0
Unterschied. Man hätte alle alten Karten einfach drin lassen
sollen.
Link on message: #18720977

Kann man die Karten denn aktuell schon im Übungsraum testen? Denn dann wäre ich voll bei dir. Dann kann man das feintesten dort machen

Zapfhan: Technisch ist es denke ich schon möglich, es soll ja
aber der Modus zum generellen spielen verwendet werden.

Zapfhan: Ansichtssache
Subject: Tank Wars Round 5: Tankfest Special With the M4A3E8 Fury and Tiger 131
Link on message: #18720919
daveirich, on 10 September 2021 - 11:51 AM, said: I like this month's reiteration of Tank Wars, well definitely give
it a go with some of the German line soon to be TotT. Thank you.
Truntea, on 10 September 2021 - 10:33 AM, said: I still remember when they gave more than just points, those
were the good days.
Ze_Uber_Derper, on 10 September 2021 - 10:20 AM, said: Finally; good job.
Link on message: #18720919

Dwigt: So it will be team Tiger131
We were also blessed by another
nice and funny Ranzar video for this episode!


Dwigt: Well the drops depend on the event, for this one points will help
you progress and redeem more rewards.
Other events will have something different
Other events will have something different


Dwigt: Just like any Tank Wars event, the real question is, Tiger 131 or
M4 Fury?
Subject: L'Étape 2 de Mission de reconnaissance est disponible !
Link on message: #18720779
llaaaall, on 09 September 2021 - 05:22 PM, said: L'idée de tester les maps est très bonne. @actinid pourquoi
ne pas faire la même chose avec les futurs tank ? En plus ça peut
nous donner envie d'acheter
Link on message: #18720779

Actinid:
Bonne suggestion. Je la remonte.
Bonne suggestion. Je la remonte.
Subject: STRV K
Link on message: #18720778
Link on message: #18720778
Sstyx: Švédský prémiový těžký tank IX. úrovně. Více informací o
tanku v Tankpédii. Odkaz na tanks.gg - statistiky a 3D
model. Historické pozadí:V polovině 50. let koupilo
Švédsko od Spojeného království tanky Centurion Mk. 3. Zároveň v té
době rozvíjelo vlastní projekt KRV, když padlo rozhodnutí
zkombinovat připravené podvozky KRV s věží Centurion Mk. 10. Práce
na tomto vozidle probíhaly v červnu 1959. Ukázalo se však, že
výroba je příliš nákladná. Projekt byl přerušen a Švédsko
pokračovalo v nakupování britských vozidel.
Subject: Wierzchołek drzewa: Type 5 Heavy
Link on message: #18720559
BLEDNY_RYCERZ, on 06 September 2021 - 07:54 PM, said:
Tak właśnie ja robię ze względów kolekcjonerskich i ze względu na zniżkę 30%. pomyślałem że niech sobie stoi w garażu, może za parę lat dostanie buffa i znów będzie grywalny a ja nie będę musiał za niego płacić 6 baniek. No ale niestety gra 8 tierem może się skończyć terapią u psychologa. 7 tier odbijał więcej od ósemek niż ósemka. Siódemkę też dość często losowało na topce. Ósemkę inne ósemki przebijają bez golda jak chcą, ma za dużo wielgachnych week spotów. Do tego regularnie losuje mnie na dziewiątki i dziesiątki. odkąd się z nią męczę to jeszcze nie grałem na topce, a to działo to jest jakiś śmiech, trola nawet nie montowałem.
Link on message: #18720559

Tak właśnie ja robię ze względów kolekcjonerskich i ze względu na zniżkę 30%. pomyślałem że niech sobie stoi w garażu, może za parę lat dostanie buffa i znów będzie grywalny a ja nie będę musiał za niego płacić 6 baniek. No ale niestety gra 8 tierem może się skończyć terapią u psychologa. 7 tier odbijał więcej od ósemek niż ósemka. Siódemkę też dość często losowało na topce. Ósemkę inne ósemki przebijają bez golda jak chcą, ma za dużo wielgachnych week spotów. Do tego regularnie losuje mnie na dziewiątki i dziesiątki. odkąd się z nią męczę to jeszcze nie grałem na topce, a to działo to jest jakiś śmiech, trola nawet nie montowałem.
ApocalipticSnowflake: EDIT. Tematy mi się pomyliły. Type 5 HT kiedyś był metą.
Aktualnie jest dość dziwny do grania ze względu na wolne pociski
AP. Nie jest to łatwy czołg do grania ale dalej potrafi klepać
wyniki https://www.youtube....h?v=u8CoP-xPvR4
Jeżeli chodzi o O-Ho to on ma kilka punktów gdzie jesteś możliwy do przebicia. Ale nie nazwałbym "gdzie chcą". Jednak ten czołg ma trochę pancerza tylko trzeba go kątować.
Jeżeli chodzi o O-Ho to on ma kilka punktów gdzie jesteś możliwy do przebicia. Ale nie nazwałbym "gdzie chcą". Jednak ten czołg ma trochę pancerza tylko trzeba go kątować.
Subject: Przepustka bitewna: Sezon VI
Link on message: #18720555
M4RCIN77, on 08 September 2021 - 07:34 PM, said: Pomóżcie proszę, bo się zakręciłem - kupiłem za 99 zł z groszami
wszystkie trzy etapy ulepszonej przepustki a w garażu nadal jestem
na pierwszym etapie i nie widzę żadnych nagród. Chyba coś źle
przeczytałem, gdyż liczyłem, że po zakupie od razu zgarnę wszystkie
nagrody, zarówno podstawowe, jak i ulepszone, a tu nadal świeci "1"
etap. Jak to działa?
Link on message: #18720555

ApocalipticSnowflake: Kupując przepustkę odblokowujesz wyłącznie dolną ścieżkę
nagród.
Ale same poziomy trzeba odblokować samemu. poprzez granie
Ale same poziomy trzeba odblokować samemu. poprzez granie
Subject: Zářijová ZK horečka je tady
Link on message: #18720025
karosatori, on 09 September 2021 - 11:10 AM, said: Chápu to vzhledem k posledním speciálům správně, že jste konečně
přesunuli víkendové akce z rozmezí sobota ráno - úterý ráno na
pátek ráno - pondělí ráno, sstyx?
Bynk_hero, on 09 September 2021 - 03:06 PM, said: zlevněnou konverzi ZK na volné
ZK (1 = 25 35), abyste si odemkli moduly
nebo... Obávam sa že toto je tu trochu úplne mimo. Po pridaní
polného vybavenie všetky volné skúsenosti na tankoch idú viete
kam.... :-)
Link on message: #18720025

Sstyx: Posunulo se to již před nějakou dobou. Novinkou je, že to chceme
pokud to bude možné oznamovat vždy ve čtvrtek, tedy den před
začátkem. Což byly připomínky od hráčů a chtěli jsme vyjít vstříc,
protože připomínky byly oprávněné. Momentálně je zde pár změn,
chceme zkusit pár věcí a uvidíme jak to půjde.

Sstyx: Nemusí, ne všichni to tak dělají. Mám stále 3,7M volných a nedávám
je do polního.
Subject: Can a clan member play my account ?
Link on message: #18719962
PeaceWalker1, on 09 September 2021 - 02:58 PM, said: I think account sharing is forbidden, but its not like WG will find
out about it if you do it anyway. Just make sure that you trust the
guy and know that you are technically violating the rules by doing
so.
Link on message: #18719962

HeatResistantBFG: yeah not like he posted on the forums telling
us 

Subject: Is this the end of the way?
Link on message: #18719948
Miepie, on 09 September 2021 - 11:20 AM, said: You're going to wipe his account to give him something to
do? 
Link on message: #18719948


HeatResistantBFG: i mean... that's wayyyy better! Good idea! Will make sure you get
the credit! 

Subject: Recon Mission Stage 2 is Here!
Link on message: #18719947
Abramsfaust, on 08 September 2021 - 02:06 PM, said: Can't get why you put this at the same time with Ranked. Guess I
skip Recon again
Myshra, on 08 September 2021 - 07:38 PM, said: Why at the same time as ranked? What about all the other
times in the year with no events?
NOR_Tank, on 08 September 2021 - 03:55 PM, said: Nice feature and should continue to be available in later stages
also. However, i dont understand why it should counts towards the
stats and MOE. Maybe less yolo play, but ALOT of people avoid this
mode now since the stats/MOE is counted. Just an advice if you want
more people to particpate, remove that it counts in the MOE.
Jumping_Turtle, on 09 September 2021 - 03:39 PM, said: It would really help if stats were left out of this mode. Would stop a lot of toxicity when people are wondering in not such a nice way why I have no clue about where to go since they think their stats and moe are way too important.
MeetriX, on 08 September 2021 - 04:09 PM, said: Mirrored maps.
Link on message: #18719947

Dwigt: Not all players are interested in Ranked Battles and would prefer
something more casual. It's a different gameplay, more casual and
has a different purpose.

Dwigt: We want to keep feeding the mode with new maps and new content as
long as you are enjoying it
The stats and MoE are counted in
the mode so that the players will take the mode seriously like
random battles and play as if they were playing in randoms, to win
and so that way they will be providing is with more accurate and
real data close to how you would act on these map if they go
live.


Dwigt: The 2D map might look mirrored but the actual map will play
differently and there is always space for the players to experiment
new way to play it.I answered a similar question recently asking
why all maps look alike. IMO I guess to create a map there are
some rules and requirements that should be on the map for each
side to.
I would add to what you said, "seem like mirrored but not 100% copy"
I would add to what you said, "seem like mirrored but not 100% copy"
Jumping_Turtle, on 09 September 2021 - 03:39 PM, said: It would really help if stats were left out of this mode. Would stop a lot of toxicity when people are wondering in not such a nice way why I have no clue about where to go since they think their stats and moe are way too important.
Dwigt:

Dwigt:
Subject: L'Étape 2 de Mission de reconnaissance est disponible !
Link on message: #18719934
Black_Nabla, on 09 September 2021 - 03:07 PM, said: Honnêtement, je ne vois pas comment on peut reprocher à WG
de faire des maps trop grandes !!! J'espere qu'ils ne liront jamais
ce type d'avis.
Link on message: #18719934

Actinid: Trop tard
. Blague à part, je remonterai
que les opinions diffèrent et partagerai vos deux argumentations.

Subject: Get Into the September XP Fever
Link on message: #18719893
Cro006, on 09 September 2021 - 03:13 PM, said: So these missions with introduction of field modifications finally
became relevant again.
Truntea, on 09 September 2021 - 01:57 PM, said: Another weekend without any missions I guess. 
tehniclugoj, on 09 September 2021 - 12:47 PM, said: can this be done on recon? i found no info on that subject...and it
only seems logical to be available in recon too, please admin check
out and answer, ty
Link on message: #18719893

Dwigt: Should be an easy 10k on low tiers and 20k are always a nice reward
for high tier, especially now!


Dwigt: 20-30k XP from those missions are a quick Tier X field mod
upgrade.

Dwigt: Looks like the last 3 missions can be done in Recon mode since the
mode is only available from Tier 8s
Subject: L'Étape 2 de Mission de reconnaissance est disponible !
Link on message: #18719891
Pairisades, on 09 September 2021 - 05:30 AM, said: - visuellement, sur Contreforts, j'ai remarqué un problème
de texture sur une des bannières dans la zone urbaine, quand on est
encore un peu à distance de celle-ci (le temps que mon char lourd
arrive à destination j'ai eu un peu le loisir d'observer le
paysage)
Link on message: #18719891

Actinid: Tu as une impression écran ? Merci pour vos premier retours,
ils ont été remontés. Je vous invite à continuer à poster vos
avis ici, je continuerai à les remonter. Merci
Subject: Agenda du mois : les évènements de septembre et des surprises
Link on message: #18719853
Pairisades, on 09 September 2021 - 01:12 PM, said: Bonjour, Je suis surpris qu'il n'y ait toujours pas
d'article concer le Tank Wars qui doit commencer demain matin.
@Actinid L'événement est-il maintenu ?
Link on message: #18719853

Actinid:
Oui =).Tu auras plus d'informations demain.
Oui =).Tu auras plus d'informations demain.
Subject: Au sommet de l'Arbre : Type 5 Heavy
Link on message: #18719851
xkikit, on 09 September 2021 - 01:31 PM, said: Yeah !!!! C’est avec ce genre de réponse que l’on va faire
avancer le problème, c’est à dire que ce char est chi*** , pénible,
ringard à jouer. Si vous vous contentez de répondre sans
faire remonter les informations, ici fortement négatives, sur ce
char, tout le monde peut le faire !!!! FAITES REMONTER !
On accepte de ce char qu’il ne soit ni mobile ni rapide !
Mais de s’en prendre plein la face, c’est inadmissible !!!
Allooooo Vivement le 20 septembre que je foute ce
char au garage, et certainement pour un grand moment, puisque vous
semblez ne pas comprendre les mauvais retours que nous vous faisons
pour l’améliorer. Bien à vous.
Link on message: #18719851

Actinid:
Le rôle des modérateurs du forum n'est pas de faire remonter les informations mais de s'assurer du respect des règles du forum. =) Quant au fait de remonter les informations, je t'invite à écrire un avis argumenté, courtois et je peux t'assurer que ce dernier sera partagé.
Le rôle des modérateurs du forum n'est pas de faire remonter les informations mais de s'assurer du respect des règles du forum. =) Quant au fait de remonter les informations, je t'invite à écrire un avis argumenté, courtois et je peux t'assurer que ce dernier sera partagé.
Subject: Späheinsatz: Abschnitt 2 ist da!
Link on message: #18719808
Dibell, on 08 September 2021 - 04:51 PM, said: NACHTRAG: Auch nach 17 Gefechten bleibt der gute Eindruck
bestehen - Live schalten - JETZT!
Horny_Hans, on 09 September 2021 - 12:00 PM, said: Nordwesten war eine meiner absoluten Lieblingskarten. Ich hab keine
Ahnung warum die unbedingt raus musste damals. Eine
Unbalanziertheit (die vorgeschoben wurde) konnte ich nicht
feststellen.
Link on message: #18719808

Zapfhan: Ich danke mal für das Lob


Zapfhan: Die Karte hatte wie auch andere entfernte Karten einen
massiven Vorteil für eine Seite und war unausbalanicert und zwar
stärker als so manche Karte, die aktuell als total unbalanced
bezeichnet wird.
Subject: Den September mit dem EP-Fieber erforschen
Link on message: #18719743
elektroberto, on 09 September 2021 - 12:34 PM, said: Sind die Belohnungs- und Premiumpanzer der Stufe 9 neu dabei, oder
war das schon vorher so? Auf jeden fall schön! Die
Feldaufrüstung geht damit noch schneller von statten!
Horny_Hans, on 09 September 2021 - 12:45 PM, said: Gute Frage. Sind die Belohnungspanzer nicht gänzlich neu
dabei bei dem Fieber? Also ich meine, dass da vorher immer nur
Premiumpanzer stand. Und Stufe 9 erinnere ich mich überhaupt nicht,
das schonmal gelesen zu haben bei der Ankündigung.
Link on message: #18719743

Zapfhan:

Zapfhan: Tier IX Rewards waren auch davor schon ein paar mal
dabei.
Subject: WoT heading full speed in the same wall as WoW
Link on message: #18719562
gpalsson, on 08 September 2021 - 10:17 PM, said:
Since you seem to be gathering feedback, I will just add some of my own if you don't mind, and maybe you can bring some insight as to why some things are the way they are? 1) Overall, the new maps are great (the ones we test in recon). Sadly they all have camper bushes in the base. Why does WG feel the maps need these ledges? 2) Great changes with arty, but 3 is still too much IMO. Id rather have more relaxed rules on other parts like equal HT/MT if you must know which one to remove
Maps like airfield gets completely broken with more
than 1 arty. 3) Great changes with HE. 4) Equipment 2 is much
better than before 5) I would rather have +-1mm, I think the
powercreep has made +-2mm a bit too much of a gap. I actually enjoy
+-0mm the most, but I understand the need for some mixed tiers for
various reasons, not the least the incentive to go up tiers for
newer players. T 56 twoshotting tier 6 isn't fair, even when I am
in the T56 I don't find it enjoyable. 6) Lately in platoon, there
seems to be something weird going on where we get the 2-3 same maps
over and over again for a very long time (an hour at least). Is
that something you are looking in to, and are aware of? 7) Will you
ever balance the map mines properly? Lastly, I took a break
for a few years and recently returned. The game is much more
enjoyable now than when I left. Mainly because of the changes to
artillery, which was what brought me back.
Link on message: #18719562

Since you seem to be gathering feedback, I will just add some of my own if you don't mind, and maybe you can bring some insight as to why some things are the way they are? 1) Overall, the new maps are great (the ones we test in recon). Sadly they all have camper bushes in the base. Why does WG feel the maps need these ledges? 2) Great changes with arty, but 3 is still too much IMO. Id rather have more relaxed rules on other parts like equal HT/MT if you must know which one to remove

HeatResistantBFG: I'm not part of the map design team so can't give you an
official answer here really. If I was to guess the maps are
designed to have choke points and defence positions that make you
have to "go around" or such things, that way a player using skill
can take a key position to play against a larger number in both
directions (skilful use of a defensive position for defender,
skilful use of a route to flank the enemy for the attacker). If the
number of arty in the queue is too large then it will simply be
impossible to introduce a cap without seriously affecting the MM
for all in ways players wouldn't want, we are always looking for
ways to improve and so if this changes or we find ways to overcome
this, and it will result in a better experience for players we
would of course want to implement it. Agreed
Agreed again, i hadn't played WoT
since pre 1.0 and had been on console and so coming to equipment
2.0 it was a nice change to me, and i love that ability to
customise/highlight aspects of tanks more... who doesn't love 70kph
+ KPZ
(apart from light
tanks
) Similar to #2, MM is something we
know is important to our players, and although i think it's in the
best place it has been yet it can still be better. It is something
we highlight as something players are wanting improvement on
It is something that has been
flagged by a few people, there is every chance it's luck (good or
bad, depending on how much you like the map I guess lol) but we're
looking into it either way
As in #1, I'm not on the map
design team nor am I an expert. So I would say I quite like
mines and can't think of finding one side more winnable than the
other, certainly not compared to the actions of my team (More
likely to say "ah, my team didn't get X so this is going to be hard
to win" than "ah, I spawned north so basically already
won"
. If the map stats show it to be
one-sided or have any issues I'm sure it'll be on the map teams
radar though
Seems you are in a similar
boat to me
I couldn't play pc because I
didn't have a pc good enough, played console WoT instead, then got
a PC that could run it and started WoT on NA and EU (to play with
friends on NA and EU because I lived in the UK) as well as alpha of
Warships. Eventually being a student and trying to pay prem time
across all platforms and having been so much further into WoTc
meant I stopped with WoT (although still followed/watched it,
obviously) and had recently started again before getting the chance
to work here and here I am! And I'm of a similar mind to you, all
the recent changes have been good and made the game better.








Subject: Is this the end of the way?
Link on message: #18719538
Link on message: #18719538
Dwigt: Well if congratulations are still in order, we definitely should!
Zmago is an active member on the forums and deserves a nice gift
for this achievement! 

Subject: Is this the end of the way?
Link on message: #18719521
Link on message: #18719521
HeatResistantBFG: Hmmmmm, I think this needs a special something
What do you think
Dwigt? 


Subject: Is World of Tanks Pay to Win?
Link on message: #18719505
jabster, on 08 September 2021 - 05:36 PM, said: You’ve now added massive/extreme to your meaning of pay-to-win and
yes that is treating people like idiots. As for your overall
win-rate argument, seriously you’re putting that forward. Have
you not heard of win-rate curves?
Marco_Is_Legend2019, on 08 September 2021 - 05:41 PM, said: Oldest trick in the books. Serb, 2013, T57 heavy. "The tank
winrate depends on the ratio of good and bad players playing it".
Marco_Is_Legend2019, on 08 September 2021 - 06:08 PM, said: 'd to avoid scroll fest Genuinely, I think you're confusing
better with bigger or something like that. Tier 10 tanks are
certainly the latter but not necessarily the former. Tier 10s have
performance figures (win rate curves) just like tier 8s. Therefore
a fair comparison can be done. A 50% overall player will have a
better performance, win more battles on average, in their Defender
(purple) than in the E100 (green).
In general I find this line of thought to be extremely poor.
What about tiers that don't meet a tier 10? Are they by definition
immune to P2W? Tanks there can't be P2W because surely they don't
compare to the tier 10s. Doesn't matter though to the Pz. 5/4 when
it performs like this...
Link on message: #18719505

HeatResistantBFG: I did, because I wanted to make sure I wasn't talking
out my rear end and so I googled definitions of pay to win, went
through several and found commonalities throughout them all and
that concept was one and not something I had emphasised at
first. All of them emphasised either a huge or statistically
undeniably better thing, purchasable for exclusively money or as
near to impossible to grind as possible. I'm not treating anyone
like an idiot and don't see how in any way I am or even could be. I
said my stance, I explained it, you presented something you believe
to be in opposition to my opinion/stance, I disagree that it
impacts it, explained why... Where is that treating anyone like an
idiot? Then on win rate curves, I literally talk about that...
in the example. Because yes, the reality is balancing a tank across
a multitude of win rates can obviously be tricky. A tank can do
very poorly with lower win rates but very good with high win
rates, so statically it'll be massively underperforming due to more
lower win rate players playing it, so should it be buffed? Making
it even stronger in higher win rate player hands...
which is exactly why I said this
is a totally different conversation and yet none of this changes or
challenges my point. If you can tell me where/how I treated
anyone like an idiot I will happily try to remedy it



HeatResistantBFG: I mean that is a fact, so not really a trick. I could have
told you that without needing a WeeGee tag. Defining how balanced a
tank is or what changes it could do with on the other hand is far
more complicated and that is obviously just part of it.



HeatResistantBFG: Fair point, I'll add more explanation from my point of
view. So the way I see it is if like "Gear", so take something like
diablo where gear is levelled and then rarity, the best gear will
always be the "rarest" level 70 (Ancient primals IIRC) and to me
tier 10 is that ancient primal. This also fits with the design
premise of the game from my understanding of it, developed as a
player. I'm aware people may not agree with that but it's just how
I view it and how it matches the definitions I have found/know of
whether or not something is pay to win, and of course everyone is
entitled to their own opinion. The balance of premium tanks at
their tier is a different question, although it obviously covers
some similar areas, but to be fundamentally pay to win it has
to meet certain criteria and WoT simply doesn't (in my opinion and
matching to the definitions I found which helped form my stance).
Subject: Holt das Beste aus dem Sommer heraus mit Prime Gaming!
Link on message: #18719470
DeGekko, on 08 September 2021 - 06:33 PM, said: Anscheinend! Da hat WG mal wieder verkackt! Es macht keinen
Sinn die normalen Prime Aufträge nur mit den Miettanks absolvieren
zu dürfen. Bisher war das zweite Set an Aufträgen(welches nun auch
gestrichen wurde) nur mit den Miettanks zu absolvieren.
Einfach mal wieder total unfähig der Verein!
dahoeman, on 09 September 2021 - 07:07 AM, said: - Es gibt keine "Kommandanten" mehr (kann ich aufgrund des
Battlepasses aber nachvollziehen) - Die Anzahl der x5-Aufträge
gingen über die Zeit zurück - Es gab die letzten beiden(?) Male
noch Zubehör zu erspielen mittels Base-XP und das mit vorgegebenen
Mietpanzern - ENTFÄLLT jetzt! - Die normalen Prime-Aufträge konnten
mit allen Panzern absolviert werden - Jetzt nur noch mit den
vorgegebenen Mietpanzern!
Link on message: #18719470

Zapfhan: Wie bisher auch immer, gibt es mit jedem Paket unterscheide,
das 2. Set an Aufträgen gab es nicht immer, warum muss es also hier
enthalten sein.

Zapfhan: Immer wenn es Kommandanten gibt, wird selbiges bemängelt und
angemerkt, dass man eh schon zu viele davon hatDass es in zwei
vorherigen Paketen ein 2. Set an Aufträgen gab is korrekt, dies war
davor aber auch nicht verfügbar.
Subject: Is World of Tanks Pay to Win?
Link on message: #18718863
jabster, on 08 September 2021 - 04:19 PM, said: No it’s not irrelevant and nor is it a strawman argument. Oh
and please don’t try argument ad emoji.
jabster, on 08 September 2021 - 04:39 PM, said:
I think it’s a good thing when WG interact with the forum but I’m not ok when they treat them like idiots.
Link on message: #18718863

HeatResistantBFG:

I think it’s a good thing when WG interact with the forum but I’m not ok when they treat them like idiots.
HeatResistantBFG: Not treating anyone like an idiot, if my point is that
no exclusive sold vehicle is best as tier 10 will always be the
best vehicles and are not exclusively sold, so where would the
performance of a tier 8 fit into that?And I mean that genuinely,
I think I know but it'd be wrong of me to assume your
reasoning. To be pay to win, every definition I've found
seems to imply a near exclusivity (near impossible to grind without
paying, or simply only paid) and a
"massive/extreme/etc" advantage over the "free" best
available.Well for World of Tanks the "best" is tier 10, and so for
a sold tier 8 to be pay to win then it would need to give you a
"massive" advantage over a tier 10 player, that a free to play
player would not be able to obtain.And as any free to play player
can get a tier 10 it would make it not pay to win. And I mean it
with no disrespect or intent to demean your intelligence when I
say, I do not see how the performance of a tier 8 fits into
that. And that's before you take into account a more in-depth
analysis of how a tank performs and it's impact across the
playerbaseEg Tank A has 52% win rate Tank B has 49% win rate
Conclusions, Tank A is overperforming aka OP, Tank b is
underperforming aka UnderPowered Broken Down Tank A has 52% overall
Win Rate, Dispersion curve of players show peak player numbers
around 54%, so the majority of its games are by players with
54% Tank B has 49% overall win rate, Dispersion curve of players
show peak at player numbers around 48%, so the majority of
its games are by players with 48% Conclusion Tank A is
underperforming, Tank B is slightly overperforming Broken Down
further Tank A has 52% overall Win Rate, Dispersion curve of
players show peak player numbers around 54%, so the majority
of its games are by players with 54%. There is a secondary peak of
popularity is around 48% win rate, skewing the win rate overall
down, when mapping win rate in tank vs win rate of the player, tank
show slight deviation at the extremes but remains "on" line for the
rest. Tank B has 49% overall win rate, Dispersion curve of
players show peak at player numbers around 48%, so the
majority of its games are by players with 48% There is a
secondary peak of popularity is around 56% win rate, skewing the
win rate overall up, when mapping win rate in tank vs win rate of
the player, tank shows no deviation at lower win rates but at
higher win rates skews of low. Conclusion Tank A is quite well
balanced but could be a candidate for very slight nerfs, Tank B is
clearly underperforming amongst high win rate players, candidate
for slight buffs. As hopefully the example shows, the
performance of a vehicle and if it's OP/UP is a WHOLE other
rabbit hole to go down lol. And I don't know the "deep" details for
our tanks, so I'm not really in a position to say (objectively)
whether it performs above or below without the full info and a lot
of time to study it
But even with this info, I don't
see how it would change a tier 10 being better and free, compared
to any exclusively sold tank. My mind is not set in stone and
I'm seriously open to info/suggestions etc


Subject: Is World of Tanks Pay to Win?
Link on message: #18718749
jabster, on 08 September 2021 - 03:48 PM, said: Did (or does) the Defender perform, on average, above a player’s
global win-rate?
NUKLEAR_SLUG, on 08 September 2021 - 03:53 PM, said: TVP
Link on message: #18718749

HeatResistantBFG: It's irrelevant and honestly, no idea haven't looked but I'm
sure I can make accurate assumptions, but it's a strawman argument
given my original point. For it to be pay to win it has to be
better than anything in the game that can be gained for free, so to
my point it doesn't matter. It of course could be a point of
discussion on the balance at tier 8 or of sold vehicles, but that's
not the discussion I was in


HeatResistantBFG: 

Subject: Is World of Tanks Pay to Win?
Link on message: #18718734
jabster, on 08 September 2021 - 03:28 PM, said: So you don’t think the Defender gave an advantage then?
Link on message: #18718734

HeatResistantBFG: Defender vs E-100, who wins?
Subject: Sezon V Przepustki bitewnej: Przewodnik po wydarzeniu
Link on message: #18718717
Rave_PL, on 06 September 2021 - 04:50 PM, said: Jak wykupić brakujące elementy stylu 3D? Ani w sklepie ani w
magazynie nie widzę takiej opcji.
Link on message: #18718717

ApocalipticSnowflake: Musisz założyć styl i wybrać który poziom chciałbyś odblokować.
Poniżej przykład:

Subject: Is World of Tanks Pay to Win?
Link on message: #18718701
Link on message: #18718701
HeatResistantBFG: So there is a lot of Wall-o-Texts here and not going to lie and say
I read them all, but I read a lot
So, I'm going to say World of Tanks is in no way
Pay to Win (shocker, I know), and we are quite open that we are pay
to progress. I quite liked that flow chart but as with
anything it is open to subjectivity, realistically there is nothing
you can get in-game that is the "Best" for money. And if you
were going to say "X prem tank says otherwise" well any tier 10
says otherwise, and as long as you will face tier 10 and there is
no tier 10 for sale only then it isn't pay to win. "Tier 9
prem tank so tier 10 prem tank soonTM" response before you say it
Before the "oh but you said you'd never sell tier 9s, so only a
matter of time before OP Tier 10 prems" actually no, we never said
that... we said near the opposite, in one of the QnAs a couple of
years ago someone asked if tier 9 and 10 premiums were considered,
and the reply was roughly that "tier 9 is something we have
considered, but it wasn't being focused on" (at the time). And
currently, I can say we asked for a stance on this and as it stands
there is no plans for tier 10 premiums. Not that we are considering
them but not atm or anything like that, just simply we are
currently not considering them. So for now at least, tier 10
tanks are not exclusively sold and will always be the "best"
and therefore no tank can technically be pay to win, as an
"available for free" one is always better and available All
in all, there is nothing in this game that can give you an
advantage that can be only/exclusively obtained for real money,
therefore objectively it remains not pay to win. You can pay to get
stuff quicker and spend less real-time getting it, but that's not
paying to win, that's paying to speed up/progress. Having resources
can give you an advantage sure, but unless there is an exclusivity
it doesn't meet the objective meaning of pay to win.

Subject: Otázky a odpovědi
Link on message: #18718683
Mr_Missclick, on 08 September 2021 - 03:23 PM, said: Běžné dotazy, ke kterým navíc existuje volně dohledatelné info,
klidně můžou obsloužit i moderátoři.
Koneckonců jejich úloha na diskuzních fórech není jenom
tichá moderace závadného obsahu, ale celková podpora komunity na
této platformě. Na EN fóru to tak třeba funguje, resp. fungovalo -
teď už to tam poslední měsíce moc nesleduji, tak snad se něco
nezměnilo. Každopádně je organizačně nesmysl, aby komunitní
manažer odpovídal na všechno, když si na to může postavit tým
lidiček.
Link on message: #18718683


Sstyx: Jak již několikrát bylo napsáno, naše představy se diametrálně
rozcházejí v tom, co znamená být CM. Možná v jiné firmě či u jiných
CM, ale pro mě to znamená být tu pro hráče a odepisovat jim na
jejich dotazy, pokud to neudělá někdo jiný. Pokud k tomu příjdu
první, tak také jako první odepíši.EN komunita je neporovnatelně
větší než naše, takže tam je to zcela pochopitelné. Naši moderátoři
to nemají zakázano, ale také ani nakázáno.
Subject: L'Étape 2 de Mission de reconnaissance est disponible !
Link on message: #18718616
4umAccount, on 08 September 2021 - 02:31 PM, said: au moins, cette fois-ci c'est + clair je déteste déjà la carte Lieu
de puissance
Link on message: #18718616

Actinid:
Pourquoi ?
Pourquoi ?
Subject: Die Neue Saison der gewerteten Gefechte 2021–2022 beginnt!
Link on message: #18718578
Nemii29, on 08 September 2021 - 02:03 PM, said:
Solange Kran, STB 1, Vz 55 metha sind sind die anderen eh Exoten. Egal ob Reward oder Techtree AMX 30B ist doch auch nicht mehr Techtree oder. Also auch so ein komisches Ding
China WZ 5 Drachen Abklatsch ging für Credits raus...
Link on message: #18718578

Solange Kran, STB 1, Vz 55 metha sind sind die anderen eh Exoten. Egal ob Reward oder Techtree AMX 30B ist doch auch nicht mehr Techtree oder. Also auch so ein komisches Ding

Zapfhan: AMX 30B ist weiterhin dauerhaft für Credits verfügbar (wie
der 113 oder T-62A auch)Der Qilin war für Credits verfügbar aber
ist es nicht dauerhaft
Реклама | Adv