Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1252638
Codin, on 02 January 2012 - 03:36 PM, said: Are you considering giving the jagdpanzerIV special matchmaking, so
it won't meet tiers 9? The 88 can't penetrate IS4 at all, even
sides and rear.

Link on message: #1252638

Overlord: No. There are others targets apart IS-4 even in tier 10 battles.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1252626
ZorinWarfield, on 02 January 2012 - 06:22 PM, said: Will the map designers start to build maps that have realistic
elevation levels? Especially the new French tanks with the
oscillating turrets have major disadvantages on the numerous maps
with exaggerated elevation levels (Westfield etc.), being unable to
fire back at enemies shooting down from bridges, cliffs and
ridges.
The turrets are realistic, your landscape modelling on the other hand is pure fantasy and should be binned asap, especially with the forthcoming physics. Otherwise I don't see how you will justify heavy tanks roll up and down the massively angled slopes on most maps.

Link on message: #1252626

The turrets are realistic, your landscape modelling on the other hand is pure fantasy and should be binned asap, especially with the forthcoming physics. Otherwise I don't see how you will justify heavy tanks roll up and down the massively angled slopes on most maps.
Overlord: Fictional maps can't have "realistic" elevation levels.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1252621
ares354, on 02 January 2012 - 06:04 PM, said: Dear Overlord
You mention historic reasons for T-95 Buff, but why are nearly all german tanks far too slow.
1 Question, Why German vehicles have wrong speed and armour??
Tiger II 38km/h (real) vs. 28 km/h (wot)?
Tiger I 38 km/h (real) vs. 34 km/h (wot)?
Panzer II 55 km/h (real) vs. 40 km/h (wot)?
JT 38km/h (real) vs. 27km/h (Wot)? Armour - hull 150, 40, lower hull 100, 40 ?? values ??
Mause - dawn hull should have 300 mm armour, http://forum.worldof...and-schematics/ -> post 19. Why Mause dont have this armour tickness values ??
on the other hand:
1 Why Soviet tanks have no historic spped and armour ??
KV-13 51 km/h (real) vs. 60 km/h (wot)?
T-28 37 km/h (real) vs. 45 km/h (wot)?
t-54 - have 99 armour on front hull - look - >Armour 203 mm turret, 99 mm hull, LOS = ~200 mm?? Why armour is incorrect ?? - I have this information from Site, where t54 is described
Overlord, you mention that you stick historic reason, so pleas, tell US all, WHY German tanks, TD don't have historic Speed and Armour ETC ??
Last Question, Why tanks with 2 loaders, dont reload GUN faster?????

Link on message: #1252621

You mention historic reasons for T-95 Buff, but why are nearly all german tanks far too slow.
1 Question, Why German vehicles have wrong speed and armour??
Tiger II 38km/h (real) vs. 28 km/h (wot)?
Tiger I 38 km/h (real) vs. 34 km/h (wot)?
Panzer II 55 km/h (real) vs. 40 km/h (wot)?
JT 38km/h (real) vs. 27km/h (Wot)? Armour - hull 150, 40, lower hull 100, 40 ?? values ??
Mause - dawn hull should have 300 mm armour, http://forum.worldof...and-schematics/ -> post 19. Why Mause dont have this armour tickness values ??
on the other hand:
1 Why Soviet tanks have no historic spped and armour ??
KV-13 51 km/h (real) vs. 60 km/h (wot)?
T-28 37 km/h (real) vs. 45 km/h (wot)?
t-54 - have 99 armour on front hull - look - >Armour 203 mm turret, 99 mm hull, LOS = ~200 mm?? Why armour is incorrect ?? - I have this information from Site, where t54 is described
Overlord, you mention that you stick historic reason, so pleas, tell US all, WHY German tanks, TD don't have historic Speed and Armour ETC ??
Last Question, Why tanks with 2 loaders, dont reload GUN faster?????
Overlord: 1-2. Covered many times already. Won't go back to it once
again.
3. RoF is tailored mostly according to balance needs, while crew sizes are usually historically correct.
3. RoF is tailored mostly according to balance needs, while crew sizes are usually historically correct.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Обсуждение игры\Общие дискуссии\Контр-батарейная борьба: плюсы и минусы
Link on message: #1251874
Constantinius, on 30 December 2011 - 01:29 PM, said: Ну, я играл с трассерами и был рад, что их убрали. Т.к. ещё раз
повторюсь, что есть карты, где арта физически не может нормально
бегать. Места нет. Более того. Меняется сама тактика боя.
Жаль, что у меня нет игровой статистики, но уверен, после патча, арта стала намного меньше наносить дамага не только из-за изменений в уроне, но и из-за изменения тактики боя. Все эти переплёвывания по трассам... Есть в этом что-то порочно-неправильное. Искусственное. Как будто в игру ввели баг, пытаясь из него сделать фичу.

Link on message: #1251874

Жаль, что у меня нет игровой статистики, но уверен, после патча, арта стала намного меньше наносить дамага не только из-за изменений в уроне, но и из-за изменения тактики боя. Все эти переплёвывания по трассам... Есть в этом что-то порочно-неправильное. Искусственное. Как будто в игру ввели баг, пытаясь из него сделать фичу.
OldFox: Ты просто привык играть без трассеров. Я, например, с февраля 2010
до когда-там трассеры убрали и не мыслил себе игры без
контрбатарейной борьбы. Это в крови. Сейчас трассеры есть, но пофиг
- народ ими не пользуется. А я все равно переезжаю. Потому что
попадешь на артовода старой школы, так он тебя завалит моментом.
Правда, их все меньше и меньше.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Какой конкурс провести?
Link on message: #1251647

Link on message: #1251647
OldFox: 1. Это для вас все, что пишет и рекламирует Ник Лемос,
автоматически подлежит обструкции. Для меня он абсолютно такой же
посетитель форума, как все остальные. И не важно, какие чувства я
лично к нему питаю, я не имею права руководствоваться этим в своей
работе, не имею права официально относиться к нему так же, как
большинство коммьюнити. Потому что я НЕ коммьюнити.
2. Было доказано лишь то, что формула сайта wot-news.com не работает на малом количестве боев, то есть, если начинать с нуля. Мы это учли.
3. Никто в прибалтийских коммьюнити не утверждал, что формула плохая, а приняли участие в конкурсе гораздо больше людей, чем в РУ-коммьюнити. Я обязан повторно провести конкурс хотя бы ради них.
4. Пока альтернативной формулы нет, будем пользоваться этой.
5. Участие в конкурсе - дело добровольное. Но конкурс будет, причем по формуле сайта wot-news.com без каких-либо исправлений, причем, с двойным призовым фондом. Участвовать или нет - ваше дело.
6. Решение принято, и все дальнейшие обсуждения решения о проведении конкурса будут рассматриваться мной как обсуждение действий администрации и караться РО 6 дней.
7. О дате старта конкурса сообщу дополнительно.
2. Было доказано лишь то, что формула сайта wot-news.com не работает на малом количестве боев, то есть, если начинать с нуля. Мы это учли.
3. Никто в прибалтийских коммьюнити не утверждал, что формула плохая, а приняли участие в конкурсе гораздо больше людей, чем в РУ-коммьюнити. Я обязан повторно провести конкурс хотя бы ради них.
4. Пока альтернативной формулы нет, будем пользоваться этой.
5. Участие в конкурсе - дело добровольное. Но конкурс будет, причем по формуле сайта wot-news.com без каких-либо исправлений, причем, с двойным призовым фондом. Участвовать или нет - ваше дело.
6. Решение принято, и все дальнейшие обсуждения решения о проведении конкурса будут рассматриваться мной как обсуждение действий администрации и караться РО 6 дней.
7. О дате старта конкурса сообщу дополнительно.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Какой конкурс провести?
Link on message: #1251562
OldFox, on 02 January 2012 - 10:29 PM, said: Сделаем 1000 или 500, новичков тут нет.

Link on message: #1251562

LiannaSilverwind: Что будет с героями дня декабрьских конкурсов, в честном бою
доказавших полную бессмысленность формулы?
История начинает повторяться:
Приходит кто-то, приносит формулу, рекламирует формулу, несмотря на свист публики. Формула принимается, конкурс начинается, кто-то не побеждает, кто-то оспаривает формулу, конкурс... отменяется. Кто-то приносит ту же формулу, но требует маленьких изменений, дабы неработающая формула казалась более работающей.
История начинает повторяться:
Приходит кто-то, приносит формулу, рекламирует формулу, несмотря на свист публики. Формула принимается, конкурс начинается, кто-то не побеждает, кто-то оспаривает формулу, конкурс... отменяется. Кто-то приносит ту же формулу, но требует маленьких изменений, дабы неработающая формула казалась более работающей.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Какой конкурс провести?
Link on message: #1250574
NikLemos, on 02 January 2012 - 09:43 PM, said: Кроме того категорически настаиваю на минимальном числе боёв для
начала участия в конкурсе. Хотя бы 500 боёв. В крайнем случае
100.
То есть людей до 100 или до 500. НЕ принимать к участию в конкурсе. Из-за слишком больших статистических погрешностей.
В принципе у человека со 100-200 боями формула эта (с поправкой) уже работает очень хорошо.

Link on message: #1250574

То есть людей до 100 или до 500. НЕ принимать к участию в конкурсе. Из-за слишком больших статистических погрешностей.
В принципе у человека со 100-200 боями формула эта (с поправкой) уже работает очень хорошо.
OldFox: Сделаем 1000 или 500, новичков тут нет.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Конкурс поздравлений с Новым Годом
Link on message: #1249948
_AIV_, on 02 January 2012 - 07:13 PM, said: A kāpēc ne? 

Link on message: #1249948


OldFox: IP viens un tads pats.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Конкурс поздравлений с Новым Годом
Link on message: #1249623

Link on message: #1249623
OldFox: Не прокатит 

Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\LOL!
Link on message: #1249475
happytrippy, on 02 January 2012 - 05:26 PM, said: Haha look a this video:

Link on message: #1249475

Tanitha: While the video is funny, it should have gone in offtopic, and be
posted by a real account.
Alt accounts are against the EULA.
Tan.
Alt accounts are against the EULA.
Tan.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Какой конкурс провести?
Link on message: #1249428

Link on message: #1249428
OldFox: Мы обещали конкурс по формуле сайта wot-news.com, и он будет. Хотя
бы потому, что в прошлом месяце люди из ЛАТ, ЛИТ и ЕСТ коммьюнити
приняли активное участие, и мы не имеем права их кинуть. Взводный
марафон продумываем, согласовываем с Минском. Советы по регламенту
марафона с удовольствием выслушаю.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Do you want overlord’s blog back?
Link on message: #1248979
VonOtto, on 01 January 2012 - 10:31 PM, said: I like his Blog to. And its sad that are so many Trolls are out
there.
@Overlord
Don´t you take a break from Work. You needs a rest period.

Link on message: #1248979

@Overlord
Don´t you take a break from Work. You needs a rest period.
Overlord: Haven't had a vacation for a while indeed. Planning to do so some
time in summer.
Subject:
Off-Topic Discussion\Off-Topic\When is 7.1 update coming :-(
Link on message: #1248967
marko4231, on 31 December 2011 - 08:06 PM, said: Yo OL, is it 2012 alredy in Belarus ??
Its 20: 05 in Slovenia where i m from, so in 4 hours we wil be having lots of fireworks

Link on message: #1248967

Its 20: 05 in Slovenia where i m from, so in 4 hours we wil be having lots of fireworks

Overlord: There is a 2-hour gap between Belarus and Slovenia.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248958
Nazarov77, on 02 January 2012 - 03:08 PM, said: What about french premiums?
Panzerjager 35R, FCM 36 Pak40, 10,5 lefh 18 B2 finished, pictures from these tanks were posted in spring, also the FCM 2C bis was in a video and pictures.

Link on message: #1248958

Panzerjager 35R, FCM 36 Pak40, 10,5 lefh 18 B2 finished, pictures from these tanks were posted in spring, also the FCM 2C bis was in a video and pictures.
Overlord: Most likely they will come later. Many of the planned tanks are
finished, but we can't release them all at once.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248949
KuroNyra, on 02 January 2012 - 11:05 AM, said: Same question. I've heard that the 0.7.2. will bring the IS-6, The
Jadgtiger 8.8 and the T34 premium. And the Last TD branche USA.
Have you the name pf the patch that will bring the last german TD
tree?

Link on message: #1248949

Overlord: 1. 7.2 won't include premium JT and IS-6.
2. Not yet.
2. Not yet.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248946
Elnorka, on 02 January 2012 - 11:03 AM, said: It means that M103 will have one loader instead two loaders in T34?
Less loaders -> less ROF if i am right, or you hire chuck norris
as loader 
OR
M103 will keep two loaders but one of them will have secondary skill e.g. gunner-loader
Thanks for answer

Link on message: #1248946


OR
M103 will keep two loaders but one of them will have secondary skill e.g. gunner-loader
Thanks for answer
Overlord: RoF will be adjusted for balancing purposes and it doesn't strictly
depend on the number of loaders in crew.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248939
KuroNyra, on 02 January 2012 - 10:11 AM, said: The 8.8 KwK L71 and the 8.8 PaK L71 have seen the ratio of damage
done at 240 at the 7.0.
The problem is that this two gun's are using the same shell of the L56 version for TD and Tank who are still at 220 instead of 240(PaK for TD and KwK for Tank)
Sow why the damaged done is different?
This isn't logical. The shell are the same, the only difference is the penetration. And we all know that for exemple that the Jadgpanzer IV is underpowerful vs the Slugger/Jackson and the SU-100.
For a lot of player's, the non increased for the L56 isn't fair.
Are you going to fix that problem?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Now the Stug III got the same armor of the Jadgpanzer IV who got the same armor of the Jadgpanther. Will you buff the armor of the Jadgpanther in another patch?
80mm. Even M4 Sherman and Panze IV laugh't of the Jadgpanther. And the quantity of HP for the Jadgpnther isn't enought for balance that. Unlike the Panzer VI Tiger

Link on message: #1248939

The problem is that this two gun's are using the same shell of the L56 version for TD and Tank who are still at 220 instead of 240(PaK for TD and KwK for Tank)
Sow why the damaged done is different?
This isn't logical. The shell are the same, the only difference is the penetration. And we all know that for exemple that the Jadgpanzer IV is underpowerful vs the Slugger/Jackson and the SU-100.
For a lot of player's, the non increased for the L56 isn't fair.
Are you going to fix that problem?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Now the Stug III got the same armor of the Jadgpanzer IV who got the same armor of the Jadgpanther. Will you buff the armor of the Jadgpanther in another patch?
80mm. Even M4 Sherman and Panze IV laugh't of the Jadgpanther. And the quantity of HP for the Jadgpnther isn't enought for balance that. Unlike the Panzer VI Tiger
Overlord: 1. The damage increase was needed for balancing purposes. Not
planning to do the same for L56 guns.
2. No, balance-wise JP is ok.
2. No, balance-wise JP is ok.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248929
qrak01, on 01 January 2012 - 10:39 PM, said: Hello Overlord.
I would like to clarify that. Module setup, crew and research setup will be moved with KV-3 to tier 7, but accumulated experience will stay at tier 6? Why? We don't need experience at already researched tank.
That makes me a sad panda
Regards

Link on message: #1248929

I would like to clarify that. Module setup, crew and research setup will be moved with KV-3 to tier 7, but accumulated experience will stay at tier 6? Why? We don't need experience at already researched tank.
That makes me a sad panda

Regards
Overlord: We will announce the exact procedure in advance. I remind you that
the revision of the Soviet heavy line will come after 7.2.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248903
HELLVIS_666, on 02 January 2012 - 12:11 AM, said: Hi Overlord!
Sorry for picking up that point again. Are there some news if and maybe when a automated nickname change tool may come?
Thx and happy new year.

Link on message: #1248903

Sorry for picking up that point again. Are there some news if and maybe when a automated nickname change tool may come?
Thx and happy new year.
Overlord: As far as I know it hasn't been worked on for some time, and thus
is not ready yet.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248892
maszerk, on 01 January 2012 - 10:39 PM, said: Overlord, regarding to your above post (#1459) about IS-7, I want
to ask you those questions:
Q1: The huge commander's hatch of the T110 is still a weakspot of the tank, or "has been strenghtened"?
Q2: And you guys in WG thinking about changing/replacing the "R2D2" commander's hatch and/or the turret of the T110?
And if both answer is NO, I want to ask one more question, with all respect:
If the IS-7 didn't have any frontal weakspots, why has the T110 one(?) on the "easiest-to-hit" part?
Answer me please.
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I hope you can understand it.
IS-7_NO_frontal_weakspot.JPG

Link on message: #1248892

Q1: The huge commander's hatch of the T110 is still a weakspot of the tank, or "has been strenghtened"?
Q2: And you guys in WG thinking about changing/replacing the "R2D2" commander's hatch and/or the turret of the T110?
And if both answer is NO, I want to ask one more question, with all respect:
If the IS-7 didn't have any frontal weakspots, why has the T110 one(?) on the "easiest-to-hit" part?
Answer me please.
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I hope you can understand it.

Overlord: 1. Most likely for gameplay purposes we will make it stronger than
it was in reality.
2. No.
2. No.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248884
FrankyK, on 01 January 2012 - 10:06 PM, said: Ok, according to balance considerations, the IS-7 is meant to have
a strong frontal armor with no noteworthy weakspots and therefore,
as a compensation for its epic frontal armor and good speed, the
sides and rear armor are meant to be quite weak - in theory. But in
the game, the IS-7 still bounces lots of shots with Tier X guns at
its side, giving the IS-7 very tough side-armor, too. It's
sometimes even harder to damage an IS-7 from it's side than a Maus.
Well, is this actually interned and do you still think about
reworking the normalisation nerf of 0.7.0, which actually caused
these balance problems?
Thanks.

Link on message: #1248884

Thanks.
Overlord: I can't say that there are obvious balance problems with IS-7
bouncy armour. E.g. in my Patton I easily penetrate IS-7 from the
sides with AP ammo, and from the front with APCR ammo.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248860
abovein, on 01 January 2012 - 09:58 PM, said: man i cant log into the game... i changed password still nothing
.on worldoftanks.com password works. i am banned? if so shouldnt i
recived an email or something?

Link on message: #1248860

Overlord: Looks like your account is on the US server. Contact our customer
support, either eu or us.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248855
L3gi, on 01 January 2012 - 09:58 PM, said: Hey Overlord,
1. Heared fr tanks already arrived in .ru.. how do french tanks perform on ru servers? on testserver they seemed about to be most powerful, how is it live?
2. i have heared that you wanna bring in some new premium vehicles with every patch now. Could you please give us some rough info on that? does it mean to get "just t8" or maybe t6 and 7.. even spg?
Already some vehicles on the way except jtiger, is6 and t34?
3. hows about tank freezing now? will that be active when cw resumes? What kind of changes can we expect?

Link on message: #1248855

1. Heared fr tanks already arrived in .ru.. how do french tanks perform on ru servers? on testserver they seemed about to be most powerful, how is it live?
2. i have heared that you wanna bring in some new premium vehicles with every patch now. Could you please give us some rough info on that? does it mean to get "just t8" or maybe t6 and 7.. even spg?
Already some vehicles on the way except jtiger, is6 and t34?
3. hows about tank freezing now? will that be active when cw resumes? What kind of changes can we expect?
Overlord: 1. Just about to get first weekly stats from RU side in a few days.
From my experience (ARL-44, AMX 13 90), French are quite qood.
2. JT, IS-6, T34, new Chinese tier 6 medium, BrummBar, SturmTiger, E-25, etc
3. We still would like to test how it works out on RU server, however CWs there are still offline.
2. JT, IS-6, T34, new Chinese tier 6 medium, BrummBar, SturmTiger, E-25, etc
3. We still would like to test how it works out on RU server, however CWs there are still offline.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1248833
skaerials, on 01 January 2012 - 09:42 PM, said: Many Thanks,
Q. Will a test server will go up in advance so we can see what happens in advance.

Link on message: #1248833

Q. Will a test server will go up in advance so we can see what happens in advance.
Overlord: Yes, definitely. Same old procedure as for previous versions.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Какой конкурс провести?
Link on message: #1248617
SU_152rus, on 02 January 2012 - 02:06 PM, said: В итоге, "педобиры" набирают быстрее результаты "эффективности",
разве нет? Этого мало?

Link on message: #1248617

OldFox: Еще раз повторяю: мне все равно, кто быстрее набирает. Все в равных
условиях, поскольку никому не запрещено использовать как лоу-лвл
танки, так и хай-лвл технику. Я могу изменить решение о проведении
конкурса по формуле wot-news.com только в oдном случае: если
кто-нибудь предложит альтернативную формулу, которая будет лучше.
Причем решать, хороша формула или нет, будет не уважаемое
коммьюнити (я окончательно разуверился в его объективности), а
специалисты WG.
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Какой конкурс провести?
Link on message: #1248423
SU_152rus, on 02 January 2012 - 12:57 PM, said: Насчет перенесенного декабрьского конкурса. Формула вот-ньюс.ком
работает на любителей песочницы (ака "педобиров"). Почему?
Почитайте здесь - там люди разобрали
"Формулу Великого Лемоса" на металлолом. В итоге, люди ездящие на
нормальных (от 6 уровня и выше)танках практически в пролете.
SU_152rus, on 02 January 2012 - 12:57 PM, said: P.S. 2 ОлдФокс: прочитайте этот камент от 2012-01-01
21:27(МСК) (если отредактирует, то есть скрин).Таки мы
догадывались....

Link on message: #1248423

OldFox: Прочитал, не впечатлило. Никакого конструктивизма, одно
зубоскальство. Если вам не нравится формула сайта wot-news.com,
предложите свою. Если не можете предложить, будем проводить по
"вотньюсовской".

OldFox: Ник как всегда торопится, еще ничего не решено. Если какое-то
решение будет принято, я объявлю об этом публично. Никто не владеет
монополией на участие в данном эвенте (если он будет, конечно), так
как для меня все равны. Так что принять в нем участие сможет
каждый, кто умеет играть и будет готов бесплатно потратить свое
время и нервы на проведение боев.
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Eesti\Võistus uue aasta tervitamiseks
Link on message: #1247425

Link on message: #1247425
OldFox: We have winners:
1. plase - deide (LT) - 3000 gold: http://imageshack.us...atvirukas1.gif/
2. place - _AIV_ (RU) - 2000 gold: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1243551
3. place - punishersal (LV) - 1000 gold: http://img696.images...491/wot2012.jpg
Thx for all contest participants!
PS. To take the gold, please, send me in privat you ingame nickname & login (e-mail).
1. plase - deide (LT) - 3000 gold: http://imageshack.us...atvirukas1.gif/
2. place - _AIV_ (RU) - 2000 gold: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1243551
3. place - punishersal (LV) - 1000 gold: http://img696.images...491/wot2012.jpg
Thx for all contest participants!
PS. To take the gold, please, send me in privat you ingame nickname & login (e-mail).
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Конкурс поздравлений с Новым Годом
Link on message: #1247423

Link on message: #1247423
OldFox: We have winners:
1. plase - deide (LT) - 3000 gold: http://imageshack.us...atvirukas1.gif/
2. place - _AIV_ (RU) - 2000 gold: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1243551
3. place - punishersal (LV) - 1000 gold: http://img696.images...491/wot2012.jpg
Thx for all contest participants!
PS. To take the gold, please, send me in privat you ingame nickname & login (e-mail).
1. plase - deide (LT) - 3000 gold: http://imageshack.us...atvirukas1.gif/
2. place - _AIV_ (RU) - 2000 gold: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1243551
3. place - punishersal (LV) - 1000 gold: http://img696.images...491/wot2012.jpg
Thx for all contest participants!
PS. To take the gold, please, send me in privat you ingame nickname & login (e-mail).
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Lietuvių\Turnyrai ir konkursai\Viktorinos ir konkursai\Sveikinimų Naujųjų metų proga konkursas
Link on message: #1247416

Link on message: #1247416
OldFox: We have winners:
1. plase - deide (LT) - 3000 gold: http://imageshack.us...atvirukas1.gif/
2. place - _AIV_ (RU) - 2000 gold: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1243551
3. place - punishersal (LV) - 1000 gold: http://img696.images...491/wot2012.jpg
Thx for all contest participants!
PS. To take the gold, please, send me in privat you ingame nickname & login (e-mail).
1. plase - deide (LT) - 3000 gold: http://imageshack.us...atvirukas1.gif/
2. place - _AIV_ (RU) - 2000 gold: http://forum.worldof...ost__p__1243551
3. place - punishersal (LV) - 1000 gold: http://img696.images...491/wot2012.jpg
Thx for all contest participants!
PS. To take the gold, please, send me in privat you ingame nickname & login (e-mail).
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Turnīri un konkursi\Viktorīnas un konkursi\Jaunā gada apsveikumu konkurss
Link on message: #1247406

Link on message: #1247406
OldFox: Attached File(s)
atvirukas1.gif (85.7K)
Number of downloads: 41
734020.jpg (85.94K)
Number of downloads: 37
wot2012.jpg (979.21K)
Number of downloads: 35

Number of downloads: 41

Number of downloads: 37

Number of downloads: 35
Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Турниры и конкурсы\Викторины и конкурсы\Конкурс поздравлений с Новым Годом
Link on message: #1247380
DeathWalker_rus_, on 01 January 2012 - 08:22 PM, said: Ай, ну вы хоть приписывайте что конкурсы касаются не только
русскоязычного отдела форума, не все же знают.

Link on message: #1247380

OldFox: Просто запомните: все конкурсы и всегда будут проходить для 4
коммьюнити - латышского, литовского, эстонского и русскоязычного.
Таки образом я воссоздаю свой личный СССР
Шютка.

Subject:
International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Техника\Американская техника\Американская арта 7-8 уровня стала худшей в игре.
Link on message: #1247313
blwo_blwo, on 01 January 2012 - 09:34 AM, said: ... Жаль только вот сплеша больше нету.
...
blwo_blwo, on 01 January 2012 - 09:34 AM, said: Еще с ЗБТ арту только нерфили-нерфили-нерфили а она
нагибала-нагибает-будет нагибать 

Link on message: #1247313


OldFox: Неправда, сплеш есть.


OldFox: Я чувствую, что будет ап. В канале WG РУ-сервера, где были и лидеры
супер-теста, и СерБ, и ВК, я предложил любому поспорить на бутылку
Хеннесси ХО, что в течение полугода будет ап арты. Никто не стал
спорить.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Do you want overlord’s blog back?
Link on message: #1246560
PAKFA, on 01 January 2012 - 04:51 PM, said: @ Overlord: I hope this is one poll that you won't miss because you
can clearly see that thee are more people who like and appreciate
what you do for the community than those who don't.

Link on message: #1246560

Overlord: Not that many votes, but, yeah, basically it confirms that.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Do you want overlord’s blog back?
Link on message: #1246553
FrostDX, on 01 January 2012 - 12:03 PM, said: ...
So please vote to see if he is right (nobody likes him, beside few exceptions), then I will ask mods to delete (or at least lock) tread before he sees it so that he doesn’t get demoralised further, or is he wrong (people actually appreciate his work) and then maybe we will cheer him up, it’s New Year aftherall.

Link on message: #1246553

So please vote to see if he is right (nobody likes him, beside few exceptions), then I will ask mods to delete (or at least lock) tread before he sees it so that he doesn’t get demoralised further, or is he wrong (people actually appreciate his work) and then maybe we will cheer him up, it’s New Year aftherall.

Overlord: Thanks for the support, everyone.
And happy new year!
And happy new year!

Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1246542
skaerials, on 01 January 2012 - 09:22 PM, said: Q.1 Does the M103 have 6 crew members like the T34 i have now
Q.2 Does the T110 have 6 crew members like the T30 now
Q.3 I believe you stated before it was 5 crew and 4 crew i don't want to lose any of my crew that i now have 3 extra skills for!
Q.4 Should everyone just remove there crews from tank and place in barracks if were gonna lose crew members?

Link on message: #1246542

Q.2 Does the T110 have 6 crew members like the T30 now
Q.3 I believe you stated before it was 5 crew and 4 crew i don't want to lose any of my crew that i now have 3 extra skills for!
Q.4 Should everyone just remove there crews from tank and place in barracks if were gonna lose crew members?
Overlord: 1-2. Both have crews of 4 as far as I remember.
3-4. Don't do anything about it right away. We will publish the procedure in advance.
3-4. Don't do anything about it right away. We will publish the procedure in advance.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1246531
KuroNyra, on 01 January 2012 - 09:16 PM, said: I've recently heard that some new premium will come on a future
patch.
The T34 premium, the IS-6, and the Jadgitger.
Is the IS-6 will be a damage dealer, or something else? Could you answer that.
And are you going to modify the armor of the Jagdtiger Premium? Is front armor look too resistant for a tier 8. Are you going to balance that with a weak gun or speed?
Another question: Overlord, have you an approximative date for the release of the 7.1? In one or two week? Or are you keeping the secret?
(sorry for my english. It's not my native language. :s )

Link on message: #1246531

The T34 premium, the IS-6, and the Jadgitger.
Is the IS-6 will be a damage dealer, or something else? Could you answer that.
And are you going to modify the armor of the Jagdtiger Premium? Is front armor look too resistant for a tier 8. Are you going to balance that with a weak gun or speed?
Another question: Overlord, have you an approximative date for the release of the 7.1? In one or two week? Or are you keeping the secret?
(sorry for my english. It's not my native language. :s )
Overlord: 1. I would expect IS-6 to be somewhere between Loewe and KV-5 in
terms of armour and armament. Better gun than KV-5 has, and better
armour than Loeve.
2. It's unlikely that we would change the armour of JT with 88mm. Will use other parameters to adjust it for tier 8.
3. Yes, I have one, but better not to give it to public. Sorry.
(same here. so no worries)
2. It's unlikely that we would change the armour of JT with 88mm. Will use other parameters to adjust it for tier 8.
3. Yes, I have one, but better not to give it to public. Sorry.
(same here. so no worries)
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1246504
Orkel2, on 01 January 2012 - 08:59 PM, said: Overlord, when can we expect a new "You Ask, We Reply" article?

Link on message: #1246504

Overlord: "When" is not my type of question.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1246494
VeyronS, on 01 January 2012 - 06:04 PM, said: Is there any chance for clanwars to be back before 7.1 update? (or
anything more precise than later)
Thank you.

Link on message: #1246494

Thank you.
Overlord: The extenstion of this holiday break is caused by technical issues
between client - web synchronization which popped up in 7.0. They
need to be sorted out before CWs resume.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1246489
FrostDX, on 01 January 2012 - 05:26 PM, said: Sorry to repeat already asked question/discuss developers answer,
but I think you were wrong about it - he isn't an exception, and to
prove my theory that people actually like you I've made a pool
about it:
http://forum.worldof...77#entry1244777
But to sum it up:
>60% people have positive opinion of you, while only about 10% have negative opinion, the rest is neutral.
>80% people miss your blog, while only 2,5% of them admitted that they miss you so that then can ask stupid questions, troll etc.
- rating your blog from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), almost 40% votes went to "5" and ~35% went to "4" ("1"&"3" had about 10% each, while "2" had less than 5%)
So all in all, you weren't doing a bad job at all, and people actually liked it, but those who are unhappy about something are always louder than those who are happy/content.

Link on message: #1246489

http://forum.worldof...77#entry1244777
But to sum it up:
>60% people have positive opinion of you, while only about 10% have negative opinion, the rest is neutral.
>80% people miss your blog, while only 2,5% of them admitted that they miss you so that then can ask stupid questions, troll etc.
- rating your blog from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), almost 40% votes went to "5" and ~35% went to "4" ("1"&"3" had about 10% each, while "2" had less than 5%)
So all in all, you weren't doing a bad job at all, and people actually liked it, but those who are unhappy about something are always louder than those who are happy/content.

Overlord: But to sum it up:
>60% people have positive opinion of you, while only about 10% have negative opinion, the rest is neutral.
>80% people miss your blog, while only 2,5% of them admitted that they miss you so that then can ask stupid questions, troll etc.
- rating your blog from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), almost 40% votes went to "5" and ~35% went to "4" ("1"&"3" had about 10% each, while "2" had less than 5%)
So all in all, you weren't doing a bad job at all, and people actually liked it, but those who are unhappy about something are always louder than those who are happy/content.
Ok, the truth is on your side. I do agree.
>60% people have positive opinion of you, while only about 10% have negative opinion, the rest is neutral.
>80% people miss your blog, while only 2,5% of them admitted that they miss you so that then can ask stupid questions, troll etc.
- rating your blog from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), almost 40% votes went to "5" and ~35% went to "4" ("1"&"3" had about 10% each, while "2" had less than 5%)
So all in all, you weren't doing a bad job at all, and people actually liked it, but those who are unhappy about something are always louder than those who are happy/content.

Ok, the truth is on your side. I do agree.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #1246479
Tyria, on 01 January 2012 - 01:05 PM, said: Thx. In that case it might be a simple coincidence that T5 light
tanks get in much lower T battles than before.
Do you log the average tier of tanks in battles and make statistics about it
- per tank like T50-2
- per class like T5 light tank
or do you only calculate the win/loss ratio for a tank and then eventually adjust the tank?

Link on message: #1246479

Do you log the average tier of tanks in battles and make statistics about it
- per tank like T50-2
- per class like T5 light tank
or do you only calculate the win/loss ratio for a tank and then eventually adjust the tank?
Overlord: We are accumulating lots of figures. Haven't noticed anything
unusual about T-50-2 since 7.0.
Реклама | Adv