Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

EU Questions & Answers

Дата: 02.01.2012 16:12:30
View PostKuroNyra, on 02 January 2012 - 10:11 AM, said: The 8.8 KwK L71 and the 8.8 PaK L71 have seen the ratio of damage done at 240 at the 7.0.
The problem is that this two gun's are using the same shell of the L56 version for TD and Tank who are still at 220 instead of 240(PaK for TD and KwK for Tank)
Sow why the damaged done is different?
This isn't logical. The shell are the same, the only difference is the penetration. And we all know that for exemple that the Jadgpanzer IV is underpowerful vs the Slugger/Jackson and the SU-100.
For a lot of player's, the non increased for the L56 isn't fair.
Are you going to fix that problem?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Now the Stug III got the same armor of the Jadgpanzer IV who got the same armor of the Jadgpanther. Will you buff the armor of the Jadgpanther in another patch?
80mm. Even M4 Sherman and Panze IV laugh't of the Jadgpanther. And the quantity of HP for the Jadgpnther isn't enought for balance that. Unlike the Panzer VI Tiger

Overlord: 1. The damage increase was needed for balancing purposes. Not planning to do the same for L56 guns.
2. No, balance-wise JP is ok.

Реклама | Adv