EU Questions & Answers
Дата: 03.01.2012 14:56:19

You mention historic reasons for T-95 Buff, but why are nearly all german tanks far too slow.
1 Question, Why German vehicles have wrong speed and armour??
Tiger II 38km/h (real) vs. 28 km/h (wot)?
Tiger I 38 km/h (real) vs. 34 km/h (wot)?
Panzer II 55 km/h (real) vs. 40 km/h (wot)?
JT 38km/h (real) vs. 27km/h (Wot)? Armour - hull 150, 40, lower hull 100, 40 ?? values ??
Mause - dawn hull should have 300 mm armour, http://forum.worldof...and-schematics/ -> post 19. Why Mause dont have this armour tickness values ??
on the other hand:
1 Why Soviet tanks have no historic spped and armour ??
KV-13 51 km/h (real) vs. 60 km/h (wot)?
T-28 37 km/h (real) vs. 45 km/h (wot)?
t-54 - have 99 armour on front hull - look - >Armour 203 mm turret, 99 mm hull, LOS = ~200 mm?? Why armour is incorrect ?? - I have this information from Site, where t54 is described
Overlord, you mention that you stick historic reason, so pleas, tell US all, WHY German tanks, TD don't have historic Speed and Armour ETC ??
Last Question, Why tanks with 2 loaders, dont reload GUN faster?????
Overlord: 1-2. Covered many times already. Won't go back to it once
again.
3. RoF is tailored mostly according to balance needs, while crew sizes are usually historically correct.
3. RoF is tailored mostly according to balance needs, while crew sizes are usually historically correct.
