Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 18:44:16
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2285159
Adan_Russ, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:42, said: Valter, BTW. Why players on russian server can buy american
beta-testers prem M4A2E4, and we cannot buy russian KV-220, famous
"rozetka"? 
This is not fair!
(P.S. Привет Блэки;-)
Link on message: #2285159
Adan_Russ, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:42, said: Valter, BTW. Why players on russian server can buy american
beta-testers prem M4A2E4, and we cannot buy russian KV-220, famous
"rozetka"? This is not fair!
(P.S. Привет Блэки;-)Vallter:
Becase KV-220 is rather a boring vehicle in comparison with western CBT tank.
(А вы, собственно, кто? -) )
Becase KV-220 is rather a boring vehicle in comparison with western CBT tank.
(А вы, собственно, кто? -) )
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 18:44:16
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2285159
Adan_Russ, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:42, said: Valter, BTW. Why players on russian server can buy american
beta-testers prem M4A2E4, and we cannot buy russian KV-220, famous
"rozetka"? This is not fair!
(P.S. Привет Блэки;-)
Link on message: #2285159
Adan_Russ, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:42, said: Valter, BTW. Why players on russian server can buy american
beta-testers prem M4A2E4, and we cannot buy russian KV-220, famous
"rozetka"? This is not fair!
(P.S. Привет Блэки;-)Vallter:
Becase KV-220 is rather a boring vehicle in comparison with western CBT tank.
(А вы, собственно, кто? -) )
Becase KV-220 is rather a boring vehicle in comparison with western CBT tank.
(А вы, собственно, кто? -) )
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 18:42:35
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2285149
Striker_002, on Jul 19 2012 - 17:41, said: I'm curious on what the justification is for the removla.
The type-59 became overpopulated, and the german low tier premiums got removed because the french line came with the proper versions of the tanks...
The KV-5 doesn't fall into either of those categories.
Link on message: #2285149
Striker_002, on Jul 19 2012 - 17:41, said: I'm curious on what the justification is for the removla.The type-59 became overpopulated, and the german low tier premiums got removed because the french line came with the proper versions of the tanks...
The KV-5 doesn't fall into either of those categories.
Vallter: We do not longer see it in-game as regular premium vehicle, since
we added and will add a divercity of others. But we won't to keep
it as a 'special proposal' vehicle
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 18:42:35
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2285149
Striker_002, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:41, said: I'm curious on what the justification is for the removla.
The type-59 became overpopulated, and the german low tier premiums got removed because the french line came with the proper versions of the tanks...
The KV-5 doesn't fall into either of those categories.
Link on message: #2285149
Striker_002, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:41, said: I'm curious on what the justification is for the removla.The type-59 became overpopulated, and the german low tier premiums got removed because the french line came with the proper versions of the tanks...
The KV-5 doesn't fall into either of those categories.
Vallter:
We do not longer see it in-game as regular premium vehicle, since we added and will add a divercity of others. But we won't to keep it as a 'special proposal' vehicle
We do not longer see it in-game as regular premium vehicle, since we added and will add a divercity of others. But we won't to keep it as a 'special proposal' vehicle
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 18:42:35
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2285149
Striker_002, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:41, said: I'm curious on what the justification is for the removla.
The type-59 became overpopulated, and the german low tier premiums got removed because the french line came with the proper versions of the tanks...
The KV-5 doesn't fall into either of those categories.
Link on message: #2285149
Striker_002, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:41, said: I'm curious on what the justification is for the removla.The type-59 became overpopulated, and the german low tier premiums got removed because the french line came with the proper versions of the tanks...
The KV-5 doesn't fall into either of those categories.
Vallter:
We do not longer see it in-game as regular premium vehicle, since we added and will add a divercity of others. But we won't to keep it as a 'special proposal' vehicle
We do not longer see it in-game as regular premium vehicle, since we added and will add a divercity of others. But we won't to keep it as a 'special proposal' vehicle
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:35:08
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285101
Yankee, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:51, said: Panzacs must be very happy right now. The reason to make the switch
so quickly is apparant now.
Link on message: #2285101
Yankee, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:51, said: Panzacs must be very happy right now. The reason to make the switch
so quickly is apparant now.Vallter: Ural Steel was a Top Secret till today. So I doubt it.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:35:08
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285101
Yankee, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:51, said: Panzacs must be very happy right now. The reason to make the switch
so quickly is apparant now.
Link on message: #2285101
Yankee, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:51, said: Panzacs must be very happy right now. The reason to make the switch
so quickly is apparant now.Vallter:
Ural Steel was a Top Secret till today. So I doubt it.
Ural Steel was a Top Secret till today. So I doubt it.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:35:08
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285101
Yankee, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:51, said: Panzacs must be very happy right now. The reason to make the switch
so quickly is apparant now.
Link on message: #2285101
Yankee, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:51, said: Panzacs must be very happy right now. The reason to make the switch
so quickly is apparant now.Vallter:
Ural Steel was a Top Secret till today. So I doubt it.
Ural Steel was a Top Secret till today. So I doubt it.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:31:09
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285079
ed_anger, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:01, said: im surprised its not 8 RU teams if EU and NA have 4 (considering
last Ural Steel)
holakc, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:22, said: i was surprised that the Chinese's Server and the Vietnamese's
server are sending teams to this tournament too (i dont say that is
not right, i am just surprised)
since there is no much info aviable about those (Chinese's server and Vietnamese's servers. (unlike NA, RU, SEA and EU, because we are very familiar with those)
those server arent even mentioned at the wotWiki because are run by other company.
Link on message: #2285079
ed_anger, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:01, said: im surprised its not 8 RU teams if EU and NA have 4 (considering
last Ural Steel)Vallter: NA and EU have grown since last Ural Steel-)
holakc, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:22, said: i was surprised that the Chinese's Server and the Vietnamese's
server are sending teams to this tournament too (i dont say that is
not right, i am just surprised)since there is no much info aviable about those (Chinese's server and Vietnamese's servers. (unlike NA, RU, SEA and EU, because we are very familiar with those)
those server arent even mentioned at the wotWiki because are run by other company.
Vallter: Though operated by other company they still play our game and we
are their developers -) Aside of that they have really good
players. Chinese team have played in cross-border tournament with
top RU team and have actually managed to surprise them!
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:31:09
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285079
ed_anger, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:01, said: im surprised its not 8 RU teams if EU and NA have 4 (considering
last Ural Steel)
holakc, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:22, said: i was surprised that the Chinese's Server and the Vietnamese's
server are sending teams to this tournament too (i dont say that is
not right, i am just surprised)
since there is no much info aviable about those (Chinese's server and Vietnamese's servers. (unlike NA, RU, SEA and EU, because we are very familiar with those)
those server arent even mentioned at the wotWiki because are run by other company.
Link on message: #2285079
ed_anger, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:01, said: im surprised its not 8 RU teams if EU and NA have 4 (considering
last Ural Steel)Vallter:
NA and EU have grown since last Ural Steel-)
NA and EU have grown since last Ural Steel-)
holakc, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:22, said: i was surprised that the Chinese's Server and the Vietnamese's
server are sending teams to this tournament too (i dont say that is
not right, i am just surprised)since there is no much info aviable about those (Chinese's server and Vietnamese's servers. (unlike NA, RU, SEA and EU, because we are very familiar with those)
those server arent even mentioned at the wotWiki because are run by other company.
Vallter:
Though operated by other company they still play our game and we are their developers -) Aside of that they have really good players. Chinese team have played in cross-border tournament with top RU team and have actually managed to surprise them!
Though operated by other company they still play our game and we are their developers -) Aside of that they have really good players. Chinese team have played in cross-border tournament with top RU team and have actually managed to surprise them!
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:31:09
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285079
ed_anger, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:01, said: im surprised its not 8 RU teams if EU and NA have 4 (considering
last Ural Steel)
holakc, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:22, said: i was surprised that the Chinese's Server and the Vietnamese's
server are sending teams to this tournament too (i dont say that is
not right, i am just surprised)
since there is no much info aviable about those (Chinese's server and Vietnamese's servers. (unlike NA, RU, SEA and EU, because we are very familiar with those)
those server arent even mentioned at the wotWiki because are run by other company.
Link on message: #2285079
ed_anger, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:01, said: im surprised its not 8 RU teams if EU and NA have 4 (considering
last Ural Steel)Vallter:
NA and EU have grown since last Ural Steel-)
NA and EU have grown since last Ural Steel-)
holakc, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:22, said: i was surprised that the Chinese's Server and the Vietnamese's
server are sending teams to this tournament too (i dont say that is
not right, i am just surprised)since there is no much info aviable about those (Chinese's server and Vietnamese's servers. (unlike NA, RU, SEA and EU, because we are very familiar with those)
those server arent even mentioned at the wotWiki because are run by other company.
Vallter:
Though operated by other company they still play our game and we are their developers -) Aside of that they have really good players. Chinese team have played in cross-border tournament with top RU team and have actually managed to surprise them!
Though operated by other company they still play our game and we are their developers -) Aside of that they have really good players. Chinese team have played in cross-border tournament with top RU team and have actually managed to surprise them!
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:28:47
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285061
Conflict, on Jul 19 2012 - 17:07, said: I was in the 1st Ural Steel tourny, it started all of this.
F clan wars. Let's do this.
edit: I hope it's better managed.
Link on message: #2285061
Conflict, on Jul 19 2012 - 17:07, said: I was in the 1st Ural Steel tourny, it started all of this.F clan wars. Let's do this.
edit: I hope it's better managed.
Vallter: We learnt our lessons from the last one -)
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:28:47
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285061
Conflict, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:07, said: I was in the 1st Ural Steel tourny, it started all of this.
F clan wars. Let's do this.
edit: I hope it's better managed.
Link on message: #2285061
Conflict, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:07, said: I was in the 1st Ural Steel tourny, it started all of this.F clan wars. Let's do this.
edit: I hope it's better managed.
Vallter:
We learnt our lessons from the last one -)
We learnt our lessons from the last one -)
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 18:28:47
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2285061
Conflict, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:07, said: I was in the 1st Ural Steel tourny, it started all of this.
F clan wars. Let's do this.
edit: I hope it's better managed.
Link on message: #2285061
Conflict, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:07, said: I was in the 1st Ural Steel tourny, it started all of this.F clan wars. Let's do this.
edit: I hope it's better managed.
Vallter:
We learnt our lessons from the last one -)
We learnt our lessons from the last one -)
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 18:27:30
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2285056
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 17:11, said: By the way, personal note to Vallter... I really appreciate your
participation in these threads. And like your presentation. I just
wish you'd be around more often...
We here on the NA server are in DIRE need of more direct communication with the head office...
Link on message: #2285056
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 17:11, said: By the way, personal note to Vallter... I really appreciate your
participation in these threads. And like your presentation. I just
wish you'd be around more often...We here on the NA server are in DIRE need of more direct communication with the head office...
Vallter: NA office does a good job and they really voice your opinion in
Minsk. MM change is something specifically they pushed.-) I'm just
here, because they are asleep now due to time difference. I'm sure
that if they would be here, the would do much better than me-)
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 18:27:30
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2285056
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:11, said: By the way, personal note to Vallter... I really appreciate your
participation in these threads. And like your presentation. I just
wish you'd be around more often...
We here on the NA server are in DIRE need of more direct communication with the head office...
Link on message: #2285056
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:11, said: By the way, personal note to Vallter... I really appreciate your
participation in these threads. And like your presentation. I just
wish you'd be around more often...We here on the NA server are in DIRE need of more direct communication with the head office...
Vallter: NA office does a good job and they really voice your opinion in
Minsk. MM change is something specifically they pushed.-) I'm just
here, because they are asleep now due to time difference. I'm sure
that if they would be here, the would do much better than me-)
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 18:27:30
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2285056
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:11, said: By the way, personal note to Vallter... I really appreciate your
participation in these threads. And like your presentation. I just
wish you'd be around more often...
We here on the NA server are in DIRE need of more direct communication with the head office...
Link on message: #2285056
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 16:11, said: By the way, personal note to Vallter... I really appreciate your
participation in these threads. And like your presentation. I just
wish you'd be around more often...We here on the NA server are in DIRE need of more direct communication with the head office...
Vallter: NA office does a good job and they really voice your opinion in
Minsk. MM change is something specifically they pushed.-) I'm just
here, because they are asleep now due to time difference. I'm sure
that if they would be here, the would do much better than me-)
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 16:34:27
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2284406
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:33, said: 4 teams allowed from this server.
Link on message: #2284406
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:33, said: 4 teams allowed from this server.Vallter: 4 best Teams will go to Moscow. There is no limit for registration.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 16:34:27
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2284406
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:33, said: 4 teams allowed from this server.
Link on message: #2284406
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:33, said: 4 teams allowed from this server.Vallter:
4 best Teams will go to Moscow. There is no limit for registration.
4 best Teams will go to Moscow. There is no limit for registration.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 16:34:27
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2284406
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:33, said: 4 teams allowed from this server.
Link on message: #2284406
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:33, said: 4 teams allowed from this server.Vallter:
4 best Teams will go to Moscow. There is no limit for registration.
4 best Teams will go to Moscow. There is no limit for registration.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 16:33:37
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2284404
CptBlood, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:32, said: Is there a team limit?
Link on message: #2284404
CptBlood, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:32, said: Is there a team limit?Vallter: AFAIK, there are no such limits.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 16:33:37
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2284404
CptBlood, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:32, said: Is there a team limit?
Link on message: #2284404
CptBlood, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:32, said: Is there a team limit?Vallter:
AFAIK, there are no such limits.
AFAIK, there are no such limits.
Vallter
Ural Steel 2012
19.07.2012 16:33:37
Subject: Ural Steel 2012
Link on message: #2284404
CptBlood, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:32, said: Is there a team limit?
Link on message: #2284404
CptBlood, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:32, said: Is there a team limit?Vallter:
AFAIK, there are no such limits.
AFAIK, there are no such limits.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 16:17:59
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284330
Arphila, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:15, said: 
Taken from another thread. The turret armor used to 279, now it's 178.
Link on message: #2284330
Arphila, on Jul 19 2012 - 15:15, said: Taken from another thread. The turret armor used to 279, now it's 178.
Vallter: Do not worry, it should be a description glitch, which will be
fixed in release version.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 16:17:59
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284330
Arphila, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:15, said: http://img7.imagesha...2/shot004wl.jpg
Taken from another thread. The turret armor used to 279, now it's 178.
Link on message: #2284330
Arphila, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:15, said: http://img7.imagesha...2/shot004wl.jpgTaken from another thread. The turret armor used to 279, now it's 178.
Vallter: Do not worry, it should be a description glitch, which will be
fixed in release version.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 16:17:59
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284330
Arphila, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:15, said: http://img7.imagesha...2/shot004wl.jpg
Taken from another thread. The turret armor used to 279, now it's 178.
Link on message: #2284330
Arphila, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:15, said: http://img7.imagesha...2/shot004wl.jpgTaken from another thread. The turret armor used to 279, now it's 178.
Vallter: Do not worry, it should be a description glitch, which will be
fixed in release version.
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 16:10:21
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2284306
Link on message: #2284306
Vallter: The Premium KV-5 Heavy Tank will be removed from the World of Tanks
in-game store!
Back to the article
Back to the article
Vallter
Changes to the in-game shop
19.07.2012 16:10:21
Subject: Changes to the in-game shop
Link on message: #2284306
Link on message: #2284306
Vallter: The Premium KV-5 Heavy Tank will be removed from the World of Tanks
in-game store!
Back to the article
Back to the article
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 16:03:22
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284291
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:45, said: So to confirm, no changes were made to the front machine gun turret
"weak point", right?
EinstZecksclaw, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:50, said: I thought that premium vehicles are immune to buff and nerf???
They buff the KV5 and nerf the T34????
Link on message: #2284291
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:45, said: So to confirm, no changes were made to the front machine gun turret
"weak point", right?Vallter: Nope, it was not.
EinstZecksclaw, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:50, said: I thought that premium vehicles are immune to buff and nerf???They buff the KV5 and nerf the T34????
Vallter: T34 received no changes.
KV-5 receive the buff because he started facing T9 Mediums.
KV-5 receive the buff because he started facing T9 Mediums.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 16:03:22
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284291
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:45, said: So to confirm, no changes were made to the front machine gun turret
"weak point", right?
EinstZecksclaw, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:50, said: I thought that premium vehicles are immune to buff and nerf???
They buff the KV5 and nerf the T34????
Link on message: #2284291
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:45, said: So to confirm, no changes were made to the front machine gun turret
"weak point", right?Vallter: Nope, it was not.
EinstZecksclaw, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:50, said: I thought that premium vehicles are immune to buff and nerf???They buff the KV5 and nerf the T34????
Vallter: T34 received no changes.
KV-5 receive the buff because he started facing T9 Mediums.
KV-5 receive the buff because he started facing T9 Mediums.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 16:03:22
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284291
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:45, said: So to confirm, no changes were made to the front machine gun turret
"weak point", right?
EinstZecksclaw, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:50, said: I thought that premium vehicles are immune to buff and nerf???
They buff the KV5 and nerf the T34????
Link on message: #2284291
xamdam, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:45, said: So to confirm, no changes were made to the front machine gun turret
"weak point", right?Vallter: Nope, it was not.
EinstZecksclaw, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:50, said: I thought that premium vehicles are immune to buff and nerf???They buff the KV5 and nerf the T34????
Vallter: T34 received no changes.
KV-5 receive the buff because he started facing T9 Mediums.
KV-5 receive the buff because he started facing T9 Mediums.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 15:28:24
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284181
jncjr232, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:07, said: not my question at all. Why is the exp from a elite Ferdinand to
the Jagdtiger for?
Link on message: #2284181
jncjr232, on Jul 19 2012 - 14:07, said: not my question at all. Why is the exp from a elite Ferdinand to
the Jagdtiger for?Vallter: Because player thought that E-100 TD will be available for research
after the Ferdinand, as we announced it a year ago. Now things
changed and we transferred the XP basing on feedback we received
from players.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 15:28:24
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284181
jncjr232, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:07, said: not my question at all. Why is the exp from a elite Ferdinand to
the Jagdtiger for?
Link on message: #2284181
jncjr232, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:07, said: not my question at all. Why is the exp from a elite Ferdinand to
the Jagdtiger for?Vallter:
Because player thought that E-100 TD will be available for research after the Ferdinand, as we announced it a year ago. Now things changed and we transferred the XP basing on feedback we received from players.
Because player thought that E-100 TD will be available for research after the Ferdinand, as we announced it a year ago. Now things changed and we transferred the XP basing on feedback we received from players.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 15:28:24
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284181
jncjr232, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:07, said: not my question at all. Why is the exp from a elite Ferdinand to
the Jagdtiger for?
Link on message: #2284181
jncjr232, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:07, said: not my question at all. Why is the exp from a elite Ferdinand to
the Jagdtiger for?Vallter:
Because player thought that E-100 TD will be available for research after the Ferdinand, as we announced it a year ago. Now things changed and we transferred the XP basing on feedback we received from players.
Because player thought that E-100 TD will be available for research after the Ferdinand, as we announced it a year ago. Now things changed and we transferred the XP basing on feedback we received from players.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 15:27:02
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284173
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:34, said: Set tank locking time on global map for all new vehicles added in
the 7.5 update.
Is this another ninja attempt to give us tank locking?
MrCabinetry, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:49, said: List of changes between first and second iterations of public
test:
Added some improvements to the KV-5’s characteristics.
This is all I read in the notes, I saw no mention that the Game Economy of the KV5 was being nerfed or buffed.
I wish the Dev's were more specific as to what improvements are being made to the KV5. I hope they're improving the gun to 107 mm ZiS-24, this would at the least give the KV5 some balls in terms of fire power given it's tier level vs other tanks in it's tier. And NO, it would not make it an OP Premium tank since the gun is still a 107mm.
Link on message: #2284173
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:34, said: Set tank locking time on global map for all new vehicles added in
the 7.5 update.Is this another ninja attempt to give us tank locking?
Vallter: Nope, just a part of update note for EU slipped to NA. I've double
checked this with Developers and QA - no 'Tank Locking' for NA in
7.5
MrCabinetry, on Jul 19 2012 - 13:49, said: List of changes between first and second iterations of public
test:Added some improvements to the KV-5’s characteristics.
This is all I read in the notes, I saw no mention that the Game Economy of the KV5 was being nerfed or buffed.
I wish the Dev's were more specific as to what improvements are being made to the KV5. I hope they're improving the gun to 107 mm ZiS-24, this would at the least give the KV5 some balls in terms of fire power given it's tier level vs other tanks in it's tier. And NO, it would not make it an OP Premium tank since the gun is still a 107mm.
Vallter: Slightly buff turret turning speed;
Increase durability on 100 HP (as we've done with KV-4);
Slightly reduced influence of tank movement on gun dispersion.
Increase durability on 100 HP (as we've done with KV-4);
Slightly reduced influence of tank movement on gun dispersion.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 15:27:02
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284173
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:34, said: Set tank locking time on global map for all new vehicles added in
the 7.5 update.
Is this another ninja attempt to give us tank locking?
MrCabinetry, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:49, said: List of changes between first and second iterations of public
test:
Added some improvements to the KV-5’s characteristics.
This is all I read in the notes, I saw no mention that the Game Economy of the KV5 was being nerfed or buffed.
I wish the Dev's were more specific as to what improvements are being made to the KV5. I hope they're improving the gun to 107 mm ZiS-24, this would at the least give the KV5 some balls in terms of fire power given it's tier level vs other tanks in it's tier. And NO, it would not make it an OP Premium tank since the gun is still a 107mm.
Link on message: #2284173
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:34, said: Set tank locking time on global map for all new vehicles added in
the 7.5 update.Is this another ninja attempt to give us tank locking?
Vallter:
Nope, just a part of update note for EU slipped to NA. I've double checked this with Developers and QA - no 'Tank Locking' for NA in 7.5
Nope, just a part of update note for EU slipped to NA. I've double checked this with Developers and QA - no 'Tank Locking' for NA in 7.5
MrCabinetry, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:49, said: List of changes between first and second iterations of public
test:Added some improvements to the KV-5’s characteristics.
This is all I read in the notes, I saw no mention that the Game Economy of the KV5 was being nerfed or buffed.
I wish the Dev's were more specific as to what improvements are being made to the KV5. I hope they're improving the gun to 107 mm ZiS-24, this would at the least give the KV5 some balls in terms of fire power given it's tier level vs other tanks in it's tier. And NO, it would not make it an OP Premium tank since the gun is still a 107mm.
Vallter:
Slightly buff turret turning speed;
Increase durability on 100 HP (as we've done with KV-4);
Slightly reduced influence of tank movement on gun dispersion.
Slightly buff turret turning speed;
Increase durability on 100 HP (as we've done with KV-4);
Slightly reduced influence of tank movement on gun dispersion.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 15:27:02
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2284173
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:34, said: Set tank locking time on global map for all new vehicles added in
the 7.5 update.
Is this another ninja attempt to give us tank locking?
MrCabinetry, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:49, said: List of changes between first and second iterations of public
test:
Added some improvements to the KV-5’s characteristics.
This is all I read in the notes, I saw no mention that the Game Economy of the KV5 was being nerfed or buffed.
I wish the Dev's were more specific as to what improvements are being made to the KV5. I hope they're improving the gun to 107 mm ZiS-24, this would at the least give the KV5 some balls in terms of fire power given it's tier level vs other tanks in it's tier. And NO, it would not make it an OP Premium tank since the gun is still a 107mm.
Link on message: #2284173
SunFlash, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:34, said: Set tank locking time on global map for all new vehicles added in
the 7.5 update.Is this another ninja attempt to give us tank locking?
Vallter:
Nope, just a part of update note for EU slipped to NA. I've double checked this with Developers and QA - no 'Tank Locking' for NA in 7.5
Nope, just a part of update note for EU slipped to NA. I've double checked this with Developers and QA - no 'Tank Locking' for NA in 7.5
MrCabinetry, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:49, said: List of changes between first and second iterations of public
test:Added some improvements to the KV-5’s characteristics.
This is all I read in the notes, I saw no mention that the Game Economy of the KV5 was being nerfed or buffed.
I wish the Dev's were more specific as to what improvements are being made to the KV5. I hope they're improving the gun to 107 mm ZiS-24, this would at the least give the KV5 some balls in terms of fire power given it's tier level vs other tanks in it's tier. And NO, it would not make it an OP Premium tank since the gun is still a 107mm.
Vallter:
Slightly buff turret turning speed;
Increase durability on 100 HP (as we've done with KV-4);
Slightly reduced influence of tank movement on gun dispersion.
Slightly buff turret turning speed;
Increase durability on 100 HP (as we've done with KV-4);
Slightly reduced influence of tank movement on gun dispersion.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 14:05:40
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2283946
DentedBullet, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:58, said: Is there likely to be a 3rd test?
Link on message: #2283946
DentedBullet, on Jul 19 2012 - 12:58, said: Is there likely to be a 3rd test?Vallter: The second iteration will most likely last till 1st of August. And
most probably there won't be any 3rd iteration. Though for release
variant changes are still possible.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 14:05:40
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2283946
DentedBullet, on Jul 19 2012 - 11:58, said: Is there likely to be a 3rd test?
Link on message: #2283946
DentedBullet, on Jul 19 2012 - 11:58, said: Is there likely to be a 3rd test?Vallter:
The second iteration will most likely last till 1st of August. And most probably there won't be any 3rd iteration. Though for release variant changes are still possible.
The second iteration will most likely last till 1st of August. And most probably there won't be any 3rd iteration. Though for release variant changes are still possible.
Vallter
7.5 second mass test has started!
19.07.2012 14:05:40
Subject: 7.5 second mass test has started!
Link on message: #2283946
DentedBullet, on Jul 19 2012 - 11:58, said: Is there likely to be a 3rd test?
Link on message: #2283946
DentedBullet, on Jul 19 2012 - 11:58, said: Is there likely to be a 3rd test?Vallter:
The second iteration will most likely last till 1st of August. And most probably there won't be any 3rd iteration. Though for release variant changes are still possible.
The second iteration will most likely last till 1st of August. And most probably there won't be any 3rd iteration. Though for release variant changes are still possible.
Реклама | Adv