Developers posts on forum

Delhroh: Saludos a todos,   En primer lugar muchas gracias por vuestros comentarios y opiniones. Con respecto al tanque, parece que, sí, efectivamente se trata de un error y no es el Panther D, sino el A. La verdad es que he trabajado duramente en la colección, pero no he revisado los vehículos, y no hay duda que ese detalle se ha escapado. Os pedimos disculpas por las molestias que esto os pueda ocasionar y nos alegramos que compartáis con nostros vuestras valiosas opiniones para mejorar aún más la colección. Por su ojo de águila, le enviaré un mensaje privado a Khalkin con un código por su inestimable ayuda en este aspecto.    Con respecto a los códigos, sí, el primer código es solamente para cuentas nuevas pero habrá diferentes códigos para jugadores existentes a lo largo de la colección .   ¡Recordad que aún podéis participar y ganar una suscripción a la colección de WoT Salvat, además de varios vehículos premium!   Un saludo.  

parim1331:   Wszyscy czołgiści z zakładki "Rekruci" w koszarach nie znikają. Pozdrawiam.

Kayi4ek:   K otevření dalších misí. Podívej se například na podmínky 2. mise

thePhilX: Gibt es noch spezifisches Feedback zu bestimmten Teilen der Karte oder der Benutzbarkeit für bestimmte Panzerklasse (z.B. Mediums, Lights, Arty-Safe stehen .... ) ?

eekeeboo:   Each region has a different strategy for marketing and pace of discounts. There are still frequent levels on EU. 

eekeeboo: I was worried about the first few posts that people didn't take the time to read or understand what was being said.    Thankfully people are explaining the joke!    The Super-Pershing is still one of my favourite tanks that it's a simple mechanic to keep your front at the enemy, shoot back while you wiggle, farm the credits! Yes it's slow but it's more than able to hold its own in most engagements and I was able to farm credits like crazy in it. I also believe it was the first tank I got 3 moe when the MOE system had the requirements reduced. 

eekeeboo:   I tried that, you ignored it.   

eekeeboo:   Please take the time to read up the answers, explanations and reasoning and come back once again if you still agree if " no one from WG cares about us" or that people simply don't want to read things that they don't agree with. Then you'd realise nothing is copy and pasted other than the low effort replies you provide when I rely on you to do your own research because prior attempt to explain things to a person have failed due to the previous explanation.   

eekeeboo:   You can call it a failure but at the same time, the number of vehicles available will not be able to all be claimed by FAME or other of the top 10 clans, even if the top 20 clans all got a tank for every person that would still leave a large portion of the prize pool of vehicles still available.    I'm not sure on the technical victory issue, but I will pass on the feedback and ask the question. Hopefully, we'll be able to get feedback to you ASAP, you'll see from the ruleset provided yesterday that the formula and penalty system are intended to address this.     

eekeeboo:   Don't you just love the angry oiks who throw their toys out of the pram when the team utterly ignores their 'orders'   I've had many times where I've ended on my side within the first minute of the battle, have people drive by me and ignore me, then the same person ping and spam to report me for camping and not moving.... while i sit there with my limited arc of fire shooting until the very end  

eekeeboo: I'm happy for the discussion, please please leave out the elements discussing religion and obviously sensitive topics. That's why the rules are there to prevent such discussions! 

parim1331:  

parim1331:   Jeżeli stanie się inaczej to dobrowolnie poddam się deportacji na Sybir.

eekeeboo:   You can still play the content at any time you choose. For instance the content you complain about in the past is not locked. If you truly believe this, you've not played enough Free to play titles that practice this.  Once you read the full sentence you'll see I specifically stated regardless of strength you can still play it and still use it on current content. Not like having old tanks not able to play on new maps, or meet new tanks or use new physics etc.   

eekeeboo:   Feedback is helpful when constructive, feedback when it says "remove arty omg" is not feedback. If you read the forums long enough, you'll see what you get mostly in them. You will rarely have well thought out or informed feedback, you will mostly get subjective and "knee-jerk" feedback. With little to no objectivity. Once more you've not read what I've typed, unfortunately further illustrating the issue with the mindset and approach of people who visit the forums.    If you're not going to actually read what I type, complaining about not being listened to is somewhat ironic... in fact. It's the pure definition of ironic. 

eekeeboo:   And both will be subject to the same rules. Interpretation or not, unfortunately, people always find inventive ways to say "rules say it's OK" that's why you have the parts stating they will be updated at any time and that moderation has the final say. 

eekeeboo: I'm sorry to say there's no active discussion here, some remarks and some venting. But this is intended to discuss gameplay. I get we all get frustrated and need to vent, but this really isn't the place and we need to avoid the persistence of these threads popping up. It's essentially like someone announcing to you they're going to the bathroom, getting a coffee, stretching their legs or taking a break every time they stand up. 

eekeeboo:   Last attempt:  Clan Wars Campaign.  Clan Wars Season.  Please google both and come back to me.

Delhroh:   La primera entrega del Panther de la colección unicamente. Sí por desgracia, de momento, solamente conocemos las cuatro primeras entregas de la colección. 18:25 Added after 0 minutes

Delhroh:   Sí, hay recompensas a lo largo de la colección

eekeeboo: As per the OP point, thread closed, mystery solved. Time for World peace! 

eekeeboo:   Moderator is VERY different to Community Manager, this is a part of puzzle in gaming ecosystem it's important to learn the distinction of. Once you understand more of the processes of community work and how that affects development, you'll further understand the reason for what you call "mouthpiece of WG"... I'm a person representing WG to the players, putting a personality and getting information across, it's not like a Union that represents the workers, you didn't elect me. Like HR, they are always trying to help people enjoy their time, but they will always represent the interests of their employer as is their job.    The fact the changes are introduced the way they are vs the way people see would be "for the best of the game" should illustrate the way they are acted on. If they weren't looked at in a way that is a balance for the players and for the game you would never get balance changes, they would just be left to constantly encourage people to only got for the newest content and thus encourage more expense by players to earn the newer content. You will see this in many F2P titles where older content is completely irrelevant and I don't mean by it's slightly weaker, underpowered or difficult to play etc, but in that the content is no longer even remotely relevant and you can't access new content at all without paying.    The important thing with game and development models is that you will find, develop and evolve "best practice", this is how you will find and see trends in gaming. You will notice that with "dlc" and the shift you see there, the way you see the gaming industry as a whole evolve. You will see trends evolve for very specific reasons and there are many models of games that you can assess their success. The difficulty you have in finding a gap in the market is you're usually left alone in the models you can use, but benefit from being able to do things your own way without competition. It's all balance. Sorry I deviate a little, in this you will see best business practice and methods used across all society in keeping content relevant and engaging for players.    The example I gave for "everything for free" is just some of the views you will see popularly on the forums and community. The belief that Free-to-play actually means everything should be free without cost, that everything including premium content should be earnable. And an example of how expectations vs business and economic reality do not always match-up.    You say odd to raise, but when statements like... "There are comments all over the forums from everyone about x change they want". The general trap is that people don't come to the forums to say good things generally, it's mostly negative. Not everyone, but you will notice the trend. Like going to support... you don't go to support and say "Good job guys, keep up all the work you do to keep my game running smoothly".    There's a difference between listening and acting on things. I listen and read well, but it simply comes down to, you can listen to what someone says, it doesn't mean they are right. In this instance, when someone says "The game is dying because of balance". If you have the information that proves otherwise, it doesn't matter whether you listen or not, it doesn't make it true. Instead, I have to do things like listen to read and respond extensively with what I can to highlight... no, you're wrong. And by the fact I respond in length and extent should illustrate the listening, but for a lot of this thread, it's been a 1-way street when someone says "head in the sand" 4 times in response to information that counters it. There is a demand I listen as part of WG but that players don't need to listen when information and correction are given back.    Like the 2019 announcement. The decisions made that were praised by the same person who only 2 weeks prior said the game is dying. The actions being taken weren't taken based on the video, the decisions and planning and processes put in place for the changes coming in the next year are made months in advance. That should illustrate the quick turn around how much data analysis and listening takes place.    For the remark about regular spenders, the important with this despite all of the forumites combined, I can guarantee that there are more spenders who never visity the forums for a variety of reasons. Least of which is involved in the atmosphere that usually comes with forums.   

Delhroh:   Desde hoy mismo.

eekeeboo: Usually, encouraging teamplay can come from you.    Help the person on their side/roof. When someone pings for support, relocate and help them if it's safe to do so etc.    Never be afraid to say thank-you for the support and help and ask nicely. Doesn't always work, but you have to encourage it little by little. 

Delhroh:   Son 60 entregas en total.   

Delhroh:   Hay varios regalos a suscribirse como una camiseta y taza de WoT, un Sherman "Thunderbolt" escala 1/43, y un casco en miniatura americano de la Guerra de Vietnam.   Luego existe una llamada suscripción premium que incluye dos vehículos adicionales que no estarán disponibles de otra forma.   Un saludo.  

Delhroh:   Hubo una colección prevía de "prueba" de muy pocos ejemplares realizada por Salvat sin una promoción tan grande el año pasado en la que no colaboré... la prueba ha ido bien y ahora tenéis la colección completa, 60 números en total.  

Delhroh:   La colección es de un número cada 2 semanas, por lo que serían 40 euros cada mes.   Un saludo. 18:02 Added after 0 minutes

Delhroh:   El módo histórico fue un fiasco y no hay previsto que regrese a WoT. Camuflajes históricos, sí habrá más en el futuro.

eekeeboo: I would hope for obvious reasons, least of which... it's in the rules, ToS, and the EULA. You should be able to understand why.    People generally can't discuss these things without resorting to the age-old "I will win this debate by arguing, I will win this argument by being the loudest and using the most insulting words". 

eekeeboo: I try to read everything, but unfortunately, this is the nature of the test server, if you give people the tools to test things comprehensively, they will still try to draw a phallus on the map with gold rounds. 

eekeeboo: Just a heads up I edited the words to prevent any offense or abuse (I was ready to swing the hammer by the first sentence before I got through the rest of the post). Please feel free to change to something more "politically correct". I say this as I'm sure you are OK with this terminology but I've taught children and see the way this word affected them and would wish that on no one.    I can concur that a game is there to be enjoyed, but anyone who can access it, accessibility is just as important as high skill ceiling mechanics.    Just curious, have you tried giving your son a roll-up music keyboard.  ​

eekeeboo: Can't take advantage of mountain climbing if you're being bombarded by arty! 

eekeeboo: This I found to be a two-fold issue.    eliteism from 1 camp and an alien concept that being good at a game should be derided (for whatever reason you measure this).    WoT has been one of the few games where being good at the game opens you up to being insulted for such ability and performance, very few games I see this. I'm not talking re-rolls or padding etc but legitimately being good at the game is usually not well received and you can be insulted for playing well but not the way another person wants because of their ignorant (literal definition) knowledge of the game.    Just something to mull over why you see it. 

eekeeboo: Anything that's hit more than 3 times in a row without being spotted.... vengeful hatred will be exacted at all costs!   

eekeeboo: I'm still waiting for a clear and precise answer to this before I make a reply. I know something of this importance and magnitude it's better to get it right than be misquoted for years to come! 

eekeeboo: My approach to the theft of the spot:     

eekeeboo:   ​

eekeeboo:   Hint.... the parts that were changed and being tested? 

eekeeboo: Because if a replay is submitted by the person you can assess what THEY are doing wrong/could do better.    It's like you providing me a replay and how it's going to show me what I did wrong in a previous game. I hope you can see the flawed nature of that request.  ​

eekeeboo:   And a further example.... was it available to the general public or made available on any server other than Asia? 

eekeeboo:   ​Please look at what a campaign is, then look what a season is. Thank you for taking the time to learn the distinction and difference. 

eekeeboo:    The T-44-122 is still only available for testing accounts.  The problem with the ISU-130 is that it's had no availability at all on EU as far as I'm aware (I could be wrong). Though that can/may/will change, until that happens it's not possible to provide access to a tank that's not been sold or made to the player-base in general.    That's why in this case a pre-order vehicle is available. Hope that can illustrate some of the challenge and reasoning for that choice.  A lot of the other vehicles like those made available in the Advent calendar and festive offers were previously available at one point or another apart from perhaps the AX. 

eekeeboo:   ​I'm yet to find out if this is deliberate or not  

eekeeboo:   Trying to make a reaction without being too informative   

eekeeboo:   There's no gold farming involved here, you can earn yourself a reward tank too if you commit to earning one.   

eekeeboo:   ​Why did the AMX 40 cross the tracks?

eekeeboo:     This is a good point, but you can't make everything special, you quickly devalue the special, as can be seen from your comment. 

eekeeboo:     Stock crew, and the equipment and loadout you see resulted in this game:    You should be able to tell with my death I wasn't playing passively or in the back, I was getting stuck in and pushing the advantage. This is with no perk crew, no equipment and standard shell loadout. 

eekeeboo:   Data doesn't just mean damage and winrate. 

thePhilX: 1) bischen auf die Wortwahl achten!
2) ja, du kannst deine eigenen Punkte boosten, um noch mehr zu kriegen
3) für den Multiplikator zählt der Wert, der zum Schluss aufm Papier steht, nicht die Gesamtanzahl der Punkte, die du erhalten hast

thePhilX: 1) Die Stufen wurden so angepasst, dass alle Spielen einen Vorteil dadurch haben können
2) ja, alle Punkte können investiert werden und das natürlich auch mehrmals während des Events