Developers posts on forum

Subject: Připravte se na první ZK horečku letošního roku
Link on message: #16600538

Subject: Poznejte nový speciál „Na vrcholku stromu“
Link on message: #16600532

Ghostly3, on 29 January 2019 - 06:54 PM, said: No nelíbí se mi, že už nebudeme moci hlasovat, ale je pravda, že se hned hlasovalo pro největší jitrnici...  

Subject: Co se zlatem?
Link on message: #16600522

Krucifikator, on 29 January 2019 - 03:01 PM, said: Nevím, zda je na místě založit topic nebo private dotaz na Káju, ale třeba někdo tento "problém" sdílí. 

Mám po Vánocích dost zlata (30k+). Příští rok bych krabičky rád nakoupil znovu, ovšem jen když budu potřebovat goldy. 

Pokud je mi známo, vytáhnout z nás zlato jde:

Free Exp: Ten poměr mně i v akcí přijde škoda.
Přecvičení posádky na jiný tank: Nejsem profík, ale pro těch 10 bitev navíc mi za to opět nestojí.
Reset skill: Skilly plánuji od začátku na finální stav, použil jsem párkrát.
Přecvičení specializace: Prima funkce, ale použil jsem párkrát.
Sundávaní doplňků: 3000x za rok výbavu nesundám.
Nákup tanku vestromu: Ani ve slevě za výměnu.
PÚ: I s ročním mi stále spoustu přebývá.
Stříbro: toho mám spoustu.
Dekorace: Stálých kamufláží mám víc než tanků. Nápisy nepotřebuji
Zálohy: Nestíhám klikat ty co dostanu.


V tuto chvílí ho z mého pohledu nemám za co utratit a příští Vánoce tedy nebudu mít důvod automaty zkoušet. Pokud je nás takových víc, i WG se ochudí o zisk.


Kájo, jsem výjimka, či se plánuje tato situace nějak řešit? Pokud ano, můžeme vědět jak?

Pro mě by mělo smysl:
1) Přidat jiné (lepší/novější tanky trvale do stromu.
2) Akce typu advent. 
3) Možnost změnit národnost posádky.
4) Prémiový status tanku. Tzn možnost udělat si prémko z libovolného tanku.


Jinak nepíši neuváženě, ale již ze zkušenosti. Tyto Vánoce mi na konci roku zbylo půl roku prémka a 7k goldů. Teď mám 30k (-půl roku prémka jsem zapomněl doplnit v akci). Ale jednoduchou matikou mi na konci toho roku zbude citelně víc.


A OT nakonec. Někde jsem zaslechl, že půjdou za bony pořídit "odměnové" tanky i mimo klanové akce. Je to pravda? Pokud ano, bavíme se o tancích jako starý foch a hvězda? Nebo i 907 atp? 

Subject: WG nin Eklediği Botlar
Link on message: #16600457

creture, on 19 January 2019 - 11:47 PM, said: evet acıklamışlardı wg nin bazı eşleştirmelerde 00 777 nickli başındaki  "."  nickler wg nin ekledigi botlar acıklaması vardı resmi sitesinde ordan okumuştum.

Subject: 1 saat ban yedim
Link on message: #16600432

Subject: ¡Stream histórico el próximo martes 29 de enero con nuestros contributors!
Link on message: #16600427

Subject: Jak przerwać procedurę kasowania konta w WoT?
Link on message: #16600416

DAS_BOCHEN, on 27 January 2019 - 11:05 PM, said: Witam. Napisałem krytycznego maila do WG, dotyczącego bitew z wynikami 0-5:15. W odpowiedzi na to ...rozpoczęto proces kasowania mojego konta. Sam o to nie wnosiłem, dowiedziałem się o tym przypadkiem. Napisałem do supportu, ale tam bot wrzuca mi taka samą odpowiedź. Zawiera ona wzmiankę o możliwości przerwania procedury kasacji. Warunkiem tego jest zalogowanie na stronę wargaming.net, zaakceptowanie "umowy licencyjnej użytkownika końcowego" i "polityki prywatności" oraz kliknięcie "przywróć konto". Na razie znalazłem tylko to http://legal.eu.warg...nika-koncowego/ i to http://legal.eu.warg...-plikow-cookie/ . Problem w tym, że nie ma tam miejsca do postawienia "ptaszka" oznaczającego akceptację. Jedyne takie miejsca, które kojarzę, znajdowały się na początku instalacji gry. Mam ją reinstalować? Ktoś coś wie? Z góry dziękuję i pozdrawiam,

Subject: The Soldiers of Fortune join the Global Map
Link on message: #16600399

Subject: Chat Maintenance 30/01
Link on message: #16600222

Long_Range_Sniper, on 29 January 2019 - 05:07 PM, said:   Having experienced previous "maintenance", do you think that period might be a little longer?   PS:      

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16600206

Remarius, on 29 January 2019 - 05:05 PM, said: Because large parts of the community voted for already popular vehicles that they already owned, most of the benefits of the Top of the Tree special were lost. Consequently, we will choose the Top of the Tree vehicle for each month from now on so more players can profit from the discounts and missions.   Wait, you're reducing interaction with the community and that's good?

Subject: Chat Maintenance 30/01
Link on message: #16600198

Subject: Poznejte nový speciál „Na vrcholku stromu“
Link on message: #16600188

Karaya12, on 29 January 2019 - 05:34 PM, said: Tak pokud by se důsledně projely všechny linie, tak by rozložení tanků bylo dokonalé i při ponechání hlasování. Mohu se zeptat na jakou dobu plánujete zachovat tuto koncepci ? Pokud jsem v rychlosti správně počítal, tak ve hře je 52 tanků tieru deset. Nečekám že tento model pojede pět let a tak by mě zajímalo podle jakého klíče budete vybírat stroje do speciálu. Budete pravidelně střídat druhy tanků a hlavně národy ?  EDIT: Ty nové mise a bonusy vypadají zajímavě 

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16600184

lkstamenov, on 29 January 2019 - 04:22 PM, said:   When its time to vote for ToT is it possible to have all lines available not just 4-5 lines. Line with most votes win even if this is the current month ToT   How does that sound ?   Tnx WG

Subject: Oto nowy Wierzchołek drzewa
Link on message: #16600117

Msciboj, on 29 January 2019 - 05:25 PM, said:   World of premium tanks probuje przypomniec graczom o grindzie pojazdow drzewkowych. Dobre bonusy i az jestem ciekawy jakie szroty dadza na poczatek. Ogolnie duzy plus Ps. Widze Falahti aktywny w temacie: Co z naprawa kosztow naprawy T50-2?

Subject: Aktualizacja Wargaming Game Center
Link on message: #16600010

Nullmaruzero, on 28 January 2019 - 03:21 PM, said: Czekamy dalej na możliwość ogarniania Common Testu z poziomu WGC. Na sandboxy były kody APP ID, na testowe nie ma

Subject: Oto nowy Wierzchołek drzewa
Link on message: #16599950

stud3nt, on 29 January 2019 - 04:38 PM, said:   A ja bym chciał, aby każdy gracz dostawał to, co sobie wybierze. Jeden chce robić linię BC, drugi WZ, inny jakiegoś ciężkiego... Teraz decyduje demokracja - a "wola ludu" rzadko trafia w moje osobiste preferencje w danej chwili.

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599948

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599864

Ladtus, on 29 January 2019 - 03:42 PM, said: Rewards  x5 XP for the battle Objective Win a battle Restrictions Only available for the vehicles in the special Place in the top 10 of your team by base XP earned Once per day for each vehicle of the branch Only available after your "First Victory of the day" bonus has been used up If you get 700 base X5 you get 3,5k XP for every victory once a day That's way worse then the 2X XP every battle This is only good for players who play 5 battles a day, This grind doesn't seem good at all  

Subject: Sytuacja z wczorajszej Kampani i pytanie do Falathiego
Link on message: #16599833

Subject: Poznejte nový speciál „Na vrcholku stromu“
Link on message: #16599794

SWAT0013, on 29 January 2019 - 04:24 PM, said: Nebyl by problém, že se (logicky) vybírají vozidla, která již hráči vlastní, kdybyste skutečně jeli od začátku do konce. Ale NIKDY se neprojely všechny linie - protože vždy došlo k nějakým změnám v systému, po kterých jste okamžitě hodili hlasování od znovu...   Stejně tak by problém nebyl, kdyby si všechny desítky byly rovny... Jenže kdo by toužil třeba po E5, když je ve hře SC apod., že?   Nic z toho ale nenastalo - takže došlo k logickým a očekávaným problémům.   Jinak ta změna vypadá zajímavě - ale podle mě zase naopak došlo ke změně, kdy zatímco předtím byl speciál zajímavý hlavně na to, aby se odjelo těch 50 výher na T10 (nebo tak nějak), nyní je ten speciál spíše zajímavější pro ty, kteří se budou expit na desítku, zatímco akce pro desítku mi přijde docela chabá...   No až praxe ukáže, zda to byla užitečná změna...


Ugzuk, on 29 January 2019 - 04:01 PM, said: Protože velká část komunity hlasovala pro oblíbená vozidla, která již byla v jejich vlastnictví, byla většina výhod speciálu „Na vrcholku stromu“ promarněna. V důsledku toho budeme vozidlo pro speciál „Na vrcholku stromu“ od nynějška každý měsíc vybírat my.   Jasně, co si dovolujete hlasovat jinak než chceme my !

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599769

Geno1isme, on 29 January 2019 - 03:11 PM, said: Nice change on the missions. But way too much XP bonuses overall, esp. with that extra x5 package. Replace some of the XP stuff with bonus credits so people can actually buy the stuff they unlock and also fully equip it.   Unfortunately it doesn't address the main issue of the EU TotT design: At one branch/month it takes over 5 years to cover the current techtrees ...


Ladtus, on 29 January 2019 - 03:18 PM, said: I kinda don't get it, can someone please help me with this Do they mean whatever tank?

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599767

badabum, on 29 January 2019 - 03:10 PM, said:   Since you are going to use unpopular tech trees for the upcoming months, may i suggest to add a couple of trees in parallel per month? Because those trees are unpopular for a reason - let's say you decide on Chinese TDs, there's no amount of TotT remake that will convince me to play the line. So at least there's a second chance for everyone to find something worth playing (in the past we used to have 2 TotT lines per month but not in parallel).

Subject: Oto nowy Wierzchołek drzewa
Link on message: #16599754

Vroobelek, on 29 January 2019 - 04:08 PM, said: No to naprawdę na bogato i wierzchołek drzewa zacznie mieć wreszcie sens, bo będzie ułatwiał grindowanie.   "Ponieważ duża część społeczności głosowała na popularne pojazdy, które już posiadała, większość korzyści wynikających z promocji Wierzchołek drzewa była zaprzepaszczana." - nic dziwnego, skoro bonusy były tylko do załogi, a jedyne dodatkowe nagrody były na X poziomie. To faktycznie było lepiej zagłosować na to, gdzie miało się już X.


Block Quote A ten pakiet "Dodatkowa premia" to rozumiem będzie w sklepie? Czyli po raz pierwszy będzie można kupić po prostu do 25k expa?

Subject: Oto nowy Wierzchołek drzewa
Link on message: #16599729

maremel, on 29 January 2019 - 03:56 PM, said: No bogato, spora marchewa dla społeczności. Tylko skąd wziąć na to wszystko czas...

Subject: Updates to the Wargaming Game Center
Link on message: #16599727

Makojin, on 29 January 2019 - 01:41 PM, said:   If you are forcing it on us, which it looks like it is already being forced to fresh installs and probably sooner or later to everyone, then yes that's exactly how I'm going to read it. I might even try it if I wasn't stuck with it forever after...     Add into that Steam, Blizzard, Epic Games, EA, Ubisoft, Bethesda etc. launchers and suddenly it's not that insignificant anymore and since the resource hogging options are turned on by default, at some point an update to one of these (even WGC) is going to screw you over while you are one-on-one fighting a JPE100 in your light tank and that small (or even more likely a big) moment of lag will get you killed.   Edit: Derp Bioware of course being part of EA.

Subject: lets help wg staff with the new PM campaign
Link on message: #16599709

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599694

Lorensoth, on 29 January 2019 - 02:55 PM, said: Too much math on thoose paid 5x stuff. On the other side, duno why WG insist game need more TX warrios that have no idea how to play with thoose tanks, but yea, w/e.

Subject: Rozpoczynamy 2019 rok od Podbijania Drzewa
Link on message: #16599690

RenamedUser_5523212089, on 29 January 2019 - 01:13 AM, said: Patrzę i oczom nie wierzę, nie ma wymogu "WYGRAJ"?! 

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599680

deorum, on 29 January 2019 - 02:53 PM, said: woooooowwww, seeems ultra nice.   Now lets hope that the next months ToT isn't something we already own. (i suppose the french new wheeled will be ToT)

Subject: Meet the New Top of the Tree
Link on message: #16599661

Subject: Retours généraux concernant la mise à jour 1.4
Link on message: #16599615

Darth_33, on 29 January 2019 - 01:35 PM, said: Bonjour à tous ,   Petite question concernant la future mise a jour , ces temps ci apparait cet avertissement au démarrage du jeu :   J'ai activer toutes les réductions , juste je n'ai pas recruté les membres dans la caserne ni acheté tous les chars pour le moment .     Pouvez vous m'en dire plus sur la "perte" potentielle des gains du jeu de cette hiver , merci .

Subject: Respect for bad players..
Link on message: #16599573

Subject: Lets try to organize forum dwellers tournament, will you support it?
Link on message: #16599547

Subject: 5 Blindshot in 3 Positionen?
Link on message: #16599546

ME_Nerd, on 29 January 2019 - 01:49 PM, said: auch ein klares danke von mir. interessant wäre, wenn man jetzt noch nachvollziehbare infos bekäme, welche konsequenzen den beiden daraus erwachen sind.

Subject: lets help wg staff with the new PM campaign
Link on message: #16599529

Subject: Today's Xtra-progress XP missions
Link on message: #16599522

Subject: KOLOBANOV'S, 9 kills, sneaky beast in map
Link on message: #16599514

Subject: Arty bad starting positions
Link on message: #16599504

Subject: Capture time in Daily tournaments
Link on message: #16599479

Subject: How would you make the game and the community better?
Link on message: #16599457

Jigabachi, on 28 January 2019 - 06:23 PM, said: I really like what you did so far, except for some ignorant posts about the state of things... but what you said there sounds like a broken record. That kind of stuff gets promised to us twice a year. So far, nothing happened, nothing improved, it just got worse. But hey, maybe mods will start to add a second line to their short closing comments again for two weeks, like the last time everything was supposed to get better.


cro001, on 28 January 2019 - 07:15 PM, said:   IMO EU office has terrible interaction with community, if my opinion even matters to you.


kubawt112, on 28 January 2019 - 09:41 PM, said: Setting up the forum structure properly would be a good start. WG themselves have been guilty of putting what they deem fitting into the 'Gameplay' section, even 'sticking' it. Proper moderation would ensure that everything wouldn't be put into one big pile. That extends into the userbase: It's a well-known fact that you can be a proper idiot on the forums without any real issues. Some are intentional, others seem to just be in the habit of using the same old "debate techniques" to confuse and derail threads at will. Neither are good things, and I would not be surprised if certain 'forumites' have an easier time getting away with their behaviour than others. Regardless, I've got better things to do than properly adress these people, and it's not always something you'd want - it tends to derail the thread or lead to pointless discussion about debeating in itself. I much prefer to ignore them. That's not exactly ideal for creating a good climate for debate, but the only viable solution unless you want to spend half your evening answering posts on a game forum.   As for differing opinions, experience suggests some might be reading too much into individual opinions than others, or rather feeling an express need to contest them without bringing anything else to the table, simply due to the topic/content/player itself. I'm not sure why, though those who've read their share of Internet discussions might have their suspicions. I believe that something posted from a player's viewpoint remains an opinion when someone expresses their personal experience, and that circumstantial/unofficial evidence isn't given value beyond its actual weight. There's after all a definite lack of proper evidence when discussing this game, but I hardly expect anyone to prove (beyond 'reasonable doubt why e.g. reducing damage on premium ammo is a good thing, why tanks need weakspots, presence of powercreep or why 'sniping bushes' should be a thing. There are however plenty of matches/situations/mechanics that make for good examples when discussing the above, though it's not exactly evidence of why something is bad or good. I'm hence not entirely convinced that debating a game is a place to demand evidence. It would quickly become a way to dismiss anyone's opinion. I've seen my fair share of, ahem, historical discussions, and it usually devolves into just that. It creates a terrible climate that fosters a 'status quo', wherein debate is pointless because differing viewpoints are discouraged.   It's also worth considering that English isn't everyone's first language, nor are everyone 'professional debaters' (open to interpretation). Take that into account when reading and responding to posts that are clearly not meant to cause harm or disruption. Most likely they'd be expecting others to express their differing/nuanced opinion, in particular when the recipient isn't known. I probably don't pay enough attention to know for certain, but I can't say I see a lot of players being attacked for their stats - outside of those making claims where their battle performance actually has some weight. Someone who demonstrably performs terribly won't have a good claim for complaining about teams or 'rigging', for instance. I'd expect the exact same thing if I implied advanced knowledge of stock trading, while all my recommendations were very clearly terrible. Alternatively, that I spent a significant amount of time discussion the game and arguing against points made (seemingly just for the sake of it) - despite not really playing the game anymore.
Generally, I'm not convinced the forum would be a terribly bad place if some of the more obvious stuff was sorted out, namely moderation that was based a bit more around 'common sense' in addition to the clear-cut forum rules. Not sure about how exactly you'd solve it, but you'd need the trusted ones to have the interest and ability to understand the forums - perhaps a bit beyond what some staff members are capable of now. Perhaps kind of like our dear Peekaboo - clearly going 'beyond the call of duty' compared to other staff members (which is probably down to changes in policy, management, let's be fair).       They have, though Peekaboo here evidently seems to try harder than the sum of all his predecessors. Like Jigabachi points out there's little 'hard' evidence to be seen so far, but he definitely seems brighter than just about every other staff member I've communicated with over the years. Maybe I'm easily impressed, but it's the first time I've seen a staff member manage a solid response to the more 'confrontational' posts.   Can't expect him to read all our posts and then brand the responsible WG staff like livestock, but his current behaviour makes me far more likely to believe that someone is actually wanting to hear our opinion (for God knows what reason, though).     Nohe isn't the head moderator, I believe, but might have been at the time you sent that PM. Earlier this year both Nohe and Jbnn were referenced as head of moderation - in the FAQ and forum rules respectively. I think they corrected it after someone pointed it out. Don't expect a non-mod staff member to chime in unless called upon.   Currently, the following are mentioned in both the FAQ and rules: http://forum.worldof...ser/dn-Kenibi-/ http://forum.worldof...unnyCommander-/   I do know about some who've had sanctions overturned, but I wouldn't take it for granted. It is well known that certain moderators have been known to act a bit more irrational than others, and that certain staff members (e.g. not just the mods) prefer to uphold a single warning point backed up by meager circumstantial evidence, despite being confronted by extensive, sound reasoning and proper evidence provided - in a borderline childish act of defiance.   In other words, don't spend time making sense.  


Rato_Black_Baron, on 28 January 2019 - 11:16 PM, said: Great forum and great game!   The passion for the game that I saw in this forum, was what made me install it in Feb2013.
It's a great bussiness tool.   For a better forum:
2 Ectars, 2 iScendings and 4 eekeeboos (great job Sir Boo!), and of course... a Premium VIII for the forumite/thread of the week.   For a better game:
Drop the 3-5-7 MM patern, and implement +1/-1MM with better chances for top tier, for the prefMM tanks. Or better, return to weight MM, with the tank's weight based on the vehicles recent performance (make it an ingame vehicle dynamic stat). Stop the powercreep and the carroussel of buffs. Change the whole strategy.   Kill a Dinger and post it = 100 bonds.