Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject: WG really need to stop adding too OP tanks
Link on message: #12291875
Link on message: #12291875
Ectar: Any tank to a certain extent can be considered OP in the hands of a
good player. Whilst you have listed certain vehicles as being
powerful, they were also released at the same time as other
vehicles that are not viewed as being powerful. Adding new content
is never an easy balance, especially when everyone categorizes
vehicles in lists of good to bad. Make a vehicle too good,
people complain that XYZ is no longer the best tank Make a vehicle
middle group, people just say to get ABC as it's better Make a
vehicle a low performer, everyone wants it to be buffed. The
sweet spot could be arguable somewhere between the middle and top,
but then do you really want each new vehicle to never shift a
certain other vehicle off the top spot? The E5 has been
around for a fairly long while now, at tier 10 the IS-7 is very
strong as is the Fv215b, T57-Heavy, IS-4, E-100, AMX-50b Any
tier 10 heavy is strong and they each have their strengths and
weaknesses. FV215b (183) is only good if you can get
that shot off and you prey to RNG for the pen. It's a tank
most people shoot gold in and you don't play for profit. You play
to wreck people. You either have to play good to support the cost
of running the tank or you buy gold to keep the premium rounds (and
likely repair costs) running. JagdPanzer E100 is strong frontally
but the minute that thing is tracked or flanked it's toast. The
obvious way to tackle it is not to go at it head on where it's
strongest..... E3 is the same as above. Track it, get round
it, job done. Ofc both tanks will shoot you from range.
That's their job. It's your job to not roll up to them that
way. You can't really be mad at a TD doing what a TD's
supposed to do. SU-122-44 I've only ever seen played good by a good
player. As a non turreted TD it suffers the same trouble as
the 2 above and can be tackled the same way. SU-100Y usually
is focused as soon as it's spotted. Box tank is a box and makes a
great target. It's also not very agile or fast. Czech tanks are
good with skilled players. Mediocre with average players. They are
not good at long range as the accuracy isn't really there, nor is
the penetration. They're good for finishing off tanks or being able
to unload on a distracted enemy but at longer ranges will lose out
to mediums like the Action X, E50M or STB-1. Also anything
that hits them pens unless it's a badly aimed turret shot.
The are strong tanks at all tiers in all classes. If every
tank had a fair chance and had similar characteristics it would
make for a boring game. Complaining that 1 tank is strong when hull
down is a bit redundant as almost every other tank in that class
will also be strong hull down because it's a common tactic to
protect a tank! That's not a bad thing, that's someone
playing smart and it's someone you don't try to trade shots with.
You need to also be smart and pull back or move round (or ask
for arty support). It makes no sense to try and face off in a
situation where you know the other player is clearly in the
advantage. TL: DR - Any tank that kills you is OP
and unfair. Whilst there may be new strong tanks introduced, there
are just as many older tanks that are still out there wrecking and
taking names. The high alpha tanks hurt, but they are very
unforgiving if you play them badly.
Subject: Premium-Laden: Der Sentinel
Link on message: #12291839
wolfkaffee, on 24 March 2016 - 11:03 AM, said: jetzt werden schon die posts gelöscht jaja die warheit tut weh gell
Link on message: #12291839
wolfkaffee, on 24 March 2016 - 11:03 AM, said: jetzt werden schon die posts gelöscht jaja die warheit tut weh gellSehales: Kritik ist absolut erlaubt, Beleidigungen gegenüber den
Spielern und WG Mitarbeitern jedoch nicht. Ich habe die
entsprechenden Beiträge lediglich unsichtbar geschaltet und ein
Moderator wird dir später eine entsprechende Sanktion dafür geben.
Bei dem Thema Moderation möchte ich außerdem auf die Forenregeln
hinweisen: Falls du eine Beschwerde diesbezüglich hast, so kannst
du dies gerne per PN schreiben, allerdings nicht direkt im Forum.
Subject: ¿para cuando un MM que tenga en cuenta la habilidad de los jugadores?
Link on message: #12291769
Link on message: #12291769
Delhroh: Ya existe un modo de juego llamado batallas en equipo donde se
tiene en cuenta la puntuación media de los jugadores. Hilo
cerrado.
Subject: 7/68 Feedback topic
Link on message: #12291670
Link on message: #12291670
Berbo: Hello, Please share your thoughts on 7/68 series in this
thread
Subject: Второй сезон ГК: обзор действий русскоязычных кланов
Link on message: #12291609
Link on message: #12291609
OldFox: Прошу прекратить оффтоп. Действительно, создайте тему в Спам-уголке
и упражняйтесь там. Последнее китайское предупреждение.
Subject: Premium-Laden: Der Sentinel
Link on message: #12291453
Link on message: #12291453
Sehales: Falls der Kauf im Premiumladen aus "Technischen Gründen nicht
möglich ist", versucht es einfach ein paar mal erneut. Es scheint
da leider ein Problem bei manchen Spielern zu geben. Falls es
weiterhin nicht geht, kontaktiert bitte den Kundendienst: http://eu.wargaming.net/support/
Subject: The Grand Finals 2016 contests - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #12291365
Frankie_1, on 23 March 2016 - 09:05 PM, said: Hi
I just submitted my competition entry to make a video relating to a team in the grand finals of the Wargaming League 2016. I submitted it via this page: http://forum.worldof...-video-contest/
Because only Wargaming staff can see replies, I got no visual confirmation as to whether my post went through ok. It makes me very nervous after putting so much work into it, that it may not have been received successfully. Maybe I hit 'go back' instead of 'Enter'?
Can you tell me did you receive the entry from myself - Frankie_1, ok?
pysio97, on 23 March 2016 - 09:46 PM, said: "Your entry needs to be submitted in the following format: - Link
to YouTube video: - Author:"
What does "Author" mean? Name in game, e-mail address, name on YouTube or real name?
Link on message: #12291365
Frankie_1, on 23 March 2016 - 09:05 PM, said: HiI just submitted my competition entry to make a video relating to a team in the grand finals of the Wargaming League 2016. I submitted it via this page: http://forum.worldof...-video-contest/
Because only Wargaming staff can see replies, I got no visual confirmation as to whether my post went through ok. It makes me very nervous after putting so much work into it, that it may not have been received successfully. Maybe I hit 'go back' instead of 'Enter'?
Can you tell me did you receive the entry from myself - Frankie_1, ok?
Soov: Yes the video is there
pysio97, on 23 March 2016 - 09:46 PM, said: "Your entry needs to be submitted in the following format: - Link
to YouTube video: - Author:"What does "Author" mean? Name in game, e-mail address, name on YouTube or real name?
Soov: Author: nickname 
Subject: 1V1 NEW MULTI CUP
Link on message: #12291177
Link on message: #12291177
Berbo: Well we used the encounter mode, most of players said it was crap
so they suggested standard mode and then we used the standard mode,
most of players said it was crap so they suggested attack
defense mode and then we used the attack defense mode, most of
players said it was crap so they suggested to use something
else.... This may seem funny but it's actually true. This
game wasn't meant to be played 1v1, what we're trying is to invent
a mode which is not supported in any way by the main game. It has
tons of flaws, that's a known fact. I knew that before I even
started thinking about it, but nothing is perfect in any tournament
and I'll rather have a tournament with many flaws than no
tournament at all. Some modes suck, some maps suck, some tanks are
better some are worse... it's up to you to find the best way to win
while it's up to us to make that journey an enjoyable one.
Keep throwing feedback with suggestions on how to improve things
and we'll make sure to look at each and every one of your posts.
Thanks!
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12291144
kawataxi, on 24 March 2016 - 12:20 AM, said: agree, would be better predominance. but, what about
cap-time? 3 min is enough for 1 tank? edit: nice tournament, keep
going. i'm in 2nd place with other 3 players at the same
point. we take the 2nd price or we must play to decide who is the
2nd??
Link on message: #12291144
kawataxi, on 24 March 2016 - 12:20 AM, said: agree, would be better predominance. but, what about
cap-time? 3 min is enough for 1 tank? edit: nice tournament, keep
going. i'm in 2nd place with other 3 players at the same
point. we take the 2nd price or we must play to decide who is the
2nd??Berbo: Always check for the left column, even if you have same
points the ranking will be different. We will give out gold
according to the ranking, and if 2 or more have the same ranking
and points then they'll get the same gold. Feel free to message me
with the group name and team name and I'll double check for you if
needed. Cheers
Subject: Kdybych mohl/a ve World of Tanks změnit 3 věci ...
Link on message: #12289343
Link on message: #12289343
Ivana_Drago: Tankisté, někteří z vás si možná všimli, že se na
anglickém fóru před nedávnem objevilo jedno zajímavé vlákno nazvané
„If you could change 3 things in World of Tanks … V tomto
vlákně měli hráči příležitost napsat 3 věci, které by ve WoT chtěli
změnit. My bychom nyní chtěli dát naší komunitě stejnou
příležitost vyjádřit se, a proto se teď ptáme také vás: Které 3
věci byste ve hře změnili, pokud byste měli tu možnost? Než
začnete psát svou odpověď, chtěla bych vás požádat, abyste se
pokusili svou odpověď zformulovat tak, aby z ní bylo možné
vyvodit reálně použitelnou zpětnou vazbu. Odpověď by tedy měla
pokrýt otázky Co? / Proč? / Jak? Poprosila bych vás
také o to, abyste se snažili vyhnout jednoslovným odpovědím a
vysvětlením typu „… protože je to na h…“ / „… protože se mi to
nelíbí“ atp. Snažte se také prosím respektovat fakt, že by to měly
být realistické změny (např. bavit se o změně v podobě
odstranění celé třídy vozidel není realistické
. Vaše odpovědi se mohou týkat jakéhokoli aspektu
hry – klanové války, eSports, Matchmaking, design map, uživatelské
rozhraní, chat, mechanika bitev atp. Snažte se prosím myslet na to,
jak by vámi navrhovaná změna ovlivnila celkový charakter hry.
Odpovědi typu „Zlevněte tanky na tieru IX.“, která vychází
z toho, že jste momentálně na tieru VIII. a hodilo by se vám
to, není úplně ten typ zpětné vazby, který bychom od vás chtěli
získat. Dobrým příkladem je naopak tento typ odpovědi:Změna:
znemožnění vytváření troll-četDůvod: troll-čety kazí zážitek ze
hry, nic dobrého nepřinášejí a za všech okolností dostávají
spojenecký tým do nevýhodné pozice; fakt, že se systém snaží
troll-četu v týmu vybalancovat přidáním tieru navíc nic nemění
na tom, že spojenecký tým má kvůli troll-četě od začátku prakticky
o tank méně - nikdy jsem neviděl nic dobrého na tom, že si člen
mého týmu s tierem X vzal do čety tier III Toto
vlákno zůstane otevřené zhruba 3 týdny, během kterých sem může
každý z vás napsat své „3 změny“. Po uplynutí této doby se
k vláknu vrátím a z vašich příspěvků sestavím report,
který bude předán našemu specialistovi a producentovi
WoT. Neberte prosím toto vlákno jako příslib toho, že cokoli
co se zde objeví, bude okamžitě změněno. Jde v první řadě o
to, abychom si udělali co nejširší obrázek o tom, jak naše
jednotlivé komunity hru vnímají. Vaše zpětná vazba z tohoto
vlákna se ale dostane tam, kam patří, a doufám, že do budoucna
poslouží jako vodítko pro vylepšení herních zážitků našich
hráčů!Chtěla bych touto cestou také poděkovat těm z vás, kteří
s námi své postřehy ohledně hry pravidelně sdílíte na fóru
formou, která je konstruktivní a přínosná. 
Subject: 1V1 NEW MULTI CUP
Link on message: #12288962
Link on message: #12288962
Berbo: Please use this thread to share your feedback about the
tournament. Focus of feedback:- Format- Tiers- Maps- Any other
rule Please do not address gold rewards, time or some
organizational matter as this is a test tournament and some things
are intentionally changed not to be like in normal cups.In case you
face any technical difficulty, please write down your team name,
link and round in which this issue happened. Thanks in
advance!
Subject: 486 Series - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #12288923
Dak28, on 23 March 2016 - 06:25 PM, said: Is possible add one player yet?
Link on message: #12288923
Dak28, on 23 March 2016 - 06:25 PM, said: Is possible add one player yet?Berbo: I'm sorry but it's not possible now, I mean we can add him
to show up on the page but he wouldn't get an invite..
Cheers!
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12288896
_Busta_, on 23 March 2016 - 05:34 PM, said: Why the tournament doesn't start earlier, like 20:00 or 21:00 or
something?
_Busta_, on 23 March 2016 - 05:40 PM, said: Such an informative answer. PS Ok I figure it out, there is a
tournament for 20:00 for 486 cup.
gskgrek, on 23 March 2016 - 05:48 PM, said: Isin't it
Read between lines. There are plenty of players who
have jobs, kids, things to do afternoon and evening. For me it's
ideal time. For other people it could be to early... you can't make
it good for everyone.
Polski11, on 23 March 2016 - 05:58 PM, said: so tier 2 will start at midnight? 
gskgrek, on 23 March 2016 - 06:18 PM, said: I think that groups should be more balanced. I see that there are
groups where players with rank around 2700 have to fight against
players with rank over 6000. In my gorup only I and one more player
have rank under 4000 and we will met players with rank over 6000
and one over 7000...
Dak28, on 23 March 2016 - 06:23 PM, said: Tier 2??? i registered on that
Link on message: #12288896
_Busta_, on 23 March 2016 - 05:34 PM, said: Why the tournament doesn't start earlier, like 20:00 or 21:00 or
something?Berbo: This one is for testing and we wanted to allow players to
play in 486s too. Future editions will be earlier.
_Busta_, on 23 March 2016 - 05:40 PM, said: Such an informative answer. PS Ok I figure it out, there is a
tournament for 20:00 for 486 cup.Berbo:
gskgrek, on 23 March 2016 - 05:48 PM, said: Isin't it Berbo: Ideally we need to make a few cups and one would start at
19:00, next one 21 next one 23... even maybe midnight cup :p So
everyone can play at any time they feel like. Don't forget this is
a test tournament.
Polski11, on 23 March 2016 - 05:58 PM, said: so tier 2 will start at midnight? Berbo: People who signed up knew they would play around 10-11,
sorry about that but it was known in advance
gskgrek, on 23 March 2016 - 06:18 PM, said: I think that groups should be more balanced. I see that there are
groups where players with rank around 2700 have to fight against
players with rank over 6000. In my gorup only I and one more player
have rank under 4000 and we will met players with rank over 6000
and one over 7000...Berbo: There is no balancing in groups, there's no system to
enforce it and even if we would add it then there would be a
million of complaints how it didnt calculate values. Some player
should have met only players of rank 3000 not 3010. It's random,
sometimes you get stronger opponents, sometimes weaker. This is
something to cope with
Also if we would
balance skill then we would have to balance gold as well. Dont you
think?
Dak28, on 23 March 2016 - 06:23 PM, said: Tier 2??? i registered on thatBerbo: I don't understand, is this a question or an answer?
Subject: Concurso de Facebook - Consigue el Manual del Comandante
Link on message: #12288836
Link on message: #12288836
CurlyJohnny: Hola a todos, Creo este hilo para informaros de que
hemos iniciado hoy un concurso en nuestra página de Facebook para
ofreceros la posibilidad de conseguir un ejemplar del Manual del
Comandante. Está firmado por Artiom Muraska (World of
Tanks Publishing Producer, Europe). Lo único que tenéis que
hacer para participar es pasaros por esta publicación de Facebook y dejar ahí un
comentario en el que nos contéis por qué deberíais ser los
merecedores de este gran regalo. No hay límites: podéis intentar
convencernos creando un gif, un meme, un vídeo, o sencillamente un
par de frases de texto.
La participación está abierta desde hoy día 22
de marzo hasta el 11 de abril a las 23:59 (CET). ¡Os animo a
participar! ¡Saludos!
Subject: Premium-Laden: Der Sentinel
Link on message: #12288675
Ghetto_Kid, on 23 March 2016 - 05:41 PM, said: Hallo Moin kann man premium Panzer wieder für echt Geld
verkaufen ?
Link on message: #12288675
Ghetto_Kid, on 23 March 2016 - 05:41 PM, said: Hallo Moin kann man premium Panzer wieder für echt Geld
verkaufen ?Sehales: Nein, du kannst allerdings den Support anschreiben um den
Kauf rpckgängig zu machen, sofern du mit dem Panzer noch nicht
gespielt hast.
Subject: Liste von unerlaubten cheats (Mods) | List of illegal cheats [PROJECT]
Link on message: #12288628
Link on message: #12288628
Sehales: Da dies die deutschsprachige Forensektion ist, habe ich den Beitrag
mal übersetzt. Bitte versucht das Thema trotzdem auf deutsch zu
führen, ansonsten könnt ihr auch gleich in der englischen Sektion
mitschreiben, da sonst der Sinn etwas verfehlt wurde, wenn in der
DE Forensektion englisch geschrieben wird. I translated the post to
German, as we are in the German forum section. Please try to stick
to German when posting here, otherwise you may just post directly
in the English forum section, as it makes no sense to have an
English discussion in the German forum section.
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12288446
______SNOOPY______, on 23 March 2016 - 05:19 PM, said: Its really funny cup. I like it.
Its great to achieve good
communication and understanding between 2 players. p.s. We won
1st place with all wins 
Link on message: #12288446
______SNOOPY______, on 23 March 2016 - 05:19 PM, said: Its really funny cup. I like it. Berbo: Congrats guys! I hope you'll win a lot more!

Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12288442
Link on message: #12288442
Berbo: Not accepting any more changes or tiers or any team/player changes.
Registration is closed, we are setting up groups and schedule
Cheers!
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12288431
MicMacV17, on 23 March 2016 - 04:01 PM, said: I'd like to register to 8 tier competition and sry for problems
Cheers
nenadsrb, on 23 March 2016 - 04:05 PM, said: Time in between battles generates boredom and kills all the thrill
generated on previous battle. Absolutely no need to be that long.
Or at least put an option if both teams are ready it can go sooner.
Polski11, on 23 March 2016 - 04:21 PM, said: http://worldoftanks.eu/en/tournaments/931/ So when
will other tiers start?
If GROUP STAGE - TIER 10 DAY
1: MAXIMUM 9 BATTLES EU 1 ‐ 21:30, 23 MAR, WE
GROUP STAGE - TIER 9 DAY 1: MAXIMUM 9 BATTLES EU
1 ‐ 21:35, 23 MAR, WE GROUP STAGE - TIER 8 DAY
1: MAXIMUM 9 BATTLES EU 1 ‐ 22:40, 23 MAR, WE
Link on message: #12288431
MicMacV17, on 23 March 2016 - 04:01 PM, said: I'd like to register to 8 tier competition and sry for problems
CheersBerbo: Changed, Not a problem at all!
nenadsrb, on 23 March 2016 - 04:05 PM, said: Time in between battles generates boredom and kills all the thrill
generated on previous battle. Absolutely no need to be that long.
Or at least put an option if both teams are ready it can go sooner.Berbo: It's not that simple, time between battles is 5 min. If you
finish battle in 1 minute we can't move the whole schedule to fit
one team. Even though we would like to speed it up, it's not
technically doable at this time. Once it becomes, we'll
definitely work on reduction of the breaks.
Polski11, on 23 March 2016 - 04:21 PM, said: http://worldoftanks.eu/en/tournaments/931/ So when
will other tiers start? Berbo: DAY 1: MAXIMUM 9 BATTLES
Subject: The Battle for Himmelsdorf - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #12288367
Tankje007, on 23 March 2016 - 03:45 PM, said: So the Tournament will start at 19:00 CET, but you don't have
to immediately play battles, but can wait till like 20:00 CET
and then begin? or 21:00 ???
Link on message: #12288367
Tankje007, on 23 March 2016 - 03:45 PM, said: So the Tournament will start at 19:00 CET, but you don't have
to immediately play battles, but can wait till like 20:00 CET
and then begin? or 21:00 ???Calogridis: I don't understand. When I say that the Tournament will
start at 19:00 CET (third time btw), it means that you will play
battles at 19:00 CET. If you are too late, the system will
automatically forfeit you.
Subject: le 2ème problème
Link on message: #12288240
Link on message: #12288240
Tanatoy: M'sieur Jolivingston, merci d'avance d'utiliser le bouton
multiquote
Subject: İvan Bebek yüzünden 3 gün ban.Lantirn, hayrola?
Link on message: #12288222
rahmib, on 23 March 2016 - 04:23 PM, said: Peki Vuque, o kısaltmaya ceza veriyoruz diyorsun, ama senin
modların yukarıda alıntıladığım mesajdaki aynı
kısaltmaya hiçbir ceza ve hatta editleme bile yapmadılar.ben
konuyu açınca sen görmeden, yeni editlediler.Hukukda emsal diye bir
durum vardır.Ben suçu işlediğim zamanda ceza vermiyordunuz, hukuken
şimdi ceza verdiklerine göre, cezanın iptali gerekir
Link on message: #12288222
rahmib, on 23 March 2016 - 04:23 PM, said: Peki Vuque, o kısaltmaya ceza veriyoruz diyorsun, ama senin
modların yukarıda alıntıladığım mesajdaki aynı
kısaltmaya hiçbir ceza ve hatta editleme bile yapmadılar.ben
konuyu açınca sen görmeden, yeni editlediler.Hukukda emsal diye bir
durum vardır.Ben suçu işlediğim zamanda ceza vermiyordunuz, hukuken
şimdi ceza verdiklerine göre, cezanın iptali gerekir vuque: Öncelikle pek fazla kimsenin bilmediği bir şeyden
bahsedeyim, Wargaming'de çalışmaya başlamadan önce Hukuk
fakültesinde okuyordum ve bize öğretilen şeylerden bir tanesi "sui
misal emsal teşkil etmez" idi. Bugünkü halk diline bunu 'Kötü
örnek, örnek oluşturmaz' diye çevirebiliriz. Bahsettiğiniz
durumu açıklayayım, her ne kadar durumu sizin de çok iyi
bildiğinizi düşünsem bile açıklamak istiyorum; Bahsi geçen olayın
10 Ocak 2015 tarihinde WoT Blitz forumlarında olduğunu
biliyorsunuzdur, araştırmanızı yaparken muhakkak gözünüze
çarpmıştır o mesajın hangi tarihte atıldığı. O zamanlarda şu anda
moderatörlerimiz olan lantirn161 ve semm moderatör değillerdi, bu
sebeple onları suçlamak doğru olmaz. Daha doğrusu herhangi bir
moderatörü suçlamak doğru olmaz çünkü moderatörler foruma yazılan
her şeyi okumak zorunda değil. Forum'da kural ihlali olan bir mesaj
varsa bunu rapor etmek oyuncuların üzerine düşen bir şey ve ondan
sonra bu raporları kontrol etmek ve gerekeni yapmak moderatörlerin
görevi. Bahsettiğiniz mesaj ise hiç bir şekilde son zamanlara kadar
rapor edilmemiş, bu sebeple forumlarda kalmış. Sizin forumda link
koyduğunuzu görünce bizzat ben gittim WoT Blitz forumunda o mesajı
raporladım (bu arada "hassas" bir forum kullanıcısı olarak bu
mesajı tespit ettiğinizde sizin raporlamanızı beklerdim ancak
raporlamamışsınız ne yazık ki!) yani mesajı görmemem ve
moderatörlerin ben görmeden bir şey yapması gibi bir durum söz
konusu değil. Ayrıca şunu belirtmek isterim ki raporumda
mesaj eski olduğu için kullanıcıya ceza verilmeden mesajın
editlenmesi gerektiğini bildirdim ve sonrasında görüldüğü üzere
moderatörler gerekli işlemleri yapmışlar. Gelelim mesajın
başında dediğimiz konuya, "sui misal emsal teşkil etmez"
ilkesinden yola çıkarak cezanın iptalinin gerekmediğini rahatlıkla
söyleyebilirim. Saygılar,
Subject: Nivel VIII de la semana: T-34-3
Link on message: #12288174
rocannrol, on 23 March 2016 - 04:14 PM, said: Gracias Curly¡¡ Te agradezco mucho que contestes
nuestras opiniones, es una buena política trasladarlas a la
empresa, ahora falta que alguien dentro de la compañía te escuche.
En concreto me refiero a que en las ofertas del tier VIII se
incorporaran tanques que NO están habitualmente en la tienda, de
esta forma despierta más interés al tratarse de una novedad, es una
opinión personal.
Link on message: #12288174
rocannrol, on 23 March 2016 - 04:14 PM, said: Gracias Curly¡¡ Te agradezco mucho que contestes
nuestras opiniones, es una buena política trasladarlas a la
empresa, ahora falta que alguien dentro de la compañía te escuche.
En concreto me refiero a que en las ofertas del tier VIII se
incorporaran tanques que NO están habitualmente en la tienda, de
esta forma despierta más interés al tratarse de una novedad, es una
opinión personal.CurlyJohnny: Entiendo a que te refieres. Gracias por compartir tu
opinión, rocannrol.
¡Saludos!
Subject: İvan Bebek yüzünden 3 gün ban.Lantirn, hayrola?
Link on message: #12288070
tarikataka, on 23 March 2016 - 03:59 PM, said:
Link on message: #12288070
tarikataka, on 23 March 2016 - 03:59 PM, said: vuque:
Son yaptığım edit ve açıklamadan sonra
sanırım bu daha doğru olacak. Kusura bakmayın, benim
hatam. 
Son yaptığım edit ve açıklamadan sonra
sanırım bu daha doğru olacak. Kusura bakmayın, benim
hatam.
Subject: The Battle for Himmelsdorf - Questions & Answers
Link on message: #12287995
pancerfaust5, on 23 March 2016 - 11:12 AM, said: You said there was no problem to move turnament to 19:00. So when
it Will finally start???
Link on message: #12287995
pancerfaust5, on 23 March 2016 - 11:12 AM, said: You said there was no problem to move turnament to 19:00. So when
it Will finally start???Calogridis: As I said previously, the Tournament will start at 19:00
CET.
Subject: İvan Bebek yüzünden 3 gün ban.Lantirn, hayrola?
Link on message: #12287989
rahmib, on 23 March 2016 - 03:39 PM, said: Konuyu dağıtmayın.Güzel forumumuzun yöneticilerinin adaleti
konumuz.Bakın bu konuda bile forumdaki kullanıcılara hakaret
edenlere ban cezası vermiyorlar(uyarı cezası bile verdiklerini
sanmıyorum, çünkü hakaret edilen benim) , ama Tüm Türkiyeyi kanser
eden Türk düşmanı Hırvat hakeme küfür kısaltması yazdık diye bize
gözlerini kırpmadan ban verirler. Vuque' ye itiraz mesajı attık,
cevap verme tenezülünde bile bulunmadı. Yerigelince "modlardan
şikayetiniz varsa bana mesaj atın" diyo ama... Sonra geceleri rahat
rahat uyurlar. iyi uykular (uykunuz kaçarsa rezene çayı iyi geliyor
diyorlar)
Link on message: #12287989
rahmib, on 23 March 2016 - 03:39 PM, said: Konuyu dağıtmayın.Güzel forumumuzun yöneticilerinin adaleti
konumuz.Bakın bu konuda bile forumdaki kullanıcılara hakaret
edenlere ban cezası vermiyorlar(uyarı cezası bile verdiklerini
sanmıyorum, çünkü hakaret edilen benim) , ama Tüm Türkiyeyi kanser
eden Türk düşmanı Hırvat hakeme küfür kısaltması yazdık diye bize
gözlerini kırpmadan ban verirler. Vuque' ye itiraz mesajı attık,
cevap verme tenezülünde bile bulunmadı. Yerigelince "modlardan
şikayetiniz varsa bana mesaj atın" diyo ama... Sonra geceleri rahat
rahat uyurlar. iyi uykular (uykunuz kaçarsa rezene çayı iyi geliyor
diyorlar)vuque: Sizden bana son zamanlarda herhangi bir özel mesaj gelmedi.
Özür diliyorum gelmiş, ben görmemişim. Özel mesajdan cevap
veriyorum.
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12287962
MicMacV17, on 23 March 2016 - 03:15 PM, said: Hey Cheers admins I have a question, is it possible to
register out from 3 to the other tier competition today? My team
names #MicMac I would like to hear the responde.
Cheers
Link on message: #12287962
MicMacV17, on 23 March 2016 - 03:15 PM, said: Hey Cheers admins I have a question, is it possible to
register out from 3 to the other tier competition today? My team
names #MicMac I would like to hear the responde.
CheersBerbo: Yes but you need to say which one and do it before end of
registration 
Subject: Premium-Laden: Der Sentinel
Link on message: #12287956
h4nfling, on 23 March 2016 - 03:26 PM, said: b wenns ums Geld geht antwortet innerhalb von 12
Minuten ein WG Mitarbeiter im Forum...

Link on message: #12287956
h4nfling, on 23 March 2016 - 03:26 PM, said: b wenns ums Geld geht antwortet innerhalb von 12
Minuten ein WG Mitarbeiter im Forum... Sehales: Ich verfolge anfangs immer die Diskussionen zu neuen
Artikeln, sofern nicht im Sekundentakt Beiträge erscheinen und auf
was anderes gab es hier nichts für mich zu antworten in diesem
Thread 
Subject: Nivel VIII de la semana: T-34-3
Link on message: #12287937
rocannrol, on 23 March 2016 - 11:29 AM, said: Gracias por vuestras opiniones. Ante todo concretar que
hablo solo de las ofertas del Tier VIII no del Sentiel ni de otras
ofertas para eso cada una tiene su post. Bien como tu dices; tu lo
tienes, no se desde cuando pero no has esperado a la
oferta, y seguro que la mayoría de los que opinen por aquí,
ya lo tienen, y eso es lo que me refiero, lo que explico en mi
comentario, las ofertas en general (excepto contadas
ocasiones) son muy repetitivas y eso no despierta interés. Es bueno
que opinemos todos, solo hay que esperar que WG recoja nuestros
comentarios.
Link on message: #12287937
rocannrol, on 23 March 2016 - 11:29 AM, said: Gracias por vuestras opiniones. Ante todo concretar que
hablo solo de las ofertas del Tier VIII no del Sentiel ni de otras
ofertas para eso cada una tiene su post. Bien como tu dices; tu lo
tienes, no se desde cuando pero no has esperado a la
oferta, y seguro que la mayoría de los que opinen por aquí,
ya lo tienen, y eso es lo que me refiero, lo que explico en mi
comentario, las ofertas en general (excepto contadas
ocasiones) son muy repetitivas y eso no despierta interés. Es bueno
que opinemos todos, solo hay que esperar que WG recoja nuestros
comentarios.CurlyJohnny: Supongo que te refieres sobre todo a las ofertas semanales
de la tienda premium, cuyos paquetes suelen repetirse con
frecuencia, siendo quizá menos atractivos de lo que os gustaría.
Todas las semanas escuchamos vuestros comentarios al respecto y los
compartimos con el departamento correspondiente para que sepan cuál
la opinión de la comunidad española al respecto.
¡Saludos!
Subject: Tienda premium: El Sentinel
Link on message: #12287870
birimbao_1, on 23 March 2016 - 12:18 PM, said: http://tanks.gg/wot/tank/sentinel El
peor dpm de lejos... y no te dejes impresionar por los 60 de
punta... te hará falta la.cuesta del halluf y no se ni si con
esas... la movilidad es mala... acelera fatal... y la punta real es
cortisima... no tiene nada bueno... salvo el precio y para mi
el bun trabajo de modelado y el diseño de camuflaje
rocannrol, on 23 March 2016 - 03:31 PM, said: Señores de WG necesitamos un poco más de voluntad de complacer al
cliente, por lo que leo en todos los hilos quizás están descuidando
un poco el escuchar, y más que escuchar atender las inquietudes de
los jugadores, no es un tema insustancial si quieren ganar dinero.
MrAtkins, on 23 March 2016 - 02:58 PM, said: Bueno... y la joya esta... ¿va al árbol o no va?
Link on message: #12287870
birimbao_1, on 23 March 2016 - 12:18 PM, said: http://tanks.gg/wot/tank/sentinel El
peor dpm de lejos... y no te dejes impresionar por los 60 de
punta... te hará falta la.cuesta del halluf y no se ni si con
esas... la movilidad es mala... acelera fatal... y la punta real es
cortisima... no tiene nada bueno... salvo el precio y para mi
el bun trabajo de modelado y el diseño de camuflajeCurlyJohnny: Gracias por compatir las características del tanque con el
resto de jugadores. Si queréis contrastar más datos o opiniones al
respecto del carro, os animo a que visitéis este hilo del foro, donde además del análisis
de Demonielo tenéis enlazados todos los vídeos que nuestros
colaboradores han sacado sobre este AC-1 Sentinel.
rocannrol, on 23 March 2016 - 03:31 PM, said: Señores de WG necesitamos un poco más de voluntad de complacer al
cliente, por lo que leo en todos los hilos quizás están descuidando
un poco el escuchar, y más que escuchar atender las inquietudes de
los jugadores, no es un tema insustancial si quieren ganar dinero.CurlyJohnny: Por otro lado, como ya sabéis, recientemente hemos añadido
la posibilidad de que consigáis carros premium como este sin
añadidos que aumenten el precio, una opción que llevabais mucho
tiempo pidiendo y que finalmente conseguimos que se implementase
gracias a vuestros comentarios. Esta nueva política es una
buena oportunidad, no solo para coleccionistas, sino para el resto
de jugadores, para aumentar vuestra colección de tanques sin tener
que adquirir un tanque con extras que no os interesan.
MrAtkins, on 23 March 2016 - 02:58 PM, said: Bueno... y la joya esta... ¿va al árbol o no va?CurlyJohnny: Va al árbol de desarrollo británico, si es eso a lo que te
refieres.
¡Saludos! EDITO: Como es un tanque
"especial" con camuflaje y emblema exclusivo, este vehículo no será
añadido al árbol de desarrollo para comprarlo por oro. La única
forma de obtenerlo será a través de la tienda premium.
Subject: Coraz bliżej święta
Link on message: #12287758
Link on message: #12287758
Falathi: Są miejsca w Polsce, gdzie nie daje się absolutnie żadnych
prezentów na Wielkanoc. A za kulturkę dziękujemy.
Subject: Bitwy na mapach generowanych losowo - NOWY TRYB ROZGRYWKI
Link on message: #12287658
Link on message: #12287658
Falathi: Sprawa została zgłoszona. Już jakiś czas temu.
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12287593
angelaki, on 23 March 2016 - 11:44 AM, said: Match time could be a bit longer so flanking with HTs could be a
better option. Most of the time we had to fight from the position
of the first contact since wasting time for a repositioning was too
risky. All in all it was pretty funny - game mode was good for a
two on two game but why not 1 central flag per team so both teams
could start to capture but reach the enemy still in time?
Bohy_CZ, on 23 March 2016 - 12:21 PM, said: time between battles should be shortened from 10 minutes to 7 and
1vs1 would put encounter, otherwise nice tournament
Peccatus, on 23 March 2016 - 12:22 PM, said: I agree with Siegy, time between matches should be lowered to 5
minutes from the current 10 minutes. The cup would be over quicker
and there would be less wasted time, as it stands now. 10 minutes
is not enough to neither play a random match neither do something
non world of tanks related.
Other than that, I like the 2vs2 format, it's quite fun
.
Link on message: #12287593
angelaki, on 23 March 2016 - 11:44 AM, said: Match time could be a bit longer so flanking with HTs could be a
better option. Most of the time we had to fight from the position
of the first contact since wasting time for a repositioning was too
risky. All in all it was pretty funny - game mode was good for a
two on two game but why not 1 central flag per team so both teams
could start to capture but reach the enemy still in time?Berbo:
Bohy_CZ, on 23 March 2016 - 12:21 PM, said: time between battles should be shortened from 10 minutes to 7 and
1vs1 would put encounter, otherwise nice tournamentBerbo:
Peccatus, on 23 March 2016 - 12:22 PM, said: I agree with Siegy, time between matches should be lowered to 5
minutes from the current 10 minutes. The cup would be over quicker
and there would be less wasted time, as it stands now. 10 minutes
is not enough to neither play a random match neither do something
non world of tanks related. Other than that, I like the 2vs2 format, it's quite fun
Berbo: It's not that easy from technical side. Battles start
at 19:00 and they are 7 minutes long. Next battle window shows up 5
min before. So next battle should start at 19:13, because we
add 1 min on top to make sure all goes smooth. I don't see a
way to cut 5 minutes from here unless we cut battle time
completely.
Subject: Bitwy na mapach generowanych losowo - NOWY TRYB ROZGRYWKI
Link on message: #12287571
Thorgerder, on 23 March 2016 - 02:14 PM, said: Ta gra ma niewiele wspólnego z realiami II wojny, czołgiści
nie atakowali całkowicie na ślepo, zazwyczaj dysponowali mapami,
ew. jakieś informacje z rozpoznania/wywiadu. Ofc. nie zawsze to
działało, czasami dowódca posyłał swoje czołgi do ataku przez pole
minowe, czy bagno, a i sami czołgiści nie grzeszyli inteligencją

Link on message: #12287571
Thorgerder, on 23 March 2016 - 02:14 PM, said: Ta gra ma niewiele wspólnego z realiami II wojny, czołgiści
nie atakowali całkowicie na ślepo, zazwyczaj dysponowali mapami,
ew. jakieś informacje z rozpoznania/wywiadu. Ofc. nie zawsze to
działało, czasami dowódca posyłał swoje czołgi do ataku przez pole
minowe, czy bagno, a i sami czołgiści nie grzeszyli inteligencją
Falathi: Niestety - ale wersja do bólu realistyczna byłaby zbyt
skomplikowana dla przeciętnego gracza:
1. Na ogół istniałaby dysproporcja sił, czasem większa, czasem mniejsza, czasem na korzyść, czasem na niekorzyść. 2. Prawdziwa II wojna oznacza współpracę z piechotą, oznacza działa ppanc, okazjonalne uderzenia artyleryjskie, czy wsparcie z powietrza. 3. Dalej idą problemy z łącznością i logistyką: czasem wszystko działa jak trzeba, czasem mamy totalny chaos i nic nie wiadomo.
I tak dalej, i tak dalej.
Ograniczenie gry wyłącznie do czołgów jest uproszczeniem, ale z drugiej strony oznacza skupienie się na pojedynkach pancernych, czyli tym, co najwyraźniej najbardziej interesuje graczy. @DriveBy - ten, tego... ładna mapka.
1. Na ogół istniałaby dysproporcja sił, czasem większa, czasem mniejsza, czasem na korzyść, czasem na niekorzyść. 2. Prawdziwa II wojna oznacza współpracę z piechotą, oznacza działa ppanc, okazjonalne uderzenia artyleryjskie, czy wsparcie z powietrza. 3. Dalej idą problemy z łącznością i logistyką: czasem wszystko działa jak trzeba, czasem mamy totalny chaos i nic nie wiadomo.
I tak dalej, i tak dalej.
Ograniczenie gry wyłącznie do czołgów jest uproszczeniem, ale z drugiej strony oznacza skupienie się na pojedynkach pancernych, czyli tym, co najwyraźniej najbardziej interesuje graczy. @DriveBy - ten, tego... ładna mapka.
Subject: One on One & Two on Two - Test Tournament Feedback
Link on message: #12287563
Gavro77, on 23 March 2016 - 02:04 PM, said: @Berbo Is there a way i can see here:
only teams registered for my tier?
Some filter or something?
Link on message: #12287563
Gavro77, on 23 March 2016 - 02:04 PM, said: @Berbo Is there a way i can see here:
only teams registered for my tier?
Some filter or something?Berbo: Once the registration is over I'll split all teams into
groups, then we'll create schedule and you'll be able to see all
groups for your tier. Cheers! 
Subject: Buff the Centurion I's DPM
Link on message: #12287196
LordMuffin, on 23 March 2016 - 11:37 AM, said: It is worse then a Pershing in every category except penetration.
So why would anyone use Cent instead of Persh? When Persh does
everything Cent 1 does but better.
Link on message: #12287196
LordMuffin, on 23 March 2016 - 11:37 AM, said: It is worse then a Pershing in every category except penetration.
So why would anyone use Cent instead of Persh? When Persh does
everything Cent 1 does but better.Ectar: I've got 191 matches with the Pershing (which arguably I've
not played in a long time) and 315 with the Centurion. Both stats
are roughly the same and both were played pretty much in the same
role although I'd hang back more with the Centurion. Never
really felt it was lacking in any area other than perhaps being a
little slow compared to other tier VIII meds. I could hit
heavies from range and didn't put myself on the front lines.
I guess it's down to personal preference really. I don't
expect every tank played to be capable of carrying every match,
usually when people want tanks changed they just want a certain
tank to be more like another tank (but better by carrying it's
other parameters over to the level the different tank is).
It's like the 7/1. It's not a bad tank really, it just works
differently to the fast medium play style that players pick up from
other trees. The Cent and Cent 7/1 play more like TD's
without the camo. The Panther L/100 is a tank that sorta
plays the same way. Trying to create balance and still have
different play styles/characteristics it's always easy, especially
if you want to avoid all tanks feeling like they're just the same
but with different looks on them.
Subject: Premium-Laden: Der Sentinel
Link on message: #12287172
_Tiny_Tina_, on 23 March 2016 - 01:27 PM, said: Würde ich mir gern kaufen... Wenn ich nur irgendwie Bezahlen könnte
ohne Fehlermeldungen wie " Bitte korrekte Bankdaten eingeben!" oder
"Dieser Bezahlservice ist momentan nicht verfügbar!"
Link on message: #12287172
_Tiny_Tina_, on 23 March 2016 - 01:27 PM, said: Würde ich mir gern kaufen... Wenn ich nur irgendwie Bezahlen könnte
ohne Fehlermeldungen wie " Bitte korrekte Bankdaten eingeben!" oder
"Dieser Bezahlservice ist momentan nicht verfügbar!"Sehales: Bitte wende dich an den Kundendienst: http://eu.wargaming.net/support/
Hat sonst noch jemand derartige Probleme oder ist das ein
Einzelfall?
Subject: Buff the Centurion I's DPM
Link on message: #12286659
rsanders5, on 23 March 2016 - 10:32 AM, said: It would be nice if more maps suited this form of
play, particularly as a lot of the British armour was designed with
this form of fighting in mind. You would also need to educate a lot
of the players as well, since sitting back & nibbling bits off of
the enemy is not seen as the way to play tanks.
Link on message: #12286659
rsanders5, on 23 March 2016 - 10:32 AM, said: It would be nice if more maps suited this form of
play, particularly as a lot of the British armour was designed with
this form of fighting in mind. You would also need to educate a lot
of the players as well, since sitting back & nibbling bits off of
the enemy is not seen as the way to play tanks.Ectar: There is lots of maps with hills and rises that support the
hull down style of play. Remember for every map we introduce that
would suit that sort of play specific for that tank would work
against tanks that don't have high penetration/gun depression.
Subject: Prémiový obchod: Sentinel
Link on message: #12286579
CrackonoshDesu, on 23 March 2016 - 10:10 AM, said: A tu kamufláž můžu hodit na jinej tank? To je snad jediná dobrá věc
na tý nabídce...
Link on message: #12286579
CrackonoshDesu, on 23 March 2016 - 10:10 AM, said: A tu kamufláž můžu hodit na jinej tank? To je snad jediná dobrá věc
na tý nabídce...Ketankis: Ne, kamufláž je pouze pro Sentinel, nemůžeš ji použít pro
jiný tank.
Реклама | Adv















