Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Falathi
Mińsk
11.12.2018 12:23:54
Dryndam na Cypr...
Jahpero
More missions coming?
11.12.2018 12:18:45
Subject: More missions coming?
Link on message: #16433643
Link on message: #16433643
Jahpero: Hello everyone,
I locked this thread as it has been created on 2017.
Thank you in advance for avoiding to bump old threads.
Have a good day !
Jahpero
I locked this thread as it has been created on 2017.
Thank you in advance for avoiding to bump old threads.
Have a good day !
Jahpero
thePhilX
Updated Kartenpool für Festungen
11.12.2018 12:14:51
Subject: Updated Kartenpool für Festungen
Link on message: #16433627
MAD_Fr34k, on 10 December 2018 - 08:55 AM, said: Ich begrüße, dass der Karten-Pool für Stufe-VI Scharmützel
vergrößert wurde. Ich habe seitdem er verkleinert wurde kaum
Stufe-VI Scharmützel mehr gefahren, da sie sehr eintönig geworden
waren. Es war fast immer ein stumpfes T-34-85M
Aufeinanderlosfahren. Mal sehen wie sich das jetzt durch die wieder
höhere Kartenvielfalt entwickelt.
Link on message: #16433627
MAD_Fr34k, on 10 December 2018 - 08:55 AM, said: Ich begrüße, dass der Karten-Pool für Stufe-VI Scharmützel
vergrößert wurde. Ich habe seitdem er verkleinert wurde kaum
Stufe-VI Scharmützel mehr gefahren, da sie sehr eintönig geworden
waren. Es war fast immer ein stumpfes T-34-85M
Aufeinanderlosfahren. Mal sehen wie sich das jetzt durch die wieder
höhere Kartenvielfalt entwickelt.thePhilX: Wir hoffen das neue Karten wie Redshire, Murowanka und
Westfield genug Möglichkeiten für Panzerklassen mit
unterschiedlichen Stärken und Schwächen geben. Jedoch werden wir
weiterhin begutachten müssen, ob diese Maps nicht zu groß für
Panzer der Stufe 6 mit wenig Mobilität oder Sichtweite sind.
Delhroh
Un escenario en fase de test
11.12.2018 12:08:59
Subject: Un escenario en fase de test
Link on message: #16433608
Link on message: #16433608
Delhroh: 
Hoy comenzamos a testear un prototipo de
escenario. No sabemos si se convertirá en un nuevo mapa, dado que
nuestra intención principal es asegurarnos el funcionamiento de
estos nuevos objetos en el juego y recoger datos para el desarrollo
de mapas.Esta localización contiene un montón de objetos no
habitual y opciones de asaltos tácticos. Es un prototipo que
mejoraremos en base a los resultados del test. Actualmente no tiene
un concepto histórico o geográfico concreto.El terreno es mixto,
combinando bloques de ciudad con espacios abiertos en el flanco
izquierdo donde las irregularidades del terreno se pueden usar como
cobertura.1) Las defensas aéreas del lado oeste del mapa tiene
protecciones redondeadas que protegen del fuego enemigo mientras
estos atacan a través de campo abierto. Los tanques pesados pueden
utilizar solo la carretera, y los tanques más maniobrables puede
que quieran llegara allí a través de las laderas. Hay un gran
montículo artificial en el centro de esta zona, alrededor del
búnker de comandancia. El montículo está cubierto por árboles y es
el punto clave para avanzar hacia los matorrales. Desde allí puedes
atacar a las posiciones de antitanques de la zona 2 o preparar tu
ataque, moviéndote más allá de las zonas de defensa.2) Las lomas
cerca de ambas bases son para antitanques y otros vehículos
francotiradores. Situándose allí servirá para defender tu base de
los ataques provenientes de la zona de los matorrales. Las lomas
además son la última línea de defensa contra el avance enemigo que
venga de la ciudad.3) En el centro la estación de tren y la base
militar proporcionan posiciones de cobertura, pero no protección
completa contra el fuego de artillería enemigo y fuego directo.
Desde aquí todavía puedes avanzar a través de la zona, moverte a
otro flanco o luchar contra algunos enemigos. La estación
proporciona algo de protección, pero no puedes avanzar desde
dentro. 4) Los bloques de la ciudad en la parte este del río es la
zona designada para los vehículos pesados. Los puentes están
cubiertos del fuego cruzado del centro del mapa, y avanzar
rápidamente hacia la esquina de la estación de tren podrá evitar el
recibir fuego enemigo que no podrás devolver. El terraplén es
curvo, lo que crea algo de cobertura, pero no deja de ser un lugar
peligroso. Los puntos clave para los pesados son las zonas
interiores y los caminos que llevan hasta ellos. Ha dos de estos
últimos, uno tiene dos bloques de cemento que te permitirán usar el
tipo de juego hull-down. Aún, en esta posición puedes ser atacados
por antitanques que se ocultan en los arbustos dentro de las zonas
interiores. El pasaje sin bloques de cemento servirá para los
tanques que utilicen la táctica de side-scrapping. Dependiendo de
los resultados del test, decidiremos que ocurre con este
mapa. 
¡Seguid
las noticias y mucha suerte en el campo de batalla!
Hoy comenzamos a testear un prototipo de
escenario. No sabemos si se convertirá en un nuevo mapa, dado que
nuestra intención principal es asegurarnos el funcionamiento de
estos nuevos objetos en el juego y recoger datos para el desarrollo
de mapas.Esta localización contiene un montón de objetos no
habitual y opciones de asaltos tácticos. Es un prototipo que
mejoraremos en base a los resultados del test. Actualmente no tiene
un concepto histórico o geográfico concreto.El terreno es mixto,
combinando bloques de ciudad con espacios abiertos en el flanco
izquierdo donde las irregularidades del terreno se pueden usar como
cobertura.1) Las defensas aéreas del lado oeste del mapa tiene
protecciones redondeadas que protegen del fuego enemigo mientras
estos atacan a través de campo abierto. Los tanques pesados pueden
utilizar solo la carretera, y los tanques más maniobrables puede
que quieran llegara allí a través de las laderas. Hay un gran
montículo artificial en el centro de esta zona, alrededor del
búnker de comandancia. El montículo está cubierto por árboles y es
el punto clave para avanzar hacia los matorrales. Desde allí puedes
atacar a las posiciones de antitanques de la zona 2 o preparar tu
ataque, moviéndote más allá de las zonas de defensa.2) Las lomas
cerca de ambas bases son para antitanques y otros vehículos
francotiradores. Situándose allí servirá para defender tu base de
los ataques provenientes de la zona de los matorrales. Las lomas
además son la última línea de defensa contra el avance enemigo que
venga de la ciudad.3) En el centro la estación de tren y la base
militar proporcionan posiciones de cobertura, pero no protección
completa contra el fuego de artillería enemigo y fuego directo.
Desde aquí todavía puedes avanzar a través de la zona, moverte a
otro flanco o luchar contra algunos enemigos. La estación
proporciona algo de protección, pero no puedes avanzar desde
dentro. 4) Los bloques de la ciudad en la parte este del río es la
zona designada para los vehículos pesados. Los puentes están
cubiertos del fuego cruzado del centro del mapa, y avanzar
rápidamente hacia la esquina de la estación de tren podrá evitar el
recibir fuego enemigo que no podrás devolver. El terraplén es
curvo, lo que crea algo de cobertura, pero no deja de ser un lugar
peligroso. Los puntos clave para los pesados son las zonas
interiores y los caminos que llevan hasta ellos. Ha dos de estos
últimos, uno tiene dos bloques de cemento que te permitirán usar el
tipo de juego hull-down. Aún, en esta posición puedes ser atacados
por antitanques que se ocultan en los arbustos dentro de las zonas
interiores. El pasaje sin bloques de cemento servirá para los
tanques que utilicen la táctica de side-scrapping. Dependiendo de
los resultados del test, decidiremos que ocurre con este
mapa. 
¡Seguid
las noticias y mucha suerte en el campo de batalla!Falathi
Mikołaj kontra Krampus: Bitwa o Biegun północny
11.12.2018 12:07:42
Subject: Mikołaj kontra Krampus: Bitwa o Biegun północny
Link on message: #16433604
Msciboj, on 11 December 2018 - 12:19 AM, said: Najwiecej w tematach niedotyczacych wota. Taki agent wrogich
cypryjskich sprzedawcow cytrusow i innych mandarynek.
Link on message: #16433604
Msciboj, on 11 December 2018 - 12:19 AM, said: Najwiecej w tematach niedotyczacych wota. Taki agent wrogich
cypryjskich sprzedawcow cytrusow i innych mandarynek. Falathi: W tematach, które nie dotyczą gry z reguły nie ma embarga
informacyjnego.
eekeeboo
The Winter Challenge Rolls Out
11.12.2018 12:04:44
Subject: The Winter Challenge Rolls Out
Link on message: #16433587
EshelionBlackheart, on 11 December 2018 - 09:53 AM, said: Sure, only ammo rack are RNG. Not the 3 in a row shells
flying same way off when fully aimed at distance 100m aren't
influential at all. And then next 3 not penning side of light tank
have no influence on match at all too. All 10 penning shots below
so called "average" (not talking about killing shots obviously)
doesn't matter as well. Cause all those things aren't RNG based at
all. You may not be setting up games manually. Your
algorithms are doing it for you - MM giving one team tomato soup
while other is full of greenery, above mentioned misfortune curse
or luck blessing (cause there are games where even impossible shots
are connecting) - either you've coded it or you RNG is really
fecal.
Link on message: #16433587
EshelionBlackheart, on 11 December 2018 - 09:53 AM, said: Sure, only ammo rack are RNG. Not the 3 in a row shells
flying same way off when fully aimed at distance 100m aren't
influential at all. And then next 3 not penning side of light tank
have no influence on match at all too. All 10 penning shots below
so called "average" (not talking about killing shots obviously)
doesn't matter as well. Cause all those things aren't RNG based at
all. You may not be setting up games manually. Your
algorithms are doing it for you - MM giving one team tomato soup
while other is full of greenery, above mentioned misfortune curse
or luck blessing (cause there are games where even impossible shots
are connecting) - either you've coded it or you RNG is really
fecal.eekeeboo: Things like ammo racks aren't all RNG. Sometimes it's bad
luck being at the wrong place at the wrong time at the wrong angle
and taking 2 shots in quick succession in your ammo rack.
But part of this is also skill in knowing where to aim on a
tank for an ammo rack. Like I've said, no such algorithm, mechanic
or tin-foil fuelled theory on the manipulation and
pre-determination of matches and games.
eekeeboo
Advent Calendar: Day 11
11.12.2018 12:01:48
Subject: Advent Calendar: Day 11
Link on message: #16433573
8126Jakobsson, on 11 December 2018 - 09:59 AM, said: It does look like you had a pretty good game that one time
you played it. 
Link on message: #16433573
8126Jakobsson, on 11 December 2018 - 09:59 AM, said: It does look like you had a pretty good game that one time
you played it. eekeeboo: The joys of having a few accounts (Not to avoid bans!)
eekeeboo
Is WG killing WOT with the recent changes? Even QB seems to agree....
11.12.2018 11:48:30
Subject: Is WG killing WOT with the recent changes? Even QB seems to agree....
Link on message: #16433517
Link on message: #16433517
eekeeboo: Hello, As with the other threads, the thread sharing
videos and streams will end up being moved to the video and streams
section to avoid the spam in the game-play. If you need to
reference the video, please do so by linking to a thread where the
video is already there. There is a way to discuss this
without everyone spamming the same video (which it has). I/we
understand that people want to discuss and give their opinion on
such a hot topic. I believe it's valuable and important as long as
it's constructive, but at the same time I remember the forums when
people could just spam videos and streams and people would say
"Well why was x, y and z post allowed to stay there..." So we have
the rules we have now to prevent the spam of videos and
streams. I do care about the legitimate questions and
points made but it's important to prevent the forums from
becoming a spam-fest.
eekeeboo
Reporting for Duty
11.12.2018 11:43:49
Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16433502
Anna_Kalashnikova, on 11 December 2018 - 09:03 AM, said: en garde...
Link on message: #16433502
Anna_Kalashnikova, on 11 December 2018 - 09:03 AM, said: en garde...eekeeboo: I'm too British for this
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
11.12.2018 11:43:13
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16433501
ToodlePips, on 11 December 2018 - 09:02 AM, said: Kudos for jumping into the lion's pit, eekeeboo. I really do
hope that there will be some good news at WG fest, because patience
is really wearing thin, even among the most dedicated players.
Wargaming cannot afford any more 3-5-7 or 268/4 disasters. Remember
they say it is seven times as hard to win new customers as it is to
retain old ones.
Link on message: #16433501
ToodlePips, on 11 December 2018 - 09:02 AM, said: Kudos for jumping into the lion's pit, eekeeboo. I really do
hope that there will be some good news at WG fest, because patience
is really wearing thin, even among the most dedicated players.
Wargaming cannot afford any more 3-5-7 or 268/4 disasters. Remember
they say it is seven times as hard to win new customers as it is to
retain old ones.eekeeboo: Thank-you, unfortunately with things like 3-5-7 the
intention wasn't to break, I even remember a lot of player
excitement about the change, but as was seen, in practice things
don't always work to plan. Soon WG fest will bring the news I hope
you're looking for!
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
11.12.2018 11:40:50
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16433491
Cobra6, on 11 December 2018 - 08:08 AM, said: There seems to be a disconnect between statistically not
breaking the game and breaking the gameplay for players. Having
skirmishes swamped with Defenders is not fun in any way, it's
clearly better then the competition so it gets picked. A couple of
years ago the IS-3 was pretty dominant but despite that the
AMX100, T32, 110 and other tanks were frequently used as well.
Nowadays it's only Defenders and Patriots, stale, boring and
breaking the gameplay *for players*. Also, some can be seen as over
performing? Look at the win ratios of the tanks you are selling
compared to the competition, most are over performing and some by
quite a margin. People will not buy the premium they like,
they will buy the tank they'll win most games in as winning is fun
and losing is not. So the premium they will like most is the
premium they win with a lot. Hence why over performing premiums and
tech-tree tanks are always so popular and why it's a bad idea to
put more of them on the battlefield. They kill variation and push
all other vehicles to the back. And you are right, tech tree
tanks *CAN* be uncomfortable but in the last few years and
especially the last few tech trees there are now more uncomfortable
tanks in there then comfortable ones and we both know this didn't
used to be the case back in 2012/2013. Wargaming needs to
understand that while they will make money with all the free-XP'ing
that needs to happen to make new tanks/trees bearable, they are
scaring away/exhausting a lot of their (new) players and with the
stagnant growth, this is the last thing Wargaming can afford right
now. I always hope for good changes but honestly, pretty
soon it will be too late unless drastic changes are announced that
address issues which have been raised by the community for years.
There is more and more (public) discontent and the clock is
ticking. We don't want WoT to go away, heck speaking for myself I
still love this game despite it's many (years long) mistakes, but
it's getting harder and harder press that battle button. As
example: My brother and a good friend who've been with this game
since beta both played it for years but got sick of the problems
that didn't get fixed. They stopped playing for more then two years
and then came back to play a year ago or so. Really nice
playing WoT with them again but they've already left again as (with
their fresh perspective) they noticed the only thing Wargaming was
doing was shoveling out more premiums and perpetuating problems.
They aren't the only one and they are "old hands" for this game and
they are *STILL* running into the same issues. It's just an
example but they surely aren't the only ones. Cobra 6
Link on message: #16433491
Cobra6, on 11 December 2018 - 08:08 AM, said: There seems to be a disconnect between statistically not
breaking the game and breaking the gameplay for players. Having
skirmishes swamped with Defenders is not fun in any way, it's
clearly better then the competition so it gets picked. A couple of
years ago the IS-3 was pretty dominant but despite that the
AMX100, T32, 110 and other tanks were frequently used as well.
Nowadays it's only Defenders and Patriots, stale, boring and
breaking the gameplay *for players*. Also, some can be seen as over
performing? Look at the win ratios of the tanks you are selling
compared to the competition, most are over performing and some by
quite a margin. People will not buy the premium they like,
they will buy the tank they'll win most games in as winning is fun
and losing is not. So the premium they will like most is the
premium they win with a lot. Hence why over performing premiums and
tech-tree tanks are always so popular and why it's a bad idea to
put more of them on the battlefield. They kill variation and push
all other vehicles to the back. And you are right, tech tree
tanks *CAN* be uncomfortable but in the last few years and
especially the last few tech trees there are now more uncomfortable
tanks in there then comfortable ones and we both know this didn't
used to be the case back in 2012/2013. Wargaming needs to
understand that while they will make money with all the free-XP'ing
that needs to happen to make new tanks/trees bearable, they are
scaring away/exhausting a lot of their (new) players and with the
stagnant growth, this is the last thing Wargaming can afford right
now. I always hope for good changes but honestly, pretty
soon it will be too late unless drastic changes are announced that
address issues which have been raised by the community for years.
There is more and more (public) discontent and the clock is
ticking. We don't want WoT to go away, heck speaking for myself I
still love this game despite it's many (years long) mistakes, but
it's getting harder and harder press that battle button. As
example: My brother and a good friend who've been with this game
since beta both played it for years but got sick of the problems
that didn't get fixed. They stopped playing for more then two years
and then came back to play a year ago or so. Really nice
playing WoT with them again but they've already left again as (with
their fresh perspective) they noticed the only thing Wargaming was
doing was shoveling out more premiums and perpetuating problems.
They aren't the only one and they are "old hands" for this game and
they are *STILL* running into the same issues. It's just an
example but they surely aren't the only ones. Cobra 6eekeeboo: As mentioned before the issue with just taking a small
sample like skirmishes is that generally the most engaged kitted
out to be full gold etc. It's important the balance department
looks at the whole picture in every instance. I know most people
use premiums in things like skirmishes because of the credit making
potential just as much as the utility potential in numerous
engagements. I understand the tech tree tanks issue
too, I think this is an issue synonymous with the sheer number of
vehicles we have in game now along with a lot of new mechanics and
system changes. Combined with very different map styles (for better
or for worse) than then that suit certain play styles and tank play
styles vs the others. I too hope the balancing comes (I'm sure it
will), but I also understand the time required for such things when
other things are being balanced and changed (Sorry to repeat, but
again something that will be shared soon). I
understand the player sentiment also, my parents also play the
game, and I have a rather unique perspective on the type of players
and challenges they may face. Part of this is also not just
challenges and changes, but as you're aware, some things come and
go for people. I too generally cycle through games with shiny
events and things to do. (I'm a person who likes shiny things,
don't judge!) Once again, thanks for the feedback, I'm
sure you're already aware of the things I've mentioned, I also want
you to know I am too aware of the things you mention, but of course
I want to express it, just in case.
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
11.12.2018 11:28:16
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16433442
SoupFork, on 10 December 2018 - 07:37 PM, said: I hope there will be a physical hard limit to the number of
premium rounds a tank can carry. This will force players to actuall
think their way around an opponent, rather than pay their way.
Force them to learn weak spots, force them to flank, make them
think about saving those shots for when it really counts... make
the game exciting and dynamic again instead of spending 8 minutes
every game trying to pen the “weak” cupola of another OP Rashaaa
tank with APCR in designated corridor A, B or C with just slightly
different scenery. Like others have said, this game isn’t FUN
anymore, it’s a chore.
_flyingdutchmen, on 10 December 2018 - 07:48 PM, said: Wel. Last year I bought 2x 75 boxes and got around
76.000 gold from them(gold for tanks already owned) 10.000.000
credits, a type 59 and 90 days premium. So, I want to know is
the boxes will have the same rate (chance) of good loot in them
like last year. there was a 1:10 chance to get a tier 6 and
1:25 chance for a tier 8.
djciolos5, on 10 December 2018 - 09:42 PM, said: These gift boxes are frobidden in several states ! Ithink WG
can't sell them in Holland and / or Belgium. Do someone have the
full list where WG is forbidden to sell them this year ?
Congratulations to those states who are really protecting the
custommer. I will gladly keep my #walletclosed this year,
nothing interesting for me...especially since i learned to beat any
Defender with a Lowe.
Link on message: #16433442
SoupFork, on 10 December 2018 - 07:37 PM, said: I hope there will be a physical hard limit to the number of
premium rounds a tank can carry. This will force players to actuall
think their way around an opponent, rather than pay their way.
Force them to learn weak spots, force them to flank, make them
think about saving those shots for when it really counts... make
the game exciting and dynamic again instead of spending 8 minutes
every game trying to pen the “weak” cupola of another OP Rashaaa
tank with APCR in designated corridor A, B or C with just slightly
different scenery. Like others have said, this game isn’t FUN
anymore, it’s a chore.eekeeboo: I can't share details on it yet, but soon you will get to
see all the good news!
_flyingdutchmen, on 10 December 2018 - 07:48 PM, said: Wel. Last year I bought 2x 75 boxes and got around
76.000 gold from them(gold for tanks already owned) 10.000.000
credits, a type 59 and 90 days premium. So, I want to know is
the boxes will have the same rate (chance) of good loot in them
like last year. there was a 1:10 chance to get a tier 6 and
1:25 chance for a tier 8. eekeeboo: I thought that's what you meant and based on the fact
that the box rewards were based on chance, it's hard to say that
they will be as fortuitous as least year by nature.
djciolos5, on 10 December 2018 - 09:42 PM, said: These gift boxes are frobidden in several states ! Ithink WG
can't sell them in Holland and / or Belgium. Do someone have the
full list where WG is forbidden to sell them this year ?
Congratulations to those states who are really protecting the
custommer. I will gladly keep my #walletclosed this year,
nothing interesting for me...especially since i learned to beat any
Defender with a Lowe.eekeeboo: Only Belgium prohibits the sale of boxes like these.
eekeeboo
QB video everyone is talking about
11.12.2018 11:20:52
Subject: QB video everyone is talking about
Link on message: #16433412
psychobear, on 10 December 2018 - 03:54 PM, said: Sure, except this thread wasn't even remotely about "videos
and streams" it was all about GAMEPLAY, so it was posted in the
right section to begin with, no forum rules broken there at all.
Hell, if i remember correctly, the video itself wasn't even
posted in the opening post of the thread, it was added some posts
later by another user, so people could have a reference about the
opinions expressed in it, regarding gameplay, which was actually
the whole purpose of the thread. So yes, moving it was indeed a
manner of censorship, just like closing artillery threads on
grounds of that pathetic sticky thread you guys have made with the
sole purpose of getting any discussion of the subject drowned there
in a sea of nonsense. But hey, no problem, keep stuffing your heads
in the sand while pretending to "listen to the playerbase". It's
your game after all and nobody forces us to play it, or to pay for
it for that matter. What would be nice though is if you (WG)
actually had the balls to openly admit the truth instead of openly
taking us all for idiots, thinking we don't see things as they are.
Have a nice day!
Link on message: #16433412
psychobear, on 10 December 2018 - 03:54 PM, said: Sure, except this thread wasn't even remotely about "videos
and streams" it was all about GAMEPLAY, so it was posted in the
right section to begin with, no forum rules broken there at all.
Hell, if i remember correctly, the video itself wasn't even
posted in the opening post of the thread, it was added some posts
later by another user, so people could have a reference about the
opinions expressed in it, regarding gameplay, which was actually
the whole purpose of the thread. So yes, moving it was indeed a
manner of censorship, just like closing artillery threads on
grounds of that pathetic sticky thread you guys have made with the
sole purpose of getting any discussion of the subject drowned there
in a sea of nonsense. But hey, no problem, keep stuffing your heads
in the sand while pretending to "listen to the playerbase". It's
your game after all and nobody forces us to play it, or to pay for
it for that matter. What would be nice though is if you (WG)
actually had the balls to openly admit the truth instead of openly
taking us all for idiots, thinking we don't see things as they are.
Have a nice day!eekeeboo: I'm sure you have seen what happens when you don't move the
videos to the video section (note the 5-6 threads now of the same
video). As soon as the videos and channels are left in gameplay,
more and more people share, advertise and flaunt the stuff here.
The discussion wasn't the issue (at all), but the video in the OP
is something caused the thread to be moved. It is unfortunate that
a link to the thread wasn't left behind, but that was addressed as
soon as I came into the office yesterday with the moderation team.
If you look in the OP - there's a link to the video right
there. Censorship wasn't the intention here if it was.
Simply put the thread would have been locked, moved to junk and
hidden away with bans etc handed out. That is not something we want
or desire. We want and desire feedback, we want engaging
constructive discussion on the game. As for "sticky
threads" when you realise just how much spam there is/was about
these topics you'd understand the need for the rules we have.
You can find plenty of information and instances where the
last sentence in your statement is incorrect, you need only look to
the changes announced to important contentious things like prem
rounds and the MM changes to see that we as WG know we can do
better, want to do better and will try to do better. I
hope you have a nice day also.
eekeeboo
Wargaming: this is why your game is dying.
11.12.2018 11:12:43
Subject: Wargaming: this is why your game is dying.
Link on message: #16433387
Link on message: #16433387
eekeeboo: I apologise for my absence during a lot of discussions, I hope you
understand joining the team at Christmas time and keeping a hold of
everything is keeping me occupied. I will say, please stay on topic
and don't spam the same message and video. If you want
to highlight the video to make your points, please just link to a
current thread already up with the video in it, not spamming the
forums with the same message. To help with this, the original
thread is here. Furthermore, I ask people to stay
on-topic, discuss in a constructive manner and please avoid
personal or insulting attacks. This is the best way to avoid
moderation actions, which happens not for censorship, but to ensure
the forums don't devolve into the worst case scenario.
eekeeboo
Discover the Decals from Update 1.3
11.12.2018 10:53:40
Subject: Discover the Decals from Update 1.3
Link on message: #16433320
Brawling_Drunkard, on 10 December 2018 - 09:09 PM, said: So... more clutter, bells and whistles nobody asked for, and NO
work on the issues we have been talking about for AGES. You know -
the ones you 'promised' to address?
But what the hell. Everyone like to decorate their house - even if the windows are broken and the doors are off the hinges right?
Link on message: #16433320
Brawling_Drunkard, on 10 December 2018 - 09:09 PM, said: So... more clutter, bells and whistles nobody asked for, and NO
work on the issues we have been talking about for AGES. You know -
the ones you 'promised' to address?But what the hell. Everyone like to decorate their house - even if the windows are broken and the doors are off the hinges right?
eekeeboo: You need only look at most interactions lately informing you
of the announcements coming at WG-Fest on the way.
eekeeboo
Warm Up for the Holidays With New Missions
11.12.2018 10:49:03
Subject: Warm Up for the Holidays With New Missions
Link on message: #16433303
Joggaman, on 10 December 2018 - 06:01 PM, said: I have a reward for you. Draw a fish and I will
give you a lifelong membership in the Dingers Community!
Link on message: #16433303
Joggaman, on 10 December 2018 - 06:01 PM, said: I have a reward for you. Draw a fish and I will
give you a lifelong membership in the Dingers Community!eekeeboo: Christmas miracle happening right here!
eekeeboo
Advent Calendar: Day 11
11.12.2018 10:48:02
Subject: Advent Calendar: Day 11
Link on message: #16433299
Link on message: #16433299
eekeeboo: I quite liked this tank. Not on the top of my list, as mentioned I
love my T44-100 but it's far better than I thought it would be when
I got it through the marathon!
eekeeboo
Reporting for Duty
11.12.2018 10:28:02
Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16433226
Axelfoley666, on 10 December 2018 - 05:12 PM, said: Pah, I snort in your general direction you scallywag.
Link on message: #16433226
Axelfoley666, on 10 December 2018 - 05:12 PM, said: Pah, I snort in your general direction you scallywag.eekeeboo: 
On-guard!
On-guard! eekeeboo
Last Chance to Get the SU-130PM
10.12.2018 21:19:54
Subject: Last Chance to Get the SU-130PM
Link on message: #16431854
Rittmeister39, on 10 December 2018 - 04:17 PM, said: I completed the Marathon yesterday, grats me, got the TD but not
the 3 days Premium Account. Is that normal and they'll award it
later or should I open a ticket? cheers
Link on message: #16431854
Rittmeister39, on 10 December 2018 - 04:17 PM, said: I completed the Marathon yesterday, grats me, got the TD but not
the 3 days Premium Account. Is that normal and they'll award it
later or should I open a ticket? cheerseekeeboo: Please let me know if you still haven't received.
eekeeboo
WG Store: 24 Hours of Free Shipping & Hardware Bundles
10.12.2018 20:58:40
Subject: WG Store: 24 Hours of Free Shipping & Hardware Bundles
Link on message: #16431792
Owi, on 08 December 2018 - 09:53 AM, said: bought something on 24.11 - not arrived yet! =( support said it is
missing - comeone guys dont steal - you know i have to shoot you
for that stuipedness!
Link on message: #16431792
Owi, on 08 December 2018 - 09:53 AM, said: bought something on 24.11 - not arrived yet! =( support said it is
missing - comeone guys dont steal - you know i have to shoot you
for that stuipedness!eekeeboo: Please contact the site and check your shipping. We are not
able to help you on the forums.
eekeeboo
Buff Grille 15 already..
10.12.2018 20:35:05
Subject: Buff Grille 15 already..
Link on message: #16431696
Sfinski, on 07 December 2018 - 06:19 PM, said: Yet you have not provided any arguments on why that is so.
Ive told you that those basic steps can be taken way faster. You
blaming me to not wanting to take in account what you've said,
while you've completely ignored ALL the arguments I have provided.
Give me tools and I'll prove it to you. I'll balance 430U
for you for example. In a week.
Igor_BL, on 07 December 2018 - 06:32 PM, said: I understand that his "job" is to defend company decisions.
You can explain the process behind balancing, their ideas behind
some tank buffs or nerfs, etc. But you can not defend tanks like
old e5, 268v4, type5 etc.
You simply can not.
Just take graphs how those tanks are performing across the playerbase, and you will see that they are overperforming by huge margin.
(ok, meaby type5 is not that much as e5 or 268v4 were, but it is still broken and gamebraking tank) tanks that are boosting players avg winrate for 5% can not be balanced, no matter what. You need to nerf them instantly. And not to "collect data" for years.
Strizi, on 07 December 2018 - 06:44 PM, said: For tanks that are a bit too strong or weak i could agree
with you to gather data for a longer time. For tanks like
268-4 that are so much stronger (Or Leopard 1 for the so much
weaker tanks) that everyone can smell it 10km against the wind (or
however you say that in english) the only thing i can say is: if wg
will insist on not nerfing these tanks fast with hotfixes they will
keep infuriating players. You can nerf these tanks for 5 or 10%
with a fast hotfix and after that gather data. If you needed 6
months to realise that 268-4 was completely broken i suggest to
send wg balancing department to the dota 2 devs, they rebalance the
game on a regular basis and dont need months for overpowered
heroes. Why can they do it and wg cant? I assure you - players do
not understand and agree with these discrepancies. But go on and
keep defending the undefendable as igor_bl said.
laulaur, on 08 December 2018 - 12:34 AM, said: Is anybody here that thinks a buff on the bloom of Grille
would make it OP? I don't think that a slow paper TD that
can't even rotate his turret 360 degrees, being able to shoot
something before that something get in cover would be so strong.
Grille has 0.26 precision on paper, but in reality you can't hit a
weakspot..... Let's take a look how tier X TD's are
performing 268v4 is still the best despite being nerfed and despite
being the most recent introduced in game. Balance much, such wow
STRV has been added also after Grille , performs much better.
FV4005 has been buffed because reasons. Badger, another new
introduced TD is outperforming the oldies. This means only 2
things: 1. WG is promoting the 'flavour of the month' tanks to make
players spend money (free xp conversion to get the op tank,premium
account and reserves bought to fast grind) or to make people play
more and grind them. 2. WG is unable to balance tanks, because they
are incompetent. (no offense) 
Swoopie, on 08 December 2018 - 12:44 AM, said: Players said the most recent buffs to Maus (Where it got a
decent DPM and health buff along with other small gun handling
buffs) would make it OP. You released it anyway. And it needed to
be nerfed later due to over performing way above what was expected.
Players said 268v4 would be OP. You released it anyway in the state
it was and took half a year to deal with it. Players said 907
didn't need buffs. You buffed it anyway and now it's the only
proper choice for a medium in competitive modes (As it has been
ever since it was released back in the 3rd campaign). Players
said the Type 5 would be broken (Not OP, broken, hope you know the
difference). You buffed it anyway and imo it's one of the most
unfun regular tanks to play against (I know this is more of a
personal opinion, but point still stands). Then you've had
ideas such as: http://forum.worldof...e-autoreloader/ Like it
doesn't take long to figure out that, this mechanic would've
effectively given Is3A the best of both worlds. You enter a battle
with a full clip, first burst the 3 shells out, then keep firing as
soon as you're reloaded to maximize your DPM. There would've been
literally no downsides to emptying your clip. I'm fully aware this
was only on Supertest but the fact that you needed to even test
something like this to conclude you cant really balance it properly
(At least that's what I'm assuming why you didn't introduce this in
the end) makes me question the competence of your balancing
team. So why are you trying to change all of this at
once then? Introducing new mechanics which alter the meta in major
ways and changing old tanks, all while introducing new
tanks/complete lines. On top of that you're making map changes
(Which arent imo playing as big of a role in all of this balancing
mess as you make it seem to be). Now I'm aware that it might
be a challenge to make tanks that are unique, fun to play and ones
that are not utterly useless. But honestly I see no reason why you
need to wait half a year to balance a obviously broken tank when
you could make slight changes to it in weekly or bi-weekly mini
patches and see how it goes from there. There are already
some examples where you've got it right, for example Kranvagn. The
1st test version was just a better 50B pretty much, but for the
later tests you managed to make it unique and it fills a niche
role while being decently balanced.
Igor_BL, on 08 December 2018 - 10:49 AM, said: Just look at those stats posted by @laulaur. Look where old
object 263 is. After horrible grind, you get the really good
tank.
Tank that was fun. That was balanced. Great armor, but with weakspots. proper weakspots. Great gun. ammo loadout wasnt p2w, because AP was fantastic with 290mm and APCR was 330? something like that. Players usually used AP on it, there was rarelly any 263 spamming full APCR like SQ, 50b, T57 etc. Great armor, fast, fun, amazing gun/DPM, UNIQUE tank. It had its niche. Then wargaming decided to implement 268v4, most gamebraking tank ever.
And to rub more salt into wounds, they wrote an article, how WE, PLAYERS, WANTED them to remove 263, how everyone was complaining about that tank, and thus they decided to rework whole line. Players never complained about object263. (ofc, some random ones were, but like playerbase - no.) We complained about su100m1, su101 and that awful su12254 Those 3 tanks needed rework, buffs, tweaks. And so that they could justife their abomination of 268v4, they wrote how WE WANTED THEM TO DO THAT. Instead reworking lower tiers, they removed 263, and made whole line yolo-brainless-proof. HOW CAN SOMEONE think that 268v4 is better for the game then 263. And then same people talk to us, how balancing is hard. You add 268v4 and talk about balancing.
ares354, on 09 December 2018 - 03:33 PM, said: Tell me something How much data you have about Tiger II or
T34-2.
WHO are UP for past 4 years ? Pls enlighten me
Link on message: #16431696
Sfinski, on 07 December 2018 - 06:19 PM, said: Yet you have not provided any arguments on why that is so.
Ive told you that those basic steps can be taken way faster. You
blaming me to not wanting to take in account what you've said,
while you've completely ignored ALL the arguments I have provided.
Give me tools and I'll prove it to you. I'll balance 430U
for you for example. In a week.eekeeboo: I told you the gathering and assessment of data, this is not
something you do in an hour or a day. This stage alone, you have
chosen not to look at anything other than what you want to.
Igor_BL, on 07 December 2018 - 06:32 PM, said: I understand that his "job" is to defend company decisions.
You can explain the process behind balancing, their ideas behind
some tank buffs or nerfs, etc. But you can not defend tanks like
old e5, 268v4, type5 etc.You simply can not.
Just take graphs how those tanks are performing across the playerbase, and you will see that they are overperforming by huge margin.
(ok, meaby type5 is not that much as e5 or 268v4 were, but it is still broken and gamebraking tank) tanks that are boosting players avg winrate for 5% can not be balanced, no matter what. You need to nerf them instantly. And not to "collect data" for years.
eekeeboo: But like anything else the best data is data you gather on
the live server, assess it on performance and change from there. I
mentioned previously that this is no small task, if it could be
done faster and quicker, then it would be. I'm sure many people
involved in the process would love it, if it were that
simple.
Strizi, on 07 December 2018 - 06:44 PM, said: For tanks that are a bit too strong or weak i could agree
with you to gather data for a longer time. For tanks like
268-4 that are so much stronger (Or Leopard 1 for the so much
weaker tanks) that everyone can smell it 10km against the wind (or
however you say that in english) the only thing i can say is: if wg
will insist on not nerfing these tanks fast with hotfixes they will
keep infuriating players. You can nerf these tanks for 5 or 10%
with a fast hotfix and after that gather data. If you needed 6
months to realise that 268-4 was completely broken i suggest to
send wg balancing department to the dota 2 devs, they rebalance the
game on a regular basis and dont need months for overpowered
heroes. Why can they do it and wg cant? I assure you - players do
not understand and agree with these discrepancies. But go on and
keep defending the undefendable as igor_bl said.eekeeboo: Those balances come from the same map and not a lot of
deviation on the meta. As soon as you have different maps,
introduce new items or someone discovered a funky combo you
suddenly break everything. Then you spend a few months waiting for
the OP to be nerfed or the item to be changed to bring it in line
not to be a run-away. There's a lot more to balancing Tanks with
the different maps, match-ups and the way the teams are a lot
bigger and the things each tank will face in situations the data
sample is a whole lot bigger.
laulaur, on 08 December 2018 - 12:34 AM, said: Is anybody here that thinks a buff on the bloom of Grille
would make it OP? I don't think that a slow paper TD that
can't even rotate his turret 360 degrees, being able to shoot
something before that something get in cover would be so strong.
Grille has 0.26 precision on paper, but in reality you can't hit a
weakspot..... Let's take a look how tier X TD's are
performing 268v4 is still the best despite being nerfed and despite
being the most recent introduced in game. Balance much, such wow
STRV has been added also after Grille , performs much better.
FV4005 has been buffed because reasons. Badger, another new
introduced TD is outperforming the oldies. This means only 2
things: 1. WG is promoting the 'flavour of the month' tanks to make
players spend money (free xp conversion to get the op tank,premium
account and reserves bought to fast grind) or to make people play
more and grind them. 2. WG is unable to balance tanks, because they
are incompetent. (no offense) eekeeboo: With the data sampling you have to be careful. When tanks
first come out you tend to have the best, most experienced and
players with enough credits and free xp to spare. As well as
competitive players who want to get that 3 MOE early. It takes time
for that data set of "average" players (I hope you get what I mean
by this and not as an insult to anyone). So that all players of all
backgrounds, styles, and demographics have had time to earn it and
play it and then you balance it. As soon as you buff or nerf
something, something else is guaranteed to take its place. Thise
"meta" swings are hard to not make worse considering the depth and
complexity of the game and the things needing to be assessed.
Swoopie, on 08 December 2018 - 12:44 AM, said: Players said the most recent buffs to Maus (Where it got a
decent DPM and health buff along with other small gun handling
buffs) would make it OP. You released it anyway. And it needed to
be nerfed later due to over performing way above what was expected.
Players said 268v4 would be OP. You released it anyway in the state
it was and took half a year to deal with it. Players said 907
didn't need buffs. You buffed it anyway and now it's the only
proper choice for a medium in competitive modes (As it has been
ever since it was released back in the 3rd campaign). Players
said the Type 5 would be broken (Not OP, broken, hope you know the
difference). You buffed it anyway and imo it's one of the most
unfun regular tanks to play against (I know this is more of a
personal opinion, but point still stands). Then you've had
ideas such as: http://forum.worldof...e-autoreloader/ Like it
doesn't take long to figure out that, this mechanic would've
effectively given Is3A the best of both worlds. You enter a battle
with a full clip, first burst the 3 shells out, then keep firing as
soon as you're reloaded to maximize your DPM. There would've been
literally no downsides to emptying your clip. I'm fully aware this
was only on Supertest but the fact that you needed to even test
something like this to conclude you cant really balance it properly
(At least that's what I'm assuming why you didn't introduce this in
the end) makes me question the competence of your balancing
team. So why are you trying to change all of this at
once then? Introducing new mechanics which alter the meta in major
ways and changing old tanks, all while introducing new
tanks/complete lines. On top of that you're making map changes
(Which arent imo playing as big of a role in all of this balancing
mess as you make it seem to be). Now I'm aware that it might
be a challenge to make tanks that are unique, fun to play and ones
that are not utterly useless. But honestly I see no reason why you
need to wait half a year to balance a obviously broken tank when
you could make slight changes to it in weekly or bi-weekly mini
patches and see how it goes from there. There are already
some examples where you've got it right, for example Kranvagn. The
1st test version was just a better 50B pretty much, but for the
later tests you managed to make it unique and it fills a niche
role while being decently balanced. eekeeboo: I can't say too much to the feedback from the earlier tests.
But something I can say is that you should always be aware of just
taking the word of the most engaged player-base who generally do
test tanks and then offer feedback vs the "general" player base. It
is unfortunate that those tanks were released that way (I remember
the WT E100) but it's not always the case (Swedish Tanks).
For the map issues, to give but a small example, the Swedish
TDs were popular for one major reason, which was their ability to
get to places most tanks couldn't and thus farm damage and wins
others could only dream of. That's just one instance where map
consideration is just as important as hard and soft stats.
Igor_BL, on 08 December 2018 - 10:49 AM, said: Just look at those stats posted by @laulaur. Look where old
object 263 is. After horrible grind, you get the really good
tank.Tank that was fun. That was balanced. Great armor, but with weakspots. proper weakspots. Great gun. ammo loadout wasnt p2w, because AP was fantastic with 290mm and APCR was 330? something like that. Players usually used AP on it, there was rarelly any 263 spamming full APCR like SQ, 50b, T57 etc. Great armor, fast, fun, amazing gun/DPM, UNIQUE tank. It had its niche. Then wargaming decided to implement 268v4, most gamebraking tank ever.
And to rub more salt into wounds, they wrote an article, how WE, PLAYERS, WANTED them to remove 263, how everyone was complaining about that tank, and thus they decided to rework whole line. Players never complained about object263. (ofc, some random ones were, but like playerbase - no.) We complained about su100m1, su101 and that awful su12254 Those 3 tanks needed rework, buffs, tweaks. And so that they could justife their abomination of 268v4, they wrote how WE WANTED THEM TO DO THAT. Instead reworking lower tiers, they removed 263, and made whole line yolo-brainless-proof. HOW CAN SOMEONE think that 268v4 is better for the game then 263. And then same people talk to us, how balancing is hard. You add 268v4 and talk about balancing.
eekeeboo: Please look above about player demographics.
ares354, on 09 December 2018 - 03:33 PM, said: Tell me something How much data you have about Tiger II or
T34-2. WHO are UP for past 4 years ? Pls enlighten me
eekeeboo: But again, are they UP in top config, stock config?
etc.
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 20:19:14
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431632
Codename_Jelly, on 10 December 2018 - 05:36 PM, said: Since it seems you are doing the ornament thing again this
year will you be carrying over last years progress? If not I
am not going to bother playing because i was unable to get through
to the holiday skin I was focusing on due to the crap RNG system.
wsatnutter, on 10 December 2018 - 05:40 PM, said: I am indeed team krampus or will be
Igor_BL, on 10 December 2018 - 05:49 PM, said: @eekeeboo, what is your personal opinion - are Lefh and Defender
good for gameplay?
For randoms and for tier8 SH? Do you think this game would be better or worse without them? Edit:
about whole this "gambling" thing.... While I am not fan of WG moves in last 2-3 years, I see nothing wrong there. Yes, problem was type59, but then again, it is players fault if they choose to spend a lot on lootboxes.
In any scenario, for same amount of money, you got more gold/premium time in lootboxes then you would get "regular way". for players that are buying gold and premium time, I think lootboxes are really good deal.
fighting_falcon93, on 10 December 2018 - 06:03 PM, said: Nooooooooo, you can't write stuff like that and then just
finish it with a "soon" 
Hmm can we atleast get some
kind of estimate? This week? Next week? 
Link on message: #16431632
Codename_Jelly, on 10 December 2018 - 05:36 PM, said: Since it seems you are doing the ornament thing again this
year will you be carrying over last years progress? If not I
am not going to bother playing because i was unable to get through
to the holiday skin I was focusing on due to the crap RNG system.eekeeboo: The ornament system restarts every year. - I will
double check, but the last 2 years have seen players start again
from the beginning.
wsatnutter, on 10 December 2018 - 05:40 PM, said: I am indeed team krampus or will beeekeeboo: Huzzah! I expect you will recruit your whole clan, we need
more Krampus support!
Igor_BL, on 10 December 2018 - 05:49 PM, said: @eekeeboo, what is your personal opinion - are Lefh and Defender
good for gameplay?For randoms and for tier8 SH? Do you think this game would be better or worse without them? Edit:
about whole this "gambling" thing.... While I am not fan of WG moves in last 2-3 years, I see nothing wrong there. Yes, problem was type59, but then again, it is players fault if they choose to spend a lot on lootboxes.
In any scenario, for same amount of money, you got more gold/premium time in lootboxes then you would get "regular way". for players that are buying gold and premium time, I think lootboxes are really good deal.
eekeeboo: I have played both, I personally don't feel either give an
advantage over other tanks at the tier. Like I stated the player
means far more than the tank. I've had amazing games in the Lef,
others I've been trolled with RNG and had a nightmare. The defender
I've not played too much at all but never had an issue facing
one.
fighting_falcon93, on 10 December 2018 - 06:03 PM, said: Nooooooooo, you can't write stuff like that and then just
finish it with a "soon" Hmm can we atleast get some
kind of estimate? This week? Next week? eekeeboo: DECEMBER 15 - 12:00 - 23:00 should be the date. I hope to
share more soon sorry 
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 20:09:58
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431601
restore, on 10 December 2018 - 06:07 PM, said: eekeeboo, its a nice thing to get some feedback. The thing is, its
hard to say if you actually have any talking into some highly
questionable decisions made by someone, or you are just that poor
guy with a job to communicate with us in possitive manner, which is
probably terrible job to defend those decisions. Yet if there are
really some changes planned, most people will be happy with those.
But to actual question about these new skins. They will be
clearly not hitboxes, yet (lets take is7) will it be possible to
spot such a tank with machine gun on top just by spotting it? Also
if not, will those parts of the skin be highlighted while aiming at
them? It could be hard for inexperienced players to avoid shooting
these as a part of the tank. This is probably more relevant in
future when there will be much more of these skins.
Link on message: #16431601
restore, on 10 December 2018 - 06:07 PM, said: eekeeboo, its a nice thing to get some feedback. The thing is, its
hard to say if you actually have any talking into some highly
questionable decisions made by someone, or you are just that poor
guy with a job to communicate with us in possitive manner, which is
probably terrible job to defend those decisions. Yet if there are
really some changes planned, most people will be happy with those.
But to actual question about these new skins. They will be
clearly not hitboxes, yet (lets take is7) will it be possible to
spot such a tank with machine gun on top just by spotting it? Also
if not, will those parts of the skin be highlighted while aiming at
them? It could be hard for inexperienced players to avoid shooting
these as a part of the tank. This is probably more relevant in
future when there will be much more of these skins.eekeeboo: I can assure you there will be news coming. I cannot say
that they will be 100% good and loved by all, but I am looking
forward to being able to share more information 
I will double check,
but I believe the hitboxes will stay as they currently are, the
machine gun for instance will be like it used to be when it stood
tall and proud, with not hitbox but still visible. (Again i will
check this so please don't take as 100% correct answer).
I will double check,
but I believe the hitboxes will stay as they currently are, the
machine gun for instance will be like it used to be when it stood
tall and proud, with not hitbox but still visible. (Again i will
check this so please don't take as 100% correct answer). eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 20:07:40
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431589
GetFoched, on 10 December 2018 - 04:47 PM, said: Why does this answer feel like dust in the wind?
Is it because every suggestion the community contributors made in the past (including at events like tankfest where they got to talk directly to WG employers) got completely ignored?
Dunno, maybe it's just my impression, but the selection of tanks for this event really proves you don't give a foch to player's feedback and feels like you just want to see if skins might me the way to go for the future, again, using the event as a guinea pig.
I really, REALLY, like the skins, it was about time you put them in. I would litterally buy a skin for every single tank I have in order to contribute in some way to this game that i love and not by buying poorly though out and unbalanced tanks that on the other hand ruin the game. (Just as in League of Legends, where RIOT actually cares about the game's health and mostly makes money with skins/events).
I quote on what Cobra6 said, could not agree more to be honest.
Please sort your stuff out.
GetFoched
Link on message: #16431589
GetFoched, on 10 December 2018 - 04:47 PM, said: Why does this answer feel like dust in the wind? Is it because every suggestion the community contributors made in the past (including at events like tankfest where they got to talk directly to WG employers) got completely ignored?
Dunno, maybe it's just my impression, but the selection of tanks for this event really proves you don't give a foch to player's feedback and feels like you just want to see if skins might me the way to go for the future, again, using the event as a guinea pig.
I really, REALLY, like the skins, it was about time you put them in. I would litterally buy a skin for every single tank I have in order to contribute in some way to this game that i love and not by buying poorly though out and unbalanced tanks that on the other hand ruin the game. (Just as in League of Legends, where RIOT actually cares about the game's health and mostly makes money with skins/events).
I quote on what Cobra6 said, could not agree more to be honest.
Please sort your stuff out.
GetFoched
eekeeboo: To be clear I never make the promise feedback = change. I
can gather it, note it and pass it on. After that, then decisions
are made for the whole player base and population. It's not in the
wind, it's here and being passed on. So it's good to rephrase your
last line. Thank-you for the feedback non-the-less.
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 19:55:27
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431544
_flyingdutchmen, on 10 December 2018 - 02:04 PM, said: Can anyone from WG confirm that the Boxes will be as
lucrative as last year?
Link on message: #16431544
_flyingdutchmen, on 10 December 2018 - 02:04 PM, said: Can anyone from WG confirm that the Boxes will be as
lucrative as last year? eekeeboo: How do you mean sorry?
vuque
Noel Baba x Krampus: Kuzey Kutbu Savaşı
10.12.2018 19:51:19
Subject: Noel Baba x Krampus: Kuzey Kutbu Savaşı
Link on message: #16431525
Spartiat777, on 10 December 2018 - 06:38 PM, said: Bak anket yapmışlar, Noel Baba önde: http://forum.worldof...-mi-krampus-mu/
Link on message: #16431525
Spartiat777, on 10 December 2018 - 06:38 PM, said: Bak anket yapmışlar, Noel Baba önde: http://forum.worldof...-mi-krampus-mu/vuque: Güzel insiyatif! Keşke ben sormadan önce yapılsayd!
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 19:49:18
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431516
AnCh, on 10 December 2018 - 11:35 AM, said: A previously good and balanced game (a lot of years back...) that
turned into a damn "PAY2WIN for full GOLD ammo for even more
impotent and incompetent players" game... I am really sick of all
this and I strongly believe that this is the first thing WG should
work on this game but they are glad the game goes on with only the
"mommy's wallet" boys. So be it; I will enter this game
only for the short times of freebies or even in a lower amount
if not completely delete it in favor of the Steam games. Please let me know when the armor will be really
efficient and not paper because of all this gold ammo spamming.
Limit the number of gold ammo availability and you will have a lot
more players, honest and good ones that will play this game and pay
for premium account not premium ammo to have a good lasting game...
Link on message: #16431516
AnCh, on 10 December 2018 - 11:35 AM, said: A previously good and balanced game (a lot of years back...) that
turned into a damn "PAY2WIN for full GOLD ammo for even more
impotent and incompetent players" game... I am really sick of all
this and I strongly believe that this is the first thing WG should
work on this game but they are glad the game goes on with only the
"mommy's wallet" boys. So be it; I will enter this game
only for the short times of freebies or even in a lower amount
if not completely delete it in favor of the Steam games. Please let me know when the armor will be really
efficient and not paper because of all this gold ammo spamming.
Limit the number of gold ammo availability and you will have a lot
more players, honest and good ones that will play this game and pay
for premium account not premium ammo to have a good lasting game...eekeeboo: It is unfortunate you still believe this to be the case. I
remember the premium ammo change to remove the "pay-to-win". There
are also changes to this mechanic coming and will be revealed soon
at WG fest.
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 19:33:43
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431453
JaceCze, on 10 December 2018 - 03:54 PM, said: LefH, Deffender, IS3-A (autoloader).... Do I have to
continue ? Please, Wg, stop. We are not that st*pid 
Stop acting like you DO care about the game or the
community. I know that this game is F2P and you need money to run
it but there are tons of different ways to do it, better
ways.
KinkyTail, on 10 December 2018 - 04:02 PM, said: Only got one question. Why wasnt there a new vehicle in the
options. I have all of them so there is no point for me in buying
them. And there are enough tanks already in the gameafiles that
would be intersting enough for me to try a few boxes. Now I will
just simply ignore the looting part of this event.
wsatnutter, on 10 December 2018 - 04:02 PM, said: you pays your money you take your choice im buying a few as
presents
Sfinski, on 10 December 2018 - 04:09 PM, said: The experience is already broken for us and you want it to
be even more broken. Nothing sustainable in this. Please
continue ignoring the playerbase. That's all you do.
KinkyTail, on 10 December 2018 - 04:11 PM, said: Than we have different views on these boxes. As I mentioned
above in an earlier post if you are buying them for the tanks you
are doing it wrong to begin with. But that is my humble opinion.
Cobra6, on 10 December 2018 - 04:16 PM, said: Thanks for the reply, it's good to see some staff
participation in these discussions. It's been long overdue
My point was not to compare WoT to other games
which have perished in the meantime ever since WoT was released.
The point was that with continuing to sell blatantly over
performing tanks *AND* at the same time making the "new player"
experience atrocious with horrible stock grinds all the way up to
tier 8, you are actually speeding up the decline. Years ago
WG already claimed to want to address premium ammo yet the only
thing they've managed is to up-armor all the heavily armored tanks
to make premium ammo even more compulsory then it was 4-5 years
ago. As for this: "I would like to counter is that we will
always aim to do this in a sustainable way, without breaking the
game experience for players. ", I'd argue that if you
willingly sell vehicles which are over-performing you are not doing
anything in a sustainable way apart from lining your pockets with
cash as large numbers of these tanks have a negative effect on the
overall game experience (not just randoms). T8 skirmishes are
already nothing but Defenders all the time which should tell you
enough. My original post is not about Wargaming not making
changes, you are. Thing is you're not changing the important things
(not just according to me but if you read around according to a
large part of your audience here) fast enough and focussing on
things which are nice, but not critically needed (graphics and
physics). The problem with WoT is that the *GAMEPLAY* has become
worse and worse, more and more basic and thus more and more boring
over the years, it hasn't improved in any of the important areas
and it's starting to take it's toll in player numbers but also in
the feedback on here, on youtube and on blogs. Cobra 6
Valkyrie_Hound, on 10 December 2018 - 04:37 PM, said: Really good response. As you are member of WG staff I have
no reason whatsoever to doubt your reply. I feel so much better
now.
Link on message: #16431453
JaceCze, on 10 December 2018 - 03:54 PM, said: LefH, Deffender, IS3-A (autoloader).... Do I have to
continue ? Please, Wg, stop. We are not that st*pid Stop acting like you DO care about the game or the
community. I know that this game is F2P and you need money to run
it but there are tons of different ways to do it, better
ways. eekeeboo: These tanks have been available in the past and did they
break the game? If I didn't care about the community I wouldn't be
here posting and replying to every comment and on the forums on the
weekend or replying to people out of work hours. While feedback is
most welcome, I suggest you not to question how much I care about
the community and this game. I've been a part of this from the days
when WoT was a base of what it is now.
KinkyTail, on 10 December 2018 - 04:02 PM, said: Only got one question. Why wasnt there a new vehicle in the
options. I have all of them so there is no point for me in buying
them. And there are enough tanks already in the gameafiles that
would be intersting enough for me to try a few boxes. Now I will
just simply ignore the looting part of this event.eekeeboo: There will be more announcements coming soon, with more info.
Hopefully, you can have your answers there. Unfortunately, there
will always be tanks some players have them and others not. That's
why the main appeal of the boxes isn't just the tanks but the
vanity items.
wsatnutter, on 10 December 2018 - 04:02 PM, said: you pays your money you take your choice im buying a few as
presentseekeeboo: I hope you're #TeamKrampus!
Sfinski, on 10 December 2018 - 04:09 PM, said: The experience is already broken for us and you want it to
be even more broken. Nothing sustainable in this. Please
continue ignoring the playerbase. That's all you do.eekeeboo: Ignoring would be not gathering feedback, not reading and
reply and not providing information about the changes coming in
WG-Fest. We do more than that.
KinkyTail, on 10 December 2018 - 04:11 PM, said: Than we have different views on these boxes. As I mentioned
above in an earlier post if you are buying them for the tanks you
are doing it wrong to begin with. But that is my humble opinion.eekeeboo: This is the intention, hopefully more people see it
soon!
Cobra6, on 10 December 2018 - 04:16 PM, said: Thanks for the reply, it's good to see some staff
participation in these discussions. It's been long overdue
My point was not to compare WoT to other games
which have perished in the meantime ever since WoT was released.
The point was that with continuing to sell blatantly over
performing tanks *AND* at the same time making the "new player"
experience atrocious with horrible stock grinds all the way up to
tier 8, you are actually speeding up the decline. Years ago
WG already claimed to want to address premium ammo yet the only
thing they've managed is to up-armor all the heavily armored tanks
to make premium ammo even more compulsory then it was 4-5 years
ago. As for this: "I would like to counter is that we will
always aim to do this in a sustainable way, without breaking the
game experience for players. ", I'd argue that if you
willingly sell vehicles which are over-performing you are not doing
anything in a sustainable way apart from lining your pockets with
cash as large numbers of these tanks have a negative effect on the
overall game experience (not just randoms). T8 skirmishes are
already nothing but Defenders all the time which should tell you
enough. My original post is not about Wargaming not making
changes, you are. Thing is you're not changing the important things
(not just according to me but if you read around according to a
large part of your audience here) fast enough and focussing on
things which are nice, but not critically needed (graphics and
physics). The problem with WoT is that the *GAMEPLAY* has become
worse and worse, more and more basic and thus more and more boring
over the years, it hasn't improved in any of the important areas
and it's starting to take it's toll in player numbers but also in
the feedback on here, on youtube and on blogs. Cobra 6eekeeboo: Apologies for the long time taken for the reply, Monday is
feedback day and at Christmas time things get VERY busy.
For the changes, as said, there will be more announcements
soon from the WG-Fest. I'm sorry I can't say more than that for
now. The past sale of these vehicles show that they don't break the
game, though some can be seen to "over-perform", people will
generally get a premium they like the playstyle and find
it comfortable to play, whereas other tanks, especially tech
tree ones can be uncomfortable for some people in order to get to
the tank they really want. Hopefully, some of the
upcoming announcements will provide you with some cool information
and changes that have been planned for a while that hopefully
improve the experience for all... soon!
Valkyrie_Hound, on 10 December 2018 - 04:37 PM, said: Really good response. As you are member of WG staff I have
no reason whatsoever to doubt your reply. I feel so much better
now.eekeeboo: Thank-you! I am happy to see you have the utmost trust and
respect for WG staff and this means a lot! I am happy to help and
be able to bring you joy and happiness in time for
Christmas.
Sael_
Al Supertest: Hotchkiss EBR
10.12.2018 19:29:30
Subject: Al Supertest: Hotchkiss EBR
Link on message: #16431434
Link on message: #16431434
Sael_: In arrivo sul Supertest quest'oggi è il carro su ruote francese di
livello VII, lo Hotchkiss EBR. Controlleremo il bilanciamento dei
parametri e continueremo a testare in battaglia le nuove meccaniche
di gioco! Quando avremo finito, decideremo quale settaggio di
meccaniche rilasciare all'interno del gioco e finalizzeremo
l'intera mini-linea dei carri su ruote. 
Lo Hotchkiss EBR è un veicolo "di transizione" che
introduce i giocatori al gameplay particolare dei carri su ruote in
cima alla linea. Gli mancano le due modalità di guida di questi
ultimi, ma possiede l'abilità di carica e la capacità di incollarsi
al terreno. Ha anche un cannone dotato di autoricarica da 75mm. Le
dinamiche e la manovrabilità dello Hotchkiss EBR sono più basse di
quelli dei carri dal livello VIII al X. In aggiunta, l'assenza
della modalità guida veloce risulterà in una velocità massima più
bassa. 
A seconda dei risultati del test, i parametri dello
Hotchkiss EBR potrebbero cambiare. Continuate a seguirci e buona
fortuna in battaglia!
Lo Hotchkiss EBR è un veicolo "di transizione" che
introduce i giocatori al gameplay particolare dei carri su ruote in
cima alla linea. Gli mancano le due modalità di guida di questi
ultimi, ma possiede l'abilità di carica e la capacità di incollarsi
al terreno. Ha anche un cannone dotato di autoricarica da 75mm. Le
dinamiche e la manovrabilità dello Hotchkiss EBR sono più basse di
quelli dei carri dal livello VIII al X. In aggiunta, l'assenza
della modalità guida veloce risulterà in una velocità massima più
bassa. 
A seconda dei risultati del test, i parametri dello
Hotchkiss EBR potrebbero cambiare. Continuate a seguirci e buona
fortuna in battaglia! Actinid
Un coup de main pour les Opés des fêtes
10.12.2018 19:19:52
Subject: Un coup de main pour les Opés des fêtes
Link on message: #16431393
Demerdenzizich, on 10 December 2018 - 03:53 PM, said: Je me faisais déjà insulter de "muslim pig" quand un joueur (pour
qui je soupçonne que papa et tonton sont une seule et unique
personne) reconnaissait le drapeau français mais là le camo du
BatChat c'est la porte ouverte aux insultes du même genre.
Et sinon ce serait bien d'avoir une réponse officielle à ces 2
questions: - y aura-t-il compensation en or si on loot le Defender
en possédant déjà l'Object 252U? - est-ce que les Belges seront
seulement privés d'acheter des box mais aussi d'en recevoir en
cadeau?
panzerlemaire, on 10 December 2018 - 04:12 PM, said: Facile ? Si quelqu'un a une solution, je suis
preneur !
ExoticFireCorps, on 10 December 2018 - 04:12 PM, said: Le style de BC en général me fait plutôt penser à un hommage
aux différents régiments de soldats africain qui ont servis pour la
France au court de son histoire. Notamment les régiments de spahis
( aujourd'hui ils appartiennent à l'arme blindée-cavalerie ) .
Après le fait qu'ils parlent de cuirasse, heaume et d'épée
dans la description ça me fait plus penser aux
croisades 
Ugly_Pony, on 10 December 2018 - 04:14 PM, said: je veux une explication pour quoi on peu pas en avoir en Belgique
bordel
Link on message: #16431393
Demerdenzizich, on 10 December 2018 - 03:53 PM, said: Je me faisais déjà insulter de "muslim pig" quand un joueur (pour
qui je soupçonne que papa et tonton sont une seule et unique
personne) reconnaissait le drapeau français mais là le camo du
BatChat c'est la porte ouverte aux insultes du même genre.
Et sinon ce serait bien d'avoir une réponse officielle à ces 2
questions: - y aura-t-il compensation en or si on loot le Defender
en possédant déjà l'Object 252U? - est-ce que les Belges seront
seulement privés d'acheter des box mais aussi d'en recevoir en
cadeau?Actinid: Je me renseigne pour le Defender // Object 252U. Nos
amis Belges ayant été sages cette année ils auront droit à des
cadeaux.
panzerlemaire, on 10 December 2018 - 04:12 PM, said: Facile ? Si quelqu'un a une solution, je suis
preneur ! Actinid: Il y a une page ici(En anglais uniquement la traduction est en
cours). Pour résumé, vous pouvez vous les faire offrir en
cadeau.
ExoticFireCorps, on 10 December 2018 - 04:12 PM, said: Le style de BC en général me fait plutôt penser à un hommage
aux différents régiments de soldats africain qui ont servis pour la
France au court de son histoire. Notamment les régiments de spahis
( aujourd'hui ils appartiennent à l'arme blindée-cavalerie ) .
Après le fait qu'ils parlent de cuirasse, heaume et d'épée
dans la description ça me fait plus penser aux
croisades Actinid: Je l'ai compris comme ça pour ma part. Je pense que c'est
l'idée qui est derrière.
Ugly_Pony, on 10 December 2018 - 04:14 PM, said: je veux une explication pour quoi on peu pas en avoir en Belgique
bordel Actinid: Vous n'avez pas gagné la coupe du monde de football.
Blague à part,il ne s'agit pas d'une décision de notre part, mais
de contraintes légales. Bonne journée et n'hésitez pas à
poster vos retours constructifs.
vuque
Noel Baba x Krampus: Kuzey Kutbu Savaşı
10.12.2018 19:18:50
Subject: Noel Baba x Krampus: Kuzey Kutbu Savaşı
Link on message: #16431387
Spartiat777, on 10 December 2018 - 06:17 PM, said: sizde yoqsa bunun verisi biz n'edelim?
Link on message: #16431387
Spartiat777, on 10 December 2018 - 06:17 PM, said: sizde yoqsa bunun verisi biz n'edelim?vuque: Var tabii ki ama burada sizlerin hangi tarafı
tuttuğunuzu görmek de önemli!
Sael_
Al Supertest: Versione di prova di una nuova mappa!
10.12.2018 19:18:17
Subject: Al Supertest: Versione di prova di una nuova mappa!
Link on message: #16431385
Link on message: #16431385
Sael_: Oggi cominciamo il test di un nuovo prototipo di mappa. Non siamo
sicuri se la introdurremo oppure no: la nostra intenzione
principale è di provare nuove configurazioni per gli oggetti
all'interno del gioco e raccogliere dati per gli sviluppi di
ulteriori mappe in generale. Questa località di prova presenta un
gruppo di oggetti inusuali e opzioni tattiche di assalto. E' un
prototipo rudimentale che verrà migliorato in base ai risultati del
test. Al momento non ha nessuna ambientazione storica o geografica.
Il paesaggio è misto, una combinazione di blocchi cittadini con uno
spazio relativamente aperto sul lato sinistro dove il territorio
irregolare può essere sfruttato come copertura. 1) I siti di difesa aerea sul bordo ovest della
mappa sono caponiere dalla forma arrotondata che offrono riparo dal
fuoco nemico mentre si attacca lo spazio aperto. I veicoli pesanti
possono entrarvi solo usando la strada, mentre veicoli più
manovrabili potranno arrivarci attraverso le colline (con una certa
abilità di guida). C'è una grossa collinetta artificiale al centro
di questa zona con il bunker di comando. Tale collinetta è coperta
di alberi ed è una zona chiave all'avanzata verso i cespugli. Da
qui, si può far fuoco verso le posizioni dei cacciacarri nella zona
2 e/o rinforzare l'attacco, avanzando verso le caponiere più
distanti. 2) Le colline vicino alle basi sono utili per i
cacciacarri ed i cecchini in generale. Seduti qui, si potrà
difendere la base dagli attacchi in arrivo dai cespugli. Le colline
sono anche l'ultima linea di difesa contro i nemici in arrivo dalla
città. 3) Al centro, la stazione ferroviaria e la base militare
offrono posizioni di copertura sparpagliate che tuttavia non
saranno sufficienti a proteggervi dal fuoco diretto, o
dell'artiglieria nemica. Potrete comunque farne uso per avanzare
attraverso la zona, spostarvi sull'altro lato o duellare con
qualche nemico. Anche se la stazione offre un po' di protezione,
non vi si può entrare. 4) I blocchi cittadini oltre il fiume ad est
sono la zona perfetta per i carri pesanti. I ponti sono coperti dal
fuoco incrociato proveniente dal centro della mappa - far fuoco
sulla piazza dalle postazioni presso la stazione ferroviaria al
momento giusto vi eviterà di ricevere fuoco nemico a cui non
potreste rispondere. L'argine del fiume è ricurvo ed offre un po'
di copertura, ma resta un posto pericoloso. I punti chiave per i
pesanti sono i solchi tra le collinette e i passaggi che vi
conducono; di questi ultimi ce ne sono due, di cui uno ha blocchi
di cemento che permettono di giocare a scafo nascosto. Questa
posizione può comunque essere minacciata dai cacciacarri nascosti
nei cespugli dentro i quadrilateri. L'altro passaggio, quello senza
i blocchi di cemento, è destinato ai carri da side-scraping.
A seconda dei risultati, decideremo cosa accadrà a questo
prototipo di mappa. Continuate a seguirci e buona fortuna in
battaglia!
1) I siti di difesa aerea sul bordo ovest della
mappa sono caponiere dalla forma arrotondata che offrono riparo dal
fuoco nemico mentre si attacca lo spazio aperto. I veicoli pesanti
possono entrarvi solo usando la strada, mentre veicoli più
manovrabili potranno arrivarci attraverso le colline (con una certa
abilità di guida). C'è una grossa collinetta artificiale al centro
di questa zona con il bunker di comando. Tale collinetta è coperta
di alberi ed è una zona chiave all'avanzata verso i cespugli. Da
qui, si può far fuoco verso le posizioni dei cacciacarri nella zona
2 e/o rinforzare l'attacco, avanzando verso le caponiere più
distanti. 2) Le colline vicino alle basi sono utili per i
cacciacarri ed i cecchini in generale. Seduti qui, si potrà
difendere la base dagli attacchi in arrivo dai cespugli. Le colline
sono anche l'ultima linea di difesa contro i nemici in arrivo dalla
città. 3) Al centro, la stazione ferroviaria e la base militare
offrono posizioni di copertura sparpagliate che tuttavia non
saranno sufficienti a proteggervi dal fuoco diretto, o
dell'artiglieria nemica. Potrete comunque farne uso per avanzare
attraverso la zona, spostarvi sull'altro lato o duellare con
qualche nemico. Anche se la stazione offre un po' di protezione,
non vi si può entrare. 4) I blocchi cittadini oltre il fiume ad est
sono la zona perfetta per i carri pesanti. I ponti sono coperti dal
fuoco incrociato proveniente dal centro della mappa - far fuoco
sulla piazza dalle postazioni presso la stazione ferroviaria al
momento giusto vi eviterà di ricevere fuoco nemico a cui non
potreste rispondere. L'argine del fiume è ricurvo ed offre un po'
di copertura, ma resta un posto pericoloso. I punti chiave per i
pesanti sono i solchi tra le collinette e i passaggi che vi
conducono; di questi ultimi ce ne sono due, di cui uno ha blocchi
di cemento che permettono di giocare a scafo nascosto. Questa
posizione può comunque essere minacciata dai cacciacarri nascosti
nei cespugli dentro i quadrilateri. L'altro passaggio, quello senza
i blocchi di cemento, è destinato ai carri da side-scraping.
A seconda dei risultati, decideremo cosa accadrà a questo
prototipo di mappa. Continuate a seguirci e buona fortuna in
battaglia! vuque
Şenlik Takvimi: 4. Gün
10.12.2018 19:15:38
Subject: Şenlik Takvimi: 4. Gün
Link on message: #16431366
ATHELON_, on 04 December 2018 - 09:51 AM, said: Moderatörlerin bizim bu dönüşlerimizi toplayıp yönetime
ilettiklerini düşünüyorum.
Link on message: #16431366
ATHELON_, on 04 December 2018 - 09:51 AM, said: Moderatörlerin bizim bu dönüşlerimizi toplayıp yönetime
ilettiklerini düşünüyorum. vuque: İletiyoruz!
eekeeboo
A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
10.12.2018 19:10:23
Subject: A Helping Hand for Holiday Ops
Link on message: #16431340
WaffleTiger, on 10 December 2018 - 10:12 AM, said: HHaha, I love the soundjob on this one. The speaker talked too fast
during recording and the editor slowed him down. He sounds DRUNK!
Q555, on 10 December 2018 - 10:16 AM, said: This game will die for this kind of offer ..... bravo WG great job
.... shame on you
Hokum15, on 10 December 2018 - 10:22 AM, said: NO NO NO. Don't swamp tier 5 with ruddy leFH18B2, the tank is
horribly unbalanced in tier 5, it is a horrible tank for new
players to play against.
YES YES YES. 3D styles for tier tens. MORE OF THIS! They look awesome (though lose the minigun on the T57).
andrinkls, on 10 December 2018 - 10:23 AM, said: *Grabs popcorn*
DiSaBor, on 10 December 2018 - 10:26 AM, said: They are actually putting bullshits like Defender/LeFe/E-25 on
sale, more and more and more often. What they do at WG shows that
they don't care about WoT in long terms. They don't want to make
this game better. They only want to milk people like us cuz PEOPLE
ARE BUYING these bull shits, as I did yesterday (130PM at -80%)
Stop being silly, quit the game and hopefully WG will learn one
day. If they don't, quitting a dying game which is becoming worse
and worse, cannot be a bad decision. (I am saying this,
mainly to myself) Some people want to see the world burn, but
WG wants their game to die.
markthekiller, on 10 December 2018 - 10:27 AM, said: So many less than good thing here WG. You are selling blatantly
overpowered flat out broken tanks. But you aren't atually selling
the tanks, you are selling the chance to win one. I love how
ompanies keep promoting gambling as if it isn't exactly that.
Atleast you have some cosmetic items. You are still gambling
with them but atleast they aren't brokenly op tanks.
HugSeal, on 10 December 2018 - 10:28 AM, said: Cobra6, i always said this. The MM is not broken, according to
eekeeboo satetments on facebook. And he is right. Its not broken
for them. Case1. You are in tier 8, get to play 80% in tier 10
games. So you shoot gold ammo, which u buy with credits. So, you
need premium time not to get into minus. Wg 1, you 0. Case 2. You
are tier 6 noob. See defender, chrysler or other op premium tanks
doing lol dmg and you bouncing. So you NEED to buy one of those.
But hey, according to MM template you will get 80% in tier 10
games. So you shoot gold ammo, buy premium time. Wg 3, you 0. Get
it? Until whole EU server will noy boicot wg buy not buying
anything for real cash a month as a warning, they will never ever
give a flying fly about what ppl say!! Oh, im free from this game,
as i am banned
HeartAttacks, on 10 December 2018 - 10:29 AM, said: I was a bit hyped about thiis loot boxes in the beggining - I
admit! Now that I saw the actual offer, I went on the other
game site and bought a full game without any itention to spend a
single cent on WOT this year, at last. So hugely dissopointed!
The pivotal point of their offer, that was originaly designed around the idea of festive ambiance - giving gifts to other players (which I truly and wholehearthetdly enjoy!) decorating tree for the surge in exp, credits and other stuff, is now gambling and investing huge money to get hold of OP tanks! Can you imagine that 2 out 4 tanks are Defender and E25!?!?! In a single take - the whole Christmas event is a mascarade of an expensive gambling event with Defender as a main prize! Sad... really sad.. For those who wish to know which other game I bought - it is a flight sim
MajorTom75, on 10 December 2018 - 10:36 AM, said:
Link on message: #16431340
WaffleTiger, on 10 December 2018 - 10:12 AM, said: HHaha, I love the soundjob on this one. The speaker talked too fast
during recording and the editor slowed him down. He sounds DRUNK!
eekeeboo: The person doing the voiceover is just super into
Christmas celebration!
Q555, on 10 December 2018 - 10:16 AM, said: This game will die for this kind of offer ..... bravo WG great job
.... shame on you eekeeboo: At this stage, based on comments like this, World of Tanks is a
phoenix and keeps being reborn.
Hokum15, on 10 December 2018 - 10:22 AM, said: NO NO NO. Don't swamp tier 5 with ruddy leFH18B2, the tank is
horribly unbalanced in tier 5, it is a horrible tank for new
players to play against.YES YES YES. 3D styles for tier tens. MORE OF THIS! They look awesome (though lose the minigun on the T57).
eekeeboo: Thanks for the feedback, I can see the huge interest
in the new styles!
andrinkls, on 10 December 2018 - 10:23 AM, said: *Grabs popcorn*eekeeboo: As long as it's Christmas pudding flavoured!
DiSaBor, on 10 December 2018 - 10:26 AM, said: They are actually putting bullshits like Defender/LeFe/E-25 on
sale, more and more and more often. What they do at WG shows that
they don't care about WoT in long terms. They don't want to make
this game better. They only want to milk people like us cuz PEOPLE
ARE BUYING these bull shits, as I did yesterday (130PM at -80%)
Stop being silly, quit the game and hopefully WG will learn one
day. If they don't, quitting a dying game which is becoming worse
and worse, cannot be a bad decision. (I am saying this,
mainly to myself) Some people want to see the world burn, but
WG wants their game to die.eekeeboo: I already replied to concerns like these in a previous post I can
link to you if you're interested. We care about the game and want
it to live for as long as possible.
markthekiller, on 10 December 2018 - 10:27 AM, said: So many less than good thing here WG. You are selling blatantly
overpowered flat out broken tanks. But you aren't atually selling
the tanks, you are selling the chance to win one. I love how
ompanies keep promoting gambling as if it isn't exactly that.
Atleast you have some cosmetic items. You are still gambling
with them but atleast they aren't brokenly op tanks.eekeeboo: I want to just highlight that the chance to earn tanks is in
bonus to the other things you can earn from the boxes, if there was
no chance would you still object?
HugSeal, on 10 December 2018 - 10:28 AM, said: Cobra6, i always said this. The MM is not broken, according to
eekeeboo satetments on facebook. And he is right. Its not broken
for them. Case1. You are in tier 8, get to play 80% in tier 10
games. So you shoot gold ammo, which u buy with credits. So, you
need premium time not to get into minus. Wg 1, you 0. Case 2. You
are tier 6 noob. See defender, chrysler or other op premium tanks
doing lol dmg and you bouncing. So you NEED to buy one of those.
But hey, according to MM template you will get 80% in tier 10
games. So you shoot gold ammo, buy premium time. Wg 3, you 0. Get
it? Until whole EU server will noy boicot wg buy not buying
anything for real cash a month as a warning, they will never ever
give a flying fly about what ppl say!! Oh, im free from this game,
as i am banned eekeeboo: You will also remember what was discussed, you said it's broken
because it doesn't work. The part is that the MM works as it was
intended to, is this a good thing? If it was there wouldn't be a
re-work already in progress. Providing all the information is key
when you claim a person has said something who will then read your
post.
HeartAttacks, on 10 December 2018 - 10:29 AM, said: I was a bit hyped about thiis loot boxes in the beggining - I
admit! Now that I saw the actual offer, I went on the other
game site and bought a full game without any itention to spend a
single cent on WOT this year, at last. So hugely dissopointed!The pivotal point of their offer, that was originaly designed around the idea of festive ambiance - giving gifts to other players (which I truly and wholehearthetdly enjoy!) decorating tree for the surge in exp, credits and other stuff, is now gambling and investing huge money to get hold of OP tanks! Can you imagine that 2 out 4 tanks are Defender and E25!?!?! In a single take - the whole Christmas event is a mascarade of an expensive gambling event with Defender as a main prize! Sad... really sad.. For those who wish to know which other game I bought - it is a flight sim
eekeeboo: Good luck with your games on World of Warplanes!
MajorTom75, on 10 December 2018 - 10:36 AM, said: eekeeboo:
vuque
Noel Baba x Krampus: Kuzey Kutbu Savaşı
10.12.2018 19:09:36
Subject: Noel Baba x Krampus: Kuzey Kutbu Savaşı
Link on message: #16431337
Link on message: #16431337
vuque: Oyları kime veriyoruz arkadaşlar? Kazanan tarafta olmak iyi olur,
renginizi belli edin ki hangi taraf fazlaysa ona oy vereyim!
eekeeboo
WoT Suggestions Thread
10.12.2018 18:58:58
Subject: WoT Suggestions Thread
Link on message: #16431285
Link on message: #16431285
eekeeboo: Tankers, Please stay constructive and on-topic. This
is important for not only avoiding moderation but preventing the
thread from becoming a toxic zone in need of locking.
Thank-you.
Falathi
Jeśli nie ma paczek świątecznych, to jesteśmy w Belgii
10.12.2018 18:57:32
Subject: Jeśli nie ma paczek świątecznych, to jesteśmy w Belgii
Link on message: #16431280
Link on message: #16431280
Falathi: Uwaga, ogłoszenie duszpasterskie: nasze paczki
świąteczne nie są dostępne dla graczy z Belgii, lub osób, które
mają ustawioną Belgię jako kraj pobytu, z którego grają.
Bardzo proszę o wzięcie tego pod uwagę, w szczególności jeśli ktoś jest z Belgii a chciałby dokonać zakupu.
Bardzo proszę o wzięcie tego pod uwagę, w szczególności jeśli ktoś jest z Belgii a chciałby dokonać zakupu.
eekeeboo
Reporting for Duty
10.12.2018 18:57:13
Subject: Reporting for Duty
Link on message: #16431277
Axelfoley666, on 09 December 2018 - 01:54 PM, said: Putting Arty and Gouda in the same grouping is most
offensive, take that back Sir!!!!
Link on message: #16431277
Axelfoley666, on 09 December 2018 - 01:54 PM, said: Putting Arty and Gouda in the same grouping is most
offensive, take that back Sir!!!!eekeeboo: I challenge you to a duel!
eekeeboo
Get Ready for Holiday Ops 2019
10.12.2018 18:53:19
Subject: Get Ready for Holiday Ops 2019
Link on message: #16431264
Joggaman, on 09 December 2018 - 01:06 AM, said: Looking forward to this event! This way I can celebrate Christmas
without leaving my computer!. Win win!
Link on message: #16431264
Joggaman, on 09 December 2018 - 01:06 AM, said: Looking forward to this event! This way I can celebrate Christmas
without leaving my computer!. Win win!eekeeboo: Wait.... there are other ways to celebrate?!
eekeeboo
Updated Map Pool for Strongholds
10.12.2018 18:51:49
Subject: Updated Map Pool for Strongholds
Link on message: #16431258
Link on message: #16431258
eekeeboo: Thanks for the feedback. I can ask the questions, but
I don't know when I'll get the answers!
Реклама | Adv