Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
LiannaSilverwind
Limit of Clan War battle?
arrow
13.11.2010 01:17:04
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Limit of Clan War battle?
Link on message: #225347

LiannaSilverwind: Hardcore clan will always use all possibilities to win the game.
So if it's possible to have hundreds of people in clan, they will do it. If it is not possible, they will make sub-clan divisions, that will cooperate together and rule the map together.
If Tier 10 tanks are needed, they will cooperate together to get them ASAP. If points are limited, they will make ideal teams and cooperate together to get them ASAP.
No limits:
Hardcore people should have several Tier 9-10 tanks in garage.
Usual teams will have Tier 10 heavies, Tier 8-9 TDs, Tier 8 Mediums, few lights, Tier 5-6 SPGs (Tiers will be increased in time)
Point limits:
Hardcore people should have several Tier 8 tanks in garage.
Usual teams will have Tier 8 heavies, Tier 8 TDs, Tier 8 Mediums, few lights, Tier 5-6 SPGs (Tiers will be increased in time)
So what is the real difference? Casual player won't be able to join hardcore clan for very long time, before he gets his vehicles to "must-to-have" level, be it 8 or 10. Is point behind "point limits" ability of normal player to join Clan Wars sooner than with "no limits"? Yes, Tier 10 takes much longer to gain than Tier 8, but if we care about more "normal" players, what about limiting Tiers to, say, tier 6, like Junior league?
I do not want to cause trouble, I'm just trying to find deep logics behind "We need points limit". Hardcore clan will make subdivisions if limited and it will have perfectly cooperating teams for every battle in any case. Hardcore clan is not here for you to have fun, it's here to farm every other player and Win The Game ™.
In any case I'm very curious about Clan Wars and hope we'd be able to test them too.


Tanitha
Does what you do in the Closed Beta carry on into the full game?
arrow
12.11.2010 23:32:04
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Does what you do in the Closed Beta carry on into the full game?
Link on message: #225178

View PostWaRRi0R_FarseeR, on 24 September 2010 - 09:56 PM, said: Are you guys sure beta testers are going to get a free tank?

Tanitha: There's nothing confirmed at this stage, no. Release is still a while away.


Tanitha
Why was auto-aim (Lead computation) taken out in yesterdays patch?
arrow
12.11.2010 23:23:48
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Why was auto-aim (Lead computation) taken out in yesterdays patch?
Link on message: #225165

View PostThaTrip, on 12 November 2010 - 10:02 PM, said: No offense there are many topics of Auto-Aim already. Only different names, but they all mean the same. Can you next time post in there.
For auto-aim being changed. It takes more skills now to shoot at a tank. So work on that. And you love it.
Here are the topics that have been already created about discussing about Auto-Aim.
New aiming system, good or bad?
They Need to fix Auto-Aim quickly

Tanitha: Correct, +1'ed the neg rep you had.
In future though if you press report, or pm me, I'll get to it quicker : )
I'll merge these three threads.


Tanitha
EXP nerf
arrow
12.11.2010 22:52:00
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\EXP nerf
Link on message: #225107

View PostHomer_J, on 12 November 2010 - 10:20 PM, said: So do you think it could be a bug.... or some people are having a hard time adjusting to the changes?
Played some more today, don't see any difference to before the patch.

Tanitha: A few things that will effect the exp.
1. 20% shell speed reduction, and a apparent alteration in the auto aim.
I usually rely pretty heavily on auto aim. My excuse is I'm from Australia and I'm normally on about 350+ ping. So when I first logged in, I was missing a lot!. Playing the dog fighting tanks wasn't much different, but playing the long range snipers and trying to auto aim snipe moving tanks that are 400m away. yeah big difference.
2. New usa tanks has effected the team balance, I'm finding a lot more lower tanks (usa) in the games and shooting tanks lower than your tier pays less exp.
Please mention what tanks you are in, maybe add some screenshots too to show what tiers you were up against.. etc..
Exp is based on the tanks you are shooting, And atm there is lots of low tier USA tanks in the game. Id guess this is the problem.


Tanitha
Achievement Medals?
arrow
12.11.2010 21:58:09
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Achievement Medals?
Link on message: #224998

View PostThaTrip, on 12 November 2010 - 09:53 PM, said: Little earlier I was in a battle. I was being owned hard, by 6 tanks shooting me for at least 1min+. I got hit more then 20 times at least. And I didn't get the Steel Wall medal.
Yesterday a friend of mine in his IS-3 also was complaining about he didn't get a medal for sniper. Is it changed or is it bugged for him and me?

Tanitha: Its changed.
1. Steel wall now needs you to survive and live.
2. Sniper now needs you to shoot more than 10times, and hit 85% of the time.
So 9/10 for a example.


LiannaSilverwind
Russian community WoT!!!
arrow
12.11.2010 21:40:23
 
Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Russian community WoT!!!
Link on message: #224966

View PostunReaL, on 12 November 2010 - 06:56 PM, said: Почему у немцев, поляков и сербов отдельные подразделы, а у нас всё в категории "Off-Topic Discussion". Негодую! :)

LiannaSilverwind: Ответ: потому что поляки могут говорить в чате по-польски, немцы - по-немецки, а попробуй ты поговорить по-русски, воплеж до небес.


LiannaSilverwind
US OPEN Championship World of Tanks - discussion
arrow
12.11.2010 21:36:26
 
Subject: Contests & Competitions\Championships & Competitions\Championships Archive\WOT US Open\US OPEN Championship World of Tanks - discussion
Link on message: #224957

View Posted_anger, on 12 November 2010 - 05:13 PM, said: im sure you can sign up if you want to play at 3am, just like americans were free to play in the last championship over several weekdays mid-afternoon.

LiannaSilverwind: I see certain difference between mid-afternoon and deep night. :Smile-hiding:


Tanitha
when us European will be able to play us?
arrow
12.11.2010 20:35:15
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\when us European will be able to play us?
Link on message: #224829

Tanitha: Problems solved. Moving thread then..


Tanitha
Why was auto-aim (Lead computation) taken out in yesterdays patch?
arrow
12.11.2010 20:20:03
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Why was auto-aim (Lead computation) taken out in yesterdays patch?
Link on message: #224789

View PostPhazuka, on 12 November 2010 - 08:00 PM, said: ETA: Should I post this under Gameplay? Please reply with intelligent responses, not anonymous negative reputation dings.

Tanitha: All posts on the closed beta should be in the closed beta section, this was not..
I'll move it.


Tanitha
aim
arrow
12.11.2010 18:48:31
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\aim
Link on message: #224577

Tanitha: Pointless rage thread that is barely understandable and containing too much bad language.
No Ro issued at this time. but locking..


Tanitha
AA clan recruiting
arrow
12.11.2010 16:19:26
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\AA clan recruiting
Link on message: #224202

Tanitha: Closing this duplicate recruiting post as requested.
Have fun and good luck with your clan.


LiannaSilverwind
Post Patch Arty 6.1.5
arrow
12.11.2010 11:44:26
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Post Patch Arty 6.1.5
Link on message: #223662

LiannaSilverwind: My feelings after 6 hours of gameplay on normal tanks and S-51.
1) 10% accuracy nerf is definitely present, making SPG fire more random than before. If Random Gods did not like you before, you would only scratch other vehicles with splash. If they decided to like you, you would oneshot everything 5 times in a row. Now randomness is increased.
2) Due to lower shell velocity it's harder to hit properly driven targets at long range. Fortunately most people did not drive properly before... will they now?
3) Counterbattery is much harder now due to points 1+2. Hummels and S-51s are now completely safe against non-SPG platoons trying to counterbattery them unless being completely unlucky. SU-14 chances to survive increased a lot.
4) US SPG Tier 2 is so perfectly armoured that most tanks ding their shots off it, having very nice speed it's also able to work as... Scout.
5) As a tank driver I was destroyed by enemy SPGs only once, because I made stupid mistake. Situation did not change here.
My conclusions based on very short period of time after the patch:
1) SPG weapon are now more random than before which is not good. Personally I'd rather see damage decrease (if nerf is needed) than accuracy decrease.
2) People who will not learn how to cover or how to drive properly will still ask for more SPG nerfs because they will be destroyed quickly. Before patch my IS-7 nor my ISU-152 were ever destroyed by SPGs, I doubt situation will be harder for them now.
3) Forget about counterbattering good SPG drivers. Now it's upon you, dear tankist, to deal with enemy artillery. <_<


Tanitha
EXP nerf
arrow
12.11.2010 02:06:43
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\EXP nerf
Link on message: #222733

View PostAthrin, on 12 November 2010 - 02:00 AM, said: Why was our EXP gain nerfed?????

Tanitha: I haven't noticed much difference really.
If anything i was wondering if it went up.
Posted Image
45k credits on a vk4502 is a bit more than usual. (And no it wasn't a double exp game)


LiannaSilverwind
Half fps with new patch.
arrow
12.11.2010 01:13:58
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Half fps with new patch.
Link on message: #222638

View PostEnder_Ward, on 12 November 2010 - 01:06 AM, said: I've got a GTX 460 (768mb version) and I too can report constant stuttering and greatly reduced FPS. I've turned most settings to low, only a very few are on medium and nothing on high. Yet I am getting much, much worse FPS than I did before the patch on higher graphics settings.
It's gotten so bad that I've had dips to below 10fps. That never happened before the patch.
Latest drivers.
4GB RAM.
Core 2 Duo E6700 CPU.

LiannaSilverwind: My computer is: i7 QuadCore 2.8 Ghz, 4 GB RAM, GTX 460
Problem: FPS jump from 120 to 5 and then rise up to 120 during 1-2 seconds very often, ingame graphics settings are Moderate to Low, which is insane when taking into consideration hardware we use.


Tanitha
Auto aim even worse now !
arrow
11.11.2010 19:29:33
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Auto aim even worse now !
Link on message: #221817

Tanitha: I agree auto aim is worse now. But its the same for everyone, So, There's no problem. Its just incentive to use manual aim more which isn't a bad thing.


LiannaSilverwind
Welcome to Russian WoT Community
arrow
11.11.2010 17:44:29
 
Subject: International Forums\BY, RU, UA Community\Welcome to Russian WoT Community
Link on message: #221555

View PostA_Rotten_Egg, on 11 November 2010 - 05:27 AM, said: I could never have imagined it just 25 years ago.
:Smile_honoring: to my former "enemies"!

LiannaSilverwind: While attending school I was being prepared to fight off American invaders, I remember these times...
Salute to you as well! :Smile_honoring:
I just hope that after Containment, Duck and Cover and Evil Empire, and after War against Terror, there once will be time, where all people of all nations will be friends and brothers.


Tanitha
0.6.1.5 Performance sucks?
arrow
11.11.2010 16:50:20
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\0.6.1.5 Performance sucks?
Link on message: #221343

View PostJuanx, on 11 November 2010 - 04:41 PM, said: Lemme guess, ATI user?
My game runs fine, try modding the extra gfx setting we have now(same as we had modding the custom file before).

Tanitha: Nah i have a older nvidia. If you have a good graphics card you can handle the new advanced graphics settings set to high nps.
If you have a old card that struggles a bit, then default higher settings is too much for the card.


Tanitha
0.6.1.5 Performance sucks?
arrow
11.11.2010 16:41:15
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\0.6.1.5 Performance sucks?
Link on message: #221307

Tanitha: I couldn't play very well either, but the graphics in game have new advanced settings that defaulted to being pretty high, So I turned mine back down to lower.
Going to try again now.
*edit the altered settings and a comp reset gave me a very smooth game compared to usual.


Tanitha
0.6.1.5 Balance
arrow
11.11.2010 16:13:34
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\0.6.1.5 Balance
Link on message: #221217

Tanitha: Give it a chance, the balancing is probably optimized for 5000+ players at the moment, and there might only be 1000? online at the moment.
See how things are when everyone is online. (how many are online at the moment?)


Tanitha
How long did it take to receive a Key Code?
arrow
11.11.2010 15:54:17
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\How long did it take to receive a Key Code?
Link on message: #221159

Tanitha: The key thread is here. I keep it up to date.
http://forum.worldof...available-here/
So locking this thread.


Tanitha
Soft Wipe ?
arrow
11.11.2010 15:49:37
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Soft Wipe ?
Link on message: #221147

View PosttheMuhaha, on 11 November 2010 - 03:39 PM, said: nuf said, close topic plz mod

Tanitha: Only because you insisted.
:Smile_honoring:
And yes hardwipe on release. : )
Softwipe might or might not happen before release, none have been confirmed yet.


Tanitha
How much Gold price is gonna be similar to Russia ?
arrow
11.11.2010 15:45:52
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Questions\How much Gold price is gonna be similar to Russia ?
Link on message: #221134

View PostHornet331, on 11 November 2010 - 03:29 PM, said: I doubt prices will be the same, since you have different purchasing power in russia then in western europe and the USA.
Guess it will be something like 1€~100 Gold.

Tanitha: They have previously said it will be "about" the same as the Russian server. Which is $1 for 250 gold.
100 gold is way off the mark.


Tanitha
[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
arrow
11.11.2010 15:41:23
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
Link on message: #221126

View PostNightShift, on 11 November 2010 - 03:13 PM, said: Same here
11/10/2010 06:07:02 connecting to http download server...
11/10/2010 06:07:23 ERROR: http request error: verb="POST" url="http://downloads.worldoftanks.com/patches/auto/wot_61.56435_launcher.patch" error="12002" status_code="200"
11/10/2010 06:07:27 stop update process...
11/10/2010 06:07:27 Stop.

Tanitha: How big is that .patch file? It worked for me ok.
It was probably just the bug with the launcher/server, which has been fixed now.


Tanitha
Using the torrent file
arrow
11.11.2010 15:09:52
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Using the torrent file
Link on message: #220954

View PostMarkLT, on 11 November 2010 - 08:30 AM, said: The direct download has never taken very long for me. I prefer direct DL over torrent cause there is nothing for me to screw up then wonder why its not working :Smile-hiding: . Guess I will re download bit torrent /sigh

Tanitha: DL links are up but very slow atm.
http://game.worldoftanks.com/update
=
http://downloads.worldoftanks.com/patches/auto/WoT_beta_0.6.1.5.58710_eng_setup.exe http://downloads.worldoftanks.com/patches/auto/WoT_beta_0.6.1.5.58710_eng_patch.exe.torrent
Downloading the full client from the WOT servers will be difficult and slow though (overloaded), the torrent will be the quicker way if possible for you.


Tanitha
[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
arrow
11.11.2010 14:59:43
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
Link on message: #220898

View Postsoon88, on 11 November 2010 - 02:58 PM, said: Yes Rhovan, thanks for the link but thats a torrent link I'm afraid. I'm talking about the direct downloads. Admins also please take note that your link for FULL 0.6.1.5 Client (1.6gb link) is also a link to the old patch.

Tanitha: As i said above, Ive already had it fixed, So refresh/reload your webpage, or clear your cache if you cant display the updated webpage.
Regards
http://game.worldoftanks.com/update
=
http://downloads.worldoftanks.com/patches/auto/WoT_beta_0.6.1.5.58710_eng_setup.exe http://downloads.worldoftanks.com/patches/auto/WoT_beta_0.6.1.5.58710_eng_patch.exe.torrent
Downloading the full client from the WOT servers will be difficult and slow though (overloaded), the torrent will be the quicker way if possible for you.


Tanitha
[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
arrow
11.11.2010 14:57:00
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
Link on message: #220873

Tanitha: Yep thanks, I got them to fix the typos already. The new links are up now.
Merging similar threads..


Tanitha
[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
arrow
11.11.2010 14:48:34
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\[PATCH] Upgrade from 0.5.5.1 to 0.6.1.5 Direct Download Error
Link on message: #220809

View Postbismark, on 11 November 2010 - 02:40 PM, said: :angry: :angry: what's going on with that? :angry: :angry:
I try to download new patch and when i click on downloads that appears to me... i want to know if that happens to everybody or only to me, and if it's only to me, why? i only want to take a new US tank... :Smile-playing: :Smile-playing:

Tanitha: Im on it.. Shouldn't be long before its fixed. Sorry looks like some typos on the main website when they put up some new links.
*edit.. website links are fixed now. Thanks overlord for getting it done quickly.
New direct link and torrrent are now up..
http://game.worldoftanks.com/update
They don't load very well at the moment though. You might have to wait for maintenance to finish before the links work properly again.
And since the website is slow, you would probably be a lot better downloading the torrent file than the direct link


LiannaSilverwind
Limit of Clan War battle?
arrow
11.11.2010 14:22:44
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Limit of Clan War battle?
Link on message: #220702

View Posthalfik, on 11 November 2010 - 01:01 PM, said: yea its great idea - pay to play in clan wars or stay in random.
if devs are so sure that no limit is what players want - pls make a poll and we will see. i can make a bet that 80% + of players will vote for limited clan wars.

LiannaSilverwind: F2P games are based on such a model.
There are P2P games, where everyone is equal, because everyone pays. There are F2P games, where people who pay gain certain advantages, because they are those who allow project to continue, to evolve and those who do not pay to play for free. In WoT advantages of being premium player are definitely not as high as in other F2P projects.
For example:
1) You can get IS-7/Maus without premium, it will just take 3 times longer (not indefinitely longer and you can get top tanks unlike in other projects where you cannot get top Equip without paying). Are you in a hurry? If no, why do you want to pay?
2) You can get premium tanks, that are not really efficient and are weaker than their normal counterparts for their level. Yes, you can transfer Free XP off them (with gold, ie. you buy tank for real money, you spend real money for XP transfer) or farm credits with them, whilst being weaker.
3) You can get premium shells, that give you very slight advantage, whilst not being extremely cheap. That is the only real advantage premium players get IMHO.
Project needs its funding. If you want to fight for equality of non-paying players and paying players, I'm afraid it won't work well for F2P games. F2P games allow non-paying players to play for absolutely free, that's a great thing. WoT even allows them to get best equipment and become real challenge for paying players unlike most other F2P games where Pay = Win, Not Pay = Enjoy Low Levels and never see other content.
Considering Clan Wars, I'm honestly afraid we, on EU-US servers, are very far from them, so we will see how they do evolve. For now I agree with you that clans with 90 people with top tanks definitely have higher chance than clan of 20 people with tier 5 vehicles.
On the other side - what is Champion's League about? T8 mediums, T8 heavies, T8 TDs, T5-6 SPGs. Absolute will be about T8 mediums (T9 when released), T9-10 heavies, T8-9 TDs, T5-6 SPGs. Are they really that different if we take to account that very soon playing clans will have everything? You say we should be afraid of IS-7/Maus/few Meds/few Scouts/SPGs battles only, but in Champions we have IS-3/KT battles/few Meds/few Scouts/SPGs only as well.
Russian server shows that teams without Lights/Meds, only based on TT10/SPGs, lose to those more balanced ones.
Considering polls in General, they usually represent response of vocal minorities, rarely numbering more than tenth of real players. Most players do not even read forums. Involuntary ingame poll would be much more interesting ofc.


Tanitha
Full Wipe At Relaese
arrow
11.11.2010 13:46:54
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Full Wipe At Relaese
Link on message: #220586

View PostMrFumbles, on 11 November 2010 - 01:20 PM, said: I imagine every time a this topic pops up some poor mod is pooping a vein.
Please stop hurting our poor moderators.
They have their hands full with cleaning hamster cages & the general chat.

Tanitha: Lol nah, tis cool, discussion's fine as long as the abuse keeps out of it.
As for beta's. Ive been in many. They all do it differently.
And to answer some of the previous comments
Yes, I have had to pay for a few beta's. Some were.. You had to be a paid member of a gaming website to get the free beta key.
Some were, you had to buy another one of their older games to be able to beta their new one. Etc..
Yes, Ive seen beta's carried over after release without a wipe. But these were short open beta's before release. So they were really more of a one month "trial before you buy" system. IE closed beta, Full Wipe, 1 month of open beta (or two weeks) which carried over to release. So its very similar to a wipe before release really. Everyone still started from the same point (the start with nothing)
Some games like Darkfall were in production for 9 years. Darkfall announced "beta soon, signup here" in 2006, but beta didn't start until over 2 years later. The beta lasted almost a year. Its a decent game, and we had fun playing it, just saying that delays and long beta's aren't unusual. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darkfall
Its a long time ago now, but I'm pretty sure i beta tested wow for over a year too (about 18 months I think), they went through various stages of beta.
All in all, I think WoT is pretty much on par with the best of them, their beta isn't that long in comparison, the games pretty stable and bug free, "since its still a few months away from release" (1st Q 2011).
There is one thing that WoT is doing differently to all the other games i've beta tested.
Other games Usually have a long list of things that will be in the release, and every month that goes by they remove a big pile of features and then list them as "not in the release version they will come shortly after release" And you constantly see features being removed so they can get the game out quicker and pickup some cash. WoT on the other hand seems to be the opposite, every time i read a interview or something similar, they are adding more stuff before release, not removing it.
Articles like this for example. http://www.massively...anks/#continued
And overlords post on the clan war's. etc..
Beta's aren't for everyone, A lot of people don't like playing incomplete games and prefer to wait for release so they can play the full polished game. Some people love playing the beta's to help shape it the way they would like it, and get a learning edge for release, And others play the beta with no understanding about what a beta is and just complain that the game isn't finished yet, which is the point of a closed beta , no its not finished yet : )


LiannaSilverwind
Limit of Clan War battle?
arrow
11.11.2010 12:50:36
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Limit of Clan War battle?
Link on message: #220396

View Posthalfik, on 11 November 2010 - 12:37 PM, said: check leagues.
24 teams in champions
18 in junior
8 in absolute
imho this is telling sth about players preferences, dosnt it?

LiannaSilverwind: I agree with your argument, at the same time we must take into account following possibilities:
1) This is CBT, we are unable to buy gold. Gold provides ability to boost up crew, gain credits and transfer Free XP. At release there will be many people who will use opportunity to use their money to help the project, while gaining certain advantages themselves. Paying players won't stop at Tier 8 tanks if they can get Tier 9 (Mediums, TDs) or Tier 10 (Heavies).
2) 2 months into release most clans will have top-tiered tanks for sure.
3) Best rewards are for... Champions League, not Absolute one. :Smile_harp:
4) Champions League format was used in last tournament, so there are many more teams that are specifically trained for that format of a championship.


LiannaSilverwind
Most over and under powered tank?
arrow
11.11.2010 12:11:32
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Most over and under powered tank?
Link on message: #220312

View PostRagor, on 10 November 2010 - 04:07 AM, said: Sorry being a smart-ass. But the T34 was only good compared to its counterparts... PzI-III, later PzIV (where it was mainly outnumbering them - but still loosing*). It was simply brilliant in the way it was manufactured which allowed mass production -> over way more than 30.000 T34 had been assembled!! (germany had ~4k tanks in total)
In these huge numbers they were simply able to swarm. And if one 'bee' broke down on the way to the battlefield -> doesn't matter and no one cares, still 39 left. If a german broke down, 1/8 of the whole force was out of action.

LiannaSilverwind: Commenting about over way more than 30.000 T34 had been assembled!! (germany had ~4k tanks in total). Soviet T-34 variants were made all over the war, not all together at one moment, whilst German tank production was higher than 4k total.
German tank production made about 5.2k tanks (+TDs) in 1941, 9.3k in 1942, 19.8k in 1943, 27.3k in 1944.
Soviet tank production made about 6.6.k tanks in 1941, 24.5k in 1942, 24k in 1943, 28.9k in 1944 and 15.4k in 1945.\
(Based on Overy's "Russia's War", I can check other books if you want, I have lots of them with similar numbers)
One more interesting comparison. T-34 could be made in 3.000 humanhours. Panther in... 55.000 humanhours.
Ideal war machine should not be the most expensive, hard to produce or most armoured. Ideal war machine should be universal weapon, helping its side to win the war.


LiannaSilverwind
Limit of Clan War battle?
arrow
11.11.2010 11:54:16
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Limit of Clan War battle?
Link on message: #220265

View Posthalfik, on 11 November 2010 - 11:19 AM, said: yep devs. no1 want hi end tanks vs hi end tanks.
we want garages full of tanks that will be usefull in clan wars. we want different battles in each province. no limits will kill great idea of end-game in wot.

LiannaSilverwind: Please stop generalizing for everyone. Thank you. :Smile_honoring:


LiannaSilverwind
The took away Dog crying when house run over!!
arrow
11.11.2010 11:51:28
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\The took away Dog crying when house run over!!
Link on message: #220260

LiannaSilverwind: From what I've noticed on Russian forum, developers stated that animal sounds were removed because of Euro-American players negative reaction. So that's result of "our work"... :blink:


Tanitha
Base capture disruption
arrow
11.11.2010 08:40:56
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Suggestions\Base capture disruption
Link on message: #219972

Tanitha: 4 tanks capping.
Each has 20% each = 80%
You combat 1 and kill it.
By then there is 3 tanks with 30% each = 90%
You combat 1 and kill it.
By then there is 2 tanks with 45% each = 90%
Etc..
And your team was capping and both teams capped and there was a draw..
Where the problem came is that you incorrectly tried to kill the enemy tanks, probably firing multiple shots at the tank until it was dead.
You shuold have fired a shot at each while your team was capping, to reset each players timer. Instead of leaving one player to cap to 100%
It would also be my guess that the tank that you left until last was the tank that had the highest/most of the cap in the first place.


Tanitha
Targetting reticle is huge and doesn't change
arrow
11.11.2010 05:37:03
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Targetting reticle is huge and doesn't change
Link on message: #219821

Tanitha: I believe its caused by alt tabbing at the start.


Tanitha
Beta keys
arrow
11.11.2010 04:03:11
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Beta keys
Link on message: #219731

View PostCherry, on 11 November 2010 - 03:24 AM, said: If you need a key or someone of your friends and don't have it, try here;
http://www.mmo-base....action=betakeys
I'm sorry if I posted it in wrong section.

Tanitha: Did you get a key from there recently? did it work ok? when?
thx


Tanitha
2.6 Law Violations
arrow
11.11.2010 02:26:22
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\2.6 Law Violations
Link on message: #219616

View PostRogueci5, on 11 November 2010 - 01:19 AM, said: This is already an issue as demonstrated by a word search on Youtube.

Tanitha: Don't believe everything you read on the net.
As far as I'm aware, there is no hacks or cheats or anything similar for WoT. And everything is still safely stored on their server.
There is however, and always has been, several people who have 100 you-tube accounts, which they use to spread virus's and key-loggers.
One account to make the youtube post, the other 99 to say "OMG it works and no virus download now!."
There has been some bugs in maps where some area's of the terrain can be shot through, these have been or are being fixed. But they are bugs not hacks.
Etc, but no real hacks or cheats.
Macroing is obviously very easy, And freely available.
But the auto bot detectors pick them up pretty easily from their bad playing stats.
For example. 100 games played no shots fired or 100 games played 1000 shots fired no hits is pretty obviously a bot/macro.
All in all Wot is probably the most bug/hack/cheat free game Ive played over the last decade.
But yes Wot has a support department in place which handles bots/afk/tk/etc and the banning of...
From my dealings with them, they seem to be very dedicated and efficient.
They can be contacted here.

Quote 4. REPORTING IN-GAME VIOLATIONS
If you want to report team kill accidents, chat insults, or another case of violation of the Rules send your application to community@worldoftanks.com. The application should contain the complete description of the accident; nicknames of the parties involved, and attached screenshot. That will help us to consider your reports quicker. Any other ways of reporting are not subject to consideration. Any complaints on forums are regarded as off-topic. Time limitation of players’ reports is 7 days. Complaints about earlier accidents are not subject to consideration.

Tanitha:


Tanitha
Update ready for pre-download
arrow
11.11.2010 00:38:56
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Update ready for pre-download
Link on message: #219470

View PostWallachia, on 11 November 2010 - 12:30 AM, said: I don't have torrent.

Tanitha: I don't use torrents much either. But its not too bad to install.
I use uTorrent. Its available here.
http://www.utorrent.com/
You usually need to setup port forwarding for it to work with a decent speed.
http://en.wikipedia....Port_forwarding
It downloaded for me at about 450-600kB's from Australia, my max net speed is 2200kB's.
Its a decent speed but not my max..
Start to finish the download took me 28 mins.
I'll continue seeding, but upload speeds from Australia are low, they usually only give us download speeds..
Ive tried uploading it to rapidshare/hotfile and my own server, All of them say it will take 4+ hours to upload.
Sorry Australian ISP's just don't give us any upload speed, they only give us download speed.


Tanitha
Beta Keys Available Here
arrow
11.11.2010 00:09:52
 
Subject: Archives\Junkyard\Beta Keys Available Here
Link on message: #219416

Tanitha: Updated the links, added the new one (thanks)..


Tanitha
Installation not possible while running Microsoft Security Essentials
arrow
10.11.2010 22:18:39
 
Subject: Archives\Beta\Installation not possible while running Microsoft Security Essentials
Link on message: #219184

View PostHerrKaputt, on 10 November 2010 - 10:07 PM, said: EDIT -- the above problem is SOLVED if I disable the real-time protection of Microsoft Security Essentials. It seems the WOT installation is not compatible with MSE, you folks should try to fix that.

Tanitha: Correct, agreed, thanks for the report.
Have fun playing.


Реклама | Adv