Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Been Playing WOT too long
Link on message: #359927

Link on message: #359927
ARGO: You know when youv'e been over playing WoT when:
You go to put your clothes in the dryer and you slam the door block your ears and yell FIRE!!!
When you start thinking potatoe guns are a good thing.
When you wife goes to wake you up tells you your where talking in your sleep and askes why you where swearing at a guy named ARTY.
When everytime you hear the word "school bus" SU-14a pop in your head.
When your collection of girly mags have been replaced by Tanks Weekly.
When your idea of getting off WoT for a while means sitting on the couch and watching the history channel episodes about tanks.
When your idea of a date is taking your girl to a war museum.
When your at the museum and a seriously well built girl is standing infront of you and you ask her to move so you can get a better view of the Tiger tank.
When you start dressing in full tank garb before playing and set up a fan infront of you to blow your scarf while listening to "Carmina Burana O'Fortuna".
You go to put your clothes in the dryer and you slam the door block your ears and yell FIRE!!!
When you start thinking potatoe guns are a good thing.
When you wife goes to wake you up tells you your where talking in your sleep and askes why you where swearing at a guy named ARTY.
When everytime you hear the word "school bus" SU-14a pop in your head.
When your collection of girly mags have been replaced by Tanks Weekly.
When your idea of getting off WoT for a while means sitting on the couch and watching the history channel episodes about tanks.
When your idea of a date is taking your girl to a war museum.
When your at the museum and a seriously well built girl is standing infront of you and you ask her to move so you can get a better view of the Tiger tank.
When you start dressing in full tank garb before playing and set up a fan infront of you to blow your scarf while listening to "Carmina Burana O'Fortuna".
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Game Mode Suggestions
Link on message: #359788

Link on message: #359788
Tanitha: Yes, other objectives are in planning, it was covered in the
newsletter too.There is many other posts on the topic also..
Locking.
Locking.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\T 34(US) - bugged or just crap?
Link on message: #359727
c1player, on 11 January 2011 - 08:29 PM, said: Hello there
got some questions about the "Heavy" US tanks.
Is that normal that i loose money if i play the T34?
When i use the 105mm gun on my T34 i have to pay 1000cred/shot,
i think its normal and if i got killed i have to pay another ~17.000 cred to rep my tank,
but i dont think thats normal if i loose most of the battles ~5-10k cred because i only get 30k per game!
It does not matter if i kill 0 or 6 tanks. when i was using the T32(US) i was often getting 50k+ cred
if u remove the costs of the ammo and rep i had every time 18k+! so why i loose the money? any reason?

Link on message: #359727

got some questions about the "Heavy" US tanks.
Is that normal that i loose money if i play the T34?
When i use the 105mm gun on my T34 i have to pay 1000cred/shot,
i think its normal and if i got killed i have to pay another ~17.000 cred to rep my tank,
but i dont think thats normal if i loose most of the battles ~5-10k cred because i only get 30k per game!
It does not matter if i kill 0 or 6 tanks. when i was using the T32(US) i was often getting 50k+ cred
if u remove the costs of the ammo and rep i had every time 18k+! so why i loose the money? any reason?
ARGO: Welcome to the above tier 8 club, Time to either get a nice medium
tank to feed your monster or buy a premium account.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Heroes in a Half Shell
Link on message: #359511

Link on message: #359511
ARGO: Now below is the forum rules as they apply to Off-Topic discussion,
Now TauMutantHamster I have highlighted the parts that apply to
this thread.
This is a friendly warning.
POST IS LOCKED AND SENT TO THE JUNKYARD
Argo66
2.4 Off Topic, spamming and trolling
This category includes:
• Excessively communicating the same phrase, similar phrases, or pure gibberish
• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums
• Causing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other posters
• Making non-constructive posts
• Abusing the Reported Post feature by sending false alarms or nonsensical messages
• Numbering a thread, IBTL, TLDR, or any other fad statements
Please make sure that you post your new threads and postings in the appropriate forum. This helps your fellow players and us to maintain an overview and so be able to respond faster with an appropriate answer to your question. Before beginning a new thread, look to see if an active thread on that topic has already been established using the Search feature. If so, place your comments there instead. Keep discussions about one topic to one thread only.
Posts which drift off topic, or content-free posts will be edited or removed. Posting multiple messages with the same content across several forums is unwelcome and inappropriate, since such activities divide the targeted discussions and makes gathering feedback considerably more difficult for us. Such ‘cross posts’ will be merged, closed and redirected or removed. Before beginning a new thread, look to see if an active thread on that topic has already been established using the Search feature. If so, place your comments there instead. Keep discussions about one topic to one thread only.
• If a member is found to have participated in such actions, he/she will:
Be given a temporary ban from the World of Tanks forums, depending upon severity
This is a friendly warning.
POST IS LOCKED AND SENT TO THE JUNKYARD
Argo66
2.4 Off Topic, spamming and trolling
This category includes:
• Excessively communicating the same phrase, similar phrases, or pure gibberish
• Creating threads for the sole purpose of causing unrest on the forums
• Causing disturbances in forum threads, such as picking fights, making off topic posts that ruin the thread, insulting other posters
• Making non-constructive posts
• Abusing the Reported Post feature by sending false alarms or nonsensical messages
• Numbering a thread, IBTL, TLDR, or any other fad statements
Please make sure that you post your new threads and postings in the appropriate forum. This helps your fellow players and us to maintain an overview and so be able to respond faster with an appropriate answer to your question. Before beginning a new thread, look to see if an active thread on that topic has already been established using the Search feature. If so, place your comments there instead. Keep discussions about one topic to one thread only.
Posts which drift off topic, or content-free posts will be edited or removed. Posting multiple messages with the same content across several forums is unwelcome and inappropriate, since such activities divide the targeted discussions and makes gathering feedback considerably more difficult for us. Such ‘cross posts’ will be merged, closed and redirected or removed. Before beginning a new thread, look to see if an active thread on that topic has already been established using the Search feature. If so, place your comments there instead. Keep discussions about one topic to one thread only.
• If a member is found to have participated in such actions, he/she will:
Be given a temporary ban from the World of Tanks forums, depending upon severity
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\So where is the fun?
Link on message: #359395
Keyth, on 11 January 2011 - 05:43 PM, said: I would be interested to hear what fun there is meant to be when
you take your new Tier VI (with an inferior gun to your Tier V) and
consistently get thrown in with Tier VIII to X? Have the developers
stated anywhere that they are looking at matchmaking?

Link on message: #359395

ARGO: This may come across as fluff to some but I also hated getting that
new tank and finding it to be a absolute DOG out of the box but as
I started working on it and improving it, I still love it when you
get to the point where your crew is starting to aim better and the
tanks is moving better. Now I look at it as kind of a learning
curve for that vehicle, the game forces you to either A: hunker
down and learn the tank or B: blow right through it to the next one
which in the latter method usually results in the lack of skills
you would have gained had you stuck with each tank you acheieve.
Sure we all want to move up but when you have tunnel vision to the
next tank, how fun is that?
And yes, The Devs are always working on matchmaking improvements, However there is another factor that even the Devs cannot fix in this game, The human factor.....You can't win them all, especially if you get stuck on a less skilled team.
And yes, The Devs are always working on matchmaking improvements, However there is another factor that even the Devs cannot fix in this game, The human factor.....You can't win them all, especially if you get stuck on a less skilled team.
Subject:
In-Game Vehicles\German Vehicles\Medium Tanks\The VK3601(H)
Link on message: #359350
reaper71, on 11 January 2011 - 02:46 AM, said: Can some one explain to me how this tank is so great. I have only
been playing a couple months so I am not all that experienced with
the tanks. I see all these threads about how great it is but I have
one and it gets one or two shoted every battle just about. I just
dont see how this tank is all that great. I try and snipe but
finding targets is almost impossible sometimes. Anyway if anyone
has any advice how to make this tank better let me know cause right
now I think it sucks.

Link on message: #359350

ARGO: Sucks? Wow I am really surprised, I have had my VK3601H from day
one "July" and I always use it to gain exp, and snipe. The Vk is a
fantastic sniper and I also use it to hunt arty. Have you elited
it? I found that all the guns for the VK work well with exception
to the conicle gun.
This is my VK set up:
Camo net, Camo trained crew, 88mm AP/HE rounds "even amounts".
Hide in bushes and kill anything that moves......I average about 3 kills a game. My record in it for kills is 9.
This is my VK set up:
Camo net, Camo trained crew, 88mm AP/HE rounds "even amounts".
Hide in bushes and kill anything that moves......I average about 3 kills a game. My record in it for kills is 9.
Subject:
In-Game Vehicles\Soviet Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\Sell or Wait?
Link on message: #359325
ikarian, on 02 January 2011 - 03:58 PM, said: Want to sell IS to help fund IS-3, but worth it? feels like i cba
wait for a soft-wipe that never seem to come. And i want to try
IS-3 before wipe, incase i dont like the late Russian heavys. But i
would lose roughly 1mil credits by selling now.

Link on message: #359325

ARGO: Seriously? Try never to sell tanks, always keep them because it
will make grinding for exp easier.....
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\IS-2 mod.1944 frontal upper hull armor plate
Link on message: #359264
JocaTrica, on 10 January 2011 - 12:36 PM, said: I'm sorry if this subject has been already brought up - I couldn't
find any thread specifically mentioning it.
So... as far as I know, historic IS-85/1/2 tank went through several modifications during its lifetime, one of which was improving frontal hull armor in 1944. However, this is not reflected in game, although it should, because this change meant much better protection and increased chance for ricochet:
Let me to picture it better...
pics
Since I find it quite hard to believe that the devs just forgot about this, I suppose there's some good reason why we're not given a hull upgrade for IS. Engine limitations?

Link on message: #359264

So... as far as I know, historic IS-85/1/2 tank went through several modifications during its lifetime, one of which was improving frontal hull armor in 1944. However, this is not reflected in game, although it should, because this change meant much better protection and increased chance for ricochet:
Let me to picture it better...
pics
Since I find it quite hard to believe that the devs just forgot about this, I suppose there's some good reason why we're not given a hull upgrade for IS. Engine limitations?
Overlord: Since these two variants of IS-2 have only slight differences,
mod.1944 is not planned currently. Perhaps later as a separate
upgrade for current IS-1/2.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Nazi Name in the Game
Link on message: #359236

Link on message: #359236
Tanitha: The naming rules are clear, if you wish to report a name violation
do it via support.
Website support.worldoftanks.com or Email support@worldoftanks.com
There is no need to discuss player names..
locking
Website support.worldoftanks.com or Email support@worldoftanks.com
There is no need to discuss player names..
locking
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #359135
Temstar, on 10 January 2011 - 03:54 PM, said: Overlord doesn't sound very sure, I would take it with a grain of
salt.

Link on message: #359135

Overlord: Release was scheduled for Q1 2011 a few months ago. February is
more precise timeline.
Server split procedure has already begun, please follow the updates on the website and forums, more detailed information is to be announced.
Pre-starting procedures in progress, copying player database and final server setup, preparing new web sites and forums.
Server split procedure has already begun, please follow the updates on the website and forums, more detailed information is to be announced.
Pre-starting procedures in progress, copying player database and final server setup, preparing new web sites and forums.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Questions\Graphical Updates of Tank models
Link on message: #359053
ElAtaque1944, on 26 December 2010 - 08:49 PM, said: The Schmalturm of the PzIV needs to be smaller for example.
karl_eller, on 02 January 2011 - 11:17 AM, said: I'm 90% sure the Schmalturm turret is bigger on the Pz4 than it is
on the Panther.
While we're on this topic, the Tiger II needs a model for the 10.5cm L/68, and the JPanther needs a model for the 10.5cm L/56.
NOA, on 11 January 2011 - 03:11 AM, said: Also important is for a look at the tracks on the Tiger I...
currently, they're using the narrow Transportketten, which were
NEVER used in battle. Battle tracks for the Tiger I, the
Breitketten, were used for battle and swapped off for
Transportketten when the tanks were being moved by rail or just
drove between fronts.
ElAtaque1944, on 26 December 2010 - 08:49 PM, said: And of course, tracks of the American Heavies after the M6 -
they´re much too small atm, because the grousers are missing. Here
an original picture:
http://www.wwiivehic...32/t29e3-01.jpg
Maybe you can tell us, what models are going to be fixed? T(h)anks in advance!

Link on message: #359053

Overlord: Any evidence of that perhaps? Schemes, screenshots etc.

While we're on this topic, the Tiger II needs a model for the 10.5cm L/68, and the JPanther needs a model for the 10.5cm L/56.
Overlord: History expert comments:
Tiger I tracks have already been discussed several times. Their width is correct. It's a matter of perception. Narrow transport tracks (Transportketten) were used for transportation. In order to mount them outer row of rollers was removed as well as wide battle tracks (Breitketten), they were replaced for narrower version. When the transportation was over, everything was done in reverse order. This was the requirement of German "Ordnung" for Kursk, North Africa, and black earth of Ukraine.
In late 1944 and 1945 this procedure wasn't followed carefully as before, since it required much time and effort. That's why aces of Panzerwaffe began to mount wide battle tracks without outer row of rollers (sometimes they even used Transportketten in city battles). As a result, late WWII photos feature Tiger with removed outer row of rollers, that's why battle tracks seem to be wider. In game we have an "honest" model with outer row of rollers mounted, and since it goes along the edge of the tracks, visually they seem to be narrower than they actually are. Especially if one expects almost 30-cm gap between MIDDLE row of rollers and outer edge of the tracks (see 1944-1945 photos). If you look at the tank from the FRONT and compare it to the respective scheme - you will make sure that the tracks are of normal width.
Unfortunately this issue arises over and over again.
Tiger I tracks have already been discussed several times. Their width is correct. It's a matter of perception. Narrow transport tracks (Transportketten) were used for transportation. In order to mount them outer row of rollers was removed as well as wide battle tracks (Breitketten), they were replaced for narrower version. When the transportation was over, everything was done in reverse order. This was the requirement of German "Ordnung" for Kursk, North Africa, and black earth of Ukraine.
In late 1944 and 1945 this procedure wasn't followed carefully as before, since it required much time and effort. That's why aces of Panzerwaffe began to mount wide battle tracks without outer row of rollers (sometimes they even used Transportketten in city battles). As a result, late WWII photos feature Tiger with removed outer row of rollers, that's why battle tracks seem to be wider. In game we have an "honest" model with outer row of rollers mounted, and since it goes along the edge of the tracks, visually they seem to be narrower than they actually are. Especially if one expects almost 30-cm gap between MIDDLE row of rollers and outer edge of the tracks (see 1944-1945 photos). If you look at the tank from the FRONT and compare it to the respective scheme - you will make sure that the tracks are of normal width.
Unfortunately this issue arises over and over again.

Overlord: Our guys will check them.

http://www.wwiivehic...32/t29e3-01.jpg
Maybe you can tell us, what models are going to be fixed? T(h)anks in advance!

Overlord:
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Elite tank not showing as elite
Link on message: #358772

Link on message: #358772
Tanitha: Some screenies for starters please.
1. Showing the no badge on the garage.
2. and one showing the full tech tree.
Thanks.
1. Showing the no badge on the garage.
2. and one showing the full tech tree.
Thanks.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Questions\How does HE damage actually work?
Link on message: #358771
captking, on 07 January 2011 - 06:18 AM, said: Still not working like you describe...

HE with 200%+ penetration and only doing 24-30% total shell damage...
EDIT TYPE in the chart. the 2nd Armor Value is Penetration Value
I put 9 into the rear of a Panther...thats 53ish vs 150 at 115 damage...rough math was 1000 damage but only took off 30% from 65% to 35%...thats about 300...
captking, on 11 January 2011 - 12:23 PM, said: any update on this???

Link on message: #358771


HE with 200%+ penetration and only doing 24-30% total shell damage...
EDIT TYPE in the chart. the 2nd Armor Value is Penetration Value
I put 9 into the rear of a Panther...thats 53ish vs 150 at 115 damage...rough math was 1000 damage but only took off 30% from 65% to 35%...thats about 300...
Overlord: What gun are you using? Why some figures are missing?
Do you take into consideration armor slope, 25% spread of penetration and damage?
Do you take into consideration armor slope, 25% spread of penetration and damage?

Overlord:
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Questions\Lower tier company play
Link on message: #358723
roots, on 11 January 2011 - 09:40 AM, said: My question is will when will there be different options to company
play?
F:ex
- Max tier 8, maximum total weight 90
- Max tier 6, maximum total weight 70
- Max tier 4, maximum total weight 50
- Max tier 2, maximum total weight 25
or similar.
This would add so much more flavour to the game and relive us from the random battles that the main source of ingame frustration for many players due to all the
random fail.
Company play atm is hopeless for anyone not in a tier 9 or 10 tank or tier 5 or higher arty (or happy random scout), the "free tier" company play could also use a increase in total points to 120 or so, this would give teams a chance to field 15 tanks or almost 15 tanks, maps gets abit empty with 9-10 tanks/arty on each side.

Link on message: #358723

F:ex
- Max tier 8, maximum total weight 90
- Max tier 6, maximum total weight 70
- Max tier 4, maximum total weight 50
- Max tier 2, maximum total weight 25
or similar.
This would add so much more flavour to the game and relive us from the random battles that the main source of ingame frustration for many players due to all the
random fail.
Company play atm is hopeless for anyone not in a tier 9 or 10 tank or tier 5 or higher arty (or happy random scout), the "free tier" company play could also use a increase in total points to 120 or so, this would give teams a chance to field 15 tanks or almost 15 tanks, maps gets abit empty with 9-10 tanks/arty on each side.
Overlord: Company battles are going to be divided into serveral sub modes:
according to overall tier of a company, limited to min/max tier of
vehicles in it, faction-based company battles.
Most probably overall tier division for companies will correspond to current battle leagues.
Most probably overall tier division for companies will correspond to current battle leagues.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Questions\0.6.2.9 -0.6.3+
Link on message: #358697
deathnoise, on 11 January 2011 - 04:39 AM, said: What about tier 9 arties?

Link on message: #358697

Overlord: Tier 9 SPGs!? Are they planned?
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #357828
Adiyahu, on 11 January 2011 - 01:02 AM, said: they need money to hire some real professionals to run the business
in the western world. PR first, since they've got all talent they
need to make a great game, but lack of something to communicate
with people. PR is not only about what to say, but most importantly
how to say it. A good PR can convert a disaster to a glorious
victory. But of course messing up less a little will also work.
on the other hand i think they are doing excellent job in the RU community, PR inclusively. as an extended market, US/EU is partly ignored at some point - doesn't mean they don't care, they are just too busy polishing the game and taking care of their main market.
happy customer pays, raging player quits. either of them, consequences devs take. quote Overlord "let's see"

Link on message: #357828

on the other hand i think they are doing excellent job in the RU community, PR inclusively. as an extended market, US/EU is partly ignored at some point - doesn't mean they don't care, they are just too busy polishing the game and taking care of their main market.
happy customer pays, raging player quits. either of them, consequences devs take. quote Overlord "let's see"
Overlord: The grass is greener on the other side of the fence.
There have been major faults and mistakes on RU side, which made long 10-month rough road of beta testing to release. Failures for RU side are even more critical, since officially the game is live already. The latest issue occured on December 31, right on the eve of New Year, one of the most celebrated holidays.
We actually learn from our mistakes and updating EU/NA side has ALWAYS gone much smoother, without significant "post patch" issues. And faster. Downtimes here are shorter.
Sorry, just couldn't help posting this.
There have been major faults and mistakes on RU side, which made long 10-month rough road of beta testing to release. Failures for RU side are even more critical, since officially the game is live already. The latest issue occured on December 31, right on the eve of New Year, one of the most celebrated holidays.
We actually learn from our mistakes and updating EU/NA side has ALWAYS gone much smoother, without significant "post patch" issues. And faster. Downtimes here are shorter.
Sorry, just couldn't help posting this.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #357793
WhiteHyena, on 11 January 2011 - 01:00 AM, said: I guess you didn't read the first line in my post? We're getting
our patches from the Russian live servers. The devs aren't making
those patches using data they get from us, they are making them
using data they get from the Russian server. So you tell me, if the
patches/fixes we get are made using from data that server, not
ours, how are we not getting ignored?

Link on message: #357793

Overlord: Closed beta doesn't recieve patches from main Russian server. The
patches are being developed on the basis of data (first of
statistics) gathered from all sources and are totally the same
(apart from language packages).
0.6.2.7 update for closed beta was released on the next day after Russian side. 0.6.2.8 update were released on the same day for both sides.
Clan wars beta is supposed start simultaneous as well.
0.6.2.7 update for closed beta was released on the next day after Russian side. 0.6.2.8 update were released on the same day for both sides.
Clan wars beta is supposed start simultaneous as well.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #357604
Raccie, on 10 January 2011 - 09:23 PM, said: So which one is it? This week or next week? Sounds a bit like the
story about the wipe, the statement from the dev's changes by the
minute....
...

Link on message: #357604

...
Overlord: Latest news from the front, you know. 
Can't guarantee the exact date. The whole server split procedure is rather complex. It begins this week, but one can never be sure. So by the end of the next week is more reliable.

Can't guarantee the exact date. The whole server split procedure is rather complex. It begins this week, but one can never be sure. So by the end of the next week is more reliable.
Subject:
Off-Topic Discussion\Historical Discussion\Inside the Tiger I
Link on message: #357315

Link on message: #357315
ARGO: To think that's a Tiger tank and not a sherman or leo, I felt
clostriphobic just watching that video. Can you imagine trying to
maeuver one of those 88mm shells into the gun while that things
rockin and rollin?
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #357080
wilson124, on 10 January 2011 - 08:20 PM, said: @Overlord,
I would like to know will there any "gift" for the CB player when this game release ?

Link on message: #357080

I would like to know will there any "gift" for the CB player when this game release ?

Overlord: It is under discussion at the moment. So no information. Sorry.
Subject:
Off-Topic Discussion\Off-Topic\The Magic Vending Machine!
Link on message: #357052

Link on message: #357052
ARGO: You get a map to El'Dorado's gold
I put in Mr. Putin.....hehehehe get it.
I put in Mr. Putin.....hehehehe get it.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356963
WingNut, on 10 January 2011 - 07:34 PM, said: @Overlord
Is Wargaming going to release as is or are you guys going to address known issues like invisible tanks?

Link on message: #356963

Is Wargaming going to release as is or are you guys going to address known issues like invisible tanks?
Overlord: This issue will be addressed seriously. Visibility system will be
reworked completely. However it will require some time.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356952
COL_TIKER, on 10 January 2011 - 07:34 PM, said: Will there be a official mention of this as a whole new
thread/newsletter section?

Link on message: #356952

Overlord: Of course, there will be the respective news on the website. The EU
servers should be up and running by the end of the next week.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Graphical bug. Neon outline of an explosion will not go away.
Link on message: #356922
interox, on 10 January 2011 - 04:58 AM, said: Just got it for the 1st time now
http://img641.images.../i/shot038.jpg/
edit- Great stuff, I've changed nothing whatsoever and my games ruined. I was watching a divx movie then fired up WOT and this is the result every map/game now. I've rebooted and the problem persists, never had it befor 15 minutes ago. Feeling pretty effing annoyed right now!
edit2-enabling advanced/post processing fixes it.

Link on message: #356922

http://img641.images.../i/shot038.jpg/
edit- Great stuff, I've changed nothing whatsoever and my games ruined. I was watching a divx movie then fired up WOT and this is the result every map/game now. I've rebooted and the problem persists, never had it befor 15 minutes ago. Feeling pretty effing annoyed right now!
edit2-enabling advanced/post processing fixes it.
Overlord: Turning off forced anti-aliasing in your graphic settings should
help as well.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356910
Gatt, on 10 January 2011 - 07:22 PM, said: Overlord, the mix of used tanks on the russian server is always
german>russian>american?

Link on message: #356910

Overlord: Not this way, but Soviet>German>US.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Current map rotation
Link on message: #356879
Silvar, on 08 January 2011 - 03:07 PM, said: Currently there is something strange going with map rotation and
would need atleast clarification.
Seems there are maps that come up more than others today after playing 40+ games every 3rd map was Malinovka and i think it is bit excessive when you take into account how many maps there are in total.
So my question. What is the current map rotation criteria and how does it work ?

Link on message: #356879

Seems there are maps that come up more than others today after playing 40+ games every 3rd map was Malinovka and i think it is bit excessive when you take into account how many maps there are in total.
So my question. What is the current map rotation criteria and how does it work ?
Overlord: All the maps currently have the same ratio. Apart from sandbox mode
(tier 1-2 battles).
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356874
Leduss, on 10 January 2011 - 07:11 PM, said: Im gonna smile when wargaming puts this game live with so many bugs
still here. And player numbers will drop like flies.
Oh and i dont think anyone want to re-grind that IS-7/Maus again.

Link on message: #356874

Oh and i dont think anyone want to re-grind that IS-7/Maus again.
Overlord: Will see. Almost the same was predicted prior to Russian release.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356858
Azmodanrom, on 10 January 2011 - 03:56 PM, said: could there be an official statement? it;s quite confusing getting
the dev's plans from 1 line responses scattered all over the
forum.
last known official road-map was: EU servers -> start of the OPEN beta + softwipe + clan wars -> game release + hard wipe
now it seems no more soft wipe and release in February.
so open beta is canceled as well? we go directly in release? clan wars is treated as a different product that will have it;s own beta in parallel with WoT CBT/release?

Link on message: #356858

last known official road-map was: EU servers -> start of the OPEN beta + softwipe + clan wars -> game release + hard wipe
now it seems no more soft wipe and release in February.
so open beta is canceled as well? we go directly in release? clan wars is treated as a different product that will have it;s own beta in parallel with WoT CBT/release?
Overlord: EU servers -> open beta -> clan wars beta -> game release
& hard wipe -> clan wars release & clan wars wipe (global map
wipe)
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356857
A_FIELD_MARSHAL, on 10 January 2011 - 03:13 PM, said: The Devs need to stop lying. First they said they were going to
have soft wipe, Next No soft wipe in December then No Soft Wipe at
all. I dont want to trust lying people with money.

Link on message: #356857

Overlord: Is a softwipe a panacea for you? It is needed solely for technical
purposese. Not for fun.
Subject:
In-Game Vehicles\German Vehicles\Medium Tanks\Panther II tech tree vs. T-54
Link on message: #356667
ruhoujinn, on 10 January 2011 - 12:14 PM, said: Hi,
You may find what I have to share interesting

Link on message: #356667

You may find what I have to share interesting
Tanitha: Yes thankyou, its very interesting.
What id like to know though. Is comparing the guns that are "really" used on the tanks.
What i mean is with the T54 its top gun is $1250 a shot, and its 2nd gun is $250 a shot.
So if you want to make a profit in the tank you really need to use the 2nd gun, and I do. So do a lot of others.
Its not really affordable to use the top gun.
Ammo costs as above, are a big thing really.
Like in a usual game where you shoot 20x. the difference between the guns is 20k in ammo bills.
What id like to know though. Is comparing the guns that are "really" used on the tanks.
What i mean is with the T54 its top gun is $1250 a shot, and its 2nd gun is $250 a shot.
So if you want to make a profit in the tank you really need to use the 2nd gun, and I do. So do a lot of others.
Its not really affordable to use the top gun.
Ammo costs as above, are a big thing really.
Like in a usual game where you shoot 20x. the difference between the guns is 20k in ammo bills.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\I pity the fool playing on the German side after release
Link on message: #356409
MasterWolf, on 09 January 2011 - 08:13 PM, said: Well when ever the Super Mods are posting like this - you know it's
not just a whinge from a few
ComfortablyApathetic, on 09 January 2011 - 08:17 PM, said: The mods are just people in the community who keep discussion
civil. Their opinions on balance are no more significant than any
other player and in no way represents wargaming.

Link on message: #356409

Tanitha: That's why mods don't post much except for moderator messages.
When we are discussing the game, in black text, is just as a normal player, we play too ; ).
It means no more or no less than any comments from other players.
As said below.
When we are discussing the game, in black text, is just as a normal player, we play too ; ).
It means no more or no less than any comments from other players.
As said below.

Tanitha: I do like my vk4502p. I just don't like the mouse. I hate it, its
just a personal thing.
And its pretty apparent from my stats in it, 31 games, 29% wins, 449 average exp.
I'm obviously very bad at playing it too : )
However I do know mods that have a Maus and like it. Personal choice I guess.
But I want some kind of speed personally. So the is7 and its 50 will do me, or one of the T9 mediums.
Maybe the E100 will get me to stay German on release. Ive not heard much about it yet really.
And its pretty apparent from my stats in it, 31 games, 29% wins, 449 average exp.
I'm obviously very bad at playing it too : )
However I do know mods that have a Maus and like it. Personal choice I guess.
But I want some kind of speed personally. So the is7 and its 50 will do me, or one of the T9 mediums.
Maybe the E100 will get me to stay German on release. Ive not heard much about it yet really.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Psychological warfare
Link on message: #356385

Link on message: #356385
ARGO: I will say when I first started playing WoT back in July, I was in
a PzII and I decieded to choose "Standard" match to see what bigger
tanks looked like. I will never forget the 1st time I saw the "out
of the box" IS3. I was awe inspired over it's sheer size compared
to my tank and was facinated with the way it looked. My buddy who
was with me said "Wait until you see an IS4" and I was shocked "You
mean there are bigger ones?". Yes I was inspired and wanted to earn
one, also I noticed back then how when an IS3/4 hit the battle
field, all the other tanks ran from them in total fear. It was
amusing to watch but even more amazing the way those ISs just would
one shot tanks. It would and did give the tank a "God like"
Legend.
But then came the soft wipe.....
Now those IS tanks were no longer dealing with little tanks anymore and the "fear factor" they once had started to wear due to people who had shot right up to them and really didn't know how to use them thus giving us all time to study their weakneses and learn how to kill them. Today, I still like the IS tanks looks and I myself drive them but killable or not, God or fraud, They still to me will always have that legendary status.
But then came the soft wipe.....
Now those IS tanks were no longer dealing with little tanks anymore and the "fear factor" they once had started to wear due to people who had shot right up to them and really didn't know how to use them thus giving us all time to study their weakneses and learn how to kill them. Today, I still like the IS tanks looks and I myself drive them but killable or not, God or fraud, They still to me will always have that legendary status.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356246
Baldfish, on 10 January 2011 - 02:59 PM, said: Overlord
Does that mean we will see migration onto an EU server this week? with the possibility of softwipe?

Link on message: #356246

Does that mean we will see migration onto an EU server this week? with the possibility of softwipe?
Overlord: 1. Yes. 2. No
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356218
tinkerer, on 10 January 2011 - 02:48 PM, said: It's hard to imagine to play the game as released. Look at the
state of unfixed major bugs. Server problems. Micro-transcations
not introduced yet.

Link on message: #356218

Overlord: New servers will be added this week. Capacity of US and EU clusters
will be extended to approx 90k concurrent users which is more than
RU cluster has currently.
Micro-transcations will be implemented at release.
Micro-transcations will be implemented at release.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356213
tinkerer, on 10 January 2011 - 02:29 PM, said: What's soon? Web interface... I'd rather the clan wars before
release!

Link on message: #356213

Overlord: Here "soon" means when its ready.
Subject:
In-Game Vehicles\German Vehicles\Heavy Tanks\I loathe the VK4502p
Link on message: #356139
superbabs84321, on 10 January 2011 - 02:03 PM, said: Overlord, does that mean the game will be released before the clan
wars feature will be added?
Babs out!

Link on message: #356139

Babs out!
Overlord: The discussion is here.
Subject: I loathe the VK4502p
Link on message: #356139
superbabs84321, on Jan 10 2011 - 13:03, said: Overlord, does that mean the game will be released before the clan
wars feature will be added?
Babs out!
Link on message: #356139

Babs out!
Overlord: The discussion is here.
Subject: I loathe the VK4502p
Link on message: #356139
superbabs84321, on Jan 10 2011 - 13:03, said: Overlord, does that mean the game will be released before the clan
wars feature will be added?
Babs out!
Link on message: #356139

Babs out!
Overlord: The discussion is here.
Subject:
Archives\Junkyard\Official Hard/Soft Wipe Discussion Thread
Link on message: #356134

Link on message: #356134
Overlord: Clan wars beta is about to start as well soon. Since clan wars will
be using web interface without considerable integration with game
client at least at early stages, the release of the game itself is
not dependent on clan wars release.
Subject:
Archives\Beta\Impressions\More communication between the dev team and players
Link on message: #356113
NateBlack, on 07 January 2011 - 12:23 PM, said: This is my pet peeves. The exchange of information between the
developers and players is, in my opinion, too low. This is
critical. I'm sure most of you players out there want to know
what's going on, you'd like to know if the developers are listening
to your ideas, even if they disagree.
To be honest, one guy (Overlord) posting regularly just isn't enough. Sure, there is a newsletter. It's quite good, I have to admit. But there could be much more of that good stuff. The developers blog section, it's empty! How come? It's a great way to communicate with players, give them/us a chance to comment on ideas and make sure those comments reach those who are involved.
I suspect many developers read the forums, but they might not have the time to write a small essay in anwser to questions that have already been been explaind. I can understand that.
However, I think that if they somehow took the time, this would instill some much needed hope concerning where this game is headed. I feel there is just too many questions left unanswered right now.
Or am I alone in feeling this?

Link on message: #356113

To be honest, one guy (Overlord) posting regularly just isn't enough. Sure, there is a newsletter. It's quite good, I have to admit. But there could be much more of that good stuff. The developers blog section, it's empty! How come? It's a great way to communicate with players, give them/us a chance to comment on ideas and make sure those comments reach those who are involved.
I suspect many developers read the forums, but they might not have the time to write a small essay in anwser to questions that have already been been explaind. I can understand that.
However, I think that if they somehow took the time, this would instill some much needed hope concerning where this game is headed. I feel there is just too many questions left unanswered right now.
Or am I alone in feeling this?
Overlord: Blog will be launched shortly. Our guys are working on curious
stuff for it currently.
Реклама | Adv