Developers posts on forum

KRZYBooP: Howdy Boom Jockeys! If you like driving straight towards the enemy and not turning very much then you will love this tank that is for sale now!  From 10Oct21- 25Oct21, you can get this beast starting at 40.36.For more information on this sale click HERE.

Draschel:  he usually makes it quite clear, he makes remarks about HP difference. He talks about,  ''it is time to make pressure''  or  with, ''I have to go to get as much use as I can''  

Draschel:  No, quickybaby isn't the greatest of people to grab pointers off of. But i'd listen to him before listening to anything from you. Learn how to 3k. How about that.This isn't 2013. You don't understand anything. Nevermind basic principle. People do 2k in tier 8 now. Not tier X.  Learn how to play, Mr. stuck in 2013. 

Draschel:  Yes, I am sure. Destroy the game. because all the  things I want, desire, destroy the game. By the way, not all I drive are tanks like 140, 907, 277, 260, and WZ11111111115A. Actually, none of them are my top tier X Like I wanted over target markers, back in 2012. Hey I wanted an artillery lob-cam view, back in 2013. And I wanted non exclusive gold only premium ammunition, back in 2011. I also wanted +1/-1, not +4/-4, back in 2011. How about hitlogs? Wait, not done yet, I was talking about my brother discussing ways to nerf ridiculous Type 5 right after sirfoch made his complaints movie showcasing Type 5, and the first thing? Of course, the nonsense 1,400 damage HE has to go. And over buffs for Leopard, why not give it high pen HE, and HE damage like E50. And ways to buff FV4005, dude just give it -10 gun dep,  full swivel turret  (gave it half)  950 horsepower tech tree Rolls Royce, and carry 16 rounds (gave it 20)  He complained that 261 can't fire all battle when it had 18 rounds, and I said yes it should have 20. Surprise surprise. But yes, because along with many CCs pointers, a fair +1/-1 spread would destroy the game. So would reduced RNG breadth. Holy moly guacamole orzanel, sirfoch, circon have been complaining about stagnant, broken camo for years now. I'm not one to jump on pro Quicky either, but is it bad to cap tier 1-5 skills on tanks, to reduce clubbing, and to make 6th sense free? Just make stock 6th sense 4s, new skill option 6th sense 2s, and with directive 1.5.s  Guess what, you know what also was exclusive? Premium consumables like large kits, large repairs, premium ammunition, CW tanks. Not anymore, are they? Bond shop sells CW tanks, premium consumables are for credits, premium ammo for credits. Why should bounty equipment remain that way? Why should equipment directives remain that way, contrast to crew skill directives? Sure, yes, but no. I have no idea what I am talking about. And I am out to break the game. Sometimes the way you post, I think you are about as l------ the same as warp, or child. I shouldn't use the word, think. time and time I see it, its more of know.   

Draschel: Can you tell me the lie? I don't bat a blind eye towards someone's efforts and achievement. I am quite serious, which one is erroneous?

Draschel:  He is also quick to apology. for accidental blocking, nudging, Etc  He also shares bushes and side scrape corners, or leaves if too crowded. All these things, that I don't do.....but he's more of a man than me. 

Draschel: Yes, reward and gift tanks, such as T-50-2 and T28HTC, get the experience gains per battle like premium vehicles. Only money separate them.Non tier X (no Chieftain/VK7201/260  Etc) Reward vehicles should get 1.25x credits I think. Bump up current premiums to higher rates. 1.6? 1.7? I am all for making things fairer for free to play individuals, allow for an account to select 2-3, appointed elite vehicles. These would earn more.To explain, lets say someone loves the idea of turret TD, they drive their hellcat or challenger. But won't pay for Skorpion or SU130PMAppoint a charioteer, once fully elite and fully field mod, as mark elite vehicle. That earns, say 1.2 compared to tech trees. 2-3 of these allowed. Tier 8 max 

Draschel: if i had a choice, MM would be top 5 things fixed in WoT right now, for game health. It can certainly be entertained as being top 1. 1  Top 1 would be RNG probably. 25% is grotesque. Drop it down to 7.5%. Publish in-game client reticle random dispersion deviations2  +1/-1  MM spread. This just makes it fairer for everyone, including free-to-play players. It allows a better environment for tech tree grind3  Allow choice, in turning off one class in games. If we can turn off 2 maps? Turn off encounter/grand/assault? Should be able to turn off 1 class4  Something needs to be done with camo. Can be narrowed down to things as Strv or E25, but also applies to more. CVS should be CO skill not equipment5  Vehicular balance. Tier 10.5 tanks like 260, 907, Chieftain, 279E, EBR are problematic. Tier 8.5 tanks, LT432, EBR, Skoda 56, Renee, progetto are problems                              Tied in with vehicular balance, also proper hit-models healthy for the game. Ridiculous cupolas, LFP, shouldn't be the norm6  My personal bias and my flier wildcard, bounty equipment non exclusive. Cost middle ground, set amount as creds + bonds, +required investment  

Draschel:  Because in +2 with top 3,4,5,6,7,8 players as possible potatoes, your team can seriously be doomed. Even if good, -2....tiers below can't hope to contribute But with +1/-1 tighter tier spread teams, the focus of power is alot looser. Your team may still be doomed, though not outright, if your top tiers are potatoes 

Draschel:  Are we looking at the same player?Skoda 56, Bourrat, Rex, TS5, WZ120GFT, 274A, LIS, Progetto, Chimera, Lansen, T-44-100, Renee, Skoda 27, Type 59, Patriot, 122TM, Alt 5, Caernon ax, E75TS, 703-II.....thats a heck of lot tier 8s, that are between 2000-3000 as he said.But not the point, because when you get into a battle with tanks, that aren't capable like the ones listed above.....Like M46KR, T25 pilot, T42, FV4202, Mutz,  Oho,  AT15.....well you know things aren't fun at all 

Draschel:  arta should be +4/-4, and tank classes should be made +1/-1

Draschel:  And if WG firmly believed its MM is acceptable, Sturm panzer and SU5 would still be trying to damage Tortoise or Mauschen and Type 5. KV and T1 Heavy would, also be trying to deal with tortoise, mauschen, Type 5. Does that sound fun?Pz NA38 and M5 Stuart would have to spot in tier 9, and M7, Covenantor would have to in tier XIt is not fine. Matchmaker, alongside artillery, is one of the most changed aspect of the game. Because it is problematic 

Draschel:  It is a valid complaint. While I do agree, I am not the one to sit in battle tail between my legs and cry  -  +2/-2 is quite shameful it still exists. The game taught me how to cope with +4/-4, many years ago, so I have been hardened by the experiences, not to mention premium ammunition cost gold at that point, so you couldn't even fling it around on whims. But it still doesn't change the fact that we don't need this nonsense anymore. +1/-1 is perfectly fine and won't disrupt the game in too many ways, except for the individuals who feel slighted their pref MM tanks have been nerfed. And they can get some bonuses thrown their way for it.  

Draschel:  No.Because Skill4ltu has flight response too. It is different. You hear this, when he talks about abandoning players, leaving flanks, Etc.His words are,  '' it is time to escape from here,  or  I am now in a big s--- ----'' 

Draschel: Turbo can make you faster, as Fridge is surprisingly quick. Make good use of field mod swapping. Rotator and aiming class can buff gun control much better than gun layer, and rotator can even get +bonus % spotRammer, of course is there. Ventilation is also an option. Don't bother with binoculars or exhaust, won't helpWhile hardening may seem waste, it gives you HP of med. Because Fridge has high base HP than other TD, great for trades 

Draschel: posts (and thinking) is why players like this perform like this. Rather poorly. Commentary, on things not understood to begin with. Makes sense. I mean, if it were true no one would play Strv? Leopard 1? Bat Chat or 13105. Grille 15. EBRs, TVP, 50B and T57.And more or less, at least from content and creation I tune into daily, they are wildly popular  

Draschel:  Yes, I understand that. You have to, to consistently work towards a 3-mark. 2k damage, 500 peasants damage. And you get the tier 8 games, your chance to explode with 3kBut the thing is, you have to be 3x more careful. And punishment comes very easy. It is not worth it. Why do individuals have to unfairly rack their brain, like a  end of stage boss.  I understand, it can be rewarding challenging, in a bourratt. A progetto. LIS, RH07. All the power to you. But do you want that, when you are in FV4202? T25 pilot? Mutz? Lets be real.

Draschel:  I had no problem getting into FL battles, even as an arty which last year took 3min waits.And that is 0/0  MM spread, not +/1 -/1. Trust me, we are ready for it. It can come.+1/-1 though will not remove them, will also substantially reduce snowball teams 

Draschel:  He says many.But you are missing the pictureWhenever he talks of patience, it is one of a few things A) Crap maps like sand river (s--- river) he coins it. Airfield (s--- field)  you get the picture. You push, you lose. Patience. Or him camping out in bush ridges, Steppes at spawn, patience. He just wants to see team deployment, and enemy movement. Patience is key. B) Crappy tanks. Low tier tanks. Soft skin tanks.  Patience is important. ''You make pressure, you take one for the team'' C) 12-15min long games. The non 15:3 3min simulators. Sometimes you get the long games. The long games he loves. These games, involve patience, especially with bushy maps and weakened teams, where camo and view range are important.  However, there are times where you must not be patient. And when Skill4ltu isn't in situations described above, he is eagerly seeking out important map control, positions, spotting. Moreso, he does that because of 15-3 simulator, 3 games in 18 min, you need to move to get as much use as you can. In those battles where the battle is decided in 4 min,  you still need to get that 3 -4k combined. Can't do that being too patient. As he says it, ''We have won the battle, It is time to get involved'' 

Draschel:  I was actually wrong, T14 gun-tube  ATGM can reach out to 12km ranges, with a designated illumination. The whole idea of MBTs being dead is Horse-  While not too great for populace to see in peacekeeping....They are incredibly useful in infantry support, and combined arms. Tanks not produced to just kill tanksCountries still producing and upgrading, things like 2A7, M1A2 Sep v3 / 4, T90 MS, K2, Oplat-2They are still willing to go further ahead in MBT design, production, spending Removing a manned turret, and have an autonomous automated design like T14 / T15 is catching on. This frees up crewman space, frees up necessary turret armor as being unnecessary, and focused into a crew capsule. This allows for more space for dual feed gun ammunition automation, greatly improves longevity of crew by separating them from engine and ammunition compartments, and allows for new additions of subsystems because of weight savings. Such as ground radars, larger engines, backup powerpacks, APS defenses, laser warning receivers, or even provision for 2-3 infantry, like pseudo-IFV SPAAG systems of course are linked in with cavalry companies. Not really in the USA  I mean, as something like the AA Linebacker Bradley was a flop, but a dedicated SPAAG. More popular in getting produced and maintained across Europe and Russia/China. The problem with SPAAG are their vulnerability, expense, lack of versatility. Something modern like Tunguska or Type 95, are still essentially thin skins like a Shilka generations before, and are lucky if even with ballistic protection beyond 0.50 cal. This causes alot of concern for front line units. Though something like Loarza actually has T-72 hull and protection, it pays for it by being 46 tonnes and again.....the turret is a thin skin. Tunguska is okay, integrating missiles and autocannon, but because we see a trend of heavier IFV, up-gunned IFV it makes sense IFV modular variants should just replace SPAAG. Like a more sensible AA Linebacker, or CV90 (T15 armata) If tanks are thought as obsolete, attack helicopters and close support fixed wing planes aren't any different. They are incredibly vulnerable. Why have these battlefield loitering units? When mid-altitude fast, high capacity F15E, F18E/F, SU35, JH7 can just be working in tandem with infantry support and observers, dispensing guided bombs. Trouble with air defenses, well before air superiority is a thing to use GA planes, SEAD planes need to clear the way. Oh, and attack helicopters and fixed wing battlefield support craft are fish food for air superiority and multi role fighters. Perhaps not in stupidly depicted circle dogfights that interception just won't do, but stand off beyond LOS engagement, using AWACS. Again, something fighter bombers and strike fighters can do in a pinch, while attack craft won't.  Also another thing becoming normal, comparable to drones.....are AFV  ROWS  turrets. Same principle. And again, bad for attack aircraft just as drones are bad for AFV. Thing is, a ROWS is more flexible, doesn't have a timeline of a drone. With their digital control, target acquisition using tank next generation CCTV and image intensifiers, what is to stop a ROWS with 14.5mm or 20mm autocannon immediately becoming an AA gun if drone/Attack craft are spotted.We know this already. Navy CIWS operate in the exact same way, just more firepower. 

Draschel: it is not fineEvery major streamer admits its BSAnd not needed 2021  

Draschel: Skill4ltu has great info on The Fridge. Its name.Skill4ltu index, just google it. Lots of contentAlthough many think it is terrible, all things considered its average at leastLike a tier 6 Jag Panzer E100, without the armor, but some mobility 

Einzelganger7: They have a red crosshair circle on the tank icon.

Draschel:  I am not going to defend his actions and inexperience, but +2/-2 is unacceptable. Everyone knows that, whether 2,000 PR or 12,000Regardless of what he may say or think, or in battle do - the game won't change much if made -1/+1. And it would be a tonne fairerIS6, KV5, 112, super persh that are paid for and shafted, just have new MM modifiers where they only see 3 tier 9s, so a 3/5/7   7-9, 3/12  8-9, or all T8 WG thought MM was fine, when tier 5 light tanks could go to tier X. And tier 4 arta could see tier 9. How about KV5 and Type 59 stomping T5.How right were they, with 3/5/7 changes? It is quite obvious, that WG doesn't know their own MM and its impact, or whats fair and not fair. 

Draschel: Same with a lack of effort, corelating to potential to lose. 

Draschel: Well, that is off topic. There are very few stealth drones on the planet. Most if not all, are reserved for intelligence agencies and analytics. In any case, painting out a target by laser, radio, radar, signature and then using munitions point towards fighter bomber and tactical strike airpower delivery, at medium or higher altitude. Not a close support aircraft doing it. Not saying a close support aircraft can't but if tries, it becomes vulnerable itself regardless if the target is signaled out for a strike.  Unmanned vehicles are certainly a thing, but tend to be very vulnerable themselves, not having either helicopter dynamics and agility, or fixed wing aircraft ceiling and speed.  

Draschel: I know this may sound really dumb, anti-armor and battlefield support aircraft against a tank (not an SPAAG)  but I really think armata (or T15)  can be especially dangerous to them. T14 and T15, are the most advanced tanks in the world, equipped with 2 powerful identifying radars for battlefield management. The tank itself is able to illuminate, perceive, act upon incoming projectile threats, from most approaches, at up to 1,800m/s. With ongoing testing to further limits, the goal being up to 3,000m/s. The main purposes of course, are ground projected radar for beyond LOS battlefield information, and of course active defense system being able to intercept incoming threat. But what many experts forget and leave out, the array radars also work as any other ground based radar, and can obviously detect traditional radar signature and masses, like attack helicopters and close support fixed wing planes.  The T14 is armed with 2 different gun-tube ATGMs, with max range up to 8,000m. The 1st travels at 660mph, while 2nd more modern ATGM purpose built for its new 2M82 125mm gun flies at 895mph. The T15, can be equipped with rack of AT9-2  ATGM, that have 6,000m range and fly at whopping 1,230mph. Even the slowest velocity of these ATGM, is far superior to the typical ground support aircraft airspeed, especially helicopters. Frogfoot, being the fastest, can't really sustain faster than 610mph and fixed wing attack planes aren't circling the battlefield at max speed. And if thunderbolt or frogfoot use their ceiling to evade, well they can't really do counter-insurgency roles anymore. T15 armata can also swivel and bring into action 2x30mm autocannon, which are essentially AA guns.  Helicopters have an advantage of confusing radar and LOS, by using terrain irregularity permitted by vertical flight. Sure, but that is typically something versus long range surface air defenses or long-range interceptor air-launch missiles. Like stand off MIG31 engaging targets 100km away. Against the closer ranges versus SPAAG, it isn't an advantage anymore. And specifically, ground based targets can move into terrain irregularity far easier too. T14 and T15 also heavily invest into active defense and passive defense, which are highly tuned into countering ATGM HEAT attack.  I know it sounds silly, but it seems these next gen tanks perform a very decent SPAAG role, in themselves. And attack aircraft would do very well to avoid them. Obviously, ATGM aren't genuine ASM weapons, and will definitely have very little use if any at all versus interdictor and tactical strike aircraft. And if this class like frogfoot, thunderbolt, AC130, Yak 130 close support aircraft are forced into ceilings of 5-6,000m they become extremely inefficient in their roles of battle overwatch. If that the case, better off using purpose built fighter bomber and strike fighters, AKA bomb/missile trucks, which much more versatile and useful at altitude, like Tornado ECR, Xian JH7, F15E, F18E, SU34.  Thoughts?  

Draschel:  That they aren't holes? I never knew they were a hole on T29, but knew they were holes on the tanks listed.Maybe because......they have never been holes on T29? A thought.At any rate, who cares?  The cupola is better play. And if 120mm gun, just overmatch 38 roof. Something with high HEAT pen like STA2 and T1LPC  also work 

Draschel: Then why'd you compare?Moreover, you say its only tier 2,3Dude, the account plays tiers 5-6 better too.You are changing your stories now too.  You can't argue with these people. You cannot.That is how they are. They will continue, and continue.  

Jaguarz: Gratz

Draschel: you need to work on consistency.  Those numbers,  Oh my banana  

Draschel:  Remind me though, why are you so eager to point out stats? Just asking.Are you so bitter you feel the need to lash out like that on whim?

Draschel: I am not going to poke too much at the issue, but let us look at this analytically@240-245mm effective, it is outside the realm of most tier 8 tanks, which commonly boast 225mm AP240-245mm is effectively Tier 8  TD  AP, which alot feature 240-250. So that's 50% chance, at least within 200m  (hard to confront an 110E5 that close) Is this necessarily a problem? This cupola is stronger than object 268 V 4, comparable to things like ST-I and T62A The problem really, are when when these tanks are compared to existing dominant things like Kran in rankedWhich doesn't have a cupola issue. This needs to be changed, add an Emil 1951 style cupola to Kran. Things like Super conquer, has an auto-ricochet angle cupola, which just leads to shooting it with HEAT. 279E, Chieftain just have very small cupolas, even if they are not as thickly protected.Or people wanting .....an 110E3 freaking cupola on their 110E5, which should never happen.I'd like to remind people, that 110E5 cupola, is stronger now than it was starting out. Alot stronger  

Draschel:  This is disgustingly false. Can't you read the numbers in front of you? Although the people looked at, don't invest and heavily paly artillery, THEY STILL DO IT BETTER THEN YOUBoth these people, and looking at me in service record, play at a HIGHER LEVEL THAN YOUR artillery.You deal 1,531 damage per game in artillery. You have marked that, at painstakingly 1,100 battlesBoth the guys in question, are DEALING HIGHER than 1,531 DPG in their arta. With comparable WRAnd we are not just talking damage. Higher KPG, higher base exp too. Where are you getting your numbers? Why are you lying? Why make crap up?  JUST BECAUSE they don't play arta to your massive amount of games, or tie their accounts to arta, don't mean they are bad at itIF THEY WERE LIKE YOU, and just did so, tying their account to arta investment, they'd be far superiorYou have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. And talk just for the sake of talking. Can't read, either  

Draschel:  I think you would have more fun time, grinding tier 6 tanks than trying to 3 mark higher tier prems......you don't seem the 3-mark variety.  

Draschel:  I don't see any point of the request. This game, isn't vietnam. And neither, did the player posting, go himself or herself to vietnam. This is a troll post. The player, hasn't earned an M60. And neither earning, but even putting the effort to buy one. Simple as that.The user, is even lucky such an affordable price is available for a tier X reward tank.  It should be 25,000 bonds not 16,000 

Draschel: They are holes in the tanks like E50, E75, Kran

Draschel: like where is even the comparison. ostrich is playing 3k + WN8. and you won't lid it. You have difficulty maintaining even 1,200. Where is even the comparison? When you perform sooooooooooooooooooooo  poorly, yet try to get others to prove if they are poor or not, but even if they WEREN'T poor players in comparison, what does it matter? You just shun it in the end. And that is the issue. Terrible attitude. 

Draschel:  It wouldn't matter.Ostrich is already substantially, not just better, but substantially better, than you. Bavor too. Kefic too.  There is something trending here, isn't there. You argue with people, substantially better, and even if it widely known you make up new excuses. And you discard. So EVEN if it were the case, that you believed what I just showed, and I play the account every flipping day I am not working, you would make up another excuse. That is how you work. That is how you function. It does not matter. While you call bull, I already know the bull. I didn't ask you to be shallow, full of excuses, but you are. And poor performer, to boot. The only solution is learning how to play. Not in an artillery, because every single soul already knows how to play with artillery. Artillery is the class, with 8, not 2 training wheels. 

Draschel:  You said it, yourself. You are a casual. Don't forget it.  

Draschel:  It is sort of sad some folks feel the need to stay in tier IV and V. 

Draschel:  but you wouldn't beat up on new players. Since you play rather poorly, and they are new - it is a level playing field https://ibb.co/2gxfHCvFunny, though we both have 27,000 battles, you play considerably poorer, 2,500 difference. 15x the top guns, 4x the high caliber. Even funnier, we both extensively play SU-14-2. Its ridiculous how my DPG is 300 pts more, 2.25% WR more, and +1.00 KPGAnd I'm not even an arta. Goes to show people, anyone can play well these things. afforded all the time in the worldhttps://tenor.com/vi...ons-gif-8025433