games 2 levels above you - not worth playing

Draschel:  Yes, I am sure. Destroy the game. because all the  things I want, desire, destroy the game. By the way, not all I drive are tanks like 140, 907, 277, 260, and WZ11111111115A. Actually, none of them are my top tier X Like I wanted over target markers, back in 2012. Hey I wanted an artillery lob-cam view, back in 2013. And I wanted non exclusive gold only premium ammunition, back in 2011. I also wanted +1/-1, not +4/-4, back in 2011. How about hitlogs? Wait, not done yet, I was talking about my brother discussing ways to nerf ridiculous Type 5 right after sirfoch made his complaints movie showcasing Type 5, and the first thing? Of course, the nonsense 1,400 damage HE has to go. And over buffs for Leopard, why not give it high pen HE, and HE damage like E50. And ways to buff FV4005, dude just give it -10 gun dep,  full swivel turret  (gave it half)  950 horsepower tech tree Rolls Royce, and carry 16 rounds (gave it 20)  He complained that 261 can't fire all battle when it had 18 rounds, and I said yes it should have 20. Surprise surprise. But yes, because along with many CCs pointers, a fair +1/-1 spread would destroy the game. So would reduced RNG breadth. Holy moly guacamole orzanel, sirfoch, circon have been complaining about stagnant, broken camo for years now. I'm not one to jump on pro Quicky either, but is it bad to cap tier 1-5 skills on tanks, to reduce clubbing, and to make 6th sense free? Just make stock 6th sense 4s, new skill option 6th sense 2s, and with directive 1.5.s  Guess what, you know what also was exclusive? Premium consumables like large kits, large repairs, premium ammunition, CW tanks. Not anymore, are they? Bond shop sells CW tanks, premium consumables are for credits, premium ammo for credits. Why should bounty equipment remain that way? Why should equipment directives remain that way, contrast to crew skill directives? Sure, yes, but no. I have no idea what I am talking about. And I am out to break the game. Sometimes the way you post, I think you are about as l------ the same as warp, or child. I shouldn't use the word, think. time and time I see it, its more of know.