Developers posts on forum

Sehales: Naja, das wäre ja ein leichtes es einfach auszustellen für diese Accounts oder in der Datenbank auf "over 9000" zu setzen  

Sehales: Hoffen wir mal, dass nicht so viele Typen "Müll reden", aber zu sagen, was einen stört ist immer besser, als nur auf "Minus" zu drücken. (natürlich bitte konstruktives Feedback).  

Sehales: "Die eigenen Leute" waren schon immer "betroffen" und das hätte man ja auch einfach abstellen können, für die entsprechenden Accounts, somit verstehe ich nicht, was du damit sagen möchtest. Hierbei nochmal ein Hinweis: Bitte nicht das Community Team (CM/CC), also die Community Manager/Coordinator mit den Community Contributoren (CCT) verwechseln! Letztere sind normale Spieler, erstere sind Angestellte von Wargaming.

MrConway:   As the "Master Gunner" award can be completed over the course of multiple battles, it does not show up on WoTReplays and is not counted towards the total.

Falathi:  

Falathi:   Bardzo proszę o nie poruszanie wątków politycznych na forum. Ja rozumiem, że łatwo przepłynąć od minusów do minusów, ale naprawdę to nie jest miejsce. 


Ad rem: Ode mnie będą plusy. Ma je zapewnione w każdej ilości. 

Karlie: Round 8 starts at 20:35 CET.

Karlie: Hello all,   Tonight we'll have a livestream of our tournament (starting from Round 8), not many spoilers here just make sure to tune in at 20:30 CET to http://www.twitch.tv/still_mojo    For the battles, we changed settings to allow spectator tank to join. DO NOT USE THE SLOT FOR 8TH PLAYER. NOR EXTRA TIER POINT. Rules are the same, 7 players per team and max 42 points. Settings are changed to 8 players and 43 points to allow 1 spectator tank which is tier 1. Do not fill this spot! Teams using it will be disqualified.   Spectator tank is wg_esports_eu09   If you have any questions please write them in Q&A   Cheers!

Karlie: Round 7 starts at 19:46!

OldFox: Прошу прекратить оффтоп, иначе начну наказывать.

OldFox: Возможно, это акк супер-тестера, на который в награду за работу начислили подарочный танк.  

Tanatoy:   Tututute. J'ai une des meilleures eréputations des forums WG. "Se drape dans une cape appartenant à Alain Delon".

Ectar:   You know last year we could get free drinks throughout the day and a free lunch. It was only late on Sunday afternoon I realised the canteen has Irn Bru on tap.  I cried.

Gepard_PH:   That's unfortunately not possible with Facebook contest at the moment, as we would have to verify all contest entries. However, it's a very neat idea for future contests and I will definitely look into technical possibilities to run such contest later this year. Thank you for your feedback

Tanatoy: Merci à Xaintailles d'avoir ouvert ce sujet. Je souhaiterais s'il vous plaît que nous restions comme il l'as annoncé avec juste une explication de ce que vous souhaitez et non de partir en débat (il y a déjà assez de sujets comme cela), cela nous facilitera le travail pour communiquer les retours de ce sondage. 

Tanatoy:   J'aurai dû préciser les questions pertinentes ^^  

Tanatoy:
Duvduv, entre mettre un -1 et expliquer pourquoi l'on n'est pas d'accord avec une personne, je pense qu'au contraire au lieu de surprotéger les gens, on les responsabilise, c'est à dire qu'on les pousse à argumenter au lieu de juste montrer leur désapprobation en un clic. A titre perso, ayant vu les dégâts qu'à causé ce système de -1, je pense que ce changement est positif, et cela évitera une chose : la création de sujets dans le style "Pourquoi je me suis pris -20 ?" ou pousser les gens à créer des comptes doubles/triples juste pour pouvoir mettre de -1 à une personne qu'il n'apprécie pas.  

Ectar:   Sleep well Community account, the pain will be over soon.

Ectar:   The issue regarding Unsportsmanlike Conduct has been replied to by myself in various topics already on the forum. This is something that our Customer Support team are dealing with. We have passed on our feedback from the forums and continue to do so weekly/daily. Passing on those concerns however is not something which we can guarantee will result in immediate action.   Regarding claims of rigging the T22sr missions this has also been addressed on the forums by myself today. Making changes to the forums has nothing to do with either of those categories nor does it take any time or focus away from them.  

Ectar:   The "Community" account has a negative value. That's a automated account that simply cross posts the portal articles and creates a forum thread.  After a while it became the "thing" for players to downvote news articles no matter the subject and with no reason ever given. When a thread has -60 and only 3 replies that doesn't really help anyone gather feedback other than "they don't like what was said". The immediate comeback is "why don't they like it" to which there wasn't an answer.    Regarding WG staff members, without checking individual accounts, pretty much all Community Team members have positive rep. Now in saying that even for individual staff members the "negative" feedback many received through this system is essentially 2 or 3 trolls clicking on their account weekly and then downvoting their recent posts regardless of what was said.  I fail to see how 1 person using 5 alt accounts to downvote a person (and not what the person is saying) is valid feedback or feedback that we can use to help shape the game or change what we're saying.   When it comes to the FORUMS we want to make this place as welcoming as possible and we feel this change will genuinely help players share opinions and views relevant to the topic. Whilst I appreciate that some players feel there is more pressing issues in the game to deal with, please remember we're not the Customer Support team who deal with account issues just like we're not the Development team who deal with map balance.   Lets keep this on topic please. There is more than enough thread about Unsportsmanlike Conduct, arty balance, matchmaker etc etc without the need to raise the issue here.  I'm pretty disappointed to see people who should know better, coming here to troll and representing a perfect example of exactly why this forum system needs reworked.      

Ectar:

Ectar:

Gepard_PH:   In Holiday Challenges Facebook contest we got almost 33000 comments from almost 13000 participants. Please keep in mind that World of Tanks has several Facebook pages in all supported languages and you can't see all of them by default. On our English profile, there might have been 2 or 3 thousands comments for each mission, but also there were as many (if not more) participants from Poland, Czech Republic, Germany etc.

Gepard_PH: Obviously it's hard for WG to play detectives and research every single comic submitted. But if the results are public players can help with the 'detective work' and keep these contests clean and fair for everyone participating.   Very often there are controversies about contest results, and I believe it's in everybody's best interest to have as few of them as possible. As you can see I'm not ignoring your reports.

Ketankis:   Už zveřejněné jsou:  English Speaking Community→ Forum→ Community Area→ Contests→End of Year Contest Winners

WG_Lumberjack: Dowódcy! W dniu 18.01.2016 zamierzamy usunąć obecny system reputacji zastąpić go nowym, skupiającym się na wyrażaniu uznania dla pomocnych lub przemyślanych postów na forum.
Nowy system umożliwia Wam polubienie posta w sposób podobny jak w przypadku wielu innych miejsc w internecie takich jak Facebook, czy Twitter. Podobnie jak tam, nie będzie można po prostu pokazać swojego niezadowolenia w inny sposób, niż przez napisanie własnego posta. Mimo, że brzmi to jak kolejny system który ogranicza się budowania wyłącznie pozytywnej reputacji, dla elementy decydują o jego odmienności:Kiedy polubisz czyjś post, inni czytelnicy forum będą mogli zobaczyć, że go polubiłeś. Będzie można zobaczyć wszystkich, którzy polubili dany wpis. Ilość polubieni otrzymanych przez danego gracza nie będzie dłużej wyświetlana, czy pokazywana w profilu gracza (dotyczy to również obecnie istniejącej reputacji)Oprócz tego, aby tym dobitniej wskazać wpisy na forum cieszące się popularnością zmienimy wymagania, co do ilości polubień potrzebnej, by post zyskały status „Popularny”. Jak dotąd potrzebne było 50 kliknięć na plus, ale w ramach nowego systemu wystarczy 25 polubień. Będziemy śledzić działanie nowego systemu po jego wprowadzeniu i jeśli zajdzie taka potrzeba wprowadzimy dalsze poprawki.Niezależnie od tego, czy jako czytelnik forum zwracałeś uwagę na reputację, czy też całkowicie ją ignorowałeś faktem jest, że dotychczas istniejący system był niekiedy nadużywany, co prowadziło do nieciekawych skutków, w tym uznawania forum za mało przyjazne miejsce przez graczy, którzy z pewnością skorzystaliby z jego zasobów i możliwości. Oprócz tego, prowadziło to do sytuacji, gdy gracze bardziej skupiali się na punktach reputacji, niż faktycznej wartości merytorycznej konkretnych wpisów.
Wasze opinie są dla nas bardzo ważne i nawet pomimo ogromnego wzrostu liczebności graczy na takich stronach jak Facebook, forum wciąż pozostaje dla nas bardzo ważnym źródłem Waszych opinii. Z tego względu chcielibyśmy, by fora były tak przyjazne użytkownikom jak to możliwe, a zwrócenie większej uwagi na zawartość postów jest niewątpliwie ważnym krokiem naprzód. 

Brynd: Greetings Commanders!   On Monday, January 18th we intend to remove the reputation system and replace it with a new system for showing your appreciation of helpful or insightful forum posts.   This new system allows you to show you “Like” a post, similar to the system currently in place for online services such as Facebook or Twitter. Just like with those places, you will be unable to show you do not like a post and will instead need to convey your disagreement by writing your own constructive reply to the thread. Though it sounds similar to just allowing only positive reputation, there are two further aspects to the new system that make it different:   When you Like a post, other forum users will be able to see that you have liked it, and indeed everyone who has clicked Like on a post. The amount of Likes received by a player will no longer be counted or shown in their profile (and the existing reputation count will no longer appear).   In addition to this new system, to further accentuate forum posts that a lot of players like, we are adjusting the requirements for a post to receive the “Popular” icon. In the previous system a post required 50 up-votes to acquire the icon, but with the new system a post will only require 25 Likes. Furthermore, you will be able to Like up to 15 posts a day, up from the 5 up-votes you can currently award. We will continue to monitor this after implementation and may make tweaks if necessary.   Whether you take notice of forum reputation or ignore it, in some cases the “vote down” functionality of previous system was being abused, leading to some unfortunate consequences – including sometimes making the forum not feel as welcoming to players that would otherwise benefit from making use of it. Also for some it could lead to an unintended fixation on player reputation rather than a focus being on the actual content of forum posts.   Player feedback is very important to us and even with the dramatic growth of player presence on places like Facebook in particular, the forums still remain a strong source of player feedback for us. Because of this we felt that keeping the forums as welcoming as possible, as well as maintaining a focus on the actual post content, was important going forward.

Ectar:   No idea of booth arrangements this year, for 2015 the computers were in the Tamiya Hall as previous years but the truck was out beside the Conservation Hall. I was in the Tamiya Hall pretty much all weekend.

Tanatoy: Bonjour à tous, A la date du 18 janvier, nous avons l'intention d'enlever le système de réputation mise en place et de le remplacer par un nouveau système pour montrer votre appréciation d'un post que vous jugez utile et constructif. Ce nouveau système vous permettra "d'aimer" un post, ceci étant similaire au système en place sur des services de réseaux sociaux comme Twitter ou Facebook. Comme sur ces endroits virtuels, vous serez dans l'impossibilité de montrer que vous n'aimez pas le post en un clic et vous devrez montrer votre désapprobation par une remarque constructive. Même si cela semble similaire au système actuel, en n'y laissant que l'option des "+1", il y a deux choses qui y amène une différence :  - Lorsque vous aimez un post, les autres utilisateurs du forum seront dans la possibilité de le voir.- Le nombre de "J'aime" reçu par un joueur ne sera plus inscrit sur son profil et la réputation actuelle ne sera plus montré. En plus de ce nouveau système, pour augmenter la visibilité des posts que les joueurs aiment, nous allons changer les prérequis pour un post afin qu'ils reçoivent l'icone "Popular" (comme par exemple ce sujet). A l'heure actuelle, un post a besoin de recevoir +50 pour recevoir cette icone, cela va être changé à 25. De plus, vous pourrez "Aimer" 15 posts par jour, au lieu des 5 actuels. Nous regarderons les résultats de ces changements et changeront ces chiffres si cela est nécessaire. Que vous fassiez attention ou non au système de réputation du forum ou non, vous êtes probablement au courant que ce système a parfois donner lieu à des abus, cela pouvant amener des posteurs à s'exclure eux-mêmes du forum, alors qu'ils auraient pu bénéficier d'une explication constructive. Certains aussi pouvaient faire une fixation là dessus au lieu du contenu du post en lui-même. Vos retours sont importants pour nous et nous souhaitons garder un environnement sain pour vous et pour nous sur ce forum, nous espérons que vous pourrez apprécier ce changement, que nous pensons positif pour l'ambiance entre les posteurs.  Je répondrais le plus possible à vos questions à ce sujet. 

PanzerGert: Grüße Kommandaten!   Am 19.01.2016 beabsichtigen wir die Reputationsfunktion auf ein neues System umzustellen, welches die Wertschätzung für hilfreiche und aufschlussreiche Forenposts besser wieder gibt.   Dieses neue System wird es euch erlauben ein Post zu “liken”, also mit „Gefällt mir“ zu markieren, ähnlich den Systemen welche man von verschiedenen Social Media Plattformen kennt. In diesem Zusammenhang wird es nicht mehr möglich sein ein Post negativ zu bewerten, sondern muss seine eigene, konstruktive Antwort verfassen wenn man nicht übereinstimmt. Während es im ersten Augenblick ähnlich dem klingt, das man nur positive Reputation erlauben würde, so gibt es zwei weitere Aspekte die es davon unterscheiden:   Wenn man ein Post „liked“, werden alle Forenuser sehen können wer dieses vergeben hat. Die Anzahl der „Likes“ werden nicht mehr auf den Account hoch gezählt, sondern sind nur für das jeweilige Posting gültig und ist daher nicht mehr auf dem Profil sichtbar.   Zusätzlich zu diesem System und um Forenposts besser hervorzuheben, welche von vielen Spielern mit „gefällt mir“ markiert wurden, werden die Anforderungen an das „Popular“ Symbol angepasst. Statt der bisher benötigten 50 Abstimmungen werden nun 25 „Gefällt mir“ Angaben dafür benötigt. Weiterhin werdet ihr in Zukunft 15 „Gefällt mir“ Angaben pro Tag machen können. Wir werden diese Änderungen im auge behalten und eventuell anpassen, sollte sich herausstellen das die Anzahl der „Gefällt mir“ Angaben nicht passend ist.   Ob ihr Forenreputation wahrnehmt oder ignoriert, in einigen Fällen wurde die „Minus Reputation“ Funktion missbraucht. Dies hat teilweise zu sehr unschönen Konsequenzen geführt, inklusive Spielern, welche die Foren dadurch vollständig mieden und sich nicht in der Form willkommen fühlten wie es hätte sein sollen. Ebenfalls führte dies zu reputationsbezogenen Threads, statt um das Thema selbst zu behandeln.   Das Feedback der Spieler ist wichtig für uns und auch mit dem erheblichen Zuwachs an Spielern welche Facebook, Twitter oder andere Plattformen nutzen, ist und bleibt das Forum eine starke Schnittstelle zwischen uns als Wargaming und den Spielern. Aus diesem Grund sehen wir es als notwendig an die Foren so willkommen wie möglich zu gestalten, als auch einen Fokus auf die aktuellen Inhalte für die Zukunft.
 

vuque: Merhaba Komutanlar,   18.01.2015 Pazartesi günü forumlardaki itibar sistemini (Mesajlara verilen +/-‘ler) kaldırmayı planlamaktayız. Bu sistemi, anlayışlı veya yardımcı olan mesajlara takdirinizi gösterebileceğiniz yeni bir sistem ile değiştireceğiz. Bu yeni sistem şu anda hizmette olan Facebook, Twitter gibi online hizmetlerde olduğu gibi sizin bir mesajı “Beğendiğinizi” göstermenize izin verecektir. Bu sistemlerde olduğu gibi bir mesajı beğenmediğinizi gösteremeyeceksiniz ancak bunun yerine mesajı neden beğenmediğinizi kendi yapıcı açıklama mesajınız ile konu içerisine yazmanız gerekecek. Bu değişiklikler ile sadece pozitif itibar sistemine izin verildiği gibi bir görünüm oluşsa bile yeni sistemin değiştirdiği iki nokta bulunmaktadır: Bir mesajı beğendiğiniz zaman, diğer forum kullanıcıları bu mesajı beğendiğinizi görebilecektir. Bir oyuncunun aldığı beğeni miktarı artık kayıt altında tutulmayacaktır veya profillerinde gösterilmeyecektir. (ve şu anda geçerli olan itibar sistemi puanlarınız artık gözükmeyecektir.)   Yeni sisteme ek olarak, pek çok oyuncunun beğendiği gönderileri vurgulamak için, bir gönderinin “Popular” ikonu alabilmesi için gereken şartları düzenlemekteyiz. Eski sistemde bir gönderinin bu ikonu alabilmesi için 50 artı alması gerekmekteydi, fakat yeni sistem ile gönderinin 25 beğeni alması yeterli olacaktır. Dahası, günde 15 gönderiye kadar beğenebileceksiniz, bildiğiniz üzere bu daha önce günde 5 artı ile sınırlıydı. Değişiklikleri uyguladıktan sonra gözlemeye devam edeceğiz ve eğer gerekli olursa ayarlamalar yapabiliriz. Forum itibarına önem verseniz veya görmezden gelseniz bile, bazı durumlarda eski sistemdeki “eksi verme” işlemi suiistimal edilmişti ve bu durum bazı talihsiz sonuçlara sebep olmuştu – forumdan diğer türlü faydalanacak kişilere forumda istenmedikleri duygusunu vermek dâhil. Ayrıca forum gönderisinin içeriğine odaklanmak yerine oyuncu itibarına odaklanılması gibi istenmeyen sonuçlara sebep olabilmekteydi.   Oyuncularımızın geri bildirimleri bizler için çok önemli ve Facebook başta olmak üzere bu tarz yerlerdeki oyuncu mevcudiyeti dramatik bir artış gösterse bile, forumlar bizim için oyuncu geri bildirimlerini alabileceğimiz güçlü bir kaynak olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu sebeple gönderi içeriğine odaklanmanın ilerlemek için önemli olduğunu ve forumu mümkün olduğunca sıcak bir ortam olarak tutmamız gerektiğini hissettik.

Tanatoy: Donc sur les 15 premiers, on a au moins 5 francophones. Encore un gros GG les gars  

Pour le(s) cas de plagiat, je peux vous confirmer que nous sommes bien au courant de tout cela et soucieux de faire respecter les règles à ce sujet.

Édith : "Contournement" du règlement, on aura tout lu. 

Ectar: Will be there with an even better presence than last year (and a better way of doing the booth/goodies).  If you're going and want to say hello, please introduce yourself. I'm at the stage now where people know who I am and will frequently say "Hello Ectar" or stop and chat and never give their name!

vuque: Leichttraktor   tankı var toplam 5 savaşa girmiş    bu nasıl adalet beyler .. Madem yapmayın kardeşim böyle yarışma falan       BeatBox_Emre isimli kullanıcı çizim yarışmasına gösterdiği katılım ile ödül kazanmaya hak kazanmıştır. Oyuncunun savaş sayısı bu durumda bir önem teşkil etmemektedir. Yaptığı çizimin kalitesi ön plandadır. Umarız sizler daha iyi çizimlerle bundan sonraki yarışmalara katılım gösterirsiniz ve sizler de kazanırsınız.    

Delhroh:   Esa probabilidad exite, pero eso no significa que vaya a producirse.

Delhroh: Eso no quita que el E-25 esté en algún especial o como recompensa de algún evento... recordad que ya informamos de la retirada del E-25 tiempo atrás.

PanzerGert:  

PanzerGert: LINK  

PanzerGert: LINK   Hmm, was soll ich jetzt dazu schreiben. Der Kollege hat es jetzt erstmal, danach sehen wir weiter.

Delhroh:   Eso no va a ocurrir nunca más. El E-25 se ha convertido en otro "Type 59".   Saludos.

Ectar:   I agree, which is why that I ask the person who has gathered all this evidence is the one who makes the ticket.  Multiple ticket with "look at this thread on the forums" won't help and most of them will be closed with generic answers. It wouldn't result in say 10 different CS agents all doing their own investigations.  I can assure you as soon as something on the forums is roughly more than 5 pages it's already been passed on internally or we've checked with our CS team to see if there is tickets reporting the same issue.  

Ectar:   I'm not going to discuss internal policies and procedures so people can then pick them apart and make assumptions how things should be done differently to suit their individual issue. You can't claim someone has been treated differently (and in doing so, it's unfair they were treated differently) and then in the same breath ask for special treatment for another issue.   As I've said in the past treating everyone equally and asking for special treatment for yourself or your concerns doesn't go hand in hand.   In my role I represent the Community and you can be sure as hell I do that to the best of my abilities and the restrictions within my role. I don't always see eye to eye with other departments but then I'm one of the people who interacts with players the most so my view of things is always going to be different from how someone in marketing, development or finance sees things.  That doesn't always work in my favor because I can be just as passionate on an issue as any player is and I can safely say I'm not always the best at getting my points across in a calm and polite manner.  I'd like to think by now that players who have spoken to me on the forums over the past 3 years and especially anyone who has talked to me at events knows that I'm genuine and don't just spin a tale of misdirection each time and post about nothing other than sunshine and rainbows.   If I have it in my powers to do something which benefits the Community, I will always do what I can.  Sometimes you have to accept however that what I can and cannot do is limited. Because I can't give a direct answer to a specific scenario doesn't mean I don't care. In most circumstances I'm doing what I can behind the scenes and making sure the relevant people are aware of what's being said and at the same time making sure that people get in touch with those relevant people. 

Gepard_PH: I've added top 25 selected comics here. Enjoy!   Unfortunately, one of the selected comics turned out to not comply with rules. Winners list on the portal will be updated accordingly soon.

Ectar:   I have gone over to the CS team as well as my direct superior, and the answer I was given is that this needs to be reported via ticket. It's my role to pass on information issues and concerns to other departments within Wargaming. I can never make any guarantees however that a specific concern will be actioned or that players will get exactly what they're asking for.  Players are asking how we are going to deal with this, I've advised players how to raise their concerns through the appropriate channels.  Again whilst I appreciate some players frustration, the Community Team isn't a "backdoor" into getting Customer Support issues looked into and we can't speed up answers for players or give you a different result.  

Tanatoy:   Lul. Joue pas la victime 2015 n'ayant pas était trop une année de cachot pour toi, ou amplement mérité (mai 2015 ?) Mais la suite se fera en pm. Allez bon retour ici ! 

Tanatoy:   Oh didiou, un revenant ! 

Ectar:   It's not the only reason, but it is explained well.  With larger maps and the game as it is now, mediums and lights would be fighting each other mid map, then they need to push against heavies behind them and TD's who are waiting/defending. When playing the T28 Prototype there is multiple matches where I find I miss the main action then am forced into defending against the enemy team pushing into my base. The PzIIJ has the same issue (although I hardly play it).  You're basically too slow to contribute to the main fights. Without adequate cover to move up with, the slow heavies and TD's would be wiped out when spotted by light who would be more active with the larger map.   In the video Slava mentioned that having 2 spawns per team could resolve that (with slower tanks starting further forward for example) however that opens up a different discussion and goes off topic from the main subject which is the maps.

Tanatoy:
J'étais en charge de la vérification des personnes tirés au sort pour le concours sur Facebook ( ce qui fait une vérification d'environ 2500 commentaires) et je t'avoue que quand j'ai vu ton pseudo, j'ai bien était tenté de te balancer une petite pique en PM . Tu va voir, la clé USB est tout de même assez pratique , mais fais gaffe à son poids, c'est du "costaud".

Tanatoy: Ah !! C'était toi celle-là (ne me souvenant pas de toutes les participations) ? Boarf, pas de quoi, le travail est de qualité, il est logique que tu ais eu un bon placement.

Ectar: I fully appreciate the frustration involved here and the desire to bring this issue to a wider audience, however posting all this on the forums won't result in action being taken. Why? Because this needs to be reported to our Customer Support department as they are the department that will handle any investigations. The Community Team isn't an alternative route to getting issues resolved or investigated.    To give you an example, this would be like reporting an issue on the forums to Customer Support, their answer would be to direct you to the Community Team.  Same office - different roles and responsibilities (not to mention different systems/tools uses on a daily basis).    Please if you have evidence of something you feel is against our rules. Report this to our Customer Support.  Please note we need the person with all the evidence and who knows what he's talking about to do this.  Making a ticket and saying something like "look here" and just linking a forum thread isn't what's required here.    Whilst I have no doubts there was shenanigans involved in people getting the T22sr, there was also plenty of players who have it legit since the mission changes.  Topics like this are causing unrest in the community and drawing a lot of undue attention and hate on players who didn't break any rules and earned it legit.  Note I AM NOT defending any single player here. I am just pointing out that further aggravation from the community (many of it without evidence to specific players) is making this situation much worse.    TLDR: If you have evidence of cheating in-game, including such things as mission rigging for the T22sr, then please report this to Customer Support who will investigate this.  Accusing someone of cheating just because they have the tank is not something that will be investigated and you shouldn't automatically assume that all players cheated to get this tanks.  Yes sadly some players did cheat to get it, but not all did and it's not fair or right to attack the legit players caught up in the middle of this.  Again this post IS NOT in defence of any one specific player. All I'm asking is that if you have evidence, report it to Customer Support.