Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Delhroh
Fiebre de EXP primaveral
22.03.2019 16:34:08
Subject: Fiebre de EXP primaveral
Link on message: #16750233
Link on message: #16750233
Delhroh: ¿Qué os parece este especial? Vuelve el calor y, con él, ¡la
Fiebre de EXP!
El texto completo de la noticia
El texto completo de la noticia
Delhroh
La historia del Pz.Kpfw. IV en World of Tanks
22.03.2019 16:33:39
Subject: La historia del Pz.Kpfw. IV en World of Tanks
Link on message: #16750231
Link on message: #16750231
Delhroh: ¿Qué os parecen este tipo de artículos históricos? ¡Viajad al
pasado y empapaos a fondo de las variantes del Pz.Kpfw. IV en este
artículo!
El texto completo de la noticia
El texto completo de la noticia
Delhroh
Oferta especial de primavera
22.03.2019 16:32:54
Subject: Oferta especial de primavera
Link on message: #16750227
Link on message: #16750227
Delhroh: ¿Opiniones? 
¡Los árboles
reverdecen, los pájaros cantan y los amantes de los carros de
combate se preparan para una nueva oferta especial!
El texto completo de la noticia
¡Los árboles
reverdecen, los pájaros cantan y los amantes de los carros de
combate se preparan para una nueva oferta especial!El texto completo de la noticia
Delhroh
[HOT TOPIC] Reequilibro de artillerías
22.03.2019 16:32:30
Subject: [HOT TOPIC] Reequilibro de artillerías
Link on message: #16750225
Link on message: #16750225
Delhroh: Saludos, Aquí os dejo un nuevo hilo para opinar, el segundo
hilo caliente de la semana. Te gusten o no... ha llegado el
momento de darle un buen repaso a las AAP,
comandante.
El texto completo de la noticia
El texto completo de la noticia
Delhroh
[HOT TOPIC] LANSEN C, EL VIKINGO
22.03.2019 16:30:56
Subject: [HOT TOPIC] LANSEN C, EL VIKINGO
Link on message: #16750215
Link on message: #16750215
Delhroh: ¡Hora de dar vuestra opinión sobre el LANSEN C! IMPORTANTE: EN
ESTA OCASIÓN DEBIDO A UNA LIMITACIÓN TÉCNICA, NO HAY CÓDIGOS PARA
PROBAR EL LANSEN C. 
.
.Delhroh
Sugerencia carro premium
22.03.2019 16:27:26
Subject: Sugerencia carro premium
Link on message: #16750196
Link on message: #16750196
Delhroh: Básicamente lo mismo que existe en Blitz, ¿no?
thePhilX
Heißt den Frühling mit einem großen Special willkommen
22.03.2019 16:23:01
Subject: Heißt den Frühling mit einem großen Special willkommen
Link on message: #16750176
red_hammer1, on 22 March 2019 - 10:39 AM, said: Frage bezüglich der 10.000 XP für die 4. Wertmarke. Bekomme
ich die 10.000 XP auf dem Panzer, mit dem ich die 4. Wertmarke
erhalte oder mit dem Panzer, den ich spiele NACHDEM ich die 4.
Wertmarke erhalten habe?
Link on message: #16750176
red_hammer1, on 22 March 2019 - 10:39 AM, said: Frage bezüglich der 10.000 XP für die 4. Wertmarke. Bekomme
ich die 10.000 XP auf dem Panzer, mit dem ich die 4. Wertmarke
erhalte oder mit dem Panzer, den ich spiele NACHDEM ich die 4.
Wertmarke erhalten habe?thePhilX: erst die 4. Marke bekommen, dann kriegst du ne Mission, die
dir die Exp bringt für den nächsten Tank
Falathi
Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
22.03.2019 16:20:56
Subject: Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
Link on message: #16750167
exodia_the, on 22 March 2019 - 03:15 PM, said: Falathi a nie mogliście zbalansować artylerii w ten sposób żeby
usunąć jej pociski AP, HEAT i APCR oraz wprowadzić max 3 artylerie
na bitwe? Z jednej strony artyleria nie mogłaby strzelać za 2
tysiące tych ciężko opancerzonych czołgów gdyż burzaki miały zbyt
mało penetracji. Z drugiej strony nadal strzelałaby bardzo rzadko i
byłaby bardzo niecelna.
Link on message: #16750167
exodia_the, on 22 March 2019 - 03:15 PM, said: Falathi a nie mogliście zbalansować artylerii w ten sposób żeby
usunąć jej pociski AP, HEAT i APCR oraz wprowadzić max 3 artylerie
na bitwe? Z jednej strony artyleria nie mogłaby strzelać za 2
tysiące tych ciężko opancerzonych czołgów gdyż burzaki miały zbyt
mało penetracji. Z drugiej strony nadal strzelałaby bardzo rzadko i
byłaby bardzo niecelna. Falathi: Zasadniczo, to właśnie to zrobiliśmy.
Ogłuszenie zostało dodane, by przenieść ciężar działania artylerii z gnębienia pojedynczych czołgów ( zwłaszcza ciężkich ) z wspierania drużyny przez skupianie się na grupach przeciwników, zajmujących tę samą lokację. Poza tym owszem, arta strzelająca rzadko i niecelnie aż tak nie irytuje... ale tylko do momentu, gdy RNG się uśmiechnie i trafi Cię idealnie. A takich strzałów też nie brakowało.
Pozdrawiam!
Ogłuszenie zostało dodane, by przenieść ciężar działania artylerii z gnębienia pojedynczych czołgów ( zwłaszcza ciężkich ) z wspierania drużyny przez skupianie się na grupach przeciwników, zajmujących tę samą lokację. Poza tym owszem, arta strzelająca rzadko i niecelnie aż tak nie irytuje... ale tylko do momentu, gdy RNG się uśmiechnie i trafi Cię idealnie. A takich strzałów też nie brakowało.
Pozdrawiam!
Falathi
Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
22.03.2019 16:03:33
Subject: Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
Link on message: #16750089
Ziewnik, on 22 March 2019 - 02:50 PM, said: Up. Będą bitwy jak podczas wojny secesyjnej. 
Link on message: #16750089
Ziewnik, on 22 March 2019 - 02:50 PM, said: Up. Będą bitwy jak podczas wojny secesyjnej. Falathi: Właściwie to Sherman, Grant, Lee, Jackson już są więc
faktycznie... 
Zapfhan
Neugewichtung der SFL: Veränderung der Betäubungswerte
22.03.2019 16:00:53
Subject: Neugewichtung der SFL: Veränderung der Betäubungswerte
Link on message: #16750067
Geno1isme, on 22 March 2019 - 01:24 PM, said: Das greift zwar teilweise meine eigene Idee eines Immunity-Buffs
auf, allerdings in stark abgeschwächter Form und ist daher mMn eher
ne kosmetische Korrektur was den Stun angeht. Ähnlich die
Balancinganpassungen, 5% weniger Splashradius wird in der Praxis
kaum einen Unterschied machen und wenn überhaupt nur in der
Langzeit-Statistik sichtbar sein. Da wäre eine signifikantere
Überarbeitung wünschenswert gewesen um die einzelnen Arties stärker
voneinander abzugrenzen. Bei der CGC muss man mal sehen ob
das ein Nerf oder doch eher Buff ist: langsamere Granaten brauchen
zwar länger ins Ziel, haben aber dafür auch die höhere/steilere
Flugbahn. Den Nerf vom GW Panther muss man nicht verstehen
wenn gleichzeitg die M44 nicht angefasst wird. Offenbar wurde unter
T7 gar nicht erst über Änderungen nachgedacht. Alles in
allem kein grosser Wurf sondern eher eine Alibi-Änderung.
Link on message: #16750067
Geno1isme, on 22 March 2019 - 01:24 PM, said: Das greift zwar teilweise meine eigene Idee eines Immunity-Buffs
auf, allerdings in stark abgeschwächter Form und ist daher mMn eher
ne kosmetische Korrektur was den Stun angeht. Ähnlich die
Balancinganpassungen, 5% weniger Splashradius wird in der Praxis
kaum einen Unterschied machen und wenn überhaupt nur in der
Langzeit-Statistik sichtbar sein. Da wäre eine signifikantere
Überarbeitung wünschenswert gewesen um die einzelnen Arties stärker
voneinander abzugrenzen. Bei der CGC muss man mal sehen ob
das ein Nerf oder doch eher Buff ist: langsamere Granaten brauchen
zwar länger ins Ziel, haben aber dafür auch die höhere/steilere
Flugbahn. Den Nerf vom GW Panther muss man nicht verstehen
wenn gleichzeitg die M44 nicht angefasst wird. Offenbar wurde unter
T7 gar nicht erst über Änderungen nachgedacht. Alles in
allem kein grosser Wurf sondern eher eine Alibi-Änderung. Zapfhan: Die Änderungen sind ja noch nicht Final und werden in der
Zukunft erst getestet. Bis dahin, kann sich daran noch etwas
ändern.
Delhroh
Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
22.03.2019 16:00:40
Subject: Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
Link on message: #16750066
b0ng0_cat, on 22 March 2019 - 02:40 PM, said: Me sumo a la pregunta
Link on message: #16750066
b0ng0_cat, on 22 March 2019 - 02:40 PM, said: Me sumo a la pregunta Delhroh: Los cupones se pueden conseguir por promociones temporales,
aniversarios de la cuenta... etcétera, y por lo tanto unos
jugadores pueden recibirlos y otros no.
Falathi
Program Rekrutacyjny - Dyskusja ogólna
22.03.2019 15:58:35
Subject: Program Rekrutacyjny - Dyskusja ogólna
Link on message: #16750052
Link on message: #16750052
Falathi: Uwaga, aktualizacja.
Punkty, jak wspominałem wcześniej, są naliczane, tyle, że po stronie gracza tego nie widać.
Problem został zidentyfikowany więc niedługo powinien zostać naprawiony
Punkty, jak wspominałem wcześniej, są naliczane, tyle, że po stronie gracza tego nie widać.
Problem został zidentyfikowany więc niedługo powinien zostać naprawiony
Delhroh
Reequilibrio de las AAP: Cambios en los parámetros del aturdimiento adicional
22.03.2019 15:57:21
Subject: Reequilibrio de las AAP: Cambios en los parámetros del aturdimiento adicional
Link on message: #16750044
birimbao_1, on 22 March 2019 - 01:25 PM, said: Parece una buena noticia, si a eso le sumais una reducción a
dos por batalla lo bordais. PD: No olvideis modificar las
misiones de las artys entonces...
Link on message: #16750044
birimbao_1, on 22 March 2019 - 01:25 PM, said: Parece una buena noticia, si a eso le sumais una reducción a
dos por batalla lo bordais. PD: No olvideis modificar las
misiones de las artys entonces...Delhroh: Hola, Por el momento es pronto para hablar de
ello, dado que los cambios ahora mismo solamente se están
testeando, pero sí, tenemos en mente la posibilidad de cambiar las
misiones personales, si los cambios son aplicados finalmente al
juego.
Falathi
Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
22.03.2019 15:49:21
Subject: Równoważenie dział samobieżnych: Zmiana parametrów ogłuszania
Link on message: #16750001
Link on message: #16750001
Falathi: Co kto lubi.
Sam nie jestem fanem artylerii i jeśli nią gram to praktycznie tylko z uwagi na misje osobiste, które same się nie zrobią. Nie będzie też niespodzianką jeśli powiem, że irytuje mnie to, jak artyleria skupia się na mnie na bitwie i szlag mnie wówczas trafia.
Niemniej, artyleria jest integralną częścią gry i nie zniknie, nie mamy również zamiaru jej usuwać. Oczywiście - teoretycznie, biorąc pod uwagę opinie graczy moglibyśmy ją wywalić, tylko co dalej? Wielu graczom przeszkadzają kołowce, które nawiasem mówiąc są niezłym bacikiem na artę. Pomyślmy... tedeki są wredne, mają mocne działa, chowają się po krzakach. Wywalić. Czołgi ciężkie? Mają pancerz i wygar. Wywalić. Lajty? Wkurzają, spotują, potrafią objechać.
I tak dalej i tak dalej aż na końcu nie będzie niczego.
Tą drogą nie pójdziemy.
Sam nie jestem fanem artylerii i jeśli nią gram to praktycznie tylko z uwagi na misje osobiste, które same się nie zrobią. Nie będzie też niespodzianką jeśli powiem, że irytuje mnie to, jak artyleria skupia się na mnie na bitwie i szlag mnie wówczas trafia.
Niemniej, artyleria jest integralną częścią gry i nie zniknie, nie mamy również zamiaru jej usuwać. Oczywiście - teoretycznie, biorąc pod uwagę opinie graczy moglibyśmy ją wywalić, tylko co dalej? Wielu graczom przeszkadzają kołowce, które nawiasem mówiąc są niezłym bacikiem na artę. Pomyślmy... tedeki są wredne, mają mocne działa, chowają się po krzakach. Wywalić. Czołgi ciężkie? Mają pancerz i wygar. Wywalić. Lajty? Wkurzają, spotują, potrafią objechać.
I tak dalej i tak dalej aż na końcu nie będzie niczego.
Tą drogą nie pójdziemy.
eekeeboo
Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
22.03.2019 15:16:47
Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16749839
kisli, on 22 March 2019 - 01:05 PM, said: Wolf of Odin? Cringe is real.
Link on message: #16749839
kisli, on 22 March 2019 - 01:05 PM, said: Wolf of Odin? Cringe is real.eekeeboo: http://wotreplays.eu...keeboo-lansen_c - Top tier
game so not truly representative, but a lot of fun!
Falathi
Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
22.03.2019 15:04:10
Subject: Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
Link on message: #16749772
Gonzayez_PL, on 22 March 2019 - 12:42 PM, said: Lansen C standardowy i Lansen C - Wilk Odyna to dwa różne
czołgi?
Jak kupię oba zestawy to będę miał dwa czołgi w garażu?
Link on message: #16749772
Gonzayez_PL, on 22 March 2019 - 12:42 PM, said: Lansen C standardowy i Lansen C - Wilk Odyna to dwa różne
czołgi?Jak kupię oba zestawy to będę miał dwa czołgi w garażu?
Falathi: Wilk Odyna to zestaw stylizacyjny. Czołg jest jeden i ten
sam.
eekeeboo
Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
22.03.2019 14:50:46
Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16749695
Miepie, on 22 March 2019 - 12:15 PM, said: Does the Viking skin count as camo, or do we have to apply that
seperately underneath? 
Link on message: #16749695
Miepie, on 22 March 2019 - 12:15 PM, said: Does the Viking skin count as camo, or do we have to apply that
seperately underneath? eekeeboo: It does count as camo, I checked!
eekeeboo
Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
22.03.2019 14:17:18
Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16749511
Gremlin182, on 22 March 2019 - 07:39 AM, said: Little puzzled I thought the new Swedish medium line had a new-ish
mechanic. Yet it appears this premium doesn't have it. Finding that
a little odd will there be another Swedish medium in a few weeks
with it ?
Rjsen, on 22 March 2019 - 08:15 AM, said: is this game getting any other normal tanks? Or has became "World
of Premium Tanks". Every single day means a premium tank release,
wtf is this ? 
Link on message: #16749511
Gremlin182, on 22 March 2019 - 07:39 AM, said: Little puzzled I thought the new Swedish medium line had a new-ish
mechanic. Yet it appears this premium doesn't have it. Finding that
a little odd will there be another Swedish medium in a few weeks
with it ?eekeeboo: The premium does not have the mechanic, the tech tree
version will (so far).
Rjsen, on 22 March 2019 - 08:15 AM, said: is this game getting any other normal tanks? Or has became "World
of Premium Tanks". Every single day means a premium tank release,
wtf is this ? eekeeboo: There are MANY premium tank slots needed to catch up on
normal tech tree tank slots!
Delhroh
Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
22.03.2019 14:02:57
Subject: Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
Link on message: #16749462
Zeben, on 22 March 2019 - 12:43 PM, said: ya que abren un pos de un tanque nuevo podrían los admin poner sus
caracteristicas en un post en su subforo correspondiente si no es
mucho pedir
Link on message: #16749462
Zeben, on 22 March 2019 - 12:43 PM, said: ya que abren un pos de un tanque nuevo podrían los admin poner sus
caracteristicas en un post en su subforo correspondiente si no es
mucho pedir Delhroh: Aquí os dejo unas capturas de pantalla con las características del
tanque. 
eekeeboo
Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
22.03.2019 13:51:34
Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16749432
hipper101, on 22 March 2019 - 06:45 AM, said: So how good/bad is it?
Link on message: #16749432
hipper101, on 22 March 2019 - 06:45 AM, said: So how good/bad is it? eekeeboo: So far I'm enjoying it, I've not had any outstanding games
yet, but still training crew, not equipment and no 6th sense makes
it difficult. But so far it's a safer CDC with a punchier gun at
the expense of the initial aim bloom. Overall I really like the
tank! If people are interested I can just play and
upload the replay and you can make your own judgement!
eekeeboo
Four Tank-Men and a Dog: the Rudy
22.03.2019 13:49:30
Subject: Four Tank-Men and a Dog: the Rudy
Link on message: #16749427
Cmdr_Psycho, on 22 March 2019 - 08:58 AM, said: actually the only relevant question (besides - why is it so
much worse than the t34-85m now.... but that's nothing else than
the t54m1/t44-100/t44/type59 discussions).
but I guess they can't just move a tank to a different tech tree after it was sold once, as people bought it for a specific nation (as the other one wasn't implemented at that point of time). Would be a lot of "but I need it for RU" (even though it's just argued to get more / something for free)
Link on message: #16749427
Cmdr_Psycho, on 22 March 2019 - 08:58 AM, said: actually the only relevant question (besides - why is it so
much worse than the t34-85m now.... but that's nothing else than
the t54m1/t44-100/t44/type59 discussions).but I guess they can't just move a tank to a different tech tree after it was sold once, as people bought it for a specific nation (as the other one wasn't implemented at that point of time). Would be a lot of "but I need it for RU" (even though it's just argued to get more / something for free)
eekeeboo: This would be mostly a legacy feature like the Churchill 3
still in the Russian line, there would be A LOT to consider when/if
it were to move nations.
Delhroh
Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
22.03.2019 13:46:46
Subject: Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
Link on message: #16749414
kebote, on 22 March 2019 - 12:32 PM, said: A ver.....puedes entrenar un tripulante más en el
Lansen....como entrenador sirve. El fuerte de este tanque es la
relación caballos/potencia y la depresión, vamos que puedes coger
posiciones muy rápido, a priori no me parece malo.
Link on message: #16749414
kebote, on 22 March 2019 - 12:32 PM, said: A ver.....puedes entrenar un tripulante más en el
Lansen....como entrenador sirve. El fuerte de este tanque es la
relación caballos/potencia y la depresión, vamos que puedes coger
posiciones muy rápido, a priori no me parece malo.Delhroh: Exacto
eekeeboo
Go Viking with our Lansen C Wallpaper
22.03.2019 13:42:17
Subject: Go Viking with our Lansen C Wallpaper
Link on message: #16749391
Link on message: #16749391
eekeeboo: Everyone is entitled to their opinion, I will say that the Lansen
so far feels to me like a more comfortable CDC that has some slow
gun aim until you get the crew trained and equipment on. Then the
alpha damage is really nice and can bounce more hits than the CDC
can!
eekeeboo
Your maps are bad
22.03.2019 13:26:23
Subject: Your maps are bad
Link on message: #16749349
Link on message: #16749349
eekeeboo: Definite Boop of Nope. Please consider the forum rules
before posting threads like these. Booper-of-Threads
(eek).
Falathi
Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
22.03.2019 13:09:28
Subject: Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
Link on message: #16749306
M4RCIN77, on 22 March 2019 - 10:26 AM, said: No ta masz pecha 
, ja korzystam z nich co zakup
a jeśli to autosugestia, to DZIAŁA! (przez
około 25 bitew, w każdym razie )
Link on message: #16749306
M4RCIN77, on 22 March 2019 - 10:26 AM, said: No ta masz pecha , ja korzystam z nich co zakup
a jeśli to autosugestia, to DZIAŁA! (przez
około 25 bitew, w każdym razie )Falathi: Jeśli placebo działa, to chyba w porządku
Co prawda, na niektórych premkach przez pierwsze bitwy dostawałem łomot aż miło, w miarę niedawny rekord to był LT432 na któym w pewnym momencie miałem 17% WR i jakiś żałosny dmg, choć później udało się to jakoś odrobić.
Co prawda, na niektórych premkach przez pierwsze bitwy dostawałem łomot aż miło, w miarę niedawny rekord to był LT432 na któym w pewnym momencie miałem 17% WR i jakiś żałosny dmg, choć później udało się to jakoś odrobić.
Delhroh
Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
22.03.2019 12:02:41
Subject: Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
Link on message: #16749086
Link on message: #16749086
Delhroh: También lamento comunicar que en esta ocasión no podré distruibuir
códigos de prueba de este vehículo debido a problemas técnicos con
la skin 3D del mismo.
Delhroh
"Honorable", Sugerencias
22.03.2019 11:45:32
Subject: "Honorable", Sugerencias
Link on message: #16749017
Link on message: #16749017
Delhroh: Nombre elegido finalmente: Oficial de información.
Saludos
Delhroh
Cuatro tanquistas y un perro: el Rudy
22.03.2019 11:38:58
Subject: Cuatro tanquistas y un perro: el Rudy
Link on message: #16748989
_P_A_T_O_, on 22 March 2019 - 09:06 AM, said: este tipo de taques a mi me encantan! pero puestos a gastar para mi
humilde opinión creo que es más aconsejable comprar el t34-85M. Muy
buen tanque, genial para realizar unas partidas, genial para
escaramuzas.... son de esas opciones que el dinero está bien
invertido sobre todo si no hay mucho como para ir comprando sin ton
ni son. saludos a todos!! 08:08 Added after 2 minutes Por
cierto, no hay foto para hablar del Lansen C????? porque mira que
me gustaría saber opiniones sobre este tanque porque dudo de
comprarlo o no!!
Link on message: #16748989
_P_A_T_O_, on 22 March 2019 - 09:06 AM, said: este tipo de taques a mi me encantan! pero puestos a gastar para mi
humilde opinión creo que es más aconsejable comprar el t34-85M. Muy
buen tanque, genial para realizar unas partidas, genial para
escaramuzas.... son de esas opciones que el dinero está bien
invertido sobre todo si no hay mucho como para ir comprando sin ton
ni son. saludos a todos!! 08:08 Added after 2 minutes Por
cierto, no hay foto para hablar del Lansen C????? porque mira que
me gustaría saber opiniones sobre este tanque porque dudo de
comprarlo o no!! Delhroh: Por cierto, no hay foto para hablar del Lansen C????? porque mira
que me gustaría saber opiniones sobre este tanque porque dudo de
comprarlo o no!! Aquí tienes la
noticia: https://worldoftanks.eu/es/lansen-c/
parim1331
Historia Pz.Kpfw. IV w World of Tanks
22.03.2019 11:20:52
Subject: Historia Pz.Kpfw. IV w World of Tanks
Link on message: #16748939
adikon01, on 19 March 2019 - 03:18 PM, said: Warto, nie warto. Jak dla mnie Pz.Kpfw. IV Ausf. H
to H na końcu kojarzy się z Haubicą i też jeżdżę z działem z
efektem "bum". Jest papierowy ale dosyć przyjemnie się nim gra. Za
to następca trochę wymięka.
Link on message: #16748939
adikon01, on 19 March 2019 - 03:18 PM, said: Warto, nie warto. Jak dla mnie Pz.Kpfw. IV Ausf. H
to H na końcu kojarzy się z Haubicą i też jeżdżę z działem z
efektem "bum". Jest papierowy ale dosyć przyjemnie się nim gra. Za
to następca trochę wymięka. parim1331: Popieram przedmówcę, PZ IV H potrafi ładnie sypnąć, czasami
nawet za 360 dmg.
Delhroh
Saludad a la primavera con una magnífica oferta especial
22.03.2019 11:11:46
Subject: Saludad a la primavera con una magnífica oferta especial
Link on message: #16748911
falcahud, on 22 March 2019 - 07:16 AM, said: 0 de experiencia por la 4ª ficha, esta vez os habéis pasado con el
ahorro ........... son 10.000, una vez más la 'traducción' de la
noticia al español contiene fallos.
Link on message: #16748911
falcahud, on 22 March 2019 - 07:16 AM, said: 0 de experiencia por la 4ª ficha, esta vez os habéis pasado con el
ahorro ........... son 10.000, una vez más la 'traducción' de la
noticia al español contiene fallos.Delhroh: Correcto, avisao para que lo cambien. Disculpad las
molestias
Delhroh
Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
22.03.2019 11:07:32
Subject: Preguntas/Respuestas del Staff (Especiales, Tienda Premium...)
Link on message: #16748896
K4VR, on 18 March 2019 - 10:07 PM, said: Cuando vuelven las CW?
Link on message: #16748896
K4VR, on 18 March 2019 - 10:07 PM, said: Cuando vuelven las CW? Delhroh: Muy pronto , el 4 de abril.
, el 4 de abril.parim1331
Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
22.03.2019 11:07:00
Subject: Lansen C, Wilk Odyna
Link on message: #16748894
M4RCIN77, on 22 March 2019 - 08:28 AM, said: Pierwsze bitwy obiecujące, ale co do "pancerza" to mi zdecydowanie
przydała się lekcja ostrożności z Progetto - trzeba grać rozważnie,
zagrałem z rana trzy bitwy i udało się robić 2-3k uszkodzeń, ale
może tutaj mieć miejsce premia do rng po zakupie (teoria spiskowa,
ale z racji doświadczenia i obserwacji wierzę w nią...)
Link on message: #16748894
M4RCIN77, on 22 March 2019 - 08:28 AM, said: Pierwsze bitwy obiecujące, ale co do "pancerza" to mi zdecydowanie
przydała się lekcja ostrożności z Progetto - trzeba grać rozważnie,
zagrałem z rana trzy bitwy i udało się robić 2-3k uszkodzeń, ale
może tutaj mieć miejsce premia do rng po zakupie (teoria spiskowa,
ale z racji doświadczenia i obserwacji wierzę w nią...)parim1331: Już któryś to raz słyszę o tych premiach do RNG. Niestety
wygląda na to, że chyba te całe premie musiały mnie jakoś ominąć
Delhroh
Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
22.03.2019 11:05:57
Subject: Lansen C, el Lobo de Odín
Link on message: #16748886
Link on message: #16748886
Delhroh: Saludos, La noticia ya está disponible y hemos ya
solucionado los problemas que habiamos detectado.
Vuelvo a abrir el hilo para que déis opinión sobre el vehículo
Ph3lan
Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
22.03.2019 11:00:32
Subject: Lansen C, the Wolf of Odin
Link on message: #16748872
Link on message: #16748872
Ph3lan: Hey guys, There was a hiccup with the articles and it
seems we have one too many topics for this. Locking this one,
please continue the discussion here
Zapfhan
Stammtisch #9
22.03.2019 00:34:02
Subject: Stammtisch #9
Link on message: #16748170
micflip, on 21 March 2019 - 10:15 PM, said: gib mal Insider Info zu Arty.
Link on message: #16748170
micflip, on 21 March 2019 - 10:15 PM, said: gib mal Insider Info zu Arty.Zapfhan: *Premium Arty 
Zapfhan
Stammtisch #9
22.03.2019 00:11:48
Subject: Stammtisch #9
Link on message: #16748125
Getaro, on 21 March 2019 - 10:01 PM, said: Wenn das der NMeckerhan sieht !
Link on message: #16748125
Getaro, on 21 March 2019 - 10:01 PM, said: Wenn das der NMeckerhan sieht !Zapfhan: ftfy
eekeeboo
Updates to the Wargaming Game Center
21.03.2019 20:47:39
Subject: Updates to the Wargaming Game Center
Link on message: #16747632
Link on message: #16747632
eekeeboo: The public test is over as the patch has now been deployed and live
on the server.
eekeeboo
Update 1.4.1 General feedback
21.03.2019 20:44:38
Subject: Update 1.4.1 General feedback
Link on message: #16747623
Flint_74, on 21 March 2019 - 04:59 PM, said: Well done, not only do you quote someone else's comment in
replying to my post and apparently mis-attribute Srele007's post
from page 4 of this thread to me, but you also then try to put
words in MY mouth by thoroughly and deliberately MISQUOTING what I
actually asked. Congratulations on reaching a new unprofessional
low... You know, maybe if you'd actually gotten off your
high horse for just a second and bothered to read and understand
what I ACTUALLY WROTE you would have seen that I categorically DID
NOT ask WG to stop advertising their products in-game. I absolutely
do understand that this is a free-to-play game and that this is how
WG make most/all of their money, and that's perfectly fine, instead
all I did was quite reasonably ask if the playerbase could have an
option in the games settings to disable the incessant and
thoroughly distracting marketing (a.k.a. intelligence) pop-ups that
appear in the garage, because contrary to what you and WG might
want to believe, not everyone that plays WoT is interested in
spending money on this game, and thus fairly presumably not
everyone wants to see a never-ending stream of mostly redundant and
largely intrusive adverts flashing up on-screen when they're just
trying to play the game and have a little bit of fun while doing
that. So look, with the greatest of respect, if WG aren't
going to provide such a basic option, that's completely fine too,
but at least have the common courtesy to answer the damned question
in even a semi-professional manner, even if the answer is 'no',
instead of bringing the unnecessarily defensive attitude, because
that just reflects poorly, not only on you personally as a member
of WG Staff, but on WG as a whole. And as for the
matchmaking thing, I literally haven't demanded anything, and I
also haven't asked WG to give into anything, or for them to
immediately give the playerbase anything "now", unless asking a
perfectly fair and legitimate question is somehow now considered
making a demand around here? But surely WG aren't so sensitive as
to mistake a fair question for a demand, are they? Instead
I, and rather a lot of people around here apparently, would simply
like to see some actual progress being made to finally resolve the
matchmaking issue, even if that progress comes in the form of much
more regular progress updates being posted, e.g. once a month
instead of once per quarter/once per half year as we've been
getting. And yes WG might well have staffing issues, and scheduling
issues, and all kinds of other internal financial, time, and
manpower issues, that have all conspired to slow down the attempts
to fix the the matchmaking problem, but, once again, this has been
ongoing for the best part of almost two years now, so if the people
in charge of WG can't figure out within that extended timeframe to
simply hire more staff, and/or to make whatever other necessary
changes are required to get such a serious problem affecting their
premier game fixed, then that just reflects poorly on the
decision-making processes within WG. Oh, and one final
thing, I've seen and heard the whole "you don't speak for the
playerbase/community" argument being used before, many times in
fact, I've even seen it dressed up in all kinds of ways too, and
frankly it's tired and it simply doesn't wash anymore, because
bitter experience has repeatedly shown that it smacks of a games
developer/community mangement team living in denial, so by all
means WG absolutely should feel free to brush off individual
players concerns about the state of things as being not
representative, and instead WG should feel free to bury their head
in the sand and ignore what's going on regarding the continuing
valid concerns of this games playerbase if they want to, but WG
should absolutely do all of that entirely at their own peril.
At this point I'll just presume we won't get an option to
disable the pop-ups, and that the disabled team damage thing will
happen when it happens, and that the matchmaking problems will
hopefully be resolved 'soon™'. Thank you for your time.
Geno1isme, on 21 March 2019 - 05:45 PM, said: To be clear: WIth "you" I usually mean WG, not you personally.
I'm fully aware that you're just doing your job by defending the
company policies (though you have a very defensive style even for
WG staff) and can't really do anything about it. Partially
this grudge also comes because we don't really have unofficial
information channels anymore as you closed basically all the leaks
for TBD, TAP and RSR, so we're pretty much stuck with whatever bits
of intel you guys can release. Unfortunately for you that also
means that we will bug you constantly and every word from you and
every picture in articles will now be analyzed to
death What would have been nice
after the WG Fest announcement is something like Scheduled for Q1:
special ammo testing phase 1, frontline return, wheeled vehicles,
multithreading Planned for Q2: bond tanks stage 1, ranked battles
season 3, CW season 11, special ammo testing phase 2 Planned for
Q3: swedish mediums, new premium account, bond tanks stage 2, MM
rework Planned for Q4: ranked battles season 4, CW season 12,
special ammo rework And not just be informed one or two
weeks before things actually go live. And yeah, secrecy is common
(not only) in the gaming industry. Doesn't mean we have to like it.
It's just even more frustrating with live services.
Saar_Lion, on 21 March 2019 - 05:53 PM, said: I haven't played since this "representative" had me banned
from the forum for 14 days for helping him make himself look
condescending, stupid and useless at his "job".
Hope the powers that be don't miss my money and sack him...
that would be awful
Link on message: #16747623
Flint_74, on 21 March 2019 - 04:59 PM, said: Well done, not only do you quote someone else's comment in
replying to my post and apparently mis-attribute Srele007's post
from page 4 of this thread to me, but you also then try to put
words in MY mouth by thoroughly and deliberately MISQUOTING what I
actually asked. Congratulations on reaching a new unprofessional
low... You know, maybe if you'd actually gotten off your
high horse for just a second and bothered to read and understand
what I ACTUALLY WROTE you would have seen that I categorically DID
NOT ask WG to stop advertising their products in-game. I absolutely
do understand that this is a free-to-play game and that this is how
WG make most/all of their money, and that's perfectly fine, instead
all I did was quite reasonably ask if the playerbase could have an
option in the games settings to disable the incessant and
thoroughly distracting marketing (a.k.a. intelligence) pop-ups that
appear in the garage, because contrary to what you and WG might
want to believe, not everyone that plays WoT is interested in
spending money on this game, and thus fairly presumably not
everyone wants to see a never-ending stream of mostly redundant and
largely intrusive adverts flashing up on-screen when they're just
trying to play the game and have a little bit of fun while doing
that. So look, with the greatest of respect, if WG aren't
going to provide such a basic option, that's completely fine too,
but at least have the common courtesy to answer the damned question
in even a semi-professional manner, even if the answer is 'no',
instead of bringing the unnecessarily defensive attitude, because
that just reflects poorly, not only on you personally as a member
of WG Staff, but on WG as a whole. And as for the
matchmaking thing, I literally haven't demanded anything, and I
also haven't asked WG to give into anything, or for them to
immediately give the playerbase anything "now", unless asking a
perfectly fair and legitimate question is somehow now considered
making a demand around here? But surely WG aren't so sensitive as
to mistake a fair question for a demand, are they? Instead
I, and rather a lot of people around here apparently, would simply
like to see some actual progress being made to finally resolve the
matchmaking issue, even if that progress comes in the form of much
more regular progress updates being posted, e.g. once a month
instead of once per quarter/once per half year as we've been
getting. And yes WG might well have staffing issues, and scheduling
issues, and all kinds of other internal financial, time, and
manpower issues, that have all conspired to slow down the attempts
to fix the the matchmaking problem, but, once again, this has been
ongoing for the best part of almost two years now, so if the people
in charge of WG can't figure out within that extended timeframe to
simply hire more staff, and/or to make whatever other necessary
changes are required to get such a serious problem affecting their
premier game fixed, then that just reflects poorly on the
decision-making processes within WG. Oh, and one final
thing, I've seen and heard the whole "you don't speak for the
playerbase/community" argument being used before, many times in
fact, I've even seen it dressed up in all kinds of ways too, and
frankly it's tired and it simply doesn't wash anymore, because
bitter experience has repeatedly shown that it smacks of a games
developer/community mangement team living in denial, so by all
means WG absolutely should feel free to brush off individual
players concerns about the state of things as being not
representative, and instead WG should feel free to bury their head
in the sand and ignore what's going on regarding the continuing
valid concerns of this games playerbase if they want to, but WG
should absolutely do all of that entirely at their own peril.
At this point I'll just presume we won't get an option to
disable the pop-ups, and that the disabled team damage thing will
happen when it happens, and that the matchmaking problems will
hopefully be resolved 'soon™'. Thank you for your time.
eekeeboo: If you say: "who was demanding anything?" and you
claim to speak on behalf of the "playerbase" then i will reference
the player base. If you do not like this, please consider not
speaking on behalf of the whole player base. I am answering
the questions you ask, that is simply it. And I am not
on a high horse, I am once again answering your questions. Please
feel free to re-read them. You might not be interested
in spending money on the game, that's your choice, but a game is
interested in getting as many people as possible to spend money,
that's how the business works specially a F2P title.
You are entitled to play the game completely for free, that does
not mean you are entitled to demand better and more features as
someone who has no interest in supporting the game. You support
those who pay bills, not those who give you higher bills.
You say you speak for the community and from what you said
you take the time and effort away from those who pay and make
claims on their behalf. If you take the time to read all of the
comments from the community, not just those that align with your
own opinions, I believe you will be in for a surprise on your
remarks.
Geno1isme, on 21 March 2019 - 05:45 PM, said: To be clear: WIth "you" I usually mean WG, not you personally.
I'm fully aware that you're just doing your job by defending the
company policies (though you have a very defensive style even for
WG staff) and can't really do anything about it. Partially
this grudge also comes because we don't really have unofficial
information channels anymore as you closed basically all the leaks
for TBD, TAP and RSR, so we're pretty much stuck with whatever bits
of intel you guys can release. Unfortunately for you that also
means that we will bug you constantly and every word from you and
every picture in articles will now be analyzed to
death What would have been nice
after the WG Fest announcement is something like Scheduled for Q1:
special ammo testing phase 1, frontline return, wheeled vehicles,
multithreading Planned for Q2: bond tanks stage 1, ranked battles
season 3, CW season 11, special ammo testing phase 2 Planned for
Q3: swedish mediums, new premium account, bond tanks stage 2, MM
rework Planned for Q4: ranked battles season 4, CW season 12,
special ammo rework And not just be informed one or two
weeks before things actually go live. And yeah, secrecy is common
(not only) in the gaming industry. Doesn't mean we have to like it.
It's just even more frustrating with live services.eekeeboo: It can appear defensive when it simply matters of fact. I
always mention and repeat I give facts and info as they are, I want
people to be informed and understand the reasons for choices and
circumstances and if things will not change for reasons I can't
share, they need to understand at the least things are that way for
a reason. I'm always happy to be bugged for more
information and we are working on being more forthright with things
like the ST leak and news/updates, we share more information with
CCs directly more than ever who also have embargos and deadlines
etc. This is so that all the information that comes out, is correct
and not misleading (highlighting my first point). The
reason you don't get such a break down is for a multitude of
reasons, but because plans change, and if we said that, people
would have high hopes and say "you broke..." You can preface
with... rough plan, but still people will ignore it. Some things
end up being moved back or not coming at all or even changed
completely, developers will make claims they can stick to 90+% of
the time for those reasons and will pass on info to share when it's
ready so no false promises or issues arise from it.
And I get secrecy isn't as nice as transparency, but not everyone
is reasonable with transparency and good intentions, many people
see plans as concrete timetables and even more don't understand how
literally 24 hours before going live things can be cancelled or
break. 18:45 Added after 0 minutes
Saar_Lion, on 21 March 2019 - 05:53 PM, said: I haven't played since this "representative" had me banned
from the forum for 14 days for helping him make himself look
condescending, stupid and useless at his "job".
Hope the powers that be don't miss my money and sack him...
that would be awfuleekeeboo: I wish you luck in your future, if you don't want to be
banned, please follow the rules. Thank-you.
eekeeboo
Update 1.4.1 Bug Reports
21.03.2019 20:34:02
Subject: Update 1.4.1 Bug Reports
Link on message: #16747597
TYTJEN, on 21 March 2019 - 05:16 PM, said: Game keeps crashing after update
Link on message: #16747597
TYTJEN, on 21 March 2019 - 05:16 PM, said: Game keeps crashing after updateeekeeboo: Can you please run a WG check and submit a ticket for help
if you haven't already done so?
eekeeboo
Do we really need the chat ban
21.03.2019 20:31:54
Subject: Do we really need the chat ban
Link on message: #16747594
Link on message: #16747594
eekeeboo: There's no point in having rules if there's no consequence to
breaking them. So yes, the chat ban is, unfortunately, a necessary
evil for those who are unable to control certain frustration
causing urges.
Реклама | Adv