Developers posts on forum

ApocalipticSnowflake: Mówiłeś że Wargaming został wyrzucony z turniejów.  Chciałbym od ciebie uzyskać dowody bo póki co mówisz o sytuacji która nie miała miejsca, a potem mówisz o sytuacji z bitew losowych która nic nie ma wspólnego z turniejami. Tak więc proszę Cię przedstaw mi dowody że to co napisałeś nie jest okłamywaniem użytkowników forum. Co do turniejów to przez lata się odbywały, aż do 2018 roku. Wiele osób z tych turniejów żyło i wszyscy Ci którzy grali na takim poziomie są zadowoleni że turniej takiego kalibru powrócił do gry po 3 latach przerwy. Co ma MM do turnieju w którym się wybiera pojazdy?  Co do bitew 15:0 jest bardzo ładny wątek założony przez Knurzego na naszym Polskim Forum który zdecydowanie polecam odwiedzić. 

ApocalipticSnowflake: Zdecydowanie. Mantykora to aktualnie mój ulubiony czołg na X tierze. No może oprócz Bat Chata 25t którego kocham od lat.   

ApocalipticSnowflake: Czy mógłbyś podeprzeć ten argument jakimkolwiek dowodem?  

ApocalipticSnowflake: Popieram twój zapał bo osobiście uwielbiam oglądać turnieje. 

ApocalipticSnowflake: I to bardzo zacna. 130 tysięcy euro jako pula nagród w fazie pucharowej 

Keyhand:  Andersrum, die Schlammschlacht hat die Feldpost übernommen und inkorporiert.Daddy Domstadt mit der feindlichen Übernahme.

ApocalipticSnowflake: Wszystkie propozycje mają szansę na bycie wprowadzonymi.  Nie mówię że to się stanie ale szansa aby to się stało zawsze istnieje. W każdym razie przekazałem tę informację.

ApocalipticSnowflake: Nie ma problemu.  Co do botów to poganiam. To zostało zgłoszone i jest dalej rozwiązywane. 

Zapfhan:  Um mal die genannten Punkte anzusprechen 

Zapfhan:  Natürlich wird Feedback auf allen Kanälen gewertet. Es sollte aber auch klar sein, dass ein Dislike 2 Minuten nach erscheinen eines Videos nicht die gleiche Aussagekraft hat wie z.b. ein längerer Kommentar hier im Forum bei dem eben mehr geschrieben und erklärt wird.  Instruktoren sind schon mit einem Seltenheitswert verbunden und sollten auch bestehenden Crews/Kommandanten einen gewissen Wert im etwaigen neuen System geben. Daraus aber darauf zu kommen, dass wir möchten, dass ihr gar keine habt sehe ich irgendwie nicht. Eine Umwandlung wird es geben, nur nicht bei Release (wenn denn), da man allen ermöglichen will ihre Crews ins neue System zu tauschen. Da noch nicht fest steht ob/wann Crew 2.0 kommt, gibt es für das Umwandeln auch noch kein Datum.      

Zapfhan:  Würde ich dir auch nicht zum Vorwurf machen 

Zapfhan:  Könntest du mir da bitten ein Screenshot zukommen lassen, dass dies nicht bei dir zur Verfügung steht? 

Zapfhan:  

Zapfhan:  Wird gemacht. 

Zapfhan:  Es gibt ja nicht nur einen Geburtstag zu feiern und daher wird nicht an jedem alles abgefeuert    

Zapfhan:  Da der T-44-100 aus einer Herausforderung kommt, wie der WZ, Pilot oder auch der WZ-111 noch daran festgemacht. 

Actinid:
Il y a des récompenses pour les deux équipes. Tu as plus d'informations ici

Actinid:    

Zapfhan:  Hoi, könntest du schauen, ob das nach dem erneuten Login noch immer der Fall ist? 

HeatResistantBFG:  That's a big if though, and I would point out there is nothing to back that this would happen. And I have nothing to suggest that anything majoritively disliked would make it live

ApocalipticSnowflake:  Nawet jak tego nie napiszę to jest to dalej prawdą.  Wszystkie wątki w Wiadomościach czytam na bieżąco. Jest wiele planów co do najróżniejszych rzeczy które są w trakcie development-u. I mało co mógłbym nazwać "oderwanym od rzeczywistości". 

HeatResistantBFG:   British lights perform well, and are actually even meta in clan wars, not exactly the postcard definition of garbage. They serve a niche role and are the best at doing it, you may not like playing them but you also don't have to, doesn't make the garbage or broken. Very few people I have seen dislike equipment 2.0 now, in fact, several people who said they dislike it now like it and admit most of their issues were baseless upon reflection. So again this feels like an "I don't like it" again, and not an objective reality. Which of course, it's more than okay for you to not like something, but trying to say it was the "en masse" feeling is not accurate. Ah, good timing, someone was just saying that they wished we released numbers and almost on queue here we are so thanks for that. But yeah, that 70% came from more than 70k people who took part in the sandbox, I've gone through the results myself, they're real, and considering how much of even the forum is positive about them these days, this seems like another "I don't like" opposed to you being a voice for the majority.   Also worth noting you left out ammo rework, overmatch rework and I think there were 1 or two others I can't remember (before my time) that went to the sandbox and got rejected by the community and then have gone away, I mean even crew 2.0 is an example of that so far, people didn't like it, we took it away, reworked some of it, brought it back to sandbox, and now a decision will be made based upon feedback, like every time. It won't be based on JUST your feedback though, it'll be based on everyone's, even though who disagree with you, which so far seems to be a majority on any of the things that made it to the game.   And with the numbers on that site, do you notice a trend at all? Perhaps that every summer people seem to play less, and every winter they play more? And that perhaps during a hotter than normal summer as covid restrictions lift after nearly 2 years not allowed out much people may just want to go outside, I know I have been enjoying going out and walks in the parks of Prague with my girlfriend and it can be reflected in my games played dropping a bit, but chances are as it drops below 0 again in winter I'll be inside a lot more playing more. Honestly, no idea how real those numbers are, but there is an obvious trend that goes against what you're saying again in your own "evidence",    If you wish to stop playing then do so, no one should force you and you definitely shouldn't feel forced to play, spend or don't spend, just play if you want to. It's as simple as that  Hamsterkicker Reply

HeatResistantBFG:   Special crews become instructors, their XP is used across the whole crew to create a new crew. So you lose nothing and get an equivalent crew + an instructor for each special crew member (aka if you have 3 special crew members in a batchat, you get 1 crew at the end and 3 instructors ) IIRC there is a special fury crew, but it's the one with the free BIA perk for all members and not the wardaddy, although wardaddy will become an instructor as well  sdxsdx Reply

HeatResistantBFG:   From my understanding, the issues are a combination of the crew system we have being old, overcomplicated and a big hurdle for new players. The ideal is to find a system that will alleviate these problems while not pushing away existing players, obviously, that balance will be a hard one to find and is exactly why the sandbox server exists  

HeatResistantBFG:   Sandbox isn't exclusively in English, often bits are only in Russian in fact, but peoples reason for taking part and not taking part aren't something I was guessing at But i would point out my experience of people with feedback who haven't tried it (positive or negative) is only within the EN language, so would sort of go against that reasoning, leaving EN feedback but not trying something because of your EN abilities sorta clashes. Not dismissing the reason, just saying that anything i could/would refer to seems unlikely to fall under that   If you spot translation errors (live, CT or sandbox), please inform a CM in dm (for none main supported languages, then EN (myself and Dwigt) as these things do slip through and obviously we want to correct them.   No one said there is an assumption people like it because people say nothing, the QnA points out that the most motivated to leave feedback are people with a negative opinion, which is true, but it doesn't mean we look at hugely negative feedback and say "meh, others will be fine with it who just didn't speak up". It was simply stated as a reality of feedback and a hurdle that has to be overcome to ensure players overall like updates/changes.   In terms of numbers, we do release real numbers, and people say they are fake, then say things like "give us the real numbers", well if you didn't believe them the first time if I type them again will they be believed more? the 70% meme, for example, myself and dwigt were commenting with the numbers, it was from over 70k survey results. Survey results have not nor never will have some sort of "silent player" thought in them, it would defeat the whole point of a survey. Only real numbers are shown, no silent aspects have ever been taken into account, but as long as they don't agree with some people those people will reject it.   Psticide Reply

HeatResistantBFG:   Well, our thoughts are shared, discussed and confirmed with other CMs and also often the product team involved in the process of the feature, so the collective battle count is in the 6 figures. Also, as is often shown, a battle count rarely has much implication on game knowledge/understanding, nor is an experience required to understand something. Personally, I have 2.5k on EU, 1.5k on NA and around 20-30k+ on console and have generally been following/watching WoT since the first video I watched of a small YouTubers video about the Jagdtiger (he goes by mighty gnome overlord now, how times change). So perhaps i know and understand a bit more than you give credit   And I have bought all the free bia/perk/skill crews I could since joining the team, and I have ground many of them out to 4 or more perks since and I don't see how any of them lose value in 2.0? I get both the crew and the instructors and if I want their voiceovers I just need to tick a box.   On a blunt and simple level though, I don't need to have done something to understand the issues/cost behind it, especially not when my job is to gather feedback on it. My job is to take your issues and concerns and pass them on, not to project my own in their place. I've never been a F2P player, but I will consider the issues to them and the issues raised by those players, I have never been many different aspects of players but it has no impact on my willingness to gather their feedback and try to ensure their best interests are represented in our feedback.  valiqa Reply

HeatResistantBFG:   Personally, I like the idea of more RPG style commanders, people complain about crew skills not offering diversity and choice... well here it is   But perhaps with some changed/maybe less of them people will be more comfortable with them? Or perhaps not, that's why we run these tests "turns decent 4 skill crew to trash" is just not true, it would be stronger than before, like not even questionably really. Realistically your first 2 are some form of repairs/camo and BIA, then some tanks need both repairs + camo so that could easily take up your first 3, and you had to train 6th sense so on a crew with a shared commander/radioman you have not got 2 from bia, recon, repairs, 6th sense, situational awareness, you can have all of those and them actually be stronger + more within the same xp requirements, then add on instructors allowing you to have even more trained and maybe having 1 talent activated as well. If you're being honest, would you rather take a crew with no 6th sense but say 2-3 perks or a crew with just 1 perk but one be 6th sense? I know I'd much rather have 6th sense as ability would allow me to reduce the gap created by skills but having 6th sense is a universal benefit regardless of skill. I'd say this is sort of the same point as the first, but also that it was exactly the idea of crew 2.0, the idea was to have a crew system where you get "less" skill you can choose but they are more impactful and they can allow the crew choices to be different but still impactful.  This sort of thing can be balanced, but there will always be "extreme" builds to some extent that are usually relatively poor meta builds but funny to see. The CC 06Wallst (Honest Gaming) is known for this sorta thing, from his ELC crouching tiger, hidden bush or the ramming escapades. But yeah, balance is obviously something that can be worked on Something we will be emphasising in our feedback So that's not actually how it works on WoWs, I've seen the video where this claim was made and the person doesn't understand WoWs crews unfortunately so I can understand how they misunderstood. Firstly the crews in those bundles represent at most a couple k gold, the main additional values are their equivalent of boosters as well as gold and prem time and often limited-edition emblem essentially (a flag you only get if you purchase that top bundle). So first of all selling those bundles with additional content already happens and has always been a thing, most offers will have a base, extra and "extra extra" style bundle and here on WoT sometimes there is a BIA/skilled perk crew involved. Then second of all, the claim in that vid is that "like ships" we would sell high-level commanders, but this is where another misunderstanding is shown, a 10 point (out of 21) point commander on warships is about 6% of the total XP required for that 21 and is a total of around 180k xp, similar to that of a single perk in the current WoT. This actually makes the free BIA perk crews stronger than the WoWs similar style, as the BIA counts as 0 xp on the crew and so the 2nd perk you earn is now valued at the 1st and so on, whereas ships they still have to earn XP after at a normal rate. So the TLDR is nothing has changed, now will it, and I spoke to the product team about the claim that we would sell high level/point (or even max level) commanders and they had this to say "We have no such plans and it is extremely unlikely that it would ever happen", so hope that helps with that . Technically not pay to win as you can do it for free too, it is certainly a large scale extension of pay to progress through, and an extension of what is currently possible in the game (using gold to silver, and silver to crew books to max out a crew), and of course they need free XP so you would have to have the XP spare to do it. But it is certainly another thing we will be highlighting in our feedback   It may be a lot harder to introduce stuff without crew 2.0 than you realise, I have some limited experience with some of our backend systems around crews and honestly, there was no way i could see for a free 6th sense to exist in the way you may think. It would take a total rewrite/rework, such as crew 2.0, to achieve this. There is also a lot more positives than those 2 to crew 2.0 such as crews not needing more/less members for use in a dif tank, no need to retrain a role when moving tank, the ability to share a crew across different tech tree tanks, skills are simpler to use (no more confusion over does a skill work before fully trained or does a skill work if you have 2 loaders and 1 had it, etc etc) to name a few. Does it mean it's perfect, of course not That's why we want feedback on what people dislike and like, so we can make something that is just "better" than what exists currently.  

HeatResistantBFG:  HERE is a link on how to do a WG Check Let me know how it goes, and feel free to send myself and/or Dwigt the ticket ID if you feel it needs checking in on 

HeatResistantBFG:  So this was posted by a RU blog, and is said to be from a QnA with some dev staff and supertesters, Dwigt posted an updated/official reply to it HERE if you want more context  TLDR to that bit, he is talking about the CIS forums, no we don't only use polls and yes often people who are positive don't leave feedback, that's human nature and applies everywhere, and yes a lot of people who dislike aspects/the whole thing have never even played it. On the last one, that doesn't mean their feedback is ignored, myself and dwigt (for en and the CCs) go through all your feedback regardless of whether you have played it or not and we provide it up the chain. Also, we do not count someone saying 1 nice 4 bad as positive as you are making out, such a comment could be negative or mixed, depending on the contents.  I like this, hate 4 things = negative I LOVE this thing, I'm not a big fan of these 4 things but meh = mixed

Obviously, this isn't an exact scoring system, we use common sense and personal judgement but it's honestly pretty irrelevant to the feedback we gather as we will be largely reporting on the feedback itself, aka the thing you hate or like. The overall sentiment is often a much more complicated thing.  

HeatResistantBFG: Server has been updated to CT3

HeatResistantBFG:  Updated to CT3

HeatResistantBFG:  You should never feel you have to buy a premium tank, they are there if you want  

HeatResistantBFG:  Embrace the TOG, become the TOG, Insert Deep and Meaningful quote here  i always enjoy playing it, just a tank to have fun in and not take anything to serious  

HeatResistantBFG:  Think you may have been a bit selective in what you read

HeatResistantBFG:  Good and beautiful comment  There is nothing wrong with someone wanting a tank, I'm sure we all have bought something because we like it not because we think it is good

HeatResistantBFG:  Well, tank wars is just a fun and simple way to give players more free stuff   In terms of the RU thing you linked, from my understanding that is a Russian history blog and the RU site are simply linking it and displaying some of the info, it's not a WG initiative. But agree more historical content is always nice!

HeatResistantBFG:  

HeatResistantBFG:  I played it a couple of months ago while going up the none wheeled french lights and enjoyed it, it obviously doesn't play as it used to but it also doesn't see as high tier and is still very effective. It's still one of the best passive lights at it's tier  

HeatResistantBFG:  There is still more stuff happening with the event  
 Such as these things AMX ELC bis: https://challenge-eu...net/challenge/6
M24 Chaffee: https://challenge-eu...net/challenge/8  

HeatResistantBFG:  What time was this at? is it possible you were playing during the previous time period maxed out on points and then the later games were after the reset time? And have you submitted a support ticket about this?

HeatResistantBFG:
But I understand, no one really cares until sCrew 2.0 comes trough and they try pushing even worse things than that only to release wot 2.0 after that and try to sell you all the premium tanks you owned in wot 1.0 again.   How can you have a 'game' be this inconsistent with loading times / conditions without making it look like you're fiddling with players / teams on purpose?  Have you submitted a ticket or anything? and if so can you send me the ticket ID, if not please do and provide them with things like a WG Check and python logs

thePhilX: (mimimi)   Die Planung von Haaky und Isegal ist aber definitiv einen Applaus wert.  hab das mal für dich visualisiert: 

ApocalipticSnowflake: Nawet amunicję premium przyjmuje dość dobrze jako że posiada pancerz warstwowy. Szczególnie Heaty mają problemy z przebijaniem. Mój pierwszy czołg premium w grze. Ostatnio wróciłem nim do grania aby wbić 3MoE. Po wszelkich buffach do penetracji na pociskach standardowych którymi zazwyczaj gram bardzo przyjemny do grania. 

ApocalipticSnowflake: Nie obrażaj mi senlac-a bo to akurat był czołg którego kupiłem jako że mi go brakowało. Bardzo lubię brytyjskie czołgi lekkie bo dają mi najwięcej zabawy z gry. 

ApocalipticSnowflake:  Zgłosiłem to w dniu gdy oferta wyszła do sklepu niestety nie było już czasu aby dodać styl do sprzedaży. Mogę za to potwierdzić że będzie do kupienia w przyszłości. 

ApocalipticSnowflake: Całe to wideo ma za zadanie pomóc nowym graczom, tak więc trzeba o tym pamiętać. Tak na prawdę jest to odświeżenie wideo sprzed 3 lat aby dodać nowe informacje oraz wyświetlać grę w sposób aktualny a nie sprzed aktualizacji 1.0. 

ApocalipticSnowflake: To są wymagania Gleam, a nie nasze.  

ApocalipticSnowflake: Ja osobiście polecam Windows+Shift+S.  Oprócz tego tak jak jeden użytkownik wspomniał wcześniej dobrą informację zrzuty się zapisują automatycznie w folderze z grą. Zrzut ekranu można zamieścić poprzez kliknięcie na dole "+1" przy informacji o zrzucie ekranu, a tam pojawi się opcja "wyślij plik" należy wrzucić zrzut ekranu swojej służby bojowej i jesteście wtedy dodani jako uczestnik konkursu.

Keyhand:
Zum Thema einzelne Panzer ist kein Tutorialvideo geplant, zudem ist der Content auf den du Verweist, eher im Endgame anzusiedeln.
Ein Neueinsteiger wird vor seinem ersten Gefecht, worum es in diesem Video geht, keinem Tier X gegenüberstehen.Falls du jedoch tatsächlich daran interessiert bist, wie diese Panzer am effektivsten bekämpft werden können bist du herzlich eingeladen, auf dem deutschsprachigen WoT-Stream vorbeizuschauen wo ich gerne alle Fragen beantworte.
Link in meiner Signatur
 

Keyhand:   Ist in der Mache

Kabazabak: Исправление коснулось не только уникальных пилотов. В некоторых случаях модификатор от обычного оборудования или пилота применялся дважды при отображении характеристики в ангаре.

Keyhand: Aber sicher

ApocalipticSnowflake: Mój błąd w trakcie przenoszenia. Teraz powinien być widoczny. 

Kabazabak:   Цифры уменьшились в результате исправления ошибки, которая приводила к завышенному отображению некоторых параметров в ангаре при применении модификаторов от оборудования и умений пилотов. Теперь в ангаре некоторые цифры могли стать меньше. На характеристиках самолёта в бою это никак не отразилось, там эти параметры обсчитывались корректно и поэтому никаких изменений не проводилось. Спасибо за бдительность!

Keyhand:  Als Außenstehender bist du hierbei natürlich mit einer objektiven Perspektive im Vorteil, das CW-Leben in der Kampagne in Topclans ist ein Ponyhof, das Miteinander stets von gegenseitigem Respekt geprägt. 

Keyhand:  Danke dir - ja es macht nen Unterschied ob man sich im Streamingstuhl rumlümmelt oder aufrecht mit komplettem Lungenvolumen etwas einspricht