Developers posts on forum

Subject: [Piaskownica] Testy nowego balansu ruszają 10 lutego
Link on message: #17604494

Konrad6123, on 11 February 2020 - 05:28 PM, said:   Rebalans goldów jest jak najbardziej na miejscu, ale po co mieszanie w odłamkowych? Ruszacie coś co działa, sam nie znoszę gold spamu i rozumiem że chcecie z tym walczyć, ale to trzeba zabrać się za pociski specjalne a nie hp, odłamkowe i resztę niepowiązanych rzeczy.   Nie oczekuję że się ze mną zgodzisz bo jako community manager musisz się zgadzać z wolą statku matki, ale faktem jest że te zmiany są pozbawione logiki. Niech zostaną na piaskownicy.

Subject: [Sandbox] Der Test der Neuen Balance startet am 10. Februar
Link on message: #17604469

BernddasBrot99, on 11 February 2020 - 04:12 PM, said:   Bist du auf dem Testserver ? und nicht auf der Sandbox  16:15 Added after 3 minute Warum gibt es kein Gold oder free XP um die neuen Panzer im techtree zu testen?


Voll_die_Seuche, on 11 February 2020 - 04:24 PM, said: Warum sperren die auf dem Sandbox die Team-Übung? 

Subject: The Black Market is Back!
Link on message: #17604427

Echotun, on 11 February 2020 - 05:24 PM, said:
Any chance you can confirm when BM ends?

Subject: [Piaskownica] Testy nowego balansu ruszają 10 lutego
Link on message: #17604410

Konrad6123, on 11 February 2020 - 05:15 PM, said: Przykro mi Parim że jesteś w takiej sytuacji, ciężko jest bronić zdania które jest absolutnie pozbawione logiki.   Cały ten rebalans to jedna wielka pomyłka, NIKT nie miał problemu z "przejrzystością" drzewka, NIKT nie miał problemu z HP pojazdów na X tierach. Psujecie coś co już działa.   JEDYNE co trzeba było zrobić to zmniejszyć różnicę hp na tierach IV-VI i znefirć goldy. WG stworzyło problem i "ambitnie" naprawia go kosztem wszystkich graczy.   Wiem że nie mam całego obrazu sytuacji, ale jako gracz od bety nie podoba mi się ŻADNA zmiana którą ten test reprezentuje. Mam wielką nadzieję że społeczność powie jednogłośne "nie", a WG zacznie słuchać.

Subject: The Black Market is Back!
Link on message: #17604367

SgtMustard, on 11 February 2020 - 05:06 PM, said: Lmao. 10k gold is too much asked for this with auction. Even WG own wiki page lists it's normal gold price at 7.000g.   https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Tank:F106_Panhard_EBR_75_Mle1954

Subject: [Sandbox] New Balance Test Kicks off on February 10
Link on message: #17604344

IIAtomicToastII, on 11 February 2020 - 03:12 PM, said:   1. I know they'll stay in the game, but I just think it's a more complicated system than it needs to be.   2. They're getting nerfed yes, but it's just being done in such a difficult way, why not just reduce the damage of special shells instead of changing EVERYTHING else.   We'll see what comes of this all though 

Subject: [Piaskownica] Testy nowego balansu ruszają 10 lutego
Link on message: #17604294

Ancybot, on 11 February 2020 - 04:08 PM, said: Jak to nie
zapłać żeby wygrać = pay to win

ktoś zapłacił 1500 golda żeby przeskoczyć misje, których nie był w stanie przeskoczyć i wygrał za to ob  260.

Definicyjne P2W

Subject: A very kind inquiry/request toward Dwigt,Parim1331,WG Staff - "NEW BALANC...
Link on message: #17604148

Subject: Sstyxina informuje o novinkách
Link on message: #17603709

Subject: [Team Clash] Support Your Favorite Content Creator!
Link on message: #17603624

rakamaka, on 10 February 2020 - 05:22 PM, said:   I don't agree with the spoiled brats whining here, but your comment is kinda cocky. To avoid that, this info should have been up there at least yesterday, not today, after most of the whining here


Fire_man74, on 10 February 2020 - 05:44 PM, said:
And still nothing abt camo!!!!

Subject: The Black Market is Back!
Link on message: #17603615

Axeltoft, on 11 February 2020 - 03:40 PM, said: Ahh okay, no problem then Was just starting to wonder

Subject: [Piaskownica] Testy nowego balansu ruszają 10 lutego
Link on message: #17603611

Ancybot, on 11 February 2020 - 03:28 PM, said: Wydarzenie było lubiane za dostępną zawartość w pierwszej odsłonie. Druga edycja to jakaś kpina pod tym względem, więc byłbym ostrożny z tak daleko idącymi wnioskami. Poczekajcie na opinie po tej drugiej edycji, a potem mówcie czy ludzie je polubili czy nie

Rekord pobiliście sprzedając rozkazy na 260, to już jest rekord żenady. Jak ktoś był za słaby żeby zdobyć 260, to powinien włożyć wysiłek w to, aby go zdobyć, a nie trzasnąc sobie 3 rozkazy za 1500 golda. To jest właśnie P2W. Otwieranie drzwi do 260 ludziom, którzy nie byli w stanie go zdobyć. Pogratulować

Subject: The Black Market is Back!
Link on message: #17603576

Axeltoft, on 11 February 2020 - 03:13 PM, said: I bid on the Schwarzpanzer 58 and I didnt get the tank or my credits back? What about you guys, have you gotten the tank or credits back, or do I just have to wait some more?

Subject: [Sandbox] New Balance Test Kicks off on February 10
Link on message: #17603572

McFjant, on 11 February 2020 - 11:33 AM, said: How will the Collective and Special Tanks count towards the Master Tanker badge?


xPRZEMEKxx, on 11 February 2020 - 11:53 AM, said:  delete 93 tanks f..... m...….


wremise, on 11 February 2020 - 02:19 PM, said: Whats happening with ramming? is it buffed too, or are you doing still the same ammount of damage while the enemy has more HP?

Subject: [Sandbox] New Balance Test Kicks off on February 10
Link on message: #17603536

McFjant, on 11 February 2020 - 11:55 AM, said:   I'm actually more than unhappy with the "proposed" changes but I've learned over the years that WG don't back away from stupid decisions no matter how much the community is storming. So it's worth nil n' nothing to voice any complaints so why bother with it.

But for your sake I can say that I personally have hated the HE spam over the years and rarely play derp guns myself. But I don't like this change at all as the game is indeed working. In real life you'll find that HE shells do penetrate their intended target before exploding so removing all penetrating values from HE is horrendous.
Removing 92 vehicles from the tech trees just makes the game dull for a low tier player. And removing historical vehicles from the tech tree is stupid and a slap in the face for those that like the historical part of the game. It's also disrespectful towards all the men who fought and in many cases even died in those vehicles, and to their relatives as well.

I fear that this will be the demise of WoT and that I will get more time to pursue my other hobbies in the future.


Crazy_Jon, on 11 February 2020 - 02:12 PM, said: IT will reduce the use of special ammo even more because players tend to use  the shell with The most damage.  Personally I use standard ammo up to 3 times more then premium ones So these changes are very good for me.  Its a very bad pach for gold spamers

Subject: In Angriff nehmen: Neue Balance-Tests
Link on message: #17603512

Curtana, on 11 February 2020 - 02:04 PM, said: ... und wieder englische Untertitel zum englischen Video. Darunter steht aber, dass für das Video keine Untertitel verfügbar wären. Also englische Untertitel bedeuten bei Wargaming keine Untertitel. Es entsteht immer mehr der Eindruck, dass kein Mensch bei Wargaming wirklich überlegt, bevor er was tut. Machen die wirklich nur noch irgendwas, ob sinnvoll oder nicht? Falls ja, werden die Pannen zunehmen. Nicht einmal bei simplen Sachen wird noch etwas richtig gemacht.

Subject: Getting to Grips: New Balance tests
Link on message: #17603475

legendkiller16, on 11 February 2020 - 02:03 PM, said: ...

The one thing I hate is the removal of the majority of low tier tanks.

Subject: [Piaskownica] Testy nowego balansu ruszają 10 lutego
Link on message: #17603473

adjdmd, on 10 February 2020 - 06:54 PM, said: Parim?


Aikon_r, on 10 February 2020 - 08:18 PM, said: Nie hamujcie się Panowie i Panie. W sekcji eng i na ru leci takie wiadro pomyj na Wargaming, że nawet Parim nie jest w stanie tego bałaganu obronić....   GJ!!!   Rozumiem, że otrzymam rekompensatę za M41 (102 peny na HE), za FV 215 b (183) i pare innych czołgów, które po nerfie HE staną się po prostu niegrywalne?


erykos22, on 10 February 2020 - 10:12 PM, said: jak szybko odwrócić uwagę od płaczu na black market? Puścić info o kontrowersyjnych zmianach


Angel_of_Apocalipse, on 10 February 2020 - 11:27 PM, said: Ale jak to bedzie działać ? JPanther II teraz bedzie premium i jak mam go w garazu to bede miał premke ?


krowa_accurate, on 11 February 2020 - 07:53 AM, said: Szanowny deweloperzy Popieram zmiany, których chcecie dokonac i uważam, że są one potrzebne, lecz całkowicie nie rozumiem i nie popieram usuwania czołgów z drzewek technologicznych trwale, bądź dawania i do sklepu premium, przez wiele la dodawaliście nowe pojazdy nie po ty by usunąć teraz aż 92 owoce waszej pracy, zastanówcie się nad tym, bo nie jest to tylko moje zdanie. Jeżeli zależy wam na społeczności z serwera EU, graczach i przychodach z niego, nie wprowadzajcie zmian w drzewkach. 
Miłego dnia


Trybiano, on 11 February 2020 - 12:21 PM, said: To które czomgi leco na premium ?

Subject: Neues vom Supertest: Zwei doppelläufige Sowjets
Link on message: #17603236

Subject: Witness the Dawn of Industry
Link on message: #17603223

Bradders8, on 08 February 2020 - 12:33 PM, said: What a fantastic idea to put the revised start date one day before Valentine's Day....   As if partners would not already be fuming that we would be sitting at the computer every night for 10 days straight.


Psticide, on 08 February 2020 - 12:40 PM, said: even if it was 5 days, still not worth the hassle , stop making it more complicated when the basics of the event are still amateur hour and requiring 5 hours a night for no good reason


the_nebuchadnezzar, on 08 February 2020 - 04:48 PM, said: I hope the guys in my clan will allow me to play 5 battles so I can participate in the auction.  


Sir_Armand, on 09 February 2020 - 02:56 PM, said:
And if the clan reward vehicles were restricted to clan wars, nobody would argue. The issue is, that you take the reward vehicles into random battles, and punish non-clan players with them.


Corrupted_Pling, on 10 February 2020 - 09:54 AM, said: cannot wait to shoot camping kids with my cgc artillery piece


DERIM_NOVOSADISTA, on 10 February 2020 - 12:03 PM, said: ok,pls tell us when event strts,is it february13 or february29,can u tell us pls

Subject: Erlebt den Aufschwung der Wirtschaft
Link on message: #17603190

TehMuffinman571, on 03 February 2020 - 07:15 AM, said: So schon bald gehts hier wieder los. Wann wird die schlammschlacht wieder Geöffnet? Wann gibts ne news dazu damit man rechtzeitig ferien eingeben kann? 


Geno1isme, on 07 February 2020 - 12:36 PM, said: Zumindest hat WG den Pool um 500 Panzer aufgestockt.


Succ33d3d, on 10 February 2020 - 02:20 PM, said: @Zapfhan: Bleibt es beim 13.2.? Wisst ihr dies schon sicher? Danke für deine Hilfe.

Subject: Learn to Play the IS-3-II
Link on message: #17603040

Subject: A very kind inquiry/request toward Dwigt,Parim1331,WG Staff - "NEW BALANC...
Link on message: #17602969

Subject: [Sandbox] New Balance Test Kicks off on February 10
Link on message: #17602913

United_Stealth, on 11 February 2020 - 11:13 AM, said: Are you kidding me? Ive recently bought all german tanks and put a 100% crew in it paid with gold. Now youre telling me youre gonna remove those tanks? What will happen to the crews? Could I have just flushed that gold down the drain???????? 


KanonenVogel19, on 11 February 2020 - 11:30 AM, said:   I tried to visit the Sandbox forum, but it's offline. Fortunately I did have the text + images saved somewhere else, so              First of all, I want to thank you WG for testing these mechanics on the Sandbox server so that all of us can get a chance to try it out and tell you how we feel about the changes. Thank you very much.   I feel that the changes that you’ve made here doesn’t really solve the actual issues with premium ammo. Therefore, I’d like to write you a suggestion on an alternative way of designing this, which in my opinion would be the best solution to the problem.   There’re a few things that I want to mention before presenting the suggestion.   First of all, it’s extremely important to understand that credits cannot be used as a balancing factor. The reason is that players can either grind or purchase credits before a battle, which means that a player can basically have an infinite amount of credits in an individual instance of a battle. Thus, balancing ammo types by their cost will not have any affect on players with a lot of credits. The current state of ranked battles should be enough proof of that.   Secondly, it’s also extremely important to understand that high penetration rounds can exist without being a premium item. This means that the performance of an ammo type, and the cost of an ammo type, are two completely different issues. We should keep in mind that if an item is actually required to play the game, then it should not be a premium item, and on the other hand, if the item is not required to play the game, then there’s no reason for it to exist in the first place.   With that in mind, allow me to present my suggestion.     The entire concept of premium ammo should be completely eliminated. Instead, all different ammo types should be implemented as standard ammo. They should be good and bad at different things, and they should be used in specific situations. It should be the players job to constantly analyze the situation in the battle, and judge what kind of ammo that will do the job in the best way.   My advice is that you implement all current ammo types as realistic as possible. Look into how these shells work in real life, what upsides and downsides they have, and then make them work the same way in the game. If you need to balance the ammo types even further, you can also make small additional adjustments to the damage of each shell type.   Regarding the characteristics of different shells, there are a few important things that I specifically want to highlight.   Overpenetration

APCR shells have a solid core and doesn’t explode after penetration, thus they always run the risk of overpenetration. This means that if the shell has enough penetration to pierce the armor twice, it will simply go straight through the tank and do very little or no damage at all. To inform the player that an overpenetration occurred, you can use the existing notification system, as shown in the image below.     High Explosive Anti-Tank

HEAT shells are not dependent on kinetic energy in order to penetrate, but they do not have the high amount of penetration that they currently have in the game. What makes these shells useful are the fact that they don’t lose penetration over distance. On short distances, these shells might have less penetration than a regular AP shell, but they make up for it at longer distances.

Next, I want to suggest how you should handle the cost of ammo and consumables.
The most important thing is that credits should never be used as a balancing factor in battles. The reason to this is that players with a lot of credits will be able to bypass this balancing, while players with a shortage of credits will have to play at a disadvantage. The battle situation should affect what shell the player loads, and the players economy should never ever interfere with that judgement.   In order to solve this, all ammo types should have the same cost. Of course, it’s fine if there’s a tiny symbolic difference, but this difference should be kept at a minimum and never be more than 5-10%. The point is that players should never think that they don’t want to use an ammo type because it’s expensive, but instead they should equip their tank with the ammo types that they’ll need for different situations in battle.   For consumables, the exact same principle applies. All consumables should cost the same, and the cost should be reduced, so that players make their decision based on what they need and not based on what they can afford. The small versions of consumables should be removed since this will make them redundant.       Thank you for reading, and I really hope that you WG can take this suggestion into consideration. If there’re any questions or missing details, please ask and I will do my best to answer. I would also be very thankful if you WG could at least write a few sentences about what you think of this suggestion.             That was the post I did on the Sandbox forum. Unfortunately it didn't get a single reply from anyone at WG 

Subject: [Sandbox] Test nového vyvážení vypukne 10. února
Link on message: #17602662

Tirpit, on 11 February 2020 - 11:34 AM, said: Ty sem patříš to se tu jakože na jediný věci co WG udělalo dobře asi shodneme naprosto všichni!!(kdo ne tak )A samozřejmně jsem si odjel s FV takže smolík(i když superplečku taky pak "vraceli" takže asi tak,jako že jsem naivní)Ale díky za info(jen by mne zajímalo co ty na to sama říkáš?Mne je jasný že HE/HESH jsou -pokud stojíš naproti "zlo" ale zase tak zlé to taky není horší jsou autíčka a tři arty ve  městě(kde jsou k ničemu)...ale zase si myslím že na vhodných mapách jsou nejen vhodné ale i důležité ale max 2)


Odstrelovac_CZ, on 11 February 2020 - 12:27 PM, said: Při ukázce stromu jsem si nemohl nevšimnout, že z čínského stromu zmizel těžký tank 113 na tieru deset. Tento tank mám čerstvě vyzkoumaný, ale nemám ho koupený, protože kredity, které jsem si na něj rezervoval skončili v black marketu. Chtěl bych se tedy dotázat, jestli mám momentálně urgentně šetřit kredity, na nákup tohoto tanku, než z větve zmizí, nebo jestli ho stejně jako nižší tiery půjde koupit mimo technologický strom. Sstyx nevíš o tom něco?


rokocz, on 11 February 2020 - 12:36 PM, said: Jedno nepřehledné vlákno není vhodné pro zpětnou vazbu, čekal jsem normální rozdělení na vlákna "strom, munice, artyny, rebalanc...". 
Jinak mě udivuje množství stížností na omezení počtu nízkých tierů - tady se opravdu zastamu WG, pro nové hráče je to skutečně velmi nepřehledné ta přemírá nízkých tierů, která je navíc zbytečná. Navíc vy co si tu stěžujete - díval jsem se a vy nízké tiery nehrajete, pokrytci, mějte trošku nadhled. Navíc vám ty tanky zůstanou jako "speciální", takže si je klidne budete moct (ne)hrát dál. Celkové úpravy nižších tierů, tedy zpřehlednění a hlavně buff HP hodnotím jako největší klad.

Pokračoval jsem v testování a názor na zbytek neměním, jak jsem psal - o trochu méně se goldí, gold je teď víc nevýhodný, OP stroje jako 279 jsou ještě víc OP. Doufám, že toto se dostane aspoň k někomu: pokud uděláte tuto změnu bez rebalancnutí Učka, 279 a dalších, rozlučte se se mnou a nejspíš i s další kupou již tak znechucených hráčů.

Subject: [Sandbox] New Balance Test Kicks off on February 10
Link on message: #17602447

19ANDER02, on 10 February 2020 - 10:09 PM, said: The whole game needed only two major changes: lowering the alpha damage of premium/special shells and HP increase on lower tiers.   Instead of that WG decides to completely rebuild the whole game by not touching premium ammo () and changing all the other statistics which in result makes players re-learn the whole game, huge amount of stats, etc.Moreover, they get rid of 92 vehicles which provided the diversity right from the get go and made new players learn different classes. Now they are supposed to magically play TDs or SPGs well at tier V when it's their first contact with these classes (hello, tiers II-IV are supposed to prepare new players for higher level and bigger challenges on higher tiers).   Ironically, both the increase of HP and alpha damage of standard shells is going to make battles even faster because of 25% RNG cause now e.g. BC25t will be able to one-clip another tier X med or even HT which isn't the case right now. And there are more examples like this. This whole HP/alpha damage would even make sense if RNG was lowered to about 10% but it's still choosing the longer and worse way instead of just nerfing prem ammo or simply putting its limit in each every vehicle per battle (e.g. only 15% of ammo carried by you can be the special one - and this way the weakpoints could be reintroduced to the vehicles once the special rounds are not spammed on every single occasion).   Just to sum it up, these current plans of WG are even worse than the infamous Rubicon patch...


Jogonam, on 10 February 2020 - 10:44 PM, said: At the moment your defense in a cumbersome tank with a big gun, against nimble lightly armored tanks, was to shoot one high explosive and hope for the best. But perhaps that isn't working for the давай meta .
It would be nice if you had a pool on this thread or another, where we can vote if we like the changes or otherwise.
As for the tech tree changes, I'm sure that is just a joke or something else, that will not be implemented on the live server. 


Backewatsch, on 11 February 2020 - 12:12 AM, said: So I have been trying the "New Balance" for a while, and here are my conclusions.
  New Balance does *not* work. The reason for that is that it doesn't address the main problem of standard ammo: It's low penetration, making it impossible to penetrate many newer, heavily armored vehicles. In the end this forces vehicles with low standard ammunition penetration to resort to premium ammo anyway. What New Balance does is to give vehicles with a high standard ammo pen an even bigger advantage than before, since they can keep using standard ammo and do not have to fall back to premium ammo to do damage.   New Balance will also widen the gap between tank tiers, as lower tier tanks have a harder time penetrating most higher tanks, while higher tier tanks can easily penetrate lower tier tanks. That means a low tier tank will still have to use premium ammo to do damage and gets punished by doing less damage, while the higher tier tank can use standard ammo and benefit from its higher Damage.   What is WG trying to achieve with the new damage model? They say they want to encourage players to use standard ammo more often. But what is the point of that? If I would pen with standard ammo anyway, using premium ammo doesn't make a difference. If I wouldn't pen with standard ammo anyway, using it is still pointless, regardless of how much more potential damage it does.   This means that New Balance actually doesn't at all reward players for using standard ammo, but punishes them if they have no other chance than to use premium ammo (because they wouldn't otherwise do damage).
The real solution for this problem would simply be to generally somewhat increase standard ammo penetration and somewhat decrease premium ammo penetration. That would remove the "auto pen" property of premium ammunition, force you to aim at weak spots again and just give you a better chance to pen there, and not everywhere on a tank. A better standard penetration would mean that in many case you might have a chance to penetrate weak spots without having to use premium ammo.
On top of that, certain premium tanks are made obsolete (Chrysler K e.g. very much depends on premium ammo, and that has been intentionally implemented by WG).
New Balance is a nerf for every low standard ammo pen and thus also most low tier tanks.
If the "New Balance" model will go live as it is now, it will create more problems than it will solve.


mrnewton, on 11 February 2020 - 12:32 AM, said: Am i understanding correctly that the credits i spent in the sandbox will not affect me in the standard wot version at all?

Subject: [Sandbox] Test nového vyvážení vypukne 10. února
Link on message: #17602303

Tirpit, on 10 February 2020 - 11:46 PM, said: Sstyx-můžeš zjisti zda jde(půjde)vrátit  FV215b (183) pokud jí takto změní!!(a asi nejen tu-týká se to i  FV atd.. 22:53 Added after 6 minute Jsi opravdu v pořádku?Brčíš ty na HE!(tedy ty jsi mimochodem skvělej hráč a asi by jsi plakal pokud by ti nerfli Dickermaxe se kterým máš 1300!!!bitev:-))Víš nejde o tu munici jen ale o to že jsi si koupil něco ne levného hvězdu a oni ji brutálně nerfnou-jako kdysi superplečku kterou "museli" nakonec dát v možnosti "vrátíme vám peníze/goldy.Rozumíš tomu?!(mám rád hráče jako ty co jsou "chytrý" ale hrajou jen s low tierama-s X tobě zrovna to nejde viď)


borisnikitic, on 10 February 2020 - 11:55 PM, said: No podla mňa robia naraz toľko zmien, aby sa v tom stratilo že by chceli predávať collectors tanky nad 6 tier za goldy. Došli nápady na prémiové tanky, tak vymysleli collectors tanky. Bude to taká nejaká habadúra


guthas, on 11 February 2020 - 05:41 AM, said: Ať se na to koukám jak chce, pořád mi to přijde jako šílenství zavádět takové úpravy.  Nevidím jediný důvod, proč by explozivní náboj neměl procházet armorem. Opravdu je to to po čem komunita volá Sstyx? 


Tirpit, on 11 February 2020 - 10:27 AM, said: SStyx je možné napsat sem zda to tu čteme jen my nebo i někdo kdo to předá dál?

Subject: [Sandbox] New Balance Test Kicks off on February 10
Link on message: #17602247

KanonenVogel19, on 10 February 2020 - 06:11 PM, said:   And what about the players that can't afford to pay more credits? Why should these players be forced to play at a disadvantage? This is a pay-to-win aspect and this is why I've suggested that the entire concept of premium ammo should be removed and all shells should cost the same.   The announcement states that these changes will make it more fair for everyone, but that's not the case, since players with a shortage of credits will still not be able to load high penetration rounds against heavily armored targets. Why is it so extremely important for WG to only allow players with a lot of credits to have multiple shells to choose from?


McFjant, on 10 February 2020 - 06:14 PM, said: What about XP that's been used to unlock T-62A, 113, AMX-30 & AMX-30B?


nightcrow82, on 10 February 2020 - 06:26 PM, said: So basic of the change is to rip off us old players. So i have researched the whole tech tree and now you are gonna take that away from me? 


Artur__Rosiak, on 10 February 2020 - 07:07 PM, said: Most important question now. When can we expect this to hit live? I want to know how much time do I have to research 113 and T-62A, and re-buy the tanks I already researched. Would be nice is someone from Wargaming gave us an estimated date. 


Gruff_, on 10 February 2020 - 07:08 PM, said: Will you be nerfing the object 430, 430u and the ridiculous reward tank 279e then? 


IIAtomicToastII, on 10 February 2020 - 07:21 PM, said: It's great seeing you trying to improve the game but there's two things that I completely disagree with.   1. The tech tree changes; simplifying it is great, and by that I mean categorising everything in a logical manner, but special vehicles seems totally unnecessary, why not just add filters for the tech tree like in the garage? That way you can easily simplify the tech tree while still keeping the vehicles.   2. The ammo changes; honestly, just nerf premium ammo. Get over it, it's a global nerf, it's not a premium tank, you can nerf it. Save yourself the trouble of readjusting basically EVERYTHING else and just make one change instead of a million other changes.   The rest of the ideas and proposed changes are great.


Gkirmathal, on 10 February 2020 - 07:36 PM, said:   Excuse me Parim, but that is a severe contradiction. So the player base for years have been asking for buffs to heavy tanks via changing the Special Round damage output?   But lets us rewind to 2016, under the supposed scapegoat supervision of Murazor: - In 2016/2018, the HD model reworks resulted in an overall reduction of armor model complexity, also widely known as the: reduction of armor weak spots. - In this period, until he was sacked in 2018, armor models of various existing content (mainly heavy tanks and heaviums) and a lot of new premium content got positively upped through with same paradigm: homogeneous but thicker armor model layouts with fewer, to sometimes no, weak spots. - Whereby making Special Rounds more necessary vs a larger part of the in-game armoured content, to be effective to counter said content. - Thereby: increasing a players credit drain, thus increasing the need to run a WoT Premium Account to negate said credit drain, or purchasing of premium content. - In this period the negative feedback on Special Ammo spam increased significantly, where renowned players and CC's regularly mentioned: the need for Special Ammo to counter such weak-spot-less armor layouts, when flanking is prohibited by linear map design introduced by the 1.0 map changes. - More recently: the whole inflation of the credit economy since 2018, through over saturation of marathons/events and missions rewarding credits. And the introduction of the WoT Premium account, which has an even higher credit & exp coefficient. - New features that act like credit drains, like the Black Market are an effective means of getting back control of the credit inflation.   Parim, the contradiction here is players have for years now (at least on the EU) been asking for a different approach: (1) better armor layouts with effective (2) weak spots that can be effectively targeted by same tier and lower tier content. (3) Armor layouts that do not promote Special Rounds to be used to be(come)(more) competitive in an engagement.   What has been done to alleviate this numbers 1,2 and 3 in this whole rework? Because increasing the HP pools by 20% on those tanks with "problemous" armor profiles, effectively means a buff to their effectiveness equal to their received 20% HP buff. If reworking of armor profile and reintroduction of proper weak spots is out of the question, for what ever valid or non valid reason, then at least scrap the HP buffs to those pieces of content with problemous armor profiles completely to offset.   So one could deduct two things (maybe more). WG again misinterpreted feedback. Or is this whole rework is just a means to further consolidate the monetization schemes throughout the product,


adharus, on 10 February 2020 - 07:48 PM, said: over all,the real goal of this changes is cristall clear: a huge increase in credit costs for ammo resupling,therefour,making wot premium a must in order to be able to play high tiers...another kick in the but toword free players...  since a huge nomber of vehicols are compleatly imune to ap fiered frome majority of theyr oponents,and since he are no longer an option (deth star give in average 300-400 damage per shot now,with the ammo that it supose to giv3 1100),fiering an severily increased nomber of gold shels it has become the only solution...how stupids wg conseder we are not to see this simple thing?    


adharus, on 10 February 2020 - 07:53 PM, said: so,basicly i will ask refunf for ALL my bought it premium vehicols,since those sre nerfed  (he penn removal)...the only one i can't is kv2 ® who,tecknicly,reteained the payed nombers  


gunslingerXXX, on 10 February 2020 - 08:26 PM, said: Kudo's for being here Parim, explaining some choices and answering questions!    Maybe now its clear why a new community manager should know the game?     Sry about being rude to dwight... he deserves a chance, but come on... we also deserve some proper feedback. Yesterday half a million in gold was removed from EU server. Likely a sufficient part from English speaking part...   I want Eek back        Also on topic, interested to see how the changes will work out. Frankly I'm starting to get quite annoyed that at the moment each hit I take is either ammo-rack and/or fire. Installing the test client right now.


DaRealJuzz, on 10 February 2020 - 11:28 PM, said: So basically you are saying: "The only derp guns we at Wargaming recognizes are the KV-2 and KV-2®". Bye bye to all the other derp tanks

Subject: Nouvel équilibre : Apprenez-en plus !
Link on message: #17602120

bardiel_fr, on 10 February 2020 - 07:34 PM, said: Un sous-titrage dans les différentes langues des joueurs est-il prévu ? Non parce que s'il faut endurer 3h d'anglais, je passe.


Michael_Whiteman, on 10 February 2020 - 10:54 PM, said: Et ducoup, je n'est pas compris....
L'amx 30 et 30B, il deviennent quoi ?

Subject: Black Market is back :)
Link on message: #17602015

Maaaaaad, on 10 February 2020 - 04:34 PM, said: Does anyone know where the SU76i resolution news will be posted ? 

Subject: Top of the Tree: T110E3
Link on message: #17601169

yodelihiti, on 06 February 2020 - 03:41 PM, said: Rental did arrive earlier today.

Subject: Was habt Ihr heute geschafft?
Link on message: #17600942

Subject: [Sandbox] Test nového vyvážení vypukne 10. února
Link on message: #17600904

rokocz, on 10 February 2020 - 10:44 PM, said: Nevím kam psát zpětnou reakci, modi nějak nezaložili vlákno...

 

Subject: The Black Market is Back!
Link on message: #17600662

Hoba_rce, on 10 February 2020 - 07:57 PM, said: Just found out that you can buy the orders more than once. Bought them in the afternoon on my PC and now i started the game on my laptop and orders were for sale again, I guess you can buy them as many times as you logon from different machines (or delete the game cache or whatever?)   Anyway i needed only the first 3 to finish last ST-15 mission fot the obj. 260. This seems like another fail from WG 


grievous12, on 10 February 2020 - 06:19 PM, said: still not received the silver back from auction ffs


Jonathan078NL, on 10 February 2020 - 06:43 PM, said: Thanks alot WG,   I have to say, I'm kinda glad with the Black market offers for silver so far. I allready spended my xmas gold on a Löwe and Strv S1. Had enough silver, so this BM I was able to obtain allready;   Lansen C Chrysler K GF FV215 (183) - Last year I passed, I regretted it a little Schwarzen Pz. 58   I have to admit I lost some extra millions of silver underway by overbidding, I had a feeling I was overbidding but I had to be sure to obtain the tanks, cause I really think it's worth it for silver. "Better save then Sorry" My silver reserves are very low now, but thats when premium tanks are for, grind some extra silver.   My biological clock is pretty messed up though

Subject: Černý trh je zpátky!
Link on message: #17600520

tatarkaz, on 10 February 2020 - 09:28 PM, said: chci se zeptat,když jsem zakoupil rozkazy proč je mohu použít jen na obj 260? a ne na obj 269,asi jsem něco přehlíd,děkuji

Subject: Černý trh je zpátky!
Link on message: #17600389

Leeroy_YOLO, on 10 February 2020 - 09:10 PM, said: Jestlipak on se spíš nepřihlašuje z NB pod jiným účtem.. Já to taky na druhým mám pořád dostupné Ale rozkazů jen houšť po všech těch nabídkách tanků, kvůli kterým jsem zbytečně vstával, to bylo milé překvapení, hlavně ten neomezený počet. Bylo by fajn, kdyby příště ten chlap, když ví, co mám v garáži, mi napsal, že další nabídka pro mě bude až pozítří odpoledne a nemusel jsem kvůli němu 2x vstávat kvůli něčemu, co už jsem třeba měl. To docela odrazuje. A když neutratím kredity a goldy v BM, přes rok pro mě nic moc zajímavého nemáte, goldy mám na několik let PÚ dopředu, tak nemám pak důvod kupovat cokoliv dalšího. Snažte se

Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17600377

Koggli, on 10 February 2020 - 09:06 PM, said: A ta koncovka je jaká?

Subject: Černý trh je zpátky!
Link on message: #17600360

Hoba_rce, on 10 February 2020 - 09:04 PM, said:   Jo, tohle se mi ukáže na PC, kde jsem je odpoledne koupil. Když se přihlásím na NTB vidím rozkazy znovu na prodej za 1.500.  

Subject: Diskuze - Sstyxina informuje
Link on message: #17600337

Koggli, on 10 February 2020 - 08:54 PM, said: Sstyx a nepleteš se trochu s těmi webkami na replaye? Je ještě jedna stránka na replaye, Každý si může vybrat. Např. já ji občas používám protože má oproti wotreplay rozšířené funkce jako např.  mi umožňuje se dívat i na profily kteréhokoliv hráče z dané bitvy. Případně mi vypočítá můj výkon v bitvě na WN8 atd. Je to wot-record.com/

Subject: Černý trh je zpátky!
Link on message: #17600320

Hoba_rce, on 10 February 2020 - 08:50 PM, said: Rozkazy jdou koupit víckrát. Koupil jsem je odpoledne na PC, teď jsem zapnul jsem WoT na notebooku a po přihlášení byl rozkazy ke koupi znova...takže asi koupíte tolikrát, na kolika různých PC se přihlásíte. Mě tedy stačily pouze ty 3 na poslední ST-15 misi, koupil jsem pouze 1x a ještě je nepoužil...ale nabízí mi to za 1500 znova, zatímco na PC to píše, že už mám nakoupeno.    Další fail od WG.