Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehniskā palīdzība\Lokalizacijas kludas un bagi
Link on message: #651064

Link on message: #651064
OldFox: He-he, nevajag neko taisit pasiem : http://forum.worldof...post__p__651063
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Svarīgā informācija\Speles atskanojums latviesu valoda
Link on message: #651063

Link on message: #651063
OldFox: Kopa ar paca 0.6.5 iznaksanas spele vajag paradities atskanojumam
latviesu valoda. Kad bus pacs 0.6.5., nav konkreti zinams, bet ir
100% zinams, ka darbi pie speles atskanosanas ir pabeigti!
Subject:
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\Make Your Clan Propaganda Poster!
Link on message: #650502
PijacMali, on 22 June 2011 - 08:10 PM, said: There was poetry, there was Matryoshka challenge, and you don't
have to be a CS/CD/Paint expert to be creative in making good pics
and coming up with good jokes/mottoes and stuff, there are loots of
ways to be creative. I'm just saying. 

Link on message: #650502


Vallter: Not to mention 'Kill the Mod' events
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\realistic gameplay
Link on message: #650501
Adanakebab, on 22 June 2011 - 10:02 PM, said: will world of tanks ever have realistic gameplay. i mean like in
red orchestra if u look at this game thats is the big missing part
u can play with friends 1 tank. in red orchestra u can command with
a few people 1 tank commander, gunner, loader like that i put a
video of it. http://www.gametrail...rchestra/711635 go 4:00
mins

Link on message: #650501

LiannaSilverwind: I'm afraid WG does not plan to do so, hence their teaser: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=D4Kuumslq4M
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Tā ir oficiāla WG nostāja?
Link on message: #650373
mierigais, on 22 June 2011 - 07:35 PM, said: minētā iemesla dēļ domāju pamest rus serveri pēc 6.5 izlaišanas

Link on message: #650373

OldFox: Ja, protams,vajag pievienoties EU serverim.
Subject:
Off-Topic Discussion\Historical Discussion\Russian troops left Czechoslovakia
Link on message: #650074
Botan, on 21 June 2011 - 05:15 PM, said: Yes it's truth, but we have to remember that off course nobody
asked Warsaw pact countries or Russians if they want to invasion.
Communists are responsible, they give a order.
http://en.wikipedia..../Ryszard_Siwiec

Link on message: #650074

http://en.wikipedia..../Ryszard_Siwiec
LiannaSilverwind: We should also remember how did some Czechoslovac communists called
Soviet Union for military help against "imperialist
contrarevolution": http://cs.wikipedia....vac%C3%AD_dopis
There were some demonstrations in Soviet Union against invasion of Czechoslovakia, all demonstrants were arrested and persecuted. Mass media spoke about how Warsaw Pact saved poor Czechoslovakia before damn capitalist yoke. People in Soviet Union knew nothing about what really happened.
There were some demonstrations in Soviet Union against invasion of Czechoslovakia, all demonstrants were arrested and persecuted. Mass media spoke about how Warsaw Pact saved poor Czechoslovakia before damn capitalist yoke. People in Soviet Union knew nothing about what really happened.
Subject:
Off-Topic Discussion\Historical Discussion\ware german tanks better than the oposition?
Link on message: #650062
Hunter3309, on 22 June 2011 - 03:24 AM, said: joke aside, that's what I always say, it is prety remarcabile how
long they lasted, most countryes these days don't last 1 month in a
war against 1 country, Germany lasted 6 years against almost the
entire planet with minimum allies.

Link on message: #650062

LiannaSilverwind: Let's compare situation of Germany in, let's say, spring 1942.
Germany, Austria (part of Germany), conquered Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, France (+ Vichy), Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Greece, great part of European Soviet Union
Allies: Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland
Count population, amount of resources needed for fueling the war machine
Now compare to:
Great Britain (isolated on British Isles, fighting in Pacific, South-East Asia, North Africa)
USA (awaking and fighting in Pacific, no real danger to Germany for now)
Soviet Union (reeling after horrible losses of population, soldiers, tanks, aircraft, lost great amount of resources needed for fueling the war machine)
Count population and amount of resources.
Now let's ask the question: how is it possible that Allies had won?
German tanks were superior, amount of working population was strongly in favour of the Axis, most resources - in favour of the Axis. What has happened?
Germany, Austria (part of Germany), conquered Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, France (+ Vichy), Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Greece, great part of European Soviet Union
Allies: Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland
Count population, amount of resources needed for fueling the war machine
Now compare to:
Great Britain (isolated on British Isles, fighting in Pacific, South-East Asia, North Africa)
USA (awaking and fighting in Pacific, no real danger to Germany for now)
Soviet Union (reeling after horrible losses of population, soldiers, tanks, aircraft, lost great amount of resources needed for fueling the war machine)
Count population and amount of resources.
Now let's ask the question: how is it possible that Allies had won?
German tanks were superior, amount of working population was strongly in favour of the Axis, most resources - in favour of the Axis. What has happened?

Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Horribly broken level system for tank companies
Link on message: #649943
RokRoland, on 22 June 2011 - 12:33 PM, said: Math:
9 = 5 + 4.
Company tiers:
9 = 5 + 4.
It is elementary school maths.

Link on message: #649943

9 = 5 + 4.
Company tiers:
9 = 5 + 4.
It is elementary school maths.
LiannaSilverwind: Yes, I understood VGA poster wrong. Shame to me, especially when I
teach maths. 
Considering WG plans: I have read on RU forum that there are plans to change Company battles into better tiered mods, but that it's not their main priority. Sadly.

Considering WG plans: I have read on RU forum that there are plans to change Company battles into better tiered mods, but that it's not their main priority. Sadly.
Subject:
Clans\Clan Recruitment\Red Tide is recruiting!
Link on message: #649920
Sech, on 22 June 2011 - 10:47 AM, said: Лето... Отпуска/дачи/пьянки/шашлыки... Короче, эвенты и квесты
IRL.
Однако, и на глобалку хочется вернуться. Пожалуй, попробуем совмещать.

Link on message: #649920

Однако, и на глобалку хочется вернуться. Пожалуй, попробуем совмещать.
LiannaSilverwind: И на этом песня не кончается
Мы построим новый полигон!
Мы построим новый полигон!
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Historically inaccurate tank performance
Link on message: #649915
Zoijar, on 22 June 2011 - 02:18 PM, said: Footnote: the poll only represents the opinion of players, not the
actual fact. The game may be perfectly balanced, but the consensus
might still be that it is unbalanced. However, it'd be prudent to
take opinions of the player base seriously.

Link on message: #649915

LiannaSilverwind: I absolutely agree with you. 

Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #649470
waylander1, on 22 June 2011 - 03:36 PM, said: A thread has been opened on another page showing that you are
running a X5 Experience for 5 days fathers day promotion on the US
server, do you have plans to run anything like that for the EU
server and if so when?

Link on message: #649470

Overlord: Follow the news on the official website and you won't miss anything
important.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #649467
Nathaniak, on 21 June 2011 - 10:41 PM, said: Do you think that unreleased tanks (e.g. French, UK, Japan, ect.)
will be used in clan wars to same extent that in-game tanks are?
(Obviously allowing enough time for players to grind for them)
In effect, will they be as competitive as current tanks?
Also, regarding the UK Russian premium tanks:
What module setting will they have in relation to the British ones? Stock? Fully upgraded? Half-way? Any rough speculation would be welcomed.

Link on message: #649467

In effect, will they be as competitive as current tanks?
Also, regarding the UK Russian premium tanks:
What module setting will they have in relation to the British ones? Stock? Fully upgraded? Half-way? Any rough speculation would be welcomed.
Overlord: 1) Some of them will definitely be competitive and usable.
2) Current Churchill and Matilda (Soviet premiums) are somewhat semi-stock or semi-maximized in terms of performance.
2) Current Churchill and Matilda (Soviet premiums) are somewhat semi-stock or semi-maximized in terms of performance.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #649453
Charcharo, on 21 June 2011 - 04:55 PM, said: Hello Overlord! I have a couple of questions:
1) When does the Bulgarian translation come out. I know its ready, and the translator is just waiting for WG to ask him to give it to them.
2) Can you share the M4A2E4 stats in comparison with other T5 meds or premium tanks? I really love this tank, but the gun really needs the 0,37 accuracy the non-premium version has (prem gun is 0,4 and actual non-premium gun is 0,37)

Link on message: #649453

1) When does the Bulgarian translation come out. I know its ready, and the translator is just waiting for WG to ask him to give it to them.
2) Can you share the M4A2E4 stats in comparison with other T5 meds or premium tanks? I really love this tank, but the gun really needs the 0,37 accuracy the non-premium version has (prem gun is 0,4 and actual non-premium gun is 0,37)
Overlord: 1) No sure yet when it is going to be done.
2) Its performance is similar to the performance of T34 and Pz III/IV. Not bad overall.
2) Its performance is similar to the performance of T34 and Pz III/IV. Not bad overall.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #649440
Brodan, on 21 June 2011 - 04:42 PM, said: after reading recent replies: why is WoT development so
troubled/slow(ish)? After all, you claimed WG team is 200+
staff...
Does not compute

Link on message: #649440

Does not compute
Overlord: It is getting faster.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #649436
Wriothesley, on 21 June 2011 - 03:09 PM, said: Hi:
I'm not sure if it was answered (or asked), so:
When German tree is changed, and Tiger 2 will have new next tank.
1) Assuming, I have Tiger 2 elite before change, will this new tank be also researched, or I will have to again grind on Tiger 2 for the new tank?
2) How will this look, if the Tiger 2 did not yet researched the next tank?
3) If the Tiger 2 has the next tank reaserched (before change, VK4500...) - will it stay researched if I will not have it in garage?

Link on message: #649436

I'm not sure if it was answered (or asked), so:
When German tree is changed, and Tiger 2 will have new next tank.
1) Assuming, I have Tiger 2 elite before change, will this new tank be also researched, or I will have to again grind on Tiger 2 for the new tank?
2) How will this look, if the Tiger 2 did not yet researched the next tank?
3) If the Tiger 2 has the next tank reaserched (before change, VK4500...) - will it stay researched if I will not have it in garage?
Overlord: 1) You will have to unlock E-75 separately.
2) E-75 will be locked/unresearched on default.
3) VK4502 will remain unlocked.
2) E-75 will be locked/unresearched on default.
3) VK4502 will remain unlocked.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Statistically impossible loosing strikes
Link on message: #649043
Pips, on 22 June 2011 - 11:07 AM, said: Well if u think that i (or other platoon members) didnt tried, we
did like in every round we play (i am tired of doing everything
myself - scouting, covering, helping, attacking, flanking.)
Quote And it was better to try and fail than not to try at all.

Link on message: #649043

LiannaSilverwind: I definitely do not claim you did not do your best. I just tried to
give an example of "certainly lost" battle due to team composition,
but still we tried... and won.
Quote And it was better to try and fail than not to try at all.
LiannaSilverwind:
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Someone quitting deliberately and ruining the battle
Link on message: #648787

Link on message: #648787
LiannaSilverwind: Current WG plans are to make quitters' tank remain in battle for 2
more minutes, therefore allowing it to be farmed like it deserves.
Subject:
Contests & Competitions\Contests\Clan Propaganda Poster
Link on message: #648775

Link on message: #648775
Vallter: Do you remember the famous WWll propaganda posters? “Motherland is
calling you!”, “I want you for US army” with Uncle Sam and “Raising
the Flag on Iwo Jima”. Everyone of them was designed to arise
patriotic feelings in nations, to help the existing forces, or
simply to make someone join the army. We do not have military
forces as such, but we have clans!
We are proud to introduce to you our new “Clan Propaganda Poster” contest, which will last for 2 weeks and end on the 5th of July.
Important requirements and notes about creating works for the contest:
• The main theme is “Clan Propaganda Poster”, it has to attract people in the manner "Hey, I will join this guys for sure!";
• Every user can take part in the contest;
• Only one work per player is allowed;
• The image should not violate the game/forum rules, or EULA.
• The maximal resolution is 1024x768, the size should not exceed not exceed 900kb and it should be in the JPG format.
The best image will be rewarded with 6 000 gold.
The runner-up will receive 4 500 gold.
The third prize-taker will get 3 000 gold.
Discussion on the contest and presented works is here.
According to Chapter 3 Section D. of WN Terms of Service: if you upload any photograph, video, or audio file to or through any WN Communication Feature, you grant to WN the non-exclusive, worldwide right to use, post, publish and display such material, without royalty or compensation of any kind, expressly waive any and all rights of privacy, moral rights or rights of attribution and integrity.
P.S. To help ensure the competitions are a fun for most situations, the event section is heavily moderated. Only posts containing “Contest Works” are to be posted, any discussion comments or text messages will be deleted and sanctioned. If you have any questions regarding the event please instead pm them to me or Cheeka.
We are proud to introduce to you our new “Clan Propaganda Poster” contest, which will last for 2 weeks and end on the 5th of July.
Important requirements and notes about creating works for the contest:
• The main theme is “Clan Propaganda Poster”, it has to attract people in the manner "Hey, I will join this guys for sure!";
• Every user can take part in the contest;
• Only one work per player is allowed;
• The image should not violate the game/forum rules, or EULA.
• The maximal resolution is 1024x768, the size should not exceed not exceed 900kb and it should be in the JPG format.
The best image will be rewarded with 6 000 gold.
The runner-up will receive 4 500 gold.
The third prize-taker will get 3 000 gold.
Discussion on the contest and presented works is here.
According to Chapter 3 Section D. of WN Terms of Service: if you upload any photograph, video, or audio file to or through any WN Communication Feature, you grant to WN the non-exclusive, worldwide right to use, post, publish and display such material, without royalty or compensation of any kind, expressly waive any and all rights of privacy, moral rights or rights of attribution and integrity.
P.S. To help ensure the competitions are a fun for most situations, the event section is heavily moderated. Only posts containing “Contest Works” are to be posted, any discussion comments or text messages will be deleted and sanctioned. If you have any questions regarding the event please instead pm them to me or Cheeka.
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Tā ir oficiāla WG nostāja?
Link on message: #648648

Link on message: #648648
OldFox: Lito, gribu uzdavinat tev avataru:
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Tā ir oficiāla WG nostāja?
Link on message: #648626
bReeTz, on 22 June 2011 - 10:00 AM, said: Patria bik "neiebrauca"- neviens te neraud par nacistu (un jā, ir
atšķirība starp nacismu un fašismu) slavinošu lietu/nosaukumu
banošanu- satraukums ir par to, ka wargaming pārstāvji uzskata, ka
NKVD, smerš u.t.t. nav noziedzīgas struktūras... Diezgan tizla
pieeja, ņemot vērā to, ka 90% pārējās Eiropas starp NKVD un SS
liktu vienādības zīmi, bet, kā jau visi zinām- Krievija un
Baltkrievija it sevišķi dzīvo savā informācijas telpā un uz pārējo
viedokli šiem uzspļaut..

Link on message: #648626

OldFox: WG balstas tikai un vienigi uz starptautiskiem juridiskiem
dokumentiem. Ja tu zini kadas starptautiskas tiesas spriedumu, kur
ir teikts, ka NKVD un Smers ir noziedzigas "organizacijas", ludzu,
atsuti man linku.
"...90% pārējās Eiropas starp NKVD un SS liktu vienādības zīmi" - tas ta ir tikai politiska un ideologiska joma, nevis jurisprudence. Bet WG ar politiku un ideologiju nenodarbojas - viniem nav tiesibu to darit. JA butu juridiskais pamats likt so vienādības zīmi, tad butu cita lieta.
Ludzu nejaukt kompaniju Wargaming.net un tas darbiniekus.
"...90% pārējās Eiropas starp NKVD un SS liktu vienādības zīmi" - tas ta ir tikai politiska un ideologiska joma, nevis jurisprudence. Bet WG ar politiku un ideologiju nenodarbojas - viniem nav tiesibu to darit. JA butu juridiskais pamats likt so vienādības zīmi, tad butu cita lieta.
Ludzu nejaukt kompaniju Wargaming.net un tas darbiniekus.
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Tā ir oficiāla WG nostāja?
Link on message: #648581
Lito, on 22 June 2011 - 08:49 AM, said: Nu protams ka Nirnbergas līgumā nekas nav rakstīts par NKVD, jo tas
ko viņi darīja pārsvarā pēc 2. pasaules kara un es jau labāk
nepieminēšu represijas kas notika visās Baltijas valstīs, jo es
vienkārši negribu meklēt problēmas.
Pieņemšu to ka runā tikai manas emocijas.
Par manu avataru: Pamatā es to ieliku, lai ieriebtu visiem sarkano zvaigžņu faniem, bet noteikumos ir šāda rinda "[restricted to use] Nazi leaders, which may provoke strong negative reaction/association or promote national/ethnic/religious hatred."
Vai mans avatars tevī rada nacionālu/etnisku/reliģisku naidu, ja jā tad jau tā būtībā nav mana problēma...
Protams, lai netaisītu problēmas es to nomainīšu.
Ja kas, katram ir savi elki, es neaiztikšu Staļinu un sarkanās zvaignes, Tu neaiztiec mani, kā arī tas bija Hermann Göring, nevis Gering.
Starp citu, tu daudz uzrakstīji, bet maz par to ko mēs īstenībā prasījām... KĀPĒC WG ir šāda nostāja?!
Tāpēc ka NKVD neskaitās noziedzisks?

Link on message: #648581

Pieņemšu to ka runā tikai manas emocijas.
Par manu avataru: Pamatā es to ieliku, lai ieriebtu visiem sarkano zvaigžņu faniem, bet noteikumos ir šāda rinda "[restricted to use] Nazi leaders, which may provoke strong negative reaction/association or promote national/ethnic/religious hatred."
Vai mans avatars tevī rada nacionālu/etnisku/reliģisku naidu, ja jā tad jau tā būtībā nav mana problēma...
Protams, lai netaisītu problēmas es to nomainīšu.
Ja kas, katram ir savi elki, es neaiztikšu Staļinu un sarkanās zvaignes, Tu neaiztiec mani, kā arī tas bija Hermann Göring, nevis Gering.
Starp citu, tu daudz uzrakstīji, bet maz par to ko mēs īstenībā prasījām... KĀPĒC WG ir šāda nostāja?!
Tāpēc ka NKVD neskaitās noziedzisks?
OldFox: Par avataru: es tevi maigi pabridinaju, tu esi izlasijis
bridinajumu un Foruma noteikumus. Talak viss ir tavas rokas. Gaidu
lidz piektdienai.
Par visu citu:
1. "Vai mans avatars tevī rada nacionālu/etnisku/reliģisku naidu, ja jā tad jau tā būtībā nav mana problēma..." Mana galvena problema ir labi pildit savus dienesta pienakumus, un nenobanojot tevi uzreiz, es tos parkapu. Bet tu vel man seit provoce. Nu, paldies tev, dargais
Bet es esmu pateicis vardu -
"piektdiena", un no sava varda neatteiksos, kaut gan loti
gribas.
2. KĀPĒC WG ir šāda nostāja?! - kurs tev ir teicis, ka WG vispar ir kaut kada "nostaja"? WG ir liela kompanija, tur strada vairak par 200 cilveku. Ja tu gribi zinat kompanijas viedokli, es tev auksa visu paskaidroju. Bet ja tu gribi zinat, kapec tam cilvekam, kurs ir rakstijis so atbildi (es varu tikai minet, ka tas bija SerB), nu tad prasi, ludzu, vinam.
Bet man ir tada "priekssajuta", ka es varu aptuveni zinat atbildi: tapec, ka Baltkrievuja no vaciesiem kara laika gajusi boja atuveni 2 400 000 cilvekus, kas ir ap 25% no pirmskara iedzivotaja skaita. Tas ir katrais ceturtais. Atgadinu, ka sodien Latvijas iedzivotaju skaits pec oficialiem datiem ir aptuveni 2 200 000, bet pirms kara bija ap 1 900 000.
Par visu citu:
1. "Vai mans avatars tevī rada nacionālu/etnisku/reliģisku naidu, ja jā tad jau tā būtībā nav mana problēma..." Mana galvena problema ir labi pildit savus dienesta pienakumus, un nenobanojot tevi uzreiz, es tos parkapu. Bet tu vel man seit provoce. Nu, paldies tev, dargais

2. KĀPĒC WG ir šāda nostāja?! - kurs tev ir teicis, ka WG vispar ir kaut kada "nostaja"? WG ir liela kompanija, tur strada vairak par 200 cilveku. Ja tu gribi zinat kompanijas viedokli, es tev auksa visu paskaidroju. Bet ja tu gribi zinat, kapec tam cilvekam, kurs ir rakstijis so atbildi (es varu tikai minet, ka tas bija SerB), nu tad prasi, ludzu, vinam.
Bet man ir tada "priekssajuta", ka es varu aptuveni zinat atbildi: tapec, ka Baltkrievuja no vaciesiem kara laika gajusi boja atuveni 2 400 000 cilvekus, kas ir ap 25% no pirmskara iedzivotaja skaita. Tas ir katrais ceturtais. Atgadinu, ka sodien Latvijas iedzivotaju skaits pec oficialiem datiem ir aptuveni 2 200 000, bet pirms kara bija ap 1 900 000.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Horribly broken level system for tank companies
Link on message: #648507
VGA, on 22 June 2011 - 02:15 AM, said: Yes, with the current retarded system an IS-4 is equivalent to a T1
hvy and a Lee. Hurrr Durrrrrr ...

Link on message: #648507

LiannaSilverwind: Current company system counts IS-4 as 9 points, while T1 Hvy is 5
points and Lee is 4 points. Or did I understand something wrong?
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Statistically impossible loosing strikes
Link on message: #648383
trew, on 21 June 2011 - 09:30 PM, said: What's annoying with this game is it doesn't matter if you really
try to win or not. It's 50-50 win/loss anyway.

Link on message: #648383

LiannaSilverwind: Please check the official Hall of Fame:
http://uc.worldoftan...avg_performance
Are these people really that lucky?
http://uc.worldoftan...avg_performance
Are these people really that lucky?
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Historically inaccurate tank performance
Link on message: #648371
Tommen, on 22 June 2011 - 05:31 AM, said: And can you argue against the overwhelming number of people who
believe the same way? You can say "HURR HUR PROVE WIV NUMBRS AND
STATS" all you want, but when 66% of this poll and a large
percentage of the rest of the playerbase say Russians are OP can
you not tell that SOMETHING is wrong? Are every single one of those
players bad players who blame their performance on their
non-russian tanks?

Link on message: #648371

LiannaSilverwind: EU server population is higher than 500.000, therefore if the poll
gets 5.000 votes (does it?), it will represent 1% of the EU server
populatin. Can you provide better arguments than "large percentage
of the rest of the playerbase" as well, please?
I work with statistics daily, therefore I understand why developers ignore misinterpreted statistical data.
I work with statistics daily, therefore I understand why developers ignore misinterpreted statistical data.

Subject:
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\Ural Steel: Giving Away Prizes
Link on message: #648364
Baine, on 21 June 2011 - 06:17 PM, said: Yeah guys, don't complain about free things 
We were just disappointed because there was no great party after the Finals, except for the Red guys, what looked like a private party.

Link on message: #648364


We were just disappointed because there was no great party after the Finals, except for the Red guys, what looked like a private party.

Vallter: They organized it by their own. One of their captains had married
just before the tournament.
And we were working: making gold lists for teams, reimbursing the players, putting to order the departure information, etc.
And we were working: making gold lists for teams, reimbursing the players, putting to order the departure information, etc.
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Tehniskā palīdzība\neizdodas izveidot tikla savienojumu..
Link on message: #648251

Link on message: #648251
OldFox: Ar sadiem jautajumiem labak versties uzreiz uz
support@wargaming.eu, nevis uz forumu.
Subject:
International Forums\Baltic Forums\Latviešu\Spēles apspriešana\Vispārējas diskusijas\Tā ir oficiāla WG nostāja?
Link on message: #648185

Link on message: #648185
OldFox: Atbilde bus sekojosa:
Metiet nost emocijas. Jusu nostajai, tapat ka manai vai pat WG generaldirektora nostajai saja lieta nav NEKADAS nozimes.
Forums pieder WG un skaitas par WG komercdarbibas instrumentu. Kompanija Wargaming.net LLC ir registreta Londona, tapec sava komercdarbiba ir SPIESTA vadities tikai un vienigi ar Lielbritanijas likumdosanu. Savukart Lielbritanijas likumdosana atieciba uz II Pasaules karas rezultatiem, tapat ka visa Eiropa (Vacija, Francija, Italija, Holande utt.), balstas uz starptaustikajiem juridiskiem aktiem.
Konkreti saja lieta visa Eiropa pieturas pie Nirnbergas procesa spriedumiem. Bet Nirnbergas procesa spriedumi ir sekojosi (rakstu tikai to, kas ir visiem zinams, jo nevaru citet tiesas protokolus burtiski): fasiskais rezims bija atzists par noziedzigu, visi III Reiha lideri bija atzisti par nozedzniekiem, SS, NASDAP un citas fasiskas organizacijas, ka ari tas dalibnieki ari bija atzisti par noziedzniekiem. Par NKVD, Stalina rezimu utt. Nirnberga procesa doumentos nav ne varda.
Es saprotu, ka kads var saskaitit Nirnberga procesa spriedumos netaisnigumu pret fasistiem. Neviens nevar apsudzet so cilveku. Bet tas ir tiri cilveciska nostaja, ar kuru WG nevar vadities tik nopetnaja lieta, ka WoT izplatisana un apkalposana Eiropa.
Ja, teiksim, WG nenobanos klanu ar nosaukumu NSDAP vai SS, kas var notikt? Kads gudrs cilveks, ieraugot to, var versties tiesa un uzbudinat tiesas lietu pret WG ar vienu vienigu merki - nopelnit. Domaju, man nevajag jums stastit par miljoniem, kurus sitiem "gudriniekiem" ir izdevies "izsist" no Philip Morris un citam kompanijam, un ne tikai ASV. Tiesi tapec WG Juridiskais departament noverteja visus riskus un izstradaja Speles un Foruma Noteikumus, ka ari Lietotaja Vienosanas. Mums, speletajiem, tas ir galvenie dokumenti.
Ceru, ka mana atbilde ienesis skaidribu saja lieta: tikai un vienigi juridiskiem aktiem ir speks. Ja Strasburas starptautiska tiesa kaut kad atzist NKVD par noziedzigu organizaciju, tad WG bus pamats nobanot klanu ar sadu nosaukumu. Bet ja WG izdaris to sodien, tad klana dalibnieki var mierigi verties tiesa, un vini 100% "uzvares" WG.
Un velreiz atkartosu: jums visiem ir izvele - vai tomer izlasit Speles un Foruma Noteikumus (vini ir pieejami gan krievu, gan anglu valodas) un sekot tam, vai nelasit un nesekot. Bet tad pastav risks, ka jus var nobanot. Saja sakara rakstu ar sarkaniem burtiem, kas nozime oficialo WG pozociju:
Cienijamais lietotajs Lito! Jusu avatara ir redzams fasiskais nozedznieks, Luftwaffe virspavelnieks German Gering. Tas ir Foruma noteikumu 3.4 punkta parkapums (http://forum.worldof...and-guidelines/). Ludzu Jus lidz piektdienai nomainit avataru uz neitralako. Ja Jus to neizdarisiet, es busu SPIESTS pastavigi nobloket Jusu foruma kontu.
Gribu, lai jus visi saprotat mani pareizi: es esmu loti lojals, pat parak lojals, jo sapratu, kas notiek Latvija. Bet, ludzu, nevajag to launpratigi izmantot.
Metiet nost emocijas. Jusu nostajai, tapat ka manai vai pat WG generaldirektora nostajai saja lieta nav NEKADAS nozimes.
Forums pieder WG un skaitas par WG komercdarbibas instrumentu. Kompanija Wargaming.net LLC ir registreta Londona, tapec sava komercdarbiba ir SPIESTA vadities tikai un vienigi ar Lielbritanijas likumdosanu. Savukart Lielbritanijas likumdosana atieciba uz II Pasaules karas rezultatiem, tapat ka visa Eiropa (Vacija, Francija, Italija, Holande utt.), balstas uz starptaustikajiem juridiskiem aktiem.
Konkreti saja lieta visa Eiropa pieturas pie Nirnbergas procesa spriedumiem. Bet Nirnbergas procesa spriedumi ir sekojosi (rakstu tikai to, kas ir visiem zinams, jo nevaru citet tiesas protokolus burtiski): fasiskais rezims bija atzists par noziedzigu, visi III Reiha lideri bija atzisti par nozedzniekiem, SS, NASDAP un citas fasiskas organizacijas, ka ari tas dalibnieki ari bija atzisti par noziedzniekiem. Par NKVD, Stalina rezimu utt. Nirnberga procesa doumentos nav ne varda.
Es saprotu, ka kads var saskaitit Nirnberga procesa spriedumos netaisnigumu pret fasistiem. Neviens nevar apsudzet so cilveku. Bet tas ir tiri cilveciska nostaja, ar kuru WG nevar vadities tik nopetnaja lieta, ka WoT izplatisana un apkalposana Eiropa.
Ja, teiksim, WG nenobanos klanu ar nosaukumu NSDAP vai SS, kas var notikt? Kads gudrs cilveks, ieraugot to, var versties tiesa un uzbudinat tiesas lietu pret WG ar vienu vienigu merki - nopelnit. Domaju, man nevajag jums stastit par miljoniem, kurus sitiem "gudriniekiem" ir izdevies "izsist" no Philip Morris un citam kompanijam, un ne tikai ASV. Tiesi tapec WG Juridiskais departament noverteja visus riskus un izstradaja Speles un Foruma Noteikumus, ka ari Lietotaja Vienosanas. Mums, speletajiem, tas ir galvenie dokumenti.
Ceru, ka mana atbilde ienesis skaidribu saja lieta: tikai un vienigi juridiskiem aktiem ir speks. Ja Strasburas starptautiska tiesa kaut kad atzist NKVD par noziedzigu organizaciju, tad WG bus pamats nobanot klanu ar sadu nosaukumu. Bet ja WG izdaris to sodien, tad klana dalibnieki var mierigi verties tiesa, un vini 100% "uzvares" WG.
Un velreiz atkartosu: jums visiem ir izvele - vai tomer izlasit Speles un Foruma Noteikumus (vini ir pieejami gan krievu, gan anglu valodas) un sekot tam, vai nelasit un nesekot. Bet tad pastav risks, ka jus var nobanot. Saja sakara rakstu ar sarkaniem burtiem, kas nozime oficialo WG pozociju:
Cienijamais lietotajs Lito! Jusu avatara ir redzams fasiskais nozedznieks, Luftwaffe virspavelnieks German Gering. Tas ir Foruma noteikumu 3.4 punkta parkapums (http://forum.worldof...and-guidelines/). Ludzu Jus lidz piektdienai nomainit avataru uz neitralako. Ja Jus to neizdarisiet, es busu SPIESTS pastavigi nobloket Jusu foruma kontu.
Gribu, lai jus visi saprotat mani pareizi: es esmu loti lojals, pat parak lojals, jo sapratu, kas notiek Latvija. Bet, ludzu, nevajag to launpratigi izmantot.
Subject:
Financial Department\Financial Issues\1 week and no gold?
Link on message: #647269
Mikicat, on 21 June 2011 - 05:24 PM, said: Hello!
I'm really struggling to get any help on this as I tried to send support tickets, but you are unable to reply to your answers so it seems impossible to get the information I need!
It may be that I'm just very stupid that can't understand this, but it's been a full 7 days now since my bank confirmed a completed transaction, but no gold has shown up and when I inquire about it to support I get a response saying the transaction isn't completed yet. May well be, but is there anyone I can have a dialogue with to get to the bottom of this? I spent 50 euros on the 14500 gold package, and that's money I'd rather get something for, as I'm sure you understand.
Thank you for any help/reference to a place where I can receive help with my problem.

Link on message: #647269

I'm really struggling to get any help on this as I tried to send support tickets, but you are unable to reply to your answers so it seems impossible to get the information I need!
It may be that I'm just very stupid that can't understand this, but it's been a full 7 days now since my bank confirmed a completed transaction, but no gold has shown up and when I inquire about it to support I get a response saying the transaction isn't completed yet. May well be, but is there anyone I can have a dialogue with to get to the bottom of this? I spent 50 euros on the 14500 gold package, and that's money I'd rather get something for, as I'm sure you understand.
Thank you for any help/reference to a place where I can receive help with my problem.
Tanitha: What is your ticket numbers, and payment type?
International bank transfers can take a long time.
Regards Tan.
International bank transfers can take a long time.
Regards Tan.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Statistically impossible loosing strikes
Link on message: #647084
Pips, on 20 June 2011 - 11:04 PM, said: Can u explain this please because this is instant loss even before
start.

Link on message: #647084

LiannaSilverwind: There is no instant loss. My last battle yesterday had the
following team compositions:
our T34, Jagdtiger, KV-5, Lowe (0 platoons) vs. their 2x IS-4, 3x ISU-152 (2 platoons)
our Hummel + SU-26 vs. their SU-14
We've won because we tried to.
our T34, Jagdtiger, KV-5, Lowe (0 platoons) vs. their 2x IS-4, 3x ISU-152 (2 platoons)
our Hummel + SU-26 vs. their SU-14
We've won because we tried to.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #646438
Lobo, on 21 June 2011 - 12:36 PM, said: Think you missspelled. "Changes to German medium tanks line
according to the revised German tech tree."

Link on message: #646438

Overlord: Corrected. Thanks for the heads up.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #646433
Cmd_Hagen, on 21 June 2011 - 08:43 AM, said: According to this link: http://game.worldoft.../in_development it seems
as if the IS4 tier 10 change has now ALSO been postponed AND that
patch 6.6 is now no longer July but July-August.
Can you confirm that we won't see the IS4 change before September - and will it come along with the introduction of the M103?
Also, what is the reason why these two changes were put off?

Link on message: #646433

Can you confirm that we won't see the IS4 change before September - and will it come along with the introduction of the M103?
Also, what is the reason why these two changes were put off?
Overlord: Timeline of IS-4 revision will be announced later. These 2 were put
off so as not to cause delay of the whole update.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #646363
az_ember, on 21 June 2011 - 08:35 AM, said: Hi
Im sure u gonna delete this but i have to ask:
Is the MM working very well?
Look at the pics pls.
shot_003.jpg

Link on message: #646363

Im sure u gonna delete this but i have to ask:
Is the MM working very well?
Look at the pics pls.

Overlord: Which side won?
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #646362
Wriothesley, on 21 June 2011 - 07:56 AM, said: I have question: since M103 is delayed, is it coming together with
M110, or still people will have time to go to T30 in new tank?

Link on message: #646362

Overlord: They might come in two different updates.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #646310
Vogel, on 20 June 2011 - 11:25 PM, said: Question 1: The blueprints and/or research on the E-50 suggested
that it might be fitted with an auto-loading mechanism of four
shots, before reloading. Will we get an option to mount a similar
gun?
Here's the complete quote and the source:
"There are references to a semi-automatic loading system designed and built by Skoda and trialed in Schmalturm. The 7.5 cm KwK 44/2 gun may have been fitted with a recoil operated automatic loader/rammer operating with a four round cassette, which the crew just had to top up. It was expected to produce a firing rate of 40 rounds per minute, but it is doubtful if the poor loader would be able to keep up! There was probably not enough room in the 8.8 cm armed turret for this apparatus."
Source:http://fingolfen.tri...series/e50.html
Question 2: There is claims on this forum that Panthers hitboxes/weakspots are bugged. Sometimes it deflects t8 shots, and sometimes t4 shots goes straight through the armour. Is there any truth to this/is it checked?

Link on message: #646310

Here's the complete quote and the source:
"There are references to a semi-automatic loading system designed and built by Skoda and trialed in Schmalturm. The 7.5 cm KwK 44/2 gun may have been fitted with a recoil operated automatic loader/rammer operating with a four round cassette, which the crew just had to top up. It was expected to produce a firing rate of 40 rounds per minute, but it is doubtful if the poor loader would be able to keep up! There was probably not enough room in the 8.8 cm armed turret for this apparatus."
Source:http://fingolfen.tri...series/e50.html
Question 2: There is claims on this forum that Panthers hitboxes/weakspots are bugged. Sometimes it deflects t8 shots, and sometimes t4 shots goes straight through the armour. Is there any truth to this/is it checked?
Overlord: 1. Such gun is not planned.
2. No bugs, upper front hull - 82mm (machine gun slot - 42mm), lower front hull - 62mm, observation devices - no armor.
2. No bugs, upper front hull - 82mm (machine gun slot - 42mm), lower front hull - 62mm, observation devices - no armor.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #646157
dagijs, on 20 June 2011 - 10:57 PM, said: Overlord I have a question: When 6.6 comes out, will I be able to
research both the Vk4502 Ausf.B. and the E-75 or just one since the
VK4502Ausf.A. and the Tiger P arent schedueled for 6.6? How will
this be solved ? Thanks in advance.

Link on message: #646157

Overlord: Preliminary patch notes of v.0.6.6 update:
- New German heavy tanks line: Pz.VI Tiger (P), VK 4502 (P) Ausf A, Е-75, Е-100.
- New tank E-50, a substitution to Panther II as tier 9 German medium tank. Changes to US medium tanks line according to the revised German tech tree.
- New German heavy tanks line: Pz.VI Tiger (P), VK 4502 (P) Ausf A, Е-75, Е-100.
- New tank E-50, a substitution to Panther II as tier 9 German medium tank. Changes to US medium tanks line according to the revised German tech tree.
Subject:
News from the Front\Discussion of News Articles\Full Tech Trees Revised and Improved
Link on message: #645293
borrisimo, on 20 June 2011 - 11:35 PM, said: I'm currently on IS4 grinding my way to IS7 but if IS4 becomes
Tier10 then is there any point in my wasting the next 2 weeks
grinding if the IS7 is the same Tier, are both IS7 and IS4 going to
be identical in stats ?

Link on message: #645293

LiannaSilverwind: IS-4 will be Soviet "Maus", ie. slower tank with better armor. IS-7
will remain as it is - medium-like tank with good enough speed but
bad armor.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\Statistically impossible loosing strikes
Link on message: #645216
Pips, on 20 June 2011 - 11:04 PM, said: Can u explain this please because this is instant loss even before
start.


Link on message: #645216


Overlord: There is no tank-to-tank balancing. MMS ensures equal value of the
teams in general. Nothing is decided here before the start.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #645130
ZabojczyKartofel, on 20 June 2011 - 08:49 PM, said: 1.Second Russian HT line( KV-4, T-150) will be added in 6.7 patch
or later?
2.Which top tier russian HT will be upgradable? IS-4 or IS-7?
3.E-100 150mm gun is as good or better than 128mm Maus gun?
4.What has be the best gun on the E-50? 105mm or 88/L100?
Regards

Link on message: #645130

2.Which top tier russian HT will be upgradable? IS-4 or IS-7?
3.E-100 150mm gun is as good or better than 128mm Maus gun?
4.What has be the best gun on the E-50? 105mm or 88/L100?
Regards

Overlord: 1. Will see. Either in 6.7 or later.
2. IS-4 if any.
3. It depends, each gun implies its own playstyle.
4. Most likely - 105mm.
2. IS-4 if any.
3. It depends, each gun implies its own playstyle.
4. Most likely - 105mm.
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #645116
han_solo_79, on 20 June 2011 - 07:34 PM, said: So, why don't you make this values public? For example: Panther and
Panther II got camo values similar to heavy tanks so i don't even
bother to equip it with camo net. But. T54 got camo values better
than Leopard! Connected with better armor (hull: 100 on Panther II
and 120 on T54, turret: 120 on Panther II and 200 on T54) T54
overpowers counterparts. Now community thinks that camo values are
biased towards Soviet, what more, community thinks that every
single hidden data is biased towards Soviets. Prove them wrong and
make them public.
That's was my 5 groszy now my question:
After E50 release in what configuration I will keep my T9 medium? Now I've got top gun, but I've got no top engine - will I have same modules researched (even it will be new modules)?
Thanks.

Link on message: #645116

That's was my 5 groszy now my question:
After E50 release in what configuration I will keep my T9 medium? Now I've got top gun, but I've got no top engine - will I have same modules researched (even it will be new modules)?
Thanks.
Overlord: Yes, the same module setup, even if there are new modules (e.g.
turret).
Subject:
Game Discussion\Gameplay Discussion\EU Questions & Answers
Link on message: #645114
Tabs, on 20 June 2011 - 06:23 PM, said: People in the public test have given quite various opinions about
the T95. It seems to have many front armor weakspots and not as
good as people thought it would be. So I wonder,have you already
decided to make some changes to it? Nerfs,Buffs,... I would just
like an answer "yes" or "no" to see if it is going to be changed or
is this the final version 

Link on message: #645114


Overlord: As long as public test is on, changes to T95 are possible.
Реклама | Adv